The Jumbotron Test is essentially a visualization of Poon Commandments V and VI.
Every text or email or recordable instance of conversation you have with a girl must follow this simple rule:
If it were given a public airing, let’s say on a blog or a sports stadium jumbotron, you should feel comfortable with what you have written for the world to see. You should not feel an urge to wince, because it will be clear to everyone reading it how alpha you are. If the thought of someone other than you and your girl reading your permanently archived romantic exchanges makes you cringe with embarrassment, then you are doing something wrong that will eventually lead to your girl dumping you.
Poon Commandment V:
V. Adhere to the golden ratio
Give your woman 2/3 of everything she gives you. For every three calls or texts, give her two back. Three declarations of love earn two in return. Three gifts; two nights out. Give her two displays of affection and stop until she has answered with three more. When she speaks, you reply with fewer words. When she emotes, you emote less. The idea behind the golden ratio is twofold — it establishes your greater value by making her chase you, and it demonstrates that you have the self-restraint to avoid getting swept up in her personal dramas. Refraining from reciprocating everything she does for you in equal measure instills in her the proper attitude of belief in your higher status. In her deepest loins it is what she truly wants.
Poon Commandment VI:
VI. Keep her guessing
True to their inscrutable natures, women ask questions they don’t really want direct answers to. Woe be the man who plays it straight — his fate is the suffering of the beta. Evade, tease, obfuscate. She thrives when she has to imagine what you’re thinking about her, and withers when she knows exactly how you feel. A woman may want financial and family security, but she does not want passion security. In the same manner, when she has displeased you, punish swiftly, but when she has done you right, reward slowly. Reward her good behavior intermittently and unpredictably and she will never tire of working hard to please you.
I’ve seen, heard of, and executed some impressive text game that could publicly air to accolades from discerning viewers, but I’ve rarely seen the Jumbotron Test (or should I call it, the Jumbrotron Test) crushed so thoroughly as it was in this exchange:
Skittles Man has met his match: 2$ Big Towels Bro.
Ok ok I know what you’re all thinking…”Look at the chick, CH. It’s easy to give zero fucks when the fuck is a zero.”
No argument there. State control doesn’t operate in a vacuum; the amplitude of the disturbance matters. Still, many omegas and betas fail the Jumbotron Test under extremely favorable conditions. So give this bro some love, he spun that broad’s hamster wheel into orbit and gave the public a good laugh.
More than texts. Imagine your life is on a Jumbotron. A smirk wins. Aloofness appeals. Style scores.
And for Pete’s sake act like you have there before with chicks hotter than the one you are with now.
LikeLike
lzozolzlzozozo
zllzzozozozloo
LikeLiked by 1 person
obviously every one of those men failed for not assessing the situation correctly and proposing without knowing there was a guaranteed yes. but only an absolute cunt would humiliate someone in public like that
all of those bitches could easily have said yes so as not to shame him for all to see then tell him later in private that it was a no go
cold hearted bitches, all of them
LikeLike
some of these are fake but in all instances men look better than
womenz they kneel in front of
blessed is the kingdom of beta shmucks
LikeLiked by 1 person
> all of those bitches could easily have said yes so as not to shame him for all to see then tell him later in private that it was a no go
Not really an option. The instant she said yes, all kinds of wheels would go into motion and the social juggernaut would be very difficult to recall.
LikeLike
Cracker: NEVER “propose” to a chick. Betas ask questions; Alphas issue commands.
BETA: Will you m@rry me [and then d!vorce r@pe me in five years]?
ALPHA < looking her squarely in her eyes > : Get off your B!rth C0ntrol.
LikeLiked by 3 people
no need telling me that CO. in full agreement there. point was how cunty these women are
@Paul Murray
i’m not buying it. public humiliation like what these girls have done (real or no) is unacceptable. she could easily be gracious in public then nip things in the bud after the fact.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Cracker, it’s a metaphysically important point for the n00bies.
The very act of asking a woman for her hand in m@rriage sets you in stone for all eternity as her Beta Cuck div0rce-r@pe piggy bank.
Betas ask questions.
Alphas issue commands.
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol@ people expecting women to be “nice” to a loser and to salve his feelings. I mean, cmon now, this is women we are talking about.
Nah, dudes shouldn’t be doing this shit. I haven’t met a woman yet who wanted a public proposal like this. Plenty who’d have said yes in spite of it, but it’s not particularly “romantic” in their minds…it’s really a man thinking that something that would appeal to him should appeal to her.
You’d do better to take her out into the desert alone during a meteor shower and turn and look her in the eye and say “marry me.” If she says no at least there are no witnesses and a lot of empty dirt.
LikeLike
dudes should never do this. Girls don’t want this.
And, what, expect a woman to have sympathy for a loser? GTFO these are women.
Take her to the desert alone for a meteor shower. If she says no, bury her out there
LikeLike
These are cringe worthy. I was nervous as hell, but I just slipped the ring on her finger. Didn’t get down on one knee, either.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Rejection porn at its finest
LikeLiked by 2 people
exquisite.
LikeLike
That’s some ghey ass shit. I don’t feel sorry for any of them, just attention whoring. Especially the fakes.
Lame.
LikeLike
Common reaction among the women (1) strike the man physically; (2) run away. The need of women to protect their social standing (Hamster: I don’t want to be associated with this loser) is that strong.
LikeLike
interesting the reactions from some of you. you sound like female apologists to me.
i don’t care how pathetic the men are, it should still be acknowledged that these women acted in a shitty way that is unacceptable and they should be held accountable for it.
no matter how much of a loser a man is, he doesn’t make a woman act like a cunt. she chooses to be that way.
if she doesn’t have the common decency to spare him from public humiliation at her hand, she is a bitch, plain and simple.
accepting that kind of shitty behavior from women and blaming it on men is why we lose.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Women feed off emotions the way we feed off sex. They get off on it, even if they don’t love the dude back.
Again, for the n00bs: a “boyfriend” is for women what a fvck-buddy is for us.
And this… this is what eventually happens when girls keep their emotional fvck-buddies / “boyfriends” around for too long.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oldie but goodie:
The Elaborate Proposal As Mate Guarding Behavior
LikeLiked by 2 people
Cracker, no doubt these are shitty women, I think that’s a given. But men are supposed to be smarter than this. Doing something like this in a very public setting that should be a very private, intimate, special highlight of your shared lives is a total leadership fail, and if that’s an example of the decision making process of these men, then they deserve the result. In fact that’s exactly the correct result. Shitty planning = a shitty result.
The best slant you can put on it is that both sides probably dodged a bullet.
Gotta lol at streetshitter getting ko’d though. That should be done on general principle.
LikeLiked by 1 person
How is it that Indian men actually breed?
LikeLike
[…] When The Jumbotron Test Is Crushed […]
LikeLike
Terse Text / Non Sequitur game is essential. If any chick is as much of a drama queen as that one, and I’ve had quite a few myself, she needs to be treated as a irritation. Hell, she WANTS to be treated that way, and she doesn’t consciously know why.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah her posting that was showing him off. She actually is semi conscious of that fact. She’s showing off her man’s passing of shit test.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I have made this mistake even when you instructed me, even when I knew better. The shame. More, the squandered chance to put a womyn in her place when she was on the way out anyway. Onward! Upward!
LikeLike
Lash, we learn more from our mistakes than from our successes – as long as we know what our mistakes were.
Onwards and upwards.
LikeLiked by 1 person
One of my better exchanges…
I’d banged this girl two or three times before, and I knew the “what are we” chat was coming, except… she threw me a curve ball:
Her: I’m excited to see you tonight
Me: yeah it’s a been a while
Her: sooo you never come over to my place, I’m always coming to you
Me: yeah
Her: well why dont you ever come to me
Me: …?
Her: nevermind, I’ll see you soon 😀
I was genuinely shocked how little work was required and how quickly it had an effect. I wasn’t quite sure what her angle was… was she just trying to regain frame, was it a sh!t-test, was she in some weird way trying to hint that she had feelings? I knew the details were irrelevant after she showed up in an enticingly low cut tank top… man that girl was stacked haha.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Re: her angle
It’s the unending effort to put a leash on a man, even after you’ve knocked her socks off.
I’m going through it now with a smitten hottie.
“Look at this dress, it’s so cute!
Me: *grunt*
LikeLike
Whatever the girl looks like, this is an effective response. I also like the sarcastic heart in these situations. As in:
Girl: You’re an asshole/you did X wrong/ blah blah etc.
You: ❤
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thats nigger texting, though. Who gives a fuck what niggers text? The dude probably has a borderline retarded IQ and couldn’t read what she said.
LikeLiked by 7 people
Toss my kalesalad
LikeLike
LikeLike
“jc penny have”.
I want to punch a brick wall.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Might be in the UK.
The Limeys pluralize a whole bunch of singular sh!znat.
LikeLike
But he said 2$ towels, not 2 pound. Magic Eight Ball says……. black.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Look at the picture of the she-boon. Why would you even make the stretch to assume that this was British?
LikeLike
The weave on her is epic.
That’s something that will never sit well with me; sewing another person’s hair on your head, even if you’re own hair is ugly and unpresentable.
LikeLike
Nah, it was great. Judging only by the content of its characters.
I love that it’s JC Penny lol a gift-wrapped turd like her, and a towel sale mister mundane, really puts the cherries on top.
LikeLike
“Judging only by the content of its characters.”
Heh heh! MLK would approve. Well done.
LikeLike
Doesn’t count, because I’m racist.
“Wen it gon be OURZ TIME”
When you learn to put “AN” in front of a word, that WHEN SPOKEN, begins with a vowel.
“An NAACP member..”
The letter N is pronounced EN. So you use AN. For AN ‘N’.
Naggers.
LikeLike
Off-topic, but… this kicks ass somewhere:
LikeLiked by 1 person
I could swear I read that actually happened IRL sometime back
LikeLike
What’s the bet IRL the bitch would sue his @ss for “pain and suffering”, “broken contracts”, etc, and WIN. Bigly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Awesome.
This kind of occasional, unpredictable aloofness is dyn-o-mite when the chick is smitten. The only problem is that even if a guy has high value, he still usually has to invest a lot more in the beginning to reach this point.
I think the 90/10 rule that says you have to do 90% of the talking off the open is exaggerated. She may talk your ear off. But you still have to do 80-90% of the leading and idea generation, because if she’s like most chicks, most of her talk is designed to occupy all of your time, while giving you none of her ‘gine.
You still have to lead throughout the entire relationship. The goal is just to get so deeply in her head that you can eventually lead by not leading, i.e. aloofness. Long text convos at any point don’t have to be off limits, as long as they are 100% on your terms. I’m narcissistic and enjoy one-sided conversations where I can talk about myself and bounce my latest thoughts off someone. I just inflict it on girls instead of friends.
Being extremely verbose, social or talkative are not liabilities IF you remember to be detached enough to walk away at will. In fact, I would argue that this “poet style” text game where I freely talk up a storm makes me MUCH more effective at keeping quality women after I’ve pulled them. I do the brooding mysterious artist trip on them and have deep, long conversations that make them say things like “Who ARE you?”(I thank Costanza every time I hear it)
Once I establish this precedent, any takeaways I do(and I do a lot) will be infinitely more effective if she is already hooked. My best relationships were really nothing BUT long takeaways, where I established a precedent of being thoughtful, aware, considerate, and then would just reel it back in suddenly by 80%. A woman who is hooked by this point will lunge for you desperately to fill the sudden vacuum, and stay on the line for years if you want.
Value is only ever a liability to your game if you rely on your external assets only. If you have game too and she knows it–which she will–women will not hard test you because she knows you will walk. The trick is to make her feel awash in your value before you take it away.
This runs contrary to most advice that puts long conversations as sin #1, and sudden change of frame as #2. But personally I’ve found that if you have the skill, high investment usually equals high return that lets you coast if it’s the right kind of investment. And I MEAN investment. Some guys talk about chicks clinically as investments, but do things like “game my girlfriend.” That ain’t an investment, it’s a full time job.
Women are like cats. I once fed an aloof cat near my place a few times, and after the second time it continued to run to me for the next year even though I never fed it again. That’s conditioning. It’s also a good illustration of stupidity. Remember it when dealing with the fairer sex: she should always feel like she’s just on the verge of getting the Big Reward. But she only gets to feed when you want it, which should be never. So you do it just enough to keep her coming back for more.
Women are just wired this way. A cat will run to the person who gave them tuna(substitute tingles) forever even if you never open another can again. Just like they will ignore a person who actually HAS what they need and even WANTS to take care of them if they don’t have that sense of familiarity and certainty about you. It’s the tragic dilemma for betas: you will not be given an opportunity to prove yourself unless you have ALREADY proven yourself.
This is why Game is both an art and a science, and puzzles newbies as much as Schrodingers cat. It’s sometimes more like solving a zen koan than a logical problem. If you satisfy her, she will come over. If you DON’T satisfy her, she will cum all over you.
LikeLike
My nominee for cuck of the week https://imgur.com/a/yMeet
This is Sportsball player Lorenzo Cain btw https://imgur.com/a/VcCry
LikeLike
“bring the movies” still the king.
LikeLike
PHYSIOGNOMY QUIZ: Guess the personality.
LikeLike
LikeLike
She’s a Persian nationalist and can’t make little Persian Horse archers.
LikeLike
goys I present you this famous Spanish guide of eligible young ladies yearning to found a family aka known as
Our Ladies of Eternal Vows”
No more excuses, no more complaining about the lack of m_ar_riageable material
LikeLiked by 1 person
lolz!
LikeLiked by 1 person
We need vegan yoga control.
LikeLiked by 1 person
She reminds me of a soccer player in that Michael Jackson hat – Renaldo? Aged 39, still slender, madder than a box of frogs.
LikeLike
She was definitely mad yesterday, that’s fo d@mn sho.
LikeLike
The PoMo fempowerment left finally have their Eliot Rodger. pic.twitter.com/lmst0RU7hQ
— Rollo Tomassi (@RationalMale) April 4, 2018
LikeLiked by 1 person
It was the return of Gozer the Gozerian!
LikeLike
You’ve got that right, Hackett. 😉
LikeLike
This is the result of not having children at an early age. All this insanity and animal love is displaced maternal instinct.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Tomassi is a cuck.
LikeLiked by 1 person
She and Sharon Stone should have gotten together an remade an angrier version of Thelma & Louise.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Female JewTube shooter. Who apparently is a free speech, anti-degenerate advocate who quotes Der Fuhrer in her “manifesto”.
Something is fishy about this. Again.
LikeLike
not all farsi speaking vegan bodybuilder trannies are like that
LikeLike
droll
LikeLike
Well, if nothing else, she at least chose her target based on the rationale of them being responsible for their policies, and paying accordingly.
I don’t know if this will make a difference, but I gotta feel that, if you’re going to look to redress an issue, the appropriate target makes more sense than a random shoot-up.
Imagine how quickly the stooge reporters of the (((MSM))) would get back to ethical journalism if, every time they tried their poz agitprop fake news, somebody showed up at the office to… correct… them.
LikeLike
But are a bunch of random underlings “the appropriate target”?
LikeLiked by 1 person
“We were just following orders” hasn’t flown as a defense since Nuremberg, amirite?
LikeLike
Granted, the chiefs would be better targets, but a gal’s gotta start SOMEWHERE, amirite? 😉
LikeLike
the (((news))) said she was white. She looks like a fucking dot head injun.
LikeLike
She’s one of them Persian Aryans we’ve all been hearing about. :duckface
LikeLike
That is one weird looking hombre, er, wench.
LikeLiked by 1 person
menstruation is a bitch (heh)
LikeLike
Game tends to flow effortlessly when a guy perceives a girl as lower value and attainable. Only when a guy views a girl as better than him does he start to fuck up.
“Natural” game is in every guy, its just the flux of his self-perceived value that determines when and on who he uses game.
LikeLiked by 1 person
good point
LikeLike
A lot of important truth to that.
That’s why it’s critical to manage your self-image, and manage your perception of others–especially females. Your default perception may be a truth, but it is not necessarily The Truth.
Like, most girls don’t know anything, and they look mediocre without the makeup hair and clothes, and you find all that out once you get to know them. And then you wonder why you were ever anxious.
LikeLike
That was the biggest thing to learn for me when I first found all this stuff. Why I did well with girls I wasn’t interested in and why I did poorly with ones I liked.
LikeLike
Donte DiVincenzo… Most Outstanding Player of the Final Four, deleted… racially insensitive and homophobic remarks…
LikeLike
quesiton guys:
when a girl gives you a word answer， ”i see” or ”oh”
do u re engage with her after 2 days, or text something stupid like gayyy
i wanna see the context of reply but i cant cause its on whatsapp
LikeLike
Send her a birthday cat or other asymmetric text.
LikeLiked by 1 person
so the more ridicuolous nonsense my reply is the better? attraction is not fully logical? she might reply with something like , ”what”, should i proceed more or ghost her for awhile
LikeLike
the general rule is be more aloof than her. so whatever little effort she makes you need to split that down to a third of that until you’re basically send her a single subatomic particle every billion years or until your unavailability finally spikes her interest or she starts ovulating or there’s a vacancy in her vag that needs filling.
…or just ignore the lame text banter and hit her up every 2-3 weeks for a casual, UNLOADED IRL meetup. “heading to the pub w some friends later you’re welcome to join us. bring a friend”, or some shit like that
and never forget: two in the hopper keeps the oneitis from turning you into a mewling pile of betatude
LikeLike
IRL means? yeah..im ghosting this girl for three days now i have had asked out twice, she also mentioned im kinda mysterious on text, i told her ”feeling comes and go, cheris this moment” aka try to be indifferent without explaining myself too much
LikeLike
Breitbart: ‘“We’re going to be doing things militarily,” Trump said Tuesday at a White House meeting. “Until we can have a wall and proper security, we’re going to be guarding our border with the military.”’
lolz, imagine using the military to defend your country instead of on idiotic foreign adventures (c.f. the last 100 years.)
LikeLiked by 3 people
I guess Blormph is done now, this idea is too cray cray even for me.
At this rate, his next lunatic idea will be that we should have sound money instead of a casino economy run by circus clowns and pickpockets.
LikeLike
They’re laughing all the way from the money printing machines to their private islands…
LikeLike
What is it that you have a problem with?
LikeLike
Check your sarcasm detector’s battery, Stiffy.
LikeLike
I’m hoping that the PRK thing is a negotiated deal for a reunification of Korea with a complete US withdrawal. This would benefit every side. Kim didn’t go to Beijing for tourism; he was summoned.
The massing of Chinese troops on the PRK border gives me some optimism. But at the end of the day, if it happens, it will be a result of Japan. If I were negotiating with Xi, that’s what I’d have offered. A consequence of an armed and proliferating PRK is that Japan has been making noises for several years now about amending their Constitution to permit offensive capability as well as nuclear weapons. A weaponized nuclear program in PRK would have mandated the latter and this would be something very negative for China. In such a scenario, South Korea would be justified in developing a nuclear deterrent as well.
LikeLiked by 1 person
South Korea doesn’t benefit. All those poor, malnourished, undereducated/underskilled norks with bad manners will flood into their country and they’ll have to figure out what to do with them.
LikeLike
I dunno if things have changed in the past twenty or so years, but last I remember, the South Koreans don’t particularly care for their brethren up north… and if there were a reunification, the only way it would work would be if the gummint were entirely under the aegis of the South and Kim and his boys took a loooooong vacation.
LikeLike
want to get Kim Jong-un under the fold? threaten North Korea with a refugee resettlement program.
LikeLike
“want to get Kim Jong-un under the fold? threaten North Korea with a refugee resettlement program.”
Why not pay North Korea to put illegal aliens in their work camps?
LikeLike
whew!
https://mobile.twitter.com/JackPosobiec/status/981192425904500736
LikeLike
LikeLike
Donte DiVincenzo… Most Outstanding Player of the Final Four, deleted… racially insensitive and homophobic remarks…
LikeLike
Shocked… shocked to learn!
LikeLike
Well no shytt… white athletes are almost always Trump supporters.
LikeLike
“racially insensitive and homophobic remarks” = “letting mentally ill men flash grade schoolers in the women’s bathrooms at Target is a bad idea”
LikeLike
The Jumbotron test reminds me of mom telling me that God is always watching so I need to behave even when alone. That is, if I wouldn’t do something when she is watching I shouldn’t do it. It also reminds me of the hippy attitude described in the book “Electric Koolaid Acid Test” where they said each person is always the star in his own movie. Does the person you are interacting with enjoy your movie?
LikeLike
Hat’s off to that homeboy for his towel response. Funniest thing I saw all week, except for CH’s comment in a more recent thread that, “Set up an easel in your bedroom and tell her you’re gonna draw a picture of her with your dick.” That was the funniest shit by far.
LikeLike