intersectional feminism just means submitting to a different man pic.twitter.com/rpxd1hBlDh
— Jonatan (Nine Trey Yangsters) (@JonatanThree) March 22, 2019
Women Will Submit. The Only Question Is To Whom They Will Submit
Mar 25th, 2019 by CH
115 Responses to “Women Will Submit. The Only Question Is To Whom They Will Submit”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
MMA
(Mary Mother of Asskicking)
-
It isn't fascism.....yet.
(and the sooner it happens, the better)
-
From the forest you were born, to the forest you shall return.
-
There does appear to be a loose parallel between jewish and Quaker histories. Both groups were (rationally) discriminated against in many economic and cultural sectors. They responded to the discrimination by pouring into the occupational fields which were still open to them: banking and industry.
The wealth each group nepotistically accrued from those endeavors allowed them to more effectively subvert the surrounding society.
-
It's good to visualize the geographical origin of many of the groups we discuss. Geography and group attributes are strongly associated through the process of evolution.
The Quakers originate predominately from the English Highlands. Mountain people tend to be more clannish (ethnocentric) than lowland peoples, yet the Quakers very early on developed a pacifist ideology that seems to contradict accepted theories of ethnocentric group psychology research.
It is possible Quaker pacifism was a form of group fitness behavior, by way of virtue signaling harmlessness and victimhood that would allow their group to more easily take advantage of host societies.
-
The Quaker Question.
I link this video for discussion purposes. We have a Jewish Problem. Do we also have to grapple with a Quaker Question? QQanon?
I'm open to this theory, primarily because I believe it would have been very difficult for jews to subvert Hajnal White nations as thoroughly as they have without some help "from the inside".
-
"H1B abusers"
This rhetoric is damning of Trump's real intentions. The crisis facing us isn't the problem of "abusers" of the system. The crisis is the system ITSELF.
We should be going after the H1B program in its entirety, not just the abusers of it.
Same with immivasion. We should be deporting all of them, not just the "violent criminals".
The System must be repealed.
-
The Tyler Robinson conspiracy theories remind me that Occam's Razor has taken a beating over the last decade.
-
Robinson's father turned him in, and I doubt the decision to rat out his own son was a difficult moral quandary for him, knowing that his degenerate son was fucking a dude in his cosplay foxhole.
It must have felt like excising a demon from the family, and restoring the reputation of his good name.
-
"Here's where Cameron goes berserk."
"Aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh (my dick)!"
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
@CH
You have Manic Overpoasting Disorder (MOD). Will you please consider using the “schedule poast” feature provided by WordPress?
I’m a reasonable man but this madness has to stawp.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Perhaps the cnn feed would suit you better.
Shut the fuck up, fag.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Islam promises submission
women want _________
do the math convert and take over
LikeLiked by 1 person
>>>>> Manic Overpoasting Disorder (MOD)
I hope Gunny’s doing okay.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lately, with CH’s binge poasting, I imagine him working night shift at the NSA or the DIA, and on his days off, he has to drive several hours, over to West Virginia or New Jersey or similar, and find a public wifi hotspot, and poast furiously on a burner laptop, before tossing the laptop into the trash and heading back to DC for his next shift.
LikeLiked by 1 person
That’s a lil weird dude.
Plus, you are “caring” and you are very much in the light.
LikeLiked by 1 person
>>>>> “That’s a lil weird dude.”
D@mned straight it’s weird.
But why else would CH binge-poast about five or six items in an hour, and then completely disappear for 48 hours or moar?
Something weird is happening in CH’s life.
And DC is a very weird town right now.
He11, JnDC and Dr Trav are about to friggin ki11 each other over the question of who’s the bigger DC bada$$.
LikeLike
Nah, travioli wins, he is hitting the gym far more than I am these days. I just get better pussy overall so he gets a sandy vagina about it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Dr. Trav
Ah yes, but chixx want EXCITING SUBMISSION. Islam is that same old boring 5-times-a-day routine. They want a bartender who can tell them stories; the motorcycle ride in the middle of the night; snorting coke off fine linen napkins, the works.
Then, submit and have mindblowing sex, to their perceptions.
LikeLike
Truth.
I had a “strong independent women.”
Same bitch is a line towing girl now that usually refers to me as “Daddy.”
LikeLike
Line towing … look at the quiver-lipped burka broad – last time I saw a mouth like that, it had a hook in it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Indeed.
Last time I saw a face like that was on a bottle of poison.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When out and about with her I see other wahmen respond to her with envy and me with lust.
I’m not a (insert every bemoanment of betas here).
I just do my best to follow The 16 Commandments.
LikeLike
That facial expression was very popular in Medieval art.
I’ve seen jollier phizzes in stained glass.
LikeLike
She should be part of the solution – show her solidarity with shipbuilders – and wear a welding mask
LikeLiked by 1 person
… more like stained ass – looks like she’s menstruated herself – and forgot that the rag goes on the bottom
LikeLike
Virtue-signaling is at its best when done slightly warm, without the topic getting too cold, and garnished with a parsley of mewling whining.
LikeLike
Usually when you see a face like the PM of NZ, it’s got parentheses around it.
LikeLike
….now that you mention it.
LikeLike
I live in NZ and this bitch has been in virtue signalling mode non stop. Permanent mournful virtue expression while wearing muzzie gear. She’s in heaven. Makes me wanna puke.
Oh and off topic. Every. Single. Time.
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/white-parents-are-enabling-school-segregation-if-it-doesn-t-ncna978446?cid=referral_taboolafeed
LikeLiked by 1 person
All Hebrew Day Schools must be integrated with the Black Hebrew Israelites.
LikeLiked by 5 people
Ethiopians
falling from the sky
Mana from heaven
Shooting stars of David
A haiku dedicated to gunslinger
LikeLiked by 1 person
abyssinian is the correct term
king theodore astride his mountain-top
flies eat the tears of his charcoal children
do they know its christmas
band aid
hands across ethiopia
he he he
have you ever tried ethiopian food
neither have they
(Tribute to gunslinger, part ii, with lots of obscure historical and cultural info thrown in)
LikeLike
>>>>> “Permanent mournful virtue expression”
The Creator endowed the females of our species with that w!tches’ brew of emotions precisely for the purpose of surviving the daily Category 5 Maelstrom which is a house full of six or eight ch!ldren.
Absent the ch!ldren, that w!tches’ brew of emotions heads off in search of some other Dopamine high to enjoy, and the Frankfurt School is moar than happy to provide chardonnay, promiscuity, multiculturalism, diversititty, miscegenation, victimhood and benzodiazepines as a substitute.
LikeLiked by 6 people
Cat Lady Survival Kit:
Box of Chardonnay
50 Shades of Grey Kindle Edition
Burka
Autographed picture of RBG
Vagina dryness cream
Case of batteries
LikeLiked by 2 people
New World Monkey Face Syndrome.
LikeLiked by 2 people
I really hope that each and every hijab peacocking feminshit kunt gets to experience the religion of peace first hand.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Plez plez plez!!!!!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Winter…what’s the word on the ground?
We only get msm filter NZ stuff here.
LikeLike
Mass conformity. They’re really shocked by what happened and feel guilty. Us guys look at each other about the hijab wearing crap and know what we’re all thinking but that’s about it.
LikeLike
It scares the fuck out of me how quickly this Ardern cunt abandoned the pillars of Anglo civilization. It took her about five seconds to abandon the presumption of innocence, freedom of the press, free speech, the right to own guns, and Christianity.
Didn’t NZ Labour recently remove all mention of Jesus Christ from the parliament? Yet now they’re blasting Islamic prayers throughout the entire country, and having girlcops and TV news chicks wearing fucking hijabs. They’ve actually criminalized possession of the Tarrant manifesto.
And yet, in an actual Muslim country, this hijab-wearing socialist agnostic would have had her clit hacked off by age 12… and they would have flogged her to death for living with a man and bearing a child outside of wedlock.
Sick, really…
LikeLike
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/white-parents-are-enabling-school-segregation-if-it-doesn-t-ncna978446?cid=referral_taboolafeed
Tribe at it again.
LikeLike
By (((Noah Berlatsky)))
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is conquering the West even enjoyable for Abdul and Chaim anymore? We’ve set the game to very easy mode. They don’t even have to try.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Have you been following this new horror movie where apparently pro-Trump N!g-N0gs are being terrorized by George Soros’s N!g-N0gs dressed in red?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is that the one called “Us” , made by the mulatto who created “Get Out” ?
LikeLike
As long as they eliminate each other why is that a horror film?
LikeLike
“Intersectional feminism” takes the insanity which is feminism to new levels of insanity. Actually, it’s so insane, that it’s better to live in a literal mental asylum than among intersectional feminists.
Example:
Taking your husband’s family name after marriage: horrible sexist oppression, because it’s mostly an European tradition.
Having your clit chopped off, being stoned to death, living in a harem: meh, acceptable, because it’s the “oppressed” who do it
LikeLiked by 1 person
BLACK PILL: White genocide doesn’t seem so bad when I think about how 50% of the race is fucking liberal bitches and douches with shit-eating grins.
These kind of people are always acting in bad faith and looking to stab you in the back.
LikeLike
A few times Heartiste has referenced the Story of O as an example of submission. Another good example in the “library” of pseudo-books is 50 Shades of Grey. What these books have in common is a craving, no a burning NEED, to find someone WORTHY to submit to. It’s a search that’s difficult to enact because little boys are conditioned to serve women on bended knee.
To escape Houdini-style from that trap deserves a harem, methinks.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“God is dead. God remains dead. And we have killed him. How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us? Must we ourselves not become gods simply to appear worthy of it?
— Nietzsche
The west killed God only to be conquered by Arabs & followers of (((Satan))) If western man has any sense left, he will run to his nearest (preferably)Catholic/Eastern orthodox church, wear the cross and act accordingly. This Atheist/Non-believer/Pagan nonsense needs to end.There is no power in these godless beliefs.
I leave out Lutheran & evangelicalism because Martin Luther was the beginning of the end of the west. Yes, nothing bad was going to happen when you leave it to man to interpret the bible as he sees fit. Nope, 6 billiion christian denominations? no problem… The enlightenment that followed was a cancer to the soul of the Western spirit. The ancestors of old that shed blood, sweat and tears in crusades,became martyrs and giving up everything for Catholicism are rolling in their graves. For the roughly 1000 years after Rome fell & the majority of western Europe was Catholic, no Muslim dared step foot inside of it. But western man CUCKD & started believing in this evangelical crap…we are seeing the results of it today.
Salvation is there for everyone and conversion is no problem.
Inb4 pope francis/jesuit comments.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yes, 85 IQ papist retards like yourself will save the west with your gay priests and more shitskins than all other denominations combined.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can feel the butthurt from here…
Italy (only catholic majority country putting up a fight), Visegrád Group (mostly catholic) & Slavs (Mostly Orthodox, with Catholics being in the Visegrad group, some outside) are the only ones putting up a fight to this globalization. Next time respond with logic rather than your emotions like a bitch.
Lutherans on the other hand (Scandanavia,Germany, NZ etc) WILLINGLY suck mohhameds cuck. You have to remove your biases & ponder that question.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The world was a much better place when the common man had only to trust what the Pope and local clery told him was in the Bible, eh?
God meant the Bible to be read and studied by all men, and said interpretation did not seem to bring much honor to Him or revelation to Mankind when only a few were deemed, in your own words, to interpret Scripture as they “saw fit”.
2 Timothy 3
16 All Scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching the truth, rebuking error, correcting faults, and giving instruction for right living,
17 so that the person who serves God may be fully qualified and equipped to do every kind of good deed.
The fact that finite men often have trouble correctly discerning the infinite mind of God is to be expected… but to say that the breakaway from the Catholic Church was a disaster would only hold water IF said Catholic Church had corrected their errant ways of their own accord and became a beacon of honesty, truth, and righteousness in these times.
You may not have been keeping up on current events, my friend, but let me tell you… that DIDN’T happen.
Ergo, take heed in God’s own Word, in re any fear of an extra denomination or two:
John 14:2
There are many rooms (or mansions) in my Father’s house.
LikeLiked by 2 people
thank you Greg
LikeLike
“The world was a much better place when the common man had only to trust what the Pope and local clery told him was in the Bible, eh?”
Uh, yes actually. Besides Spain (which the spanish took back eventually) Where Arabs invading Germany and Sweden? Were (((Satanist))) influencing heads of states from the Fall of Rome till 1519? I think not. Sure, there was infighting between nations for a variety of reasons in between these years, but when Muslims came knocking on the gates of Vienna, or any other western Nation, Catholics united as one & defended these sand niggers.
What do the people in these Evangelica/Luther majority countries do now? Why is it that Anglo-Saxon men, who are either Athiest or Lutheran fall to their Altruistic desires?
I’m a pragmatist when it comes to this issue. I see what works for White men, & what doesnt.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Reports of the death of White men and the West have been greatly exaggerated.
Rider, good alt-R ally you be, try not to call the game in the middle of the 4th inning… we’ve not yet begun to fight in earnest…
… and PUH-LEEZE… with images of your Pope kissing n1gger feet still dancing in our haids, and Liberation Theology enjoying its, what, sixth decade… don’t talk about the POZ of Prots.
Glass houses and all that, there’s a good fellow.
LikeLiked by 2 people
The Vatican has nothing to do with the church and certainly not this heretical Pope.
LikeLike
Come on man
LikeLike
The Vatican has nothing to do with the church and certainly not this heretical Pope.
The hell you say.
Or did you just convert to Lutheranism?
Sorry, DD… you’re stuck at the dance with the one who brung ya…
… aka “You can’t have it BOTH ways.”
LikeLike
I will agree that the current Pope is a disgrace & he doesn’t do Catholics any favors by continuing his papacy. We need another Pope Pius XII.
LikeLiked by 3 people
So you accept the lesbians bishops then and accept homosexuals in the clergy and all of the other sins I see in the Protestant faiths as they come to stand for nothing in particular? Can’t have it both ways. Theology and tradition have nothing to do with the Pope. We have existed for 2000 years. One pope or even 100 popes can’t destroy that. Good ones enhance the faith, bad ones shame it. There is no concerted effort to destroy Protestant faiths because they lack gravitas and would whither away without the mother church.
LikeLike
So you accept the lesbians bishops then and accept homosexuals in the clergy and all of the other sins I see in the Protestant faiths as they come to stand for nothing in particular? Can’t have it both ways.
What happened to the logic and reason you promised me? You can’t even see the irony in your own use of “can’t have it both ways” when speaking of the much-trumpeted sins of your own church.
You know very well my beliefs are based strongly on Scripture, and I myself have derided the Mickey Mouse false Christianity of all-too-many churches in these end times… much like the Bible itself tells us would occur.
So your usual disingenuous method of comeback is a non-starter here, and if you would truly debate this matter, debate it in good faith… again, as you yourself just pounded your chest about logic and reason.
Theology and tradition have nothing to do with the Pope.
You’re still attempting to la-la-la your way around this? Theology and tradition are inextricably tied into the chair of St. Peter, whether you want to accept it or not. Heck, one would think I’m an even better Catholic that you on this issue.
We have existed for 2000 years. One pope or even 100 popes can’t destroy that. Good ones enhance the faith, bad ones shame it.
Not really part of this discussion, and no need to belabor the obvious that bad men are not going to upend God’s Word and Plan, no matter the actual building in which both the bad and good ply their actions.
There is no concerted effort to destroy Protestant faiths because they lack gravitas and would whither away without the mother church.
Again, what this diversionary squid ink has to do with anything, I’m sure I do not know. From the days of Eden, there has been a concerted effort to upend God’s Plans, and since the sacrifice of Christ, likewise efforts (often seemingly successful) to bring disregard and honor onto His houses of both Catholic and Protestant leanings, indeed, His very name.
Now… try again with some of that promised logic and reason of which you so recently boasted.
LikeLiked by 1 person
post hoc ergo prompter hoc
whether men could or couldn’t study the bible had only ancillary relationship to whether the world is or was a better place
Literacy and the printing press enabled the common man to finally read the real words of jesus and follow them.
Don’t resist evil. Turn the other cheek. Do unto others not as they deserve but as you wish they would do for you. And basically assist in your own murder. And white men have been doing so since.
You faggots stampede over each other to get to africa to help the niggers and bring them here.
LikeLike
” The world was a much better place when the common man had only to trust what the Pope and local clery told him was in the Bible, eh? ”
To be fair Greg, for a large portion of western history, very few people were able to read. There was a need for those that could, to spread the information within books, such as the Bible.
LikeLike
To be fair Greg, for a large portion of western history, very few people were able to read. There was a need for those that could, to spread the information within books, such as the Bible.
What this has to do with the topic at hand, I’m sure I don’t know.
The discussion started with talk of Luther and bringing the Bible to the masses being “the beginning of the end”… as if general literacy and the book in hands of believers was a BAD thing, rather than the presumably better (in Catholic eyes) being merely in the hands of the clergy and doled out to the masses as per ONLY said clergy’s interpretation.
Geez, Louise… if you’re going to chime in with a point, at least make it a cogent one. Nobody said that it was a bad thing for the clergy to preach the Word to those who couldn’t read it for themselves… the problem was said clergy’s attempt to KEEP things that way as the only game in town.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
LikeLike
My favorite book of The Good Book, GE.
Jesus spends the majority of it eviscerating (((them)))
LikeLike
Absolutely wrong
When I was ridiculing “limbo” that was as defined in the catholic cult
Have you ever seriously thought for a moment that I was gonna go into scriptures looking up for limbo? jeez
Your constant repeating “it is all them, catholics” is a bit surprising to me though so let me ask you something
These supreme lunatics evangelicucks do they follow the same scriptures as you do?
LikeLike
Great posts Rider. Deus Vult! Catholics have by far the best educated parishioners and focus on philosophical inquiry. I don’t know of any Protestant sects that demand one understand their faith on the basis of reason. As Father McDermott said yesterday morning, in order to proclaim the Gospel to unbelievers, one has to step out of the faith and convince them using logic and reason in order to bring them to God. We have a great priest in my parish. I always walk away from his homilies thinking what more must be done. It is not uncommon for priests to have PhDs in the hard sciences. IQ 85 is for people who make circular arguments to bring others to the faith.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’ve never met a Protestant who could measure up to a well-informed Catholic ever.
Like when St. Tommy More goofed on Luther.
“How do you know?”
“Because I am certain.”
“How are you certain?”
“Because I know.”
“But how do you know?”
“Because I am certain.”
In this instance, GE, you are Martin Luther. You’re a good guy, but you are insufferable and you punch right.
And you’re wrong.
LikeLike
I, for one, look forward henceforth to hearing “logic and reason” from your side of the altar… thus far, all I’ve heard were nolo scriptura rationalizations of idolatry, avoidance and diversion, and a whole lotta “you’re just dumb” attempts at Alinsky shaming.
Scripture itself tells us to “reason together” (Isaiah 1:18) but also warns us in the very same book
Isaiah 55
8 For my thoughts are not your thoughts,
neither are your ways my ways,”
declares the Lord.
9
“As the heavens are higher than the earth,
so are my ways higher than your ways
and my thoughts than your thoughts.
So I find it ironic that you would on one hand declare that giving the Bible to the masses was a mistake would then in the same breath talk about logic and reasoning together to bring nonbelievers into the fold.
You remain a parishioner in good standing of the Church Of Can’t Have It Both Ways.
LikeLike
And because you say it, that makes it so… keep you warm.
FWIW, I’ve often praised King and other Jesuits I’ve known for the scholarship and formidable debating skills. I believe King said he wasn’t of that school, but he savors of its discipline a league off.
LikeLike
And you’re wrong.
Just for the record, and limiting discussion to this subthread, what exactly was I wrong about?
I’m genuinely curious, because as far as I can tell, I was merely dissuading some of the initial claims made in re Protestantism by Rider, and for the life of me, I believe I’ve made the stronger argument.
In short… I didn’t start the fight, but it would appear I finished it, barring any grandiose claims of “you’re wrong” from those still lying on the canvas.
You may not believe this, but when arguing whose belief is correct according to the God each claims to represent, you’re SUPPOSED to use the very text… His Word… upon which said beliefs are allegedly based… and feelz and opinions don’t even get on the bus, let alone take a back seat.
Because if you don’t actually believe that Scripture is God’s Word, then what’s the point of debate about said God’s church(es)?
LikeLike
Thanks, Carlos. To lighten things up (perhaps my first post was a little too fired up), I will just say that at the end of the Day, becoming a Christian, attending Church & encouraging your friends and family to do would be a good first step for our degrading society.
https://preview.redd.it/wf0r3o9faw121.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=d3d742527b15f83f744b549a92a7ea82c3e6f839
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL I’m onto you man. You can claim the stronger argument, shit, you can claim anything. Doesn’t make it so.
You’re punching right. Notwithstanding your incessant claims, no one is on the canvas except you, shadowboxing against everyone and no one in particular.
I prefer not to punch right and I certainly don’t punch down because it brings me to that level.
You’re a good guy, I like you but you are again doing precisely what I pointed out. You can’t have it both ways, amigo. You can’t be on the team and then attack members of your own team.
Unless you not actually on the team. An Army of One, so to speak.
Meditate on your own sayings. Don’t answer, don’t reply, don’t retort. Just think for a half moment.
Arguing on the internet is like the Special Olympics. You might claim a “win”, but you’re still retarded.
LikeLike
https://preview.redd.it/wf0r3o9faw121.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=d3d742527b15f83f744b549a92a7ea82c3e6f839
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks Carlos. Seeing how perhaps my first post was a little too fired up, at the end of the day, becoming Christian, going to church & encouraging your friends and family to do the same would be a great start.
https://ibb.co/Qv2r5qB
LikeLiked by 1 person
I will just say that at the end of the Day, becoming a Christian, attending Church & encouraging your friends and family to do would be a good first step for our degrading society.
On this we can agree… so long as it’s not one of them shams what has unscriptural practices, like letting women or queers in the pulpit.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Damn, I had a fine reply to Corinth that got shoah’ed, go figger.
Anyway, the gist of it was, when choosing being “the team” and God, there ain’t no “me” in team.
Well, I guess there actually is… alas, yet another observation fallen flat!
😉
LikeLike
You don’t even need to become a Christian, you just need to support the idea of the Christian nation and protect its power to mold the social order. Plenty of lukewarm believers in the past, but they didn’t want to flush everything of value down the sewer. All have their part to play and as for inter Christian debates, all I have to say is we are brothers of blood whether you like it or not, cause the Mohammedans don’t give a shit if you are a Unitarian or Opus Dei, your head is coming off.
LikeLiked by 1 person
And yet you only endorsed the Catholic posts… brother? 😉
LikeLike
Arguing on the internet is like the Special Olympics. You might claim a “win”, but you’re still retarded.
And yet you couldn’t stop yourself from arguing, telling me I’m wrong, but not in a rational debate by actually addressing any of the scripture or points I made… merely some poopytalk about “punching right”… when in fact, I’m merely “punching wrong”, truth be told… and those you tout as members of the alleged “team” have proven themselves in the past to be the furthest thing from honest men and actual “team players”.
So, if this is indeed a “retarded” endeavor, then you’re a Bozo on the same bus… and mouthing lame Cyberian cliches passing for wit from twenty years ago isn’t going to win you THIS argument either.
LikeLike
Three Is One
Carlos Danger, wannabe logician:
philosophical inquiry
Lovely, another poetaster.
…faith on the basis of reason… …in order to proclaim the Gospel to unbelievers, one has to step out of the faith and convince them using logic and reason in order to bring them to God.
Except that you can’t. If you start solely from the premises of all what can be observed in the natural world, then I will whip you hands-down in logic and reason thereupon, and completely demolish your rełigion.
I could start by imṕeaching both the origins of Scripture, and the hist0
riçity of Jesús. Your only possible protection from my arguments is if you accept on Faiţh that (1) the Bible is of divine auţhoŕity, and (2) Jesus actually existed. Without those things—well, good luck proclaiming to me a rational, naturalistic Gospel with n0 Bible and n0 Jesús.
(Some religions actually do not have the same susceptibility to dísproof; but that is here irrelevant, insofar as they can’t be proved without Faith, either. E.g., nobody ever claimed that Woţan walked the earth at a definite, historical time and place.)
But I needn’t even reach that start. Instead, I can hit you with simple arithmetic: 3 ≠ 1. With Faith, the Trinity is mýstical, arguably poetic. Witḩout Faith, the whole doctrine of the Trińity is chiłdish and rïdïculous—or worse, something some guy haļļućińated whilst stöned on Ämańiţa ḿuścaŕia: “Three is one; duuuude, deep!”
So how, in the name of God, will you prove to me the arithmetical identity of 3 = 1 using only “logic and reason”? Go ahead, now, “step out of the faith”.
…(1/2)…
LikeLike
…(2/2)…
Carlos Danger, theological poetaster:
IQ 85 is for people who make circular arguments to bring others to the faith.
By inductive exclusion of all who accept Christianity without any “circular arguments”, the logical implication of your statement is that Christianity is for “IQ 85” people. Hey, I wasn’t the one who said it.
Faith requires a starting axiom of Faith. That is a tautology, not a circular argument. It is a matter of premises: If your premises start with (1) Faith, generally; and, (2) particularly, a faith in a few basic tenets of Christianity, then you may (perhaps) construct a Christian theology that cannot be assailed by logic. But if your premises start without those things, then Christianity implodes as a structure with no foundation.
Wherefore mountains of theology about Two Truths, the most famous works of Aquińas, indeed, the raison d’être of the Schölastics—do I really need to school you in the history of Catholic theology and its reconciliation of Faith with Reason?
This is one reason why I respect Greg Eliot: I’ve seen him say, “Either you believe, or you don’t.” If Faith is deemed a virtue by Christianity, then I don’t see why that could be a problem. And by the way, that is why I don’t even try arguing Scripture with him, despite my not inconsiderable knowledge of the Bible: He seems sharp enough to know his own premises; and his premises include the express proviso that the Bible cannot be understood without Faith. Thus either he will force me onto his premises, i.e. grounds of Faith upon which I will lose, or we will reach a logical stalemate of mutually irreconcilable premises. Insofar as I can tell by casually reviewing a few blog comments, he seems to have a mighty fortress of logic built upon a foundation that I reject, because I don’t believe. From the time of the Schölastics, all of the most intelligent Christian theologians of all denominations have worked that way, more or less.
(He also seems smart enough to avoid making weak arguments for Christianity that I can shatter without lifting a finger. “LOL”.)
LikeLike
On a side note, and NOT to begin the age-old and never-satisfied debate among Christians, let me just say there are a lot of Christians, myself included, who find the concept of the Trinity unscriptural… and the alleged scriptures and man-made traditions used to support it are easily gainsaid by a good margin of cross-referenced scripture which either explain better the otherwise confused-when-taken-out-of-context alleged supporting verses or refute them outright… I’ll refrain from giving a ratio of 3:1. 😉
But that’s a debate for another day, and one which can’t be covered in a few sentences.
LikeLike
Most of the OT written by Hebes has very little truth to it. Seems like a lot of Hebe projection, wishful thinking and stories of imagined revenge or how they got over on the goyim with some con job.eg Abraham pimping out his wife so the King of Egypt bangs her. The King discovers the truth and the moral Egyptians believed that this would bring down the country so the King pays him a lot of money to leave Egypt(for some reason they just couldn’t kill him and wife) Goyim morality?
And Abram went up out of Egypt, he, and his wife, and all that he had, and Lot with him, into the south.
2 And Abram was very rich in cattle, in silver, and in gold.
*Or bragging about killing a gazillion Amalekites in a day because one of them stole a rabbis yamulke and used it as a hat for his donkey lol
The Hebes who wrote the OT were from the same people that wrote the NT so why would you just believe it?
Even if the Galilean Guru existed (and there’s no proof of this) he may have just been some popular guru in an area crawling with them.
After he either died or just went elsewhere and never returned they use his well known name and write their own story about him and all sort of agreed on the basic story and tell different versions to make it look good and not too perfect. They make this Galilean a Jew and the big Messiah who will return and kill all of Hebes’ enemies(the infidels) They spread this story around the Roman Empire but especially Rome where there’s a Hebe ghetto(probably the Hebes who burned Rome and Nero dealt with) They did this for some political purpose. Maybe get slaves who believed this stuff to cause some problems and distract Rome from them. Didn’t work they got Masadaed anyway.
On the other hand there was no Jesus and the whole thing was an invention sort of like the Russian hoax. Showing some Dead Sea scroll found in a jar as proof of anything means nothing because they, or their predecessors wrote the stuff and they may have even got their idea for the hoax from them lol
LikeLike
I could start by imṕeaching both the origins of Scripture, and the hist0
riçity of Jesús. Your only possible protection from my arguments is if you accept on Faiţh that (1) the Bible is of divine auţhoŕity, and (2) Jesus actually existed. Without those things—well, good luck proclaiming to me a rational, naturalistic Gospel with n0 Bible and n0 Jesús
——————————————————————————————–
So you accept “Faith” or you burn in the hell for eternity lolz
We must respect the other fellow’s religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart.
H. L. Mencken
LikeLike
Serve whatever gods or man-made -ism you wish… each and every observation anyone wishes to make about any particular group of scripture, whether OT or NT, has its explanation and place in the grand design of God’s Plan, though men of little understanding or no faith may mock and disdain in the conceit of their own wisdom and trying to interpret it solely by their limited view of life only on the material plane.
But as for me and my house, we will serve Jehovah. Youse yeggs do what you see fit.
And for the record, lies and nonsense seldom last for centuries, let alone millennia… and men far wiser than ourselves still seek Him.
If it were all merely a Hebrew hoax, then (((they))) would certainly be doing (((their))) utmost to encourage faith in Christ among the goyim… but as we see, from Roman times onward, just the opposite is true… albeit the effort has gained much ground over the past two centuries and has accelerated to the point of apparent imminent victory over the past 50 years or so.
But, to borrow a phrase from our pagan ancestors, there are yet Jomsvikings living.
LikeLike
And for the record, lies and nonsense seldom last for centuries, let alone millennia… and men far wiser than ourselves still seek Him.
———————————————————————————————
lies, nonsense, stupidity and all of their derivations DO last millennia
the whole history is nothing but a yuge exercise in these disciplines
lolz
LikeLike
lies, nonsense, stupidity and all of their derivations DO last millennia
the whole history is nothing but a yuge exercise in these disciplines
lolz
Not the same lie… don’t try to slough off the general failings of mankind in re stupidity over the centuries as any given lie surviving millennia, O Disingenuous One.
I had a nice reply to that whole “burn for eternity” lie as well, but it got stuck in limbo… how about it CH? I don’t have the patience to filter through it looking for trigger words.
LikeLike
but it got stuck in limbo
———————————————–
wut I hope your illustrious comment will not be stuck in limbo for eternity like a unbaptized child
LikeLike
Jesus spends the majority of it eviscerating (((them)))
Unless (((they))) invented the whole Jesus story and had a motive for doing this like an article on here suggests is a tactic of theirs.
LikeLike
More Catholic folderol… if you would bandy words with me, keep it according to Scripture, and don’t attribute some man-made fallacies and foibles to God’s Plan.
I use “limbo” according to the secular definition… find limbo in the Bible and I’ll leave the chateau forever, otherwise you do the same… deal?
LikeLike
Unless (((they))) invented the whole Jesus story and had a motive for doing this like an article on here suggests is a tactic of theirs.
Tell me something, Benway… are you just la-la-la stupid or merely disingenuous?
Innumerable times at the chateau, and even in this thread, the question was asked that, if Christianity were merely a Hebrew hoax meant to fool the goyim, why is it that (((they))), both religious and secular, take such great pains to eradicate it from public life and disparage the very name of Christ in their religious teachings?
By your logic, (((they))) should be doing everything in their power to propagate and encourage it among gentiles.
But just the opposite is true… and yet here you AGAIN try to sell this old gefiltre?
Explain the dichotomy… and none of that “working both sides of the street” bullshit, because in the case of Christ, if it were a ruse to gull the goyim, there would be absolutely no reason for (((them))) to work for and against… especially with the against side apparently winning as each day anything Christian in the public square comes under attack and eradication, ever since the previous century.
LikeLike
I’d ask catholics but they are difficult to find these days
Danger says that Pope is not catholic and from now on he accepts only Q to be infallible
The Limbo of Infants (Latin limbus infantium or limbus puerorum) is the hypothetical permanent status of the unbaptized who die in infancy, too young to have committed actual sins, but not having been freed from original sin
———————————————————————————————
It is hard to imagine something more cruel than jesus loving all his children
Imagine how sick how anti-life a dogma has to be to invent such a concept as “original sin”
LikeLike
I already know how Limbo is defined by the Catholics, thank you very much, and it’s already been dismissed as man-made mythology, so I don’t know what you’re trying to gain by belaboring the point except as diversionary squid ink to the challenge I offered you.
I’m not here to argue Catholic dogma, for if you hadn’t noticed by now, any doubt in THAT is shared equally by myself as well as nonChristians.
Now, onto your NEXT attempt at diversion in re “original sin”. Man (and woman) were given free will, and purposely defied and rebelled against God… in effect, siding with Satan.
Now, what was that you were saying about the cruelty of this being God’s fault?
Or were you merely casting aspersions upon “dogma”, especially of the man-made variety? If so, you may be more of a true Christian than you think, and there’s no argument from this quarter.
LikeLike
in conclusion though your illustrious comment dindu nuffin it is still guilty of original sin lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
LikeLike
I should have known attempting to dissuade you of your inanities wouldn’t be more than casting pearls to swine, but perhaps some of the silent onlookers will gain wisdom and be able to gainsay like lies and petulance in their turn among peers.
LikeLike
What’s the matter, cort? Not taking me up on my challenge?
Is that a tactic admittance of ‘gots nuthin’ in re your Limbo squid ink?
LikeLike
What is your challenge lolz?
I think I told you already for those of you wanting to have a “serious discussion” about the fables written by sand jews 2000 years ago as words of God I reserve some of supreme expressions of western thought such as mocking, ridicule and disdain
Should you want to discuss religion as man made, as perhaps necessary an ingredient in building a successful civilization in general or any religion accomplishing (or not) these tasks in particular as well as any other question concerning the need of ordinary man to fill the void in his souls dug by the brutality of everyday life I am all yours
LikeLike
Try 7 to say anything whatsoever!
LikeLike
The challenge was to find mention of Limbo in the Bible, since you brought it up as a method of neener-neenering the Word of God and disparagement to all Christians, rather than admitting it was a tale spun of whole cloth by men, as I pointed out.
You were the one who decided to make squid ink out of Limbo… I assumed by bringing up the ridiculous concept from the religious angle, you were voicing some disdain for Christianity in your mistaken belief that it was part of scriptural teaching, and so I pointed out it was merely mad-made mythology and therefore worthy of disdain.
And instead of you admitting that you were wrong about holding the Bible in disdain over that particular idea, you just la-la-la’ed onto the next piece of snark?
if you don’t mean for your words to be taken seriously, then why bother jumping into a discussion that I presume others are serious about, especially something as important as why we’re here and where we’re heading.
If all this “God stuff” isn’t of interest enough to be taken seriously, what kind of bratty little punk jumps in with snark, looking to disrupt the conversations of adults?
You’re admitting you merely chimed in to make a pest of yourself? Well, at least you’ve found SOMETHING you’re good at.
Let’s just keep losing then.
LikeLike
More wasted time and effort…
I get mighty peeved when it seems as if the only way that Christianity can protect itself intellectually is with an Index Librorum Prohibitorum.
(And for the record, the post I just repeatedly tried to make in various forms was moderately sympathetic to Christianity! It just mentioned some things that, regardless of munging, seem absolutely prohibited—e.g. the title of a pragmatic pro-Christian book that Mr. Eliot once asked me about before, by an atheistic Aryan scholar of Śáńśḱŕíţ. Antidote for poetasters.)
LikeLike
I think I told you already for those of you wanting to have a “serious discussion” about the fables written by sand jews 2000 years ago as words of God I reserve some of supreme expressions of western thought such as mocking, ridicule and disdain
The irony is, the things you’re choosing to mock, ridicule and disdain are the misconceptions, lies, and man-induced myths that have NOTHING to do with true Christianity.
In short, you’re not only missing the very target you WANT to hit, you’re not even serious enough to listen to the folks proving to you that you’re aiming at something else which is in TOTAL agreement with your ridicule and disdain.
Not the measure of a smart soldier, insisting upon continuing his “friendly fire” follies.
By all means, mock false Christianity, as we Christians ourselves do… but have enough character and bråins to at least listen to reason and target foe rather than those who share your disdain for falsehood.
LikeLike
cortesar, a quick question:
So you accept “Faith” or you burn in the hell for eternity lolz
Could you propose an adequate reṕlacement for Chrisţianity in the West? Not a mere theory, not a small cult, not some refined exercise in pańtheism satisfactory to a few Aryan intellectuals: An organic mass religion. Thanks. I have spent many years studying this problem; so did men far exceeding me in their intellect and scholarship. Thus far, no solution has been found.
Men need religion. I have been saying that repeatedly, almost since the very first day I arrived at le Château. I say that as a lifelong atheist who, if you must know, privately detests Christianity more than all the other naysayers here put together. At this point in history, do you have any brighter ideas?
LikeLike
Mr. Eliot:
Innumerable times at the chateau, and even in this thread, the question was asked that, if Christianity were merely a Hebrew hoax meant to fool the goyim, why is it that (((they))), both religious and secular, take such great pains to eradicate it from public life and disparage the very name of Christ in their religious teachings?
Explain the dichotomy… and none of that “working both sides of the street” bullshit…
It’s not “bullshit”. I have explained to you before something about the Jews that I have not seen others mention; here is the most succinct possible summary:
The Jews are a racial-religious group who sees everything in racial-religious terms. In point of fact, for (((whatever reason))), Christendom was synonymous with Europe and the White West for sixteen centuries. When (((they))) express hatred for “Christians”, translate in your mind to “Aryans”. When (((they))) spít on the Christ, as their T@łḿud commands, they are spitting on the primary religious symbol of a race whom they identify with Aḿalek, inter alia. [This is a slightly inaccurate rhetorical flourish: Germany, i.e. racial Teutons, is the Aryan nation specifically identified with Aḿalek, to my knowledge.]
(Don’t argue your Bible here. That is the Jewish view. You cannot interpret the Bible for the Jews, any more than Mr. T or cortesar can interpret the Bible for you.)
An argument you will find unanswerable: The Jews indubitably hate ancient Aryan religions far worse than they hate Christianity. If I were to take the time to consult old notes (and then wrestle with m0db0t), I could provide you some eye-opening bibliographic references on how, even within the past 10-20 years, the Jews are crowing their Abrahamic triumph over “paganism”. All must submit to ÝḨVḨ.
(Don’t bring up here the Jewish promotion of costume-playing “neopagan” cults. That is the (((Cultural Distorter))) at work, busily distorting. The sight of hippie “Wiccans” who practice homosexuality and contraception while doing “fertility rituals” should tell you all you need to know about the sincerity of Jewish-promoted “neopaganism”. Those lefty cults are actually Kabbalah, wrapped in a thin veneer of ańcient Aryan symbols as bööb-bait. The self-proclaimed (((“naţion of pŕiests”))) is most expert at pedding silly superśţitions.)
…because in the case of Christ, if it were a ruse to gull the goyim, there would be absolutely no reason for (((them))) to work for and against… especially with the against side apparently winning as each day anything Christian in the public square comes under attack and eradication, ever since the previous century.
It is a purely anti-White attack, with religion as the vehicle.
To illustrate: I don’t celebrate Christmas; but when I see the Jews attack Christmas, I take offense, because I know that they attack it as a symbol of me and my whole race!
And here, you also misrepresent the Jews: (((They))) do actively promote Christianity, just as much as they attack it. Especially since they captured all mainline churches in the twentieth century. The Jewish right hand pushes Chrisţian Ziońism, the Ántipope who kisses a nigger’s feet, and an “interfaith” “Juḑaeo-Chŕistian” unity that is antithetical to traditional European Chrisḑendom. Meanwhile, the Jewish left hand slaps your goy face over Christmas.
The whole thing is a (((Tier 666))) Minḑfşck.
LikeLike
Mr. Eliot:
I’ll refrain from giving a ratio of 3:1. 😉
Fine by me. 😉 Theologically, I have no dog in that fight. I did say that given Faith, the unity of the Trinity is “mystical and arguably poetic”. My argument here is not with the Christians who specifically use that as a symbol of how God is beyond the logic of this universe, far beyond the Reason of mere mortals. I grew up in a Catholic household, so I should know!
I was replying to Mr. Danger—who, being not cut from the same cloth as Aquinas, claimed that he could “focus on philosophical inquiry,” “step out of the faith,” and “convince them [unbelievers] using logic and reason in order to bring them to God.” Very well, you learned philosopher: Let’s start with arithmetic!
As for you, Mr. Eliot, I invite you to hereabouts interject something about men who think themselves wise being made foolish. In pretending to prove Faith with Reason, Mr. Danger applies to Faith the wisdom of this world. Did I get that mysterious parable right in your Book? —Per your Luke 8:10, “through seeing, they may not see”, how could I find the secrets of the kingdom of God, when I am not guided by Faith?
P.S., go on, shake your haid about what I could do for Christian theology, if I were a believer. I have spent some time studying the major internal problems of Christianity: From the reconciliation of Faith with Reason, to the excruciating theological tarpit of the0ḑicy, to the (ahem) historical problems. I know most of the best answers to these problems. Of course, the ultimate answer always comes back to Faith! Whereas I don’t have even an atom of Faith, let alone a whole mustard seed.
LikeLike
Mr. Eliot:
I myself have derided the Mickey Mouse false Christianity of all-too-many churches in these end times… much like the Bible itself tells us would occur.
Here, have some William Blake:
The Vision of Christ that thou dost see
Is my vision’s greatest enemy.
Thine has a great hook nose like thine;
Mine has a snub nose like to mine.
Thine is the friend of all Mankind,
Mine speaks in parables to the blind,
Thine loves the same world that mine hates,
Thy heaven-doors are my hell-gates….
Both read the Bible day and night,
But thou reads black where I read white.
As if he were writing to you personally, Mr. Eliot!
I know full well how much such men as you, Mr. Eliot, have been marginalized for the past half-century.
In your condemnations of “Mickey Mouse false Christianity”, you are expressing the Weltanschauung of old-fashioned White Christendom against the Jew-churches. I have tried to explain to you the absolutely fundamental difference between you and them: They are purely (((Satanic))) cults, who in no way worship the same deity.
Your Jesus is quasi-Aryan; their Jesus is a Jewy-Jew! Now, go back and read that Blake passage carefully: “Thine has a great hook nose like thine; Mine has a snub nose like to mine… Both read the Bible day and night, But thou reads black where I read white.”
I don’t think you truly understand how fundamental the difference is. I am drafting a reply to Dr.Benway elsewhere on this page, that may elucidate. I will finish it later—it is difficult, because I am actually trying to avoid bashing Christianity insofar as possible while still being intellectually honest here. Whenever I can get around to that, take it as you will—I hope that you will at least get out of it how completely Jewed the mainline churches are, even worse than you obviously do realize.
LikeLike
Why does the Pope have that (((star))) on his funny little hat, bro???
That (((star))) has ZERO historical relation to David but IS a satanic symbol.
The catholic church died with the words “call no man on earth father, for your Father is in heaven.”
LikeLike
It’s an Aryan symbol like the swastika.Probably the shield of David an Aryan King that was around long before anyone heard of the nomadic Hebes and was not a Hebe symbol.It was taken by modern Zionists as a symbol of Jews a couple of hundred years ago. These symbols were common among gentiles and were appropriated by the Jews. The only thing associated with Jews is the menorah, a candelabra.You see it depicted on the Arch of Titus when they sacked the Temple.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The way I understood it, Solomon was said to have used it during the time he got involved with the worship of the pagan gods of his numerous women and thereby displeased God.
It’s obviously a hexagram, which was long-known and used in occult ceremonies, witchcraft and other odd practices.
Whether its origin is Aryan or not, I have never heard any convincing evidence of such, but I admittedly have not studied the subject overlong.
LikeLiked by 1 person
@Eliot
why is it that (((they))), both religious and secular, take such great pains to eradicate it from public life
What is good at one time may not be good in another era.
What is effective in one era may become useless in another and Jews did not wipe out Christianity, it’s been dying for centuries.
The same techniques do not always continue to work and you have to come up with something new, like Liberalism.
LikeLike
“God is dead. God remains dead.”
Rider, to cut down to almost nothing a long comment that I began writing before I got sidetracked below:
Nietzsche is one of the most distorted and misquoted men in all of history. Your blatantly out-of-context twist on him is fully as sensible as that of moody teenagers who wear “God is dead” T-shirts. Yet if possible, it is even less sensible to segue from a pot-shot at Nietzsche into an attack on Luther (!).
Inter-denominational Christian infighting gets lots of (((“LOL”))), for a reason. Have you earned nothing since the Wars of Religion? Catholics vs. Protestants vs. Catholics—God forbid that some Mormon should show his face around here! I have no dog in that fight, although I am quite peeved by the unthinking (at best) abuse of one of the philosophers whom I most admire.
Nietzsche fully recognized that with God being dead, Man was in a perilous position—walking on a “tightrope over an abyss”. He accurately predicted that post Christianity, mankind would see the rise of nihilism. You cherry-picked a tiny piece of his statement of the problem, and wholly ignored his solution.
I must call a spade a spade: That is either ignorant or dishonest of you. It cannot be otherwise: Either you don’t know what you’re talking about, or you are intentionally misleading the reader.
This Atheist/Non-believer/Pagan nonsense needs to end.There is no power in these godless beliefs.
Secondly, it is telling that you group “Atheist/Non-believer/Pagan”. That is a logically disconnected string of words, one of which is a pejorative for ancient Aryan religions—all self-evidently either strung together without conscious thought, or worse, deliberately conflated so as to confuse and brainwash the reader.
And firstly, Nietzsche, whom you quoted, provided a philosophy that is immensely powerful—as I can attest. But it is only so, for those few who are capable of embracing it. I don’t advocate it to others around here, because I know that few can even understand it. You evidently don’t, and don’t want to.
Whereas ironically, your abuse of Nietzsche here does less disservice to him than to Christianity. For the sake of White survival, I will sum it up as so:
Historically, Christianity did work much better when Scripture was only read and interpreted by the hierárchical Catholic clérgy. But on the other hand, Luther was a moral giant—“Here I stand, I can do no other!”—and he fixed some serious problems in Catholicism, e.g. the dysgenic, Biblically unsupportable, and then relatively recent ban on márriage of clérgy. Both Catholics and Protestants have sometimes protected Jews, sometimes fought them. Etc., etc…
Six of one, a half-dozen of the other. Pot, kettle. Mote, beam.
Both Catholics and Protestants (and any Mormons) here: Would you please just believe your own respective denominations without sniping at each others’?
In the past century, the only Aryan unity that has defended Europe as a military force was Hitler’s. Not the Catholic Church. Whereas Hitler enforced a rule that men were allowed freedom of worship, just as long as their creeds were not Judaized racial poison. Thus, Catholics, Protestants, and various types of non-Christians all stood shoulder to shoulder as brothers-at-arms. That is the type of unity that your sowing of discord destroys, rather than builds.
(I here ignore the fact that in this thread, Rider, your grouping of all Protestant denominations as “Lutheran” is as nonsensical as your interpretation of Nietzsche—especially in America, which was always historically broad-brushed by Europeans as a Calvinist country.)
LikeLike
P.S., Rider,
Inb4 pope francis
Well-informed Catholics know that the Church has been usurped by a string of Satanic Ántiṕopes since the moment when, in 1958, a non-Catholic (automatically-excoḿḿunicated M@ś0n) first infiltrated the paṕacy to prepare for the coming total (((ćoup))).
I here tried to post a more detailed statement on this. It is based on information principally obtained from scholarly, ordained Catholic sources. Unluckily, it is deemed sinful in the sight of M-d. This is the second time in the past few weeks that I have tried to post the same information somewhere here.
If the human moderator would be so kind as to let that out, I think that it would be a service to traditional Catholics who can distinguish between their holy Church, and the temporal epiphenomenon of a human organization that has been usurped by Jews and Fr33ḿ@s0ns. Otherwise, those who are interested may contact me through my site. I can provide references to strictly traditional Catholic sources, some of which are obscure; obviously, I would not suggest that devout Catholics should trust an atheist’s theological opinions about Catholicism.
P.P.S., before anybody asks, Łefebre was a Júdas Goat. At a critical moment in history, he effectually prevented actual Catholics from organizing a Roman Catholic Church to replace the sham squatting in the Vaţican. The Church has previously survived schisms and anţiṕopes, with Catholics quickly rallying around a real Pope and preserving the apośtolic succession. It didn’t this time, thanks to him.
LikeLike
This goes with the NZ news one
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 12:04 PM Chateau Heartiste wrote:
> CH posted: “https://twitter.com/JonatanThree/status/1109206588034899969” >
LikeLike
They submit to whoever openly makes them; Game leads to Trump. Attempts at subterfuge or structural dominance; it’s up to you guys.
LikeLike
The hamster recognizes foreign men showing up and not being killed by local men as dominant. The hamster can’t perceive the Alpha of State standing by protecting both he men and the hamster from getting what they deserve and deeply need, respectively.
LikeLike
The Only Question Is To Whom They Will Submit
Well it sure as sh!+ isn’t going to be to AOC’s Gloryhole Soyface Fan
LikeLike
There’s really no such thing as rape. It would be better described as virginity theft/fornication if some girl gives up the cherry without her father’s blessing. Once it’s popped, who gives 2 shits about whether or not she “consented”?
LikeLike
Stick to cats (re submission) ladies .. stick to cats ..
https://www.wdbj7.com/content/news/Dallas-area-woman-mauled-to-death-by-her-own-pit-bulls-507596891.html
LikeLike
I think that a back-hand or beer-bottle to the teeth gets your point across.
LikeLike
I knew that JFK was banging Dickenson but Ronnie too?
LikeLike
They asked for it. Give them to it.
LikeLike
You’re all confused. You need to make the muzzies submit then there will be no question who the White females will submit to.
LikeLike
A female looking to submit should surprise no sane man. A race, especially a wildly accomplished one, desiring to submit to any tribe that is willing to dominate it, as is the case with Western Whites, should surprise any sane person. This is likely to be the first instance in human history for that to happen to San advanced society.
This makes Africans look shrewd. Some Africans long for the day of colonial rule. The former colonists long to be ruled now by Africans
LikeLike