Friend, you ask, “What do women want?” You are confused, and this hobbles your field effectiveness.
Listen closely.
Chick logic is unfathomable when you are in your teens, but now as a man in your twenties you have no excuse!
Challenge.
Chicks dig a challenge. Like men dig a bikini bridge.
It’s a mark of personal growth to occasionally reexamine your beliefs to affirm their validity. Why do chicks dig a challenge? Sociobiology gives us our answer.
Girls want men with power because such men have their pickings in women. These alpha males can have sex with many women and thus have opportunities to have many more children. Consequently, any sons they conceive will be blessed with their fathers’ genetic gifts, and these sons will grow up and, like their charming mofo dads, also have their pickings in girls.
The sexually successful son, in a state of nature, is the reproductively successful son, and his children will spread his mother’s genes as well. The more procreatively prolific the son, the more widely his mother’s genes are distributed across the next generation. Her genes are spread much more widely than if, in her youth, she had instead bedded down with a herbalicious partner who gave her herbalicious sons who played video games while the alphas were banging babes in the school stairwells.
Here’s where the challenge part comes in. A man with power (and this can take many forms. e.g.: money, fame, status, charm, humor, musical talent, looks, physique, jerkboy charisma) knows he has options and never feels desperate to “lock in” any one woman. He calmly moves from babe to babe. It is his assured, unperturbed demeanor which acts as a sexiness signal to girls, and unsurprisingly girls quickly recognize this signal. Their subconscious lizard brain tells them “Hmm, this man is unusually composed around beautiful women. Look at how they try to impress him! He must enjoy the intimate pleasure of their company regularly.” Their conscious brain is saying “OMG, he’s sexy! I want to mount his meat pony!”
Returning to your confusion, the lesson is this: by throwing yourself at girls and bending over backwards to do things for them, you are unconsciously sending the signal that you don’t get many romantic chances with them and you must try-extra-hard to impress the ones you do manage to get because you are afraid to lose them. You are the opposite of a challenge: you are a concession.
Now we come face to face with paradoxical chick logic.
Why, you may ask, do the movies show women catered to by chivalrous men while the female audience laps it up?
Why do women earnestly profess to like it when men open doors for them?
Why? why? why?, when I just got through telling you these actions will get you tossed in the buddy bin?
It’s easy to see how so many men get confused by the mixed signals between the cultural messages and their own dating reality.
Here, my friend, your answer is found. The clouds part! The fog lifts!
It is in a woman’s genetic interest to confuse men.
Unbeknownst to themselves, the inherent contradiction between women’s primal feelings and their publicly declared desires is actually a SCREEN to separate the wheat from the chafe. Think about it. If it were easy for men to spoof alpha male characteristics, many many more girls would be easy lays. But evolution has designed these female screens, or TESTS, to ensure that the men they fall hard for are AUTHENTIC alpha males.
An authentic alpha male — natural born or self-made — is never confused by the split personality of a woman. He knows the score (from inborn intuition or learned through experience), and when women know that he knows the score, they get WET AND BOTHERED. Like The Trumpening, the authentic alpha male PLOWS THROUGH these screens and tests and OWNS THE FRAME.
The beta male, poor sap, listens to women and gives them what they claim to want. He opens doors, compliments their beauty, keeps his hands to himself, sympathizes with their problems, and “takes it slow”. And that is why he fails.
This is why chick logic is so whack. Women really are of TWO MINDS.
And they can’t help it. It’s hardwired. They are completely unaware of their own internal contradictions.
Friend, now that you have this knowledge, use it.
Fulfill your destiny.
Go forth and…
spread the seed.
This learning takes a few years and experience to internalize. But now I can pick up the contradictions and work towards changing her mood not her mind as Krauser has said.
The one contradiction I do have trouble navigating is the apparent time waster. This is the girl who is always keen to meet up but is stiff when I escalate. I’ve met 3 like this in recent months.
It’s at this point I step back and assess is it her or me? often it’s a combination and disappearing for a while is often a good way to kick start.
Girls have very emotional memories…they remember the last feeling they had. If they were missing you, pining away for you, then when you see them next that’s where they pick up.
if you had a fight…then that’s where they pick up.
I hear ya. The worst feeling is burning resources on some chic via time and money and not getting action. Especially these days when it is highly likely > 90% chance she is actively ‘dating’ other men (yes, plural). Let’s be real here. If she’s hot, she’s hanging out/dating/whatever with multiple men.
This isn’t necessarily directed at you wala, but just sharing how I handle the same issue.
Here’s how I deal with time wasters or a potential time waster (ones that actually meet up, not txt orbiters): I set a strategy and exit plan, and stick to it. Almost like investing or healthy dieting and exercise. Set your boundaries, and eject when your loss threshold is reached. And stick to it.
For example it’s rare that I’ll ever go past a 3rd meet if I’ve not gotten any action. She has to pass a boat load of qualifiers to get to a 4th meet without putting out.
Anyways, say it’s 3rd meet and you’re able to isolate her and initiate some sexy time and then she pulls the E brake. At that point, I talk to her about it. Calm and collected.
I use the same bullshit terms women use to break up with guys. And in this highly emotional scenario (it’s actually a seduction routine in itself) I’ve been successful so many times in getting action, and am successful the other way in cutting the anchor loose. It’s win win.
Some of the lines I use to initiate:
(don’t sit next to her, move to other couch or chair away from her)
-I don’t think this is working for me
-I’m not sure I’m feeling this
-you might not be the girl for me
-I know you like me, but i’m not sure about some things
This gets the hamster going. Lol. It’s the onset of a boot to the curb. And women fear rejection like they fear aging.
Some will flip out. Which is good. You have dodged a major time trap. Stay quiet and let her leave.
Most try and reframe and gain control of the conversation. If they bring up, “just bc I won’t hook up or have sex etc.” This is good. Get the sex topic out in the open. Say, “yes”. Pause. Stare at her. Dont fill the space. If she flips out. Good let her leave. If they say “well why or what?’ Still lead it to sex. “It’s moving too slow. And that’s ok. Not sure it’ll work.”
Now here is the thing. Every time-waster I’ve had in this situation is projecting. These aren’t precious snowflakes with loyalty and good feminine nature flowing out there eyes, they’re your run of the mill young American women doing what they do. Every time I’ve been in this situation I already have enough behavioral indicators to know where she’s at in her bullshit dating cycle. And more often than not she’s in attention whoring mode and really doesn’t give that much of a shit about you. She’s hanging/talking/keeping options open with other dudes AND you. She has no problem eating and drinking your money, gaining ego feelz, then cutting younoff. But, she is attracted to you. And you can work it.And throwing her a challenge like this works for you and either ejects her or moves the ball along. Also note she could be viewing you as BF material and is trying to not be a slut and post pone sex.
Now the tipping point is if she concedes her femininity and expresses her desire for you in a genuine way. That means she shows sentiments of being honest and lets you know she likes you. This is good. And can be molded into sex. Escalate. She’ll resist. Rinse. Repeat. Have fun. Any seductive cad can see the onset of arousal indicators. Tell her sweet nothings and get going.
If she starts getting cold and cunty and tries to lecture, let her. And show little to no reaction. And try and get her to leave without incident. Don’t try and argue logically. Just passively let her be a bitch.
I know this not only because of getting laid because of it, but also by having to deal with the fallout of bitches sending hate txt and talking mad shit and spreading rumors etc etc. bc their ego is so bruised. And also to see them out within days with some beta schlub and them trying to get your attention. Fuck this happens all the time. Funny thing to is the more aloof and disregarding you are of her temper tantrum, she’ll come down from her emotions in a day then have attraction for you. Lols…fucking chics. Funny how she could have just been sweet and told you that, eh?
TL;DR
Set a 3 meet cap. If you can’t isolate her by meet 3, eject. If you can, and she resists sex, tell her it won’t work and see what happens. You want to keep your cost (time and money) minimized. Remember, she’ll eat and drink all your money and lose your number, feel a spike in her cunty ego and forget you like a queef in the wind.
This is solid
Ripp-san you big genius!!!
Solid. I actually did this with a girl and it did work, I ended up banging her. Same girl wanted to meet up. I blew it off.
One of the wisest things I ever read on this site was “imagine if you could only get a hard on if someone was mean to you”… Sums up this OP and Ripp’s expansion perfectly…
Cats are not dogs.
Ok, I could use your and the Chateau’s take on something.
I have a 22 year old (im 31) fb who is flakey as hell with texting.
We have been off an on for a year, mostly off. The sex is incredible (body 8/face7, petite with big tits, very sweet and feminine girl), and I have managed to screw some of the millennial pornstar bedroom antics out of her. Shes much more submissive and overwhelmed in bed than at first, which I see as a win.
Its like she went from thinking she was fucking me, to realizing Im fucking her.
I would have been willing to date her, if she wasn’t such a slut.
We will meet up one week, then she will flake out, then I decide to stop texting her, then she texts me out of the blue with a “hey you!”.
Every time I decide to stop texting her, she comes back in a few days.
She parties and is constantly going out “with the girls” on the town dancing or whatever. I know what this likely means.
I guess its obvious I don’t have multiple big titted 22 year olds to choose from.
I think Im going to keep ignoring her until she apologizes for being such a flake.
Once she went black, she’ll never go back…
@Ripp
Your comment came a great time. Will def use this tonight. Thanks.
@Bill Brasky
Why the hell would she apologize? Even if she did something wrong (which she didn’t), she won’t apologize. Your butthurtness is only gonna cause problems. Go get yourself some more big titted 22 year olds and you won’t put so much importance on this one.
@Bill.
Been here many times also. Lighten your emotional investment with her. In fact, as best you can, extinguish it.
You’re dealing with a typical young slut swinging from cock to cock. When she’s in this party cock swinging mode the worst you can do is set LTR type expectations.
Here is where your head needs to be at:
1) advance your sexual agenda with her. Introduce toys, whatever. Try new shit. This is THE type of girl to do that with.
2) minimize all costs. Sure grab her a fucking smoothie or coffee (or make her get it) in the morning. But by all means don’t ‘date’ her.
3) accept she is probably banging other dudes. At least making out and maybe a BJ here and there. Maybe. Here’s the thing. Most guys are beta and will just be txt fodder. Be the alpha that sends her off walking funny.
4) Suggest competition to her by ignoring her for a few weeks at least. Force yourself to get new prospects going. When you do reconnect drop subtle hints about dating/hanging out with other chics.
5) extract information out of her. This is my favorite 007 shit. Forge a relationship on another level about guys she’s talking with and tell her stories about crazy chics. This is perfect pillow talk in bed while she has your cum crusted on her face.
The knowledge you will gain and the frame control experience is priceless. You’ll find out so much. Chics love to talk about me and dating. She’ll see you in a new light too as this alpha sex cad that knows how to fuck.
Lastly and this is the most important part, and segue payoff from point 5: hit chics hang out with hot chics. Pivot her to start relationships with her friends. Take this asset and put it to work for you.
The worst you can do is beta out and be “she needs to apologize”. Nope. She needs to take it up the ass and let you film it. Then tell her friends.
You want her saying to her friends: “OMG billy jammed a vibrator up my ass I couldn’t believe he did that. I kinda liked it.” Her friends will be tickled and your stock will rise.
You don’t want her saying -nothing- because you were too needy. And she’s back on the cock carousel.
@pulsotic
not butthurtedness, silly boy, its called a natural urge to discipline a disrespectful cunt. My inquiry for guidance pertained to any potentially sex positive means.
I do see now that expecting her to “apologize” is ridiculous, but so is pretending that there is nothing wrong with intermittently ignoring a man who is fucking you. Its disrespectful.
@Ripp
You understand…”Be the alpha that leaves her walking off funny”…race you to the bottom, brah
Pin this one to the top of the site.
I realize you are really just describing dynamic and often “grey” areas of human reality, but this post really illustrates the contradictions at the heart of this blog, at least the “game” side.
One minute you casually acknowledge the genetic simplicity of it all – the girl could have had beta boy sons from a beta boy husband, OR cad sons from alpha husband. This is clear reality, and clearly how women see men.
The contradiction comes in the prescription that anyone reading this for advice should go forth and spread his inferior beta male seed.
Why? So his (cute, white) daughters can be whores of the oligarchs, his sons their castrated slaves? Im sure the eskimos are all for this plan.
I still think you’re coming from the right place, just being honest.
You’re making the implicit, faulty assumption that alpha- and beta-ness are entirely genetically predetermined. But any behavior can be modified by the envronment or even by deliberate brainwashing. What we have in modern society is exactly this: the systematic repression of alpha behavior through social conditioning and millions of would-be natural alphas who are mentally (or even physically) imprisoned by a culture that has been sharply twisted to serve the feminine imperative. These are the men who will really benefit the most from CH’s work here.
It’s possible I overestimate the genetic component of this, though it is obviously a major part of it.
“systematic repression of alpha behavior through social conditioning and millions of would-be natural alphas who are mentally (or even physically) imprisoned by a culture that has been sharply twisted to serve the feminine imperative.”
I think this is right on the money. It may be that a certain subset of potential alpha men are more open to demoralization and indoctrination than the rest…The high IQ alphas, or lesser betas, perhaps.
It makes sense that they would have much to gain from spitting out the poison.
It also makes sense that they would be deliberately targeted by the institutions, given that they are obviously more of a threat to the establishment than more simple minded alphas.
I agree that genetics are a major influence. That’s why its takes a concerted campaign to suppress it.
I don’t know whether its that the high IQ alphas who are morw susceptible to this or that they are the highest priority targets. These would after all represent the greatest threat to the overall agenda we’re talking about.
The Nature -vs- Nurture debate simply cannot be examined honestly without considering the most baleful influence of the Eskimo campaign to destroy Western Masculinity, which has been raging since at least 1960, and which was put into hyperdrive in the mid-1990s with e.g. “Friends” and “Seinfeld”. For all intents and purposes, American Boyz haven’t had a solidly masculine role model in the J00Stream Media since forever.
Exactly. And those who do show solidly maculime tendencies (at least the white ones) are propagandized, punished, and/or drugged into submission.
I get what you’re saying, but isn’t it good for everyone to know the score, to be made aware of the socio-biological reality of things, even if they cannot necessarily do anything to alter it or “hack” it?
Now there’s an interesting question…
I suppose I’m inclined to see ignorance as bliss, but I’m also a truth addict.
You are implying alpha or beta is 100% genetic and has nothing to do enviormental factors. The Y chromosome programs the male nervous system for the capacity for abstract thought. That’s why successfully breeding within a feminine primary epigenetically programs that males DNA to pass on the information used to defy all the odds. Make no mistake that without the guidance, or at the very least, a good example of a male role model, you’ll never get anywhere. No matter how “naturally alpha” you think you are.
Brotherhoods and men’s circles were the norm in traditional society. Ever pause to wonder what they could have been talking about?
Agreed.
My biggest beef with the manosphere is that we haven’t formed real life groups.
The “two minds” makes me think of the Moist Robot view of humanity espoused by Scott Adams, whereby we have little to no free will and are slaves to the programming of our subconscious mind, and we use our rational conscious mind to rationalize the programming (innate biological programming and social programming).
It’s just that women have a higher cognitive dissonance than men.
And blue-pillers have a higher cognitive dissonance that red-pillers.
Man I have been reading your stuff for a while now, you hit the nail on the head, in fact you broke it, woman talking here, when we recognize a Alpha, its game on lol no holds bar, hell for get about opening car doors, not interested in that, small potatoes, the power that Alpha males has, is what interest us lol
Are you the new re-incarnation of the Mossad Psy Ops program known alternatively as “Nicole” and “t*h*w*a*c*k” and “James Blonde”? I wonder what the Mossad’s internal codename for that initiative might be – maybe “Project Lilith” or “The Mandingo Sanction”?
By Way of Deception Though Shall Wage War
thou
I’d say pure “Nicole”. lzozlzozloz
Here Obviously, upon one of CH’s most incisive, helpful posts– you regress to troglodyte raciss crap. Shame on you.
This triggers the JEW OF THE DAY mechanism!! Hope you enjoy the bio on someone who outdid, outsmarted, and out-helped-humanity more than you!!!
Solzhenitsyn documented that y’all’s Eskimo Mafia ran the Gulag there in Siberia – who’da thunk they had Synagogues for M@sturbation purposes, way the heck out there in the middle of nowhere? Probably not much of a market for a proper Brit Milah Blow Job, however. Whadda Hebe ta do? Sheeeee-yut.
Why do you keep saying lol? Is this Yareally in disguise?
That was my first impression as well… judging by style and pattern, I would say it’s been obvious that there’s been some self-congratulatory sock-puppeting on certain threads.
Yeah, I just love how absolutely everything someone posts who he doesn’t agree with is a Mossad agent, a troll, etc… Cap’n, up the meds, dude!
yeaaah
Good post
There are also two minds of “taking it slow”
When a girl’s friend asks what’s happening in the girl’s relationship:
With an alpha she will reply: “we’re taking it slow until he’s ready” with a wide eyed enthusiastic head nod, stinking of a silent desperation
With a beta, she will reply with a dull sigh followed by “I dunno how I feel about him really, we’ll see”
Such is the distinction between the chooser and the chosen
lol yup winner winner chicken dinner. This girl i have been seeing casually for 6 months just told me we “will take it slow” since i have given her no indication of commitment. lol no shit we will take it slow i will never commit and have told her. Her hamster continues to rationalize this exactly as you said. This post is one of CH’s best, i agree with the peanut gallery it should be perma-posted at the top like 16 commandments.
Ah Monday morning, when I fill out my phony work search details. It’s called Unemployment Game. Plausible Denial.
Working Here
Get to know our culture, the values we share, and the ways we help you develop in your career. See where your skills and diverse perspectives can take you.
WTF?
Lady Galadriel replacing the quota mud-ette. Make it a much more pleasant work environment. Been thinking about some Lady Galadriel memes. More when I get a chance.
i can’t help but agree with you, galadriel would make the work environment a more pleasant place.
I smirked, Cate Blanchett is above average but not a real beauty. Well this time you can’t say a “mud” pulled the rayce card. I’m sure there are plenty of black doctors who earned everything they have worked for. Let’s not get unreasonable here, Ben Carson isn’t the only black doctor who has ever held a scalpel. I know this site has pro-whyte, even anti-blck under and overtones but I can deal with it because there are very smart people here with regards to game and women which gives me great value. Being in Texas, in a city with a predominately whyte population, I have to know how their hamsters work and who better than whyte men to teach me.
Fugue – whaddup wit dat moniker? Kneegrowz play dey bluez chordz, not dat contrapuntalism shiznat. Fo shizzle.
Funny how the darkies always forget to mention that most of the blowback against negroes stems from their own behavior… both in the real world AND at the chateau.
And as per usual suspect, they point at the exception and make out like that obviates the rule… and justifies the MSM’s agitprop to keep throwing the exceptions out as if they were the usual reality… both in pro-negro and anti-white memes.
With the further disingenuousness of acting like the MSM is not doing it with purposeful intent.
Yet when the chateau fights back in the name of honesty, we’re dismissed as “pro white/anti black”.
@ Fugue: ‘There’s a negro brain surgeon in Peoria, therefore race is irrelevant.’
Basically, this is a form of innumeracy. Guess what? Most CH readers are numerate – they understand what a rate is, for example.
They also understand that only the White race could even generate a maxim so detrimental to society as a whole as this one: ‘people should be judged only on their individual merits.’
Greg, you’re projection and arrogance is absurd. Why so cynical Greg? I believe if you got know me you would see that I am not a bad person and am actually quite likable and in fact challenge most if not all your stereotypes and generalizations.The fact that you group me with other negroes shows that you judge people without an acknowledgement if not an awareness that the person is an individual with their own mind as if you refuse to acknowledge facts contrary to the facts you accept. You assume that individuals in a group are all the same because they share the same race, culture, religion, etc. That is a superficial analysis which is based on pure thought not empirical evidence that is based on interaction with persons with a normal affect response and with no real attention or knowledge of what is actually happening. I am fully aware and responsible for my behavior and take offense when I am marginalized and demonized because of my race and not merit, competence, integrity, character. I mean how can you when you think of me as so flagrantly inferior when in fact the only knowledge of me you have is my race? Your rhetoric implies that “we are all the same” despite individual psychologies, talents, and experiences. The idea that you would rather use stats, “facts”, history, science to judge an individual without knowing them or having any further knowledge of are the actions of a computer not a human being.
The other idiots aren’t worth the time. Greg I know you have a brain in your Europid cranium. Surprise me
I’ve often said, here at the chateau, that everyone has their “good negro”.
The trouble is, when push comes to shove, even the good ones side with their own, and that ol’ envy of YT shines forth.
When you have a hornet’s nest in your yard, you can’t let it slide, merely because most of the hornets won’t sting you… because by the time you discern the good ones from the bad ones that will sting you, it’s too late.
And the good ones will never… EVER… side with you against the other hornets.
So take a hike, negro… you brought this upon yourself by not policing your own.
Not since “Dear Woman” :
Not sure I like the new definition
Nobody in the manosphere talks about how to end a relationship. I know it’s tough to do. One tactic I have found effective is to profess interest in Professional Wrestling.
http://www.salon.com/2015/09/07/a_woman_with_ambition_dating_down_as_my_career_went_up
LOL. You know that moment when she calls you and you see her number on your phone.
Ignore it.
that’s hilarious and brilliant. i suppose telling her you’re planning to quit your job and go live off the grid would work too.
Star waxing poetic about the simple pastoral life in a log cabin in the forest, no electricity, make up, TV, lies. deceit…
Women are players who recognize like only. Higher cooperative value is unknown to them. I keep forgetting ppl (of both sexes) are animals and go back to my old habit of using my personal civilized reality and values as a universal. If I don’t stay in practice, I revert to square one very quickly. Obviously time and money must be sufficient to put in the time at target rich environments.
> “universal” ——— Universal principles wandering blindly within a morass of Tribal-induced nihilistic insanity. Sadly, in this day and age, it’s not a good recipe for randomly bumping into success.
“Women are players who recognize like only.” Wow, just wow.
Even Freud couldn’t put it more succinctly.
“Man’s primary love object is woman, woman’s primary love object is her children.”
The good thing about Freud’s maxim is that you can sneak it in and women will agree with it, thereby implicitly admitting they don’t five a flying fuck about you sans Status and Checkbook.
But your car, or your flat-screen TV don’t care about you either, but you still want them around–be like reality doug and face the fact that a woman is more like a possession and less like a moral entity.
human sexuality is so complicated. chivalry is bashed here, but it developed as a code from people who I can only imagine did fine with women. today it is associated with pathetic men and high status men alike although for the latter it takes on a different meaning. i also don’t know that i see two minds in play here with women because it is probably true they don’t like the pathetic guy in the movies that gets the girl in the end, maybe, but my personal experience, apart from the media, is that they tend to openly display their affection for celebrity men. i don’t think i have ever heard a girl saying she was attracted to men that served her.
It’s “chaff,” not “chafe.” Chafe is what happens when you don’t have a bikini bridge.
+1
This site is excellent when the posts focus on Game and NOT white nationalism.
Think on this for a moment: Game is purely r-selective (as proven by today’s article), but white nationalism is fundamentally K-selective. How does one reconcile the conflicting difference?
Finally, aren’t black males ahead of the curve on Game lifestyle? This blog’s teaching has its roots from the black community; with that being said, is Game going to lead the white male down the path similar to the black male, you know, with single moms and bastard spawns?
Your comments are dreck no matter where you post them. Run along, concern troll.
> “Run along” ——— all the way home to Tel Aviv.
Hey Mitchellstein – For the remainder of the time that is left in this thoroughly artificial and unsustainable environment, where the womenz and the R-selected lot are subsidized by the K-selected White men who built Western Civilization, it makes sense for White men to understand and hack the lady feelz.
@Mr. Mitchell
Start your own blog? Capitalize ‘White’?
Mr. Mitchell, disregard the troglodyte trolls narcissistic enough to view YOU as the troll. Raciss creeps are receding a bit here as they are smacked back into their grimy pickup trucks by the educated and thoughtful.
One of the most irritating thing about stupid and ignorant people is they DON’T KNOW they are stupid and ignorant, but rather feel they are in on a special secret–often an idiotic and kindergarten level one like racism.
About single moms and bastard spawn, any spawn is better than no spawn, and often in times of social turmoil the linkage between men and women is broken such that it is literally impossible to maintain a healthy father-child bond even if the man has loyalty.
In particular I remember the movie about the Russian sniper with Jude Law, where in the ruins of St Petersburg with enemy troops yards away he conceives a child before being killed.
Extinction is forever.
Educated and thoughtful, what a joke. if I hear the same lame ass Jonas Salk example out fo you one more time I’m calling your landlord to kick your ass once again. You’re completey outclassed here intellectually and you make these lame appeals to the official prudent man corporate approved consensus opinion based on lies and deceit. You guys must be getting nervous to send back the hasbara crowd. Go start your own blog.
It was Stalingrad not St. Petersburg, intellectual giant.
One of the most irritating thing about stupid and ignorant people is they DON’T KNOW they are stupid and ignorant, but rather feel they are in on a special secret–often an idiotic and kindergarten level one like racism.
Project much?
Heh, heh… and Metro Onan then wonders why he gets his ass kicked… or laughed at… wherever he goes.
It’d be amusing to get all of the chateau’s apparatchiks in one room, just to see what they look like…
… ‘though I wouldn’t be surprised if, of the dozen or so names, only two or three faces were attached.
And then they could all get one in the yarbles, if’n they had any… eunuch jellies, they.
@Mr. Mazel: “This site is excellent when the posts focus on Game and NOT white nationalism.”
Let’s put this through the “Is it good for us J’s” test.
Surprise, surprise: turns out CH focus on Game seems good for the J’s because it seems to lower the opinion of White men for White women. But CH focus on White Nationalism is definitely not good for J’s.
Let me remind new readers: read all the Game articles you have time for. It’s very important you have that Eureka moment where you think ‘God, for my whole life I’ve been lied to about the nature of women.’
Because one reason it’s so important is that your next Eureka moment should be, ‘If they lied to me about women my whole life, how likely is it the J’s are telling the truth about themselves?’
Now we see why Game only SEEMS good for the J’s.
It has to be said, his final question is very appropriate to my area: 20 years ago and beforehand, a single mother was a complete anomaly. Now it’s a rampant phenomenon. Granted, the boyfriend is often around, availing of her single mother welfare windfalls, but it remains to be seen if we’ve got the next Ethiopia on our hands. (caucasian style) not that I think I’ll be around to see much of how it pans out
My working theory is that women have their limbic brain closer to their consciousness than men.
Beta behaviors drive a female to rational thoughts… and dryness.
Alpha behaviors drive a female to irrational limbic thoughts… and moistness.
What is Alpha? I believe that Alpha is situational, and cultural. But a good rule of thumb is to think about the following:
We all profess that because game works women are therefore less rational. To a point this is correct. BUT we assume that a women’s Alpha detector is more advanced than it really is.
Example: Girls falling for mass murderers.
So… given the above I propose that a woman’s alpha detector is nothing more than an assessment of a man’s demeanor and actions to AVERAGE human behavior.
If a man’s behavior and actions are far outside of a woman’s AVERAGE. She becomes interested at a deep limbic level.
Now this limbic attraction must be difficult to trigger so it’s safe to assume that 95% of male behavior is within the range of AVERAGE and triggers rational reactions.
But the 5% or Alpha behaviors triggers irrational moistness.
All an Alpha man has to do is NOT do what the 95% of men are doing in any given setting.
This is why Naturals always enter a room an LOOK around.
This is why Naturals are always more hansy.
This is why Naturals do things that push the limits of human decency.
Naturals KNOW how to act and be that 5%.
Bullshit.
Women know exactly what they’re doing.
The L. Planet
Maybe they do; maybe they do not.
What remains interesting to me is the fact that no mother, sister, aunt, etc. of a young male relative who was struggling with this – even to the point of the agony love-less-ness and genetic extinction – has ever let him in on it by giving advice that might actually work on their fellow females to rescue him from his fate.
If that ever has happened, I will change what I just said. But I have never heard of it. I have never heard even a rumor of it.
Have you?
Chicks dig their own graves.
From the Right Reverend T. Lawrence Shannon:
http://www.tubechop.com/watch/6826569
My friend was a natural but I never thought about until years later. As a young man, I attributed his great ability with chics as ‘that’s just the way it is’. I became friendly with some of his chics, most of whom were sweet, and thought they could lend me some insight to his way. Being chics, they couldn’t really describe his way as anything other than, ‘he’s sweet.’ Frustrated me. I enjoyed the company of many chics just because he was my friend and his chics had friends or sisters, etc. Chics said he was good looking but that wasn’t the only reason they adored him, they said. Having some knowledge about chics at the time, I knew it wasn’t just his looks. Hell, there were better looking men around who never seemed to get laid. Being a natural, he couldn’t really give me advice beyond saying, ‘they know what they’re doing. They hate being bored.’ And, ‘you’re either hot or cold and on or off. The best thing is to be on and hot. On is the most important because you can be cold but as long as you’re on, you’ll have the most success.’ As basic as it was, that ‘advice’ served as the foundation for most of my success with chics. I almost feel bad for young men who can’t get laid because they’ve been told, by both sexes, ‘just be yourself.’ Or can’t learn from their natural friend or don’t believe how easy it really is.
I’ve been the best friend of two naturals and they were both great at escalating and assuming the sale. The problem with most men is they get a level of comfort with an interaction before it turns into a bang and don’t push it to the next level. If you are constantly escalating and assuming the sale, she is always in reaction mode. Almost any guy can have a “hook” to get interest, but without that escalation, she’s going to get bored.
The other thing these guys were great at is the “take it or leave it” style of negotiating what the next level would be.
Like everything, it didn’t work all the time, but worked enough that both dudes had triple digit notch counts by their twenties.
Is that really a good thing?
When bitter betas try really hard to be alpha they come across as sour and butthurt. Their “gaming” is charmless, intuitively inept, and laced with spite. Here, their pain drips through every word they write. You can see their lacerated, self-hating, shit-genetic fail.
They must get over the bitterness first, and that takes real balls. Action, objective self-analyses, and more action, not arguing like a faggot online.
“It says on your chart that you’re fucked up. Ah, you talk like a fag, and your shit’s all retarded.”
— Dr. Lexus
That movie could’ve been so much better, of course, but that’s a good scene. ” ‘Go away! Batin’! ‘ ” heh
Trump’s got what voters crave; he’s got electrolytes.
This isn’t just another post.
This is the distilled essence of female psychology and its interface with male desire. God how I wish I had known this when I was younger.
This post should be placed in its own heading along with the Sixteen Commandment, etc.
Knowing how to manage frame, recognize shit tests, and defeat your own worst tendencies gets you a Master’s degree.
Knowing why gets you the Ph.D.
Gold …. just gold.
Contender for beta of the year.
Warning, folks, this will trigger your upchuck reflex.
wow. that was really painful to watch.
Just looking at the front still pic already had me (((shakin’ mah haid))).
The fact that the “male” in that vid has apparently had sex with a number of women should encourage every non-alpha that this stuff isn’t really so hard.
If that mewling eunuch can get laid, what is your excuse?
CAN’T STUMP THE TRUMP
If you disable the enemy’s hand, he can’t push the voting lever.
CH good job!! I’ve got a big boner here down in central station!!!
Really like the second order evo psych idea being done automatically by the female “mind”: Player’s son’s and daughters will be facile, aggressive and fertile and her conjoined seed will have more success.
It’s like evo psych calculus.
You know, Ukrainian men think you’re a creepy thief of their women. I’ve lived overseas all of my life and never once had a problem. Dickheads usually do. If you haven’t figured that out yet Jerry, your shit is weak and you’re not the genius of human nature you think yourself to be. That is why your landlord kicked your ass. Hanging out in the Irish Pub and the other expat hang outs gets you labeled as a predatory American and if you have a shitty personality already, you get your ass beat eventually.
Kicking your ass to prove a point was more important to him than the rent he might collect from you. That speaks volumes in a counrty where your rent is probably one month’s pay. Since you don’t speak Russian, I’m guessing the ex-pat clubs are where you hang out. We are not very popular there at the moment for that reason. Better to keep a low profile and not step on so many toes. People sense it when you despise them.
I am curious if the westerner going to eastern europe looking for sex with hotties has become a stereotype there. a lot of people talk about doing that so i wonder if all the talk has ever led to sex tourism on a large enough scale that people there noticed.
Longer post in mod, but the short answer is yes for the ones seen as predatory by the local men.
There’s a lot of gaping logic holes in this post. I’d expect this kind of thing from a women.
I won’t bother listing them but your basically raising a Nature vs Nurture type discussion.
The main issue with Beta males is that they enter a relationship using sex as a commodity.
Eg I’ll give you ‘stuff’ in return for sex.
Were as an Alpha male doesn’t.
Eg I’ll give you ‘stuff’ in return for sex.
Were as an Alpha male doesn’t.
Slow on the uptake are we? This blog is about WHY the Alpha doesn’t have to.
The sad [really tragic] thing is that going to an outdoor cafe, or to a picnic on a blanket in the park – and sipping on some nice wine, and munching on some cheese and crackers, and just TALKING to a pretty girl, especially if she’s an excellent conversationalist, is insanely fun. This idea that you can only tap it if you trick her into buying prole shiznat for you, like Rolling Rock and Little Caesar’s, is deeply anti-Civilizational. Not to sound all Matt King, but there’s a place for James Bond’s suave and subtle sophistication – being an Apex Alpha with really good manners.
Sometimes the best game certain people should use is knowing when NOT to speak (or type).
Follow your own advice
Carlos, I always do and I just did.
You must have missed it first time round.
Look, I agree that an Alpha shouldn’t get too talkity-talkity with his womynz [as though he were some d@mned yappity little Chihuahua beta/gamma]. But in terms of having a fun time, I don’t wanna drink warm stale Rolling Rock and eat soggy pizza. I wanna sip on a nice cold Chardonnay – although I can see the argument for letting the Brie get all warm and runny and then you spread it on just like butter. [Or, better yet – SHE spreads it on for you.]
The evolutionary psychology concept of ‘modularity of mind’ is useful here. Robert Kurzban has an excellent book about this concept called “Why everyone (else) is a hypocrite”.
The idea that we have one coherent self that oversees and chooses all of our behaviour is demonstrably false (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split-brain#Combination_of_both_tests). We are instead comprised of many modules which serve specific functions in a context. There’s no good reason why evolution must by default wire every new module to every existing one, and in some cases, they work better when they don’t have access to the information in other modules.
To the extent that we think we have a coherent, reflective self, it’s function is well summarised as our mind’s press secretary, or rationalisation hamster if you will. The hamster’s primary task is to project a valuable social image, not to assess mate quality or resolve sexual tension. Disarming ASD is all about giving that press secretary briefs so it doesn’t have to come up with its own that involves not fucking you.
If men from sites like this fool women into loving them what will happen? Ugliness. I’m willing to bet that most men on here look like crap.
To me this blog conjures images of beautiful women coveted by shady and bespectacled ugly cunts using crafty tricks and wordplay to turn the emotions of the beautiful against them. It’s like Nazi propaganda with the blog playing the role of the envious and satanic Jew snake.
You’re not very bright either apparently.
I tend to agree that most of the “more game/less politics” fools here are poor specimens…
… ‘though probably a heapin’ helpin’ less pathetic than those who carry the Cathedral’s water in re NAH-ZEE and RAY-CISS hand-wringing.
Most people in general aren’t ugly. It you simply go by genetics it will follow a bell curve. 20 percent beautiful to good looking, 40 percent average, 20 percent bad looking to legit ugly.
The thing about looks especially for men is that it can greatly be influenced by correct style and taking care of oneself. If you’re a guy that isn’t in the 10 percent butt ugly, then you’re good to go with simply being thin and having a style about you.
Take this study about dark triad and looks.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/psychology-uncovers-sex-appeal-dark-personalities/
‘The dark triad score was positively correlated with their “dressed-up” attractiveness – a finding that mirrors previous findings. However, the dark triad score was not related to ratings of physical attractiveness in the dressed-down photos. In other words, people with dark personality traits are not seen as more physically attractive than others when you take away their freedom to wear their own clothes and makeup. People with dark personalities seem to be better at making themselves physically appealing.’
Dark Triad guys cared more about their appearance thus were skilled at making themselves look better than the non Dark Triad guys even though when not allowed to dress up they were rated the same.
The rule of thumb concerning looks for me is that thin, groomed and dressed reasonably nice. That’s it. If you do that as a guy, you’ve hit the check box for most women’s requirements in that arena.
It’s really not worth it to obsess over being as good looking as possible. Learning and excelling at art/sports and learning and using social charisma is way better than killing yourself to try in vain to become an Adonis which usually isn’t even possible for most guys with steroids anyways.
The “bell curve” only applies to the roll of a dice or other similar phenomenon in statistics. It cannot be applied wantonly to just anything…especially to something as subjective as who is considered “beautiful” or “ugly”.
The misuse of the “bell curve” is a prime example of “social science” trying to legitimatize itself by making itself seem like actual science.
I am deeply offended by you spewing Jewish propaganda. It’s horrible and should be investigated by thought police ASAP…
What society really needs is a little less entitlement and a little more know your station. If you’re not brave or handsome or charming or good at fighting then settle for a frumpy bird, you know it makes sense. Don’t undermine everything around you for a brief shot at the moon.
I agree that most folks are a bit more uppity than their talents merit these days…
… but you can’t blame a man for stretching out his arm, ‘though his reach may exceed his grasp.
I can and do blame the man. I blame Hitler for Stalingrad when, other than being too ambitious, you couldn’t say a word against the guy.
I thought we were talking boy/girl romance… :duckface
Ah, the butthurt left-wing troll, out to try and disprove the depressing reality of what women want by posting blog comments laden with sarcasm. Seriously? Generation X did sarcasm to death back 20 years ago. Still riding that old, tired horse?
No comments in the world are going to change the brutal reality of what lesser men need to do to get dick in pussy. It’s depressing what women are really like, and I wish the world wasn’t this way, but here we are.
I can and do blame the man. I blame Hitler for Stalingrad when, other than being too ambitious, you couldn’t say a word against the guy.
I know its not popular, but you could gain say Hitler on a lot of things. His officers didn’t think much of him and he used to go into hysterics chewing them out. That’s always poor form as a Military leader. I recall a Quote from von Manstein that Hitler complaiend to hiom that his officer’s didn’t always obey him. Von Manstein replied that his officers always obeyed him. Let it be said as well, that Hitler had the finest General staff in the world at the time. He never trusted them because most were aristocrats. I have met many aristocrats in the Bundeswehr. All of them had a strong sense of noblesse oblige and duty to the nation, so Hitler was misplaced in his distrust of them, in my opinion. That is part of the training of a well bred aristocrat in an enlightened absolutist system of government.
well women do want signs of beta attainability… from alpha males. its their sexual utopia, much like unlimited sex with hot chicks is the male utopia. its the old f. roger devlin article… women want to mate with the best man, who then commits to her. but its a logical impossibility, because if he ceased mating with other females, he’d cease to be the best male. chick flicks = porn.. in porn men are drawn to the intimacy of POV, the allure of untarnished youth, giving them quick sex. but girls who do that are sluts, you cant have quick intimate sex on demand with unlimited innocent girls much like girls can’t have the most alpha man who also commits.
idk if it has been said, but I disagree (or read badly whatever).
the reason for romcoms is the same reason than guys look at war movies and want to be like Rambo; they would love to be like that. However, at the end, if a guy is asked to go to war, feeling take over (“fucking shit, it might hurt”) and people follow these feelings. When behaved like in a romcom (beta) there just isn’t any feeling and women are not going to follow it.
Isn’t this the whole point of the game? Understanding these underlying feelings and pleasing them, rather than trying to please the brain of a girl (which has ASDs and all other stuff).
The chodes can use the new “superlike” button. Alphas can still go super neg.
http://fortune.com/2015/09/09/tinder-super-like/