Feed on
Posts
Comments

Remember when shitlibs were about sexual freedom? Yeah, that’s over now. “Sexual racism” is the latest preprogrammed NPC line, and Globohomo, Inc has decided it’s time to stamp out the freedom of sexual choice in the name of encouraging more miscegenation.

My body, my choice? Not anymore.

Your racist body, our corrective choice.

You think this hyperbole. Oh no, if only. Mongrelization is now the openly stated goal for White nations and White people.

White people prefer white people on dating apps — but that could be changed, study says

Absolutely chilling.

Dating applications can allow users to fall into their own racial biases while searching for a partner, a new study says.

These “racial biases” in romantic preference are inborn and a structural part of human nature. Dating apps no more “allow” users to “fall into” these racial biases than food allows people to fall into a bias of eating for survival. “Racial bias” is what happens when people have freedom of choice; “racial bias” can only be “stamped out” if freedom of choice is likewise stamped out.

And that’s exactly what Globohomo wants to do! It’s totalitarian, baby! It’s not as if a pesky roadblock like human nature ever stopped totalitarians before from realizing their dystopian visions. </100milliondead>

But in their study, researchers from schools like Cornell University say the “sexual racism” that plagues apps like Grindr, Tinder and Bumble can be stamped out with a few simple changes. The end goal, the study says, is to promote more diverse pairings on the dating sites.

Why does that have to be the end goal? Isn’t real diversity promoted by allowing different races to reproductively sustain themselves through in-race preference, adding to the tapestry of human variety in the world?

Screw it, I should stop using logic on <racemix>NPCs. We all know why this is their end goal: they want to erase Wholesome Whiteness from the world.

Jevan Hutson, lead author of the study, said in a press release from Cornell University that “it’s really an unprecedented time for dating and meeting online” — which requires a more thorough look at how we can prevent discrimination on these dating apps.

I can’t be bothered to check, so I’ll assume at least one of the study authors is [a special person].

FYI, for a laugh, the study is called “Debiasing Desire”. These mad scientists are gonna have to figure out how to rewire White limbic systems without anyone putting up a fuss.

“More people are using these apps, and they’re critical infrastructures that don’t get a lot of attention when it comes to bias and discrimination,” he said in the press release. “Intimacy is very private, and rightly so, but our private lives have impacts on larger socioeconomic patterns that are systemic.”

Translating from the Evil-ese: “We can end inequality by mixing White genes with nonWhite genes, lowering Whites and raising nonWhites until everyone is the same, but diverse. Please clap.”

This has to be a put-on. Please let it be a put-on.

Take the case of Sinakhone Keodara for example. He threatened to sue Grindr, a dating app for gay, bi and trans men, because of “sexual racism” he faced on the site, NBC reported. More specifically, Keodara says some users on the site had captions like “Not interested in Asians.”

NOWAGS getting BTFO on gay dating sites, too.

Phumlani Kango, from Johannesburg, South Africa, said in an interview with NBC that the racism is prevalent in his country, too.

“What happens in Los Angeles … where you have ‘no fats, no femmes,’ it happens [in South Africa] as well,” he told NBC. “… They will say ‘no rice, no chocolate, no curry’ — which means no Asian, no black and no Indian.”

As noted by the study — which compiled data from prior research — white people are ten times more likely to receive a message from a black person on a dating app than they are to message the black user themselves. That suggests a hierarchy of attention on racial lines.

I already wrote about this. More precisely, dating app data analysis reveals White women are the most “racist” (ie they prefer to date in-race more than White men), and black men are more “racist” than black women, going by online dating preferences.

The study found other examples of inequality in dating apps, including:

  • Asian men and black women have the lowest chance of receiving a message or a response.
  • White people of “all ages” prefer to go on dates with other white people.
  • College students are most likely to avoid going on dates with black women.

Yes, reality has a bad habit of contradicting leftoid equalist blank slate delusions.

Stephanie Yeboah, a blogger, said that she has experienced racism as a black woman on online dating apps even when people are open to meeting up, according to The Independent. She said that some people ask offensive questions like if they can “get a taste of jungle fever” — and say they want to see if black women are “as aggressive in bed as they’ve heard.”

LOL I bet liberals write these articles to titillate themselves without risking social ostracism.

“Comments such as these are extremely dehumanizing to myself and other black women who are only looking for companionship,” she told The Independent. “It seems to suggest that black women are only good for one thing,

Ruining the DMV experience?

Even Christian Rudder, founder of OK Cupid, said that “when you’re looking at how two American strangers behave in a romantic context, race is the ultimate confounding factor.”

Race and sex are the alpha and omega of humanness.

But researchers behind the Cornell University study say they have some ways to push back against the racial biases of users.

Are [the special people] just pissed that their outmarriage rate is so high, and they want everyone else to join them in their festival of deracination?

The study’s authors noted that OK Cupid itself experimented with pairing up users and saying they were “highly compatible” — even though they weren’t considered good matches — and found that the conversation between the two people often went well.

Sy ops.

In other words, it appeared that just the mere suggestion that two people were compatible made both users more likely to give the connection a chance. The study’s authors wrote in a press release that it proves “the strong power of suggestion” that can be used to bridge the gap between people of different races.

“A chance” isn’t the same as “a realistic chance”. What do these reeducation camp kommissars think will happen when a White and black meet IRL and discover that they really aren’t as compatible as OKCupid lied to them they were?

Another potential solution could come from 9Monsters, a gay dating app from Japan, that allows people to describe themselves without explicitly revealing their race, according to the study’s authors.

A lot of these race-nullifying experiments are done with gay dating apps for a reason: gay men are less picky about their hookups.

Another gay dating app, called Hornet, prevents people from using their profile to mention race at all.

See?

And a final solution might come in the form of “Kindr,”

“final solution”

 a campaign from Grindr that seeks to stamp out prejudice on its app by promoting inclusion.

NPC mantra alert.

The study’s authors said positive writing about diversity may help promote more diverse couples on the apps.

If Diversity™ needs positive PR, then perhaps it isn’t intrinsically positive.

The new guidelines from Kindr, for example, suggest that users describe “what you’re into, not what you aren’t” to avoid offending others.

“I’m into White women.” Experiment destroyed.

“These guidelines exist to let you express yourself freely while also helping us maintain the safe, authentic, and accepting environment we strive to cultivate,” the guidelines read.

“Kindr is not going to solve racism by any means,” Zumwalt said, according to GQ. “These issues have been present in our community long before Grindr, but we hope to increase conversations around it and have a dialogue about what constitutes sexual racism.”

It must be cohencidental that these “dialogues” always focus on White “racism”, when in fact a sexual preference for one’s own race is evident in nonWhite races as well.

The study’s authors concede that sexual racism is a hard thing to conquer

Like trying to conquer appetite.

Or love.

— but Keodara, who threatened to sue Grindr, said fixing the problem would improve the mental well-being of people of color looking for a chance at love on dating apps, according to The Guardian.

Somewhere, right now, a nonWhite feels bad. White nations must be genetically diluted out of existence to help this person cheer up.

“Over the years I’ve had some pretty harrowing experiences,” Keodara told The Guardian. “You run across these profiles that say ‘no Asians’ or ‘I’m not attracted to Asians’. Seeing that all the time is grating; it affects your self-esteem.”

Here’s a thought: you could move back to your homeland where there are only other asians who won’t affect your racial self-esteem.

You laugh now, “how preposterous!”, but this Orwellian/Bergeronian nightmare is coming for us if we don’t crush these power-tripping globohomos before they can fulfill their dehumanizing, dystopian wish list.

Sexual racism = love doesn’t win, when it’s discriminatory love. It won’t be long before all (White) romantic standards are deemed racist or unfaaaaaaaiiirrrr. I’ll admit I morbidly relish the thought of virtue signaling SWPL White women coming under attack by the shitlib swarm for “discriminating” against short men, poor men, black men, and furries.

No White vagina, no peace!

Love trumps consent!

Bang a minority for equality!

As I wrote, back when I could see this day looming on the horizon,

It’s no more racist to prefer the opposite sex of your own race for dating and fucking than it is to prefer brunettes to blondes. If sex preferences are racist, then we need a new word for *real* racism; racism that includes things like forced segregation (superracism), racial violence (superduperracism) or slavery (goddamnthat’ssomebadassracismrightthere). But our sexual preferences are hardwired, and if the free expression of those preferences are racist, then racism itself is hardwired. Woops. Cat’s out of the bag!

Yes, the cat’s out of the bag, and globohomo has some ideas about how to stuff the cat back in.

33 Responses to “Globohomo’s Next Target: “Sexual Racism””

  1. oink says:

    Because

    “Egalite Fraternite”

    means something, Maitre.

    Anyway, L’Autre Chienne sends her royal regards.

    Like

  2. Ripp says:

    related:

    notice the narrative and the ah hem, “german”…um no…that’s a stad nigger invader

    of course I’d bet with 100% certainty that the producer and agency responsible for writing that was (((you know what)))

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Yeah, the stereotypical (and romantic) “blond beast” German man of yore is conveniently switched to a crotchety old scrawny crab, go figger.

      Like

  3. Clydesdale says:

    CH, glad you still have the energy for this stuff.

    At a nice ripe old age, time for me to say I’m happy to have a loving wife (first and only for me and no “significant others” in her past), some great kids that I think we’ve brought up right, and some good memories of what used to be the most advanced civilization and greatest country in the history of the world. (Fifty years ago we put men on the Moon. Today, we can barely pick up the garbage and keep the streets clear of snow.)

    White people wanting to reproduce with White people is now somehow wrong?

    I have faith that some of you youngsters see through this BS and have the energy to continue the fight. Sorry that so many of my generation let you down.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      We dropped the ball by being too busy, going to the moon and shit, to notice the creeping malaise.

      Back in the seventies, before I settled down, I tried fighting the good fight, waking people up, read all the samizdat, spread the word, hit the streets a few times…

      And then I decided the best way to help my people was to make more of ’em and raise ’em right.

      I don’t look back in anger, like yourself… but I don’t accept any “boomer” snark from subsequent generations that proved far more self-centered and profligate than we ever imagined in our wildest nightmares of Me Generation liberation.

      Like

      • streetsweeper says:

        once upon a time, in a village far far away, your trusty Uncle Greg was woke and tried to wake up other whites. but he was naive and later learned the error of his ways. so he stopped causing trouble and settled down and just lived a normal, comfortable, unquestioning life.

        and you should do the same, goyim.

        cool story, Uncle Greg!

        Like

  4. Jonathan Castle says:

    Money quotes:

    “but our private lives have impacts on larger socioeconomic patterns that are systemic.”

    Therefore, you can have no private life. We will decide. You are a thing in the Internet of Things.

    “OK Cupid itself experimented with pairing up users and saying they were “highly compatible” — even though they weren’t considered good matches”

    We will experiment on you like the lab rats you are. You really do have to a willing NPC to subject yourself to this.

    Like

  5. Thor says:

    “Comments such as these are extremely dehumanizing to myself and other …”
    The sentence is not only bad grammar, but also displays cowardice and borderline illiteracy. I am the only one who can do things for or to “myself”.
    Other people can do things to or for “me”. And yes, “me” is widely overused by the semiliterati, as is the other form “I”. “Mr. Ogadougo Cleptocrate told the following story to my partner and I”. Bad grammar, should be “me”. But “me” would have been correct in the sentence up top.

    And the semiliterati make it worse by trying to dodge the bullet by using “myself” when it is inappropriate.

    This would be nitpicking, except that it so pervasive.
    And sloppy grammar is usually accompanied by sloppy thinking.

    Like

  6. Scanman says:

    hmmmmm…

    I wonder which religious/ethnic group will be exempt from this latest campaign contra nature?

    Like

  7. Thor says:

    “race is the ultimate confounding factor.”
    I very much doubt that. Race should be at least as easy to model as age, occupation, height, IQ (horrors) or whatever.
    It becomes “confounding” only if you try to deliberately ignore it – or work it backwards, promoting miscegenation.
    Nature, to be ruled, must be obeyed, dixit Ayn Rand.

    Like

  8. Angry Gamer says:

    Considering as Grindr is a Gay dating app, I don’t understand how assumed racism can be taken as a serious factor. In hetero couples sure there is the issue of offspring but in Gay couples, not so much.

    I’ve counseled a lot women navigating online dating. These days I don’t even bother talking to a woman of color about her real prospects. I have a friend who is a very accomplished Black Female Techie. She’s now in cat lady age and no man in sight. 15 years ago I had an after work drink with her and discussed her real prospects of finding a man. When I told her pretty much what this article said she freaked. The idea that her race would be an issue first and foremost was intolerable to consider. But 15 years later she’s still single.

    Younger ladies who I talk to are the same way. Fresh off their peak of SMV they believe firmly they can have any man. But as the years go by they become educated on what is in demand in the dating market.

    This is probably why leftist get so freaked about dating realtalk popping up. In the privacy away from groupthink everyone makes decisions that are to their racial advantage and never PC.

    Same with Trump I’ve heard again and again how the media types don’t want Trump “normalized”. What they are really saying is they don’t want it to ever be ok to speak and act differently than the PC dogma preaches.

    Like

  9. markgm28 says:

    “Somewhere, right now, a nonWhite feels bad. White nations must be genetically diluted out of existence to help this person cheer up.”

    shivtastic

    Like

  10. Grace says:

    Dating websites have been rigged for a long time. As a white female, I would set my parameters for searches and suggested matches to white men only, and invariably, the website would send me men of other races. I knew better than to trust any website algorithms that determined “compatibility,” and that tried to force me to ignore the race and/or religion of the match. With multiculturalism and diversity at work and everywhere else, who really wants that challenge in their home or personal life.

    Like

  11. Jay in DC says:

    So basically now Big Brotha will make you love dat nigga dick or those purple poosay lips, like it or not wypipo. We will breed you out one way or another…

    Is it any wonder nobody wants to date black women? Personality alone has ALOT to do w/ it not even counting the nappy fro bush, black as midnight nips, and purple slit. Yuck on all counts. Even brothers straight up admit white wahmen are an order of magnitude more beautiful. Any person with eyes to see can tell you as much.

    Like

    • Captain John Charity Spring MA says:

      If the girl doesn’t make you hard…it’s literally mental masturbation.

      Like

  12. Jonathan Castle says:

    I guess they’ll have to shut down JDate.

    Very exclusionary.

    Like

  13. cortesar says:

    they are coming again and sorosh is paying them
    once you let first ones in they will just keep coming

    BREAKING: Footage in Honduras giving cash 2 women & children 2 join the caravan & storm the US border @ election time. Soros? US-backed NGOs? Time to investigate the source! pic.twitter.com/5pEByiGkkN

    — Rep. Matt Gaetz (@RepMattGaetz) October 17, 2018

    Like

  14. cortesar says:

    lolz
    0/1024

    Politics in the year 2018… pic.twitter.com/G5NBkNvvmg

    — Ann Kelly❌ (@Ann__Kelly) October 17, 2018

    Like

  15. Theodora says:

    What they want is genocide. A group of people is targeted for extermination by all means necessary, including attempts to engineer their sexual preferences.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Theodora, I meant to reply to you.

      Yes, these are the Darwinian Petri Dish Wars.

      The J00ish Race seeking to exterminate the White Race.

      Nothing less, nothing more.

      Like

  16. Clydesdale says:

    “Race is the ultimate confounding factor.”

    “Confound.” Definition: “Cause surprise or confusion in (someone), especially by acting against their expectations.”

    So it is “against their expectations” for white people to choose to reproduce with other white people?

    Say what?

    We do, indeed, live in strange times.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      >>>>> “So it is “against their expectations” for white people to choose to reproduce with other white people”

      That’s what I’ve been trying to tell people since forever.

      These are the Great Darwinian Petri Dish Wars.

      You cannot understand the state of the White Race in the 21st Century unless you acknowledge the biological imperative which compels the Jewish Race to drive Us into extinction.

      Only one colony of Bacteria can survive in the Darwinian Petri Dish.

      Not two.

      Just one.

      Like

  17. R.G. Camara says:

    Since Mel Brooks is on my mind, this seems timely:

    Like

Leave a Reply