Feed on
Posts
Comments

Terms Of Impalement

It’s time to re-introduce classic terms of disparagement that have fallen out of favor with the snarkerati. I’m thinking words like “traitor”, “coward”, “f@ggot”, “skank”, and “whore”.

We really need these powerful, masculine words now more than ever as our nation increasingly is held hostage by traitors, cowards, f@ggots, skanks, and whores.

365 Responses to “Terms Of Impalement”

  1. Libertardian says:

    I’d take in a heartbeat a group of newly naturalized American citizens over the spoiled native-born know-nothings of CPAC, who today booed at the mention of citizenship naturalization ceremonies.

    — Bill Kristol (@BillKristol) February 24, 2018

    [CH: kristolnacht’s itchin’ for that #110, isn’t he?]

    Like

  2. plumpjack says:

    ch, you just used about half my vocabulary in one sentence.

    the other half consists of modifiers for the first half: fucking, filthy, dumb, stupid, and spineless.

    Liked by 8 people

  3. Lance Draper says:

    Make Retard Great Again

    Liked by 6 people

    • Captain Obvious says:

      I love “Weimerica”, but it’s only gonna work on [no more than some fraction of] the IQ >= 130 crowd.

      Still, when you’re around that crowd, you need to work it into the conversation as much as possible.

      Make Weimerica Great Again.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I also love the term “Entartete Kunst” – if one of the local Momzzzezes calls and asks, “Would your kids like to come with us to see (((the latest Poz from Disney))),” then you say, “Oh, I’m terribly sorry, but we try to keep the Entartete Kunst out of our children’s lives. Thanks so much for calling!!!”

        Liked by 1 person

      • Tam the Bam says:

        I’d avoid words like “Kunst” around that sort of person. They’re dyslexic and functionally illiterate in English, never mind German. Good way to get the screeching harpy flock to call the po-po on you.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Like

      • dickycone says:

        Cool, never figured my IQ for over 130. Really, anyone with a basic education and passing knowledge of history SHOULD be able to get that reference.

        Like

    • SteveRogers42 says:

      Lunatic. Idiot. Moron. Defectoid. Imbecile. Democrat.

      Like

  4. […] Terms Of Impalement […]

    Like

  5. Anonymous says:

    Moron is my biggest one

    Liked by 1 person

  6. jvo17 says:

    Used in a sentence:

    “Did you see that skank ho Hillary with the traitor coward Barry?”

    Increase Your Word Power ™

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Hypno says:

    Bastard.

    Communist.

    Cunt.

    Liked by 2 people

  8. Hawk says:

    The F word belongs to us.

    My favorite, learned in NYC:

    F-ck-@ss

    Like

  9. Rick Derris says:

    What about “hogg?”

    No, it really is slang for a guy who won’t shut the f*ck up:

    https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=hogg

    Also note that David Hogg’s entitled boogie-board-riding power-bottom was called a SPECIAL SNOWFLAKE by the lifeguard:

    Like

  10. Cesare says:

    Personally, I think tone is as important as invective. If you can/will just locate and foment that element of fury within and make extreme eye contact at volume, in my experience the day is absolutely yours…and I don’t care if it short dicks every cannibal in the Congo.

    Like

  11. I don’t give a shit about their feelings, but since I don’t know how moderators want to appear to the uninitiated, I will use a camouflage for N!66ers until some other person uses the appropriate appellation. Personally, I think it describes them perfectly, but the dindus seem to find it a term of disparagement. Good! I say let’s own this perfectly good word again.

    Like

  12. ar10308 says:

    I’m also a fan of the Deadwood staple “Cocksucker”.

    Like

  13. The Judge says:

    They never left my vocabulary.

    Btw, you forgot N[redacted]

    Like

  14. Joel W says:

    What do you mean reintroduce? Who in their right mind has ever stop using those terms, and others like them? I use one or more of them daily at least. eal talk is the only way.

    Like

  15. Cool Shoes says:

    I like the terms “degenerate” or “useless eaters”.

    Like

  16. I feel like we are in a civil war with the left and their imported shock troops. They’d try to fire you if you could just for having the wrong opinions and want to make anything you values, be it God, the NRA, our American history, meritocracy, or jobs for americans first…it’s a crime to believe in and needs to be scrubbed from the market place of ideas.

    So…of course, we need to shiv back, buycott our own side, and not let them set the terms of polite discourse.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Lichthof says:

      I’ve never seen hysteria like this before. Hilariously my company landed the NRA as a client and shitlib employees are threatening to quit if we do the work

      Like

      • Guy466 says:

        It’s not hilarious that we are surrounded by such morons. It’s tragic.

        Like

      • JironGhrad says:

        Sounds like a hiring frenzy is in the works.

        Like

      • Lichthof says:

        I agree. Was hilarious that we landed them as a client. But now we turned the job down so the tolerant shitlib mob mentality wins the day. They are agaisnt violence but wish ahrm on the NRA.
        I now have shitlibs talking about “moving anywhere” which basically means (formerly white) Western Europe. I assume Turkey, China, the Middle East etc does not fit their beliefs?
        I said to one shitlib ‘you live in a Democrat area.. 90% of the media are Dems..all the celebs are Dems.. the colleges etc..what else you want?”. Silence.

        CNN must be winding these cunts up.

        [CH: shitlibs want total submission to their worldview. even one dissident is one too many for the typical leftoid. that’s why war will have to come in some form to cleanse shitlibs of their delusions.]

        Like

  17. Henry A says:

    Bring back “slattern”.

    Liked by 2 people

  18. Southern WASP says:

    Tell all the limp wristed, hysterical, fairy, homo, commie, fat asses, to go feed their cats.

    Liked by 2 people

  19. How about what Marvel comics used when they published the Conan the Barbarian series. Instead of son of a bitch, which violated the comics code, they used “son of a she-dog”.

    Like

  20. Hawk says:

    Can also go highbrow in the correct context:

    Catamite

    S0d0mite

    Onanist

    Pederast

    Liked by 1 person

  21. Ralph Stanley says:

    A friend of mine once quipped, “Well, you’re a misogynist.” I shot back with, “you’re a traitor.”

    Felt good.

    Like

    • Stake From Jake Jarm says:

      right? Also…if these nu-cucks are so anti-russia and all that, then why are they agents for Russia’s cultural marxism?

      Like

      • 0844 says:

        Cause it isn’t Russian. Cultural Marxism is (((Bolshevism)))

        They hate Russia for rejecting the leftist secular multicultural cuckery to return to Orthodox Christianity and Russian ethnic pride.

        Liked by 5 people

    • SteveRogers42 says:

      “You’re part…eggplant”!

      And you’re a cantelope”!

      Like

  22. cortesar says:

    it has been while since I enjoyed so much the art of short form

    Soros puppets meet Italian police.. pic.twitter.com/6k0uiiLCw6

    — Voice of Europe (@V_of_Europe) February 23, 2018

    Liked by 5 people

  23. OldFart says:

    This covers all the terms listed:

    Like

      • Stake From Jake Jarm says:

        they love the idea of diversity but actual evidence shows that most of them just splinter off into their own no-go zones…or, like in America, they’re force fed into positions of power and influence. From which we’ve seen, they really still fucking hate us.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Literally, a dancing monkey.

      Like

    • cortesar says:

      when you are rebuffed by a street shitting scribbler. the same one you perform your monkey dance for

      Liked by 3 people

      • skorzecin150 says:

        Lol, even the streetshitters are pwning this wannabe sodomite.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Jesus H Chr!st, a woke streetsh!tter?

        Liked by 3 people

      • hans says:

        This Indian debacle by Castro´s Bastard did more damage to Canadian “street cred” than loosing to Germany in Olympic Ice-hockey.

        Like

      • White nationalists will always look down on Indians unfortunately, so I’m trying to build an Indian alternative to the alt-right.

        Liked by 1 person

      • demono says:

        at least he (presumably) chose to remain in India. I have also noticed that hindus living in India tend to be friendlier and more humble, while those living in the west are downright obnoxious

        Like

      • demono says:

        @Red Pill Indian
        I was at a party once. this was back when I was trying to improve my social behaviour so I was doing a deliberate effort to stretch my comfort zone when it came to interacting with strangers, so I barely knew anyone at this venue. There was a man of japanese descent who seemed quite at ease despite his frail physique, so I started to observe him to see what I could learn. He was talking with his acquaintances about the most mundane of things, when suddenly a black asked him what he thought of the atrocities committed by Imperial Japan in ww2. the question was delivered flat just like that. No subtlety whatsoever. My interest was piqued. This was something I had always wondered, but never dared to ask. I leaned to hear what he was going to say. He casually waved him away saying “that moment is over”, or something to this effect. and everyone carried on talking as before. What struck me as unusual was that I didn’t feel any sort of guilt in him. He didn’t express any unfavourable judgement on the matter; to him, it was just another war with a lot of people killed. or maybe to him the Emperor was right. But his utter refusal to trash talk his forefathers was one of my first red pills.

        the takeaway is, people still want to stick to their own kind despite perceived slights by others, a lesson that whites need to re-learn. I’m afraid that hindus don’t have this problem.

        Like

  24. gunslingergregi says:

    dumb fat bitch who gonna be dead within the month

    Like

  25. Craig says:

    ” our nation increasingly is held hostage by traitors, cowards, f@ggots, skanks, and whores.” and maniacal blow hard jack offs in MSM.

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Jaded Jurist says:

    OT: from the eccentric but well-read contrarian polymath Miles Mathis comes another angle regarding why the forces of evil are anti-male.

    “In my opinion, [#MeToo] isn’t being promoted to protect women from men. It is being promoted to split the sexes further…. And why are the sexes being split? Several reasons, but the central one is financial. The [globohomo fuggernaut overlords] figured out long ago that single people spend far more money than couples, especially if the single people are sexually repressed and miserable. There is a multi-billion dollar market in anti-depressants … but it isn’t just anti-depressants. Miserable single people spend far more on compensating products, like comfort food, clothes, make-up, toiletries, drugs, gym memberships, hair treatments, facelifts, cosmetic dentistry, massages, therapy, porn, and on and on.

    “The sexes are also being split for other reasons, perhaps the most important of which is the complete de-masculating and detoothing of men…. Making men the target of societal hatred, censure, and distrust, is a planned and so-far successful method of destroying them. And why would [(((they)))] wish to do that? Because any potential revolution would come from men … the more the governors fear revolution the more they will try to destroy the motivation, ambition, and energy of men.”

    Liked by 5 people

    • traitors first says:

      that last paragraph is gold and should be some kinda COTW

      Like

      • SteveRogers42 says:

        Just one little modification: Put “white” in front of “men” each time.

        There is no campaign to de-masculate and detooth blacks and beans. In fact, just the opposite.

        Like

    • Vagina dominator says:

      They certainly want the men of the West to be physically and psychically weak, unarmed, and not ready to fight.

      Nothing could be more blatantly obvious. It is utterly undeniable. But for precisely what eventuality and when? What is the precise plan? We can only speculate.

      Perhaps, once the economy blows up – meaning the end of welfare and the financialized corporation – they want to be the only ones who can deploy masculinity and trad values. Who they will use against us – to retain their power – and how in a no-money environment is an interesting open question.

      In the meantime, white men should eat well, be masculine in their behavior and cultivate a resilient outlook, and join groups where they can get training in arms and warfare.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        “They certainly want the men of the West to be physically and psychically weak, unarmed, and not ready to fight.”

        Yeah, and that’s just our armed forces!

        Liked by 1 person

  27. “The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out.”” JG

    Liked by 5 people

  28. Lovekraft says:

    “Turned out”
    “GloboJihadInc”
    “ABT Syndrome” (anything but this syndrome to describe female dissatisfaction at current relationship/marriage without real justification)
    “minions” as in Oprah’s minions (her clueless zombie fans)

    I’d like to introduce a new word: ‘Skeptician’. Someone who doesn’t easily buy any narrative and requires the other party to make the case under incisive scrutiny.

    Like

  29. PA says:

    Terms of impalement are also needed for single moms and divorcees.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Call their children b@stards.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Vagina dominator says:

      Unmarried mom or divorced mom beats single moms. And they aren’t single moms anyway. Once they have children,they are no longer single are they? At that point they are a package deal. Leaving aside of course the example of Casey Anthony.

      Like

      • TLM says:

        Yes, I hate the single mom BS. They should be called divorcée, or for the ones that were never married, whore works well.

        And as a kid we called people Gay-ites. I miss that one.

        Like

  30. Captain Obvious says:

    CPAC speaker (((Mona Charen))) stuns with fiery rebuke of Trump, Le Pen http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/cpac-speaker-mona-charen-stuns-with-fiery-rebuke-of-trump-marine-le-pen/article/2649965

    Like

  31. Vagina dominator says:

    Weaklings. Perverts.

    Like

  32. Busy bodies. Peeping Toms. Gossips.Scolds. Henpecking nags. Frustrated. Fat. Frigid. Unmarried. Childless. Desperate. Hysterical. Two-faced. Sneaky. Spiteful. Bitter. Unloved.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hysteria & HYSTERECTOMY were two awesome concepts from Eisenhower-era Amerikkka.

      And then the neurosurgical variation of hysterectomy which Uncle Joe Kennedy visited upon poor nymphomaniac Rosemary: The frontal lobotomy.

      Like

  33. Vagina dominator says:

    Busy bodies. Peeping Toms. Gossips.Scolds. Henpecking nags. Frustrated. Fat. Frigid. Unm@rried. Ch1ldless. Desperate. Hysterical. Two-faced. Sneaky. Spiteful. Bitter. Unloved.

    Like

  34. I think telling White grandparents whose daughter mud-sharked and squeezed out some mulattoes that their grandchildren are “Cute little pickaninnies” could be very effective.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Melungeons if the m0ther is White.

      Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        “Oh how cute! Are they quadroons or octaroons?”

        Liked by 1 person

      • Ironsides says:

        “Melungeon” sounds like a game fish. “Mulatto” is good enough, it’s a lot more recognizable and easier to say.

        Pickaninny is a great term for the larval groid, though.

        Like

    • PA says:

      “You must be very proud.”

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “They look just like you!”

        [Accompanied by not-so-subtle grimace indicating that of course they don’t look like her whatsoever.]

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        Savage, both of you.

        Like

      • skorzecin150 says:

        Savage, but nothing less than they deserve.

        When the collapse comes, the races mixers will be the first to go. Whites will not expend the remaining limited resources on traitors (except maybe liberals – which I hope they do, they’re only going to hasten their own demise in the end), and the colored’s (I’m adopting this by the way), won’t have anything to do with them as per usual.

        Liked by 1 person

  35. […] Source: Heartiste […]

    Like

  36. Vagina dominator says:

    Deformed.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Lovekraft says:

    “Bluecheck” as in twitter’s blue verified checkmark. To indicate one who has acquiesced in pushing the Narrative.
    “Turned out” typical SJW who has been demoralized and damaged, similar to a pimp’s ‘product.’
    “GloboJihadInc” self-explanatory
    “ABT Syndrome (or AnythingbutThis Syndrome) describes the psychological neurotic western woman who nukes a family/relationship/marriage based on indefinable feelz.

    Like

  38. Alfred E. Neuman says:

    Reblogged this on FOR GOD AND COUNTRY.

    Like

  39. Lovekraft says:

    Test. If this comment goes through, it’s verification that my comment was picked up by an algo. And comment did not have any extreme language.

    Like

  40. Lovekraft says:

    My comment offered: globojihadinc, bluecheck, turned out and ABT Syndrome.

    Like

  41. Tris says:

    I’m a 64 year old white male cisgendered diversity-loving (actual) lefty and yet I often can relate to you, including here, maybe because I’m more traditional than you young’uns due to my age. I use ‘traitor’ for Trump/Clinton and other neoliberals, ‘coward’ for the sheriff’s deputy at Parkland who failed to be the “good guy with a gun”, “f@ggot” for Attorney General Jeff Sessions (my god, can’t you see that???) and “skank”/”whore” for the c*nts around Trump, come on wake up you guys!!

    Like

    • You’re a woman

      Liked by 2 people

    • skorzecin150 says:

      Damn you OF, I’m gonna be spending WAY too much time on that little gem!

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      I’m a 64 year old white male cisgendered diversity-loving ..

      You spelled ‘neutered’ wrong, toots.

      Like

    • Ironsides says:

      “Cisgendered,” ffs.

      Even if you are nominally male, you gave up the last shredded scrap of your man card right there. Actually, you p1ssed on it with soy-infested urine.

      Anyone who seriously uses that word is beneath contempt.

      Like

    • Ironsides says:

      “Cisgendered” ffs.

      The correct word is “normal,” you mewling quim.

      Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      Shut up, Strapon.

      Like

    • 4 deputies were ordered to stand down. Read vox day and learn something. Cum on you, guy!!

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        At first I thought this was most probable, but if this guy in question was ordered to stand down, why isn’t he defending his name instead of quitting and going into hiding, while his chief rakes him through the coals and the prez himself calls him a coward?

        Like

      • Anonymous White Male says:

        “At first I thought this was most probable, but if this guy in question was ordered to stand down, why isn’t he defending his name instead of quitting and going into hiding, while his chief rakes him through the coals and the prez himself calls him a coward?”

        Same reason people sell drugs. Its not so great from a moral or ethical perspective, but, damn, the cash flow is great!

        He will be compensated, disappear from the public eye, move to another area, and be given a security job in which he can sleep on the job. The package his masters gave him will allow him to retire at 50 with a very comfortable lifestyle.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I don’t buy it.

        Everywhere he goes from now on, he’ll be pilloried. I don’t care what kind of “retirement package” he might have gotten, that’s too high a price to pay for dying the proverbial “thousand deaths”.

        A man who isn’t a coward wouldh’t stand for it, and there’s nothing they can take away from him if he came out today and said “Fuck you, Scott Israel and you too, Trump… I was TOLD to stand down.”

        Naw, he just chose to play it safe or was just too dumb to know how to handle the situation, even though he’d been getting paid a damn nice salary over the years to be prepared.

        Youze yeggs just can’t break away from the CT mold, can ya?

        Like

      • SteveRogers42 says:

        It would have been imprudent, ineffective, and likely against policy for a lone cop to advance into a chaotic crime scene like Parkland. But now it turns out that four cops failed to enter. Four is enough to form a hasty “go” team and advance into the school in a diamond formation. This has been the general standard of practice ever since Columbine. If a group of four cops failed to act, then it’s more than just cowardice.

        Keep your eyes on the Sheriff from Coral Springs SO. He seems to be inclined to speak the truth.

        Like

  42. Mr. Frosty says:

    Calling a liberal “fake” seems to hit them hard.

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      anything connoting slavish obedience/non-critical/unimaginative thinking/corporate enablers also hurts them where it counts: their false identity as “liberators” of the “oppressed”.

      Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        I always tell them that they are “programmed” (by the mainstream media, by Soros) and just parroting thing they haven’t even given any real thought to..

        “Yeh? Who gave you that opinion?”

        That stops them d3ad because they like to think of themselves as very original freethinkers.

        Liked by 1 person

  43. Moses says:

    I love that Trump called that deputy in Florida a “coward.” That’s what he was.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      He PHONED IT IN. I don’t think he was a coward. I think he was FOLLOWING ORDERS [which were coming from a SCRIPT] http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3635045/posts

      Like

    • Scanman says:

      The beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper name.

      — Confucius

      Liked by 1 person

    • vfm#7634 says:

      “Yellow” Scot Peterson

      (especially since he’s definitely part-black…)

      Liked by 1 person

    • oink says:

      @Moe

      And you expect a ((resource officer)) to brave SMG fire for 17 37 fiat usd per hour?!?

      Liked by 1 person

      • There was no “SMG fire” it was a hoax

        Liked by 1 person

      • oink says:

        the only thing missing was
        the three stooges theme

        the hilarious backfire on the ((polis-chief)) of the attempt to throw the mu|ato under the bus (he shoulda remembered Jim Conley)

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        The kike sheriff isn’t being skewered for coming down on the n1gger, at least not overtly… he’s getting the business because it happened on his watch and he tried to make the NRA the bad guys.

        Oh, and there’s this little surprise, surprise tidbit about when you let a jew into the candy store:

        He took heat for hiring political allies and childhood chums after becoming sheriff in 2012 and for failing to report that a campaign booster paid for a yacht cruise and party after his first election.

        Liked by 1 person

    • bigjohn33 says:

      Maybe Scot Peterson is a coward. Maybe not. He’s pretty black. I understand if he didn’t want to risk his ass to save a bunch of white kids. Hell. I wouldn’t risk my ass even if it meant I could save the life of every single black person in the entire world. I don’t think that is necessarily cowardly. Just strong in-group bias.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I understand if he didn’t want to risk his ass to save a bunch of white kids.

        Oh, but he sho’ nuff, sho’ nuff been takin’ da White Man’s money to do dat job, amirite?

        “I wouldn’t risk…”

        Knock off the solipsistic apologetic dumbassery, will ya? White men who accept the job of LEO risk their lives all time for folks of all colours, just as a sense of duty and honor for the paycheck they earn.

        Don’t be giving this particular n1gger or his kike bosses an excuse.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Liked by 2 people

      • bigjohn33 says:

        I think white men who risk their lives for “folks of all colours” are fools.

        I understand those who do it for the paycheck but the sense of duty or honor in doing so is horribly misguided.

        There is no honor in sacrificing yourself for the benefit of your enemies.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Honour is a gift a man gives to himself.

        You live by your morals… such as they are.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

        Landscapers “put their lives on the line” way more than cops do. Cops don’t even make the list. COWS are more dangerous than American criminals.

        https://247wallst.com/special-report/2018/01/02/25-most-dangerous-jobs-in-america/2/

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        This isn’t a contest to see what profession takes the most risks… this is a gainsay of the nihilistic attitude that you don’t stick your neck out for others, even if they’re paying you to do it.

        This type of Cyberian nah-ah nonsense is why we lose.

        Like

      • bigjohn33 says:

        There is a big difference between sticking your neck out for your own people and sticking your neck out for other people.

        The money part of it is irrelevant. You can’t buy loyalty. That is the lesson to be learned from Scot Peterson.

        I hate the “why we lose” meme, Greg. It implies “we” are losers and that is not the case. IF we lose it will be because white people try to build up relational equity with other peoples and expect them to reciprocate.

        Like

      • bigjohn33 says:

        ‘Duty’ is not a concept that translates across racial lines. It only goes one way; from whites to others.

        Like

  44. PA says:

    “Boy” for adult black males.

    Liked by 2 people

  45. KyGrifter says:

    “Baby killers” is very effective.
    Also “You’re pussyhat is on too tight.”

    Like

    • Jaded Jurist says:

      Sorry, those are weak. They have their defenses up for the first and they take the second as a compliment. No shiv value. Has to sink deeper to be a shiv.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        There’s no hope for chicks who murd3r their own ch!llunzzzezes.

        Steer a WIDE berth.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        I was once giving one grief about murd3ring her b@by and the best she could come up with was “How dare you! You have no idea how hard it was for me to make that choice!”

        Hmmmm…let’s compare hardships: the t0rment of having to choose between losing your girlish figure and having to raise a child vs. the t0rment of being burned to d3ath in saline solution or ripped apart by tongs.

        Fvckin soulless.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Vagina dominator says:

        Yes. Good shivs are about *public shame*. Recent discussion here had it that shitlibs were concerned only with fairness and something else (I forget what).

        But really, all they care about is status and how they appear to the group their self-image) and so SHAME is what we want to make them feel with our shivs; public exposure of some weakness or failing (like being stupid, uninformed, robotic, not up to scratch in some way).

        Liked by 1 person

    • plumpjack says:

      putting sloots in the same category ass-ramming, hiv-infected, body-fluid-slurping homosexual men, I believe, is the most effective sloot-shaming approach for these numb times.

      Liked by 3 people

      • Jaded Jurist says:

        This is why “Felcher” deserves to become primetime. It’s not a classic, but the visual is world-changing to someone who doesn’t know what f@ggots like to do.

        For the unawares and lazy, top Urban Dictionary def is: “During @nal s3x when [c]um is released into the @$s, the FELCHER is the person who removes the [c]um [with his lips], using a straw or not.”

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Felching for Duckbutter- A Butthole Surfers classic! I have to admit, that band was one of my more memorable concerts. I ruled the mosh pit that day. Opening bands were Flaming Lips and the Stone Temple Pilots or as Gibby said Stone Pimple Toilets.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Where is the CO Robert Peemore photo?

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Chewing chocolate

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “the FELCHER is the person who removes the [c]um [with his lips], using a straw or not.”

        Okay, even I’m not gonna make a parody of that sh!znat.

        Like

  46. Truth-hammer says:

    I prefer the word ‘cunt’, but mostly in reference to white male cucks/libtards. It works well for pretty much anyone. An equal opportunity term.

    Like

  47. Captain Obvious says:

    Apparently (((Scott Israel))) knocked up a 17yo yenta, who had to have an ab0rtion.

    https://www.youtube.com/user/scottisrael2012

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      It’s okay, according to the Talmud, babeez who haven’t taken their first breath yet have no souls.

      But then again, all unbaptized people in general (whether jew, muslim, hindu, slope, or degenerate westerner) don’t truly have their own souls either — they’re under the control of the devil.

      Liked by 1 person

      • oink says:

        @7634
        I don’t think Boss’s warning against grownups harming the “little ones” came with “applies only to da baptised” caveat

        ymmv

        Liked by 1 person

      • Anonymous says:

        (((They))) sure don’t have a problem with genital mutilation or sucking blood out of baby penises.

        Sick fucking people and a sick fucking religion.

        Anti-Semitism is a healthy mindset. Semitism is some sick depraved shit.

        I dream of an ethnostate for my people, unpolluted with semitic ideas, semitic usury, nigger violence, and beaner crime. Without goat fucking or Sharia law too.

        Is that so much to ask?

        Like

      • Roy says:

        (((They))) sure don’t have a problem with genital mutilation or sucking blood out of baby penises.

        Sick fucking people and a sick fucking religion.

        Anti-Semitism is a healthy mindset. Semitism is some sick depraved shit.

        I dream of an ethnostate for my people, unpolluted with semitic ideas, semitic usury, nigger violence, and beaner crime. Without goat fucking or Sharia law too.

        Is that so much to ask?

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        That would be covered under prohibitions on bestiality, I believe. Which is why we’re not supposed to m4rry unbaptized women either, come to think of it.

        Like

  48. I love “strumpet”, “slattern”, and especially “trollop”. They are quaint and unlikely to be understand and so in a subtle manner negs the recipient’s intelligence AND I love the observed or imagined trigger when googled.

    Liked by 1 person

  49. ArisEtFocis says:

    You forgot to add “nigger”

    Like

  50. Lovekraft says:

    Thought of another one: CHECKERS

    Derived from the Twitter blue verification checkmark, which is basically an indicator one submits to twitter’s agenda. Checkers also relates to the 4d chess concept, showing them as being too short for the ride. It also has a derogatory aspect to it in that it reminds one of a name for someone’s cocker spaniel.

    Like

  51. vfm#7634 says:

    “Cosmopolitan” to refer to ((( ))). Stephen Miller got ree’d at for using this word when dissing the Zeroth Amendment — because it brought back memories when the Soviets called ((( )))s that.

    Like

    • Publius says:

      Meanwhile THE FUCKING JEW dogwhistles its herd all day. Jew dogwhistles naming the evil white man who has any racial awareness:

      Frightening
      Horrifying
      Terrifying

      Jew power dogwhistle: the “banks” should block gun sales.

      Liked by 2 people

      • oink says:

        …. and drive gun economy to cash transactions and/or underground. Thats gonna work so good!

        The IQs of these ((people)), especially the forecasting components must be obscene!

        Liked by 2 people

      • oink says:

        I mean look how good erecting a “wall of seperation” between police and school and manning law enforcement with fellow ((tribe-members)) turned out!

        Liked by 2 people

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Previous generations seem to have had superior planning skills.

        Like

    • plumpjack says:

      worth the time to read.

      Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      Civil War II in the FUSA will resemble Bosnia. We will have ethnic cleansing. The good news is blue enclaves are tightly concentrated and vulnerable to embargo. They would rely on moon crickets for muscle too. A better strategy might be to encourage migration as people generally have an upper threshold of about 48 hours of hard combat in cumulative terms before their effectiveness begins to break down. The sheer numbers involved in the US make a direct approach impractical.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Publius says:

        When?

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        That is a tough call. Everyday the rhetoric heats up though. Chris de Groot wrote a very good article on the subject at Taki’s that drew well over 800 comments, mostly in agreement. Much depends on the economy and the failure of the voting booth. Then there is the renewed possibility of war in Ukraine if they seek to make good on this legislation to retake the Eastern provinces by force if need be. My best guess would be 3 to 5 years.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        my best guess is 3 to 5 years

        Like

  52. Nothingman00 says:

    “Worthless faggot insect” is a personal favorite. “Shit eating cockroach” is another .

    Like

  53. Most deserving of impalement:

    “Gus Kenworthy‏Verified account
    @guskenworthy

    “So proud of all these people! Everybody here has worked so hard to make it to the Olympics and have the opportunity to walk in the closing ceremony! Well… Everyone except Ivanka. Honestly, tf is she doing here??…”

    Obviously a finocchio, you don’t even have to look that one up.

    And free style skiing is a sport? Real skiing sports require the pure objectivity of a clock.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Those aerial and other odd snowboard and skiing events were added merely so the US and Canada wouldn’t look so pathetic in the medal counts.

      I guess it’s a good thing if more and younger folks “got into” the Olympics, but ya gotta (((shake yo’ haid))) when some obvious stoner is standing there with a gold medal ’round his scrawny neck.

      Liked by 1 person

    • skorzecin150 says:

      Limey faggot.

      Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      If people didn’t talk about them here, I would have never even known they were on. They are nothing more than propaganda for Globalism now.

      Like

      • Publius says:

        This

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        They are nothing more than propaganda for Globalism now.

        Not the results…. which remain propaganda for Nordic supremacy. 😉

        But point taken, on the poz narrative across the board… n1gger commentators, overexposure and praise of what little n1gger accomplishment was to be found, and the commercials were laughable in how they featured shitskin after shitskin, as if every negro fambly in America were raptly watching the winter games.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I’m happy for Norway but as you say, the whole thing is no longer about sports.

        Like

  54. Lichthof says:

    Was thinking about this the other day

    English soccer fan culture reflected the society back then.
    And now I realize it was essential for a healthy tribe
    A goalkeeper Gordon West was rumoured to be a fag and Liverpool’s crowd in the 1960s would whistle at him. Before a game some fans ran onto the pitch and presented him with a handbag with ‘Honey West’ on it.
    George Best who bagged more Miss Worlds than we can dream of, was whistled at too because he had long hair.
    Thousands would sing ‘hey there Georgie Best…you’re a bigger queer than Gordon West’.

    Any black players which were rare would be greeted with monkey noises, bananas and ‘Coco Pops’ chants. Fans would wear monkey masks.
    This was an all male bastian so if any women were in the stadium (say medical personnel) everyone would chant ‘goose…goose’ (i.e. she’s ready to be stuffed).
    Sluts were shamed. One slut model Mandy Smith dated several footballers so thousands sang ‘if you all shagged Mandy Smith..clap your hands’.
    Liverpool was a tough culture and any outsiders from the city were also mocked even stabbed.
    If you were on a dry patch you were considered a ‘wanker’ i.e. a masturbator. A long dry spell and you were ridiculed and even considered gay (which was the worst slur).
    So you had to have top game.

    All of this was essential to maintain a healthy white local tribe.
    Of course the shitlibs broke it all up in the pc 1990s.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Vagina dominator says:

      Up until the mid 60s they didn’t even commonly call it “football” as is enforced today – the globalist word. It was called “Soccer” – being a shortening of Association football.

      Liked by 1 person

    • skorzecin150 says:

      And now these northern english faggots chant the following for their new muslim hero:

      “Mo Salah-la la la la la. If he’s good enough for you, he’s good enough for me.

      “If he scores another few then I’ll be a Muslim too.

      “If he’s good enough for you, he’s good enough for me.

      “Sitting in a mosque, that’s where I wanna be.

      “Mo Salah-la la la la la.”

      Like

      • Lichthof says:

        Yep I posted a video of that on here the other week. And we have Manchester fans singing about a black players cock.
        Sheep following a corporate pc product.

        Maybe its nostalgia but I don’t think fans were like that up until the 1990s.
        If anything they were vagabonds. I remember a tv company tried to get a crowd to sing something for the opening titles and all they got were ‘V’ signs and ‘fuck off’.
        A tv presenter would be greeted with thousands singing ‘oh well hang..X X from the roof..by his balls’.
        Who can forget the classic

        5-4-3-2-1
        Pull that trigger…shoot that n*gger
        5-4-3-2-1

        Like

      • Lichthof says:

        Not to turn this into a soccer blog but soccer is a perfect microcosm of what has happened in the West.
        Up to the 1990s it was white tribal and very masculine. Alpha males abound. Just look at the old pictures.

        In the 1990s the foreign players started coming in on the back of the Bosman ruling, diluting the teams. Now it’s a brown and black invasion and not only do they desecrate the club teams but even the national teams now too. Germany this summer in the world cup could have a Turkish midfield. And these players do not even sing the anthem. France will have 3 ethnic French Europeans if we’re lucky out of the 11.
        The England youth teams are majority Nigerian.
        And these players before a lot of games will hold ‘no to racism’ sins and the captains will give a speech against racism.
        The old hardcore fans have been priced out so we have this global middle class beta soyboy sheep as fans along with women who love the game all of a sudden.
        And the actual game itself has become a feminized almost non contact sport. The players and coaches look like faggots and the aggression has been completely taken out of it.

        Like

  55. BRUH says:

    LOL NON STOP WHININ ON YO BLOG HAINT MASCULINE BREH

    ONLY CHANGE YALL BRINGIN ON IS YO ADOPTION OF TYPE 2 DIABITES

    [CH: WHY U ALWAYS WHININ ABOUT THE WHININ BREH?]

    Like

  56. Cecil Henry says:

    Don’t forget about the term ‘bastard’.

    Also very accurate and concise. And triggering

    Like

  57. oink says:

    “barren”
    “childless”
    “sterile”

    Liked by 1 person

    • oink says:

      “grotesque”

      The grotesque show of parkland teens regaling in their 15 minutes of fame atop their peers’ still warm corpses

      Liked by 1 person

    • oink says:

      “grotesque”

      The grotesque show of parkland teens regaling in their 15 minutes of fame atop their peers’ still warm corpses

      Liked by 2 people

  58. Mean Mr. Mustard says:

    My snark word of choice of late has been; parasite or parasites.

    Liked by 1 person

  59. Libertardian says:

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/25/mainstream-media-trump-victorious-economic-nationalist-takeover-complete/

    As someone on MPC said, this (CPAC) is the same gathering from which Ann Coulter was banished in 2015 because “Adios, America” offended the respectable losers. Now it has Never Trumpers being booed down, Marion Le Pen stating that the French want their country back, and Trump reading “The Snake”. Tired yet?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Libertardian says:

      The American Conservative, in 2004: ‘Bush has behaved like a caricature of what a right-wing president is supposed to be, and his continuation in office will discredit any sort of conservatism for generations. The launching of an invasion against a country that posed no threat to the U.S., the doling out of war profits and concessions to politically favored corporations, the financing of the war by ballooning the deficit to be passed on to the nation’s children, the ceaseless drive to cut taxes for those outside the middle class and working poor: it is as if Bush sought to resurrect every false 1960s-era left-wing cliché about predatory imperialism and turn it into administration policy. Add to this his nation-breaking immigration proposal—Bush has laid out a mad scheme to import immigrants to fill any job where the wage is so low that an American can’t be found to do it—and you have a presidency that combines imperialist Right and open-borders Left in a uniquely noxious cocktail.’

      Breitbart today: ‘During the weekly show The McLaughlin Group, Buchanan—a pioneer of the economic nationalist movement—said the war within the “conservative movement” was “over,” saying President Trump’s agenda of economic nationalism has finally beat out decades of free trade, open borders, and global interventionist dogma favored by the Republican establishment and neoconservative wing of the party.’

      Just call it the ‘treason wing.’

      Liked by 1 person

  60. Rafter Man says:

    I can’t believe nobody mentioned “spooks” to describe our coon friends. That’s from where they are actually somewhat better behaved, unlike those mouthy, banjo lipped primates from up North.

    Like

  61. demono says:

    i remember when they used to admonish us for calling poor countries 3rd world. “they’re developing nations. it’s offensive to refer to them as 3rd world.” I assume the fad died down on its own once shitlibs started travelling to said countries and noticed there’s nothing developing in there, only pure, unadulterated corruption, perversion and filth. Now people are getting more and more comfortable calling them shitholes. I wonder what will come next.

    Liked by 2 people

  62. Regular John says:

    Collaborator, traitor and sellout for anti-white whites.

    Liked by 1 person

  63. The Mother of all Terms of Impalement…

    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .

    jew

    Liked by 1 person

    • And “jewess” for their females.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Major7 says:

        Remember the Chappelle Show sketch “The Niggar Family?” It was basically an excuse to see how many nigger jokes he could cram into a sketch (a worthy endeavor), and at the end he got to throw in a few Spik jokes. One thing struck me as odd, though. The last gag was “Wait til I tell the Jews!” Not kike or schlomo or hymie, just “Jews.” I thought “what’s so offensive about the word “Jews?”

        Now I know.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        No one watches that uppity n1gger ’round chere…

        .. ‘cept you.

        When youze usual South Park renegades were all raving about how funny he was, I tuned into one show, and saw a mouthy spade who, for every soft jab he tossed at his own people, gave the business roundly to YT, always working in all the “good” n1gger stereotypes and cuck neener-neeners.

        Just another style of n1gger worship and cuck fetishery, watching the likes of him.

        Don’t give him legs ’round chere, alt-R ally… this is why we lose.

        Like

      • Major7 says:

        I had a feeling I was gonna get hammered for mentioning Chappelle.

        Ok, look, it was a long time ago, and I was a normie back then, and I was drunk, and somebody else was watching it and I just happened to be in the room, and then I yelled nigger as loud as I could, smashed the tv and joined the League of the South.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        And you didn’t inhale.

        Like

  64. Tam says:

    Ghetto hussy

    Like

  65. Major7 says:

    I’d like to have a separate category for fag insults, and call it Terms of Enrearment.

    Like

  66. Publius says:

    Rush is covering what Capn Obvious highlighted immediately re: Broward interlocal agreement signed by jews and the affirmative action superintendent to not arrest minority criminals. He reads here.

    Like

  67. baked georgia says:

    CH, what’s your take on prostitution? it should be legal or nah? pros/cons

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Ach, yet another libertarian with a played debate topic?

      Aside from the fantasy world of high-class call girls, does prostitution in its usual street life “certain sections of the city” manifestation seem glamorous or “providing a much-needed service”?

      No?

      Does it “keep the lid” on anything?

      Or does it just prove yet another human quagmire of abuse, drugs, and general depravity?

      There’s your answer..

      Like

      • baked georgia says:

        I’m not a libertarian. in many ways I’m a reverse libertarian…

        well, I forget to put in the previous post: not so much the legality of it, but it’s effects on society, to both men and women. how the easily available sex (even if paid) can meant changes, for beta males especially.

        the law aspect of the thing, is very interessing how in the 90’s the most “progressive” thing was the german/dutch position of “legal but regulated” but now the most “liberal” position is the swedish law, the punishes the men who look for prostitution, but not the prostitute. even france changed their law to resemble sweden. to me this is just one more chapter into the anti-male culture that we have, even if i’m skeptical of prostitution

        Like

    • plumpjack says:

      bro, with all due respect, you’re gonna have to scratch a bit more beneath the surface if you want to get at the meaty truth.

      let me get you started on the right path:

      1. define “legal” (i.e., who’s laws?, who does the enforcing? who gets a pass? what are the penalities? (strict vs. slap on the wrist?))
      2. define “prostitution” (i.e. what differentiates prostitution from de facto female behavior (exchange of sex for resources) 24/7 since the Big Bang?)

      I’ll refine your question further: what TYPE of prostitution is most favorable to our interests?

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      There’s a lot of free cooze out there already, I can’t grog someone payin’ for it…

      And no matter how “high class” the call girl might be, just the idea that she’s been plowed more than Old McDonald’s south 40, and gagged more than a bank teller in Somalia, should give one the heebie-jeebies.

      Liked by 1 person

  68. vfm#7634 says:

    Discussion topic for C H and the rest of the group:

    On the phenomenon of weight changes in girls when they monkey-branch (swing from one guy to another). IOW, weight gain as they lose interest in the bf, followed by weight loss when they set their cap for someone else.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      weight gain as they lose interest in the bf, followed by weight loss when they set their cap for someone else.

      Although we’ve all seen indisputable evidence of the former, I would venture not many coozie-thots even bother anymore with the effort of the latter…. they’re all, to a gal, “beautiful and amazing” just as they are, amirite?

      And shame on any toxic male who dares say otherwise.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Weight loss in an LTR/marriage always means one of two things:

        1) The partner losing the weight has cancer, or

        2) The partner losing the weight wants to get back on “The Market”.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Are you m-a-r-r-i-e-d, Cap’n?

        Sometimes the weight loss is a midlife crisis/trying to recapture youth/health situation… seen in it friends and family several times.

        Also, when someone retires from a white collar job and suddenly starts moving during the day again, with gardening, fixing up the house and property, starting a health exercise program, whatever, it’s not unusual to see one partner drop some decent weight.

        Youze yeggs are always either/or’ing a situation, and the world just isn’t like that… not often, at least.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        “Youze yeggs are always either/or’ing a situation, and the world just isn’t like that… not often, at least.”

        I’ve been thinking lately that we need a new altR self-policing term that calls out over-simplification/reduction fallacy tendencies. it’s a thing, and I’d say it’s no less dangerous than any other self-flattering delusion.

        we’re going to have to set ourselves apart by being more rigorous in our analyses of problems. ie, more WHITE.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        GE, I’m speaking statistically.

        99% of all partner weight-losses are gonna be either cancer or the desire to return to “The Market”. If you wanna obsess about the 1%, then have at it.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Cap’n, if it were truly the rare exception rather than the rule, I wouldn’t have gainsaid you.

        But you’re wrong in this case, the weight loss examples I gave are not merely that small a percentage.

        And besides, how is anyone going to prove the numbers?

        On a side note, what’s this bullshit Alinksy “obsess” talk? You been hanging around too many JIDF trainees lately?

        Plumpjack makes an excellent point (as usual) about us self-policing our binary thought processes… and let me add, as well as playing into the debate tactic frame of our foes, which gives THEM legitimacy and makes us look like parroting weak-sister Cyberian debate wannabes.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Hell, ghey mod strikes again… let me just say, what are these “statistics” of which you speak?

        I’m willing to bet any polls taken on “why did you lose your weight” would show the reasons I gave as the majority situation.

        And what’s this “obsess” Alinsky bullshit, alt-R ally?

        Plumpj@ack makes a fine point about us needing to self-police these binary thought processes… as well as using tired JIDF tactics in our own arguments.

        As he so eloquently put it, how’s about we all act more WHITE?

        Liked by 1 person

      • vfm#7634 says:

        “midlife crisis”? “retires from a white collar job”?

        Greg, it looks like the situations your posing are more applicable to older people in their 40s+, not young people trying to settle on a mate.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Perhaps, but Cap’n mentioned LTR/marriage.

        And these days, dumbass Millennials are thinking mid-30s as midlife, amirite?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I’ve been thinking lately that we need a new altR self-policing term that calls out over-simplification/reduction fallacy tendencies. it’s a thing, and I’d say it’s no less dangerous than any other self-flattering delusion.

        we’re going to have to set ourselves apart by being more rigorous in our analyses of problems. ie, more WHITE.

        COTW

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        thanks, GE.

        we’re all guilty of it. I’m thinking getting guys to use their brain cells so they can tackle these complex problems we’re facing should be right up there showing them how not to be betas.

        official term is “causal reductionism”. what a mouthful. maybe if enough people start noticing it as a thing an acronym will emerge.

        Liked by 2 people

    • Major7 says:

      I know one gal, was kinda pudgy when she got divorced, but she’d been that way for years. After the divorce, joined Cross Fit and slaved at it, 6 months later she never looked better. Ended up marrying a loser and now her body’s gone to shit again.

      Like

      • SteveRogers42 says:

        Yup. Wives don’t get in shape for the man they got, they get in shape for the man they wanna get.

        But the true DefCon 1 is when a marr!ed woman gets a boob job…

        Like

    • Yep, saw the weight loss dynamic for years in friends, colleagues, and patients before/during the return to market but here in the DC area the “beautiful and amazing” liberal pussyhatters don’t bother anymore.

      Like

  69. Baron Julius Evola says:

    Two good ones for the shitlib era.
    Gas the pitbulls, breed war now! Also,
    Delendam esse pitbullium.

    Like

  70. Lichthof says:

    My area went shitlib/Hispanic in the recent elections and it’s not going back. Now property taxes are up 6% this year. 6%!!

    Pay up goyim or you are going to jail

    Like

  71. “Moon Cricket” is one of my favorites. It was a term coined by plantation families sitting on their porches in the evenings enjoying the night air, while the weird noise-making of negro slaves’ religious rites could be heard in the distance. The fragrance of magnolia, the tang of the julep, and the hoots of the moon crickets– now all gone, gone with the wind.

    Like

  72. james says:

    words can be a well-needed slap in the face.

    Like

  73. SteveRogers42 says:

    Some people you just can’t shame:

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion