Feed on
Posts
Comments

The quote in this post’s title is from a woman.

Is she wrong?

(h/t jeangray07)

speaking of big truths, this woman is getting ripped to shreds on Facebook for dropping some truth bombs

The authoress, Lori Alexander, tackles the subject from a Christian perspective:

Do you know how much more attractive debt-free virgins (without tattoos) are to young men? Unfortunately, there are so few of these types of young women anymore because of the high costs of college (debt) and sexual promiscuity even within those in the church. As believers in Jesus Christ, we need to live in a way that is pleasing to Him because His ways are the best. He calls debt a burden and urges us to live lives of sexual purity.

There are many more reasons why Christian young women should carefully consider whether or not they go to college, especially if they want to be wives and mothers someday. Secular universities teach against the God of the Bible and His ways. It’s far from what God calls women to be and do: it teaches them to be independent, loud, and immodest instead of having meek and quiet spirits.

She is right, because the New Testament of Jesus is basically age-old wisdom about the Darwinian nature of the sexes wrapped in religious symbolism. But I prefer to skip the middleman and go straight to the helical chaser.

Men prefer debt-free virgins without tattoos because

  1. debt indicates indulgence and low self-restraint, qualities that correlate with sluttiness (as well as being a golddigger)
  2. tattoos similarly indicate indulgence and impulsivity, also correlating with sluttiness (tats are cues for casual sex availability, which in a woman is opposed to her commitment worthiness. aesthetically, tats obscure and disfigure the clear, supple skin of prime fertility babes)
  3. sluttiness is unattractive to a man who is looking for a relationship (slutty women can’t be trusted)
  4. virginity in and of itself is attractive to men because it indicates a woman who has not become jaded and befouled from riding the cock carousel, a woman who will more easily fall deeply in love with her “first and only” man (for she has little to compare him too — see: alpha widowhood), and a woman who can be better trusted to remain faithful and therefore guarantee a father’s paternity should the two decide to commit and have kids
  5. not to mention, virginity means a tight twat, which is extremely pleasurable to a man

Anyhow, I’m glad that Christian housewives and Your Humble Heartiste can see eye to eye on the pressing issues of the day.

PS The fact that there are vanishingly few adult-aged American Woman virgins just means the few virgins there are get to enjoy sky high value on the marriage market. Work it, chasties!

97 Responses to “What Men Want: “Debt-Free Virgins Without Tattoos””

  1. “The fact that there are vanishingly few adult-aged American Woman virgins just means the few virgins there are get to enjoy sky high value on the marriage market.”

    Somebody was talking about Kimberly Guilfoyle recently, and speculating that she might have “Girl Game” – the ability to make a man relax, and feel at ease, and fell good & “Big” about himself.

    It’s pretty stunning that moar chicks don’t realize how far they could go in l!fe [in terms of marrying UP] if they would just work to hone their fem!nine wiles [in the best classical sense of “feminine”].

    Liked by 8 people

    • mendo says:

      Cappy, maybe they’re so out of touch, that the obvious, “well duh”, to us escapes them. It’s not even within their realm of consideration, let alone thought.

      It’s your buddy’s unknown unknown. You’d think it be obvious.

      Liked by 1 person

      • FastEddie says:

        @Mendo and CO:

        Serious quetion- What incentive do they have? Thirst is real, bros. I don’t think it’s an exaggeration to say 99.5% of men have absolutely no standards.

        The men on this blog are the best of the best, and yet there are guys HERE who cuck and cluck over Tomi Lahren and Lauren Southern who openly mud shark.

        So thirsty for potential virtual attention or an “ally” who pays lip service to the right message (though Tomi’s go girl abortion antics depart further by the day) that they’ll tolerate any treacherous behavior.

        Imagine it this way. We all know broads don’t like weak, soft, losers. But, pizza tastes good. Ice cream tastes good. And it’s a lot easier to give up than fight and win.

        Imagine you could just eat pizza, ice cream, and donuts every day – and still have cute chicks who want to bang you.

        Imagine if, on a lark, you could color all over yourself until you look like a reject extra from Mad Max- and you still have cute chicks who want to bang you.

        Imagine if you could be a total loser who lives in his mom’s basement without a penny to his name- and you still have cute chicks who want to bang you.

        Imagine you’re all those things. Now knock your IQ in half and plunge yourself in a world where all of society not only indulges those behaviors but actively encourages them.

        What incentive would you have to go out and be a real man?

        No shit broads don’t police their own camp anymore, but we don’t police our own. Let’s put our own house in order. To me that seems the vital first step. But, interested to hear your guys perspective.

        Rant over.
        Glad you’re all my bros.

        FE

        Liked by 3 people

      • Sun Tzu says:

        Men “police” our own alright

        The modern definition of masculinity is a fat middle aged man sitting on his ass, drinking beer, eating pizza and watching OTHER MEN playing sports while wearing a shitty sports jersey and yelling at a TV. And if you don’t watch sports you are not a “real man”

        Yes, communists have turned sports into the most cuck beta loser activity in history

        The college sports fans are even worse. Paying money to go to shitty sports games so college athlete chads can bang their women, how cucked can someone get

        When did masculinity devolve into yelling at a tv watching other men playing a damn game?

        Like

    • Somebody was talking about Kimberly Guilfoyle recently, and speculating that she might have “Girl Game” – the ability to make a man relax, and feel at ease, and fell good & “Big” about himself.

      It’s pretty stunning that moar chicks don’t realize how far they could go in l!fe [in terms of marrying UP] if they would just work to hone their fem!nine wiles [in the best classical sense of “feminine”].

      80% of girl game
      1. Be thin
      2. Don’t be a cunt

      This would improve 75% of the women out there before even getting to the more complicated parts of girl game

      Liked by 7 people

      • LB says:

        “Be thin. Don’t be a cunt.” On. Point. No tattoos and no debt would be nice too. But before anything else, be thin and don’t be a cunt. Perhaps the CH Army should post this message ad nauseam on every single girl-advice blog on the Internet. Forever. Maybe, just maybe, it’ll get through to a few young lassies before they desecrate themselves.

        Like

      • jeangray07 says:

        It really doesn’t take much effort to be kind. Feminism has done more than simply ruin bodies and minds; it’s ruined mental health. Women become so paralyzed with hate and fear, that they lash out at imagined predators without realizing life would be so much easier if they simply smiled. They seem to believe their kindness, if they have any, is something to be hoarded.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        Anecdote: at the bakery this morning, young, thin, tight Colombian girl greets me cheerfully and calls me “love”. I know it’s a ruse, but I do spend half a second considering the possibilities, even though I naturally recoil from her brown skin and dark eyes.

        Those two rules of attraction work, even across borders.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Nads says:

      She was married to Gavin Newsome and been recently linked to DJT, Jr.

      Like

    • Nads says:

      She divorced Gavin Newsome and recently linked to DJT, Jr.

      Like

    • Jay in DC says:

      When you are taught from a young age the universe centers upon you alone, and that all must bow and scrape before daddy’s little princess it is unthinkable that you would extend even a single iota of charm for any human being.

      I mean, that is so 1950s patriarchy… herding animals don’t think outside the box.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Cracker says:

        this is a great point

        much talk about girls being screwed up because they have neglectful parents, no father, or whatever. but having parents who raise them to think they are the center of the universe, a princess, etc do a lot of damage as well.

        Like

      • FastEddie says:

        “I mean, that is so 1950s patriarchy…”

        Write your own damn column already or book or whatever. You make me laugh on the reg.

        Like

  2. “She is right, because the New Testament of Jesus is basically age-old wisdom about the Darwinian nature of the sexes wrapped in religious symbolism.”

    These are the words that will get Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris to read here. God knows, they need to…

    Liked by 2 people

    • Captain John Charity Spring MA says:

      Dawkins is a regular.

      Like

    • King says:

      the New Testament of Jesus is basically age-old wisdom about the Darwinian nature of the sexes wrapped in religious symbolism. But I prefer to skip the middleman and go straight to the helical chaser.

      Yuh huh. You and Jordan Peterson are going to have to learn the hard way. But at least the Kermit Canuck has no pretenses about the possibility of “go[ing] straight to the helical chaser.” He will be a Christian in the next decade.

      At bottom, at the very very bottom, you are a positivist marxist with the same Just-So story undergirding your entire fantastical edifice. It’s like you can’t be satisfied with calling a mystery what it is — a mystery. You need a flimsy placeholder to hold everything up, no matter how absurd, in order to claim it as your own. Instead of the fathomless wisdom of “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?” you go for the inane simpleton’s “It’s turtles all the way down.” Make the abyss work for you, not against you!

      Your attempt at reconciliation with the right, while admirable in its intent, is doomed from the start. You have it precisely backwards: The New Testament isn’t Darwin wrapped in symbolism; Darwin is the New Testament wrapped in atheist drag. Because you think your arms aren’t too short to box with God — out of an arrogance so insane it beggars belief. You may not be sure who or what created you, but it is an entirely new level of civilization-destroying self-aggrandizement to unconsciously believe you created yourself.

      You cannot be simultaneously intelligent and on the right while promoting Sartrean-fag “existence precedes essence” existentialism. Either you’re attempting to square a circle, or you are not understanding the depths of the assertion you depend on.

      Sad SMH. You would’ve been a good general. But not when simple housewife humility runs circles around your decades-long attempt to prove yourself to be the author of yourself. Your think your five points of econ-sperg gobbledygook will ever resonate with men against a matron calling a slut a slut with authority from the Almighty? It hardly resonates with yourself in your more honest moments!

      Peterson has the good sense to be a medicated depressive about the futility of his mission, while you think you can continue to get away with trademarking the truth as your own invention, rather than something that preceded you by millennia. Nobody but you believes your hype, and you should be embarrassed that you still depend on it so much.

      Like

    • King says:

      the New Testament of Jesus is basically age-old wisdom about the Darwinian nature of the sexes wrapped in religious symbolism. But I prefer to skip the middleman and go straight to the helical chaser.

      Yuh huh. You and Jordan Peterson are going to have to learn the hard way. But at least the Kermit Canuck has no pretenses about the possibility of “go[ing] straight to the helical chaser.” He will be a Christian in the next decade.

      At bottom, at the very very bottom, you are a positivist marxist with the same Just-So story undergirding your entire fantastical edifice. It’s like you can’t be satisfied with calling a mystery what it is — a mystery. You need a flimsy placeholder to hold everything up, no matter how absurd, in order to claim everything as your own. Instead of the fathomless wisdom of “Where were you when I laid the foundation of the earth?” you go for the inane simpleton’s “It’s turtles all the way down.” Make the abyss work for you, not against you!

      Liked by 1 person

      • King says:

        Your attempt at reconciliation with the right, while admirable in its intent, is doomed from the start. You have it precisely backwards: The New Testament isn’t Darwin wrapped in symbolism; Darwin is the New Testament wrapped in atheist drag. Because you think your arms aren’t too short to box with God — out of an arrogance so insane it beggars belief. You may not be sure who or what created you, but it is an entirely new level of civilization-destroying self-aggrandizement to unconsciously believe you created yourself.

        You cannot be simultaneously intelligent and on the right while promoting Sartrean-fag “existence precedes essence” existentialism. Either you’re attempting to square a circle, or you are not understanding the depths of the assertion you depend on.

        Liked by 1 person

      • King says:

        You cannot be simultaneously intelligent and on the right while promoting Sartrean-fag “existence precedes essence” existentialism. Either you’re attempting to square a circle, or you are not understanding the depths of the assertion you depend on.

        Sad SMH. You would’ve been a good general. But not when simple hoúsewífe húmílity runs circles around your decades-long attempt to prove yourself to be the author of yourself. Your think your five points of econ-sperg góbblédygóók will ever resonate with men against a matron calling a slut a slut with authority from the Almighty? It hardly resonates with yourself in your more honest moments!

        Peterson has the good sense to be a medicated depressive about the futility of his mission, while you think you can continue to get away with trademarking the truth as your own invention, rather than something that preceded you by millennia. Nobody but you believes your hype, and you should be embarrassed that you still depend on it so much.

        Like

      • King says:

        Sád SMH. Yóú wóúld’vé béén á góód générál. Bút nót whén símplé hóúséwífé húmílítý rúns círclés áróúnd ýóúr décádés-lóng áttémpt tó próvé ýóúrsélf tó bé thé áúthór óf ýóúrsélf. Yóú thínk ýóúr fívé póínts óf écón-spérg góbblédýgóók wíll évér résónáté wíth mén ágáínst á mátrón cállíng á slút á slút wíth áúthórítý fróm thé Almíghtý? ít hárdlý résónátés wíth ýóúrsélf ín ýóúr móré hónést móménts!

        Pétérsón hás thé góód sénsé tó bé á médícátéd dépréssívé ábóút thé fútílítý óf hís míssíón, whílé ýóú thínk ýóú cán cóntínúé tó gét áwáý wíth trádémárkíng thé trúth ás ýóúr ówn ínvéntíón, ráthér thán sóméthíng thát précédéd ýóú bý míllénníá. Nóbódý bút ýóú bélíévés ýóúr hýpé, ánd ýóú shóúld bé émbárrásséd thát ýóú stíll dépénd ón ít só múch.

        (And fuck you very much for my having to resort to sanskrit to post a simple point.)

        Liked by 2 people

      • Jay in DC says:

        Not to get into a philosophical discussion BUT– “It’s turtles all the way down.”

        This is in no way counter to faith in the almighty. The Unmoved Mover. The Spirit of all Creation. Whatever you wish to call the unknowable and unfathomable.

        And in point of fact, many scientists who are respectful of their boundaries tend to stop their arguments at the observable universe and do not even attempt to speculate beyond that point. It is advice that I would give to religious folks as well.

        ‘Stay in your lane’, as it were. Some things were told to you in scripture, but probably an unfathomable amount was NOT told to you. So you are guessing or speculating just as much as the next guy about the true nature of all of existence.

        These mysteries you speak of, I believe in as well, though perhaps not in the exact same way as you do. It is very clear to my mind that we are here merely as transients and there is more than is humanly imaginable beyond the veil. Why we are only allowed small nuggets of knowledge and glimpses is part of that mystery. You, I’m guessing would say this is where faith abides, I don’t share that exact same viewpoint.

        Anyways, a much higher ‘vibrational state’ conversation than what this forum allows for. Let’s get back to naggers and joos. 🙂

        Like

  3. […] What Men Want: “Debt-Free Virgins Without Tattoos” […]

    Like

  4. Captain John Charity Spring MA says:

    A virgin female carries a high price in Dahomey.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. earl says:

    ‘The fact that there are vanishingly few adult-aged American Woman virgins just means the few virgins there are get to enjoy sky high value on the marriage market. Work it, chasties!’

    Hypergamy of a different kind.

    Let it be known just because she’s a virgin doesn’t negate hypergamy. AWALT.

    Another reason she’s right…all the autistic screeching from the who-ars and simps on the internet reacting to this.

    Like

  6. I miss the days when tattoos were only the hallmark of scumbags. Now they’re billboards for sluts and faggots.

    There’s a “male” in one of my martial arts classes who fits the prototype: tall, thin, pale, nice, self-effacing, problem glasses. His noodly arms are covered shoulder to fingertips with a hideous hurricane of ink.

    I find that almost more offensive than the tragedy of a beautiful woman tainting her virgin skin. At least some of them are intense and can fuck like beasts.

    “He’s got a beard and menacing looking tattoos. My girl could definitely take him.”

    Clown world indeed.

    Liked by 7 people

    • Jay in DC says:

      Yeah, like the beard, it is another indicator of masculine the faggot hipster has co-opted to make himself appear less soy infused and effeminate.

      There was a time when a few tattoos were a fairly reliable indicator you were either a pretty tough salty sailor or a take no shit ex-con. Those halycon days are long gone.

      They are now mainly indicators of low self esteem and bitch boy mangina status.

      Liked by 6 people

      • King says:

        Beards are for manboys who feel compelled to hide their faces out of daddyless insecurity. Or éminence grises who have earned respect.

        Like

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        WTF King? God gave men beards. Did He do so as a prank, meaning for us to shave them? Should the lion also chew off his mane? Do you even principle? Or is it all just exerting your own opinion?

        Like

    • Tam the Bam says:

      During the Brixton riots ( the proper one 1981 I think) we avoided the likes of the George Canning round the corner, and the other locals that served decent Guinness as they were basically Jamaican howffs (others we always shunned, because Provo bunkers, and we couldn’t afford the collection plate).
      Went a bit west of Effra Road, to erstwhile whiteworkingclass-land. One good place we were pleased to see the hideous Magwitch-like barman dispel a few proto-hipsters/benders with the unfailing and traditional incantation of
      ” Ye-ew gotta hear-ring! In my book, only man wat ‘as a hear-ring .. is eeva a poof, orra poirate. Yew don’ look loike no poirate ter me!”
      [exeunt omnes]

      Changed days …

      Like

  7. earl says:

    Also to add…virginity takes out the possibility she’s carrying some HPV in the womb.

    Liked by 4 people

  8. Tiberius says:

    I’ve wondered how I would react to an opportunity to court a young, attractive, virgin, good girl. I know I’d want her but most of my game is going straight for the lay and then after the fact seeing what comes of it. I am the corrupted youth.

    Like

  9. The Question says:

    1. debt indicates indulgence and low self-restraint, qualities that correlate with sluttiness (as well as being a golddigger)

    There’s another thing to consider – time is money, and if the guy gets stuck with paying off her debts, she’s essentially stolen his time that could have been spent doing other things. It’s even worse if she was taking out that debt to live a YOLO lifestyle in her 20s while he was keeping his nose to the grindstone so he could make enough money to have a family. Debt broadcasts a lack of long-term thinking and sense of personal responsibility.

    Liked by 6 people

    • Cracker says:

      very true

      and girls like this will continue spending irresponsibly the whole time you’re with them. instead of trying to save your hard earned dollars like a good woman should, they will always be wanting something. always shopping, always thinking she needs this or that, etc

      these types of girls have something missing in them and as you said, low self-restraint, so her habit of acquiring more more more to fill her empty soul will be endless

      Liked by 1 person

  10. ar10308 says:

    Seeing the responses of supposedly Christian women in the replies on FB should be enough to Red Pill any Blue Pill Beta Churchian boy.

    Liked by 8 people

    • earl says:

      Being around supposedly Christian women was more than enough red pilling.

      Liked by 6 people

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Christian women, heh… bring up the Scriptures about women not being preachers and staying silent in church and suddenly you’ll hear how “that’s just misogynist Paul writing” respect for God’s Word.

      Hell, look at the number of denominations that now have queers and women pastors, bishops, etc
      .
      (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Liked by 8 people

  11. The guys I know…and my four sons all in their early 20s, would literally give it all to tat free, whore free, YHVH loving woman, regardless of her looks. And I suspect, she would also be blessed with enough beauty, to make the above a “closed sale” in a heartbeat.

    I know I would. I haven’t had a girlfriend since 2005…because…the choices out there, the hideous vicious programming that is modern American bitch, is nothing I want in my life full time. Friends…sure…the occasional dinner, sure. But anything beyond that and I’m laughing out loud. And I’m not an ugly dude. My avatar is me, a surfer, at the beach, current pic. Chicks flirt with me all the time. I a BMW X3, MBZ CLK320. and a Tacoma truck, SR5 fully loaded with shell, all in perfect condition and the nice cliff house between Ojai and Santa Barbara to go with all the above.

    But, Yeshua comes first, and in that regard, these modern communist antifa witches simply are out of the running. Their vicious patter makes any beauty they have vanish, once their hate filled feminist blather starts spewing out.

    It’s too bad guys no longer have any choice but to pump and dump. And who can blame them.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Moses says:

      Owning all those depreciating assets is poor resource allocation, doubly so if you borrowed to buy them. You can drive only one car at a time after all. Better to have that capital invested and appreciating/generating income than bleeding away through depreciation.

      Liked by 1 person

    • mendo says:

      DM, is there a reason you like your own posts? Does that make it easier to reference them via wordpress or similar?

      Like

    • Jay in DC says:

      “I a BMW X3, MBZ CLK320. and a Tacoma truck, SR5 fully loadéd with shéll, all in pérféct condition and thé nicé cliff housé bétwéén Ojai and Santa Barbara to go with all thé abové.”

      Familiar with thé phrasé ‘n1ggér rich’? Cuz um… yéah. Although if you havé a pad in that géographic location I’m présuming your incomé has 6 zéroés aftér thé first digit in which casé I givé you a bit of a pass. Although as pointéd out, théré aré far béttér things to do with that capital than buy 150K+ worth of véhiclés.

      Like

  12. Brendan says:

    “Debt-Free Virgins Without Tattoos”

    That pretty much limits you to girls 17 and under.

    [CH: yes. an impossibility in an era of delayed first age of marriage and dildo instructional classes for middle schoolers.]

    Liked by 8 people

  13. Truth-hammer says:

    Yes, (((university))).

    Like

  14. chris says:

    7. Virginity also means that the woman hasn’t been giving the man’s rivals a better sexual deal than she gave him (beta bux/alpha fux) which would be maladaptive for regular men.

    Liked by 1 person

    • chris says:

      * Maladaptive in a state of nature (which is what our brain has evolved responses to stimuli for, aka our brain acts as if contraception doesn’t exist).

      In a state of nature, if a minority of men are reaping all the sex from women through a short term mating strategy (your intended wife included) and you are sitting there plugging yourself away expending effort to pursue a long term mating strategy, then you are losing the game of reproductive fitness. Your strategy is maladaptive. That is why men also like virgins. Men don’t want to lose the mating game.

      Like

    • King says:

      Zzzzz. How much longer are you saps going to cling to this stuff to rationalize your loserdom? You were supposed to glean the practical lesson from these overengineered platitudes, not adopt them as a dark beta religion.

      It’s just so BORING to watch active minds bounding themselves in a nutshell. You are better than this.

      Alas, spergery is the white man’s (interior) burden. A fantastic tool to shape the world, and deadly when turned against the self. Thanks, Jews!

      Like

      • chris says:

        I have no idea what you are talking about. I was describing how an evolutionary system works to select for a mating preference in men.

        Like

      • King says:

        Ohhhhhhhh. You were talking about evolution? I SEE THAT NOW THANK YOU.

        Scratch my whole reply. If a galaxy brain like Chris has no idea what I’m talking about, what’s the sense of saying anything?

        Like

      • Marc says:

        Humans make the beast with two backs because that allowed the female to look into the eyes of the male and bond him more closely to her. Or allowed her to see over the tall grass of the African savannah. Or something.
        And the rhinosauros has wrinkly skin because the Parsee …

        Like

      • chris says:

        What the fuck is wrong with you? You write as if I am mid-way in a conversation with you that I have been privy to for ages and then when asked to elaborate, (after I myself offer an elaboration in an attempt to clear up any misunderstanding), you immediately jump to shaming and insulting.

        You write like a histrionic women. Go fuck yourself.

        Like

    • chris says:

      Should be *has

      Like

    • Suburban_elk says:

      chris, approach week was five years ago

      iow we want virgins too

      Like

  15. Carlos Danger says:

    For those who dream of Mad Max

    Like

    • Jay in DC says:

      I’m skeptical this was written by an actual Venezuelan there are certain tells in the writing style. But that being said, nothing too surprising here.

      The people talking shit about total societal meltdown have never known hardship, it is quite obvious. You are not the star of the movie who survives against all odds. You are one the thousand extras who get mowed done by the raging uruk-hai hordes in the first 10 minutes of the film.

      But you can’t get through to these people, which is why I stopped talking about it. MUH CIVIL WAR. Yeah ok tough guy… its spergy as fuck and so unrealistic I don’t even engage. That being said, if we hit a wall at some point, it may be the only way. A hard reset will certainly clear the poz, but it will also wash away vast swaths of good people and it will take decades if not centuries to return to some semblance of the civilization we enjoyed. Be careful what you wish for, and all that, innit.

      p.s. That video was almost unwatchable for me. That 1980s speak and spell voice is grating as hell, dunno why that guy insists on using it. It is like listening to Stephen Hawking. :-/

      Liked by 2 people

      • Ironsides says:

        Ōnē dōēs nōt ṇēēḍ tō bēlīēvē īn ōnē’s ōwn sūrvīvāl, thāt ōnē wīll pērsōnālly mōw dōwn ēvēn ōnē ēnēmy, ōr ēvēn thāt ōnē’s ōwn sīdē wīll wīn īn ōrdēr tō thīnk thāt ā hōt cīvīl wār īs prōbāblē gīvēn thāt thē Whītē pōpūlātīōn īs splīt bētwēēn īncrēāsīngly dērāngēd lēftīst cūltīsts ānd nōn-lēftīsts.

        Pēōplē whō, āddīṭīōnālly, hātē ēāch ōthēr’s gūts tō ān īrrēcōncīālīblē dēgṛēē.

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        Ādd īn hūndrēds ōf mīllīōns ōf ārrōgānt brōwns whō ārē ālrēādy clāīmīng thē tērrītōry ās thēīr ōwn ānd yōū hāvē ōnē ōf hīstōry’s lārgēr pōwdērkēgs.

        “Māny gōōd pēōplē wīll dīē.” Wēll — dūh. Thāt īs ān ōbsērvātīōn, NŌT ā rēāsōn why cōnflīct wīll nōt ōccūr. Mīllīōns ōf gōōd pēōplē dīēd īn thē Spānīsh, Rūssīān, ānd Yūgōslāv Cīvīl Wārs ālsō. Thāt dīd nōt prēvēnt thēm frōm ōccūrrīng. Sāmē wīth ŪS Cīvīl Wār I.

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        Āt thīs pōīnt īt’s dīffīcūlt tō sēē āny ōūtcōmē ōthēr thān ēīthēr thē sūbjūgātīōn ānd ēxtīnctīōn ōf Whītēs, ōr thē sēttlīng ōf thē
        issūē īn thē fāshīōn thāt hās bēēn usēd cōūntlēss tīmēs bēfōrē, spēcūlātīvēly lēādīng tō bālkānīzātīōn.

        Hēll, Hēārtīstē hīmsēlf sāys “Dīvērsīty + Prōxīmīty = Wār.” Pēōplē wīll ēvēntūālly try tō āssērt thē dōmīnāncē ōf thēiṛ ēthnōs īn ā rēgīōn by drīvīng ōthērs ōūt. Tō ēxpēct rādīcālly ūnlīkē pēōplē tō līvē īn kūmbāyā hārmōny fōrēvēr sīmply bēcāūsē yōū ārē scārēd ōf cōnflīct īs fāntāsy.

        Thē (((māss īmmīgrātīōn sūppōrtērs))) ārē mākīng cōnflīct ōn ā grānd scālē īnēvītāblē. Īt prōbābly ālrēādy īs bākēd īn thē cākē, sōōnēr thān wē thīnk.

        Ānd ās fōr tākīng cēntūrīēs tō rēcōvēr — thē hūmān cōckrōāch īs ā bīt ṭōūghēr thān thāt, īf hīstōry īs ānythīng tō gō by.

        Like

  16. Naresh says:

    Here is a question

    If you have to pick a woman who only has 2 out 3 which two would you want in her

    Like

  17. whereiscourtney says:

    Odd… The typical man typically recoils when I tell him I’m a virgin. Although that could be the degradation of society heavily conditioning him to see a virgin or even the withholding of sex until commitment as a ‘no-go’…because as we all know, if she doesn’t put anything out by the third date she’s a freak of nature by today’s standards.

    [CH: recoil? yeah, some men may do that because they think virgin = won’t put out. depends what the man is looking for. if you want a better reaction, focus on men who seem like they are ready for a relationship.
    as far as the 3 date rule goes, yeah that’s important for men to follow because women have become corrupted by their liberated sexual power and will friendzone men who don’t bust a move sooner rather than later. iow, men with experience have learned that to get women to fall in love with them they first have to get women to fuck them.]

    Liked by 1 person

    • Rotten says:

      That man is doing you a favor. Instead of wasting your limited time and wasting your mental energies on nothing that would ever be more than a pump and dump, you can move to the next opportunity.

      Liked by 3 people

      • whereiscourtney says:

        Thanks, Rotten. I do realize that, though it gets extremely difficult to date because most men under 40 [I’m in my late 20s] are brainwashed with a similar ideology, alas making the eligible pool quite small. I haven’t been on a date since 2015!

        Like

    • Anonymous says:

      I am a young virgin too and I am planning on going to Ireland to find a man. I want a husband who is young, also a virgin and doesn’t believe in birth control.

      Like

    • Anonymous says:

      I am a young virgin too and a lot of men act interested, but my intuition just tells me that they are not sincere in what they say. I just get a sense that they are lying about being virgins themselves, or that they don’t share my ideals and are just saying so to try to trick me. Because I don’t believe in birth control I need a man who won’t change his mind 15 years down the line and want to stop reproducing when times get hard and there are many mouths to feed. I need a man that will go all in and stick with our ideals.

      Like

    • Mr. Generic says:

      The only men that recoil at virgins are PUAs who might still feel remorse for robbing a woman of her virginity via pump-and-dumpery. Any man that looks at you like that should be immediately nexted!

      Liked by 1 person

  18. Bored housewive in Bogota called Esmerelda says:

    Debt-free virgins without tattoos who aren’t crazy.

    That’s a start, anyway.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. Jaded Jurist says:

    Married one. Last night over wine, she was cheerfully praising God for bringing the two of us together.

    Liked by 2 people

  20. Anonymous says:

    Lots of young, white, kind-hearted virgins that want marriage and babies here in Newfoundland!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion