Feed on
Posts
Comments

2007: From the CH post “She eats her peas one at a time“:

Does she have a large trashy tattoo anywhere near an erogenous zone?

Slut.

2017: From ¡SCIENCE!:

We collect numerous measures of time preferences and impulsivity of tattooed and non-tattooed subjects and find broad-ranging and robust evidence that those with tattoos, especially visible ones, are more short-sighted and impulsive than the non-tattooed.

Tattoos are therefore a slut tell, because sluts are short-sighted and impulsive. A girl who’s impulsive in one domain is sure as Bartholin’s life-giving lube to be impulsive in other domains. And the more visible her tattoo, the more likely that hipsteress you have your eye on will go up to your apartment on the first date, let you finger fuck her mouth, give you a blowjob, and then complain about feeling “uncomfortable” in a long-winded solipsistic article written for “The Babe” or whatever menstrual rag is the current pit stop for butthurt feminists lamenting their inability to be wined and dined like the chaste ladies they aren’t.

The ThotTat life trajectory:
age 18-25: slut tell. easy lay, bring condom
age 26-35: cuck tell. she’ll cheat, bring paternity test
age 36-45: crazy cat lady tell, bring deodorizer
age 46-: sexual worthlessness. who cares about her saggy tats?

Future tradvaj to repopulate the lands with remnant based Whites will have clear, unscarred skin from head to toe, and the LoveLord who undresses her unpolluted body will draw a breath as the beauty of her unbroken porcelain wrapping turns his bachelor pad into a bioluminescent breeding ground.

90 Responses to “The Tattooed Slut Is A Redundancy”

  1. Scary accurate.

    I’ve been fucking a 28 yo with a small tattoo. She’s married.

    I’ve been fucking a 39 yo with a small tattoo. She’s seriously depressed.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Jim says:

      I was coming down here to the comments to say something similar. I’ve got a 38 year old and a 32 year old in my rotation, both with tattoos and both married. And of the half dozen or so other women I’ve hooked up with on Tinder, all but two of them had tattoos. That old line from Wedding Crashers about “might as well be a bullseye” is the truth.

      Like

      • Lichthof says:

        Fucking wives is low beta and treacherous

        Like

      • HungarianPatriot says:

        Lichtof got his wife fucked

        Like

      • Scanman says:

        HP: “Lichtof got his wife fucked”

        Even if true… where’s the lie?

        100 years ago, many of these men would be shot or at least beaten half to death. Laws have changed for the worse. Accordingly, lesser men are willing to assume the lesser risk.

        It’s also woman-caliber treachery, especially if you know the husband. No real man behaves like a bitch.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      “I’ve been fucking a 28 yo with a small tattoo. She’s married.”

      Like

    • skorzecin150 says:

      TOP quality…….men. Mind you, the disgusting, probably disease ridden skanks, debasing their skin with graffiti, are probably great matches.

      TOP quality all around.

      Like

    • Enfant Terrible says:

      (((Robert Pee-More))) and his (((brethren))) throw in these type of remarks about some supposed real life situation, in a manner that makes it all seem casual and normal, as way to denigrate the goyim, and at the same time promote degeneracy.

      Like

  2. I guess we shouldn’t count our eggs before they hatch, but if all the data on Generation Zyklon is correct [“The Whitelash Is Coming”; January 14, 2018; by CH], then these s1uts might be the last of a dying breed.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Captain Obvious says:

      age 18-25: Clinton; born circa 1993-2000; catches the beginning of Generation Zyklon

      age 26-35: Reagan/Bush-41; born circa 1983-1992

      age 36-45: Nixon/Ford/Carter/Reagan; born circa 1973-1982

      1973: Roe -v- Wade

      age 46-: Nixon; born circa XXXX-1972

      1965: Griswold -v- Connecticut

      Like

    • syonredux says:

      The girls in my crimethink study group are all between 18 and 22, and none of them have tattoos. Furthermore, they all take great pride in not getting suntans.

      Liked by 1 person

      • ultimathule1 says:

        Damn, that’s good to know!

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Crossing my fingers here, and hoping not to jinx us, but from my observations at the swimming pool, I’d say that we hit Peak Tat circa 2013/2014, and there’s been a noticeable decline since then.

        Like

      • Anonymous says:

        I am at a large top tier us university on the west coast and I can verify. Less 90s/00s deep tans, more pale to slight blush from the sun for most, a little golden for the beach crowd. Also, less promiscuity than a decade ago when I was first around a place like this, more focus on relationships and MRS degree shopping. Their single moms and older sisters are overworked, underloved, and loud about it; they want to avoid that at all costs. Some tryhard striver gogrrls in STEM, mostly high T foreign or from single moms/broken homes, and unfortunately the quickest to resort to doing “WHATEVER it takes…” as I’ve been told more than a few times.

        Like

      • Exurban says:

        …I’d say that we hit Peak Tat circa 2013/2014…

        It seems to me that tats peaked about five years ago around here (pacific Northwest) and now they’re down somewhat among the young. No hard data though.

        Like

  3. I live in a city that has a horrid tattoo epidemic, especially among young women. Christ Almighty, it never fails — I go to a coffee shop and the beautiful 20 year old behind the counter has BOTH ARMS completely covered. It’s so unbelievably maddening. Youth is beautiful all by itself. Why sully it?

    The likelihood of any female in my neighborhood NOT having a tat is very, very low. I have a revulsion to them and, honestly, whenever I notice one on a young woman (even if it’s relatively discreet), my heart sinks. It’s an odd feeling of disappointment.

    Why is that?

    Maybe because even a discreet tat is a reminder that other men have likely been with her already. It’s akin to people reaching for a stack of newspapers/magazines and grabbing the one under the one on top. The one on top has already been befouled.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Passerby says:

      Guéguen interprets the results from an evolutionary perspective. Like cosmetics or clothing, some women may adorn tattoos as a way to enhance their appeal to men and, in turn, to attract more males. A woman has a better chance of choosing a mate of “higher quality,” the thinking goes, when there are more from which to choose. Tattoos may then serve as an effective means to capture male attention. Along similar evolutionary lines, men are driven to mate with many women in order to spread their genes. Logic then dictates that they will pursue women who display more sexual receptivity. Again, like cosmetics and clothing, men may see tattoos as advertising greater interest in sex on the part of women.

      https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-games/201305/how-do-people-view-women-tattoos

      Liked by 1 person

      • Quaid says:

        No. Look at nature – its the males of a species that are colorfully adorned. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck – then it’s a slut.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        How does “Guéguen” interpret the results from the point of view of epidemiology & communicable disease theory?

        Like

      • Sparks says:

        No it’s classic projection. Slut sees hot guys with tattoos, thinks ‘women and men are the same’ so she covers herself in tattoos to try to attract hot guy’s attention. This is the same reason why women think men are turned on by credentials like college degrees.

        Tattoos are utterly disgusting. There is nothing more stimulating to me than porcelain-like, unsullied white female flesh. Why would you want to ruin it?

        Liked by 3 people

      • Quaid says:

        CO – Gotta say Brother, Your clip are gallery is very disturbing

        Liked by 2 people

      • Passerby says:

        Nope, humans are different than other species, among humans it is women who try to be more colourful. See a hall full of boring black male suites and colourful female dresses. Compare female fashion and male fashion.

        In female humans, beauty and looks are far more important than in male humans.

        In the case of tats numerous research has found that men are more likely to hit on women with tats, so IMO Guéguen is correct and women use tats as an unconscious advertisment for promiscuity, impulsivity, adventure.

        Liked by 1 person

      • There’s some cultures (arguably the s***hole ones), that have tradituonal tattoos as part of women’s fashion. That’s completely different from modern Western women covering themselves with random, bizzare inkings.

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        “In the case of tats numerous research has found that men are more likely to hit on women with tats”

        For the same reason they solicit h00kers. Duh.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Oleaginous Outrager says:

        A woman has a better chance of choosing a mate of “higher quality,” the thinking goes, when there are more from which to choose.

        This is an assumption, not a fact. Preceding from an unsound premise results in inaccurate results.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Nads says:

      I have relatives who were in the marines and navy during WW2. What an anchor tattoo looks like after 30-40 years cured me of the desire for tattoos early in life.

      Like

    • rocko says:

      Lately, my local Starbucks has been employing girls with no tattoos, which is astounding. Not only that, they have actual pleasant attitudes and they even smile at you while they take your order. And you don’t even have to fear getting accused of “sexual harassment”. If only the feminists, the redneck trash and the spic cholas got the message…..

      Like

    • Lichthof says:

      I grew up in the 1980s during a heroin epidemic and people with tats were always sticking needles into themselves
      I associate tats with bad health, aids…etc

      Like

  4. […] The Tattooed Slut Is A Redundancy […]

    Like

  5. gunslingergregi says:

    and these Tattooed Slut’s been robbing me lately cause they know I won’t beat the shit out of them. Bitches tend to die after they do that so it kind of has me worried some.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Passerby says:

    There are several studies that found that tattooed women are more promiscuos.

    Science says:

    Being tattooed is associated with greater numbers of lifetime sexual partners (Heywood 2012), earlier sexual initiation (Guéguen 2012, Nowosielski 2012), higher frequency of sexual intercourse and increased preference for oral sex (Nowosielski 2012). In adolescents, tattoos also correlate with the likelihood of having unprotected sex (Yen, 2012), but not in adults (Nowosielski 2012). Being tattoed is also associated with greater alcohol consumption (Guéguen 2012)

    Like

    • Quaid says:

      I’ve never seen a picture, even a fine art masterpiece, that I’d want to look at for the rest of my life … but I’ve seen many beautiful women whom i’d gladly have – even post wall when those laugh lines and strech marks around her vag are a comforting personal reminder – like creased bed sheets the morning after.

      Something very sordid about climbing into an unmade bed – especially if you weren’t the last one sleeping in it.

      Like

  7. Survivorman says:

    Tattoos on an otherwise physically attractive woman are like bumper stickers on a Ferrari.. trashy and inappropriate. It’s a real boner-killer for me.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. Jaded Jurist says:

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Jaded Jurist says:

    Tried to post this but it got eaten by WordPress. Even the algorithms know to stay away from this type of chick:

    Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      That broad is also overweight. And I don’t know how I know.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Tam the Bam says:

        Excess backfat, only good for adding to sausages. No hint of sacral bones, in fact of any bones at all, or separate cheeks, never mind the two little dimples … Irene the Boneless.

        Liked by 2 people

      • rocko says:

        I’m surprised there’s no telltale fupa or stretch marks.

        Like

    • Steamship Trooper says:

      Second worst tattoo I have seen. First was on a 25YO blonde/blue barmaid. Same location, “SANTIAGO” in Gothic script. “Your boyfriend?” “No, my son”

      Who in the hell would need to get a tattoo to remember their child’s name, and put it in a location you cannot see? And who in the hell would want to see that during the obligatory dograiling? (well, me, for one, but I can close my eyes and think of England…)

      Like

  10. I think… I hope… We’ve reached peak tattoo. Women should never get tats, men should only get them if they’ve earned them.

    Liked by 3 people

  11. Enfant Terrible says:

    Tattoos look cool if you’re rock star, or a member of the Yakuza, otherwise, they’re just sheat try hard airheads, or losers do, because they think it makes them look cool. Lololololo!!!!!

    Liked by 3 people

  12. bigjohn33 says:

    I like the allusion to the Aziz Ansari incident. I thought it was really weird that she admitted she sucked his dick and then got “uncomfortable” when he tried to fuck her.

    Like

  13. vfm#7634 says:

    The old saying is “if she smokes she pokes.”

    Change it to “if she gets poked, she gets poked.”

    Like

  14. Sean Fielding says:

    Quite something to go back to that 2007 entry. The [XX] in the comments. The light-hearted tone. Oh youth!

    Like

  15. NothingMan00 says:

    A dermatologist once told me that if he offered tattoo removal services he could stop doing anything else. Lots of tat regret out there, apparently.

    Like

  16. Is there a post about probing for a girl’s sexual past without coming off as insecure?

    [CH: i know there’s a post on this specific topic somewhere in the CH archives. in the meantime, start with this classic:
    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/its-easy-to-identify-a-slut/
    and this:
    https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2007/10/29/signs-of-sluttiness/ ]

    Like

  17. syonredux says:

    The beauty of European flesh, unstained either by suntan or tattoo ink…..

    Liked by 4 people

    • Jaded Jurist says:

      Imagine blue ink messing up these clean lines. Travesty!

      Liked by 4 people

    • Cracker says:

      yeah, i don’t mind some tan lines once in awhile but overall, i agree that it’s stupid.

      it also shows serious negative effects later on.

      every gym rat girl who does the gym, tanning, nails, hair salon routine looks good for only a very short time.

      they always end up looking like raggedy alcoholic chain smokers when they get older. look ten years or older than their actual age

      Liked by 1 person

      • Anonymous says:

        I think the do spay-on tans now

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        Got to get adequate D3, one way or another, you have to have it. It regulates 100s of processes in the body.

        If you are trying to keep up your T and if not getting 20 minutes of sun a day or are not at least dosing with D3, you are limiting yourself severely and leaving yourself open to all kinds of health problems.

        Like

      • Cracker says:

        i don’t disagree with you about vitamin D. healthy for all of us to get outdoors and take in some sun. i make a point of getting outside any chance i get

        my problem is with tanning bed girls who do it way more than is needed to get the vitamin D we need. same goes for the gym dudes who are big on tanning.

        very few if any of them are doing it for health. it’s strictly vanity for most of them. then the majority end up with a weird sort of body dysmorphia that makes them see pale skin as unattractive and looking overbaked as good.

        they end up way overdone and it looks like hell. also as i said before, it takes a toll on their looks later on. all around a bad deal.

        Liked by 1 person

  18. Discard says:

    Nothing says “wannabe” like a tattoo.

    Liked by 1 person

  19. ultimathule1 says:

    Someday these tattooed whores will be wrinkled old crones in a nursing home, and the tattoos of their mindless youthful years will still be with them – the imagery of that in my mind’s eye fills me we with a sense of horror.

    Like

  20. So Hos says:

    With respect to Le Chateau, a good many of technology best slots I’ve had have been tattoo free, with minimal piercings. Granted, I’m younger than 30, and in the deep south, but it still should be noted. Don’t be fooled by porcelain skin gents, thots are in spy training nowadays.

    Like

  21. gunslingergregi says:

    I still like tattooed sluts though

    Like

  22. Anonymous says:

    ‘Nuff said:

    Like

  23. Oleaginous Outrager says:

    those with tattoos, especially visible ones, are more short-sighted and impulsive

    So, “water is wet” type news. I realize it’s nice to back-up from SCIENCE!, but anybody who doesn’t already understand this is too stupid to swayed by any means.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Steamship Trooper says:

    When and where I came from, only criminals, sailors and slaves had tattoos. I always ask “Which one are you?” Never fails to get a response.

    Like

  25. rocko says:

    Coincidentally, the same chicks getting ink are the same chicks adopting pitbulls under the #notbaddogsbadowners hash tag, they bang either minorities or the most deplorable looking men inside their own race, aka cholos or Juggalos, and can’t keep their children in line. In my neck of the woods, they also tend to get jobs at the neighborhood gas station because their dumb scribble in their face has kept them from getting another type of job because, let’s face it, you ARE impulsive if you ruin your face by scribbling stars all over your forehead. I definitely wouldn’t want you to do tasks for me, like cooking a fine meal, filing my taxes, or administering a vaccine.

    Like

  26. Mean Mr. Mustard says:

    I have said it in Heartiste before.
    Tattoos are a slut tell.
    Piercings; particularly nose piercings are a c*nt tell.

    Like

  27. If that “tradvaj” mentioned in the last paragraph is really “trad”, she won’t have sex in any “bachelor pad”; only on her honeymoon. (Cute fantasy, though.)

    Like

  28. plumpjack says:

    trying to think of a decent white sharia neg for a tattooed skank…

    “ooh…..t-a-t-t-o-o-s. reminds me of my mom. she loves looking at old newspapers.”

    “so what’s it like having old comic book pages for skin?”

    “has anyone ever mistaken you for a used newspaper and tried to throw you into the recycling bin?”

    Like

  29. DavidS says:


    I’m still waiting for these results to come out, because I assume from reading the paper you linked to, this isn’t the same study. These are slides from a conference where the material was discussed.

    Like

  30. There’s a tattoo place I walked by a few times a week, and the guys who give out flyers out front are always trying to get me to go in there. I finally said to one of them recently, “Look how pretty I am. Why would I get a tattoo?” and kept it moving. Seriously, why would I do that? Please.

    Like

  31. So she asks, “Which makes my ass look fatter? My Master’s in Women’s Studies, or my Tramp Stamp?” Ok, ok, they wouldn’t ask, but when I find out she has either, I leave, I just leave. Tatts are an absolute NO go anywhere, a chick has defiled herself to do tatts, pierce or die the hair blue-green-whatever. She’s defaced herself. She bared her skin and her BLOOD to a needle wielded by a stranger. Taking lots of dick into her is nothing. It’s a fail. A woman has FAILED if she did any of this.

    Add in, if a chick is willing to do that shit to herself, anything she wants to do to YOU, in her mind, would be small potatoes. Ask John Wayne Bobbit..

    Like

  32. Heinz Getwellvet says:

    Any advice on dissuading a chick from getting a tatt? The one I’m seeing claims she’s getting a really small one, but I’ve made it clear how I feel on them. The issue always tends to resurface, yet I feel it’s just a shit test.

    Like

Leave a Reply