73 Responses to “The Four Viragos”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Donate
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
I would vote for him before Vance or whatever anti-white golem the Dems nominate. Not saying Hunter Biden will be Hitler Biden, but the sheer lunacy of a President Crackpipe could widen the fissures in Weimarica, and pave the way for a third (reich) party.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
If Hitler (pbuh) came back to Germany today, he would weep bitter tears first, and then he would reconstitute the Third Reich, but instead of conquering Globobolshevism, he'd direct the full might of the German Wotanic spirit against the traitors within Germany.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
It's a pathology at this point. It should be an affliction with a DSM-V designation.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Thais are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Vietnamese are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Somalis are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Haitians are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Indians are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Hondurans are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.Then one day, you'll look out across your town square, and blond-haired children will be 1% of your local community.
And that will be a big deal.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Better idea: Import the recipes, leave the Thais home.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
"Bonnie Pierce had already escaped her burning Minnesota home when she realized her toddler was still trapped inside. She turned around and RAN BACK INTO THE FIRE for her little girl.
When firefighters reached them, Bonnie was unconscious with her body wrapped around Grace, shielding her daughter from the flames and smoke."
Her daughter survived.
This is how a healthy society should revere motherhood. It recognizes true maternal heroism and carries along the lesson to each generation, as part of its sustaining mythos, that mothers will sacrifice everything for their children.
An evil society gathers its flock along roadsides, to toss roses and weepy tributes to a mother accused of murdering her three children.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
There is a kernel of truth in this meme, which is why it resonates. But as with all memes, full truth often is not so easily encapsulated.
Women have some moral and actionable agency. They make personal decisions based on innate desires, just like men do, except framed by their female nature.
Women's poor life decisions and political insanities are not entirely the fault of jewish agitprop. Their liberation, a predictable consequence of late stage empire trajectories, removes patriarchal guardrails that had channeled female hypergamy away from reckless manifestations. "Feminism" becomes the easy choice for modren men whose own manly virtues have fled them.
But, women by nature are also consensus seekers, and like a dog without a pack leader, feel unmoored and anxious when there is no social consensus for them to follow and mimic. Women become "bitey" under those conditions, and unloveable. This reality of female nature makes it possible for malignant outsiders, like the jews, to manipulate female consensus-seeking by substituting the organic consensus of White male society with the alien consensus of subversive jewish values.
Once the new consensus is established in the void of the surrendered traditional consensus, women flock (heh) to it, even if it is harmful to them over the long run.
What I am getting at here is that the correct lens through which to analyze the behavior of modren White women is one that recognizes their agency and the share of blame they must incur for their bad choices and even worse politics, while also recognizing the imposition of a foreign virus that has hijacked the emotional needs of our women to direct its expression to foul ends.
The inevitable decay of empire virtues coupled with the inevitable subversion of jewish influence is a force multiplier of White female lunacy and race treason.
In practical terms, what this means is that White men face a choice: place all blame on their women, no blame on their women, or a mix of blame and leniency.
The All Blame option leaves jewish agitprop in place, an intolerable compromise.
The No Blame option requires the complete disenfranchisement of women from politics and much of the consensus-shaping culture. Effectively, women will be treated like children with limited rights and limited accountabilty.
The Blame and Leniency option removes jewish agitprop while simultaneously shaming women away from self-destructive politics, race betrayal, and personal behaviors that cheapen their value to White men.
This is why I have maintained all along that the WQ and the JQ are at once inseparable yet unique enough in their attributes to come under separate scrutiny.
White knightoids for some low-T reason are butthurt about this fundamental truth.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Protestantism is the child of Hajnalism. When Whites of Northwest Europe became more individualistic and "bootstrappy", it inevitably followed that those same Whites would chafe at a universalizing religious authority and strike out on their own.
It's somewhat comical to consider the irony of the Catholic Church's ban on cousin marriage, which set in motion the genetic selection for more individualistic Whites, was the very seed which grew into the dominant schism that fractured the Church.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
When White racial rightists were a nonthreatening circus sideshow, establishment conservatives of the jewniparty felt comfortable winking and nodding at their grievances.
Now that White racial rightists are drawing immense interest and gathering followers by the millions and becoming a major threat to the jewniparty, establishment conservatives have frantically pivoted to dowsing the fire of White rage in the hope of quashing the only real solution to the problems that these cuckservatives pretended to care about.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Most people don’t know that Frank Sinatra has an arrest record and a mugshot to match. The reason for his arrest may be even more surprising. The official charge? Seduction.
This seemingly archaic charge was generally applied when a man convinced an unmarried woman of good repute to engage in an inappropriate encounter with him. There was generally a promise of marriage that was never actually forthcoming, thereby ruining her reputation.
In 1938, a 23-year-old Sinatra found himself in just such a situation, and he was officially arrested and booked for Seduction. The charge was eventually dropped when it was discovered that the supposedly single woman was in fact married. Later that year, armed with this new information, the original charge was revised slightly, and Sinatra was again arrested, this time for Adultery.
https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/celebrity-mugshots/frank-sinatra/
It's interesting that at a time when the patriarchy that feminists decry ruled America, a man could be arrested for "Seduction" or Adultery.
Now, in the ashes of the patriarchy and in the full flower of the gynarchy with its contraception and abortion handmaidens, a man can pump and dump his way through a small army of feminists with nary a disruption to his hedonistic lifestyle.
-
-
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
-
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
PAGES
Recent Comments
- markgm28 on Ministry Of Twatter
- Augustus on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
- r1verboatgambler on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
- Ironsides on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
- r1verboatgambler on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s PlaceSYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-

“Where’s the DIVERSITY?”
LikeLiked by 1 person
Vagina Diversity!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I was riffin’ the Wendy’s commercial .. “Where’s the BEEF?”
To which there’s plenty of “beef and cheddar in a catchers mit!” in that pic.
(4 socialist wimminz is not diversity .. that’s a herd.)
LikeLike
Heifers of the Apocalypse
LikeLiked by 2 people
Are you kidding me? I see 0 white males. That’s 100% diversity.
LikeLike
You need to calm down .. lol
LikeLike
who bitch doze is?
LikeLike
Massa mosby regrets nuffin
LikeLike
I didn’t put any of those crones in office you hapless inbred fuckwit.
LikeLike
no, your kind only took care to dispatch the (retrograde? passé? inbred?) monarchies.
the rest took care of itself
LikeLike
‘you hapless inbred fuckwit’
I’m stealing that.
LikeLike
Are these new entries to the most-punchable face contest?
LikeLiked by 2 people
The four horsemen of the apocalypse
LikeLike
Whoresmyn of the Apocalypse.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Whoresman?
LikeLiked by 1 person
ha ha
LikeLike
The four horsefaces of Apocalypse.
LikeLiked by 7 people
That’s Futanari gold right there.
LikeLike
Each with 14 inches of Coke can thick throbbing clitmeat waiting to break open newly minted cuck vaginoplasty before detaching the gimp skull and vacuum sucking the entirety of its gray matter harder than a fat Catholic girl taking semen after a fast.
LikeLike
((you)) had to shit on papists, did ((you))?
LikeLike
The Southern Irish just voted by a 2/3rds majority to legalize ch!ld murd3r. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/may/26/ireland-votes-by-landslide-to-legalise-abortion
LikeLike
((you)) had to shit on papists, did ((you))?
I’ve jizzed on a few, I must confess.
LikeLike
There’s 4 of them. Only 3 are needed for Macbeth. We’ll take #1, 3, and 4. Save #2 for the part of Yorick in Hamlet.
LikeLike
Is this a game of “Kill, Kill, Kill. and Kill”?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Is this a game of, “Hey, Mr Fed, why don’t you subpoena our IP addresses for threat3ning the l!fe of a member of the U.S. C0ngress or the U.S. Sen@te?”
LikeLike
These are all M in the FMK game, the K going to the moribund gimp sentenced to matrimony.
LikeLike
These are all apex mantis women, after all.
LikeLike
2 Chosenites, Asian, and a half-frican …….priceless
LikeLike
Note how short Comma-law* actually is. All media shots of her make her look statuesque.
*Yes, that’s how she pronounces it.
LikeLike
“Commie, commie, commie, commie, commie Commie Kamala-eon. She come and go…she come and go.”
LikeLike
Somalia Harris
LikeLike
And they are all four doing the folded-arms thing. Looking as strong independent and hostile as possible.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Most behaviorologists will tell you that arms folded is a defensive posture.
LikeLike
Reminds me how Demi Moore insisted she pronounced her name “DEM-i” and not “de-MI”.
Or how Cate Blanchett insisted on a dumb way to pronounce her last name (blan-CHETT instead of the normal BLAN-chett).
Such women are so power hungry they try to change what words you can say, how you can pronounce them, and what they mean.
Oh Lord, it makes me long for the cleansing fire.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I don’t care how cate wants her name said I love to bang her
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cool story. Have fun with that over-the-hill chick.
LikeLike
No, she pronounces it Com-la
LikeLike
The Purple People Eaters
Srsly wasn’t purple the color for the Color Revolution planned for the USA?
So 2015 girl.
LikeLike
To the tune of the tv show Facts of Life:
You take a Jew you take a Jap you take a duke you take a black, and there you have a Sen ah tour, a senator.
LikeLike
Diane Feinstein propounded false rape charges.
The Asian one told all men who dared question Dr.Fraud to “sit down and shut up”.
Violence against women never seemed so right.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Equal Rights and Lefts.
LikeLiked by 1 person
30% of white men still vote for this bullshit usurpation.
One thing the blacks get right is racial bloc voting.
We gotta get White Men off this suicide pact with the Dems.
LikeLiked by 1 person
10% Blue collar union members and 20% trustafarian fucks.
LikeLike
Christ, imagine if whites had even a fraction of the tribal instincts of blacks
LikeLiked by 1 person
It actually shouldn’t be hard to KO Harris if you’re Trump with a little digging, since she’s a former prosecutor.
As a former DA and a prosecutor before that, and a Democat political animal, it’s certain Harris covered up or destroyed evidence she was suppose to turn over to the defendant (it’s called Brady material, for you legal nerds). By doing so, prosecutors win more convictions.
Most DA’s engage in this behavior, but are rarely caught, for a combination of reasons: 1) most defense counsel either don’t have the funds/temerity to fight them; (2) most of the judges are former prosecutors and have a knee-jerk trust in them, or did the same corruption themselves, and so don’t allow investigations; (3) most legal services organizations are either ((very chummy)) with the DAs offices or, if not, they’re underfunded; (4) the defendants are unsympathetic thugs and creeps.
So the DAs almost never get caught. And those who are clean lose more cases (because the evidence is turned over), and thus get fewer votes/support than the DAs who “clean up the streets.”
In short, there’s too much upside and too little downside to not cover up evidence. So Harris did it. All her opponents need to do is go digging and find a few sympathetic defendants who got railroaded, and expose her as the kingpin of it. Her opponents (re:Trump) have what the defense attorneys didn’t have; money, means, temerity, time, and public pressure for openness.
Most politicians could be brought down this way (old scandal of destroying evidence when they were prosecutors), but since pols on both sides these days usually did long stints in the DAs office and/or were DAs themselves, they almost never do it because they themselves did it as well.
In short we need fewer lawyers in office, and fewer political DAs, and this is a way to do it.
LikeLike
Sounds like a butt-hurt public defender who can’t accept that most defendants are guilty just like most prosecutors are ethical. I knew Kamala as a prosecutor. I’m not defending her. She was stupid and a poor trial attorney. That is a particular case, quite distinct from your over-generalizing ad hominem. Crawl back to the NLG/ACLU cesspit you came from.
LikeLike
being a half nigger hindu street shitting snake charming rat worshipper they gave somalia harris a law degree where she couldnt pass the test to be a janitor in the law school she went to. an affirmative blaction degree
LikeLike
lmao. If you think I truck with the far-left ACLU, you’re insane. And your statements about prosecutors—who are regularly convicting whites of hate crimes, which enhance penalties—and also who seek to “balance” the racial numbers they convict–is laughable.
You’re on the side of the law because you think it protects you. If the FBI and DOJ stuff against Trump doesn’t wake you up, and hate crime nonsense doesn’t wake you up, and what happened in San Francisco to that illegal who murdered a white girl (hint: he got off)—then I don’t know what will.
The law is in the hands of the enemy, my friend. The white-hating enemy.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Weaponized Honesty, Trump, and the New Right”
LikeLike
Kunt Hairs, Frankenstein, Homo. … who’s the last shrike on the right?
LikeLike
I think that’s Amy Klobuchar, congress critter from New Somaliland , formerly known as Minnie -soda.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Somaliapolis
LikeLike
“Dykes!!!”
Because the “why” went missing.
LikeLike
There is a “why” (Y) in “Dykes” as well as in “Yikes.” Your joke appears to make some sense if spoken, but not when written. Ergo, your joke is invalid.
LikeLike
Kill yourself faggot
LikeLike
I would love to ask my Senator, Feinstein, what legislation she will propose in the upcoming 6 years that will advance the interests of men? Or what men’s issue ( excluding gays) that she is she most proud having advocated for. Or what has she ever done for men? My guess is that she would probably be shocked someone even had the gall to ask her.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Like San Fran Nancy Palsi. When asked what part of the Constitution gave Congress the authorization for Obamacare, she replied “Are you serious!? Are you serious!?”.
LikeLike
She’d have you arrested, fired, or both . Do you have tenure ?
LikeLike
“what legislation she will propose in the upcoming 6 years”
Does that bag of bones have six years left in her?
LikeLike
Two criminals, a whore and a dry cleaner.
LikeLike
I’m never standing with my arms crossed again.
LikeLike
I’m surprised they aren’t in the Amy Cuddy-approved superwoman power pose with their arms on their hips.
LikeLike
Single White women are being co-opted by the Globohomo, whilst married White women are not? I’m not surprised.
The aliens know that White women not paired with a White man is the Achilles Heel of White civilization. Why else do you think they have waged relentless war against traditional gender roles and families, pushing gays and subversion of White men at every turn?
I know several of these single White women. Highly educated, high income and professional, they rode the carousel for years chasing the alpha. As they aged past 30, I watched each get dumped by boyfriends who were disgusted by their carousel count and figured (correctly) they could get a younger, hotter, more feminine, less you-go-grrrrl girl.
Despite their wealth and cats they are miserable.
One discovered that all her SMV would get her was a washed up no-ambition bartender who never finished college. It was the source of great pain for her. They were gonna get married but then decided to remain together without marriage. I suspect because she knew he would take her for everything if they divorced (which I think he would).
I don’t know about the other. She tries to fill the void in her soul with endless training for and running of marathons (btw I’ve noticed women who are really into marathons are to be avoided. Why? Dunno — discuss).
Both are sickeningly leftie, open borders types, bleeding hearts for the swarth types.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amy is the man, wo(man) that is. Those people in the picture so want you to bow down.
LikeLike
Posted before, but needed as a mind cleanser after contemplating those four:
LikeLike
has matt kangz written the script for this murrica fuck yeah
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
There is a sinister formulation substantiating the implosive ideology of (universal) “equality.”
Homo=same=EXACT SAME=self
Homosexuality = asexuality = radical sexual AUTONOMY = self-annihilation.
These four dykes represent instantiations of a convergence on asexuality where the masculine female merges with the feminine male at point androgyny, ie., self-annihilation.
So in this radically autonomous environment with a variety of genders, there are no real men or women, males or females. Just beings. And soon to be “knot being.”
LikeLike
“A thot has to deal with human reality as a thot which is what she is is not and which is not what she is.”
― Jean-Paul Sartre, Thots, Being and Nothingness
LikeLike
“Thot’ cannot be derived from higher concepts by definition, nor can she be presented through lower ones. But does this imply thot no longer offers a problem? Not at all. We can infer only that ‘thot’ cannot have the character of an entity. Thus we cannot apply to thot the concept of ‘definition’ as presented in traditional logic, […] which, within certain limits, provides a justifiable way of characterizing ‘entities’.”
― Martin Heidegger,Thots, Being and Time
LikeLike
LikeLike
Isaiah 3:12
Youths oppress My people, and women rule over them. My people, your leaders mislead you; they confuse the direction of your paths.
LikeLiked by 1 person
About the use of pronouns to obfuscate.
Way back during the Vietnam war, somebody said that
“we love our children more than they love theirs”, or equivalently
“they do not love their children as much as we love ours!”
This met with nothing but ridicule.
But, most likely, it was true. Let’s substitute the pronouns:
“the American people loves its children more than the Hanoi government loves Vietnamese children”.
This is quite plausible. A totalitarian government can use up a large proportion of the country’s population for whatever cause. A democratically elected government generally cannot do that, with a possible exception if the country is under an existential threat. And maybe not even then.
LikeLike