Feed on
Posts
Comments

Shot:

From Talia Lavin:

The truth of the matter is that anyone who willingly declares themselves [sic] a Republican is aligning themselves [sic] with an administration whose official policy is to torment minorities, to empty the public purse both for private gain and for sheer cruel parsimony, to strip away healthcare from the afflicted and to comfort the wealthy.
***
Anyone who is a current Trumpist might as well be an ICE agent ripping an 18-month-old child from its mother’s arms, or shipping a five-year-old boy to Michigan to dream of his father and weep in a stranger’s house.
***
One companion to the legion of Trump-voter-as-curious-oddity portraiture is the endless stream of op-eds prevailing upon liberals to be more tolerant. To cease being smug. To simply reach across the aisle, grasp a hand, and speak softly, leaving the big stick at home.

To which I say: tough nuts, sugar. When they go low, stomp them on the head.

Chaser:

From AnotherDad:

I have no problem with this Talia Lavin creature.

We just don’t belong in the same nation. She can live in her ICE-less, borderless, feminist utopia for as long as it lasts and i can live in a normal Western nation–America.

All the world does not have to be sane and beautiful. There should be a place for crazy, slimy ugly creatures as well.

***

JackD: You (and others) keep saying stuff like this but basically you are espousing a partition and civil war. Did not go that well the last time. Short of partition/expulsion/violence/self-exile, do you have any plan for living peacefully in the same nation as Lavin and her kind (especially if they become the majority)?

***

Short Answer: You got a better idea?

Longer Answer:

1) The “nation of immigrants” (immigration forever) or worse “open borders” program is essentially a death sentence. It means the US ends up getting shittier and shittier until it’s so crowded and mediocre that no one else wants to come … and immigration can finally, blissfully cease. That–immigrationism–*alone* is a bigger fault line than we had in the 1850s when the quarrel over slavery was mostly between at least between related Anglo origin groups, and with high-quality, good-faith leadership (which unfortunately we didn’t have) could have been tractable. And beyond that we have the sheer nuttiness of the left that you see in say the gay-marriage hysteria (round up the Christian cake bakers!) or “transgender” nonsense.

In sum, the left has an end-to-end “dead man walking” agenda, which is hostile to men being men, women being women and together having replacement fertility and instead pushes population replacement. Basically it is genocidal towards white Americans.

Given that, if we don’t win, what’s the alternative but to try and leave?

2) As i’ve said many times before, the most important thing about saying “separation” is its propaganda value.

The plain fact is the Democrats coalition-of-the-fringes is parasitic on the white American nation. Even its most prosperous metros–NY and Washington–are prosperous precisely because they extract through finance and through taxation from a large prosperous white (or formerly white) nation. (Bay Area admittedly a bit different.) It’s precisely the fact that generations of white guys–my ancestors–have built up such a rich prosperous nation, that these parasitic fringes can exist.

(This is, if anything, even more obvious when it comes to immigration. Why are immigrants here? Because white guys built a better nation than their ancestors did back home … and they want a piece of it.)

White people standing up for themselves and saying “Fine, you have your multicultural, open-borders utopia. We’ll pass.” is useful because it unmasks the actual “Who whom”. Despite all the whining about oppressive white men, the reality is the reverse. The fringes can’t stand the thought of white people having their own nations, taking care of their own business, working for themselves rather than providing loot. White people are their serfs. Proposing separation unmasks this.

[…]

People with different cultures belong in different nations. That’s the gist of it.

America absorbed a lot of people back-in-the-day with the assumption they would–over time–be able to adhere to the Anglo American nation. That’s over–deconstructed.

It’s clear now, we are not people of one nation. We don’t even seem to be people of the same universe! Personally i would even call the mental milieu Talia Lavin operates in a “culture”. But whatever the hell it is, it isn’t mine and it’s not the fairly sane and reasonable American culture i grew up in. There’s really no point in even pretending to have something called “politics” between us. We’re not in the same “polis”.

Majority or minority there are a *lot* of people in America, who still think like me and value being part of the old America that was part of the Western Civ. We have the right to carry on with that. It says so in the Declaration, and i can feel it in my soul.

Beautifully stated. The case is made for peaceful separation. Will we get it? Probably not, but we have the moral high ground to demand it.

Demoralization agents like JackD who sneer “the separation didn’t go so well for your side last time” are arguing from a disingenuous inference that the facts on the ground before Civil War I resemble the facts on the ground now, as Civil War 2 looms. It’s nonsense. CW1 was a regional war, demarcated by clear large-scale territorial holdings, between competing White Anglo-ethnics. America now is a hodge-podge of races, delineated not regionally but along an urban-rural divide. JackD’s “side” in Civil War I is today concentrated in coastal shitlibopolises. The other side is everywhere else.

And guess who has all the guns and the sympathy of the military.

Two weeks of blockades cutting off the water, food, and internet supplies to the big shitlib cities would end Civil War 2 before it got off the ground, and the peaceful separation can commence.

139 Responses to “Freelance Comment Of The Week: I Can’t Get No Separation”

  1. Winter says:

    The people who rule aren’t dumb. They’ll never go to open warfare unless they know they’ll win. They’ll just carry on the genocide exactly as they’re doing it.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. mendo says:

    CW II will be over as quickly as Grenada. . .

    Five minutes of firefights. five weeks of surfing

    Liked by 2 people

    • dblr619 says:

      ….ONLY IF the m1lit@ry is sympathetic to (us).

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Focus on their weak links- the supply chain and women and minorities in combat units. They’d have to draft ghetto niggers and invaders almost immediately. It’s not hard to steal an artillery piece if its commanded by some fat assed woman sergeant who needs to watch her stories. You never directly engage. Sympathetic eyes and ears would be every where. Attack their families. At least part of the military would split off. They couldn’t win against a guerrilla army in asymmetrical warfare.

        Like

  3. How can one post a picture of the lovely Ms. (Miss?) Lavin, who calls herself a partisan?

    Like

  4. BrachaBenedicta says:

    Why haven’t they done the blockade yet, then? What’s it going to take? It sounds like most white people aren’t even awake to what’s going on.

    Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Because 63% of Republicans (the good “fiscal conservatives”) are too worried about the interruption to their finances and sportsball to actively support any sort of separation, let alone a civ war II. Weaponized individualism along with uber-selfishness. None of them really care about the Nation now, or its future. The future is for “other people to worry about”.

      Liked by 3 people

  5. cortesar says:

    One week ago, a gunman killed 50 people in a terror attack at two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand.

    Today, women around the country wore headscarves to remember the victims and show solidarity for the Muslim community: https://t.co/kUsM7VDjG0 pic.twitter.com/BJwNngJaGU

    — CNN International (@cnni) March 22, 2019

    Like

    • cortesar says:

      in the meantime

      Little girl of 5 approached by two muslims:

      – You want my dick in your pussy?– It’s fine, i’m gonna fuck you, stop cryingpic.twitter.com/gumgvbU6qF

      — VIVA (@vivareturned) March 22, 2019

      Like

      • cortesar says:

        at the same time in bronx sub-humanity reaches its peak

        muzzies or ni66ars which of these 2 sub-civilization forms tops the pyramid of savagery

        Wth? pic.twitter.com/Mpt3Vb0XuX

        — Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) March 22, 2019

        Like

      • Baron Julius Evola says:

        I hope billions of Han have seen that video and are slaughtering Uighurs and Central Asians.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jay in DC says:

        I’m shocked it was an old black granny he curb stomped w/ a foot to the head. Normally they save that savagery for whites, so there is that at least…

        They are a sub-species, it is patently obvious to anyone with eyes. Even monkeys aren’t this savage, they give apes a bad name.

        Liked by 4 people

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Seriously…CNN and the rest of them do not see this photograph, of mostly ugly cat ladies, backfiring on them?! It is just going to push men with normal T-levels away. They are not sexually attractive, so White men are not going to be saying, “Hmmm, if I want to tap that I have to get on board the POZ train, I guess”. Most of those women would look better in full burkas. In fact, I am wholly in favor of full burkas for leftist bitches to wear everyday.

      The Left over in NZ were waiting for this event to steal guns, do weird shit like this, and posture over how great diversity is to the nation. I would doubt if they planned and assisted with it, especially since the shooter’s manifesto NEVER mentions the JQ (which for a normal woke White man is the 10,000 pound elephant in the room).

      Liked by 3 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        The tall one in the blue jeans and the green scarf has very nice hips.

        Like

      • Jay in DC says:

        One outta 10 ain’t bad right Cap? :duckface:

        Also, maybe it is ok this is happening. These bitches are all genetic dead ends for a variety of reasons. Interestingly, even though they are the dregs of the keg for normal white men, they are still top shelf pussy for thirsty muzz. There women are fat and hairy for the most part. So even a busted middle age white wahmen w/ a pink pussy is a huge step up. Like I said, this entire thing is about capturing genes.

        As much as Cap spamming that petri dish pic annoys me, he is 100% on target. They want to capture our genetic fitness through our wahmen but annihilate us as men. This is the same thing that happens in that dish and has been going on since we started clubbing each other to death w/ bones in tribal cave wars.

        So maybe just let these bitches roll over to sharia and get them away from us. The only problem is, they can still vote…

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “One outta 10 ain’t bad right Cap?”

        Would bang.

        [Well, at least in an alternate reality wherein she was Pr0-L!fe.]

        Like

    • Amon Ra says:

      It would be cooler if one them had a ” Slut March ” t-shirt on.

      Like

    • Baron Julius Evola says:

      Islam may be on to something. Please put those ‘women’ in full burkas.

      Like

    • Mistral says:

      Looks like 4 out of 10 of them know that they belong on their knees.

      Like

    • Anonymous says:

      The new NZ anthem…

      Like

    • Anonymous says:

      Cower in place… please be nice to us if we kiss your muslim asses and grovel enough! (Bootlicking is not impressive– makes insulting jokes about France out-of-date now, though.)

      Like

  6. Jax says:

    CH nails the prevalent point regarding a CWII. The first was a geographic war that pitted two distinct populations against one another. Besides the fairly clear demarcation line between the populations there was the social divide. You had the urban, industrial north vs. the rural, agricultural south.

    CWII will not occur under the same conditions mainly because the pressure points in society are completely different. CWII will be a war defined by ideology and heritage, not geography and socio-economics. When you stratify America under the ideological and cultural parameters what you essentially have is heritage America vs women, pajama boys, and their diverse replacement contingent.

    That is what these fools do not understand. The bulk of the left wing population is women. Are they truly going to fight for their utopia? We all know the answer.

    Let us just imagine that the shitlibs muster an army of third worlders and pajama boys on the promises of endless pussy in the new feminist utopia. How long will a gun hating diversity project being cheered on by gogurls last vs a highly motivated native born population that controls the bulk of the military and is the most militarized civilian population in the world? The idea that CWII would be anything other than a quick, decisive victory for heritage America is laughable.

    They know this too. That is what they want to avoid that scenario because they know they will lose. For the left victory will come by slowly subverting America into subjugation and extinction. Unfortunately, patience isn’t one of diversity’s virtues.

    Like

    • Just Another Deplorable says:

      Or fortunately

      Liked by 1 person

    • Amon Ra says:

      The leftist ZioAmerican government going against heritage America will consist of more then women , and turd worlders. It will contain most of the security apparatus of the US, all the various armed agencies, the national guard, regular military, and police depts. All who will just be ” doing their job”.

      This doesn’t mean the situation is unwinnable, but, dont kidd yourself, a majority of the huwhyte, ” patriotic ” Americans will go after us in a heartbeat.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Not if you attack their families for them being traitors. Burn down a few of their houses and see how much they will do their jobs.

        Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Unity of the forces of diversity of the Left (homosexuals, feminists, Jews and other non-Whites, druggies, welfare layabouts, etc.) is very, very easy when it comes to go to some polling station to vote for stealing more stuff from hard-working White men, or attending some anti-fascist march, but the unity will quickly fall asunder if a Civ War II erupted and the bodies started stacking up. And, in fact, they would most likely turn on each other once all the food and water started to run out, making them easier to destroy. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, binding them together other than their common (easy to maintain, at present) hate for straight, White men. Ironically, it is the White man’s society (keeping the lights on, the heat on, and the food and water rolling in) that allows their loosely tethered unity to exist in the first place.

      Like

  7. snarkwolf says:

    A much simpler solution would be to minimize the power of the federal government. Overturn Wickard vs. Filburn. Get rid of most laws passed after 1912. Let the fed handle external defense and immigration and such.

    Over a generation or two, a form of assortative mating would ensue, where people move to states more suitable to their individual priorities. Everybody wins!

    Liked by 1 person

    • R.G. Camara says:

      Wickard vs. Filburn is the Obergefell v. Hodges of that era.

      Like

      • snarkwolf says:

        Obergefell? Maybe. -We have yet to see how it plays out. The narrow issue, in that it involves a small number of people, makes little difference to well over 90% of the population.
        But dark forces will try to push the penumbra, God only knows to what.

        Like

  8. R.G. Camara says:

    Mueller report is in.

    Trump is clean.

    Already, the narrative is shifting—-but let’s dance on their graves anyway.

    First they led us into unending foreign wars.

    Then these exact same folks tried to coup the president with a fake investigation.

    Thankfully, the second prong failed. For now.

    Like

  9. snarkwolf says:

    Most especially, DC would have a much smaller number of employees, federal workers and those who work to influence the federal government.

    This would produce a bonanza of suddenly much more affordable housing in a nice part of the country.

    Like

    • Jay in DC says:

      The funniest part to me about the DC phenom is that the most aggressive white shitlib virtue signalers are also the most clueless. They all live in these shiny new high rises and pay exorbitant rents to (((owners))), meanwhile, they virtue signal maximally.

      What they DON’T know is, those high rises did not exist even a few years ago. They have been steamrolling these poor down-trodden n1ggers they claim to love so much out of the city into the hinterlands of PG county, MD. The nogs can’t afford the property taxes anymore because of the white shitlib gentrification. This is how fucking clueless these people are and also shows, like that video from Sweden, the ‘we care’ is nothing more than words.

      If you –really– cared you would never move there to begin with. Because you just literally evicted another black family that has probably lived there for generations so you can have your ‘green space’, easy walking distance shopping, and soy latte. It will be incredibly lulzy and max schadenfreude once the pets turn on them and pay them back for their hollow BS.

      It is part of what disgusts me so much about lefty whites. Nigs are a very quantifiable element. They are simple and predictable. These people on the other hand are the ones you should save your maximal hated for and the ones that should be the target of any future ‘memetic warfare in meatspace’ that anyone trys to enact.

      Blacks hate their guts too and they are so sheepish and apologetic they damn well know it which is why they must get that guilt out of themselves any way they can.

      Liked by 2 people

      • The blacks don’t belong in any part of DC. Or Baltimore. Or Detroit. Or Oakland. Or backcountry Louisiana. They belong in Zambia, Gambia and parts proximate and any dislocation they suffer between here and there is not dislocation enough.

        Liked by 4 people

  10. Tipsy says:

    Does anyone ever get the sense that some leftist thought leaders or journolisters have decided that the next phase of the game requires really offensive, inflammatory and provocative statements from their foot soldiers like Talia “stomp them on the head” Lavin? What are they trying to achieve with that?

    Like

    • Jack Archer says:

      “leftists”… “thought leaders”… “journolisters”… I know that you know that I know that you know (((who))) we’re really talking about.

      And when you’re talking about them, you have to realize the whole enterprise is based on chutzpah. Hate is their animating principle, but chutzpah is their operating principal.

      So they push and push and push and because they get away with it, they amp it up and push some more. And they always overplay their hand because their is no end game; just moar control, moar war, moar revolution, moar, moar, moar. And the rubber band snaps.

      They never learn.

      … the Jews, who put the Lord Jesus to death, and the prophets too, and persecuted us also. Their conduct does not please God, and makes them the enemies of the whole human race
      (1Th 2:14-15 NJB)

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Paracelsus says:

    My official border control policy is GAU 19B.

    I don’t give a fuck where they ship the anchor baby and double pregnant Elsa, as long as it isn’t the U.S.

    Like

    • Amon Ra says:

      What a complete waste of bullets. This is overkill against infantry or even light vehicles. Typical ZioAmerican design: over engineered, over complicated, and over priced.

      Like

      • Ironsides says:

        From my understanding, it was designed to deliver reliable hits in an extremely brief window of firing from a fast-moving aircraft. It fires 50 to 100 rounds per second, but if the gun is only pointed directly at the target for half a second during an attack run, that means 25 to 50 rounds in its vicinity.

        That’s why aircraft mounted machine guns are set at a much higher rate of fire than the same weapon in a ground role. Increasing the chances of a hit in that split second during which it’s actually possible to hit the target. While the minigun is an American weapon, “overclocked” aircraft machine guns that dump tons of bullets downrange (just not as many tons as the minigun, obviously) are pretty much universal.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Paracelsus says:

        Overkill? Give me three of them and some Raufoss rounds.

        Like

  12. Talia Lavin.

    Phrizziognomy is rael.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Igor says:

    Woof. That face is hard to look at. I invite anyway who idealizes Ukrainian women to check out (((Lavin’s))) Twitter. If she uses this overwrought rhetoric now to refer to a nation of Jebs, what would she have left to say if people were actually being deported or put into ovens?

    Separation seems even less likely than ethnic cleansing in the US. The powers that be are (((special))), like Lavin, and would never let it happen unless they were forced to accept it through violence. They control the whole pie now. There is no incentive for them to give anything up.

    Americans are at least as conquered as the Germans after WWII. If you check out the (((special)))-proposed plans to exterminate the Germans after WWII (e.g. the Morganthau Plan), you will see what they have in store for us.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jay in DC says:

      So help me understand… one fat Ukie jewess is the face of all Ukranian women? What is your obsession with bagging on EE / Russian women? Have you been to ANY country east of Germany. Even one? If not, no offense, but you should stop talking.

      They are an order of magnitude hotter than Americunts. I cannot figure out why you are carrying water for these disgusting slobs in US/UK. My only thought is that maybe you are trapped here and perhaps stuck with them so it is fun to tear down men w/ options. Bitter bitches have lashed out for far less. It is a bad look, because lots of what you say I agree with but you have this very unnatural hang up about this that you share with your buddy PA who has some similar diagnosable issue about this.

      Like

      • PA says:

        “your buddy PA who has some similar diagnosable issue about this”

        da fuque? you all right brah?

        Like

      • Jay in DC says:

        I actually wasn’t saying that to be purposefully confrontational as I told you I don’t do the circular firing squad. It is just something that comes up very frequently here so I notice it. You have this very odd hang up about people switching countries, especially the Visegrad 4. I know nothing about how you acquired it but no one reacts that forcefully to something unless there is some history behind it.

        It is simply one of those things we will never see eye to eye on. All Europeans should be able to intermingle at will since we are facing a rather existential crisis at the moment, which I feel certain you’ve noticed.

        Like

      • PA says:

        “All Europeans should be able to intermingle”

        I vi0lently disagree with that, as a European and White patriot.

        We’re not a race, as far as that which bonds us socially and spiritually. We are nations. Even micronations. The mixing of those things weakens us.

        Like

      • PA says:

        Your point of view, Jay, is that of a deracinated White man who deals with deracinated White women and clings on to fantasies of sex tourism as a way out of this. I ca sympathize, except for the fact that places where in your fantasies you’d prey aren’t deracinated, and they don’t need you.

        Figure out who you are. Then either procreate in that world, or (if your age and circumstances aren’t amenable to such a move) help your people in other ways.

        The only thing more contemptible than a sex tourist is a Walter Mitty playing the sex tourist. I say this as a friend.

        Like

      • PA – Help me on this. There is a current hemorrhaging of men from the Baltic countries as they go to make an EU buck and spent it on hookers and drink in Spain. There is a veritable nation of trad wombs sitting there pining for the very kind of men that populate this blog. Should those women be denied the opportunity to raise a tassel of Crusaders and age into spinsters simply because you don’t want micronations intermingling? Should virile hard-souled American men lie in incel-itude until their last grand-niece mudsharks just to satisfy this requirement? Or do we match supply up with demand and forge traditional Euro-Christian families across the beseiged nations of the West? Your call.

        Like

      • PA says:

        NeoChronopolis: stop masturbating.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        so micronations will defend themselves against muzzies and jews on one side and chinese and other asians on the other
        what a delusion
        if whites as race and civilization are to survive they have act together and have to put the belonging to white race and civilization before their nations and anymosites centuries old
        there is a wide spread delusion throughout eastern europe that they will be able to survive once america and western europe fallen
        western civilization and Whites have never faced the greater threat in their history sandwiched between muzzies and chinese while facing the (((archetypal enemy))) yet you are advocating “micronations” jeez
        learn what “fascio” in italian means if you already do not know

        Like

      • Igor says:

        You confuse me with someone else. Don’t think I ever mentioned EE women here before.

        Like

      • PA says:

        Cortesar is a riot. One moment he derides Trump as the jews’ golem and the next moment he tells his fantasy pr0n Latvian girls that Trump will save them from that, which their men had dealt with just fine for over the past 1000 years.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        Your point of view, Jay, is that of a deracinated White man who deals with deracinated White women and clings on to fantasies of sex tourism as a way out of this. I ca sympathize, except for the fact that places where in your fantasies you’d prey aren’t deracinated, and they don’t need you
        ————————————————————————————————–
        utterly disingenuous
        I do not think that he for once mentioned the sex tourism
        Nor did he mean it
        I have already asked you once
        How can you as a polish immigrant into usa that accepted you and your family in the time of need so vehemently oppose to the immigrating the other way if need be and keep the straight face?

        Like

      • PA says:

        “How can you as a polish immigrant into usa that accepted you and your family in the time of need so vehemently oppose to the immigrating the other way if need be and keep the straight face?”

        Two wrongs do not make a right.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        Cortesar is a riot. One moment he derides Trump as the jews’ golem and the next moment he tells his fantasy pr0n Latvian girls that Trump will save them from that, which their men had dealt with just fine for over the past 1000 years
        ————————————————————————————————
        disingenuous prick I never said that trump will save anything let alone latvian girls (unlike you)
        what to say about “latvian fantasy porn girl” that is your level of of discussion that you so proud of
        finally if escaped you somehow this age age is much different than past 1000 years, much different
        for those 1000 years we ruled the world and avery single of major european countries was more powerful than the rest of it combined

        Like

      • PA says:

        gunsIingergregi is easier to read than that last comment of yours, and I tried to read it for content.

        Like

      • INDY says:

        cortesar are you sicilian? you type like a darkie

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        yes I am a sicilian mother*fucker
        what are you going to do now

        Like

      • INDY says:

        Lolol

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        PA—not hereby opining on you personally, but on the general question:

        Two wrongs do not make a right.

        I don’t think that it is always wrong for a White to immigrate to between White nations. Just that (1) it should require a deep cultural commitment,[1] not just American-style “immigration” paperwork or “economic” reasons; (2) for better or for worse, there are distinctions between White genetic stocks that should not be diluted (see also Madison Grant); and, (3) no sane nation ever invites another’s “wretched refuse”!

        E.g., Houston Stewart Chamberlain, Frau Winifred Wagner, and William Joyce all made excellent German citizens. And I get the idea that present company includes some American expats who are now excellent, quite nationalistic-minded Europeans of some sort.

        [1. Need I mention, desiring women “an order of magnitude hotter than Americunts” does not in itself qualify as a “deep cultural commitment”.]

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        NeoChronopolis:

        There is [allegedly] a current hemorrhaging of men from the Baltic countries… [ooh, Baltic wombs!] Should virile hard-souled American men lie in incel-itude

        Assuming your premises arguendo, Baltic girls would do much better to take up polyǵamy than to invite in American incels. (Your word.)

        That “hard-souled… incel” stuff sounds like a right-wing version of hippie talk. Deep, man. Sorry you aren’t on the same wavelength as those Baltic wombs.

        [Note: My last post above was a bit oversimplified, but perhaps the best I could summarize without a mini-essay at least thrice the length. It should be taken in the context of other things I’ve said here, and other things I’ve previously tried to say that got stuck in M-d’s limbo in various threads.]

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        yes I am a sicilian mother*fucker
        what are you going to do now

        That explains your deep cynicism then. I forgive you. I was never sure where you come from. This explains a great deal about you.

        Like

    • Igor says:

      Mod ate my reply

      Liked by 2 people

    • Khazar Jews have as much in common in the looks department with Ukrainian women as Bengali untouchable imports to Londonistan have with Emma Watson.

      Like

    • Igor says:

      Cortesar’s comments can be summarized as “give me your tired, your poor your huddled masses…as long as they’re white” and “white genocide is awesome (if perpetrated by whites)”. I commented on this a few posts ago. You have got plenty of people who claim to be on the right but support open borders, mass migration, assimilation, homogenization, nationalism=war, and every other leftist belief. The sound like the most militant of the (((special))) except they add the qualifier that obliterating Western nations is only good if done by other Westerners.

      Liked by 2 people

      • cortesar says:

        white” and “white genocide is awesome (if perpetrated by whites)”.
        I commented on this a few posts ago
        ———————————————————————————————–
        White genocide perpetrated by whites lolz I know that you did comment that is why jay was right about both of you
        For the rest I think I explained it above
        it is a question of survival, no single white nation alone will be able to survive the formidable enemies we are facing
        One really has to be utterly delusional to believe contrary

        It is always difficult to predict future but from the vantage point of today it looks like whites will have move and re-group if they want to survive as a relative large cohesive groupe
        In next 50 years it is very likely that both usa and western europe will be fallen
        A portion of the white population will stay in these mongrel domains while the other will move and regroup
        In north america these whites will move towards the north while europeans will move towards the east and russia
        In a cold climate faced with daily struggle the nature will reassert itself and in a few hundred years we will rule the world again
        For that reason it is essential that idea of the common white struggle takes over the minds of whites everywhere
        Needles to say that you and pa are the obstacles to this fundamental step of the survival strategy
        One may hope that this will not happen that the new Ceaser will appear and cross Rubicon yet man always needs to be realist in the face of such enormous an adversity

        Like

      • PA says:

        “will be able to survive the formidable enemies we are facing”

        The other perspective: US gov directly and indirectly keeps all Western nations in a state of paralysis, and from time to time it shows small nations like Serbia that it may not police its alien filth.

        But once Pax America is gone, Whites in Europe and North America regrouping along linguistic, cultural, and ethnic lines will be a snap and non-European threats will no longer loom like the existential danger they were played up to be.

        Liked by 1 person

      • cortesar says:

        Do you believe that us government keep sweden in the state of paralysis?

        Like

      • Igor says:

        Cortesar must be American or a migrant there. Seems to have no idea what a nation is. Who cares if Italy is 99% Italian or 50% Polish. They are both white so no big diff. We just need to be good (((consumers))) and forget about ancestry and culture nonsense. And I guess he misses the fact that his dream is basically the EU and every positive is being accomplished by nationalists.

        Liked by 1 person

      • PA says:

        You are forgetting that 15 years ago, the government of Sweden was pushing hard against GWB’s Iraq Attaq explicitly because they feared the resulting refugee wave.

        What that happened in Sweden between then and now is the direct and indirect result of US Gov meddling in their affairs. Swedes are not natural dodos. They are normal people with a few Nordic quirks who found themselves subverted from without and that’s where they are now.

        Liked by 1 person

      • cortesar says:

        hehe but we just established that I am a sicilian
        what are you an idiot?
        That kind of nationalism that you are advocating is no longer possible
        It is not a question if italy will be 50 per cent polish but how long is going to take before it is 51 percent muzzie run by chinese merchants and jews
        Your inability to understand where the threat is, what is an ideal world vs what is the one in which we as a group will survive and eventually dominate clearly shows your inability to think

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        I am the last one who is going to defend american imperialism and necohen wars yet I assure you that the potential war refugees was not the reason why sweden opposed the war
        Indirectly yes sweeds are victims of these wars but the virus of self destruction runs much deeper
        As for cultural destruction If you by american government mean barbara spectre then yes
        If tomorrow the necohen empire is to collapse they will continue to be lunatic leftoids as they are today
        It is only the struggle and new generations that will change the lunatic state of their minds
        But first they need to survive in a relatively large numbers which brings me back to the beginning of the discussion

        Like

      • PA says:

        The beginning of the discussion is that Moar Mixing is not the way forward. That just further weakens identity, loyalty, sense of purpose, willingness to sacrifice. Hey, let’s all just speak English — er – Esperanto!

        No White man will die for the White race. He’ll sooner make a separate deal with chinks. But he will run into hell and back for his nation.

        No, the way forward is purification mode. As to safety in numbers, European people are capable of forming alliances like we did in 1683.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        Americans do not get it. Historically, Europe has always been a world of its own. Within that world, people often travelled, or sometimes even immigrated; but they mostly kept to their own cultures, their own languages, their own traditions. These divisions had deep, real-world historical origins, and organically developed into modern ideas of nationality. European nations are as alike as different, and as different as alike.

        (It took me many years, many books, some travel, and some European friends to understand this.)

        Every rational pan-European idea has built on nationality as a foundation. Dissolving nationality would destroy the foundation. I observe this as an ideological pan-Europeanist (but definitely not of the (((“Pan-European Union”))) variety).

        Only a denationalized, deracinated American could conceive the hollow idea of “White Nationalism”. I wrote some long essay about this recently…

        (P.S., WTF!? My (((web-browser)))’s spell-checker puts a squiggly red line under “deracinated “, but not “denationalized”. Adjacent, the words look suitable for a meme graphic. Thanks, Jews!)

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        what it was is not the discussion but what is going to be
        european nationalism which you tend to glorify having only second knowledge of it is one of the major reason why europeans killed themselves in 2 european civil wars of 20th century (and many others before) putting an end on our domination of the world
        Frenezy with which all european nations went to kill each other in 1914 is one of the greatest indictment of that nationalism
        When you say nationalism you see the the culture and traditions, music but you do not see the other side of it which so many times ended by brother killing brother
        If europeans are not able to understand the common struggle and above the common destiny in the years to come they will perish
        Call it white nationalism pan-europeanism or whatever

        Like

      • PA says:

        “Frenezy with which all european nations went to kill each other in 1914 is one of the greatest indictment of that nationalism”

        So woefully uninformed. Have you heard about the Christmas Truce, when English and German soldiers came out of the trenches to wish each other happy Christmas and then and played soccer? England’s high command, which was beholden to You Know Who, eventually ordered such fraternization to stop.

        It was not European nations that drove the killing, it was imperial ambitions of bankers and puppet-Wilson.

        Tito tried to unite nations by force, under a fake creed. Serbs, Croats, Slovenes speak almost identical languages and it didnt work.

        Stop being an uninformed utopian.

        Like

      • PA says:

        “Frenezy with which all european nations went to kill each other in 1914 is one of the greatest indictment of that nationalism”

        So woefully uninformed. Have you heard about the Christmas Truce, when English and German soldiers came out of the trenches to wish each other happy Christmas and then and played soccer? England’s high command, which was beholden to You Know Who, eventually ordered such fraternization to stop.

        It was not European nations that drove the killing, it was imperial ambitions of bankers and puppet-Wilson.

        Tito tried to unite nations by force, under a fake creed. Serbs, Croats, Slovenes speak almost identical languages and it didnt work.

        Stop being an uninformed utopian.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        Really
        Do the research about yuge demonstrations of joy at the proclamation of war in almost every of european capitals
        Read “Au dessous de la melee” by romand rolland
        Read celine

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        Like

      • Igor says:

        My mistake. Cortesar is totally pro-white. He just wants a pan-European government to direct a migration policy that obliterates the Western nations. Because the whites are violent and they’ll cause wars if they’re allowed to have nations (the world wars were mainly between mutlinational empires but that is a minor detail). And if you disagree you lack compassion because we should help immigrants. I guess Mark Potok posts here.

        Liked by 1 person

      • PA says:

        So this is what it comes down to: cortesar wants to destroy European nations to save them. He’s Angela Merkel.

        Meanwhile, Jay wants the same thing, but for him it’s all about sex tourism fantasies.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Aristarchus says:

        Damn it, two of my posts here are sinful in the sight of M-d. (It takes me awhile to write and post those…)

        This is an important subject. PA, thank you for saying something sensible to cortesar—and for bringing up the Christmas Truce. I have much else to say (and much harder), but cannot (yet) get it through.

        puppet-Wilson

        A pliant tool in the hands of “Colonel” House and (((Jacob Schiff))). What kind of pśychotic prates about a “waaaar to end waaaars” and to “make the world safe for democrishy”!?

        cortesar, your “muh America great, stupid Europeans kill each other” is pure Jewish-American agitprop. To be clear, I’m not accusing you of ((())): I’m saying that you need another “redpill”.

        The way you’re talking, it sounds like you may be up for more righteous American do-gooding. Save those Europeans from their damnfool selves by invading them again, just like the last two times!

        If the Germans rise up against their régime, and Trump makes a speech about “piece keeping” and “maintaining globohomo stability [for the (((holy stock market)))]”, are you onboard with that? (WTF do you think is propping up Merkel and her mud-army!?)

        (Will try again.)

        [P.S., I kindly request that you punctuate your sentences legibly. It is difficult to read what you write. Thank you.]

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        PA, our posts hit the wire the same minute—and you hit Merkel square, as I’ve been trying to for about the past hour! (I hit harder, on American puppet Merkel.) If you keep forcing me to smile like that, perhaps we may even someday achieve between us a 25-year Non-Aggression Pact (as even Josef Beck was reported to have been considering in February of 1939, before the Anglo-Jewish warmongers kicked up their agitation).

        Liked by 1 person

      • Aristarchus says:

        cortesar, you asked if America was keeping Sweden “in the state of paralysis”. PA gave you a decent answer. Starting from over an hour ago, I now have a multiple posts piled up in M-d’s limbo asking you in detail a question that I managed to latch onto my post that made it through: “WTF do you think is propping up Merkel and her mud-army!?”

        I oftentimes see American idiots on the Internet who sneer about “German cûcks”. They are too fantastically ignorant to even realize that Germany is still an occupied country in a legal state of war with its occupier. The old occupying army is protecting the newly imported occupying army. And President Kushner’s Trump-shaped ventriloquist’s dummy is a suitable wartime mouthpiece for stopping any troublemaking by those blond beasts, should they decide to rebel. Indeed, I believe that that was one of several principal reasons why he was (((s-elected)))—just in case those Germans were to get uppity. The pantsuited dyke couldn’t pull it off.

        In hopes of making it through m0d this time, I hereby omit a few little details that will make any rational man raḑically shift toward my position.

        …now, what was it you were saying about those awfully nationalistic Europeans being such brother-killers? Observe that Germany is the strategically central, million-mud epicenter of a multi-pronged invasion designed to destroy all of Europe.

        Like

  14. “And guess who has all the guns…”

    Which is precisely why the eskimos are pushing so hard to take them in all white countries.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. JOSEPH ANGEL says:

    Nother crazed jewess. Will be a juicy target for The New Holocaust.

    Like

    • Aristarchus says:

      “New” Holocaust? We need one now, only because there wasn’t an old one.

      The Taļmud, however, records the history of how the Romans slew four hundred million Jews. (Maybe four billion; the text is ambiguous.) The holy Jewish blood rose in a flood as high as the nostrils of the Romans’ horses, and gushed out to sea—carrying with it large boulders, and staining the sea red for four miles from shore.

      Perhaps you were referring to that Holocaust?

      (Due to their negroid blood, Jews are so pşychotically supersţitious that they are capable of believing anything. But when the Jews manufacture a story for goyim, they try to keep it at least almost approximately plausible. 1940s death-counts for the Nazi German ḿurḑerers varied as high as 40 million, and finally settled on a number with some backing theology and a history of Jewish claims: Six Million.)

      Like

  16. DaDZ says:

    CH: I think anyone on our side who expects the sympathy or support of the United States military is in for a rude fucking awakening. I got out 14 years ago, but even back then, the armed forces were cucked six ways to Sunday. Over the course of 12 years on active duty, I watched as more and more company and higher level commanders breathlessly scrambled to prove how committed to diversity and equality they were. It worked. The military is just a massive front organization for a nigger/spic welfare scheme.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Jay in DC says:

      Thanks for saying this, I was about to post the same thing you saved me some time. There is this bizarre notion that the military are some sort of ‘honorable’ force for ‘freedom’ instead of mercenaries working for j00 paymasters.

      The media will properly demonize anyone on ‘our side’ should any rumblings about CW2 begin. The same propaganda you see right now will be dialed up to 11 and so the military will engage in righteous warfare against the dangerous domestic terrorists blah blah, etc etc. This whole ‘it will be over in a week’ is a civnat fap fantasy.

      The military will want their paychecks and pensions and act accordingly as well as DHS and local LEOs as well. These people give approximately zero fucks about your ‘muh heritage’ and ‘muh constitution’. YOU are the ‘enemy domestic’ they take an oath against and they will gladly light your ass up in a hot minute.

      Liked by 1 person

      • map says:

        You are severely mistaken about how this plays out. In a Civil War, the military will fracture as people desert to protect their families.

        Or, how is it going to work? Order the troops with family in Kentucky to attack Texas, while the troops with family in Texas attack Kentucky? Not likely.

        If the war becomes a true civil war (a war where parties try to control a single central government) then the organization breaks down completely. Logistics break down completely. Not only will you have desertion, but complex crew-based weapon systems also break down. The military will splinter along racial lines like everyone else.

        Like

      • snarkwolf says:

        Unfortunately, I find this likely. Not because of political sympathies, but because of money. “Think about your pension until the shame goes away”. It can be observed right now in civilian LEOs. Not sure how the military will act.

        Like

      • snarkwolf says:

        @map
        “Or, how is it going to work? Order the troops with family in Kentucky to attack Texas, while the troops with family in Texas attack Kentucky? Not likely.”

        Tough call. The main impediment to this happening is that in the US (unlike e.g. the UK), the geographical “homes” of soldiers are mixed. Even a humble platoon can have soldiers from all over the country.

        But maybe the military will be smart enough to restructure. Hard to tell.

        Like

      • Passerby says:

        Map

        Where is that civil war, you poor cuck? You became a minority in California, and what did you do? Nothing.

        Not only that, but US whites, after becoming minority in Cali, continue to vote left.

        Isn’t that what you muricans say “As California goes, so goes the nation”?

        Well, look at your new laws in California and prepare to take it up your arse like the loser you are.

        http://menslaws.com/slew-of-new-california-metoo-sexual-harassment-laws-go-into-effect-in-2019-eliminates-confidentiality-and-ability-to-defend-lawsuits-creates-blacklists-even-false-allegations-are-not-defamatory/

        Liked by 1 person

    • “I watched as more and more company and higher level commanders breathlessly scrambled to prove how committed to diversity and equality they were.”

      True. I saw the same thing.

      But I also saw high level commanders breathlessly scramble to answer the hard questions that low level enlisted men weren’t afraid to ask. For example, “if women aren’t expected to perform at the same physical level as men, how can I expect them to pull my wounded body out of a bad situation?”

      I saw the young men’s reaction to the commander’s prevarication. Nobody liked the direction the military was (is) heading. There’s nothing that makes me think the military is immune to the same (((progressive))) forces that are dividing America along racial lines.

      I think that young servicemen (and police officers) realize soon after joining that the military (or the force) are just a means to a paycheck. I think the loyalty is tenuous, and when Uncle Sam’s barrel is pointed toward one’s racial kin, the tenuousness of that loyalty will be brought into relief. But maybe I’m wrong.

      Like

      • DaDZ says:

        PK, True, I observed the same thing WRT soldiers asking the tough questions. It was usually during a mandatory “sensing session” or some such nonsense, which was really nothing more than a diversity mini-camp designed to condition the minds of easily influenced young men.

        Those same officers (usually COs or field grades) who put their prevarications on display were the young lieutenants, who 5 to 10 years earlier, were asking the same questions as those soldiers.

        I think that it is a mistake to believe that the “based military or police” are going to join in the fight with us. As a previous commenter said, their loyalty will be to their paychecks, pensions, and post-separation benefits (VA loan, GI Bill, and of course, monthly disability payments). Combine all that with the threat of prison, as well as the rapidly shifting demographic of the U.S. military, and I think it becomes clear which side they’ll choose.

        As far as them splintering off to protect their families (I know that wasn’t one of your assertions, but someone mentioned it). Again, not likely. This is an eventuality the brass will plan for accordingly. Families will be temporarily housed on the installations and there will plenty of space for them with the majority of the personnel deployed. A large post, like Ft Hood for example, will have tens of thousands of barracks beds available. When those are filled, there’s hangars, motor pools, gymnasiums, etc.

        The people in charge will make sure to provide every possible inducement and deterrent available to ensure their loyalty.

        Like

    • Passerby says:

      The military is now promoting the feminist Captain Marvel. Nuff said.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        That just makes the job easier. Have you ever served with female soldiers? WRT to moving units from Kentucky to Texas, that makes the families more vulnerable and would contribute to a break down in morale and desertions.

        Like

      • Passerby says:

        I served in my countires army (as a conscript), but we did not take female soldiers back then. I have seen statistical data on female soldiers in the West though, and they are significantly worse than male soldiers. In various, at least dozen important areas.

        No point in having most of them if you have enough male soldiers.

        Like

  17. Rest assured that Talia “I wish I was a cute white girl but instead I was born a fat, ugly Jewess” Lavin secretly lusts for the white men she claims to despise.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. KaD says:

    JackD is living with the common illusion that the Civil War was fought over slavery. This is not true. Slavery was a part of it but not the greater part. The main battle was fought to prevent the South from succeeding from the Union of the United States, which it had every right to do. http://southernheritage411.com/truehistory.php?th=031

    Liked by 1 person

    • snarkwolf says:

      Well, yes. And seceding. But it is much deeper than that. WHY did the South want to secede? Not because of wanting to maintain slavery, which was not an issue at this point.
      The real reason is, as noted elsewhere, that the North was rapidly industrializing, whereas the South was agrarian, especially cash crops like cotton (of course) tobacco and similar.
      BUT the South, despite all the slaves, wanted machinery for agriculture.
      Not tractors yet, not invented yet, but other stuff.
      AND they were offered a choice of machinery built in the North, OR better and more priceworthy machinery from the UK (of GB and Ireland). But the federation, mostly run by Northeners, imposed heavy customs duties. (Remember, there was no federal income tax – hard to impose at time -, instead customs duties and whiskey taxes the latter also hard to impose).
      So the Southerners figured, correctly, that they would do better as a separate entity and the crops were valuable enough that they could be sold to UK/Europe. So they decided to do without the North.
      This, obviously, caused massive loss of revenue for the North. And to add insult to injury, even merchandise headed for the North, both machinery and various more-or-less luxury goods, could be shipped mostly duty free from Europe to the South. And then also sent overland to the North, crossing a long unprotected border. Quelle horreur! We can’t have that, said the élite.

      After a year or two of fighting without much progress for either side, the appetite for war started to wane in the North. The farmers – the majority – had little benefit from the feds, and pretty much wanted to quit. So to fire up the willingness to war, slavery was brought in as a propaganda measure.
      “Uncle Tom’s Cabin” was dusted off and sold in mass editions. Etc.

      Like

  19. Anonymous says:

    Just sayin’.

    Like

  20. Publius says:

    Lolz thot judge knows she is out of her league, defensive, insecure, and PMSing to boot.

    Female judges. Good one. Lolz.

    Like

  21. Aristarchus says:

    Talia Lavin: [blah, blah, blah] …torment minorities… sheer cruel parsimony [extra blah] to strip away healthcare from [BLAH] the afflicted and to [blah] comfort the wealthy… [blah, BLAH, blah] …might as well be an ICE agent ripping an 18-month-old child from its mother’s arms… [BLAH]

    This is why I am proud to lack for (((“empathy”))) (= ‘muh feelz’).

    I am completely immune to these liberal-Jewish guilt-trips, and I detest anybody who can be susceptible to them.

    I also wouldn’t shed a tear over the results of, say, cutting “foreign aid” to Africa cold-turkey, and simultaneously banning missionaries, “philanthropists”, and other do-gooding creeps from feeding the niggers. Anyway, niggers only see pathologically altrustic White “generosity” as a sign of contemptible weakness to be used and abused; and on this point, the niggers have superior intelligence to almost all Whites.

    To which I say: tough nuts, sugar. When they go low, stomp them on the head.

    I am also unafraid of the characteristic liberal bloodthirstiness that they veil beneath their saccharine, hypocritical sentimentality (‘muh feelz’). Liberals are haters first; they don’t know how to love, all their hippie group-hug pretenses notwithstanding. My hatred is driven by love, and is therefore incomparably more powerful.

    From AnotherDad: […] It’s precisely the fact that generations of white guys—my ancestors—have built up such a rich prosperous nation, that…

    …they are PRIVILEGED.

    Privilege is the inheritance of those whose ancestors had a high genetic potential, and actively rose to that potential in their achievements. Families whose forebears excelled inherit class and wealth. Great races collectively inherit their forebears’ civilizations.

    Own your privilege.

    Liked by 1 person

  22. snarkwolf says:

    There was a time of yore when “getting satisfaction” was an open
    and honorable request.

    Mainly to get the opportunity to poke the other guy’s heart out with a foil,
    or shooting him, in a duel.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. -B- says:

    This is the same as MGTOW philosophy. Which in words of Lord Humongous is “Just walk away”. And it’s feared by the left for the same reason, it’s the productive simply denying the parasitical their productivity.

    Another thing I learned about the left, they will babble endlessly about universal basic income and how is for people to follow their economically non-viable passions. But if a productive tax paying white male says he’ll quit working, take UBI, and follow his passions they will not like that and start using feminist style shaming language. They expect others to keep working.

    Ultimately leftists understand where the wealth comes from, where the standard of living comes from. They also know that if there is separation, if the productive white males they hate separate or are cast out, all the other productive people will follow. They won’t stick around. It will leave the leftist utopia with nothing but people fighting over a dwindling pile of resources and supplies.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. #muellerinvestigation #trump #trumprussia #maga

    A post shared by Jay Stang (@stg58_animal_mother) on

    Like

  25. LeShitlourde says:

    I also viewed immigration like this.

    It’s great that shitlibs want to import a bunch of foreigners to make themselves feel special. But I don’t, and yet somehow I always have to deal with the repercussions of their experiment.

    And if you try to move? Doesn’t work, they follow us mindlessly, leaving a trail of desolation in the rear-view mirror, with not an inclination in the world that their attitudes are what destroyed their bluetropolis.

    No shitlib in history has ever contemplated leaving the west to enjoy diversity. Not one, except for the super rich. They would never move to Nigeria, etc. But somehow they rationalize that the state of the other countries is somehow, inexplicably totally unrelated to the people living there.

    Like

  26. irishsavant says:

    “New York University has hired Talia Lavin as an adjunct journalism professor less than a year after the former New Yorker fact checker resigned after falsely accusing an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent of having a Nazi tattoo.”

    A glittering career in ‘journalism’ clearly lies before this creature.

    Like

  27. TLM says:

    So the Mueller probe was actually all about giving Team Circumcision time to convert Trump from Nationalist to Hebrew First. Appears to be a yuge success. I know back in 2016 I just couldn’t stop yearning in my heart for the Golan heights to be officially declared a part of Israel.

    Like

  28. “you are espousing a partition and civil war. Did not go that well the last time.”

    Error in assumption: which side in the Civil War was importing and breeding incompatible third-worlders hand over fist?

    Contra JackD, while all the dead white men were a great tragedy, the War successfully contained the Negro problem in the Southeast. The AnotherDad side won. They preserved their race, culture and nation. They halted the expansion of the slave-fueled plantation state.

    The race problem stayed contained and relatively well managed in the Southeast until the formerly secessionist (((Democrats))) used the welfare state and fake “civil rights” to subsidize and to expand the Negro problem, to import third world reinforcements, and to build a new serf-fueled plantation state.

    The new Civil War will now be refought for essentially the same reason as the last one: regular Americans don’t want to compete with—or worse, to be—serfs and slaves. Except this time the battle lines will urban and personal, and the rules will be irregular and undeclared. In fact, they already are.

    Like

Leave a Reply