The beatings of cuckservatives shall continue until they self-deliver in a pyre of cleansing sacrifice.
Reader Jarl passes along a story from Norway that is truly vomitous in scope.
This guy may not be a cuckservative but he sure is an idiotic cuck. Just thinking of this Norwegian guy Jorgen Ouren today. Mohammed is now the most common name for men in Oslo. Jorgen Ouren of Statistics Norway said: “It is very exciting”. Perhaps lost in translation, most likely not.
One of the most stupid statement in the last few years.
I traveled across Norway a few years ago. One of those old wooden stave churches has a museum attached to it. The church was hundreds of years old. Within there were photos of congregations from the late 1800’s, early 1900’s. Not Norwegian myself but looking at those faces staring into the camera I felt great affinity with them. Farming people, living hard lives in a harsh climate. Doppelgangers for my own ancestors. Anyways, pathetic how things have turned out for all of us.
“It is very exciting.”
If only that ur-cuck had added the necessary contextual clause.
“It is very exciting to watch Norway’s White population displaced by Middle Eastern lunatics and Norway’s white women raped by the tens of thousands by these vibrant newcomers.”
That’s the thing with race rucks. They ambulate through life sealed in a feels balloon that is easily punctured with a quick slash of the semantic shiv.
On a more (less?) somber note, what the hell is wrong with Scandinavians? Was the fight culled out of them so thoroughly by the loss of their sterner viking brothers to adventures afar that today they LITERALLY welcome their civilization’s cucking on a mass scale?
Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this? I’m open to the possibility of covert biowarfare or an unknown natural parasite infecting and damaging the minds of northern european weak whytes.
***
Commenter Lars Viker (great name, btw) writes,
It’s a really complicated issue, but here goes:
– Only 11% of Norwegians identify as feminists. But the ones who do are very loud and visible. Same goes with political correctness. And it’s becoming less popular and voices are much more frequent than just a decade or two ago, but there has yet to be a real paradigm shift.
– There are plenty of hard guys and feminine women in Norway, they just don’t pose in the media. For example, Norway is the only country that consistently gets more than one olympic gold per million people. Norway, with 5 million people, leads the winter olympics by a mile historically, and usually wins it or ties for first place even today (sure, the whole world doesn’t compete, but Canada, Russia, the US etc. do). Norway’s elite forces are some of the world’s best, and they’re drowning in recruits. Norway’s strongmen and powerlifters are some of the world’s best per capita, although beaten by Iceland (who are almost exclusively emigrated Norwegians). During the nazi occupation, some joined the nazis, and were considered the most fanatical of all the nazi forces, much more than the SS. During the end days of the war, when all was lost, the Wiking brigde wanted to fight until death on the Eastern front. They only unwillingly retreated back to Norway when ordrered by the nazis under penalty of execution.
– Norway is really conform. It scored the highest of all countries in Milgram’s conformity studies. Basically, if leaders decide to say something stupid, there’s a lot less of a chance that someone will object, no matter what the stupidity.
– Outbreeding has affected people. After Norway was christened, marriages within the seventh link (first is your brothers and sisters, second is your cousins etc.) were forbidden. This was done to consolidate power in the hands of a king instead of many clans. Inbreeding creates in-group attitues and ethnocentricity, outbreeding the opposite, extreme altruism.
– Norway was always altruist, but now the altruism has been increased and perverted from the group (Norwegians/Europeans) to include leechers (non working immigrants).
– It’s always been welfare orientated (dwarves have been found to reach old age in the Viking era), but now the welfare state has exploded in size and power.
– Norway has always had a lot of rights for women (rights to inheritance for example), but with feminism that’s been perverted beyond reasonable size too.
– Norway is wealthy, everyone earns a decent wage (or gets money from the state), social security is good, education is free, and there are few problems for most people. It forges a non violent, complacive attitude. War, muscles and guns are expensive. It’s more efficient to produce high technology until shit really starts to get deep. Even if you put together all immigrant crimes, Norway is very peaceful. There are usually around 40 murders a year in the whole country, always less than 1 in 100.000 people. Except for that one year, of course.
***
More from CH’s Scandinavian contingent. Reader Wachtmeister adds,
This isn’t the first time CH ponders about the scandinavian, or Swedish, madness. I have also thought about why my nation behaves this way many a times, and I beleive I have narrowed it down to a few critical points. This post became very long, but I was gonna write it somewhere sometime anyhow.
Anyhow, the reason why we are like this requires historical background and modern analysis.
1. Peace.
War and hard times breeds harder people. This is known. Some here falsely argues that christianity is the reason of the meekness of the west, which is a dumb idea, probably stemming from that hitlequote that if germanics were islamic they would rule the world yada-yada. If anything, europe was never more aggressive than during the heigt of christianity. In the 1600’s alone, there were solely 2 years of absolute peace in Europe. Christianity didn’t end the vikings. Swedes kept crossing the sea to wage war for centuries. Swedish aggressiveness shaped the northern geography of Europe, the warrior-druids of the asatro simply switched to christianity and became warrior-priests (Yes, we had warrior priests). Sweden was ruled by Warrior-kings who unlike most western kings actually fought with their men on the battlefield, like Gustaf Adolf the second who waged the thirty year war (that reduced germanys population by ~30%). Or Karl the 12th, who in the Great northern war alone Sweden fought Denmark, Poland and Russia singlehandedly, and defeated the first two but ended up losing to the Russian winter, a prequel to Napoleon and Nazi germany. Christianity didn’t end the Vikings, Vikings just switched appearance.However, since 1809 Sweden has been at peace. While, Denmark, Norway and Finland were invaded in the wars of the 20th century Sweden managed to stay neutral by skillfull diplomacy and a humble treaties. Sweden exported its iron ore resources to Nazi germany and let Germany transport troops on its railways. It must be asserted that before WW2 Sweden had closer cultural ties with germany than the anglosaxon west, it was more common to speak german as a second language than english.
This neutrality and cooperation with nazi germany would be used as a tool in the post-war era by the radical left to shame the right and move towards political correctness. In the 1960’s, Sweden was the fourth richest country in the world in total grodd domestic product, NOT COUNTING PER CAPITA, while being one of the smallest population wise. While the rest of Europe was ruined by the war Sweden had profited and was now enduring a golden age, we prevailed in sports (Sweden still has most gold medals per capita in the world), music (Abba, etc), and industry. We had all this money but we gained it trough supporting nazi germany.
The effect is clearly apparent, Out of all the scandinavian nations, Sweden is by far the most politically correct. Sweden takes far more immigration than the other countires per capita, if u think Norway is bad, Swedish journalists portray Norway as backwards racists who won’t embrace multiculture.
Sweden has been at peace of 200 years, and it has rendered us spoiled, ignorant and meek. While the other countries aren’t as bad, compared to a country like poland that lost 30% of its population in WW2 they were relatively untouched by the war. How large islamic immigration do you think Poland have?
2. Long, dark winters
Scandinavia has long harsh winters, a clear environmental difference compared to the rest of Europe. Harsh winters, in opposite to peace, creates hard people (and beautiful) people, though the effect is gone in modern times. Yet it also breeds a empathic, communal, cooperative culture. If the farmer next door has a bad season and is unprepared for the winter, what do you do? You give him some of your proviants, so that he can support you in the future if your harvest would fail, family or not. Harsh winters forced people to cooperate to endure. Take this is indifference to China, which lacks philantropy outside the family. There is always rice somewhere and there are so many people that helping someone and expecting return is asking for parasitism, families who fail to supply themselves cannot blame or expect support from anyone else. Sweden have a history of a very communal, cooperative history.
In fact, the same mechanism is why blonde hair stems from Scandinavia. If you have a harsh winter and food only enough for one of your women to make it trough, you save the one with the golden hair becuase her value is greater. If you have food only for one of your kids and you are blonde, you save the blonde kid becuase there is a greater chance it is your offspring (men can never be 100% sure).
This communal culture has created a strong bond among the Swedes. Gustaf Adolfphus could switch to protestantism relatively easily, as soon as it was established among the king and priests, people followed suit. It is the reason why Sweden was so succesfull at war, Swedish kings could drain more men and drain the economy of the nation more than other nations, creating armies that could count for 5-10% of the total population. When Sweden lost at Poltava, approximately 100,000 people were lost in a country that only included about 2 million people, including Finland.
The long dark winters has worked as a mechanism both for strong evolutionary development and altruistic, communal culture. Swedes follow suit. When political correctness and progressivness hijacked social democracy and became the established ideology, Swedes followed suit.
3. Social democracy and the political class
The two reasons described have another consequence that is worthy of its own point. The communal, altruistic culture combined with long periods of peace made scandinavia a fertile environment for social democracy. In its early days, Social democracy was merely class warfare of the workers done democratically, and they won. Before the war, social democratic politicians were mostly a mix of workers from all over the country, each representing the workers movements at their hometowns. Nation, patriotism, homogenity was praised among these men. As Tage Erlander stated in 1965 in response to the American race riots: “We Swedes live in such a eternally more lucky situation. Our countries people is homogeneus, not only in terms of race but also in many other aspects”
However, the post-WW2 birth of political correctness would create a new generation of politicians, the so called 68-generation. 68 was the peak of socialism, and those students inevitably replaced the old. They did not get their seats becuase they were the most competent, increasingly the power fell to the ones that were best at embracing the already dominant culture, in this case, progressiveness or political correctness. Women were brought in not becuase of their competence, but becuase they were women who claimed to represent other women. The introduction of the TV and mass media gave power to rhetorics and appearance rather than competence and results. Inevitably, the 68 generation would inevitable replace the old, and with it came the cancer.
Most tops in the party these days are there becuase they joined the youth organization at a very young age, started making connections at an early age, or had parents with the connections for them. All they had to do next was embrace the already dominant ideology and they were set. People who chose opposition on the wrong questions were doomed to not have a successfull political career. Me being a student at a world top 100 university, I have friends of friends who are now entering parliament becuase of their parents making them join politics at an early age combined with pure nepotism. These people live far from the ghettos in the most white neighbourhoods, yet embrace mass immigration more than anyone else. The argument is simple, there is war and horror in the world while we live in peace and prosperity, how can we deny refugees?
In the 80’s Sweden received about 30 war refugees from vietnam for integration, that was a big happening at the time. In the 90’s the balkan war started, and suddenly immigration were in the number of thousands. In 2014, we broke the record yet again with 116 00 immigrants, officially. Bear in mind, Sweden only has 10 million people, so a decade of this level of immigration is 10% of our population.
Just like in the US but more so, there is a political class in Scandinavia that has embraced political correctness and “progressiveness” strongly becuase of historical shame and cultural affinity for it. The right has never been as strong, since Scandinavia doesn’t have the same tradition of classical liberalism, and had were smaller countries with a more entrenched scene of democratic class warfare.
Future.
Id like to write this to give some hope. Last month, the Swedish democrats, which youth organization made a very un-apologizing video that CH actually linked last year (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VR-lAGj_dlQ), became the countries second biggest party in the polls. The current social democratic governments support is plummeting rapidly. 10 years ago they could claim 45% of the voter base, last month they scored 22%. In fact, the nationalist party is already the greatest party among members of the workers union, the LO. Even though every paper and media institutution, including the states insitutution, is unofficially or officially against the nationalist movement, it just keeps growing. Confidence for the journalist and politician proffession have never been lower in the polls.
The swedish people is waking up, and as some people said previously, we swedes are somewhat an all or nothing nation. We have a history and affinity for embracing the dominant ideology and stay togheter. We embraced political correctness more than anyone else.
We can do the opposite, too.
Wealth, peace, and extended outbreeding make a Viking man soft. Really, these environmental changes make any white westerner soft. Is the solution hardship, war, and arranged marriages?
lzozllozozo
lzozozloolzoz
A natural parasite indeed.
But why would a white lady want to do this to her fellow whites? I don’t understand /sarc.
I especially like when she says “Europe won’t survive” without the mud flood. Destroying the village in order to save it, you know, out of pure beneficence.
The white race, called by another of her tribeswomen “the cancer of history”.
Diversity: the cure that kills.
>white lady
she’s jewish
“I especially like when she says ‘Europe won’t survive’ without the mud flood.”
When she said “without [Jews’] leading role and without that [multicultural] transformation, Europe will not survive,” she was projecting. What she really meant to say is that Jews will not survive without multiculturalism in Europe, but was too dishonest to admit it.
Lawrence Auster, a conservative from a Jewish background, astutely described the pathological hatred and fear Jews have for gentile whites, particularly Christians, at FrontPageMag:
“First of all, as crazy as it may sound, there is something that many American Jews fear in their heart of hearts even more than they fear Moslem anti-Semitism, and that is white Christian anti-Semitism. Steinlight himself pointed to this phenomenon at a recent panel discussion hosted by the Center for Immigration Studies:
“‘Every high profile Jewish institution, whether it’s a national organization or a major synagogue, is surrounded by concrete barriers to prevent car bombs exploding too close to the buildings. If you go through the lobbies into those buildings you have to pass metal detectors and double-doors of bulletproof glass. You are then frisked by security guards, mostly retired New York City police or Israeli agents, and then are scanned again with metal detectors.
“‘What is truly comic about this—were it not an instance in the theatre of the absurd, and were it not so appalling an indication of the kind of mass denial that is still governing major American Jewish organizations, including the one I used to work for that’s currently meeting across the street—is that the staffs of these organizations pass the car bomb barriers, go through the double bulletproof glass lobbies, get frisked, then go upstairs into their offices and spend their days talking about the threats posed by evangelical Christians….’
“Jews’ risible obsession with non-existent evangelical Protestant anti-Semites, combined with their obliviousness to actual mass murdering Islamist anti-Semites (whom, moreover, the Jews’ favored immigration policies have allowed into this country) is an amazing phenomenon that we should not dismiss as simply a bizarre ethnic idiosyncrasy.”
The rest of the article can be read here: http://archive.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=12534
Jews have traditionally emphasize multi-cultural inclusiveness as a survival strategy to avoid out-grouping. Traditionally this worked as it allowed in groups that were further away on a cultural and genetic spectrum from the “core” than the Jews themselves. On a comparative basis, this made the Jews seem to the core peoples to be closer to them and thus less threatening, if you will, they became “token” core peoples. It’s rather a brilliant strategy when you think about it.
Unfortunately for the Jews this strategy is now backfiring as it has allowed in groups that explicitly hate and want to destroy them. As the numbers in these groups grow, they have a real problem. If it didn’t effect us, it would kind of be a bit amusing, but Mohamed hates us all.
“If it didn’t effect us, it would kind of be a bit amusing, but Mohamed hates us all.”
Gay.
If it didn’t effect us, it would kind of be a bit amusing, but Mohamed hates us all.
I’m guessing he wouldn’t hate “us all” if we didn’t serve as such useful idiots to those he does hate, with good reason.
High time “we” evinced a strong delineation in that that so-called “brilliant strategy” and made said core distinction truly distinct.
As the old saying goes: You lay down with swine, you come up smelling like pigs.
Jews are collectively paranoid and psychopathic, among other things. I don’t want to waste time putting them on the couch and trying to cure them of their mental illness. I just want them quarantined. They’re fucked up and all they can do is fuck things up.
Jack Schitz, I’m saying the same thing way below here. Eskimos are trying to recreate the seething sordid teeming turbid chaos of the Middle Eastern Bazaar – resurrecting the scams and cons and mafias and corruptions they had when the Sephardic Eskimos ran the Iberian Caliphate and the Ashkenazic Eskimos ran the Constantinoplean/Ottoman Empires – chaos so thick that the insanity of it allows them to fade into the shadows and the Shkotzim no longer notice that the Eskimos are the puppetmasters who pull all the strings.
Im Jewish and I dont get it either. The best explanation may be in the above post. Jews are very much inbred and communal like Swedes, and altruistic and all that. Thus the whole corruption of it. Not to mention a sort of reverse guilt where we feel we need to make the world all peaceful and equal and welcoming after 2000 years. Its pure insanity. Thankfully xenophobic Orthodox Jews outbreed them 3-1 and more.
@Jack Schitz
I think you have decoded this correctly. Jews let in alien looking exotics so that they look closer to the main White ethnicity and the main ethnicity concentrates its anger and energy on the exotics.
It works. Many right-wingers claim that Jews are part of the ingroup because they look white and that we should be allies.
“They are are not states any longer they are multicultural places in the world”
says a German Eskimo
So it is not Norway any more it is a multicultural place in the world
hypocrisy exposed
“Mozart, Pascal, Boolean algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Balanchine ballets, et al. don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history
Susan Sontag
‘what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world’
Just wondering what that may be
Since she is not able to clarify it any longer I hope thwack will
lzloozoz
zlzozozo
lzozlzlzozo
lzozozozozloz
You got Buckley wrong
Buckley remained committed to the idea that whites were the superior race.
http://www.alternet.org/story/155124/the_racism-conservatism_link%3A_'national_review'_firestorm_over_racism_calls_up_william_f._buckley's_troubling_legacy
I won’t insult your intelligence by suggesting that you really believe what you just said.
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Bubba’s new Eskimoess – Julie Tabor McMahon
Tabor is a “mountain” about a third of the way east from Nazareth, towards the Sea of Galilee. Bleached blond and looks more than a little Tranny. I wonder whether Bubba takes the strapon from her/him/it?
She’s the spitting image of Andrea “Mitchell” [WTFE her Hebrew name really is]:
Seems like a disciple of Alisa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum would enjoy receiving the strapon from his Tranny wife – Cosmic Justice of eBernankifaction.
lzoozlzoz ghey heartrsietets!!!!
http://www.occidentaldissent.com/category/cuckservatives/
lzozozolzolzolzozozozzozo
michael savage on cuckservatievszlzozozozozozoz
https://youtu.be/GVMKIhaNecA?t=6m20s lzlzlzzlnzzlzozoz
We’re going to need a lot more Breiviks.
They don’t call them squareheads for nothing.
Probably environmental toxins. But then the question is, why doesn’t it seem to affect the invading parasites? The parasites will eventually have to keep a few whyte Scandinavians alive, even if on a breeding farm. Otherwise who will keep the infrastructure going?
You can’t be serious about environmental toxins. The toxin is American media brainwashing people several hours every day. Scandinavia is no different from Britain, France, Germany, Canada or the U.S. in this regard. But American mongrels of course always like to score points by singling out Scandinavians to satisfy their envy, much like non-White hooknoses do.
Meanwhile all feminist theory comes from the U.S. And all Marxist theory that is taught at universities across the West. All the books are written in the U.S., all the names come from the U.S. But when there are leftist tendencies in the U.S., Americans will talk about the Left, liberals. When there are leftist tendencies in Scandinavia, they will instead say “Scandinavian”. Yet more proof that Americans should never talk about other countries.
The purest water and freshest foods I ever tasted were in Norway.
Jes’ sayin’.
I suspect Lutheranism has something to do with it.
Or perhaps Protestantism-turned-to-irreligion in general.
Scotland is the same way, except that they’re not independent, so they haven’t suffered the consequences.
Ireland is probably the closest thing to a Scandinavian Catholic country. Most of their immigrants are Eastern Europeans, and there has been absolutely no push in Ireland to admit hordes of “refugees”, Muslim or otherwise. Whereas all Scandinavian countries work with UNHCR to admit “refugees”. (Iceland is like Ireland, but I suspect it’s small enough to escape notice.)
Nobody likes the mechanics of how this is playing out, but who is pulling the strings here – who are the SJW’s puppet masters? And if it is les juifs as we’re led to believe, who’s making it easy for them to do bad? And who could swat those demons away like flies, but is choosing to ‘let everything happen for a reason’, as people like to say? The course of history is predetermined, and speaking of history, didn’t we hear the vikings/norsemen raided other countries for their women in the past? Perhaps this is what goes around comes around playing out. A sad whimper as western culture is fraying, but there won’t be any winners as a result of this.
This is the way the world ends…
This is the way the world ends…
This is the way the world ends…
Not with a bang, but a whimper.
– T. S. Eliot, The Hollow Men
Only because the Protestants ignore Luther’s teachings about the Jews.
From “Der Bolschewismus von Moses bis Lenin: Zwiegespräch zwischen H***** und mir”
“Indeed, Luther,” I replied, “said to the Jews: “You are not a German, but a deceiver, not a Frenchman, but a faker.’ His synonym for Jew was ‘liar’!”
“Yes,” he replied, “but we must understand what Christ meant by ‘enemy.’ We can love an honorable and decent enemy, even a brutal one, who is frank and forthright in his enmity. And at the same time we can beware of him. But Christ never dreamed that we should love men whom no love whatever could dissuade from their implacable determination to poison us, body and soul.
“Luther’s spirit seems to be completely played out among our Protestants. On the question of all questions, the Jewish question, they either hush him completely or try to tone him down.”
“Yes, even Luther was taken in by the ‘chosen people,’” I replied. “He looked upon the Old Testament as divine revelation. He approached the book with infatuation, convinced that it could contain nothing but sheer preciousness. Then he began wading into the vile thing. After a few steps he blinked his eyes, bewildered. He was stunned. That just couldn’t be so! It must have some other meaning!
–And you will be called priests of the LORD, you will be named ministers of our God. You will feed on the wealth of nations, and in their riches you will boast.–
–Ask me, and I will make the nations your inheritance, the ends of the earth your possession.–
” Ireland is probably the closest thing to a Scandinavian Catholic country. Most of their immigrants are Eastern Europeans, and there has been absolutely no push in Ireland to admit hordes of “refugees”, Muslim or otherwise. ”
Are you sure about this ?
Scandinavians and whites in general are extreme people. All or nothing types, so I could see the Swedes driving their diversity into the sea next year given the right events. Heck, Sweden was the most Jew wise (antisemitic) country for a long time.
Per Nietzsche: “Madness is something rare in individuals — but in groups, parties, peoples, and ages, it is the rule.”
Nope, too late. Some naive and utopian Swede thought – ‘those poor brown people – we should let them stay here with us – there’s room enough’. It wasn’t a conspiracy, they didn’t go mad – Their minds simply could not conceive the scale of the third world …
//giphy.com/embed/kXK1JHgdGKiI0
Darwin had his doubts about his own theory which he did not live to see resolved.
Christianity aimed to breed a domesticated animal among the Germanics and it succeeded.
What’s amazing is that the domestication stayed in place even after the outward forms of Christianity were dropped. People who want to be doormats will find a way to rationalize it.
Ever notice how Christians who now actually smirk at faith in God, but are firm believers in secular humanism and call it Christianity seem to evince the traits you mention?
It’s ain’t Christianity at fault… it’s having abandoned Christianity that makes mice of men.
One could speculate that all the he-men of the Viking era went a-viking and settled in other lands (Normandy, Ireland, Kiev, etc., etc., etc.)… and only the namby-pamby types stayed at home.
But as late as the 16th century there were still warrior Swedes willing to fight for their faith under Gustavus Adolphus.
And then there were the boys of Telemark over to the west as late as the 20th century.
Admittedly, things are looking dim… and fie on Mr. “Exciting”… a media prop by the YKWs, considering that even the name of Quisling is still spat upon these days by the man in the street.
But in the dark broods I frequently enjoy, my own Norse blood yet whispers quietly to me:
“There are yet Jomsvikings living!”
Western civ without Christ is like funk without James Brown.
The Finnish proved they still had Viking blood during the Winter War when they kicked the shit out of Soviets. The only reason the Finns stopped fighting was because they ran out of ammo…
But was Quisling really a Quisling?
http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2013/12/was-quisling-quisling.html
http://www.thisblogisdangerous.com/i-was-a-conservative-once/
I’m not here to debate the merits or Quisling, I merely mentioned the way his name is derided to this day as a traitor to his people… yet this half-a-fag Mr. Exciting holds a post in the government and nobody takes his treason and succor to the enemy to task. What’s wrong with THAT picture?
The problem with this theory is the traditionally most devout Christian areas of Europe (Italy, Spain, Ireland,etc.) have been the most resistant to the pussified “domesticaton”. They’re slowly getting progressed to death, but they are putting up a much better fight than the more traditionally protestant-turned-secular areas of Europe. Italians are the most racist whites I know, and I mean that as a compliment. Scandinavians were the last to be christianized, and have been the first to abandon it. Whatever happened to them, it wasn’t Christianity’s fault.
Thank you… maybe these antiChristian lunkheads and pseudo-historians will start paying attention instead of knee-jerking the fault to Christianity.
Thank you.
The countries you mentioned are all Catholic though. IE: Not real Christians from a Protestant perspective.
Protestantism is a whole different kettle of fish and few post protestant countries seem to be doing well.
Just sayin’ – that’s part of the point. Protestantism is a big gilded brick on the yellow brick road to atheism. “Real Christianity”, as you put it, starts and ends in Rome. Who cares who protestants think is a “real Christian”? They’re marrying fags now. They’ve always rebelled against and morphed Christianity to suit their temperament, leaving only its name to tarnish. Whatever their problem is, it was in their genes long before St. Paul was blinded by the light.
I think it was social democracy.
I lived in Russia for half of 1995, and the kiosks around Moscow played a lot of Abba. That was one of the few Western pop bands that the USSR allowed to be played before the fall, and being that they are pretty damned good and the chix are wicked hot, Abba really got a foothold in Russia.
So while I was there, I listened to Abba again. Really listened to it, and compared the world it depicted with my brutal prole childhood in upstate NY. I concluded that the Swedes didn’t have a lot of resistance. THey didn’t have much “load” between L1 and neutral, so they kind of shorted out.
The ideal childhood is one where the kid gets good training and education, including martial arts training, but spends a goodly amount of time out and about and has to get in physical fights on a regular basis, and in general his life gets a healthy amount of stress and challenge. The old Aristotlean law of moderation seems to apply here — getting a balance of formal education without being prissy and pointy headed, and getting a balance of real life in the streets without becoming a tatted up prole.
I love Abba — the women are so beautiful. Look at this:
But it’s too soft. Too social democrat.
Anni-Frid’s mum had to skip Norway for Sweden when WW2 ended, because her baby (Anni-Frid) was the child of a German soldier.
Good to see you out and about MW, how has life been since the outing? I think you would like the philosopher and esotericist Julius Evola immensely. I recommend Men Among The Ruins and Revolt Against The Modern World to start with.
Plus one.
[…] By CH […]
[…] Have Scandinavians Lost Their Minds? […]
consider what it means to allow another race of men to sing TO SING – TO SING!!! to even sing to your women and children. what does it mean to permit such a not so simple thing as your children to listen to another race of mans song.
“How would he explain this?”
http://lesswrong.com/lw/kr/an_alien_god/
It’s actually possible that today’s Scandinavians really are genetically so different in a few vital areas that they bear little behavioral relationship to their Viking ancestors, despite that it’s only been 1,000 years.
First, farming selects for a population of mostly patient, hardworking, docile sheep people, and industrialization more so. There has been farming in Scandinavia for thousands of years, but as the coldest, most remote part of Western Europe, the economy was a genetically healthier mix of hunting, herding, farming and raiding until late Viking times.
Second, as per Gregory Clark, the rule of law selects out the warrior (eg berserker) genes by executing thousands of young male criminals. This started in a big way in the High Medieval and continued until mid-Industrial times.
Third, the modern contraceptive era selects for beta genes, because betas (dads) value kids over varied sex, but alphas (cads) value varied sex over kids. That’s one reason why 90% of males sound faggier than they did even a generation ago.
“Third, the modern contraceptive era selects for beta genes, because betas (dads) value kids over varied sex, but alphas (cads) value varied sex over kids. That’s one reason why 90% of males sound faggier than they did even a generation ago.”
That was enlightening.
Fourth, the modern welfare state, going strong for three generations now, rewards women with lifetime sinecures after they rut with worthless alpha cads, so we should have more worthless alphas and fewer high-value betas after three generations.
Post-medieval alphas (womanizers) and modern betas are probably both pretty low value from the standpoint of Viking genes.
Not that we need to become Vikings reincarnate. Maybe 20% of the way.
Chechens above all else
ABBA: the women are so beautiful: AGREED.
Norge kan være en yngleplass for rasekamp.
Hvis du bli statsborger, straffen for motstanden være lys. Og norske fengsel er relativt komfortable. Se på Breivik.
what country you from?
I’m from Amerikkka, obviously. Kone min er far norge.
Too bad Syrians and Nigerians can get Norwegian citizenship more readily than Whites.
Still, the idea has merit. Recruit the warrior genes. Start a program to find lovers and mothers for their children after they’re imprisoned. That’s a well-known Heartiste meme – it would be easy. Breivik must have hundreds of offers.
Sweden sheltered tons of Jews during WW2. This is the thanks they get.
Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this? I’m open to the possibility of covert biowarfare or an unknown natural parasite infecting and damaging the minds of northern european weak whytes.
It’s a perfect storm of circumstances: implacable hostility from their own elites, police state repression, life-long submergence in liberal-Judaic propaganda from birth amounting to constant psychological warfare and dysgenics.
The Scandis with spines came to America.
PZ Myers is a giant counterexample.
“Myers/Myer” in England that I know are of irredentist bog-irish descent.
To the extent of having seen and indeed played with the old tricolours and more sinister items kept in their granddad’s attics as children, in Brum.
The explanation was a variant on the old Ellis Island question, but located more provincially on Liverpool docks during an Gorta Mór and after.
[Constable]; “Phwat is yer nam?”
[Uncomprehending monoglot gaelic peasant]: “Mayo, sor” (having assumed the dense and difficult Beurla put to him was on the question of his proximate origin. After all, his ancestry was (i) over-lengthy to recite on the spot and (ii) none of the sassenach’s damned business).
[Constable]: “Are yez all related then? Yer the hundred-and-seventeenth today. Fair enough, in the book ye go, Mr Myersur”.
“Meyer/Meyers” and “Mayer/Mayers” are also Eskimo noms-de-guerre. Yahweh only knows what their original Hebrew names were.
Not in this case. Haven’t detected any Judaism from him, just lots of extreme Leftist SWPLism.
But but but. It’s GOT to be dem Joos, no???
Can’t agree with you there. Many Swedes and Norwegians settled in Minnesota where they also invite the mud flood. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Somalis_in_Minneapolis%E2%80%93Saint_Paul
LUTHERANS. Not founding stock Germanics. USA founding stock Germanics were Hussite/Mennonite/Anabaptist Christians.
Thanks for pointing that out, HJ – I should have included it on my list.
Unfortunately, much of the white gene stock in America is deteriorating rapidly too, due to reasons 1-3, plus the relative ease with which losers have been able to make it on a new continent. However, we probably remain a little ahead of Whites in Europe, especially due to the vigorous strain known variously as ‘Border Scots,’ ‘Ulster Scots’ and ‘Scots-Irish’. They are a signficant part of the White American gene pool.
The lowland Scots were a tough bunch. Living in the “no man’s land” of the English-Scottish border required them to band together by blood relation or suffer ruin as armies passed through every few years. These Scots were raiders & opportunists; their unfortunate location made farming — and quite frankly, high culture — very difficult to sustain for long.
I like to think of Fisher’s three Anglo-American folkways of Puritan/Quaker, Southern Planter and Scots-Irish as Anglo-Saxon, Anglo-Norman and Anglo-Scottish in character, respectively. Related in turn to Mercia, Wessex and Northumbria, respectively.
Today, whether they’re kicking gypsies out from ‘sanctuary’ in traitorous Belfast churches, providing the heart of the rifle-shooting portion of the US military, or demonstrating for the Stars and Bars, the Border Scots are the last people on earth who have an Anglo portion to their identity, to show any guts.
Cross burning was their tradition… whenever they settled on land, they burnt a cross as a way of saying they consecrate the land with their faith and blood and vow to shed said blood in its defense.
The “Unblessed Hand”, like the Horseman’s Word, is still a thing, round here, just remembered by real ancient coffin-dodgers.
I’ve drunk, many many years ago, with old ploughmen who had the scars of the trace-chain struck across the back of their (left, I think) hand as boy apprentices.
Incomers tolerated, although under suspicion. What misfortune in life, or great crime, would drive any sensible person to hide away here in the sub-arctic arse-end of Britain?
The locals are very polite if a bit tight-fisted and less-than-chatty … as long as you mind your manners. Then all bets are off.
“Blood-feud”, “deadly-feu’d”, “black-mail”, “man-rent” and many similar technical terms are all Borders-speak.
I suppose they wouldn’t have wanted to change much, once they got Over There, especially after the worst ones were deported en masse to Ireland to form a brutal, mobile, Cossack-like defensive penumbra to mainly Tudor/Stuart settlement in John Bull’s Other Island, and sent away west (Barbadoe’d) when it became apparent that Civilisation was not for their kind.
Gypsies (real ones, not pikeys) are still just about a distinct tribe and respected (a common love of horses, thieving, boxing etc.). All settled and intermarried by now I guess. Only took 500 years.
It was the Democratic-Judeo-Bolshevik victory of 1945: http://conswede.blogspot.com/2008/07/social-paradigms-shift-eg-our-view-on.html
To illustrate what I talk about. Louis Armstrong visited Sweden in 1933. In all the news papers he was describe as something monkey-like let loose from the jungle. All across the line! And in the reviews by the most serious music critics.
Who would have imagined in 1933, that twelve years later Western Europe would undergo an America-led cultural revolution which would lead to the common belief that there are no differences between races?
Translation of two of the quotes:
Knut Bäck in Göteborgs-Posten, November 1933:
“This world is strange… No protests are raised against how the jungle is let loose into the society. Armstrong and his band are allowed to freely wreak destruction.”
Sten Broman in Sydsvenskan, November 1933:
“Dare I say that he at times had something monkey-like about him and sometimes reminded of, according to our perceptions, a mentally disturbed person, when he pouted with his mouth or gaped it to its widest open and roared like a hoarse animal from a primeval forest.”
The third quote compares the concert with a natural disaster, and Armstrong’s trumpet with a hell machine. The only good thing coming out of it, he says, is that it solves to old dispute of whether monkeys have a language.
This is what Europe looked like, up until 1945. And since some people will live under the misconception that this was a phenomenon of the ’30s, I here provide a quote from the Swedish Encyclopedia, Nordisk Familjebok, the 1876-1899 edition (here and here).
“Psychologically the negro can be said be on the level of a child, with vivid fantasy, lack of endurance, … can be said to lack morality rather than being immoral … etc.”
Even though the point here has been to illustrate how social paradigms can shift completely in short time (and this is just one out of numerous examples), let me add how up until 1945 all the focus was put on the differences between races, and after that all the focus has been put on what is equal (while ignoring differences).
I think Norwegians are high empathy (feeling others pain) and high in status signalling. Lots of cultures signal status with flashy displays. Not Scandinavians. Scandinavians signal their high status by how generous they are. Which is fine, until an amoral hoard comes to take advantage of you.
I see it with liberals everywhere. Spending money to dress like they’re poor or working class. Telling people how guilty you are about anything and everything. Voluntourism. There’s no utilitarian goal here. It’s about telling people how generous you can afford to be. It’s an ingrained identity.
They do, however, move the hell away from the ghetto when they get a chance. You wouldn’t believe how many young liberals moved away from my original , very black, city, only to proclaim loudly how proud they are to be from the black city. (from their, new, gentrified neighborhood) It makes them feel like they’re standing shoulder to shoulder with the “oppressed”, without having to actually interact with them.
“Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this?”
Chalk it up to Sweden and most Western nations swallowing the suicidal, all-or-nothing ideology of Utopianism aka Marxism.
What we are all watching here is Jonestown(don’t forget Jim Jones was a rabid Marxist, albeit in a “Christian” sort of way, think a Protestant version of Liberation Theology) repeated on national scales. The Norwegian Marxists would rather see several million of their fellow Norwegian raped and murdered rather than admit they were wrong. Marxists really believe this. It’s why Marxists from the Soviet Union, Communist, China, and Cambodia had no problem immolating their populations. If Marxists can actually create Heaven on Earth then those millions of murdered lives were worth it.
The Norwegian Marxists would rather see several million of their fellow Norwegian raped and murdered rather than admit they were wrong.
I may have to give you that one…
But it wasn’t until relatively recently that the Scand countries had anything but other Scands to deal with, hence their socialism-on-steroids… it’s easy to put up with ponying up half your money when its going to folks that look and for the most part act like you.
We’ll see what the future holds as they learn what it’s really like to deal with The Other. So far the situation doesn’t look good, but Nordics are slow to anger and slow to act.
But when they do, you get the likes of a Brevik, so imagine a few hundred… hell, a few thousand maybe… like him bursting onto the scene one day… like the Vikings suddenly erupted onto Europe some 1200 years prior.
Norwegians call it Peer Gynt Syndrome… there’s a burst of world-class activity (gold medals at the Olympics, Nobel Prizes, etc.) and then they go back to sleep for a decade or so.
Very true, I should have noted the issue of Norway’s relative isolation. Despite the death-cult of Marxism that’s taken hold in Norway and elsewhere in the West, I still have hope that there are just enough proper Norwegians(& Westerners) who see things clearly, know what to do to defend themselves as a race, culture, and nation, have the tools, and the will to do it.
My point is that the ideology of Marxism demands that everything they believe in(in this case, multiculturalism) is true, or it’s all false. I think that’s why Marxists are so ready to massacre others or go all Jonestown and commit suicide. It’s either one or the other. Either they create Utopia on the blood of millions or they destroy themselves so they can avoid that they’re ever wrong.
Hey, Brevik is taking a correspondence graduate program in PoliSci– what do you make of this? It could be an extraordinary black knighting opportunity.
Scandinavian society, too weak to protect its daughters from African rape, is also too weak to “protect” itself from its nationalist saviors.
Which tells me Brevik and the Breviks to come could win . . . .
Breivik killed only 60 or so. So, “a few thousand Breiviks” would only give a multiple of 60K dead. The leftists + the moosleemz + the shitskins are a bunch of 10s millions. That’s a big difference IMO. Conceptually we’re nowhere we need to be, yet.
We will.
Breivik killed only 60 or so. Breivik killed only 60 or so. So, “a few thousand Breiviks” would only give a multiple of 60K dead. The leftists + the moosleemz + the shitskins are a bunch of 10s millions. That’s a big difference IMO. Conceptually we’re nowhere we need to be, yet.
I thought the number was closer to 75, but the point is, these were “yutes” of the Cathedral, at a “summer camp” that was not just for paddle-boating and archery, but indoctrination as well.
His target was an effective one, from a military standpoint… killing off saplings before they could become strong trees in the service of the enemy, and sending a chilling psyop message to the elders of the Cathedral that their perfidy can and would be visited upon them AND their families. “Sins of the father”, as it were.
The point is, numbers don’t necessarily mean a lot if the targets you strike are “head” targets rather than “body”.
Whatever side you wish to come down on in re the Breivik operation, it’s military effectiveness was far more advanced than the usual “terrorist” lashing out of disenfranchised individuals.
Such an invasion could be countered by three little words: Poisonous beard mites. Maybe give the Amish a heads up.
“Have Scandinavians Lost Their Minds?”
They lost their sovereignty in 1945, like most of Europe. Consider all the ridiculous things that come out of their masters’ mouths in Washington.
One of Brevik’s primary complaints was that the prettiest Norwegian women were choosing Pakistanis over Norwegian men. The Pakistanis were from Britain…
“Choosing”? Is that why there are so many rapes?
I don’t remember every word from his manifesto, but I seem to recall his major peeve was, growing up, that there was an awful lot of bullying of his friends by gangs in the schools, surprise, surprise… although he himself had numerous outlander friends and was spared much of it.
This was also one of the motivations of Harold Covington devoting his life and efforts to “The Cause”.
There was both in his manifesto. Overt rapes as well as choosing (Norwegian women getting tingles).
Both are bad, but for different reasons.
All of HAC’s novels, even those which are not explicitly racial such as his recent Give Me The Night, have been banned from Amazon with no reason given.
However, his essential quartet of NWF novels can be found online in PDF free of charge. I make it a point to donate modestly but regularly to his Northwest Publishing Agency.
HAC walks the talk and is one of the few activists who understands the inescapable and absolute necessity of a White homeland for the survival of White Folk and the corollary necessity for plain old physical courage.
http://gatesofvienna.net/2013/05/everything-you-have-learned-in-school-is-wrong/ explains it.
Good link, jr… should be required reading… diagrams how, even when Norwegian boys try to fight back, their own folk dissuade them or outright stab them in the back.
A more virulent form of what happens in American schools, where, when some white kid tries to stand up to bullying in, say, the lunchroom, the teachers and monitors almost beg him to be quiet and ignore it and go sit off somewhere else, lest the whole chimp brigade starts ooking and eeking.
Ask me how I know.
HAC’s White homeland solution contains within it the seeds of its own destruction. Because by conceding everything that Whites built and retreating to an outlying retreat Whites are by default providing their enemies with the resources (finance, military etc.) to destroy the homeland any time they want.
Savant, if you have a better plan, I’m sure HAC would love to hear it… as would we all.
Your concerns have been addressed, and numerous times at that, by both his writings and the party literature they publish.
And with a bit of luck and pluck in real the political and socio-economic state of the remaining crumbling empire, and the technology to provide a credible deterrent to attacks against said Homeland (can you say nukes and other “Star Wars” types of weaponry yet to be developed), the proposed Northwest Homeland could easily survive and thrive.
Look at modern Israel… true, they have a tremendous advantage in having “friends in high places” all over the world, but even the hint of nukes and willing to use them in a Doomsday scenario seems to be going a long way in keeping the wolves from the door.
Where did Brevik say that?
Yeah, I’m smelling a bit of a cuck troll by Strapon2… I don’t remember reading it in the manifesto either.
God only knows how many Nationalist saviors like Breivik are patiently trolling the Interwebz as we speak.
For the lulz, check out #cuckservative and #whitegenocide
I live in Britain and dont see many british women choosing pakis or negroes. Only fatties and crazies with low self esteem.
Leave it to Strapon2 to sound off on interracial cucking, and otherwise make it seem much more popular and tingly than it is.
He and whiskey are birds of that feather.
I think you meant toe-curling?
Your Eskimo Mama curled her toes when that big Alabama Black Snake went slithering up her rectum. LOL’ed.
Yo just jealous, bro.
On a more (less?) somber note, what the hell is wrong with Scandinavians? Was the fight culled out of them so thoroughly by the loss of their sterner viking brothers to adventures afar that today they LITERALLY welcome their civilization’s cucking on a mass scale?
You can’t be serious, CH. Let’s see, I also saw this written by the Christian Jayman on his blog. Once again: Americans should not talk about other countries, you know so little.
The Vikings. Every time Americans talk about Scandinavia they mention the Vikings, evidence of their ignorance. There has been a thousand years of history after that, such as the Great Nordic War where Russia’s invasion of Sweden was prevented, and such as Swedes doing much to win the Thirty Years War for protestantism by taking more than 120 southern German cities, crushing the Spanish superpower of the era. Scandinavian nations are at the forefront of innovation and scientific discovery along with e.g. the Netherlands, Germany, Britain and the U.S. – all with much larger populations. But no, it’s “the Vikings” followed by “mass immigration”, that’s all you know. Hm.
The Vikings, of course, came back home, most of the time. Some founded Dublin and conquered England and Normandy, but most came back home as they were traders. There have been more English Medieval coins found in Scandinavia than in England. I doubt they mailed those coins to the families back home. And even if each and every Viking had stayed on other shores, how would that change the behavior back home? Regression toward the mean says it wouldn’t. So do the centuries of war after that, keeping northern Europe safe from the Asiatic Russians, like Germany and Austria defended the center.
In WWII plenty of Danes, Norwegians and Swedes volunteered to fight with Germany and Finland against the communist hordes. Americans on the other hand fought for the communists. So perhaps the question should be “Have Americans Lost Their Minds?” It was America, led by the communist Roosevelt and a White House full of Tribe advisers (most infamously Morgenthau who planned to exterminate all Germans), that destroyed the West. Under the name of “liberty” of course.
Do we really need to state the importance of Hollywood’s brainwashing machine over and over again, or will people eventually learn? Why not simply read what Hollywood types themselves have to say in the matter? They brag about how they have “defeated racism” in the West.
Additionally, speaking of Sweden in particular, the government had a monopoly on schools, universities, radio and television from WWII to the 1990s, which made sure the brainwashing would destroy conservatism. Despite that only 15 percent of Swedes call themselves “feminists” in a poll – probably the same number as in the rest of the West.
North European nations have always been less criminal and corrupt than the rest of the world, so people trusted their governments. Unlike in certain other countries where people could only trust la famiglia, and saw government as simply the biggest crime syndicate in town. When governments were hijacked by the media bosses’ allies, Germanics were therefore particularly affected by this, whereas the more criminally minded populations elsewhere kept distrusting authority like they had always done. Ironic. The more criminal and violent the people, the more resistant to the globalist brainwashing. Criminals don’t like competition from rival gangs.
Why? Because it serves their perverse interests to be apparatchiks of multiculturalism. They are tools of the Jews and they have benefited greatly from his malevolence.
Norwegians are a lot more conservative and ethnocentric than people think. I’m part Norwegian, and grew up around a lot of Norwegian immigrants. They were some of the most right-wing Americans I knew.
The thing is that Scandinavians are extremely indulgent toward their women and feminine sensibilities, and it’s considered bad form to offend them.They are extraordinarily patronizing. This goes back to pre-literate times, BTW; even Tacitus noted how indulgent Germanics were toward their women.
So what Norwegians are doing is being “polite,” because a nod toward universalist BS is considered being nice to girls. The Swedes, on the other hand, have gone authoritarian with it, and that’s the bigger danger by far.
Norwegians have quietly been looking out for their people, and doing a far better job of it than most Europeans. When you hear the odd bit of BS it isn’t at all representative of the national consensus. Consider that Breivik’s slaughter didn’t lead to a backlash against the right, but rather the left that he targeted. Compare that to the American reaction to the Roof shooting.
“Recent” immigration to Scandinavia has been approved by the MASTERS behind the curtain (you know who THEY are) (“We’ll trade you three blue-eyed blondes for your nine Somalis and Pakis).
But it’s not just Scandinavia, it’s everywhere. Floodgates are wide open. You don’t even realize because you lack first-hand experience, but the situation on Euro grounds is dire. There is a silent INVASION OF EUROPE happening right now right in front of our eyes. I was in Belgrade not long ago, and the central part of town (especially parks and streets around the train/bus station) was overrun, I repeat overrun by these “migrants”. IN BELGRADE! A city (country) that never attracted huge numbers of anyone foreign.
Apparently, the word has spread that the “Balkan route” is the easiest/safest way to go these days, so everyone and their Farouk is making a mad dash. It was mesmerizing; as far as eye could see it was crawling with wind-swept, bloodshot-eyed characters, high on life, Afghan poppy, and ISIS directives. And you could tell, they are just there bidding their time before their last hoorah towards Hungary. After they get into Hungary, they are officially in the EU and can travel to other EU countries without oversight.
So I moved in, and talked to a bunch of them. Listen to this: Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Kurdistan, Libya, Kosovo, Ethiopia, Congo, Sudan, Mali, Nigeria, etc.
Where are they heading? Most responses given to me were (in no particular order): Germany, Sweden, Austria, Netherlands, UK, France… None of them. Not single one of the dozens I talked to wanted to stay in Serbia or Hungary (or Macedonia/Greece/Turkey prior to that). They are all gunning for countries with welcoming pussies of Helgas and Ulrikas, as well as strong social safety nets. So it really isn’t about them getting away from the “unspeakable” sectarian violence in their countries, but about them getting bang (ha!) AND their buck.
How bad is this situation? So bad that Hungary has unilaterally already built a fence on its entire border with Serbia, and did it so completely disregarding EU orders (god willing, going up any day now). But you know how things are with rats and cockroaches. You put a barrier, they go around it. HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS are on track to arrive through all routes THIS YEAR ALONE (100,000 have already crossed into Hungary so far this year).
All of them are undocumented (confirmed: they threw away passports long time ago), unchecked, in some cases they even burned their fingertips so that authorities won’t be able to fingerprint them (and potentially refuse them later on for not asking for asylum in first safe country (Turkey/Greece).
Things to consider: how many of these Syrians/Iraqis arriving in Europe are actually ISIS operatives, or at least ISIS-fed drones? How many of those espec. Africans are biohazardous ticking bombs of exotic kind? How will native populations (not counting herbs) react to this, once they wake up to it?
Can you say: WAR? What is it not good for?
Here’s Mr. Exciting himself:
https://www.ssb.no/en/forskning/ansatte/_image/118099.png?_encoded=2f66666666666678302f35382f29302c352e302c3636322c303432286b636f6c62656c616373&_ts=13f18936fb8
https://www.ssb.no/forskning/ansatte/_attachment/118225/label/source?_ts=13f1899d858
He may not be fey… but he’ll do until fey gets here.
Hitler’s revenge.
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/2660
Its the endocrine disruptors so prevalent in the food. The estrogen levels in the men here in the West has reached levels never known in times past.
Ubiquity of Plastics. See Otaku of Japan, herblings of South Korea and Coastal China. Female driven “feeling” mass consumerism and advertising. See also the very hierarchical, task-oriented Western/NE Asian society putting up Jonestown like suicide cults for Utopia. Jews will be among the first slaughtered in a Muslim majority Scandinavia, or Europe. [The best thing for Jews is a solid, 100% Scandinavian nation, not Omar and Abdullah going on Jihad.] After them, other Whites. But the pull of Utopia is strong — the idea that all men and women are one, united, brothers and sisters like the Colors of Benetton. The Roman Empire, Christianity, Marxism, Cultural Marxism, all expressions of the pre-existing tendency to want a “flat” utopia amidst Seinfeldian complexity of social rules.
Early Christians nearly wiped themselves out with the Celibacy thing, and Jews via converts started to outnumber Christians in the Roman Empire. St. Augustine had lots of followers, the Church had to act or get wiped out like the Shakers. Universal Brotherhood of Man garbage is part of Westerner’s Cultural DNA. Not destiny but has to be acknowledged in order to be countered for survival.
You just can’t spell “WhisKeY” without “YKW”. Like frigging clockwork.
whiskey, I love you man, but friggin’ MAKE A NEW FRIGGIN’ POST ON YOUR BLOG.
He needs to make a new effort at shilling as well…
His same ol’ same don’t-pay-attention-to-the-men-behind-the-curtain deflections, “It’s the Puritans and that gal who wrote Frankenstein!”, coupled with his negro cuck fetishes, wear on the patience.
“The best thing for Jews is a solid, 100% Scandinavian nation, not Omar and Abdullah going on Jihad.”
Depends on which Jews you’re talking about. If it’s the ordinary Jew in the street, indeed this is the case. But if you’re talking about the Hochjuden plotting to destroy traditional White society then no, they don’t care much about the ordinary Jew and see the Muslim wreckers as doing the main task nicely
One would think these disingenuous shills or naive well-wishers would understand by now that when we RAY-CISS NAH-ZEES speak of YKW, it’s the Hochjuden we’re addressing as the enemy, not the local kosher butcher.
Sure they do not care for kosher butcher
Look at France recent election and how LICRA (French equivalent of AIPAC) has stand up against Marine LePen and FN despite several killings of ordinary eskimos in last few years by mudslims
and despite the fact that LePen almost knelled before them
For those who read French
http://www.licra.org/fr/pourquoi-front-national-est-il-toujours-dangereux
The parasite is their unlimited altruism. Nothing new. Why places where are not Jews are the most welfarized and multicultularilised?? Spain and Scandinavian countries haven’t Jews but have a lot of Muhammads, Obuga Mobugas, Wang Changs and more vibrant nouns. Jews are not the cause, the cause is pathologic altruism.
You are dumb and blind.
http://isteve.blogspot.com/2009/03/we-can-only-hope-title-of-this-2008.html
The Bonnier family owns more than 90% of the print media in Sweden. Swedish they are not.
Lerner-Spectre, shown in GBFM’s first video (first comment here) also operates in Sweden.
Wake up white man
what time is it?
We are awake, but enslaved. Just this weekend I met white men from Russia, Macedonia, and Hungary. After beginning a conversation tentatively to feel each other out as to whether anyone was an Eskimo, and learning that we were all Caucasians, we talked openly, and I saw once again that all normal white men know the deal. We know that the Eskimos control the media, control the printing of money, push degeneracy and anti-family/anti-children/anti-women policies at every turn (it is an attack on women to tell them they should be in the infantry or slaving away in an office instead of enjoying the tremendous joy that comes with being a wife and mother), and that the Eskimos *are* the “Soviets” of the USSR, the Bolcheviks, who killed, what, 30 million white people? I love when I get to meet Europeans. It gives me the opportunity to spread the word that when they think of “Americans” and “bad American policies”, they are seeing the Eskimo, not the enslaved 60% of us who are whites of European descent. We are enslaved the same as Hungary, etc was enslaved by the USSR from 1945 until 1989 — we don’t quite have absolute lack of freedom of speech or assembly, or disappearances of fathers to Siberia yet, but it’s getting close.
I also met these men’s wives–a Russian, Macedonian, and Hungarian, and these women: were thin and beautiful, had no tattoos, are married with children, and actually understood all of these political concepts. They understand the Eskimo problem too.
Contrast our American women — most of them cannot come close to understanding these things. All they know how to do is (1) be fat; (2) get at least 4 gross tattoos; and (3) spout “racist” and “that’s hateful” as they’ve been brainwashed.
Our American women need to be helped to wake up. The contrast with white European women, at least of the Russian/Hungarian (former USSR states) variety is sharp: it is as if the foreign women get it — they understand that their white men need support, love, support, and support, so we can fight the battles. They want us to reclaim our white nation.
Whereas the white American women who have grown up since 1980 have done nothing but fight, antagonize, and generally not support and outright oppose their white men, while not giving us our rightful children and families, as they’ve been taught.
The situation right now is nothing short of horrific, if you think about it.
THE JUDAISTS ARE BEHIND THE ALIEN INVASION.
Thanks for the interesting article. The Judaists are behind it.
You can see Jewish woman Barbara Lerner Spectre advocating genocide and destruction of European whites, specially Swedes, by inciting the alien invasion, here:
http://www.henrymakow.com/a_letter_from_sweden.html
The Judaists hate whites, especially white Christians. The Judaists are brainwashed by the Rabbis from childhood that they are a special race called “Jews” (when, in fact, they are mostly whites whose ancestors converted to Judaism in the Middle Ages).
The Rabbis rape the Jewish girls and boys.
Incest is rampant amongst the Judaists. Most Rabbis are rapists and they need a big congregation to have a good supply of pretty girls and even boys to rape.
See:
http://truthtellers.org/alerts/The-Great-Raping-Rabbis-Cover-Up.html
The Rabbis are afraid that if the Judaists realize they are whites, they may stop believing they are “Jews”, leave Judaism and the Rabbis and their leaders will not have a base of Jewish sheep to exploit and rape.
So the Rabbis and the leaders con them that they are not really whites, they are “Jews” from Africa, children of Abraham (who was a pimp and sold his wife to a negro pharaoh) and the whites are anti-semites who tried to exterminate them in the Holocaust, so it is best to destroy them by inciting 3rd world aliens to invade their countries so the aliens will rape and murder the whites instead.
The rabbis and Jewish leaders thus keep brainwashing them and poison their mind against their own white race.
The Judaists, thus physically and mentally raped by the rabbis, become savages, and start hating their own white race and try to destroy it by inciting 3rd world aliens (most of whom are killers and rapists) to invade their countries and attack whites.
The Judaists are truly mentally deranged psychopaths.
Jewish money controls the media in Norway & other western countries, telling people what to think & dictating who is evil and who’s not. “Racists” are considered evil, and if you are one you loose mating opportunities due to being ostracized.
On a more (less?) somber note, what the hell is wrong with Scandinavians? Was the fight culled out of them so thoroughly by the loss of their sterner viking brothers to adventures afar
Western Europe, state formation, and genetic pacification
Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this?
I think HBD Chick’s work has the evolutionary explanation covered. See:
The Rise of Universalism | JayMan’s Blog
This link originally came from an interview with F Roger Devlin.
(At the bottom of one of the essays about Devlin’s new book Sexual Utopia in Power were the following reviews if you don’t know who Devlin is:
“. . . outstanding (and MSM blacked out) essays on gender dynamics . . .”
During the interview this topic was discussed:
“Article about girls in Norway submitting to Pakistani immigrants who bully Norwegian boys”
The discussion of this subject begins at 46:30 in the interview:
http://www.starktruthradio.com/?p=1430
And they discuss this article from a Norwegian source that the Norway MSM refused to publish despite the fact checking that verified the veracity of the claims:
http://gatesofvienna.net/2013/05/everything-you-have-learned-in-school-is-wrong/
The word “bully” is sort of erroneously used. What happens is packs of Somalis or Pakis find a single Norwegian who refuses to be cowed and viciously attack him. One guy had to have teeth re-implanted. From the essay:
“A few weeks ago,” he says, “I was entering the schoolyard. They were attacking Lars. There’s a whole heap of them. They always attack as a group. They are dogs, they hunt in packs. They are beating him up. I run in between them and I punch one of them. Then someone comes rushing to and separates us, and yet again I’m being hauled off to the principal’s office, and yet again I am being told that even if they punch us we are not supposed to retaliate. Do you know how insanely provocative such a statement is?”
They always attack in packs. And those boys that fight back are punished by the administrations of schools and towns. But the key assertion by Devlin and in the Norwegian article is that the immigrants never fight a fair fight, then will cower away from a fight of equal numbers. But if they catch a Norwegian alone then they attack when the odds favor them.
And another key is given the atomization of Nordic society, this boy is often alone or has few friends, often the single child of a single mother. And he has to tangle with muslims who have large families and are part of a larger ethnic group. One of the guys had to join a motorcycle 1% type gang to find allies.
What Devlin states is that this creates the idea in the minds of young Norwegian girls that the immigrants are more masculine, more dominant than the Norwegian men (and Devlin states the same is true in Sweden). And Devlin states that the sex workings in the minds of women are so primitive, so off, that they spurn their men and go with immigrants who use them when they are young and tight, but then go off to marry a Muslim woman.
We can see similar things here in America. And to me it seems this sort of racial sexual guerrilla warfare occurs in a less combative version, but it still occurs.
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
To ask the question is to answer it.
I personally think that somewhere in the Neanderthal genome is a racial suicide gene. Would explain low birth rates in North Asia and Europe and the insect like breeding rates of blacks. Modern Jews are from the Kazakh area so are also effected. They will get wiped out eventually between blacks killing them and the muslims killing them. Nukes won’t even dent either population in 2100.
The nutty psychiatrist Rapaille said Germans are “up to your throat” or “down on their knees”.
If crime stats are anything to go by then NW europeans are indeed extreme types. They have a “high breaking point”, but once they do break then all hell breaks loose.
Not coincidentally, some NE asians can be like that too, perhaps even more so.
Might be the gene for “justice.”
That is, the NW Euros might have a gene that requires overwhelming evidence before punishment of the bad guy is there. Beyond a reasonable doubt sort of thing.
But once the proof is overwhelming…bang.
let’s hope.
genocide rape!
I am staunchly pro-life, but my God, I just wanna abandon my principles and scream “Genocide Rape FTW!” at the top of my lungs.
Or “helmet-germans” and “briefcase-germans”, as the Frogs know and are wary of. Still germans, doing german stuff, innit? Only the dress code varies.
NW Euros have a higher organization unit. Nations>>clans.
Were greater than, until the Eskimo puppetmasters infiltrated and started pulling the strings of their “Useful Idiot” marionettes.
White people have forgotten what it’s like to live in the state of nature. Hopefully third world vibrancy will jog their racial memory.
Someone above made an interesting comment about ‘the most beautiful norwegian women going to immigrants’.
F. Roger Devlin explains this. He claims that this is the result of women’s keen sense for who is at the top of the social dominance scale, combined with the current deference among europeans. He gives the example of similar “racially-charged” insults (going both ways), which only whites must not dare utter. This marks them as submissive in the eyes of the women.
women’s senses are not keen
No, they go after white alphas.
It wasn’t an “interesting comment”, it was a cuck troll…
And now you’ve given that disinformation further legs.
You fairy.
Maybe I can go to Norway and get me some Viking pussy? Do they have Doritos and Malt Liquor there? Or crack?
Take them, subhuman; they’re worthless now.
Swedish rape!
If you find anything lacking, just ask and it will be provided. While maybe not the brightest, we’re very good hosts.
On second thought, pass. They are not fat, pierced or tatted.
““It is very exciting to watch Norway’s White population displaced by Middle Eastern lunatics and Norway’s white women raped by the tens of thousands by these vibrant newcomers.””
Oh come on.
MEer are not lunatics and being more likely to be rapists isn’t being a rapist.
Those things are peaks, but not really things you need to worry about. I know this is rhetoric designed to elicit a response, but getting raped or blown up is not really what makes aliens flooding into your country an undesirable experience.
My nephew tells me he doesn’t wish to go out because he is surrounded by gypsies who are incapable of civilized behavior. It makes you think that pogroms would be pretty cathartic – AND IT’S NOT EVEN MY COUNTRY!
(btw, my nephew is not really religious, pretty well behaved and smart, so shove the “he is part of the problem” thing)
Oh and the reason for Scandinavian cuckoldry is probably because of their gay ass inclusive collectivism. Others are collectivist but exclusive (Chinese, middle eastern), or inclusive but individualist (Brits). These guys like sharing, but barely have a in/outgroup sensor.
In case it was unclear: low level things like having alien tongue speaken in your city, being surrounded by people whose behavior you cannot predict etc (i.e. the stuff that Putnam mentions) is the most significant problem with “diversity”, not rape or terrorism.
It’s like living in an airport.
I think that is true. This should be highlighted. Whether immigrants are committing violent crime or not isn’t even the most expansive problem with “diversity.” The more prevalent problem is just what you said, day-today-day unpredictable behavior the others. I just makes life unlivable. No country on earth should be overwhelmed with 10s of thousands or more people of completely different cultures. There has always been a small amount of healthy immigration from and to all countries but what is going on in the west is an invasion led by the YKWs.
ho – OUTSTANDING POINTS – and imagine being stranded in an airport in, say, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho, versus being stranded at JFK in JYC, JY.
Oh and the reason for Scandinavian cuckoldry is probably because of their gay ass inclusive collectivism.
Yeah, I suspect the only reason those people lasted as long as they did is because of their isolation from everyone else.
They certainly didn’t have a cultural immune system which protected them against the Eskimo Bonner family or Eskimo financiers like Olof Aschberg.
” or inclusive but individualist (Brits).”
Romantic writer Louis de Bernieres ( sp?) was on the radio a couple of days ago, relating how a Frog artist of his acquaintance was lamenting the stultifying “sameness” of Benelux, France, Iberia, and contrasting it with his amusing aventures brittaniques. How so?, says our Louis (ancestrally huguenot, therefore basically a Frog himself).
“Mais c’est un asylum immense!” chortled our stripey-jerseyed, pointy-mustachioed onion-chewer.
Blighty is decidedly not a haven for the sensitive, haughty or weak-minded, pace the myths of decent chaps in derby hats sipping Earl Grey. Or for anyone who feels the cold, and likes to wash more than once a week in warm-ish water. Much as we’d like it to be so, nature is against us.
I am also partial to the theory that it was lost in translation. In German and other languages, excitement can be something negative. “Getting mad/agitated” in German means “sich aufregen”, i.e. to get excited. But you never know.
if we had the real quote in Norwegian I could tell the connotation
I’m not sure if the denotation of aufregen can encompass ‘excited’, but I always heard it used (and translated it in my mind) as ‘aggravated’ or ‘angry’… never mistaken for any good connotation of ‘excited’.
Alas, I don’t know enough Norwegian to discern whether his quote was truly ‘good’ excited or not… I’m guessing it was, judging by his looks, and the info that the governments and the MSM allow to escape.
It literally means “to excite”. It’s true that “sich aufregen” pretty much always means “getting mad/aggravated” but “Ich bin aufgeregt!” would mean “I am excited!”.
Outside chance that it is something like that, but I wouldn’t expect it. It’s hypothetically possible.
The fact that we’re not hearing any uproar about it from the Cathedral pretty much seals the deal that it gave the fey squarehead tingles… more’s the pity.
It is said, “Necessity is the mother of invention”. Necessity is desire so if you desire a change, I suggest making the change that affects tomorrow. The butterfly affect is true indeed.
PS: This guy is good at explaining the butterfly affect. Enjoy it. It is worth watching. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mo6fBAT8f-s
Political correctness is a religion in Sweden. Its a twisted form of Christianity, you got the original sin “You are born evil because you are white…colonialism…Hitler etc”. You have the guilt trip that clergymen have used for centuries, “You have so much! Why dont share it with the poor! They have their own martyrs ie some communist who fell victim to right wing violence. Saints as the cuck that started an anti racist organization after his daughter got killed by her african boyfriend, no joke check out: Fem i tolv.
Today the word racist is used as the word witch was during the middleages, to brand and doom the heretic who doesnt follow the Cathedrals doctrine.
That religion combined with 200 years of peace, low testosterone levels among “men” and cowardice has lead to the current state of decay.
When the civil war errupts things will change though.
It’s time to stop thinking of the Scandinavians as Nordic Viking badasses. That hasn’t been true for a thousand years. The alpha Vikings mostly settled in England and Normandy, leading to a thousand years of militant Norman-English alpha-empire building and world domination. The Swedish alpha Vikings (Russ) sailed east to the carve out the Russian Empire from the native Slavs (slaves). The beta Scandinavians had little interest in axes or longships or going berserk: they stayed home to change diapers and invent socialism, and to pass on their beta-provider genes. Viewed in that context, the influx of Mohammeds may actually be injecting a much-needed dose of manliness into the Norwegian gene pool; hence Mr Ouren’s warm glow. Do not lament the death of the Scandinavian Viking: he was burnt on his longship a thousand years ago.
r/K. The Anonymous Conservative has explained this all already: http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/
Read his books, especially this one:
http://www.anonymousconservative.com/blog/sample-page/
Sweden had the benefit of nationalized oil largesse after the savagery had been beaten out of them and democracy installed + the U.S. to police the USSR militarily (i.e. no impetus to self-defense and, therefore, manliness) + no non-whites around to correct their misconceptions through example.
This made them very susceptible to r-breeding, especially with Soviet and Eskimo encouragement.
The r-selection is now endemic, but give them an oil shortage coupled with a food price rise and watch them become K-selected.
r/K rape!
Oslo Syndrome
Our intellect can transcend our instincts. It’s the blessing and the curse of our species.
Really? You have the world at your fingertips, and you’re commenting on a blog that teaches men how to seduce women.
Is that you, Ophelia? All hail the Ancient One!
If diversity + proximity = war
Homgeneity/high-trust + resource abundance = pussification
Scandinavia is not abundant with resources. Norway didn’t always extract oil.
Norway gets 100% of it’s electricity from hydroelectric power and exports the surplus.
High trust + technology that leads to resource abundance=twink kulture
Indeed.
I see. 🙂
In 1998, the inevitability of whites being a minority in America in less than 50 years made Bill Clinton positively giddy. See his June speech at Portland State University.
Had Americans — everyday average Joes and Janes) — “lost their minds” in 1998? Of course not (while criminally miseducated they were not then and are not now racially suicidal/pathologically altruistic). These policies are planned and implemented and relentlessly marketed and re marketed exclusively by elites.
Have you ever been given the opportunity to vote on the issue of immigration? Of course not, and you never will. The issue is far too important to the owners of this country. Barbara Specter et al. 2010s is just a continuation of Jacob Javitz et al. 1960s.
Your deracination and dispossession was planned long ago and has been in the works for a very, very long time. God in the Talmud tells us who shall rightfully rule the entire earth with an iron fist. Who the fuck are you to stand in the way of God’s will?
Back to work, cattle….leave the thinking to your betters.
That weren’t God speaking.
Said Talmud is the sole property of those mentioned in John 8:44, Rev. 3:9 (and elsewhere in true Scripture, God’s Word).
Learn Scripture, then tell us about God… otherwise, you’re part of the problem… by propagating disinformation… and slandering the One True God… those hallmark tells of… well, you-know-who.
“That weren’t God speaking.” No shit, spergy?
Those who reject Logos have their own God. A God of lies and murder.
“You will know them (false prophets) by their fruits.”
I got your spergy right here. (((Sipowicz salute)))
Your post sounded like just another of the snarky atheists that clutter up the chateau with their sophistries, so if you meant it as ironic, well… try to be a bit more clever next time.
Greg: it was obvious sarcasm.
GE, I was able to get his sarcasm the first time, but he did do a d@mned good job of what I imagine to be the thought processes of the genetically psychopathically nihilistic [which would be about 110% of all Eskimos].
I knew he was being sarcastic about the tribe… (duh!)
But it seemed to me he was giving God a noodge as well, like most of the atheists around here try.
Spot on Scanman.
Foaming at the mouth a bit but point taken. The crime today is no longer the crime itself but rather the outing of it. When society has its head up its ass it take an outsider like a John the Baptist to show them the way but you know how that ended.
“Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this?”
Survival of the species has always been the job of the males of the species.
But the female’s bloodline is more likely to survive by hypergamous fornic@tion with more Alpha, more masculine males.
To save The West, we must return to a culture in which almost all men are MASCULINE. Of course, the Eskimos know this, ergo:
Just look at http://www.copsub.com to get another whiff of Scandinavian betatude.
The parasite has used them as a shit dumpster for too long to believe recovery is possible.
OTOH, wouldn’t a “Save Scandinavia” project be exciting?
I’d say “droll”, but negro fatigue has cribbled my risibility.
this was a parody, right? I honestly couldn’t tell at first.
It’s no longer the case that white populations are oblivious. “Diversity” is now so all-pervasive that even the most well meaning, “right on” liberal whites find themselves increasingly uncomfortable at the sheer scale and speed of population replacement. The wild enthusiasm that white liberals once felt for diversity has given way to half hearted platitudes and tepid self reassurances.
Amongst the ordinary rank and file of the left, there is a quiet acknowledgment that something has gone disastrously wrong. They once opined so joyously about all the benefits of 3rd world immigration; such as Chinese and Indian restaurants, cheap cleaners, and their one black friend called Sandra. But now, as these anxious middle class whites drive through city centres – places that have changed beyond recognition – something stirs within them. Approaching a red light, slowing to stop, they double check the doors are locked and avoid making eye contact. It wasn’t supposed to be like this.
The enrichment, however, will continue unabated. It does not require good will or even democratic mandate to forge ahead. It simply requires the continued cowering of people too afraid to lose their jobs, to be labelled “racist”, to become social outcasts – and so, instead, keep their mouths shut as their lineage is wiped from the Earth forever
But now, as these anxious middle class whites drive through city centres – places that have changed beyond recognition – something stirs within them.
Yep.
I have a few of these “right on” libs in my immediate family. One has been a social worker for 30 years in a very white state.
It’s fun to watch her struggle to reconcile the conflict between her inner “goodwhite”(tm) and what her eyes tell her regarding the influx of big city black drug dealers and lazy Sudanese refugees into her white town.
When things like armed robbery (by vibrants) increased and two black girls slammed a door in her face just because they thought it was funny she began to realize that maybe, just maybe, these people are uncivilized. And maybe, just maybe, they will never be civilized.
But such thoughts are verboten. She will stay silent.
It wasn’t supposed to be like this.
Nailed it.
> “It wasn’t supposed to be like this.” ——— Except that this is EXACTLY how the puppetmasters wanted it to turn out – a return to the seething turbid middle-eastern bazaars of the Iberian Caliphate and the Constantinople/Ottoman Empires, where the puppetmasters were able pull all of the strings in the background, with no one even noticing their presence.
By that token, would it too far a stretch of the imagination to imagine that Izsham was invented by the sh-eye-locks? There are photos suggesting that the leader of IS is a k-eye-ke, who met with McCain
The Eskimos love ISIS because ISIS is directing its ire at Middle Eastern CHRISTIANS. The Eskimo neocons in the Bush and Obama administrations have used the “War on Terror” to wage genocidal war on the Christians of Iraq and Syria and Lebanon and Egypt. The Eskimos hate CHRISTIANITY above all else.
All it takes for evil to triumph is good men to do nothing.
Very well-written Bigglesworth, when I see the budding ebony/ivory romances, I might not cower anymore
“Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this?”
He would tell you that this is not contrary to his claims and that these weakwhytes are going to be cleansed from the gene pool.
CH- “raise awareness” on this shitlib judge. Sounds like a naive tradcon. Adult teen guy meets lying girl for hookup, which ultimately lands guy on sex offender list with Shitavious and Central American rapists (“because quiencera!”)
The girl “victim” and her mom even had good sense to appeal for leniency for the guy. Judge condemned culture of (add it to The LIST)
“meet, hook up, have sex, sayonara. Totally inappropriate behavior.”
“Lol” – yeah, that’s called feminist/cultural Marxist America your (no) honor
http://patch.com/michigan/grossepointe/lie-lands-teen-19-sex-offender-registry-35-years?utm_source=social&utm_medium=hs&utm_campaign=
Many of the Vikings who had any fight in them invaded Britain. They built Dublin. Bred heavily into Scotland and England. Explains British military dominance throughout much of modern history.
Possibly.
Also the Normans (French-speaking Vikings).
The fascinating question: Who were the Normans? First cousins to the Vikings? And many historians believe that the Vikings also headed East and bred with Slavs and created modern Russians.
And even the Romans couldn’t conquer ancient “Pictland”. Modern Scots are [amongst other things] a mix of Picts and Dal Riatans and Vikings. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hadrian%27s_Wall
It’s no secret that Louis The Fat (or was it the Bald?), King of France at the time, gave the Vikings one-third of France to leave the other two-thirds alone… Normandy means “of the Northmen” or something close.
And it’s proven that the Swedish Vikings (called the people of Rus at the time) gave their name to modern Russia and founded the city of Kiev.
Who were the Normans? First cousins to the Vikings?
Go into Google Translate, type “Norwegians” on the English side (with the “-s” so the software doesn’t assume it’s an adjective), and translate it into Danish, Swedish, and Norwegian.
The answer is simple. Scandinavia is a matriarchal society. The shield maidens during the time of the Vikings evolved into the radical feminists living there today. Women by nature are liberal, hence a matriarchal society will become liberal over time. Just like women like to care for stray animals, they will vote to take in asylum seekers from war torn shit-holes.
I don’t think so. Shield maidens obediently served men their drink of choice.
My own daughter sent me an e-mail when that female Viking warrior article came out.
If memory serves, in reading the actual article, there was nothing about women in battle, it was merely that some women were found in graves alongside men, and they were immigrants, not warriors.
I had to explain to the little darling that the sagas and other sources were stone silent on any sort of female warriors fighting alongside their men… although I’m sure the occasional wife took a rolling pin to her hubby.
Note that mythical shield maidens never fought battles, they merely chose the slain and took them from the battlefields.
“Shield-maidens”. Total made-up late-Victorian/Hollywood horse-shit, riding into town on the back of ancient Graeco-Roman myths about Amazons and Scythian trouser-wearing high status women who dared to ride less than side-saddle.
In Beowulf, they are not. Not a whisper. The only female character of note is an Heroic Single Mother Feminist and her monstrous son.
Absent also from the generally straight-talking Iceland sagas.
While women didn’t fight much in the sagas, they could cause a lot of trouble. Njals Saga is one of the bloodiest, and it all kicks off because two women can’t agree on who should sit where at a feast.
Whether shield maidens were warriors or not it does not matter. The place is overrun with radical feminists somehow. https://youtu.be/9HwfVPmFNlg
Icelanders are awesome but my God they drink poison for liquor.
the place may be overrun with feminists but don’t slander the shield maidens. they were choosers of the slain and served mead in Odin’s hall – they weren’t proto-feminists.
This ‘Norwegian’ says “Norway is too homogeneous, too white. So there is a job to be done”. Know thine enemy. http://irishsavant.blogspot.ie/2015/03/norways-alan-shatter.html
“That’s the thing with race rucks. They ambulate through life sealed in a feels balloon that is easily punctured with a quick slash of the semantic shiv.”
How un PC of you, hurting people’s feelings!
great question. People seem to have generally lost their minds all over the west in the 20th century. There was a lot of postcolonial ideology that from what I can piece together may have started as early as the 1940’s. I haven’t figured out why yet. But Britain and France were beginning to accept large amounts of immigrants in this time. So there was a mixture of postcolonialism and radical 60’s nonsense and multiculturalism began in the 70’s and this was the same time that sweden began opening their borders so as far as I can tell, sweden felt some lefty envy and decided to copy other western nations for the feels. they are human, they are susceptible to fashion trends. People are generally liberal.
@martin
But Britain and France were beginning to accept large amounts of immigrants in this time.
You can learn about the origins of multiracialism in Britain by reading this article:
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/07/jews-the-ss-empire-windrush-and-the-origins-of-multicultural-britain/
I was dumbfounded by what I learned.
People are generally conservative. They have been indoctrinated by academia and are to cowardly not to think what everyone else thinks.
Running with the herd is just about as conservative as it gets. And if they are males then that’s doubly sickening.
Not only academia.
Urbanisation, Cosmopolitism, Contraception… The Monster is within,
Eskimo Frankfurters are merely riding the wave.
Scandinavian countries have been completely taken over by feminism. When women achieve power their nurturing instinct kicks in. They want to “save the world” and the natural role of men as rulers & guardians simply goes to the wayside.
Funny how there isn’t all this awesome immigration to Israel.
That country has the sense to have an immigration policy and protect its borders with a wall. The USA and Western Europe should do the same.
The situation in Calais is turning into a mess:
http://www.france24.com/en/20150729-france-deploys-riot-police-stem-flow-migrants-calais
Yet Eskimos advocate for open borders and mass importation of vibrants in white countries. Why is that?
Oh, right.
The fence we should build should be a low frequency invisible fence tuned to the resonance frequencies that would make the trespassers fall to their knees. You could make it directional specific. Hell, you wouldn’t even have to man the towers that would act as boosters of the signals to increase the power(Decibels) because the higher the power, the more it can do maximum damage. http://www.newworldwar.org/sw.htm
For those rah rahing over the Saxon’s hate, I think of one movie that seems to exemplify whatr you guys are talking about.
Law Abiding Citizen.
Except for the magic negro who figgers it all out. lozlzolzolozlozl
And of course, the protagonist’s invariably white targets.
Yeah that was really stupid in hindsight. Whites generally aren’t THAT depraved. Home invasions like the one you saw in the beginning is a nig pastime.
” Home invasions like the one you saw in the beginning is a nig pastime.
”
True, but that film could never be made in Hollywood.
Since we’re on cuckolding what does everyone think of this
https://www.literotica.com/s/dominated-in-brazil-ch-02
Shows that cuckolding fetish is just proxy for a masochistic brand of homosexual.
Same thing is happening in the U.K. They said the same here too, very exciting!
Yep, became the most popular boy’s name in England in 2014…
Sweden is fucked up, Norway is getting there, but I think we’re doing alright here in Denmark. We are the politically incorrect bad boy of Scandinavia.
And yet you’re providing free conselling for poor little ‘vulnerable’ ISIS beheaders returning from their jihad.
True. They actually allow the Dansk Folkeparti to write immigration law, whereas Sverigedemokraterna gets a cordon sanitaire slapped on it. And Norway is in between the two. /smh
Better buy some more ammo and firearms. Just to be sure.
“Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this? I’m open to the possibility of covert biowarfare or an unknown natural parasite infecting and damaging the minds of northern european weak whytes.”
I think the explanation is fairly straightforward… It’s an effort to have nurture trump nature. Here’s what I mean by that: There’s a fantastic book called “Warriors and Worriers”… It’s a book about the difference between the sexes.
It’s solid evopsych and the conclusions aren’t surprising: Males are more violent, competitive and are always looking for an enemy. In every study ever done, boys will gravitate to more competitive, violent activities. Take toy guns or even anything resembling a gun out of a boy’s classroom and he’ll find *something* to replace it with – he’ll pick up a doll for instance and shoot pretend bullets out of its head (true example from the book).
So if you’re part of the meddlesome global elite (think UN, USAID, liberal foundations, etc.) pushing for whirled peas, you have to somehow try and counteract the male biological instincts for violence and for always looking to define an enemy – the out group “other”.
How do you do that? 1) Push multiculturalism everywhere… “We’re all the same see! We’re part of the global community.” Encourage interbreeding and religious intermarriage to blur the physical distinctions and differences between the races/religions. Attempt to deny males a clear out group “other” they can easily define as the enemy. 2) Elevate feminine influence and de emphasize masculine influence in *everything*. Spend 5 minutes on the websites of the Ford Foundation or USAID and it’s as clear as could be… Look at the resources being devoted globally to feminists, women’s rights, etc. it will blow your mind.
The meme is simple: “male influence (their violent, competitive nature) has fucked the world up. What the world needs now is the gentleness and passivity of feminine influence.
What they are attempting to do on a global scale is Bernays-ian social engineering to trump human (and particularly male) “nature” with social “nurture”.
It’s hardly conspiratorial. Think of it as a relentless PR campaign with unlimited resources directed by foundations and governments. If PR and advertising can get us to drink Coke, they reason, why not put it to use to do the above? Social engineering is just “PR” and advertising on a different scale.
It works… At least in the short run. It will fail miserably in the long run though because no one has thought through the unintended consequences.
ATTENTION: Spread this message far and wide, copy and paste it and send it to EVERY MALE you know!
We men must boycott marriage, and never marry. Why? Because there are ZERO benefits for men in marriage. If you get married, there is at least a 50 percent chance that your wife will divorce you, kidnap your children from you, and steal all your money in divorce.
So, what are the alternatives to marriage?
1. Learn how to game and seduce women
2. Fuck prostitutes
3. Masturbate to porn
etc
Did you know that it’s cheaper to fuck a prostitute once a week than to maintain a wife? You will get bored of fucking your wife after the first six months of marriage but with a prostitute you can fuck a new one every time.
There is already a MASSIVE anti-marriage campaign worldwide, with men basically giving up on marriage and refusing to get married. Here are two recent articles on it:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-3046350/Why-men-refuse-marry-Women-complain-chaps-today-won-t-settle-Sorry-ladies-s-fault-argues-wickedly-provocative-new-book-Denigration-Men-PETER-LLOYD.html
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/05/01/why-men-wont-marry.html
Now, there are THREE main ways we can destroy feminism forever and take women off the massive pedestal they are on. We must fund and promote the following three technologies:
1. Virtual reality sex programs
2. Artificial wombs
3. Sex Robots
Once these three technologies are in place, women will no longer have any power in society. After all, why would you waste time chasing after fat women in real life when you can fuck hot supermodels in virtual reality or fuck a female sex robot? And since women’s main power comes from their reproduction capacity, if we REMOVE that capacity from women through the technology of artificial wombs, then women will have ZERO power left in society and thus feminism is finished forever.
THIS is the solution, gentlemen! Now we must do our part and spread the above message to as many men as possible so that we can raise the consciousness of men worldwide. I am the guy who created the famous Boycott American Women blog, which reached around 40 million people worldwide through the internet campaign I created. Therefore I know what I am talking about.
In summary:
Do not ever get married. Simply seduce and bang women, or fuck prostitutes, and help promote the above three technologies, and we will DESTROY FEMINISM FOREVER! Thank you!
If you still have doubts about WHY you should not get married, I strongly recommend you to read the following article:
https://dontmarry.wordpress.com/
It’s a really complicated issue, but here goes:
– Only 11% of Norwegians identify as feminists. But the ones who do are very loud and visible. Same goes with political correctness. And it’s becoming less popular and voices are much more frequent than just a decade or two ago, but there has yet to be a real paradigm shift.
– There are plenty of hard guys and feminine women in Norway, they just don’t pose in the media. For example, Norway is the only country that consistently gets more than one olympic gold per million people. Norway, with 5 million people, leads the winter olympics by a mile historically, and usually wins it or ties for first place even today (sure, the whole world doesn’t compete, but Canada, Russia, the US etc. do). Norway’s elite forces are some of the world’s best, and they’re drowning in recruits. Norway’s strongmen and powerlifters are some of the world’s best per capita, although beaten by Iceland (who are almost exclusively emigrated Norwegians). During the nazi occupation, some joined the nazis, and were considered the most fanatical of all the nazi forces, much more than the SS. During the end days of the war, when all was lost, the Wiking brigde wanted to fight until death on the Eastern front. They only unwillingly retreated back to Norway when ordrered by the nazis under penalty of execution.
– Norway is really conform. It scored the highest of all countries in Milgram’s conformity studies. Basically, if leaders decide to say something stupid, there’s a lot less of a chance that someone will object, no matter what the stupidity.
– Outbreeding has affected people. After Norway was christened, marriages within the seventh link (first is your brothers and sisters, second is your cousins etc.) were forbidden. This was done to consolidate power in the hands of a king instead of many clans. Inbreeding creates in-group attitues and ethnocentricity, outbreeding the opposite, extreme altruism.
– Norway was always altruist, but now the altruism has been increased and perverted from the group (Norwegians/Europeans) to include leechers (non working immigrants).
– It’s always been welfare orientated (dwarves have been found to reach old age in the Viking era), but now the welfare state has exploded in size and power.
– Norway has always had a lot of rights for women (rights to inheritance for example), but with feminism that’s been perverted beyond reasonable size too.
– Norway is wealthy, everyone earns a decent wage (or gets money from the state), social security is good, education is free, and there are few problems for most people. It forges a non violent, complacive attitude. War, muscles and guns are expensive. It’s more efficient to produce high technology until shit really starts to get deep. Even if you put together all immigrant crimes, Norway is very peaceful. There are usually around 40 murders a year in the whole country, always less than 1 in 100.000 people. Except for that one year of course, 2011, Breivik-year.
The book “Redbreast” by Jo Nesbo explains a lot about Norwegians that were Nazis during WWII – what you learn may surprise you!
Is it just me, or when you see pictures of dylann roof you think he looks sort of, iconic?
Unique style, guns, fringe, not smiling in photos (alpha)
I’m surprised i’m writing this, but we live in a world of such consumerist, feminized, pussy drones that the fact that he actually did something was remarkable and gives him more balls than 99.9% of anyone I know. Sorry, but this includes Heartiste, and even me, for that matter.
It’s a shame he went too far, but it’s like the excerpt from batman begins:
“If you make yourself more than just a man, if you devote yourself to an ideal and they can’t stop you, you become something else entirely – Legend, Mr Wayne…”
By chance I got to see the Poz Pride Parade in Stockholm today. Huge numbers of fags marching down the streets, including surprisingly quite a few hot college girls. (Probably recruited as allies, but a few of them looked lez til graduation, bad hair, bad clothes but reasonable looks underneath it all.)
Walking away through the stragglers, where many many mothers were having their strollers and children waving rainbow flags, all the way back to the hotel it was actually worse than I’d expected. They don’t just tolerate it, they love their poz.
Their only way to survive: Put these scenes on posters and plaster them all over the third world. SWEDEN LOVES TO EAT DA POO POO. Maybe some visitors will stay out.
Signs that a women is attracted to you.
Wide eyes
Dilated Pupils
Hair flipping/playing
Compliments shirt
Extra feminine acting
Higher pitched voice
Compliments cologne.
Does a double-take; i.e., she looks away from you then instantly looks back at you, lips parted. Effing love it when that happens. She’s yours.
Maintains eye contact for no necessary reason.
Looks away after eye contact with a pained expression on her face as if she might weep; she wants you really bad but thinks she can’t have you. I get this one a lot.
Yet I get rejected all. the. time. What’s wrong with so many women?
I get the bishes looking away with a pained look too, but that’s usually because their pepper spray jammed and they need to beat feet.
Those are beginner signs. lol I prefer: (1) sucking my dick, (2) making me a sandwich to order, (3) etc. I joke. However, I am lately able to get into the comfort phase. If you work things right, comfort materializes after about 60 seconds of actual work on target. The amount of total work in venue relevant to her seeing you as the prize is, I think, 0 seconds to 1 hour. I am learning to get into a woman’s social space with calibration. The single open is like the set open but no empty space in the middle of the circle. Do I cause little ‘offenses’? Sure, but a woman’s feelings are not sincere, only a status ruse. Might makes right. What I am saying is get past the conscious IOI tagging. To klunky and conscientious, yet you must be conscientious on the inside, only at Houston control. Get into your lower masculinity (instincts and primitive emotions) and feel these farm fresh females feel you through body language and make use of eye contact, etc. Experiment with primitive mentality and connection. They are lower than you think. Get lower mentally. Honestly, I can’t predict when a woman will just ‘turn on’ for me and go into comfort mode. I’ve been blowing my chances, but I will learn it like I learned how to navigate attraction. Work on reading by feel first and realize the body language mechanics later. Will serve you (whoever reads this) well, I promise.
It’s a really complicated issue, but here goes:
– Only 11% of Norwegians identify as feminists. But the ones who do are very loud and visible. Same goes with political correctness. And it’s becoming less popular and voices are much more frequent than just a decade or two ago, but there has yet to be a real paradigm shift.
– There are plenty of hard guys and feminine women in Norway, they just don’t pose in the media. For example, Norway is the only country that consistently gets more than one olympic gold per million people. Norway, with 5 million people, leads the winter olympics by a mile historically, and usually wins it or ties for first place even today (sure, the whole world doesn’t compete, but Canada, Russia, the US etc. do). Norway’s elite forces are some of the world’s best, and they’re drowning in recruits. Norway’s strongmen and powerlifters are some of the world’s best per capita, although beaten by Iceland (who are almost exclusively emigrated Norwegians). During the nazi occupation, some joined the nazis, and were considered the most fanatical of all the nazi forces, much more than the SS. During the end days of the war, when all was lost, the Wiking brigde wanted to fight until death on the Eastern front. They only unwillingly retreated back to Norway when ordrered by the nazis under penalty of execution.
– Norway is really conform. It scored the highest of all countries in Milgram’s conformity studies. Basically, if leaders decide to say something stupid, there’s a lot less of a chance that someone will object, no matter what the stupidity.
– Outbreeding has affected people. After Norway was christened, marriages within the seventh link (first is your brothers and sisters, second is your cousins etc.) were forbidden. This was done to consolidate power in the hands of a king instead of many clans. Inbreeding creates in-group attitues and ethnocentricity, outbreeding the opposite, extreme altruism.
– Norway was always altruist, but now the altruism has been increased and perverted from the group (Norwegians/Europeans) to include leechers (non working immigrants).
– It’s always been welfare orientated (dwarves have been found to reach old age in the Viking era), but now the welfare state has exploded in size and power.
– Norway has always had a lot of rights for women (rights to inheritance for example), but with feminism that’s been perverted beyond reasonable size too.
– Norway is wealthy, everyone earns a decent wage (or gets money from the state), social security is good, education is free, and there are few problems for most people. It forges a non violent, complacive attitude. War, muscles and guns are expensive. It’s more efficient to produce high technology until shit really starts to get deep. Even if you put together all immigrant crimes, Norway is very peaceful. There are usually around 40 murders a year in the whole country, always less than 1 in 100.000 people. Except for that one year, of course.
No, this is obvious. The leadership of these once great nations is opening their doors exclusively to people from the worst, most war-torn nations of the world. After losing wars for conquest in Europe repeatedly over the centuries, and the insult of a Norway that rather than cleaving to its’ monarch, elected Quisling and was overrun with collaborators…
The ruling class (women) has decided that the Scandinavian race must be made more warlike. Remember that Scandinavian cultures were always matriarchal, with women running society and men reduced to high risk laborious occupations. The default for Scandinavian women was to try to get babies from the men who excelled at high risk professions like fishing in the prime of their fertility, and as they aged, having the ‘survivors’, typically a synonym for ‘pussies’, raise the children of the alphas who died in war for plunder, fishing, hunting the arctic, etc.
If female desire is the driving force behind all social policies in Scandinavia (probably true) and if the hierarchy for female desire in Scandinavian countries is white scandinavian alpha > alpha from a war torn dump > beta from a war torn dump > white beta > ? (True! Look at the trip reports from scandinavia, and the preferences of the absolute hottest girls there), then the present scenario makes perfect sense.
If you have the chance to interact with actual women in actual muslim countries, you will quickly learn that Islam is very friendly to the Feminine Imperative. Alphas are shared (many wives), betas are literal cannon fodder (suicide bombers, conscripts, laborers, etc), sex is so stifled that an ugly woman can inspire a man to risk his life for the view of an ankle, and any overt expressions of masculinity inconsistent with the Feminine Imperative have high costs (man bangs slut, wife finds out, wife yells in the town square, slut is stoned, man will carry the scars from the whipping until the end of his days). How many terrorist attacks in Afghanistan do you think have been inspired by a woman saying to her husband “I have a headache, and I will continue to have a headache until those Americans who invaded our house and insulted my dignity are dead?” How many famous female terrorists have Americans hunted and killed in Iraqistan, can you find any examples?
Mark these words, the battle cry of the Vikings of the 22nd century will be “Allah-u-AkBORKBORKBORK!”
You are mistaking the healthy silhouette of K selection rearing strategy for female ascendancy in Nordic people.
You gotta stop thinking with an r shaped mind and in THIS artificial time.
and the insult of a Norway that rather than cleaving to its’ monarch, elected Quisling and was overrun with collaborators…
Let’s not make the night darker than it was… Quisling was hardly elected by anything except a govt body that pretty much had no choice… and “overrun” with collaborators? The Norwegian underground was one of the most decorated resistances, foremost for their work near Telemark and slowing the Germans down sufficiently in their race for the atomic bomb.
Also, you seem to think that Nordic women… hell, any women… are making conscious decisions about things like “making men more warlike”. Spurious outhouse sociology, at best. The simple answer is that men who push themselves to the fore are going to take advantages, and woman get swept along.
On a level playing field, or at least one in which the powers that be and all organs of information didn’t actively hamstring them, white men always did and always will come to the fore eventually.
These are unnatural times that require nature once again to intervene and sweep away the chaff that’s currently choking off the wheat.
The Norwegian underground was one of the most decorated resistances, foremost for their work near Telemark and slowing the Germans down sufficiently in their race for the atomic bomb.
Of course, this was just to gainsay the “collaborator” taunt. They did not, obviously, have the advantage of foresight and prophecy in re future events in the West, else they might have directed their efforts otherwise.
Quisling was right.
In answer to your question, “Why?” I submit the following.
I’ve got two kids. One of these wasn’t planned in the SJW sense, but certainly wasn’t unwelcome. I was fucking a woman whose company I love who was eager to bear children for me: why wouldn’t I conceive children with her.
Eleven years later with some money in the bank, we more intentionally conceive our second child. Deep down, the motivation is the same: I love her company and she wants more children with me.
What’s more, I we’ll probably conceive one more: the first two are well worth the investment.
Meanwhile, in Norway, I suspect such opportunities are not so encouraging for the native Norwegian men.
Pity them.
@ tteclod – how old were you when you had your first kid? (if you don’t mind me asking).
I was fresh out of private university w/ $100,000+ college debt; there are parts of those financial facts that I’ve tried to block-out. At the time I was still Christian and hadn’t yet adopted a “plenty of fish in the sea” attitude, else I’d have let the girlfriend cum wife go and hunted another after 5 or so years. Don’t get me wrong: she’s great, but I’ve advised my daughter to marry somebody financially secure, and I’ll tell my son to get money in the bank before making any marital agreements.
Europeans are not any more adapted to having hordes of Africans in their midst than American Indians are to processed foods and alcohol. Utopian Universalism is adaptive when say, Norwegians neighbor Danes, essentially the same DNA stock with minor linguistic and cultural differences. The relative isolation in the Western End of Eurasia had Europeans akin to Island animals unable to cope with an influx of r-selected animals from continents.
Natural selection cannot anticipate future events, it only works by random mutation, most of which are harmful, those few that are advantageous get passed down by greater reproductive success.
Maybe, but natural selection will back it self out of a dead end either through neoteny, the boss secretary model, or a combo of both.
it’s hard to keep a good man down.
good man such as yourself?
Yes, some niece and utopian Scandinavians said – ‘those poor brown people – we should invite them here’ – never comprehending the scale of the third world – and pressure that’d built up behind the bulwarks. Now it’s too late – even if they closed the boarders – the deluge will continue …
//giphy.com/embed/kXK1JHgdGKiI0
“The relative isolation in the Western End of Eurasia had Europeans akin to Island animals unable to cope with an influx of r-selected animals from continents.”
These times are not normative or forever. This is the greatest decline in world history so far. Greeks, Romans, Carthaginians, Goths, Huns, and then there was the regular wars in Europe after the Age of Discovery matured. Women always go with the highest bidder (superlative authority). They will support white beta conquerors when that is the best bet for immediate gratification. Any isolation is just the Matrix that materialized in earnest with 2nd-wave feminism. When the global economy finally goes kaput, the impossible ‘awakening’ will be unavoidable instincts with flowery rationale. Women will be plain needy, and men of action will get sex galore. We have not yet begun to fight (for sovereignty), nor should we just yet. Now we are jostling for pole position, and we may as well have fun doing it. Whatever evolution does, evolution does. It is silly to think the future of the white race hangs in the balance of what any one of us does. “It’s all the same, only the names will change.” Evolution is self-regulating and invokes homoeostasis. Almost certainly the harder the fall of the West the bigger the comeback, and the longer the wait. We won’t see what happens. Might as well live for yourself and let genes fend for themselves. If they need you, they will use you. When the time comes in the next turning point, the genes we have are out there, shared in the gene pool. Some will be at the right place and the right time to do us proud. If not, our genes aren’t special. I think some of our genes our special, and I don’t fear nature’s judgment. Show me that outcome independence that makes a successful outcome inevitable.
> “minor linguistic and cultural differences” ——— Kinda like, oh, say, Ashkenazic Eskimos living next to Sephardic Eskimos in Alaska.
The sooner the power goes out the better. The sooner the white SJW’s are raped until death by the diversity they lovingly imported the better. The sooner their telephone calls to their state god of 911 go unanswered the better.
To you vibrant youths, la raza, and all versions of sexual perversion, pray and sacrifice to your sacred gods, the blue badge gang, for the second they do not respond to a “hate crime” is the second you go extinct.
The enemies of God are always delivered unto the righteous…
… often only after much chastening and burnishing of said righteous… and by a timetable known to no man, nor even the Son Himself…
… but they are delivered.
http://abcnews.go.com/US/19-year-spend-25-years-registered-sex-offender/story?id=32783206
^Girl lies about her age so that she can have sex with a 19-year-old guy. The guy is then arrested and put on the sex offender list for 25 years, despite both the “victim” and her mother testifying for him. He has to spend 90 days in jail and can’t use a computer or a cell phone for 5 years. Fuck this country
Sounds like they created another soldier for the opposite side.
They would stop doing that if they had to worry about finding their families eviscerated one day, coming home from a hard day of work crushing testicles.
Just like that movie you mentioned earlier… one of his targets was the judge.
That’s cuckservative morality for ya: a 17-year-old girl is a “child”, and only a pervert would want to bang her.
In a typical state of the USA, what is the Statute of Limitations on “technical” Statutory Rape? Not much more than seven years? Serious question. Thx.
I’m afraid its all too simple and familiar: Status whoring. Swedes are ironically very ethnocentric, when it comes to other whites. They look down on all other subsets of whites, be it english, german, italian, whatever. They’re totally not racist, but Swedes are the best. The cognitive dissonance is lost on them. By being the most “multicultural” and “tolerant” of the white race, they are status-whoring the same way cuck vegan new englanders assert their superiority over “redneck” dixiefolk.
The brown people are merely pawns in a scandinavian’s constant need to feel like he is better than other clans of whites. Its all fun and games until your grandkids end up raped or brown. But it hasn’t hit that close to home yet for the majority of scandis. It happens, but mostly to the lower SES whites, the majority of status whoring whites who drive the court of public opinion here and in Scandinavia are still bubbled from the effects of diversity. Occasionally a rasta will marry a Boehner’s daughter but not often enough to effect the mass of the status whores genetic destiny, higher class white women still prefer white men, and avoid dark alleys at night, so the daughters of the elite remain mostly unscathed, with cool kudos and feelgoods going to the tolerant fathers and mothers who support the Moor invasion that pillages their less fortunate white brothers and sisters.
And the answer is “Mouse Utopia”, the cumulative genetic decline of a population without purpose or Malthusian forces….
“Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this? I’m open to the possibility of covert biowarfare or an unknown natural parasite infecting and damaging the minds of northern european weak whytes.”
I know, you’re open to every (materialist) pseudo-explanation but the correct one.
In fact, the explanation is one that, unfortunately, materialists like yourself are unable to get: ideas, basic philosophic ideas. Because of the ideas that we are taught in our culture (school, universities, the media, books, movies), we Scandinavians believe that it’s morally wrong to put our interests above those of others, ie, to be “selfish”. “Everybody’s is equal in value”, we think. “Therefore we ought to help everybody in need, no matter their nationality or race, no matter the consequences to ourselves.”
Teach these ideas to people for a couple of generations and they are completely unable to fight for their interests. Whatever happens they feel virtuous promoting their own demise.
This guy explains it well: http://www.amazon.com/Defense-Selfishness-Self-Sacrifice-Unjust-Destructive/dp/1137280166/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1438472568&sr=1-1&keywords=peter+schwartz+selfishness
“Altruism upholds parasitism. It declares that if anyone desires something he lacks, he is morally entitled to make others supply him with it. Altruism declares that mooching is moral but independence and self-reliance are not, that living off others is respectable but providing for oneself is crudely venal.”
1. Form clandestine organisations.
2. Place sleeper agents in government and military, gain access to targets.
3. Initiate revolution.
4. Immediately silence/disable key members of government (and military loyal to government), starting from the top.
5. Establish new order.
6. Free revolutionaries.
Sweden and Norway look like perfect places to start.
After all, one Breivik won’t make a difference.
“On a more (less?) somber note, what the hell is wrong with Scandinavians? ”
Short answer: RELIGION.
Long answer:
There are two types of leftists; socialists and progressives.
Socialists: concerned with economic equality and wealth redistribution. See regular marxists. They are not the problem.
Progressives: concerned with racial and gender equality. See cultural marxists. They are the problem.
Whereas socialists follow an ideology, progressives abide by religion.
To simplify, progressives believe that their god, The Evil God Adolf Hitler, will arise and blot out the sun unless they persecute and sacrifice anyone whose ideas are even tangentially related to Hitler.
A religion is a system of ideas based on faith. Insofar as progressives believe in an event set in the FUTURE (the Evil God that will arise) they are religious BY DEFINITION.
Progressivism is therefore not an ideology that is similar to a religion but rather a religion that is similar to an ideology.
Common objections.
1. How can their god be Adolf Hitler? They hate him. Answer: Not all religions are like Christianity where the god is beneficient. In the extinct Aztec religions, for example, the gods were evil and had to be constantly appeased in order to be kept at bay.
2. But no progressive I know considers himself religious. Answer: The definition of religion is: A system of ideas based on faith. Period. Full stop. For a religion to be a religion it does not matter whether believers consider themselves religious or even that they be aware that they are religious.
3. But that’s not religion, it’s history. Answer: Stalin killed more people than Hitler. So why aren’t progressives also persecuting marxists? If it was a matter of history they would but since Stalin is not part of their religion they don’t care.
Side note: A minority of progressives are perfectly aware that they (progressives) are religious lunatics. However, in a secular system the advantage to be gained by denying your religious nature is ENOURMOUS. In practice secularism has become a device that keeps competing religions locked out in order to enable this covert religion to take over govt institutions one by one via systematic persecution of unbelievers.
And now.. back to the question.
What’s wrong with Scandinavians? Actually the better question is what’s wrong with Swedes since other Scandinavians, the Danish and Finns for example, are nowhere near as zonked out on religion as the Swedes. Sweden is the Vatican of progressivism. The country is for all practical purposes a progressive theocracy.
Fact 1: Sweden is number one in Europe for immigration.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Sweden
And logically therefore..
Fact 2: Sweden has become number two worldwide for rape and sexual violence per capita.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/top-5-countries-highest-rates-rape-1434355
And logically therefore..
Fact 3: Almost half (38%) of Swedish women now live in fear of leaving their homes.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/04/when-it-comes-to-rapes-islamized-sweden-is-already-in-a-state-of-war
And logically therefore..
Fact 4: The Swedish goverment is confronting the problem by criminalizing criticism of immigration and its consequences.
http://www.vdare.com/posts/swedish-judge-on-criticism-of-muslim-rape-wave-whether-or-not-a-pronouncement-is-true-has-no-bearing-on-the-case
Wait! What!?
Half the women live in terror and the logical solution is to criminalize those who complain? That makes no sense!!
And it cannot make sense in a progressives as ideology framework. Progressives are all for women rights etc. It just doesn’t compute.
But it makes perfect sense when you look at it from a religious perspective. The Swedish progressives are not sadists; they are truly and genuinely saddened by the fact that half their women live in terror. But their religious beliefs compel them to inflict a REAL horror in order to prevent an IMAGINARY horror that to them, and only to them, is real and vastly greater.
Seen from the outside this is flat out insane. Seen from the inside, from the progressive perspective, it is what good people just have to do, even if it’s ugly, because it’s the lesser evil.
The most disturbing aspect of all this is that a large number of these terrorized Swedish women, possibly the majority, are themselves progressives and are therefore WILLING participants in this mass human sacrifice.
Interestingly, when Cortez described the mass human sacrifices he attended (with a line of sacrifees four abreast and two miles long) he noted that the sacrifees were very cooperative and regarded being sacrificed as a great honor. The parallels between the Aztec religions and progressivism are chilling.
To conclude, why are the Swedes so self destructive? Because the progressive religion has shattered their minds. And since this religion is persecutionist in nature, it has mostly eradicated the unbelievers and thereby hermetically sealed off its adherents from the reach of sanity.
Finally, before closing, this meme (original version: political correctness is a religion) was developed by Bob Whittaker, the memetic warfare specialist who devised the “Evil Empire” meme back when he was a Reagan speechwriter. However since he is of failing health and is devoting all his time to the mantra (also his) this meme seems to have gone orphan instead of viral.
Following the roaring success of the cuckservative meme, I’ve been frantically searching for the source. (I was like What!? Other memetic warriors!? Where, where, where!?) That’s how I found this blog. I am slack jaw ASTONISHED at the master wordsmithing going on around here. I am hoping some of you may take interest in the Progressives As Religious Whackjobs meme and help forge another shiv; this time to counter our frontal enemies.
For example, I still can’t figure out what the labels should be. Religious Freakazoid? Whackjob? Lunatic? A single word would be best. Does it exist? Can it be created by combination like cuckold + conservative? And that’s just one aspect that needs work. It’s really frustrating to have the virus sitting in the lab and yet to lack the wordsmithing skills necessary to weaponize it.
Anyway, I’ll leave you with an example meme deployment to anchor it all in:
Progressive: Bla bla lessons of history bla bla holocaust bla bla ignorance bla bla.
You: Oh god here comes another wild eyed religious freakazoid. Yeah right X’s freedom of speech must be sacrificed because otherwise woooooo woooooo the Evil God Adolf Hitler will arise and wooooo wooo blot out the sun or some other whacked out religious shit. Get a fucking grip you cretin. I don’t see progressive fundamentalists persecuting marxists even though Stalin killed more than Hitler. Why not? Are you weirdos too zonked out on religion to even pretend to be rational?
Regards,
WitchHunterSix
what the hell is wrong with Scandinavians? Was the fight culled out of them so thoroughly by the loss of their sterner viking brothers to adventures afar that today they LITERALLY welcome their civilization’s cucking on a mass scale?
As is so often the case, race and gender are inextricably linked:
Scandinavia’s role in Nazi Germany just came to light around the turn of the century. Libtards then used Scandinavian nations’ latent guilt to effect change: enter stage left (ha!) feminism; gendered pronouns transmogrified into soft, gender-neutral pronouns; the political and academic landscape quickly changed; The Media followed (or led), not long after.
From there, it was a perfectly reasonable and necessary step to let cartoonist-killers into their cuntries.
THE JUDAISTS ARE BEHIND THE ALIEN INVASION–EXTERMINATION OF WHITES IS THEIR PLAN.
Thanks for the interesting article. The Judaists are behind the alien invasion in Europe. The woman in the video might be Jewish herself or appointed by Judaists to brainwash the gullible public that the alien invasion is good.
You can see Jewish woman Barbara Lerner Spectre advocating genocide and destruction of European whites, specially Swedes, by inciting the alien invasion, here:
http://www.henrymakow.com/a_letter_from_sweden.html
The Judaists hate whites, especially white Christians and want to destroy them because they believe whites tried to exterminate them (Holocaust, Crusades, etc.). Their Talmud also teaches them that Jesus is in hell in boiling excrement (see Talmud Unmasked Online).
Unable to do that militarily, they are using the divide and conquer strategy instead by promoting multiculturalism, malcegenation and immigration to bring in 3rd world aliens who will attack whites, especially white women, and destroy white society to extract revenge and so that they can “feel safe” in a multicultural society.
Wilson you are spot on correct, that is precisely what’s happening.
One young ass-hat I met from Stockholm working here in America offered “Sweden is becoming more cosmopolitan!” Sorry, Mohammed doesn’t make Manhattan.
Why did you ban me? Did I hurt your feelings?
Unban FTW!
what color are you?
Oh, not everyone is “excited” about the way NE is headed.
http://yle.fi/uutiset/national_socialist_group_riots_in_jyvaskyla__dozens_arrested/8197496
By the way, have you guys seen the videos of all the “migrants” trying to enter the uk?
I see swarms of black bodies, with no skills or qualifications and probably criminal histories, trying to pollute UK society. Disgusted. Some things can’t be ignored.
piigs!
SWPL feel-good experiment goes haywire in vibrant US area.
Frontrunner media blames “humanity”.
Less is wrong with Scandis than with yanks – there is large, organized opposition to mass immigration in all scandi countries and some (Denmark in particular) have turned the tide with tight immigration rules and the “far right” being the largest government party.
Sweden is improving rapidly, with the pretty hardcore Sweden Democrats growing rapidly. (Google their 2010 election commercial for flavor – you’ll never see something like that in a US election)
Lots of growing opposition here to immigration in the United States of America too; getting real sick of this shit quick.
There are different types of game but most of what I see here is PUA game. The kind that gets you the lay. The kind I tend to focus on is relationship game which can be marriage or LTR. In other words it is about owning. CH had a good article on this when it made the brilliant observation of Ric Ocasek’s wife, Paulina and how he claimed ownership of her. At the core was an emotional push/pull connection.
James Harmon showed tremendous push/pull and mastered the emotional connection in his Alpha submission.
I recently watched Dr Zhivago. One of the most Alpha scenes I have ever witnessed was when he read his wife’s letter which was given to him by his beautiful mistress. In the letter Zhivago’s wife says that his mistress is a good person. She basically supported him in his choice of a mistress. Truly classic.
Gynaecologist: Well Miss Smith I can honestly say you have the most beautiful vagina I have ever seen.
Miss Smith: Thankyou Doctor.
Gynaecologist: Do you one if I numb you a bit before I begin the examination?
Miss Smith: Not at all.
Gynaecologist: num num num num num
Gynaecologist: Do you one mind if I numb you a bit before I begin the examination?
Patient. Not at all.
Gynaecologist: num num num num num
Have Scandinavians Lost Their Minds?
Yes. Next question please.
Maybe ease up a bit. Fascism only works in a racially homogenous society with a simple economy. It never has nor will work in a racially mixed countries with complex economies. The Deomoncrats have been finding this out the hard way for years.
This isn’t the first time CH ponders about the scandinavian, or Swedish, madness. I have also thought about why my nation behaves this way many a times, and I beleive I have narrowed it down to a few critical points. This post became very long, but I was gonna write it somewhere sometime anyhow.
Anyhow, the reason why we are like this requires historical background and modern analysis.
1. Peace.
War and hard times breeds harder people. This is known. Some here falsely argues that christianity is the reason of the meekness of the west, which is a dumb idea, probably stemming from that hitlequote that if germanics were islamic they would rule the world yada-yada. If anything, europe was never more aggressive than during the heigt of christianity. In the 1600’s alone, there were solely 2 years of absolute peace in Europe. Christianity didn’t end the vikings. Swedes kept crossing the sea to wage war for centuries. Swedish aggressiveness shaped the northern geography of Europe, the warrior-druids of the asatro simply switched to christianity and became warrior-priests (Yes, we had warrior priests). Sweden was ruled by Warrior-kings who unlike most western kings actually fought with their men on the battlefield, like Gustaf Adolf the second who waged the thirty year war (that reduced germanys population by ~30%). Or Karl the 12th, who in the Great northern war alone Sweden fought Denmark, Poland and Russia singlehandedly, and defeated the first two but ended up losing to the Russian winter, a prequel to Napoleon and Nazi germany. Christianity didn’t end the Vikings, Vikings just switched appearance.
However, since 1809 Sweden has been at peace. While, Denmark, Norway and Finland were invaded in the wars of the 20th century Sweden managed to stay neutral by skillfull diplomacy and a humble treaties. Sweden exported its iron ore resources to Nazi germany and let Germany transport troops on its railways. It must be asserted that before WW2 Sweden had closer cultural ties with germany than the anglosaxon west, it was more common to speak german as a second language than english.
This neutrality and cooperation with nazi germany would be used as a tool in the post-war era by the radical left to shame the right and move towards political correctness. In the 1960’s, Sweden was the fourth richest country in the world in total grodd domestic product, NOT COUNTING PER CAPITA, while being one of the smallest population wise. While the rest of Europe was ruined by the war Sweden had profited and was now enduring a golden age, we prevailed in sports (Sweden still has most gold medals per capita in the world), music (Abba, etc), and industry. We had all this money but we gained it trough supporting nazi germany.
The effect is clearly apparent, Out of all the scandinavian nations, Sweden is by far the most politically correct. Sweden takes far more immigration than the other countires per capita, if u think Norway is bad, Swedish journalists portray Norway as backwards racists who won’t embrace multiculture.
Sweden has been at peace of 200 years, and it has rendered us spoiled, ignorant and meek. While the other countries aren’t as bad, compared to a country like poland that lost 30% of its population in WW2 they were relatively untouched by the war. How large islamic immigration do you think Poland have?
2. Long, dark winters
Scandinavia has long harsh winters, a clear environmental difference compared to the rest of Europe. Harsh winters, in opposite to peace, creates hard people (and beautiful) people, though the effect is gone in modern times. Yet it also breeds a empathic, communal, cooperative culture. If the farmer next door has a bad season and is unprepared for the winter, what do you do? You give him some of your proviants, so that he can support you in the future if your harvest would fail, family or not. Harsh winters forced people to cooperate to endure. Take this is indifference to China, which lacks philantropy outside the family. There is always rice somewhere and there are so many people that helping someone and expecting return is asking for parasitism, families who fail to supply themselves cannot blame or expect support from anyone else. Sweden have a history of a very communal, cooperative history.
In fact, the same mechanism is why blonde hair stems from Scandinavia. If you have a harsh winter and food only enough for one of your women to make it trough, you save the one with the golden hair becuase her value is greater. If you have food only for one of your kids and you are blonde, you save the blonde kid becuase there is a greater chance it is your offspring (men can never be 100% sure).
This communal culture has created a strong bond among the Swedes. Gustaf Adolfphus could switch to protestantism relatively easily, as soon as it was established among the king and priests, people followed suit. It is the reason why Sweden was so succesfull at war, Swedish kings could drain more men and drain the economy of the nation more than other nations, creating armies that could count for 5-10% of the total population. When Sweden lost at Poltava, approximately 100,000 people were lost in a country that only included about 2 million people, including Finland.
The long dark winters has worked as a mechanism both for strong evolutionary development and altruistic, communal culture. Swedes follow suit. When political correctness and progressivness hijacked social democracy and became the established ideology, Swedes followed suit.
3. Social democracy and the political class
The two reasons described have another consequence that is worthy of its own point. The communal, altruistic culture combined with long periods of peace made scandinavia a fertile environment for social democracy. In its early days, Social democracy was merely class warfare of the workers done democratically, and they won. Before the war, social democratic politicians were mostly a mix of workers from all over the country, each representing the workers movements at their hometowns. Nation, patriotism, homogenity was praised among these men. As Tage Erlander stated in 1965 in response to the American race riots: “We Swedes live in such a eternally more lucky situation. Our countries people is homogeneus, not only in terms of race but also in many other aspects”
However, the post-WW2 birth of political correctness would create a new generation of politicians, the so called 68-generation. 68 was the peak of socialism, and those students inevitably replaced the old. They did not get their seats becuase they were the most competent, increasingly the power fell to the ones that were best at embracing the already dominant culture, in this case, progressiveness or political correctness. Women were brought in not becuase of their competence, but becuase they were women who claimed to represent other women. The introduction of the TV and mass media gave power to rhetorics and appearance rather than competence and results. Inevitably, the 68 generation would inevitable replace the old, and with it came the cancer.
Most tops in the party these days are there becuase they joined the youth organization at a very young age, started making connections at an early age, or had parents with the connections for them. All they had to do next was embrace the already dominant ideology and they were set. People who chose opposition on the wrong questions were doomed to not have a successfull political career. Me being a student at a world top 100 university, I have friends of friends who are now entering parliament becuase of their parents making them join politics at an early age combined with pure nepotism. These people live far from the ghettos in the most white neighbourhoods, yet embrace mass immigration more than anyone else. The argument is simple, there is war and horror in the world while we live in peace and prosperity, how can we deny refugees?
In the 80’s Sweden received about 30 war refugees from vietnam for integration, that was a big happening at the time. In the 90’s the balkan war started, and suddenly immigration were in the number of thousands. In 2014, we broke the record yet again with 116 00 immigrants, officially. Bear in mind, Sweden only has 10 million people, so a decade of this level of immigration is 10% of our population.
Just like in the US but more so, there is a political class in Scandinavia that has embraced political correctness and “progressiveness” strongly becuase of historical shame and cultural affinity for it. The right has never been as strong, since Scandinavia doesn’t have the same tradition of classical liberalism, and had were smaller countries with a more entrenched scene of democratic class warfare.
Future.
Id like to write this to give some hope. Last month, the Swedish democrats, which youth organization made a very un-apologizing video that CH actually linked last year (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VR-lAGj_dlQ), became the countries second biggest party in the polls. The current social democratic governments support is plummeling rapidly. 10 years ago they could claim 45% of the voter base, last month they scored 22%. In fact, the nationalist party is already the greatest party among members of the workers union, the LO. Even though every paper and media institutution, including the states insitutution, is unofficially or officially against the nationalist movement, it just keeps growing. Confidence for the journalist and politician proffession have never been lower in the polls.
The swedish people is waking up, and as some people said previously, we swedes are somewhat an all or nothing nation. We have a history and affinity for embracing the dominant ideology and stay togheter. We embraced political correctness more than anyone else.
We can do the opposite, too.
The citizens in these countries have been betrayed by traitorous elites. Unless you consider cowardice and credulousness mental disorders, they have not “lost their minds”.
All it takes is 10% of the population to stand up and fight back. Once that critical mass is reached, traitors will swing.
Please let me live to see it….
Its misleading to single out Scandinavia.
There are Greeks, Italians, Spaniards, Irishmen, Englishmen, Germans and White Americans who would say the exact same thing, for the exact same reason:
They believe, or pretend to believe, the PC Religion preached by Hollywood-academia-msm-etc., enforced via social shaming and economic consequences by the ADL etc., and enacted into policy by politicians funded by Soros-Adelson-Singer etc.
PC (aka new-left) is essentially leftism hijacked to serve Jewish ethnic interests, and it is the default culture of the entire modern West, of which Scandinavia is a fairly typical part.
A more illuminating questions might be, why do some regions of the West buck the trend and resist PC?
1. Eastern Europe – People brutalized by the old-left resist being bamboozled by the new-left.
2. Christian areas – people can’t give themselves wholeheartedly to the new religion if they still believe the old religion. In particular, the old faith persists in the frontier zone of Protestant Christianity (The American South and Great Plains, Ulster, South Africa, Switzerland, Hungary) and in the Counter-Reformation belt of Catholic Christianity (Flanders, France, Austria, Hungary – areas which once seemed on the verge of becoming majority Protestant but were reclaimed for the Catholic Church in the 17th century).
3. France – As the birthplace of leftism, France also has the oldest tradition of intellectually serious *resistance* to leftism. Peripheral regions serve as strongholds for a rich variety of anti-PC resistance movements – MPF in Vendee, Bloc Identitaire in Provence, and National Front in Alsace.
How the fuck is that exciting?
One takes a gander at something like the “Groningen Protocol” and one realizes Islam is a blessing for post-Christian Europe.
Let’s get #ZacharyHammond trending. Maybe this will help put a damper on the whole “police target black men” narrative.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/zachary-hammond-shot-police-south-carolina_55ba6d51e4b0af35367aaa16
All animals come with an enemy identification module. Christianity disables this in white men.
Scripture is very explicit about enemies.
Just a small sampling:
Proverbs 6:16-20
2 Timothy 3: 1-5
I’ve told you antiXtian clowns this before… learn the subject matter you would discuss, or just STFU.
A third alternative is to come get one in the yarbles… if’n ya got any yarbles, eunuch jelly, thou.
Also, Sweden happens to be one of the least Christian countries in all of Europe… which takes some doing, I’ll add.
It seems that way from the outset, until you remember that through Christianity nations were conquered through force, which takes balls. So then the problem would seem how Christianity is defined. I know you think you’re making sense, and you are from a modern perspective of what Christianity has become, but try and remember that religion is politics, and the definition and meaning of words are weapons of politics.
This is what happens when men start sitting down to pee.
Safety from danger and freedom from need (or at least being told that you will always be safe and secure) is pure, distilled nectar for the growth of an “r” oriented hind-brain.
For at least 3 generations the Scandis, for the most part, have believed they had an abundance of both.
Sweden has never worried much about being invaded, even by the Nazis, for, like 150 years. Norway was invaded by the Nazis but the effect of it was mainly to beta-ize them as they were forced to watch their wome-folk eagerly get in long lines for the German occupying soldiers and then for their Canadian replacements.
Finland is the sanest because they were never part of Nato and have few natural resources. And there was that little war they fought -alone – with the USSR.
Regardless; welfare for strong and independent mothers has been comprehensive in each of them for a long time.
A small boat with some random Scandis on board, It sinks in a storm, but they all were able to swim to a nice island.
6 Months go by and they are rescued.
The Norwegians had gotten together and caught a lot of fish,
The Finns had gotten together and cut down all of the trees.
The Swedes, having never been formally introduced, had done nothing but keep to themselves.
“For at least 3 generations the Scandis, for the most part, have believed they had an abundance of both.”
Nothing is mentioned here of WWII victors, their propaganda machine, and opportunistic parasites.
Norway was invaded by the Nazis but the effect of it was mainly to beta-ize them as they were forced to watch their wome-folk eagerly get in long lines for the German occupying soldiers and then for their Canadian replacements.
Bullshit cuck fetishism, as per Rum’s usual nonsense. A few illegitimate births, a handful of marriages, out of a population of millions, well… DUH!
No, the womenfolk did not “eagerly got in long lines”… but congratulations on not mentioning the Germans were mostly from the Schwarzwald and the Canadians were negroes.
(((shakin’ mah haid))
A Swede speaks: “Norwegians… they are like our Irish, no?”
I heard these comments first hand while in Flottsbro (2008) – there to defend our great country’s honor in a world championship motorsport event.
The cliche I heard was that Danes are the laid-back stoners, Norwegians are the rednecks, and Swedes are the puritans of the Scandi race.
I’d say that’s pretty accurate. 🙂
The crumbling propaganda machine phones it in with this headline: “Why some Americans refuse to give up the Confederate flag.”
Ottoman empire’s scribe sez wut?
PA
I type really slowly because my hands are missing a number of fingers, (Acquired … …or eat shit and die)
What all this means is that most of my screeds here or in any pit-fight comment zone will have been painfully entered with the few intact digits that I possess that are still usefull for this kind of work..
My comments will often take awhile to make, and always will want to be short. So… I can promise you that my comments here will leave a lot unanswered.
Yeah well, I’m typing on a new smartphone. My most thoughtful and informative comments have required a phone I’m accustomed to or an old fashioned keyboard.
“Darwin said survival was genetic directive #1. How would he explain this?”
Because as long as the immigrant hordes don’t move next door, your immediate survival isn’t threatened. You can signal high status to your eskimo-influenced peers who believe multiculturalism is a sign of class and intelligence, without ever seeing a brown person. Sure, they can move in somewhere, filed in closely in the ghettos a safe distance away from your coffee and lingonberry jam. It’s all fun and status points until your grandkids end up brown.
Check out Clinton’s new tv ad. Claims her mother Dorothy was “abandoned” as child (note: supposedly her parents peaced out, but dorth was still cared for by her grandparents; I would be interested to know true extent of abanonment (Clinton is low enough to destroy reputation of potentially loving, hardpressed grandparents for political gain)). She then compares ole Mom’s struggle to that of all those hardscabble gals out there in nowtimes on the rightsideofhistory. All the while, Hil’s face consistently gives off the vibe as if she’s on gobs of pain pills. Camera cuts to a woman. White. Fat. Youngish. She appears to be mom to a fat half black child. New cut. Older white mom. Child may be half Puerto Rican. Both mom’s are protecting their children and Hillary wants you to know she is protecting them all. Jezebel is reverent. As pathetic as this whole cheap ploy is, I can’t help but think this is the sort of pathetic thing pushes us toward inevitable bloodletting, which is probably a good thing overall.
I liked the Wachtmeister comment. So Sweden got hit with a wave of refugees during the Balkan Wars, eh? I used to work with a Bosnian Muslim piece of shit who loved to tell a story about how one of her Bosnian Muslim piece of shit friends who ended up in Sweden was “forced” to change her last name to something that sounded Swedish when she wanted to enroll in college there. This proved that the Swedes are the “most racist people on the planet” in the mind of our mongrel Ottoman leftover. It just goes to show you can never please untermenschen; bringing huge numbers of them in and taking care of them isn’t enough; you have to comply with every demand and bend your culture to theirs too.
Get a load of this fucking faggot.
Refraining from forcefully changing somebody’s name isn’t equivalent to “bending your culture to appease them”. In fact, forcing people to change their names is EXACTLY what your Ottoman betters used to do.
What. Is “forcefully” changing someone’s name good or bad? If my “Ottoman betters” did it shouldn’t it be good? Why are you so upset then? P.S. the story the Bosnian turd told was bullshit which is why I put “force” in quotes. Swedes are the LEAST racist people on the planet.
If you feel like continuing to rant and rave, I’d like to hear what makes the Ottomans better than my Northern European ancestors. Should be funny.
It’s obvious: changing somebody’s name is obviously a dick move. The Jap did it to the Koreans. Turks did it to their subjects as well. To pretend that this isn’t a bad thing is a little silly.
If it is fabricated, well, that is a different story.
What did the Ottomans do better? Well, I don’t think too many Yuropeans shat themselves with the same force when they heard the Swedes were coming, heh heh.
Seriously though, 17th century Swedes were NASTY as hell. What they did to their victims was actually disgusting…
Actually, don’t bother. It’s bedtime, I don’t really care what you have to say, and I’ll care even less tomorrow.
Okay you came in at the buzzer, I’ll talk. Give me a minute.
If you live in someone’s country, if they’ve taken you in as a refugee, and you want to apply to one of their institutions of higher learning, and they’d prefer you drop or change a suffix in your name because it’s easier to pronounce and/or they want you to assimilate, then don’t complain. I find it quite unbelievable that the Swedes would force or compel an immigrant to change their name to go to school (and the person saying this was a lying whore sack of shit), but who knows. I read in Gregory Clark’s book “The Son Also Rises” that even having a surname ending in “-son” in Swedish society is considered low class and those people are expected to change their names if they want to be taken seriously. If I moved to Russia and they would prefer that I changed my name to Mafey or Matyu, because they don’t have the “th” sound, I wouldn’t say that Russians were bigoted.
Let’s be friends. I didn’t know we had an Ottoman Empire partisan on these boards, and I’ll be more considerate in the future. No hard feelings Cheerio etc.
“with a Bosnian Muslim piece of shit”
On the other hand, let me take a wild guess, Ibrahimovic is your national hero?
I had to look him up. I’m not from Sweden, although I do have some Swedish ancestry. For the record, Bosnian Christians are probably okay– I just happen to know from experience that Bosniaks, no matter how White they might appear, do not identify as White and in fact they positively hate Whites. I tend not to like them in return. Sorry for any pain that was caused to your feels.
“At the time I was still Christian and hadn’t yet adopted a “plenty of fish in the sea”.
The scarcity mentality versus the surplus mentality, is something every single man needs to be informed about and fully conscious of.
“This communal culture has created a strong bond among the Swedes. Gustaf Adolfphus could switch to protestantism relatively easily, as soon as it was established among the king and priests, people followed suit. It is the reason why Sweden was so succesfull at war, Swedish kings could drain more men and drain the economy of the nation more than other nations, creating armies that could count for 5-10% of the total population. ”
Btw, that’s one of the reasons why the Ottomans did so well in war.
Welcome to Sweden
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3KSJY0c8QWw
“On a more (less?) somber note, what the hell is wrong with Scandinavians? ”
Short answer: RELIGION.
Long answer:
There are two types of leftists; socialists and progressives.
Socialists: concerned with economic equality and wealth redistribution. See regular marxists. They are not the problem.
Progressives: concerned with racial and gender equality. See cultural marxists. They are the problem.
Whereas socialists follow an ideology, progressives abide by religion.
To simplify, progressives believe that their god, The Evil God Adolf Hitler, will arise and blot out the sun unless they persecute and sacrifice anyone whose ideas are even tangentially related to Hitler.
A religion is a system of ideas based on faith. Insofar as progressives believe in an event set in the FUTURE (the Evil God that will arise) they are religious BY DEFINITION.
Progressivism is therefore not an ideology that is similar to a religion but rather a religion that is similar to an ideology.
Common objections.
1. How can their god be Adolf Hitler? They hate him. Answer: Not all religions are like Christianity where the god is beneficient. In the extinct Aztec religions, for example, the gods were evil and had to be constantly appeased in order to be kept at bay.
2. But no progressive I know considers himself religious. Answer: The definition of religion is: A system of ideas based on faith. Period. Full stop. For a religion to be a religion it does not matter whether believers consider themselves religious or even that they be aware that they are religious.
3. But that’s not religion, it’s history. Answer: Stalin killed more people than Hitler. So why aren’t progressives also persecuting marxists? If it was a matter of history they would but since Stalin is not part of their religion they don’t care.
Side note: A minority of progressives are perfectly aware that they (progressives) are religious lunatics. However, in a secular system the advantage to be gained by denying your religious nature is ENOURMOUS. In practice secularism has become a device that keeps competing religions locked out in order to enable this covert religion to take over govt institutions one by one via systematic persecution of unbelievers.
And now.. back to the question.
What’s wrong with Scandinavians? Actually the better question is what’s wrong with Swedes since other Scandinavians, the Danish and Finns for example, are nowhere near as zonked out on religion as the Swedes. Sweden is the Vatican of progressivism. The country is for all practical purposes a progressive theocracy.
Fact 1: Sweden is number one in Europe for immigration.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_to_Sweden
And logically therefore..
Fact 2: Sweden is number two worldwide for rape and sexual violence per capita.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/top-5-countries-highest-rates-rape-1434355
And logically therefore..
Fact 3: Almost half (38%) of Swedish women now live in fear of leaving their homes.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/04/when-it-comes-to-rapes-islamized-sweden-is-already-in-a-state-of-war
And logically therefore..
Fact 4: The Swedish goverment is confronting the problem by criminalizing criticism of immigration and its consequences.
http://www.vdare.com/posts/swedish-judge-on-criticism-of-muslim-rape-wave-whether-or-not-a-pronouncement-is-true-has-no-bearing-on-the-case
Wait! What!?
Half the women live in terror and the logical solution is to criminalize those who complain? That makes no sense!!
And it cannot make sense in a progressives as ideology framework. Progressives are fanatical about women rights. You’d expect a progressive who hears about such a horror to freak the fuck out and to scream their outrage until their facial veins burst. And yet.. there they are busy collaborating in it all; ensuring nobody hears about it so that nothing is done. They might as well pin the women onto the rape racks themselves. It’s a total contradiction and it just doesn’t compute.
But it makes perfect sense when you look at it from a religious perspective. The Swedish progressives are not sadists; they are truly and genuinely saddened by the fact that half their women live in terror. But their religious beliefs compel them to inflict a REAL horror in order to prevent an IMAGINARY horror that to them, and only to them, is real and vastly greater.
Seen from the outside this is flat out insane. Seen from the inside, from the progressive perspective, it is what good people just have to do, even if it’s ugly, because it’s the lesser evil.
The most disturbing aspect of all this is that a large number of these terrorized Swedish women, possibly the majority, are themselves progressives and are therefore WILLING participants in this mass human sacrifice.
Interestingly, when Cortez described the mass human sacrifices he attended (with a line of sacrifees four abreast and two miles long) he noted that the sacrifees were very cooperative and regarded being sacrificed as a great honor. The parallels between the Aztec religions and progressivism are chilling.
To conclude, why are the Swedes so self destructive? Because the progressive religion has shattered their minds. And since this religion is persecutionist in nature, it has mostly eradicated the unbelievers and thereby hermetically sealed off its adherents from the reach of sanity.
Finally, before closing, this meme (original version: political correctness is a religion) was developed by Bob Whittaker, the memetic warfare specialist who devised the “Evil Empire” meme back when he was a Reagan speechwriter. However since he is of failing health and is devoting all his time to the mantra (also his) this meme seems to have gone orphan instead of viral.
Following the roaring success of the cuckservative meme, I’ve been frantically searching for the source. (I was like What!? Other memetic warriors!? Where, where, where!?) That’s how I found this blog. I am totally impressed by master wordsmithing going on around here, particularly the blogger. I am hoping some of you may take interest in the Progressives As Religious Crazies meme and help forge another shiv; this time to counter the frontal enemies.
For example, I still can’t figure out what the labels should be. Religious Freakazoid? Whackjob? Lunatic? A single word would be best. Does it exist? Can it be created by combination like cuckold + conservative? All I know is that the SJW label is shit; the religious freakazoids actually consider it a compliment. How stupid is that? And the labelling issues are just one aspect of this memetic embryo that needs work. It’s really frustrating to have the virus sitting in the lab and yet lack the wordsmithing skills necessary to weaponize it.
Anyway, I’ll leave you with an example meme deployment to anchor it all in:
Progressive: Bla bla lessons of history bla bla holocaust bla bla ignorance bla bla.
You: Oh god here comes another wild eyed religious freakazoid. Yeah right X’s freedom of speech must be sacrificed because otherwise woooooo woooooo the Evil God Adolf Hitler will arise and wooooo wooo blot out the sun or some other whacked out religious shit. Get a fucking grip you cretin. I don’t see progressive fundamentalists persecuting marxists even though Stalin killed more than Hitler. Why not? Are you weirdos too zonked out on religion to even pretend to be rational?
“Half the women live in terror”
38% isn’t half you fucking idiot.
Right, good point. Nothing to see here then. Let’s move on.
WH6,
Don’t mind ho, he’s one of our resident Eskimos, fronting for the powers-that-be, as his kin is wont to do.
Ho, don’t fall into the negro trap of diminishing the behavior of your kind.
Regardless of the math, that percentage is still way beyond any acceptable level, and it’s because of your racial and/or religious kin.
Christianity= Communism, Liberalism and Cultural Marxism. The so called “atheist liberal” is still a Christian in his or her mindset even though they don’t consciously realize it. They are still under the slave morality and universalist egalitarianism of the Christian religion that makes them believe non white races are their extended family (brothers and sisters) and that non whites are equal to whites and that we should play the zero sum game of decreasing in stature/prominence/wealth as whites so the non white scum can increase in all of these areas artificially (not by their acheivement) and the Jews get us to go along with this scam via the promotion over white guilt which they manufactured from their lies surrounding the holohoax and black African slavery (actually carried out by Jewish ship owners and slave merchants not white europeans). Corvinus and Greg Elliot might tell you that Swedes or so and so isn’t a very Christian country but thats their being deceptive as typical of Christians. The universalist egalitarian slave morality of Christianity continues on via the modern day liberalism these formerly all white countries today practice.
In the beginning, Christ Rode on an ass,
Now, an ass rides on Christ.
I thought I told you to STFU on subjects you know nothing about, Christianity foremost.
You fairy.
No, Christianity isn’t the problem, liberals are.
Thanks a lot for the featured comment Heartiste, that really made my day. As for solutions, I’d try to isolate the hetero-haters and feminists from the productive male-female parts of society. Clearly a feminist leaning government that takes most of people’s production and delivers it back in a feminist/gender bender biased fashion is the main problem in Scandinavia. Ever heard of feminists, lesbians and non-binaries running and starting successful companies? Doesn’t happen too often. They contribute a lot less to the state than they take out in addition to being bad influences, so cut off their supply to male ingenuity and manpower, and it’s change or die. Or at best live in separate communities – if they manage to scrape by on their own, good for them. I just don’t want them poisoning my well and drinking my wine. We can laugh at them when they try to build and run stuff too. Gay men tend to do well in a lot of important fields though (finance, design, creative occupations, Internet, startups), so they should be considered as a possible alliance, on our terms. Especially since they would really add a lot of power to a unified rainbow alliance – so some value is added if they join us, but a lot more production power is taken away from a competing rainbow alliance if they mainly decide to join us instead of them. Gays hate lesbians too, and they’re mostly very different from feminists. Also it would make the alliance more inclusive, to combat perceived and real bigotry, and they match well with feminine girls as no sexual interest male friends. (no homo)
We can’t deny it any longer, there is a direct link behind all this and some faction of Israeli supporters who, while making it ILLEGAL for their own race to intermarry they enforce intermarriages between all other races and obviously have a deep rooted hatred toward people of European ancestry.
And the national debt as a percentage of GDP for both countries is astronomical. Both are on the top 10 highest national debt list. Much higher than the US. That is the price they pay for diversity and social engineering.
Norway and Sweden that is………..
Reblogged this on Philosophies of a Disenchanted Scholar and commented:
The term you are looking for is allocentric.
The Nordic countries are allocentric.
This was a good thing around the Ice Age when cooperation was needed, and before mass transportation allowed people to cross multiple countries without issue. Now it’s pathological altruism, because your neighbour isn’t genetic kin, he is an invader kept in check by welfare provided from your (slave) labour.
[…] Heartiste detailed a Norwegian Cuck’s delight at the fact Mohammed is now the most popular nam… […]
[…] Heartiste detailed a Norwegian Cuck’s delight at the fact Mohammed is now the most popular nam… […]