The results from an experiment to domesticate wild foxes has led scientists to theorize that the transformation of humanity from hunter-gatherers to modern civilization is essentially a grand scale project in the domestication, i.e. feminization, of men. Reader D.R. writes,
I heard a radio segment the other day you might find interesting. It examines the physical changes that occur in animals when they’re domesticated, and then applies it to humans as we’ve gone from hunter-gatherer to modern society. Among other changes (like pointy to floppy ears in foxes), the animals became more feminine as they became more sociable. The cause? Lower testosterone. Here’s the link:
http://www.radiolab.org/story/91696-new-nice/
Be warned: the show has that npr cheesedick feel to it, but this must be the kind of crap necessary to make science palatable to the masses.
John Scalzi explained.
What a shame that the price to be paid for civilized prosperity is male castration. And that’s not a figure of speech. More domestication means lower testosterone. And there is tantalizing evidence of this being a worldwide phenomenon. Sperm count and quality have been falling for generations. Fertility is dropping in all but the most testosterone-y regions (Africa).
The trade-offs would superficially appear to be worth it, (especially for women), but what if we telescope outward to the distant future? What happens to a nation of manboobs and male feminists? A dearth of masculine aggression has downsides: apathy, conformity, lack of creativity, disposition to believe feelgood platitudes. But perhaps worst of all, the fate of such feminized nations is always the same: overrun by manlier cultures.
(For a laugh, check out the comment from “Gigi Jacobs”. A perfect distillation of NPR leftoid psychological projection.)
[…] The Domestication Of Western Men […]
Excuse me, I have a job where I exercise great creativity every day, and I am a woman. I am not apathetic and not particularly conformist either. THESE ARE NOT MASCULINE QUALITIES DRIVEN BY THE AMOUNT OF TESTOSTERONE.
hee hee hee hee
Do you wear a grass skirt? Do your hands tell a story?
> “great creativity”
Do you shave your pussy?
Arizona teacher stabbed, raped after being left alone with sex offender at a prison
http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/06/19/arizona-teacher-stabbed-raped-after-being-left-alone-with-sex-offender-at-a-prison/
…The teacher was administering a high school equivalency test to about a half-dozen inmates in a classroom with no guard nearby and only a radio to summon help…
After the last of the other inmates left, Jacob Harvey asked the teacher if she could open the bathroom and then attacked her, records show. Harvey is accused of stabbing her in the head with a pen, forcing her to the ground and raping her…
And I bet she thought that she’d be viewed as one of the “good whites” by the natives when they get restless and this would save her.
Various forms of heroic nationalism mitigate that effect. Those have their own hazards though.
I do think it’s telling that red-state Americans are rural and more masculine, and blue-staters more urban and feminine.
It’s been a long trope that woman represents civilization and man wilderness. Similarly, women look for the biggest city they can find (thus the popularity of ‘sex and the city’) and men are more likely to want to live in the wilderness. Cities are more social, the country more physical. Etc.
Unfortunately, this is the logical consequence of Christianity, which exists in the main as a check on masculinity, and over milennia has succeeded, like water scouring out a sandstone rock. Christianity says its real enemy is Satan but is actually Nature, both Human and Mother.
Yeah, everybody running around with their Bibles in the streets of NYC, it’s a mess I tell you, a mess.
No, not “running around with their Bibles”. You know what he means. Xtianity preached to people that weakness is good, strength is bad. And that “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female, for you are all one in Jesus.” And that it is good to “turn the other cheek”, which is what the powerless slaves and servants in the Roman Empire wanted to hear. “The first shall be the last and the last shall be the first”. “But woe to you, you rich. You have already had your pay.” And let’s not forget the insane “You shall not kill.”
Western men ignored the Xtian suicidal preaching much of the time, because those who didn’t do so were conquered and destroyed. But it was always there, unchangeable in the Bible. All wars had to be hypocritically justified by saying your side had been attacked, so you had to defend yourselves – and even that you had to ask “forgiveness” for. When Westerners expanded, like all peoples did when given the chance, this had to be justified: you couldn’t stand up straight and say you did it for Western peoples. No, you had to say you did it to “save souls” by baptizing the non-Whites.
The priests approved only so they could have their reach extended to more peoples. For this purpose they willingly used Western expansion. Then turned on it once it was done. The church in South Africa preached over and over again how evil it was that Whites had land. It should be turned over the Blacks (even though that region was almost empty of peoples when Whites came there; Africans migrated southward at the same time).
When the socialist media owners preached that White colonies were evil, the churches agreed. Those who didn’t agree were silent. The excuse that non-Whites must be Christianized could no longer be used. The secondary excuse that they must be taught reading and writing etc was also over. And Whites had never been allowed by their religion to say, “It is good that we take this land because we will handle it better.”
So when the socialist media owners attacked Western ownership of conquered land there was no justification. Thanks to Xtianity had no response when they said it was evil to hold on to it. Whites gave up their land, and then agreed that they had been evil for taking it in the first place. And because so much land could not be abandoned completely – North America for example – Whites agreed that it only made them more evil. And for that evil breach of the slave morality Xtianity taught us, and Marxism exploits, it is only right that we agree to mass immigration.
Hence the gangs in New York.
tl;dr
underbiter just inadvertently explained why written histories can be objectively negative in some contexts.
in that time, civilization was required and the masses got the stories they needed. that rubicon has been crossed and the pendulum is swinging back towards pre-christian barbarism and like any mass loaded kinetic object, picking up speed.
is what it is.
Arbiter, as usual you don’t know anything about Christianity, and are confusing it with radical liberalism and empty humanitarianism, which cherry-picks and misinterprets quotes such as “turn the other cheek”, while ignoring other points of wisdom such as “wives, submit to your husbands” and “women shall not presume to speak in church”. You fail to realize that Western civilization only started getting screwed by aliens once we rejected Christianity.
As Arbiter expands upon below, virtually every Western secularist is a Christian heretic. They may not believe in the Trinity, but they do believe in turning the other cheek, etc., especially when they can wield it as a weapon against men who haven’t yet come to heel.
What the fuck is Beta about striking so much fear in your heart that you wail and gnash your teeth like a little baby?
And then placing a millstone about your neck and casting your sorry ass into the depths of the ocean?
And then visiting the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse upon your entire family tree?
Oh, my bad, that’s White Knighting at its finest.
Yes, reading the OT. The Talmud is too big to lug around.
corvnius, who is your brother? A black Christian or a Norse pagan Swede? Who will take preference to going to your heaven? Universalism and egalitarianism are products of Christianity and there’s a reason why only formerly Christian countries take liberalism seriously.
eofahapi, stop quote mining the Bible. That’s as imbecilic as when atheists do it. The Bible also says a lot of other stuff that most Christians don’t take seriously and usually didn’t historically either. Christianity does tell men that the meek and poor etc.
Why is it imbecelic. To say something says something that it does not say is misrepresentation of fact. I am not saying one must believe in truth of Scripture, but at least do not skim through your new international versions and think you know Scripture, and misrepresent the true Word. The real opposition of masculinity is your liberal countries that disregard the Bible, and say homosexuality is fine, feminism is good, etc.
Meekness yes the Bible tells people must be meek. Which we said does not mean weak. What is weak about self control and strength? How does meekness oppose or suppress masculinity? Should humans just run around feral? Not try to control their strength? It is ideas like that make for downfall of societies. By all means, do not believe in the Bible if you do want to believe, but to say that Christianity opposes masculinity is ignorance and foolish.
Do you have understanding of many countries before Christianity? Many Ancient cultures were hedonistic pre Christianity, Christianity make order.
How much Christian societies like Europe have achieved while in Arab countries they are still stoning people to death and cutting off hands? Christianity in it’s correct form has been a blessing to civilization.
“in its correct form” being the key qualifier there.
Arbiter, Christianity does not tell men to be weak. That is a misconception.
1 Corinthians 16:13 “Be watchful, stand firm in the faith, act like men, be strong.”
In no way Christianity is a check on masculinity. It encourages masculinity. Maybe Heresy versions yes, like Protectionism, But Orthodox Christianity? No. It encourages patriarchy, it encourages correct gender roles, Orthodox countries have some of the lower rates of divorce and out of wedlock childbirth. (Except Russia and Ukraine who have some of the highest due to damage from Soviet rule).
In secular countries they have more effeminate men, more homosexuality, more divorce, more single parents, more crime. etc.
Christianity was the rock that European civilization was built upon, take that away, and allow feminism and secularism to rule, and western men become weak and domesticated. Christianity gave the strength and reassurance to men that it is okay to be masculine and head your household.
“In secular countries they have more effeminate men, more homosexuality, more divorce, more single parents, more crime. etc.”
—————————————————–
That is because ‘secular’ countries are those that have ‘graduated’ from Christianity (Marxism 1.0) to Marxism 2.0 and from chivalry (feminism 1.0) to feminism 2.0.
Yeah all that getting down on your knees and praying for forgiveness for lust and what not is real masculine. Christianity was the precursor to egalitarian feminism. As Heartiste has explained, women are attracted to men who feel entitled to, that is deserving of, sex and love from women and happiness in life. Christianity on the other hand teaches men they are nothing more than good ‘sinners’.
The true biblical teaching is that lusting after a woman is only wrong if it is another man’s wife you’re drooling over, or if your lust causes you to stumble into sin, or makes you go against a vow or obligation you’ve taken. If you were not allowed to look at ANY woman with lust then you’d never find a wife (or concubine). The key is that the teaching states to lust after another woman is to commit ADULTERY IN YOUR HEART and you cannot commit adultery in any way (real or imagined) with a single or otherwise marriageable woman.
This:
Unfortunately, this is the logical consequence of Christianity, which exists in the main as a check on masculinity, and over milennia has succeeded
You are SOOOO Right!
Man those Christian Templar guys running around with their King-James Claymores were a REAL bunch of fags!!
Oh yea, those Christian Southern Baptists were a bunch of fags too! Rolled right over for those Northern Yankee “Strong-Men”
Yes, Christianity was Marxism version 1.0.
As chivalry was feminism 1.0.
There most certainly is a pattern.
Agreed
You fail to realize that Western civilization only started getting screwed by aliens once we rejected Christianity.
This.
Over the past few months all those scripture concepts and disingenuous interpretation thereof has been explained ad nauseum here at the chateau… and yet we continue to have to revisit the same-ass lame-ass rehashing of the said disinformation.
The men failing the West and giving up the keys to the kingdom are decidedly NOT Christian… indeed, they heap vituperation and ridicule upon any who dare to stand up and take a full-bore Christian stance, whilst hypocritically mouthing the Mickey Mouse PC Christianity that the media lords ALLOW to be considered as Christian… and you Comedy Central-schooled fools swallow it hook, line, and sinker, like any blue-pill Cathedral shill.
I’m disgusted by the lot of ya. A plague on your houses.
I don’t buy it. We were just as civilized, in fact more so in many many regards, in the year 1914. There was *no* shortage of high testosterone he-men in the year 1914, hell back then the average guy working a Joe job would measure out a good ten points higher than a modern bodybuilder today. Yet in 1914 you had social rules, mores and values that were much more civil and civilized than what passes for society these days. In fact, the same thing could be said of the year 1776 when some of the most high T men in history fought and beat the Empire of The White Man’s Burden To Civilize The World.
We’ve had civilization for far too long for it to only now be making these low T hipster fags the norm. Something else is afoot methinks.
Yes. Like Arbiter also said, it’s something else. Masculine-Feminine and Discipline-License are orthogonal to each other.
Masculine/Disciplined:
Pre-60s America
Fascist Europe in 1930s
East Asians
Feminine/Disciplined:
EU / Sweden (factoring out immigrants)
American SWPL areas
Masculine/Undisciplined
Muslim Arabs
Prison populations
Feminine/Undisciplined
American blacks
Modern women
??? East Asians are not masculine. Black Americans are not feminine. I would restate it as this:
Masculine/Disciplined:
Sparta
Pre-60s America
Fascist Europe in 1930s
Feminine/Disciplined:
EU / Sweden (factoring out immigrants)
East Asians
American SWPL areas
Masculine/Undisciplined
Muslim Arabs
American blacks
Prison populations
Feminine/Undisciplined
Prole American women
A culture of thugs who “think” primarily with their emotions and eschew higher logic, and who almost all on the “low down” are not feminine?
Burninator, I agree with SC. I define a culture as “masculine” if outsider women want to f*ck the men within it, but outside men aren’t interested in the women.
“I define a culture as “masculine” if outsider women want to f*ck the men within it, but outside men aren’t interested in the women”
Exactly opposite. A masculine society where cultural constraints afford men a larger role in mate selection will maximize female attractiveness. Since neither sex evolves independently and since feminine beauty essentially means a more gracile form and lower testosterone, the men will become less masculine over time. In female dominated societies where women do all the choosing (aside from rape) men are selected for more rugose physicality and displays of social dominance(higher testosterone) to the detriment of female beauty.
Exactly opposite. A masculine society where cultural constraints afford men a larger role in mate selection will maximize female attractiveness.
I see what you’re saying now… a classic paradox.
No it makes sense to me.
East Asia is a masculine society. You think it’s feminine because the men are not big and muscular, and have a damaged SMV in our society, I guess. But it’s a far more traditional society than ours. Until 50 years ago or so, wealthy Chinese men could have multiple wives. When a wife marries, she leaves her father’s family and enters her husband’s family. It’s family oriented and formal.
They are under the modern pressures of decadence too, and the fallout of the one child policy (excess men) will be very difficult to deal with. But they have thousands of years of history to support their culture.
Whereas black America is a matriarchy. I’ve seen fat black women boss muscular black dudes around with a wave of their hand.
It’s more about the conditions of life, electricity, cars, medicine, and even indoor plumbing are very recent developments that represent an environmental change roughly equivalent to growing up on a different planet
But Wilson, almost all of those things were around in 1914, and most were available to the general public. I know it wasn’t fully transitioned, but the upper classes (the first ones to adopt the new technologies) that led men on charges in World War I were no low T pantywaists.
This whole low T thing has happened literally within my lifetime. The absurdity known as hipsters were an impossibility in my peer group growing up.
It’s something else. What, I do not know.
Exactly. Christianity provided the theological/moral/philosophical rationale for opposing masculinity, while technology made it feasible from a practical standpoint. But only temporarily. The scientific worldview has experienced its fullest flowering under Christianity, so perhaps the dogma of a God-Man is conducive for science. Up to a point.
> “It’s something else. What, I do not know.”
.
The War Against Boys: How Misguided Policies are Harming Our Young Men
Talking Back to Ritalin: What Doctors Aren’t Telling You About Stimulants and ADHD
Talking Back to Prozac: What Doctors Won’t Tell You About Prozac and the Newer Antidepressants
Friends: The Complete Series
Seinfeld: The Complete Series
This:
It’s something else. What, I do not know.
Estrogen in the water, GMO in the food, HFCS Food, Chemical exposure everywhere, + endless anti-male propaganda on the tv
WOW the snap-back to normalcy is going suck for society! LOL! I can’t wait for the day. I am hoping the snap-back is so bad we go full on Gorrr where the bitches ask for the chains (cause the alternative is worse!)
anon guy you better be developing a crew then
everyone around here thinks thugs have it easy
these dudes work the hardest jobs on the planet almost and work all the fucking time
there is never a time when they are off the clock there is no fucking clock
so if you think a 50 or 84 hours a week job is bad try working 168 hours a week
then some fat dude takes your bitch life ain’t fair
and if you can’t make it in this cake ass fucking society you will definetly not be making it in any other
get that money
“We’ve had civilization for far too long for it to only now be making these low T hipster fags the norm. Something else is afoot methinks.”
Not to sound like a lefty mushbrain, but I think our chemical environment has a lot to do with it.
Rome used to recruit it’s military from the countryside because city boys were too soft. Hormones in the environment make it worse for contemporary men, but in general the wussification of urbanites is nothing new.
Lyudmil, in general cities attract human trash. I’ve lived all my life in a large city and the story of a city is usually that the founding population is swamped out by hordes of illiterate imbeciles who couldn’t build their own cities, but are somehow allowed in(much like prosperous countries attract the human filth of other countries). It’s also an environment where social mores can’t be enforced consistently so the result is that people can free ride on the social capital of a city in a way you can’t outside of one.
This is why I want to move to a small town or to a mountain town, although it sucks because I’m cosmopolitan and enjoy urban culture.
That fox breeding experiment shows that even in just a single generation there can be considerable change.
Progressivist laws lead to men being incarcerated for things that they would not necessarily get jail time for back in the day (e.g. bitch slapping a girl).
And jail time is time not breeding.
So the ‘wimpier’ types can get ahead in breeding.
And runts running everything rapidly becomes women running everything.
Everyone thinks that feminism makes men weak and effeminate.
The truth is that feminism happened because of the proliferation of weaker, more effeminate men.
A proliferation made possible by the strength of numbers alliances they form against better men.
The presence of too many weak men then ‘triggers’ the females into dominance attempts and THAT is feminism.
Leah from Carbondale, IL <- ever been outside your suburb? nope, didn’t think so…
Albertine Flugzeug-Brand from Monaco/NYC <- ever been to the EU? nope, didn’t think so…
I used to bang out a leah from carbondale, small world
Heartiste, I believe that discipline is necessary for civilization, not feminization. We need the discipline that moves us from bandits to warriors to soldiers, so to speak. The weakening occurring in the West today, and spilling over to other societies (I don’t believe MMO obsession would have been allowed in East Asia unless the West had it, and pushed for individual “freedom” worldwide), is a deliberate push by U.S. media owners peddling a message created in the sociology departments at certain universities. A daily stream of news manipulation, but more importantly of TV shows and movies, shapes people’s perception of reality and their role in it. And even then it took many decades. And only works partially.
It only works partially, I say, because you see the revolt under the surface. This is why people cheer so much for wars fought by the establishment: because they long for a masculine no-nonsense approach, and the message for wars is cleverly adapted to that longing. This is why you see young people misguidedly playing MMOs; games like WoW are not about knitting, they are about killing on behalf of your group.
And this is why there is heavy metal. What a refreshing music genre, in particular in its newer form “power metal”, which has more emphasis on actually being able to hear the lyrics. The metal genre doesn’t focus on “love” in its music but on other values: listen to Manowar, for example, or similar newer bands.
I wish we would have had better media and better rule, which acknowledged that men are better for the warrior instinct and worked with that. Sending kids to learn to patrol and shoot at summer camp, for example. But even without the masculine leadership that has built societies for generations, the yearning for men’s values and men’s way of life remains. Given the right circumstances it would engulf society once again.
W.F. Price of the Spearhead asserts that plastics and birth-control estrogen in the water supply create lots of feminization. I would agree that the media is horrible, this is due to being ad-supported and depending on selling stuff to women who make 85% of consumer purchases. I don’t think it is centrally planned, rather evolutionary-organic in the feminized media (which as it became more corporate 1930-2014, has become more feminized).
Being more masculine has a massive sex payoff, so there’s that. Lifting, lean meats/veggies no starch, avoiding obesity feminizing overload through cheap carbs via junk food and sodas, has a payoff in sex for guys. So there is that. The flip side is masculinized women seeking to compete in very masculine fields: law, government, etc.
The plummeting in testosterone in the USA only began thirty years ago, as the country became LESS white and more black/brown.
http://press.endocrine.org/doi/abs/10.1210/jc.2006-1375
Plummet in testosterone levels corresponds with other mass hormonal epidemics, such as insulin resistance (t2 diabetes) and female infertility (amenorrhea and premature ovarian failure).
The sudden and systematic drop in testosterone and sperm counts, therefore, was not caused by evolutionary mechanisms because this happened in less than one generation.
Domestication not caused by lower testosterone; it’s caused by lower adrenaline, I believe.
The irony of Gigi Jacobs’s comment is that it is the left that is being bred out of existence. Political orientation has a high heritability, and there is a inverse, seemingly monotonic relationship between leftism and fertility. Limp-wristed househusbands and their feminist cunt wives don’t have many kids, fortunately.
Data from the GSS via Jayman:
https://jaymans.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/lib-cons-cohorte.png
thats why loading up on spics is the cause du jour.
whitey is doing the unthinkable and actually looking outside the 2 party fallacy.
we need more Hegelian dialect.
The good news is that patriarchy outbreeds feminism.
The bad news is that feminism still outbreeds men’s rights.
> “the left that is being bred out of existence”
THIS.
Chelsea Clinton is just now pushing out one single baby.
No Gore grandchildren.
No Kerry grandchildren.
No Silverstein grandchildren.
The Frankfurt School desperately needs the Armadillos flooding across the border because THERE IS NO NEXT GENERATION OF WHITE OR JEW LIBTARDS WAITING IN THE WINGS.
The Democrat party is about to collapse into oblivion if they don’t get amnesty for the Armadillos.
To complete that thought, think twice before sending your children to the indoctrination centers.
I’m convinced that humanity is doomed to destroy itself. Nobody wants to exercise a little discipline and martyr themselves to a cause they won’t even reap the benefits of before they die. Men will either suffer in beta obsolescence or indulge in hedonistic cad behavior. Women will follow the tingles and giggle as the pillars crumble. Society rots, the end.
the meek shall inherit the earth
you wish
But not the mineral rights.
hahahahhaahhaahhaahahahhahahaahahhahaahahahahhaahahahhahahahhaahahahhahahahaahahhahahahahahahahahaha
The problem with the word “meek” is that it rhymes with “weak”, so people think it means the same thing. No it doesn’t.
“It’s not the Earth the meek inherit, it’s the dirt.”
Meek translated Greek means something very different than the English definition.
It means control of one’s strength. It is a virtue, where as weakness is not virtue. It is strength combined with love and ethics.
This is what is so frustrating about language, there are words that one wants to translate but there seems to be no way to say them adequate in other language.
So people can get the wrong idea about the Bible and misinterpret. Actually Greek is a very rich expressive language, english is no where close. So when looking to ancient literature there is errors in translation and it is sad, because it does not do justice to original word. For example english speakers thinking the Bible says to be weak, no it does not.
“Actually Greek is a very rich expressive language, english (sic) is no where close.”
So how did the ancient Greeks say “twerk”?
“So how did the ancient Greeks say “twerk”?”
I am not sure, can you please give me synomyn for this word?
Twerk or twerking is not really a word. and it can not really be considered English or “American” even though it originates from the USA.
It was invented by semi illiterate black people to describe vulgar women shaking their butt cheeks to music.
I’m guessing it’s simply a silly combo of “twitch” + “jerk”.
The ancient Greeks, knowing the corrupting mental and moral influence of music dominated solely by rhythm, disallowed it in their theatre… and undoubtedly adhered to the true connotation of the aforementioned words in re movements or behavior which signify an unsound physical condition or response to deleterious stimuli.
Greg Eliot
I’m guessing it’s simply a silly combo of “twitch” + “jerk”.
The ancient Greeks, knowing the corrupting mental and moral influence of music dominated solely by rhythm, disallowed it in their theatre
—————————————————————————————–
Fcuk the Greeks, fuck Plato, fuck Socrates, fuck pythagorus, fuck greek theater, telly Savalas, them fucked up pastries made of air, Fuck ionic columns, statues of bitches missing limbs,
I ain’t thru!
Fuck George Stephanopalous, George Jefferson, Curious George, bitches named Hellen, Hellen Keller, the olympics, cruise ships, the entire Agean Sea, the apostle Paul, priests with beards…
Even Jesus would hafta hit this:
Watch that “fcuk Telly Savalas” stuff, pilgrim.
I’m still trying to figure out how she fit that motor under her dress… and what sort of fuel it runs on.
Lol. I do not know word for that. But that dance is lame.
This is real dancing.
That is “zeibekiko”. A dance that is epitome of masculinity.
And “dance, did you say dance?” 😀 .
And here is how a woman dance.
He is singing “Aneva sto trapezi mou, koukla mou glyka” which means Go up on my table sweet doll,
If you would like further translation I will translate. 🙂 .
Tell me, this is much more beautiful than twerk dance, yes? 🙂 .
… after it has been mined and polluted beyond all recognition.
The first twerk video I ever saw was at least 25 years ago on Johnny Carson – some Japanese chicks. Afterwards Johnny’s reaction was similar to his Floyd Turbo character’s deer in the headlights stare. But the impression I had was that some Rubicon of broadcast TV had been crossed, like Tiny Tim’s marriage.
Of course, the women love to hear this sort of thing, but what about the observed fact (and basis of a Game theory) that human females instinctively—and compulsively—prefer alpha (i.e. higher-testosterone) males? Thus do “feminists dream of stevedores”…
And this Gigi Jacobs—why, if I didn’t know better, I might almost get the impression she doesn’t believe in equality…
She may say she does, and may even have an equal sign on whatever she drives. But after reading her drivel, it shows that she has no regards to people that think differently that her.
Every girl says she wants Mr. Kind and Sensitive, but it’s still Chris Hemsworth she’s thinking about when she plays with herself, not Michael Cera.
Tell us more in re this “plays with herself” stuff, sugar britches.
LLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZLZOZL
Gays are believed to profit from this domestication. As an anti-feminist homo I disagree. Gays gain “freedom” to engage in identity politics and walk around hand in hand outside. But I think that’s bullshit; what homos like me want is hot sex. And you don’t find hot sex in a society of tamed and gelded men. Short story, gay guys want masculine sexy straight guys. And the only way you can get them is if a) they’re high-testosterone/always horny and/or b) they’re relatively poor and you can pay them to let you suck them off or fuck you. If you look at old books this is what most gays did, pay straight guys. It makes no sense to hook up with other gay guys if you think about it.
With increasing prosperity, the disappearance of the working classes, and the domestication that comes with it, gays are actually frustrated. They pretend they’re not but they are. The only guys you can do this with in the US are blacks who are criminal or have been to jail but if you’re not into the black physical type you’re in a tough spot. You have to travel to the third world (Arab world or Latin America) to find white-ish straight guys who will do this.
This is also why many gays subconsciously support Mexican immigration btw. They believe that it will bring down the price of “paying for it” and that Mexicans are more willing to do this. Unfortunately all the “immigrants” are short indios and the hot Latin guys are the ones who stay behind in Mexico.
I want men to be manly and undomesticated. But be aware that with that comes more homo behavior overall not less.
Cocaine is a hell of a drug.
And it is a white powder which rhymes with white power
coincidence?
I’m asking you because you are the expert on white racism…and fake lunar landings…
http://seanmaccloud.blogspot.com/2009/10/how-and-why-feminism-happened.html
Some of the previous comments involve the short term.
The post is about the long term, the switch from hunter-gatherer patriarchal culture to the agricultural matriarchal culture that ended only a few decades ago, with the rise of feminism and thus patriarchy.
I know the above sound the opposite of what most people think, but the big question is “who benefits?” and in matriarchal cultures like the one that just ended it was women and betas who benefited.
Women in general regard men as livestock, devoted to their sexual pleasure (alphas) or to their material wellbeing (betas).
In a patriarchal society women work hard to please and support the alpha men who tingle their ginas and give them the “best” sons, those who tingle the ginas of many other women. In a patriarchal society men strut, fight, look good and fuck around; their main activity is proving to women that they are attractive and their sons will be as attractive as they are. In a patriarchal society women want to spread their genes as wide as possible, thus they want their sons to be the best cuckolders, and therefore women compete hard to get fucked by the most attractive men.
The defect of a matriarchy from the point of view of women is that they work really hard to get the tingliest men to father the tingliest sons who outcuckold every other man but if this succeed their grandsons are going widely scattered and they don’t know who is their real grandmother, therefore not only women are powerless as they compete hard for the tingliest uncaring jerks, also as grandmothers nobody is going to support them: their own sons are going to be wooed and supported by younger women, and their grandsons don’t even know them.
Therefore women many dozen thousand years ago decided to domesticate men, to use men as livestock, just as they domesticated other animals: by offering them a steady situation, a steady shelter and food from agriculture, for the purpose of building a herd of valuable, well trained, easily controller sons (and grandons).
In a matriarchal society the wealth and power of a woman depend directly on the number and quality of men they control as livestock.
In a matriarchy women push hard and mercilessly the men they control to work harder and generate more profit for the women’s benefit. Husbands get pressured relentlessly to work longer hours and/or to boost their careers; sons gets brutalized to work harder and study harder to become more profitable assets. In a matriarchy women resent sharing the profits generated by their sons with other women, and thus matriarchal societies have dowries paid by women who marry a woman’s sons, and the wives of those sons submit to their mother-in-law and work for her too.
In a matriarchal society like that ended a few dozen years ago betas get laid, because women use “gritting their teeth”, “holding their noses” offers of sex to induce untingly betas to work hard for them. They will even stay virgin until marriage (as recently as the 1950s 95% of women were virgin at marriage or engagement) to give those hapless betas some assurance that the firstborn will be their own genetically.
In a matriarchal society domesticated beta husbands, controlled by rare and reluctant offers of sex and paternity are in exchange for that dutiful providers, and do all the dangerous, stressful, high effort work; women are “forbidden” by culture or law to do all the undesirable ones that are reserved for men. Eventually the disgusting beta husband dies early consumed by overwork and stress, and a woman enjoys on her own the profits of her husband’s investment in her younger livestock. The woman who has managed to train her younger livestock into becoming a well paid doctor, lawyer, businessman, manager will usually enjoy a good comfortable retirement. Jewish, italian, asian tiger moms brutalize their sons to ensure their own power and comfort.
Feminism has destroyed the matriarchy, because one of the two constituencies of feminism is women who care more about their tingles than their prosperity in their old age, and who are willing to cede all power to alpha men and to accept the patriarchy to get rid of the the disgusting betas that their ancestors had learned to domesticate.
I guess that eventually many women forget why their ancestors sought power and wealth in controlling provider betas instead of wild tingles at the cost of being subservient to and providing for tingly alphas.
Badass of the week goes to……a guy who was five ft. three.
Simo Häyhä aka “The White Death” is widely regarded as the most
hardcore sniper there ever was, with over 500 kills to his name. He
helped defend his homeland from the Soviets during World War II. Here
is his story.
Depending on the record, Simo Häyhä was born in either 1905 or 1906
in the farming town of Rautajärvi. Once the Soviet Union was formed and
Finland had gained its independence, the town in which he lived found
itself to be only a very short distance from the Russian border. His
childhood was filled with plenty of hard work on the farm, which coupled
with the Finnish wilderness made him a very tough – yet patient – man. A
few years later in 1925, Häyhä served a mandatory one-year service in
Finland’s army. While one year may not be a long time, he obviously made
the best of it: by the time he was honorably discharged, he had been
promoted to the rank of corporal.
Later on, Häyhä joined the Finnish Civil Guard, a military
organization comparable to the National Guard in the United States.
During his time with the Civil Guard, he received a great deal of
training, which included target shooting. Shooting was always an
interest for Häyhä, and any spare time he had was spent outdoors
shooting at whatever targets he could find. His first rifle was a
Russian-built Mosin-Nagant bolt action M91, and was later introduced to
the better-performing M28/30 and the 9mm Suomi submachine gun. Thanks to
both his training and natural enjoyment of shooting, Häyhä was
eventually able to hit a target 16 times per minute at about 500 feet
away, making him an excellent sniper—a skill that would later serve him
very well.
In
1939, the Soviet Union attempted to invade Finland. Being a member of
the Civil Guard, Häyhä was called into service, serving under the 6th
Company of JR 34 on the Kollaa River. Commanded by Major General Uiluo
Tuompo, the Finns faced both the 9th and 14th Soviet Armies, and at one
point were fighting against as many as 12 divisions— about 160,000
soldiers. Also at one point in the same area, there only 32 Finns
fighting against over 4,000 Soviets!
Despite being outnumbered, however, the Finns were still victorious
at the end of the day. The invading Soviets weren’t as organized as one
would expect: they spoke many different languages, and they weren’t used
to the harsh Finnish winters either. In fact, the winter of 1939-40 was
very snowy, and had temperatures ranging from -40 to -20 degrees
Celsius.
The Finns were also smart in their tactics, the most notable of which
were known as “Motti”-tactics. Since the Soviets would invade by the
roads, the Finns would hide out in the surrounding wilderness. They
would then let the invaders cross the border, and attack them from
behind!
Hayha’s involvement in the Winter War was very extraordinary. With
his Mosin-Nagant M91 rifle, he would dress in white winter camouflage,
and carry with him only a day’s worth of supplies and ammunition. While
hiding out in the snow, he would then take out any Russian who entered
his killing zone. Häyhä used a Finnish militia variant of the Russian-made Mosin-Nagant rifle, the White Guard M/28 early variant “Pystykorva” (literally Spitz,
due to the front sight’s resemblance to the head of a spitz-type dog)
chambered in 7.62x54R, the Finnish Mosin-Nagant cartridge, because it
suited his small frame (1.6 m (5 ft 3 in)). He preferred to use iron sights rather than telescopic sights
to present a smaller target for the enemy (a sniper must raise his head
higher when using a telescopic sight), to increase accuracy (a
telescopic sight’s glass can fog up easily in cold weather), and to aid
in concealment (sunlight glare in telescopic sight lenses can reveal a
sniper’s position). As well as these tactics, he was also known to keep
snow in his mouth whilst sniping, to reduce steamy breaths giving away
his position in the cold air. While he may sound like an ordinary sniper, this was far from the case: over the course of 100 days during the winter he racked
up over 500 kills, earning him the nickname “The White Death”. The
Soviets feared him so much that they mounted numerous counter sniper and
artillery attacks to get rid of him, all of which failed miserably.
However, on March 6th, 1940, he was hit in the jaw by an explosive round
from a counter sniper. He fell into an 11-day coma, awakening on the
day that the war ended.
Hayha was given numerous awards, and was also promoted from corporal
to second lieutenant, a jump in the ranks that had never been seen in
Finland’s history. Despite being slightly disfigured, he recovered from
his injury, and went on to live until the age of 97. He allegedly
attributed his deadly sniping skills to “practice”.
Despite gaining around 22,000 square miles of Finish soil, the
Soviets lost the Winter War, with 1,000,000 of their original 1,500,000
troops having been killed by the defending Finns. A Russian general
later remarked that the land they had conquered was “just enough to bury
their dead”.
Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b25_1402466887#xoGKmcK8qmEe8dhq.99
Read more at http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b25_1402466887#xoGKmcK8qmEe8dhq.99
Are you a fucking idiot? Google “Chris Kyle” if you want to see what a badass is really all about.
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
Re: Gigi Jacobs
It seems to me that the SWPL branch of humanity may be the most racist. There’s an increasing tendency for such to identify conservative thought and politics as a primitive trait, while the SWPL identifies itself as “more evolved.”
Do any of the rest of ya’ll think that these folks can’t seem to create any heuristic for living without recourse to the accusation, “You’re stupid,” when faced with realities that demolish their foundational premises?
I suppose I am inclined to fits of masochism, so sometimes on the way home from work I try to listen to NPR.
You should have heard the donate-athon the other day.
They really go all out in appealing to the vanity of their SWPL listeners…”our listeners are the smartest, and know the value of the service we provide…”
These faggots have a nauseatingly high opinion of themselves…
It aint self hatred, its hatred of low class whites.
I wish Glenn Beck would loose the reins of his network already. Putting a man who converted to Mormonism in charge of truth-telling is certainly not the best foot forward. It’s got so bad, I get my best news from blogs, correspondents, and careful evaluation of consumer and wholesale pricing – none of which saves time. Listening to NPR has become increasingly untenable, but there’s only so much Glenn Beck an atheist like me can stomach.
Do ya’ll ever wonder if the Mormon leadership all knows the cult is a lie, but maintains the lie as a means for preserving some part of American civilization? Never mind, that doesn’t pass several tests for plausibility.
Related,
A Google search caused me to end up at a blog called Wonkette
I read a few posts and a few comments out of curiosity
Wow…just wow…
Those (white) liberals ( Wonkette and her readers ) hate white people so much words escape me.
Hostility on steroids does not begin to describe it.
> “You’re stupid”
Where you live, do you get these Libtards with bumper stickers on their cars saying shit like, “My pit bull is smarter than your honors student”?
I read that shit, and I’m like, What? The? Fuck?
The Libtards hate human children [and their “breeder” parents] like you or I might hate poison ivy or fire ants or rattlesnakes.
I hear ya, sir. Before I finally abandoned the local atheist group, I discussed the stupidity of childlessness with several members, none of whom comprehended the waste that is a fertile person with no children. Among the god-fearing, I suppose one might construct plausible arguments for celibacy, but for atheists, it makes no f’ing sense. The only explanation I’ve been able to conceive – and the reason I quit the local atheist group – is that the members weren’t atheists, but were instead part of some godless religious cult. Red Pill and Dark enlightenment and PUA sites all provide the word for it: the Cathedral.
Incidentally, Anthony Watts anti-global-warming-nonsense blog wattsupwiththat has another good name for these folks: Team Science. Too bad it’s got nothing to do with science.
Dude.
You’re on the Journey.
Out of the Darkness.
Back into the Light.
Heartiste – Africans actually have lower testosterone levels than Westerners (despite their higher homicide rates).
Some discussion here:
http://racehist.blogspot.com/2009/06/replies-to-guy-white.html
The risible Gigi Jacobs has an equally laughable youtube channel. A Gigi quote, “LIBERALS ARE TOO GENTILE AND WE ARE GOING TO BECOME EXTINCT TO THE SPECIES THAT WOULD HAVE EVERYTHING. BE PROUND TO BE A LIBERAL.”
Be pround, be very pround.
She is though, like many SWPL chicks, highly fuckable / hot. This is the beauty of the Frankfurt School. They have taken some of our best women out of the gene pool permanently.
> “This is the beauty of the Frankfurt School.”
Well, at least from the point of view of the Father of Lies.
Gigi Jacobs MAY have been hot. Check this link, she looks awful: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_W8k-q6Rdc
“(For a laugh, check out the comment from “Gigi Jacobs”. A perfect distillation of NPR leftoid psychological projection.)”
It’s fine for them to say conservatives lack “fact parts” in their brain but when anyone mentions inter-race IQ differences they lose their minds.
ON TOPIC—
‘Hot 99.5′ is basically the hippest and most relevant DC radio station in that it has the youngest listener demographic.
They are currently holding a contest for “new brides” to post their hottest photo to win the contest (1,000 dollar prize). Now granted, more intelligent chicks are probably NOT going to put their pic out there. But there are about 100 submissions up there already so this is a pretty good cross-section of not only DC, but really the US.
Behold men, and look upon your ruination. Betas WILL marry anything. ANYTHING, and this is what keeps the perpetual cycle of disgusting fat entitled average americunts reproducing.
I really advise you take the 15 minutes or so to REALLY look at every photo. This is our future. Out of those 100 photos there are FIVE women I would date, a few more I would fuck, and 3 I would marry if they had the classic femininity to go with their looks.
That is a SAD ASS RATIO. 97 to 3 in a pretty good statistical sample are marriageable? Welcome to the USSA.
http://www.hot995.com/contests/summer-bridal-showdown/297456/Vote/photoDetail/402513
p.s. Don’t bother posting comments, they will be shot down in seconds, just enjoy the grotesquery that is these women in bridal gowns.
Funny, because it seems to me that the high-T males are having more kids than the others, despite being subject to extremely punitive measures for having said children. Within a couple generations, the children of masculine men will outnumber those of herbs by a factor of more than two to one (this trend started in the late 70s, after female sexual liberation, naturally).
I’d love to live long enough to see my “unevolved” grandkids kick the shit out of the remnants of the progressive white tribe. At this point, I think that might be possible. Dynastic succession is a beautiful thing.
“it seems to me that the high-T males are having more kids than the others”
—————————
While it would certainly seem that that should be happening if it was then the male children of today should be, overall, less effeminate not more so.
Yes, females will bang high T males over low T by default.
BUT they have to get at them.
Jail time is time out from breeding.
And, generally, the more violent the male (the higher the T) the longer the sentences.
And that’s good. Low impulse control imbeciles not existing is a positive thing, mr false dichotomy.
re PJ
“Low impulse control imbeciles not existing is a positive thing”
—————————————–
Not when it comes to dealing with women.
Such men (when abundant) have a tendency to stop fledgling grrrl power from ever getting off the ground.
Enough of those type around was what set the precedent for how a woman was traditionally expected to dress and act.
But by the by such men become far, few and in between due to being bred out through jail time.
> “Dynastic succession is a beautiful thing.”
Yeah, but it can take a long long long time.
It required literally a THOUSAND years [circa 450AD until 1450AD] for Europe to fully restore what had been lost with the fall of Rome.
http://www.news.com.au/finance/business/female-breadwinners-on-the-rise/story-e6frfkur-1226949331035
This story did the rounds in Australia this week.
“NAB says the figures show women are becoming more economically powerful. However there is still a way to go,” NAB business executive general manager Angela Mentis said.”
They’ll never get it. For every additional economically powerful women, there is one less economically powerful man she’s attracted to.
Politically correct society never addresses the issue of female hypergamy, and that economic power for women does not necessarily equal happiness.
That’s why it is hard to see it not getting worse before it gets better. The more economically powerful women get, the less happy they’ll be, the more wealth distribution, quotas and affirmative action there will be.
Will the truth ever prevail?
Truth won’t prevail in the current climate, there’s too much invested in keeping the status quo.
Equally funny is when Fairfax trots out the “where are all the good men gone” articles. They always interview post wall degree types who can’t figure out why they suddenly can’t land a high quality man with 6 figures in the bank.
I hate to chuck a Zombie Shane and post a million individual replies but one line in the article really gets me.
“A young woman of 25 today will still earn on average almost 50 per cent less over her lifetime than a young man of the same age.”
Sounds like a shit deal doesn’t it? What they don’t mention is her husbands money is usually also her money (women control most discretionary spending), women usually choose to have and raise kids at some point which hits their earning potential hard for a few years (never mentioned though) and that usually women outlive the men they’re married too and end up with his estate.
It rustles my jimmies no end whenever the “women earn less than men” shit is trotted out, as it’s meaningless without context and isn’t actually the shit deal it’s made out to be.
On average, women also choose to work less hours than men, they choose to do less overtime, choose to work at less dangerous thus less well paying jobs and the list goes on and on,
It is a myth that women are underpaid compared to men.
Pretty much everything feminists say about anything – from rape, domestic violence to pay gap – is based on distortions, exaggerations or plain lies.
What Canadian Friend said.
The “wage gap” is false after accounting for other variables such as hours, professions chosen, time off for kids etc.
I’m Generation X. This meme took root when I was a teenager. I’m a white collar professional with an advanced degree. I have never, once, worked in an environment where I was paid more for my dick. I have, however, seen female peers sought after because they had vaginas.
The wage gap myth, like the rape culture myth, will persist and get worse. Why? Because politicians use it to get elected. Interest groups use it to wring more free money from the gubment.
What better way for Hilary Clinton to get elected than to declare a phony “war on women” and get them to vote for her?
This crap won’t stop until there are no more white men to blame problems on.
> “I hate to chuck a Zombie Shane and post a million individual replies”
Dude.
The frigging LIFO stack is having her God-damned menstrual cycle right now.
Bitch is eating EVERYTHING.
Gotta chop it up into little pieces.
“They’ll never get it. For every additional economically powerful women, there is one less economically powerful man she’s attracted to.”
Times have changed but human nature (the natural order of things) remains the same.
The hamster is still a hamster, regardless of intelligence, education, degrees or career.
Only corporations, and cats will profit from this state of affairs.
Cue a future boom in escort agency type services aimed at women.
Alphas by the hour.
> “The more economically powerful women get, the less happy they’ll be… Will the truth ever prevail?”
DUDE!
These women get “economically powerful” by pursuing their careers at the expense of squandering their peak years of fertility.
The more “economically powerful” these particular women become, the more they breed themselves right out of existence.
Truth never prevails. What prevail is people with other ideas overthrowing the people in power. If men will grow the nuts to do this, a new paradigm will follow. Real change doesn’t happen through voting or debates. It happens through arms and steel.
Gigi shoud’ve flunked Darwinian biology as Gigi doesn’t have a clue as to how evolution occurs in nature.
Hint for Gigi: it’s not time dependent.
Good grief.
I thought I blew a neuron or two just reading that ‘genius.’
The trade-offs would superficially appear to be worth it, (especially for women), but what if we telescope outward to the distant future? What happens to a nation of manboobs and male feminists? A dearth of masculine aggression has downsides: apathy, conformity, lack of creativity, disposition to believe feelgood platitudes. But perhaps worst of all, the fate of such feminized nations is always the same: overrun by manlier cultures.
——————————————————————
The only thing that will work in the long run for any type of men’s movement is for men to be able to explain to women why men are interested in a measure of social and economic freedom. Men want these types freedoms (for the most part) in order to be able to build tangible things so people can have better lives and women need to be re-assured of this as foolish as it may sound. Mgtow will not induce women to change a damn thing they will simply vote themselves more benefits unless men become politically engaged.
Mgtow will not induce women to change a damn thing.
FTFY
Seriously dude, trying to argue with women or win them over with sane reasoning is an exercise in both projection and futility.
They were manipulated into their current state by powerful men, and can only be forced out of it by powerful men.
Nothing else.
“Mgtow will not induce women to change a damn thing they will simply vote themselves more benefits unless men become politically engaged.”
———————————-
Agreed.
Both mgtowers and the men’s (human) rights retards think they can win through political inactivity.
And all they have to do is just frickin’ vote the lesser evil!
A bunch of dweebs too self absorbed and generally stupid (a couple of doofuses holding signs at a slutwalk that say “WE (heart) SLUTS!” is asinine!) to help vote in politicians that agree with women 50% of the time in order to stop women from voting in politicians that agree with women 100% of the time.
And mgtow is also an extremely dangerous long term strategy.
Few take into account evolution.
Identical twin studies consistently show that personality is predominately determined by genetics.
So what happens when the only boys being born come from fathers that agree with feminism?
There was a recent study of British cats and changes in their evolution. I can’t find the link. It seems domestic male cats are neutered while their females counter parts aren’t. It turns out, of course, that females are finding “love” with the ferral males.
I don’t think civilization or this kind of domestication necessarily results in man boobs. We’re not drastically different than our ancestors 200 years ago, although we are to our ancestors 20,000 years ago. The reality is that we live in an era of terminal decline much like the fall of Rome. All cultures and people eventually go through this. Maybe the weak people who wouldn’t be around us multiplied more relatively since the reduction in infant mortality. This is more plausible, if one is looking for genetic reasons. I think it’s more of a software malfunction in our case than a hardware one. My country is going leftwards socially far faster than genetics could cause.
What civilization is incompatible with though on the long run is free female sexual choice.
http://k0ks3nw4i.blogspot.com/2014/06/the-sins-of-our-fathers.html
The contrast between Comanche indian culture and white settlers of the American west provides an excellent example. The Comanches were perhaps the most stark real, known and verifiable example of a truly masculine culture. Read Empire of The Summer Moon by S.C. Gwynne. The Comanches were free, unlike us. And, unlike us, their male members were encouraged and revered to slaughter other tribes men, rape their women and take them as slaves sexually and otherwise. Any honest strong intelligent male with a normal level of testosterone certainly would consider this preferable. The wusses and weaklings cringe. Today in our modern culture we are taught, coerced and drugged to be weak, communal, noncompetitive, compliant, gender confused and pussyfied to an extreme.
I think something the silver fox experiment is being carried out on humans through our criminal justice system. Putting men in jail for drugs and alcohol and handing out larger punishments compared to the rest of the world not only culls alpha male behavior, but it has a chilling effect on beta males too afraid to sacrifice comfort for a better chance with women.
[…] The results from an experiment to domesticate wild foxes has led scientists to theorize that the transformation of humanity from hunter-gatherers to modern civilization is essentially a grand scale project in the domestication, i.e. […]
Holy shit… this Gigi Jacobs is a goldmine of hilarity. She has a youtube channel promoting herself as a political commentator. You have to see this shit, it’s crazy
Oh, and one more thing on Gigi Jacobs, she also has a youtube video titled “My kids”… Guess what it’s about.
That’s right, it’s her and her two cats.
I was recently reading some myths about domestication (aka, neoteny). One is about the idea of physical neoteny, and behavioral neoteny. There are several breeds of dogs that combine more or less neotenous and even pure neotenous behavior with an atavistic or previous physical appearance.
Also read something very interesting, the highest incidences of breast cancer occur in Iceland and Jewish men. Large incidence of breast cancer in men is a relative anomaly, which is the result of man estrogenization process.
Another common misunderstanding about neoteny is the idea that when domestication is applied in a race, the results are always the same. In the case of the human species, it is assumed that all human population variations are domesticated, all will be similar to the Asians in behavior. All domestic dog breeds are the result of domestication (dur to me), but they do not exhibit the same behaviors. The breed pit bull for example, had little or domesticated, or managed to maintain much of atavistic traits, including the tendency for aggressive behavior.
Asians are more or less like a canine races who was not fully domesticated. The total domestication involves the mixing of genres, producing a race where men are unable to protect the females.
I was thinking that if it is possible to tame the fox in a generation, then it might be possible to do the same with the human races, especially the dangerous darkie. The first step is to transform the violence as an official mental illness (even if not) and chemically castrate violent darkie and promote the breeding of docile of these breeds.
However, it is still inconclusive to say that all dog breeds are fully domesticated. Perhaps, although the particular differences of each race, the extreme neoteny can produce more similar results than if you have a diversity of maturation between the races.
I know I’m causing conservatives here, but the liberal population is the result of increased intelligence levels beyond the capability of organic sustainability of human society. The vast majority of liberals are not children of other liberals, but conservatives and especially the moderate conservatives. The universality of certain human traits such as left-handedness, homosexuality or language skills, shows us that this gene is not only shared by some or specially segregated populations, but also for all of us. We all have degrees in the genes for greater intelligence, greater creativity (and psychopathology) as well as the panacea for all human behavior. As a result, liberals are the spawn of conservative heterozygous population. Just as there is a specific combination of genes, which are universal, that they produce these phenotypes minority.
The main explanation for the demise of Western civilization is the elimination of cognitive elites, caused by extreme neoteny. Asians with an introvert and pragmatic people seeking the safest of evolutionary processes. Caucasians as a transcendental race, always seek the ARF Faustian evolution, we want it all, and therefore have nothing.
Nothing is manlier than Nazi Germany,
or the British Empire,
or the Portuguese and Spanish Reconquista…
or the fucking construction and maintenance of the Roman Empire (up to apoint) and America (up to a point).
So no, you are wrong.
Civilisation is the greater expression of manliness and testosterone, at least traditional European Civilisation.
Now… if barbarian cultures take hold of your Civilisation and transform it… well the problem is that what is written in the Elders of Zion came to fruition. That’s the fucking problem.
And feminism is not civilisation, it’s anti civilisation.
Evolution is Bullshit. Never has been and never will be “Natural Selection”. What is “Natural” about Game? Absolutely Nothing. Nature does not exist. Mother Nature is just an Ad Agency fictional character to sell Dish Soap to Hausfraus!
If these Leftist Shitferbrains knew Anything About Science, which they obviously don’t, they would realize that these Foxes are being Selectively Bred. Foxes are not selectively bred for domestication as there is no fox for pets industry. They are being bred for finer and softer coats, and therefore one should expect some phenotypal changes to become obvious and grow over time.
People are not being selectively bred per se, but no one can seriously argue that Government Welfare Programs that breed Untermenschen do not have a serious and obvious Dysgenic Effect as low-grade inferior creatures that would otherwise starve or die are being subsidised to the abasement of Superior Breeds with Far More Potential and Worth than the Subhumans shat out by the “Welfare” SCAM.
What a load of horseshit. The real comers since the last half of the last century have been Asian societies that rank much lower than western societies in terms of machismo and even the testosterone levels of males. Anybody want to claim that those low testosterone males are somehow failing to achieve or are being dominated by their women? It’s the macho ape societies that are going nowhere – the mideast, eastern Europe, south Asia, much of Africa and Latin America, the American south. In the west,wannabe macho-apeism has become fashionable among women. The solution for the west isn’t to increase macho-apeism among men, but to decrease it among women.
Enjoy watching other cultures thrive and dominate while yours goes into decline as you pine for some sort of cave Eden, fools.
[…] Civilization is domestication is feminization. […]