Feed on
Posts
Comments

More Non Sequitur Game

Non Sequitur Game — a valuable Chateau addition to the pickup oeuvre —  is a tributary of text Game that, with minor adjustment, can be ported to IRL social interaction, with similar results: female intrigue and curiosity, two states of gine which necessarily precede sex.

Non sequitur game is mystery bait. An odd word or fragmented sentence is like an eight ball to her head hamster — the little rodent will snort it right up and spend the next hour spinning frantically trying to figure out what you were saying, or — *squeal with delight* — whether it was meant for another girl.

I’ve done the accidental non sequitur text to girls, and come to think of it they did text back immediately, asking me to clarify. It’s a superbly sneaky tactic to trick a girl to chase you.

Some other truncated non sequitur game examples:

“see you at”

“leaving” (this one will trigger her threat of loss anxiety)

“we’ll see”

“wow!”

“cocka”

A similar version of non sequitur game is reverse eavesdropping game (REG). This is where you send a text to a girl that has nothing to do with her and is clearly not meant for her, thus inducing her to “eavesdrop” on your putatively private conversation. The REG text should be constructed such that it hints at your high value and/or social proof. Something like “bring the chips and i’ll get the booze. it’s gonna be crazy.”

Reader Mutant Seven passes along another type of non sequitur game — the gibberish hamster pellet. Pay close attention to the girl’s reaction.

One, she replied. Two, she didn’t say no.

So you’re saying I have a chance!

M7 adds,

This one has had me laughing all weekend long. Chicks just don’t get non-sequiturs or absurdity. It doesn’t compute. It’s abstract. It doesn’t correlate with their mundane, pragmatic concerns.  But they have difficulty leaving it alone as well because it’s mysterious. It draws them in by its very indefiniteness, its portent of profundity. Wasn’t it you who discussed this as useful game technique?

Daddy gib gamies.

Non Sequitur Game benefits the man using it as well as the woman receiving it. If you are uncertain of a woman’s reaction to your solicitation, or if you are tongue-tied and can’t summon your characteristic wit to close the deal, then just dump an absurdity in the grill’s cuntbox. She’ll be hooked like a fish, and you buy yourself a little breathing room to regain your composure, confidence, and, most importantly, your INVISIBLE HAND OF SEDUCTION. The Chad non sequitur will ALWAYS be better than the try-hard, sweated-out Virgin reply. Bonus gamies: Nothing reinvigorates a flagging convo by opening new and untrammeled lines of communication quite like a bizarre or sneakily allusive non sequitur.

CH Maxim #59: The less it looks like you’re trying, the harder the girl will try to figure you out.

***

vanbrah comments,

I once texted a girl “thanks” then followed up with “oops wrong person” Four days later I go to pick her up from her house. Within the first five minutes she asks me who I was texting. I felt bad for her poor hamster. Poor thing must have been exhausted.

I guarantee that girl was thinking about vanbrah’s retraction text during all four of those days, and well into her four sleepless nights.

34 Responses to “More Non Sequitur Game”

  1. mad66mav says:

    ;P ~~~~<====8 still works

    Like

  2. Thanks for the game tips as always CH.

    Per Lindsey’s text, the snarky, hyperbolic way Millinniels talk has to be one of their most annoying generational peculiarities.

    Liked by 2 people

    • It really is annoying. The men all screech in an up pitched voice, so even the most mundane thing sounds like “so exciting!!!.” They all sound gay.

      On the other hand, for the cute women who do it (all of them) it’s a fun and easy thing to tease. Thanks, I didn’t realize paper cups were awesome. Usually gets a laugh.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        bad for dudes to be excitable because like you say, it makes them seem gay.

        it’s a feminine trait and there’s nothing wrong with an enthusiastic girl who gets excited about things easily.

        that’s actually a very good quality in a girl. usually means she a happy go lucky type who doesn’t require a lot external stimulation and work on your part to keep her entertained and happy.

        snarky hyperbolic girls are another story. key word…snark. i avoid them like the plague

        rule should be snark and calm for men
        sweet but energetic for women

        we suffer from a population that has it reversed

        Like

    • Cracker says:

      i agree. this a great game example for men to pay attention to. clearly effective

      but the girl’s response is a total turn off for me. i will never get used to girls dropping the f-bomb in casual conversation and will not tolerate it in my life. crude rude and a sure sign she’s a low quality girl.

      Liked by 2 people

  3. […] More Non Sequitur Game […]

    Like

  4. Batman says:

    I once had a girl text me “totes jeal”. I had no idea what it meant. I actually had to ask someone else.

    [CH: totally jealous. it’s embarrassing to admit i know this.]

    Liked by 2 people

    • Cracker says:

      totes has to be one of the worst ‘words’ to be used nowadays. i see and hear it from a lot of women and some men.

      another stupid one is when girls say ‘for reals’ as in… ‘is that for reals?’ ‘are you for reals?’

      they think using baby language like that is cute but all it does is show what dumb sheep they are. grown adults talking like middle schoolers. oh how far we have fallen.

      Liked by 2 people

      • strongwhitecock says:

        The overuse of the word “literal(ly)” really grinds my gears. Do you over-exaggerate everything you say (yes) so you feel the need to let us know when you are saying something completely factual? Of course not, overusing “literally” is another up-talking, dramatization of otherwise normal conversation.

        Liked by 1 person

  5. Quaid says:

    Did I leave my floaties on the boat?

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Batman says:

    [CH: totally jealous. it’s embarrassing to admit i know this.]

    Yep. I knew right there I wasn’t going to waste my time.

    Like

  7. Benson says:

    An unrelated text in a foreign language makes hamsters squirm.

    Like

  8. vanbrah says:

    I once texted a girl “thanks” then followed up with “oops wrong person” Four days later I go to pick her up from her house. Within the first five minutes she asks me who I was texting. I felt bad for her poor hamster. Poor thing must have been exhausted.

    Like

  9. jvo17 says:

    Chicks just don’t get non-sequiturs or absurdity. It doesn’t compute. It’s abstract.

    With the rare exception of the character Holly on “The Office,” who instantly went into comedic riffing with the absurd Michael.

    Like

  10. Nads says:

    This explains the charm of gunslingergregi….

    Liked by 2 people

  11. MikeatMikedotMike says:

    I tried the “Mommy Gib Milkies” with my daughter’s 21 year old softball coach when texting her about the next lesson.

    Now I have to find a new softball coach for my daughter. :/

    Liked by 3 people

  12. gunslingergregi says:

    been babytalking in relationships since the beginning but it only works with woman who like to fuck all day so there is that

    Like

  13. Tam the Bam says:

    That’s chan-talk by literal autists. Just needs an expertly-crafted, exquisitely shitty Paint cartoon of a retarded frog-boy slobbering and groping upwards.
    And yes, it is as funny as fuck, like most of their stuff.
    But I tend to take the /pol/tards at face value (if not shills), “always hide your power-level”, so would be wary of dropping that one in front of anyone likely to recognise it.
    Mainly because I would drop to instant incel gamma nahtzee status when I am in fact Norman Uebernorm, Central Mediocrity of the Normies. And I’d like it to stay that way, thank you very much.
    Those kids are purebred assholes. Trust me, I know, I’m a boomer.

    Liked by 1 person

  14. NothingMan00 says:

    I used to just send links to random wikipedia articles instead of responding to paragraphs of vaginal rambling.

    Liked by 1 person

  15. ultimathule1 says:

    Damn! This is brilliant! What I see here is harsh Darwinian selection in action.

    Liked by 1 person

  16. Moses says:

    CH Maxim #59: The less it looks like you’re trying, the harder the girl will try to figure you out.

    I got a lot of mileage from fewer words, simplifying spelling and dropping punctuation. Huge difference between:

    Are you free tonight?

    and

    free tonite

    Crappy punctuation and grammar are your friends in text game.

    Like

  17. Hawk says:

    “Next time, you do as ordered.”

    Wait 1 minute.

    “Disregard. Wrong number.”

    Makes her think about someone obeying you, including herself.

    Like

  18. Asylum says:

    I sent “sorry about your friend” to a girl.
    It was an honest error
    But wow, her voyeuristic hampster, drama hampster, narcissism hamster…the full triad, went into over drive

    Like

  19. This is such a great post, and so was the original.

    My Man Brain says, “She’ll like that you use proper English and have interesting things to say.”

    Wrong! It turns her off, and either bores her, makes her feel a little intimidated or signals you’re trying too hard.

    Of course, I generalize. I’ve met women and had relationships with a few who were very smart and seemed to appreciate intellectual dialogue (but in each case, the Hamster always reared its ugly head). Such women are the rare exception.

    I would also add that these sorts of non-sequiturs are effective because male communication tends to be very direct and not subtle. It’s natural for us to be direct, speak logically, expect the same from others. Women operate differently, of course, and they are naturally drawn to mystery, so a man who isn’t following the more predictable script is likely to gain her attention.

    I also think it is rare that a woman ever thinks, “This guy is a moron.” (Unless he can’t fix a flat tire.) We men think such things about both sexes probably frequently! The reason is that women simply lack the intellectual rigor that men possess, so appearing a little dumbed-down is nothing to fret over; it’s not something a woman notices or loses sleep over. I would argue they are in some ways more comfortable if a man lacks certain probing or inquisitive qualities of intellect.

    Like

Leave a Reply