I’ve been receiving an increasing frequency of emails from gaystream media whores soliciting this blog’s lordship for a roll in the clickbait hay. All of them, to date, have requested absolute privacy (the irony), so I won’t divulge details on threat of (((legal))) recriminations, but I can offer a general impression of what they’re asking. For instance, one media whore speaking on behalf of a well-known whoresite is part of a team putting together a piece of agitprop art on the manosphere and wanted CH’s scintillating contribution to the effort.
I’ve wondered for a few months how best to respond to these inquiries. So far, the CH policy has been to ignore and plow. No j/k, it’s been to ignore. Period. I never respond, partly because, what’s the use? I won’t persuade a shriek of shitlibs to accept in their hearts the Rude Word of the Chateau, and I certainly can’t expect to be treated fairly by these toads. More practically, I am very careful to guard my shadowy dimensions, and there is a risk, however muted through multiple proxies and TOR nodes, that a reply by me would be scoured for identifying info by a black ops team at Fusion GPS (stands for Grabbing Pussy Systems).
But the inquiries are getting more insistent and coming from bigger and bigger names. So I’m reconsidering my standard policy of ignoring them; perhaps for an upgrade to a “lol suck a dik” response? I have toyed with the idea of a conditional reply. That is, I set the ground rules and they swear by them in writing before I offer any penetrating insights of my tumescent wisdom.
For instance, we all know leftoid gutter filth can’t help litter their reporting of deplorable subjects with smear terms and baseless slander. One can’t hold a gun to reporters’ heads (yet) to demand honest and accurate journalism, but one can bind them to abide at least a rudimentary schedule of fair play. I believe two of the Original Shitposters, weev and Anglin, have a lot to say about this tactic when dealing with the globohomogenized media and their skypistry.
For instance, I would demand any reporter refrain from using the term “White supremacy” in any article about Chateau Heartiste, and if needed for context to substitute the term “White competency”. Similarly, they would be required by the CH Vajeena Convention rule 69, subsection 14.88, to replace the word “racist” with “totally rad race realist”. And “misogynist” would become “man who doesn’t bow and scrape before delusional feminist cunts”.
Any violations of the terms of agreement would result in an immediate public shaming and an army of weaponized autistes leaving pig entrails on the reporter’s super zip front door.
And, to punctuate my seriousness of intent, neither would the reporter be permitted to insert a disclaimer that contained the words “white supremacy”, “white supremacist”, “racist”, “misogynist” or other favored term of othering the leftoid equalism cuntsortium employs to maintain their icy grip on their quack Narrative.
I throw my quandary to the studio audience. What do you think is the best way forward to deal with slithery solicitations from Snakes and Merchants of Fake?
PS Vox Day has written about this topic: Don’t talk to the media.
Cool aloofness.
It tends to melt the panties of the pursuing whores.
LikeLiked by 1 person
CH: “What do you think is the best way forward to deal with slithery solicitations from Snakes and Merchants of Fake?”
A: Anal.
LikeLiked by 6 people
I think we need a poll on which reporterettes CH should b@ng.
Marshmallowhan McCain, Scat Timpf, Skinnedy, Kimberly Cockfoyle, etc.
I don’t really know anything about leftist chicks, except that me & Rachel Maddow would need to drink about two bottles of Chardonnay and I’d need to swallow five or ten viagra to get it up for that “interview”.
LikeLike
Almost didn’t recognize her since she cut the hair.
Just curious: how many thousands of images do you have archived, excluding the ones NSFW?
LikeLiked by 1 person
PRO-TIP: Record everything. Audio & Video. Even if you’re in a jurisdickshun like Maryland where you can’t record without the consent of the recorded party [cf Linda Tripp]. Just record it anyway.
Then poast the video, using a “.ru” site, like Edward Snowden, to avoid USA indecency laws.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“Just curious: how many thousands of images do you have archived, excluding the ones NSFW?”
The JIDF keeps throwing so many new initiatives at us that almost all of my images are old & tired by now.
Practically every day I have to try think of a new JIDF parody.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think we need a poll on which reporterettes CH should b@ng.
Andrea Tantaros, but she’s been MIA ever since Fox fired her.
LikeLike
Megyn Kelly is trans:
So yeah, she/he takes anal.
LikeLike
SRSLY.
CH should do this if and only if it’s a true female reporterette [no trannies] and only if she first sends him nude pics, and only if she agrees to a conversation with him over dinner & several bottles of wine [all video-taped & audio-taped, the tapes being the sole property of CH], where she picks up 100% of the tab, to include a 30% tip for the wait staff.
Then they can do the second half of the interview back in her bedroom.
Or on the hood of her car in the parking lot.
Or both.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Uh. IMO she looks far better as her everyday self (even short-haired).
Katie Pavlich is on TV sometimes so just have them send her over.
On a more serious note, obviously, run the hell away.
LikeLike
— Practically every day I have to try think of a new JIDF parody.
CO, your work is appreciated.
LikeLike
DO NOT TALK TO THE MEDIA!
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/06/dont-talk-to-media.html
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yes, VD has made that an ongoing point. Don’t talk to the media unless you have tested pro skill (which they do) or if you are promoting a commercial product. Reporters have no authority to negotiate terms.
You don’t need the media, they need you for filler and to play the narrative-patsy.
Congratulations, btw. The CH message is reaching everyone it needs to reach without their relying on their platforms.
LikeLiked by 4 people
They all read…
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/27/kellyanne-conway-blasts-staff-using-press-shiv-ribs
Shiv, analysis of alpha posture, etc.
They all are reading.
LikeLiked by 1 person
http://www.thisblogisdangerous.com/we-do-not-debate-with-the-left/
LikeLiked by 1 person
The mainstream media is dying. They are also the central means of social control by the Cathedral. There’s no other way that middle class parents in the suburbs would spontaneously decide that their 10 year old was “transgender” and have him start going around in dresses. I personally witnessed this while teaching a summer camp on computer programming.
Even books, no matter how fucked up and evil don’t have the power to Marshall armies of Pozbots to advance a series of “5 years plans” to slowly obliterate the West. A person needs to pick up a book and decide to read it. It’s classic “pull” media. The current deathmarch of our civilization is organized *almost entirely* by the drumbeats sounded out by “push” media (basically TV, magazines, and certain web empires like Google that have the power to foist their agenda on us while serving us something we need). They are literally the analogue of the battle drummers in old school armies and the generals always knew it was BAD when the drummer got shot.
So the drummer boy has been hit. Just let him lay there and bleed out.
In other words, Vox is right, don’t talk to them, not even a jolly “sukmuhdik”. There’s also something else. This whole thing could be a legal honeypot. They may agree to all sorts of terms, pinky swear and everything, and then deliberately violate them. When CH sues, his (((lawyers))) may beat the other ones like a frat pledge on hazing night but in the documents it’s real names and places only please. No court will hear a case from a Trolly McTrollerson of 123 Fake St.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you talk to them, make sure to tape the entire encounter and let them know you are recording.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m talking about that up above here. The Clintons tried to get the state of Maryland to go after Linda Tripp for recording (((Monica Jewinsky))), but eventually they dropped the prosecution because (((Jewinsky))) was not felt to be a credible witness.
Speaking of which, is everyone here aware that (((Bernie Sanders))) is such a cheap kleptomaniac jew motha-ph*cker that he steals his neighbor’s (((Washington Post)))???
(((Katherine Graham))) is gonna kick his filthy jew ass.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Recording the conversation, even with audio and video, means nothing. They’re simply out to hit you. Period.
You’re not the narrative. You’re the target of the 2 minutes of hate.
You don’t have their penetration. You don’t have their impressions. Nothing you do will counter their portrayal of CH as a rapist training racist bigot homophobe dickless enemy-of-all-right-thinking-bluepillers.
Know this now, and ignore. It’s the thing that will drive them more batshit crazy than any other tactic.
LikeLike
exactly. follow EGK’s example and troll them mercilessly, with YOUR narrative, not theirs.
LikeLike
schedule an interview then show up late and say “I only have five minutes”, then talk about your book before you split. send random people to be interviewed on your behalf. talk about real estate prices in Burundi. etc.
troll troll troll! redirect, redirect, redirect! these people are fair game, in every sense.
LikeLike
The only way recording the conversation might work is if you get your version out first, but most people, as Per points out, still don’t have the reach of the MSM, so even that won’t do a lot for you.
LikeLike
Yes. You gain nothing from cooperating with (((them))) in any way.
LikeLike
Hiero! Keep the Leemutes at bay!
LikeLike
Just give them permission to run or link your columns on their blogs. Oh, they don’t want that?
Then they can fuck off and go back to peeking in the window at us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
DO NOT RESPOND CH. The media requests are ruse, the (((Deep State))) itches to figure out fo’ realz if one of the heavyweight Trumpists (Steve Miller) is behind GBM Lolzzzzzes. Imagine da headlines:
“Trump’s Senior WH Advisor Slings Anti-Semitic Filth on Gutter Blog!”
LikeLike
Vox has responded to this very post.
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/07/dont-talk-to-media-ii.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+blogspot%2Fvoxpopoli+%28Vox+Popoli%29&source=delusiondamage.com
LikeLiked by 2 people
I think you should go with a variation on the “suck a dick” approach. Tell them you want pictures of all the females that work for them. If you think that any of them warrant an opportunity to showcase their “oral skills”, tell them, along with your other requirements, that you will consider giving them an interview if the female demonstrates adequate skill, but she has to agree to it and she has to swallow. Then you can slap her ass tell her she failed and use that as an excuse to blow off the interview.
LikeLiked by 1 person
With video & audio & then poast it to a “.ru” site.
LikeLike
Don’t forget to substitute the usual meaning of antisemite to “he who the jews hate”.
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘jew aware’
LikeLike
Woke goy
LikeLike
If you reply, be prepared to be doxed. Better to not reply.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“NEVER talk to the media” – Vox Day
LikeLike
Vox Day has written about this repeatedly – you can’t trust any deal you make with a reporter, it will just be ignored by the editors and publishers. Don’t talk to them, there’s not really any possible good outcome.
https://voxday.blogspot.co.uk/2017/06/dont-talk-to-media.html
LikeLiked by 5 people
A trap is a trap is a trap is a trap.
Regardless from how ‘high up’ the requests may be coming, there is N O W A Y the media will present anything that isn’t 100% approved (by them) in any light other than supremely negative.
Every once in a blue moon, they goof – because they’re about as far removed from actual reality as the tradcucks – but you can’t count on that 1 in a billion chance.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apart from that, we have to divest ourselves of this assumption that being covered by “the media” is worth something. Nevermind who’s writing the bullshit; who’s reading it, and what do they matter to what we want in life?
LikeLiked by 3 people
Someone else said that the legacy media are ded, they just don’t know it yet.
That’s pretty much also my view.
LikeLike
I voted to ‘co-operate’. This in no sense contradicts what you’ve said about these worthless shysters. But think of the readers, dear CH. We all acknowledge here that da wimminz are open to red pill persuasion provided they can be reached with nature’s truths. None better than yourself to do this.
And looking at it another way, what’s to lose? Being misrepresented by the presstitutes? Going to happen anyway.
LikeLike
sounds like a great job for sorcerygod to handle.
LikeLiked by 4 people
just refer all mediawhores to that autist. “talk to my spokesperson”.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Talk about easily amused.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Bravo PJ!
LikeLike
i can’t stop laughing at the thought of it. it would be an epic troll. weaponized altR autism to counter their shitlib autism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Just think of how much trouble they would have getting rid of him!
LikeLike
You’re giving that “Autiste” license to make stuff up about CH then if CH says it.
LikeLike
While it’s funny in theory, Carlos is right. In the real world, it would be an even bigger catastrophe, if possible, than CH himself giving the interview. Some crazy, goofy guy who will babble out ANYTHING with a bit of transparent prompting? They’d be salivating once they realized what they had.
LikeLike
“You’re giving that “Autiste” license to make stuff up about CH then if CH says it.”
that was exactly the point. since they’re going to twist everything CH says around to fit their narrative anyway, why not get them tied up in their own knots by wrapping them up with a complete rambling loon?
this is the internet. nobody knows what’s real and not real anyway, except when it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. (right, Greg?) and satire is a very effective way of spreading a message. oftentimes it’s even MORE effective than straight talk because it smokes out the side who has something to hide.
LikeLike
Like this…
LikeLike
Pissing laughing… Lolz.
LikeLike
Why is everyone still commenting?
Thread over, pj scorched the earth behind him.
LikeLike
bronze age pervert dealt with one such very recently
LikeLike
and it was indeed a variant of “go screw yo’self”
LikeLike
Reminds me of that Laci Green ‘awakening’. I commented that, before she’s allowed to speak for anything remotely resembling the alt-right, she has to undergo a grueling wilderness survival regimen (to flush out the toxins). She either comes out lean and mean, or the bears get her.
LikeLike
They need you.
You don’t need them.
So piss on them and ignore
LikeLike
why waste your breath on a dying corpse.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Don’t waste your time.
Whatever restrictions you impose, they are going to lie, agree, ignore them, and publish anyway.
If you could come up with some legally binding framework, there is no way that their (((publisher))) would agree to it.
Now, if you had a book to promote, that might change things.
Remember that journalists are masters of vanity-game, and are well versed in the wormtongued arts of getting their subjects to talk against their better interest.
If you want to get a taste of sweet media attention, do a podcast with a friendly outlet, like TRS or one of the manosphere sites.
LikeLike
Who was the shitlord that insisted that he would only be interviewed if the first word of the article was “nigger?” He triggered somebody in a college and then had fun.
Vox Day has a very good policy on media. Don’t. Ever. Seriously. They might lie to you, then put in all the newspeak shitlib babble anyway. They are planning on a hitpiece. Do as you own Rude Word suggests, and retail aloof. These are the girls(male or female) that you have banged(emotionally) and are crying on your blog’s porch. Ignore them. You have nothing to gain and plenty to lose. If you want lulz, post up the desperate requests for interview on Twatter for the rest of us to mock, or feed them to Operation Autism Storm and laugh.
Also, fuck their requests for privacy. Unless there is some law against it, publicize them and enjoy. They would have no compunction against doxxing you, so let them have it.
The Shadowed Knight
LikeLike
Ya, i wondered about that. Since when can someone email YOU and demand privacy of the email’s contents? Granted you can legally enforce almost anything with expensive enough lawyers
LikeLike
This is a great point.
My understanding is a confidentiality agreement is required between two parties before anything between them can be subject to legally enforceable confidentiality.
It’s the same reason all those email postscripts you see “The contents of this email are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email….” are bullshit.
If you tell me your secret but we have no confidentiality agreement (written or verbal) then I can post it to my blog and there’s nothing unlawful about it.
LikeLike
“The contents of this email are confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email…”
That’s right up there with “This is not a solicitation for prostitution. Money exchanged is for time and companionship only” on the “bullshit that means nothing legally” list.
LikeLike
Yes, it’s like a one-sided agreement to buy a car. If the local Chrysler dealership sends you a letter saying “if you read this, that constitutes an agreement that you’ve just bought X car for Y dollars, we expect your first payment in 2 weeks, bub,” a legal contract has NOT been created between you and Chrysler.
This is actually a similar level of absurdity. They’re just relying on people to see their ridiculous confidentiality demand and accept it without reflection. Pure trickery with no legal force, though it’s effective on the horribly law-abiding and rule-following white mind.
LikeLike
The point of a confidentiality statement in an email is not to create an enforceable contract, it is designed to prevent waiving a privilege that would exclude it as evidence should it be sent inadvertently to third parties. The intended party doesn’t want the smoking gun to be seen or heard by the jury.
(Trust me. I am a former prosecutor who has dealt with the admissibility of email content.)
LikeLike
“Also, fuck their requests for privacy. Unless there is some law against it, publicize them and enjoy.”
Agreed. If you didn’t agree to confidentiality, then there’s no contractual obligation to maintain confidence. As long as you redact email addresses and phone numbers (and maybe even names, if the person reaching out to you is a low-level flunky and not a public personality), and publish the emails without any misleading editing, there’s no invasion of privacy / “publication of private facts” claim.
If you tell a reporter something and they don’t agree to keep it “off the record” or “on background” — even if you request it — they have no ethical (haha) obligation not to print whatever you say and attribute it to you. Either those rules apply both ways, or they don’t apply at all.
LikeLike
CH,
do not give them anything.
maybe the one you would talk to would respect your demands, but then he would (will) leak some of your personal information to other media, this would snowball into two dozen journalist distorting, exaggerating and plain lying about you.
All sorts of false stories about you would circulate.
they would repeat them often enough that millions of libtards would believe it is true and they will repeat those false stories for years or decades.
Most liberals to this day believe Sarah Palin said she could see Russia from her kitchen window, she never said that, it was a Saturday Night Live sketch.
Rumors go around the world before truth has time to put its shoes on ( or something like that, said Mark Twain )
It is easier to convince people of something false than to convince them they have been deceived ( Twain again )
Libtards – which 95 % of journalists are – have no shame, no morals, they hit below the belt, they stab their own mother in the back, they make scorpions and snakes look friendly .
It is hard to win against that type of people.
Don’t give them anything.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Whatever you do, they’ll connect you to Russia.
LikeLiked by 2 people
ha! I’ll drink a shot of vodka to that!
LikeLike
[…] The Whores Of Pozzed Media Solicit Yours Truly […]
LikeLike
Whatever you do, don’t reply. DO. NOT. REPLY.
Your anonymity (coupled with your double barreled truth cannon) is what gives you your power. If you reply in any way/shape/form, you start the ball rolling on them being able to track IP’s, emails, etc. They’re trying to put a face to a name so they can being slandering you.
Let the shriekers shriek. That’s all they’re good at.
On an unrelated note:
Does anyone actually talk about this site to anyone they work with/any of their friends… aka, in real life? I haven’t… yet… but I get the feeling if I ask more hands would raise than I imagine. Probably just as many of them would be from women.
LikeLiked by 4 people
He’ll be perfectly fine if he uses burner phones & burner laptops & corresponds with them only from public wifi hotspots [wearing large sunglasses for the security cameras].
For the meet-up, however, he could use some bros in the van with the parabolic microphones & the telephoto lenses & the sn!per r!fles.
LikeLike
Yes. Absolutely. Have turned several friends on to CH. ITS great fun bc now we email each other with the latest gems.
LikeLike
i tell tons of people about this site. (seriously … I do)
LikeLike
I try to direct men to CH whenever I can. I sometimes wish the wording of articles was somewhat more palatable.
LikeLike
Calvin – Not this site, but I do occasionally run across some PUAs – who are exactly like I picture some of the posters here.
Mentioning various YouTube channels gets the occasional response.
LikeLike
this blog is among my top three I recommend to male blue pillers.
LikeLike
Don’t.
LikeLike
I’m one of the silent guys that never comments but loves reading…
I know eveyone has mentioned this already, but just to hammer it home early in the comments: Don’t succumb to hubris. Please, please, don’t make any contact with the media.
http://voxday.blogspot.com/2017/06/dont-talk-to-media.html
LikeLike
ignore them! look at they (cnn) tried to did with ramzpaul. without counting the tureating over the meme video scandal
LikeLike
The experience of others says that anytime a msm reporter promises something, it is a lie. They are out to defame us, pure and simple. They care nothing for truth, only stroking the egos of their horrible leftist masters. All news works this way, from CNN to John Oliver to BuzzFeed.
Any rhetorical concession you obtain will be swiftly memory holed once they obtain their one or two kill quotes they’re after. They care nothing for burning their reputation because they are creatures of pure short term thought.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Although press coverage can be very tempting, I urge you to continue to ignore them. The fact that so many are contacting you is proof, as someone pointed out above, that they need you. You most certainly do not need them.
Fuck the eskimo media.
LikeLike
“Fuck the eskimo media.”
SRSLY.
LikeLike
Engage a lawyer who you trust to keep your identity secret. Use said lawyer as a go-between.
LikeLike
I used to work for two of the biggest media companies — one a major daily newspaper and one a network.
My recommendation is to ignore. People’s quotes go through writers, then through editors, then through the copy desk. By the time it comes out and gets “re-contextualized,” you won’t recognize what you said. You can complain, but if they run a correction it’ll be in small print where no one can find it.
I also wouldn’t put it pass anyone in media to try and dox or out you, like CNN recently did with the kid who created the Trump/CNN meme. These people see themselves not as reporters but self-appointed moral authorities, so their motives are most likely not what they’ll claim to you. This is part of what drove me out of the business.
The only way to play the media game is to be someone like Milo, who enjoys having a bullhorn 24/7 or if you’re someone who has a product you need to promote. Otherwise, it’s not worth it.
LikeLike
weev method. 1 btc/hour or nothing.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It is like having a conversation with a pederast (of which I have done). It is not possible to make inroads into their opinions because the greater level of their understandings are formed by faulty DNA, and the act of speaking with them only legitimizes their opinions. All that you can aim to do is illuminate their clown show for others, but that is not going to happen when they control the medium on which it is delivered.
LikeLike
I can’t find the quote – it is in Mein Kampf – but Hitler made a similar comment about having any kind of discussion with a Jew. They never discussed anything in good faith or gave any credit to the points of the other side.
LikeLike
“lol suck a dik” is passe. Try “lol suck a ladydik. i hear u liek tranniz” instead.
LikeLike
You’d probably find a sympathetic audience in Tucker Carlson and any national publicity that could increase your traffic and expose pretty lies to a wider audience couldn’t hurt your mission – There no such as bad publicity as long as they spell your name right.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“There no such as bad publicity as long as they spell your name right.”
I imagine you have had some trouble with that.
LikeLike
lol
LikeLike
Listen to Vox Day.
LikeLike
I’m imagining all of standing up “no I’m CH”
LikeLike
NO! I AM CH!
LikeLike
What a great movie.
LikeLike
I am Bernie Shwartz!
LikeLike
I am Isadore Demsky!
LikeLike
I am Legend.
LikeLike
I am Negan.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Like in V for Vendetta when all the citizens start wearing those Guy Fawkes(sp?) masks.
Speaking of that movie… CH is basically steven fry’s character. Mauling the media one post at a time. Thing is, CH has the advantage of not having a face to his name.
LikeLike
Not entirely off topic…since twitter has banned CH,
[…] …Twitter.inc failed to attract more monthly users in the second quarter, spooking investors looking for evidence that the company is on a sustainable long-term growth path. The shares tumbled the most in nine months, even as quarterly revenue topped analysts’ projections…
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-07-27/twitter-s-revenue-tops-estimates-monthly-user-growth-evaporates
LikeLike
It’s a trap!
LikeLike
It’s a trap!
LikeLike
Ignore is easiest. But negotiating the publicity of approved quotes and descriptions would be the most fun. Reading their reaction to the terms of agreement re: disallowed lib smear words alone would be worth it.
Don’t want to get doxed? One solution: VPN + Hushmail, Hide My Ass, GuerillaMail, etc.
LikeLike
‘Hide My Ass’ has already doxed people – avoid.
LikeLike
If you use Burner Phones & Burner Laptops & Burner Credit Cards [all paid for in cash] & public wifi hotspots, then they can’t trace you.
LikeLike
J.D. Salinger that shit! Your legend will only grow.
LikeLike
it’s a stitch up obviously but no one here cares what the journos say. their audience isn’t going to be convinced either but that isn’t the point. the point is this place is a community of likeminded individuals, CH and reader alike, and I don’t really want to see this place inundated with clickbait riffraff viewers and journos looking to get something out of it which would happen if the media started to report on this place.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’ll know the place is dead if commenters start “signing off” on their own comments.
Vagina dominator
LikeLike
Good point. This is really just an old school online men’s’ club without the Whisky. Too much traffic would ruin it forever.
LikeLike
Whiskey used to comment here a while back.
LikeLike
I was thinking the stuff you drink
LikeLike
Barely ever comment, but– Ignore. They’ll break any deal and doxx you.
LikeLike
They are a dying media, desperately clinging to relevance.
Keep ignoring ´em like any other degenerate fat Judenhure.
LikeLike
Demand that Billy Bush be the co- interviewer, then talk about pussy the whole time.
LikeLiked by 2 people
is the media poz-whore beta-baiting the more prominent members of the militant alt-right?
LikeLike
Batman works in the shadows.
LikeLike
He merely embraced the darkness. I was raised by it. Molded by it….the shadows betray him because they belong to me!
LikeLike
Don’t interact in any way you can’t control. A pinky swear promise not to fuck with you isn’t control.
At most I’d give em brief statements that they can’t resist (lol, that’s out of your control) printing intact.
Birthday Cat and “8===>~~~” should work OK.
Or insist on only talking to a good looking young girl reporter, and then 100% blow off all the questions about politics and race. Just game the fuck out of her.
That’s a message they’ll transmit intact, if they transmit it at all.
LikeLike
“8===>~~~” is probably the best response to the interview request.
LikeLike
The main stream media is destroying itself with its group-think propaganda, don’t lend your name and reputation to it.
LikeLike
Ignore.
LikeLike
Ignore them.
There’s no way that talking them could work out to your advantage. They have an entire (((racial history))) of slimy backstabbers and hundreds of thousands of collective years of experience among their reporters, editors, etc. in twisting everything to match their frame.
Don’t do it, sir! Don’t do it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Imagine if you got as much publicity as possible through MSM, and then these charlatans went to Trump himself to ask his opinion of you. What would Trump say to them? I reckon a nonchalant “disavow.ok?idisaow.”
I concur with other commenters. Do not reply.
LikeLike
The point is to destroy them. They won’t help you destroy them no matter what you ask of them.
LikeLike
Goyim! You should talk to de media, yes! Clear your name goyim. Tell dem that you hate the blackensteins and de judens. Yes! Be careful to wear a white hood while you say these things ok?
LikeLike
http://www.thisblogisdangerous.com/journalists-are-the-enemy-and-must-be-stopped/
LikeLike
Not worth it. I think that’s part of the allure of this place – the anonymity and refusal to engage with those sacks of shit. Unless you’re of the opinion that there’s no such thing as bad publicity, but no reason to give them what they want.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh my children, you ignore the obvious!
Demand obscene amounts of cash up front, plus unrestricted copyright to the unedited version after 100 days. Then stride lordfully through the haranguing throng responding to each accusation “Yes, those are my words, quoted out-of-context. I got paid and I don’t care.”
LikeLike
You could always point (((them))) to dagbfm. LOLgzzzbbbblllssss….
LikeLike
Richard Spencer’s “Identitarian” is an awesome replace to “white nationalist” in my opinion.
But , I’d rather you gave them the “lol suck a dik” treatment. By the time your interview is published , no matter how great you were , they will have made you look like (literally) Hitler. That’s their only intention.
LikeLiked by 1 person
When they send you to makeup for the mustache, you should call time out.
LikeLike
My Most Serene Shitlord and Magister Ludi in Perpetuam: Don’t. Talk. To. The. Media.
Remember the scene at the very end of “Devil’s Advocate” in which Keanu Reeves, having just escaped eternal damnation by a whisker, on his wife’s advice (just as with Adam and Eve in Eden), agrees talk to a reporter (Al Pacino = Mr. Milton = Satan Himself). Pacino morphs back into his Mr. Milton persona and says, “Vanity! My favorite!” Next we hear the closing soundtrack, “Paint it Black” by the Rolling Stones.
Thus do I humbly repeat unto thee, My Lord: Don’t. Talk. To. The. Media.
LikeLike
Why would you give a thirsty (((traitor))) water?
If you must, demand that you have the right to release first
LikeLike
Either don’t talk to them at all, or use any encounter to make it clear they are not to be taken seriously……make fun of them.
LikeLike
They just want to destroy you. Tell ’em you’ll do a long in person interview with them but they have to commit suicide in the middle of it.
LikeLike
They fear you and the truth in your message. They’re only looking for a way to destroy you.
LikeLike
LikeLike
Why run away from “White supremacist” when you can A&A
LikeLike
say nothing but also release their info to /pol for the autists to run ops on them
LikeLike
As Curt Doolittle says, “Political discourse is pointless because people vote their genes.”
LikeLike
Do you want to move into a sort of business where all attention is good attention? For instance Alex Jones. If that’s not what you are interested in, then mainstream media will only do damage to you or enable others to do it. They will abide by no ground rules and their word spoken or written is worthless. A legal agreement is good so long as you are willing to spend more on lawyers than they are and by the time it is resolved their goal will be achieved. Recording them and shaming them later is only as good as who will listen to it. Their audience largely won’t and does not care. Very low upside possible with a huge downside risk. Their lawyers could go on the attack.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Ignore. A majority of the population would be repulsed by what you write.
Fuck ’em.
If people are looking for harsh truths, they will find this place on their own.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Far more people need to hear you than are doing so now.
The potential audience receptive to your message is many times higher than those reading here. And, as you repeat, the hour is very late.
If it’s truly them reaching out to you, they’re not doing it from a position of strength – they’re doing it in fear – it’s defensive. They already know their credibility and power is vanishing, by the day. An outright majority now know they lie and distort to push their agenda.
They’re going to make mistakes and miscalculations more and more frequently now, in desperation and anger.
I say take a chance, as carefully as you can. No great rush.
If they’re already contacting you, repeatedly, without having doxxed you, then why not continue that way? Open by reminding them of how low their status has become, and why(put them on the defensive).
‘You can’t be trusted, so what are my assurances? You demand confidentiality, but what are you offering in same? How do I even know you are who you say you are?’
(Toy with them a little – get them to post some secret signal on their website to verify they’re legit. Tell them to make it a frog.)
Keep a record, and post the transcript at the top of the site, so it’s the first thing all your new visitors see.
And so on.
It’s entirely possible they aren’t who they say they are, and are looking only to find you, so by all means, keep your guard up above all.
Lastly, if you do go down in flames, you’ve already done more than your share.
‘What would the God Emperor do?’
(and no, I’m not one of them)
LikeLiked by 1 person
Concur. CH is much much smarter than the media knaves, AND his message needs to read 10,000 times as many people. Proceed with caution. Stay alert.
Even a twisted, kooky article in the major media will spread CH’s underlying message, which any smart reader can ascertain by reading between the media lines and visiting this site, to a much bigger world that NEEDS to hear it.
LikeLike
You’re not going to outsmart these people in a channel they own. The reporters are just pawns, and the signal will be what the masters want or it won’t go out at all. Go around them and stay in our channels.
LikeLike
Naaah.
Treat them like the ugly girl with a bad attitude they are. Ignore….
Shitlord on.
LikeLike
Go for it. Get your message out. I don’t care what CuckDay says about media. Just post the unedited responses afterwards.
I think you’re aware of this already, but DS wanted you to write something.
LikeLike
Cuck Day? Hey idiot, direct your fire to the left.
LikeLike
The maul right is seeking to build parallel institutions. Talking to globohomo media inc creates a frame in which it appears you need or care about them. You’re getting your message out plemty, and there’ll be ample right wing outlets emerge to be your amplifier when that season soon arrives.
LikeLike
Seeking to build is not the same as built. He’s really not spreading the message outside of the alt-right echo chamber.
LikeLike
But it leaks out from there in whispered conversations in the hallway. That is the very best method of spreading news because it is in relieved agreement. To quote Jean Marie le Pen, we say what most people think.
LikeLike
I saw something the other day where Soros is paying people $15k to start an Antifas cell. This much heralded uprising has been delayed twice now. Methinks the thought of meeting real resistance has had big payoffs in terms of driving up the Left’s recruitment costs.
LikeLike
Best comment yet. I was actually leaning towards CH talking to the media, but you’re exactly right. We’re building our own institutions, so why drive in their lane. And plenty are finding CH on their own. They come for the game advice and stay for the real talk.
LikeLike
Scaramucci: Priebus is a ‘paranoid schizophrenic,’ will be asked to resign http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3572579/posts
LikeLike
Sonny Corleone will deal with the problem.
LikeLike
He letting strangers know what he thinks, though. 😉
LikeLike
Beating a dead horse here, but I wanted to add anyway,
Trump has 10,000 times more money than you do CH ( just guessing, I have no idea how much money CH has )
Trump is the president of the most powerful nation in the history of planet earth.
yet he is almost powerless to stop the media from lying 24/7 about him and redirecting the attention of the public towards his alleged ( but all false) wrongdoings… when there are mountains of evidence democrats are guilty of several crimes from voter fraud to selling Uranium to Russia in exchange for hundreds of million$$$.
Imagine what they can do to you.
Don’t give them anything.
not even in which state you live in.
nothing.
LikeLike
“…but one can bind them to abide at least a rudimentary schedule of fair play.”
LikeLike
Ignore.
Remember they could doxx us all.
LikeLike
This.
LikeLike
Well then let me be the John Hancock of the new Declaration of Independence.
Then can dox THIS. (((Sipowicz gesture)))
LikeLike
There can only be one reply CH…
LikeLiked by 2 people
They don’t know that little spoon doesn’t make the rules.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Bingo on the reply! Thread winner. Just tell the reporters in response:
“Little Spoon doesn’t make the rules.”
They’ll scratch their heads over it and it will build legendary cachet.
LikeLike
I wonder if FemX/Li’l-Spoon ever got knocked up?
The last I heard of her, she was being banged by that married dago wop piano tuner dude.
[CH: i think femx was the only legit autistic female i’ve ever come across. she did post a pic of her half nekkid bod once, and it was nice, so there’s that.]
LikeLike
I change my answer from don’t reply to this.
LikeLike
No.
LikeLike
Note the results CH. We can’t lose you to the jackbooted thugs.
LikeLike
Watch Bill Belicheck press conferences on Youtube over and over. Soon you can talk in a thousand conversations and come to no harm. Hat tip to Belichick and Sun Tzu.
LikeLike
Nice! Belicheck is great.
LikeLike
Roosh thought he could outwit the media by appearing on Dr. Oz. The producers straight up lied to him.
He was made into the object of 2 minutes of hate for the fatties and losers who watch the show.
Don’t do that.
LikeLike
They are trying to bait you with publicity so they can do a smear job on you. Don’t trust them, ever. You don’t need them.
As one commentator said, “Cool aloofness”.
LikeLike
“Thank you for your enquiry. There is nothing I might say in an interview that is not on my public website. If you wish to send me a list of questions, I will consider answering them there.”
LikeLiked by 1 person
An option would be to agree to appear on their show, outright flake, then troll mercilessly.
For more win, send in a homeless vet to reply in your stead. Pick one who is homeless because his wife divorced him and sued for child support for some other dude’s kid while he was deployed.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“What I want to do is I want to fucking kill all the leakers, and I want to get the president’s agenda on track so we can succeed for the American people,” Scaramucci said.
“Reince is a fucking paranoid schizophrenic, a paranoiac,” Scaramucci said. He channelled Priebus as he spoke: “ ‘Oh, Bill Shine is coming in. Let me leak the fucking thing and see if I can cock-block these people the way I cock-blocked Scaramucci for six months.’ ” (Priebus did not respond to a request for comment.)
LikeLike
There is another part
“I’m not Steve Bannon, I’m not trying to suck my own c—,” he said. “I’m not trying to build my own brand off the f—ing strength of the president. I’m here to serve the country.
—————————————————————————————————-
that asshole serving country
physiognomy is everything or almost
f*uck them all
LikeLike
LikeLike
This guy is me me me. As in, all he cares about his little shit 15 minutes of fame. Trump is obviously using this noob tool to do whatever it is he does with noob tools. Once again, Trump knows exactly what to do and when to do it. He’s been sent here by God as God’s anointed to answer the prayers of Americans.
LikeLike
This hothead dago clown won’t last a week.
You heard it here first.
What was Trump thinking?
Anthony Scaramucci uses vulgar language to lash out at Priebus, make fun of Bannon in interview – Fox News
https://apple.news/AAP6MNjG-QG6YRFSVOtFBYA
Hey Dago, you’re fit to do oil changes, spic. This is NOT how Trump does it.
LikeLike
They want their fleas to jump into him.
LikeLike
he’s a purposeful distraction while Trump is banning trannies from the military and the DOJ just declared that it’s perfectly fine for employers to discriminate against faggots.
the media’s heads are spinning trying to figure out which scandal to cover. and giddy over the possibility of discord in the house of Trump. he’s going for the jugular, while giving them a clown to keep them occupied.
even if he’s gone in a week, it was a good week for a loudmouth misdirection.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Straight from the Clinton playbook. Cover up negative publicity with more negative publicity. This is child’s play to P.T.
LikeLike
Re: Publius
This is why we lose
U fairy
LikeLike
Also, it’s “fungul”, very short for vaffanculo — or go fuck yourself in the ass.
It’s funny how you guys tut-tutted the left for tut-tutting Trump for “foul language” during the primary, and now you’re tut-tutting Scaramucci for the same thing.
As if no one here curses or anything. As if this weren’t a pick-up blog. Etc.
LikeLike
Ffangul.
LikeLike
For a few seconds – at first – I thought Scaramucci’s language was a bad thing, but considering how UNcivil the left and their media have been since Trump won the election, I think Scaramucci’s attitude is just the right thing.
playing nice and appeasing the evil left and their media has been tried for decades…it does not work, it simply does not work, it only makes the left and their media want more blood…..it is time to open the machine, put the pedal to the metal and crush them, pulverize them…the time for kid gloves is over.
With Scaramucci, heads are gonna roll ( figuratively of course, not ISIS style)…there will be people fired, some will be in front of a judge having to explain their acts, their treasonous acts, some will end up in jail.
He will be able to say what President Trump should not say ( but thinks )
If it takes a foul mouthed Scaramucci to have a serious inquiry, clean house, make the MSM feel worried, and one day see Hillary in jail, more power to Scaramucci!
The time for faggoty kid gloves is over
real men are back.
LikeLike
Yeah my own thoughts exactly my canuck friend. The Mooch does not screw around and tells it like it is.
Compare the physiogomy of the Mooch and Reince. Who do you trust?
LikeLike
Trump places personal connections above ideology. It’s that simple. He likely knows Mooch from way back, and has higher regard for someone who can tell you to go fuck yourself, even with the camera running, than anyone else. And remember, Trump wasn’t a Republican until recently; the important brand here isn’t Republican, but Trump.
Priebus is a career Republican (whom I don’t dislike), Bannon is a worm with shallow, if grandiloquent, Breitbart-tier ideological trimming. This isn’t surprising after a moment’s reflection: He was bound to start bringing his New York associates in.
But hey, it’s good to know you keyboard vanguards still hate Italians for absolutely no reason.
[CH: i like mooch but you’re wrong about rinse penis and bannon. the former is cucked to his heart, and the latter is a legit champion and believer in tacitly White nationalism. if trump were to cede his powers to anyone, i would hope it would be to bannon first, steve king second, and kris kobach third.]
LikeLike
To date, Bannon has done almost nothing to prove that he is anything of the sort beyond some rhetoric during the campaign.
[CH: i must have missed the president bannon part of this argument.]
Everyone wanted to believe he was some crusader but nothing has happened, and now Trump lets some blustering Eyetal through the door to take a few swipes at him. Meaning that he probably isn’t up to much, after all.
[mooch may or may not be off the mark in his assessment of bannon’s motives, but that doesn’t change the fact that bannon has said all the right things and is still very close to trump’s ear, potentially influencing the EGK every step of the way.]
I don’t think it’s controversial to say that WNs projected a lot onto Bannon.
[no projection necessary (and it’s a dead jidf trollboy giveaway when a commenter brings up WN unsolicited, just for the record.) bannon really does believe the things he says, and what he says really does align with reality more than any other current year ideology.]
The hard fact is that since he came out of the woodwork, we can credit nothing to Bannon beyond Breitbartisms and a brief foray into strident civic nationalism. Maybe he’ll prove you right one day; I hope so. For now, he isn’t making waves as far as I can tell.
[it’s funny how you dump so much responsibility for a perceived lack of progress in the trump admin on bannon, when anyone with the eyes to see knows that the entire corrupt establishment of both parties and the deep state have been working tirelessly to thwart trump at every turn. you try getting something done in that acidic environment.]
As for Priebus, he’s less of a cuck than Ryan.
[faint praise]
Remember, he wasn’t totally unfair to Trump during the primary, as everyone else was.
[as wormtongue, priebus is skilled in the art of fence straddling.]
This may have been due solely to his position, it may have been a sense that Trump’s was the strongest wagon to hitch to. Either way, there isn’t much hard evidence to convict him of Ryan or McCain-level treachery; which doesn’t mean he’s beyond it.
[if he is the primary leaker, he has to go back. and my bet is that mooch is right about preibus being the leaker.]
LikeLike
If it wasn’t obvious
ML is uh.
LikeLike
“[it’s funny how you dump so much responsibility for a perceived lack of progress in the trump admin on bannon, when anyone with the eyes to see knows that the entire corrupt establishment of both parties and the deep state have been working tirelessly to thwart trump at every turn. you try getting something done in that acidic environment.]”
No. I’m saying that Bannon was never that important to begin with. Also that we habitually overestimate the abilities of anyone in power. All the more if they happen to be making noises that we find amenable.
Well, it’s only six months in. There’s still time for Bannon to completely overturn the entire modern geopolitical paradigm and usher in our own personal utopia. Since he reads Evola at bedtime and all.
While I have the floor, let me go on record to predict that Zuckerberg, if he’s considering it, will throw his hat in the ring late ’17 / sometime ’18 to fill the Democratic power vacuum. If the DNC are stupid enough to go with Kemala Harris, Trump could very well take 2020. But if Zuckerberg gets in, it’s over for decades.
[CH: zuckerborg is an inhuman reptile who needs a team of PR agents to infuse him with normal human emotion. he’s not getting close to the WH.]
LikeLike
Bet.
LikeLike
Tell them they can quote your TED talk.
LikeLike
Ignore them like I ignore my wife when she is getting nervous about something trivial. She shuts down and gets horny when I do that. The media is the equivalent of a nervous woman. Ignore her and smirk and she will get hornier.
LikeLike
@CH
Lol, they’re just gonna blueball you. They won’t sign anything that their lawyers don’t approve and, if they break the agreement, they’ll delay any settlement in court. Make them earn your trust–don’t rely on some stupid contract that they sure as shit will violate. Start with a ten second sound bite and expand it as long as they abide by the rules. Even if they spread their legs and send you naughty pics, don’t believe them…deprive them of your attention if they misbehave…you know the drill.
LikeLike
give them nothing.
their word is a lie.
LikeLike
Political, economic and religious systems can be destroyed and resurrected but the death of a race is eternal.#WhiteGenocide #AltRight pic.twitter.com/KDF95C6vVb
— Ann Kelly (@LadyAodh) July 26, 2017
LikeLike
They’re trying to dox you. If they want to do a story on you all they have to do is read your stuff and then report on it. When I wrote a book report on Moby Dick, I didn’t need to interview Herman Melville to do it.
LikeLike
Indeed
LikeLike
I vote ignore them. Even with negotiated terminology, selective editing can paint a very misleading picture. There are very few people who can lock horns with the MSM and come out even, let alone on top.
LikeLike
I wonder which word triggered my mod rape
LikeLike
H.eartiste there is no way they can s.ue you for just d.ivulging the name of w.hoever contacted you. Just tell us (((w.ho))) contacted you? You can also p.ublish their e.mails if you want and they still cannot s.ue. There is no l.egal c.ontract between you or c.onfidentiality a.greement or even a p.resumption of p.rivacy because you are a p.rivate c.itizen and they contacted you.
LikeLike
^ this. We wanna know who.
LikeLike
They can still sue though… Require an answer or default, get subpoenas, file motions to compel testimony and document production etc.
They don’t need to sue to win damages they win by suing via doxxing…
LikeLike
Depending on what state CH is in, and whether it has an anti-SLAPP law. California and Texas anti-SLAPP laws (and maybe some other states, there are 28 in all plus D.C) put a hold on discovery until the motion is resolved, and provide for legal fees if the defendant wins the motion.
The motion is filed before the answer to the complaint. To win the motion, the defendant has to show that the lawsuit targets free speech on a matter of public interest — that shifts the burden to the plaintiff to establish a likelihood of success and to present evidence to establish every element of the cause of action. If the defendant fails to do that, the plaintiff wins, the lawsuit is dismissed, and the plaintiff gets a fee award.
LikeLike
You miss the point – to defend and win the lawsuit you have to answer and show up and be part of it…
LikeLike
Depends on how much you can convince them to pay liquidated damages for each and every breach of contract. If your loss of privacy is compensated by cash, how much is it worth to you?
Also, get a lawyer. Your lawyer can represent you and maintain your privacy (he’s forbidden from disclosing your identity due to attorney-client privilege), as well as make sure your contracts with these pukes won’t be riddled with pozzed loopholes that the layperson won’t recognize (not that you strike me as a layperson, but I still can’t put my finger on what your day job is–If you are a lawyer, you’ll know then that I speak well in advising that you get one).
LikeLike
Cernovich is a lawyer and probably why he decided to risk it because litigation was essentially free for him other than time. It worked in his favor anyway. An interview, even negative, would boost traffic bigly but most people are not ready for this site yet. I call net negative.
LikeLike
Oh.
Somebody with a clue.
LikeLike
They will lie to you. Agree to whatever you say, and then not do it (totally rad race realist was super funny btw).
I know these people CH. They are after power, NOT the truth. Power is more addictive than cocaine. You’re dealing with addicts.
They’ll have their interns scour the website for the worst of the worst to put in betwixt the selectively-edited comments. They’ll do their best to get the normie viewer’s amygdala to explode.
Normie viewers don’t go for the source. They’ll turn off the TV and go back to sleep.
The Daily Show interviewed Peter Schiff for 90 minutes and then ran a 2-minute hit piece on him.
Cernovich held his own with the old guy, but they put his segment next to a blogger who just makes shit up…guilt by association.
I understand it’s tempting, and congratulations on your completely-deserved success that they’re noticing you, but I strongly recommend you do not, good sir.
LikeLike
N0
LikeLike
I’m surprised that no one suggest to hire GBFM to be his media spokesman.
That’d get my vote!
LikeLike
Interesting
LikeLike
Why would you? You don’t need them. They need you however to stay relevant. Why would you help the enemy stay relevant?
LikeLike
Agree to an in-person interview and send a hooker.
LikeLike
a transgender hooker
LikeLike
They are just looking for your scalp, as yours would be extremely valuable to them. They’ll happily violate any legal agreement you put in place in order to get it. You have nothing to gain and everything to lose. I assume you have your reasons for staying anonymous, can you afford to go public? Do you want to?
LikeLike
And of course they send you their whores. They’ve read this blog and know you like beautiful women and hate libtard manlets.
LikeLike
Heheh that’s not a tough guess on their part.
LikeLike
A few disturbing racist/sexist comments from you taken out of context would make a fine segway into their standard “ghetto kids in uniforms prepping for collij against all odds” segment.
LikeLike
I wouldn’t.
LikeLike
I never comment here but I am for this. Ignore them. It will make them crazier and crazier. Any response for you from you will look like engagement. Even suck a dick will give them hope. Give them nothing! The crazier they get the faster they’ll fall. You’re responding to them is the equivalent of CPR on a dying man. Just walk away
LikeLike
“Even suck a dick will give them hope.”
ROFL…
LikeLike
DON’T DO IT, HEARTISTE! You gain nothing by helping the liberturd mongoloid media out. They gain everything.
Your website is the Encyclopedia Britannica of game theory, national uprising and American renewal. Any “journalist” with half a brain could cull through it and put together an outstanding article for the bluepilled masses.
LikeLike
Comment in mod.
LikeLike
Don’t do it… but if you do, make your one condition a lifetime guarantee of twitter access. kekekekekekekekekekek
LikeLike
If you end up out in the open, revealed to all the public, then you have to run for president in 2020. I want to watch debates between you and the EGK.
But seriously, don’t talk to the media.
LikeLike
write-in: direct all inquiries to the leader of the Alt-Right, the Bronze Age Pervert.
LikeLike
CH,
Only two things can happen.
1. You gain in popularity and notariety. Then as the newfound power goes to your head your message is distorted and wattered down and you become ineffective. And yes ABALT (All bloggers are like that). Just look at Athol Kay for an example.
2. They destroy you and get you booted from all blogs, twitter, etc.
Given the above why would you do this. Many men look to the 3 Rs as the only real pure Red Pill. Why take a chance. Stay pure, stay potent and stay uncorrupted.
[CH: i don’t think it’s in my constitution to water myself down, but i take your point. i was leaning toward “ignore” and now you commenters have sealed the decision for me.]
LikeLike
also, if it’s unsolicited (by u) solicitation (by them), for ((media))-whores to threaten u upfront of legal recrimination isn’t it a form of blackmail/civil rights infringement, and most definitely extremely naughty?!?
Instead of thinking of carousing with them, shouldn’t u file some formal complaint or react with informal action for the effrontery for such brazen infringement of ur freedom of speech?
LikeLike
How about just “Fuck You.”
LikeLike
They’ll never agree to your terms and your willingness to interview, under any terms or conditions whatsoever, is a tacit assertion on your part that they still have a modicum of relevance, which we all know they don’t. Don’t give them that validation.
If you respond at all, it should only be to shiv them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dear Media,
Here’s the truth….
Sincerely yours,
The Resistance
No need to kow-tow their party line by holding back. Unleash hell. That’s what they wanted and that is what they shall recieve. Being paranoid like this is gonna get our side no where. It also means they can’t call us paranoid. A good rhetorical shiv to throw back at the left when they start with the paranoid shaming language is to remind them that as a grown male you are only following the legal standard of a reasonably prudent person. That standard includes statistics and scientific studies. Only a few of them are smart enough to point out that science is not absolute.
LikeLike
I was interview once, as I was walking away from a c-130. Apparently they won’t publish “fuck you cunt” but they will file their hurt feeligs report with your battalion commander. Who’s response was also fuck you cunt.
Not sure why they need to be told these things twice but there you go.
[CH: haha well done. both times.]
LikeLiked by 3 people
Give the media nothing. They are not acting in good faith, any agreements they make are worthless, and giving them anything only allows them to survive another day to push their propaganda.
LikeLike
https://www.rt.com/viral/397837-australia-muslim-women-sperm/
LikeLike
Mohamed Elmouelhy, the head of the Halal Certification Authority in Australia, wrote on his Facebook page that Australian women needed male Muslims because men in the country “are a dying breed.”
“Australian women need us to fertilize them and keep them surrounded by Muslim babies while beer swilling, cigarette smoking, drug injecting can only dream of what Muslim men are capable of,” his post read.
He added that Muslims “have a duty to make your [Australian women] happy.”
Elmouelhy concluded that the white race in the country “will be extinct in another 40 years” if Australia “is left to bigots.”
He advised Australian men to “better go choose a plot for yourself at your local cemetery” and “if you can’t afford it, commit suicide.”
LikeLike
The fact that ANYONE, let alone a muslim, can say these things and still walk around the next day, drawing breath, is WHY… WE… LOSE! 😡
LikeLike
Greg, are you saying that you’re getting your affairs in order Stateside and flying to Oz to drop a kebab-on-a-rope off highway overpass?
LikeLike
What do I look like, Crocodile Dundee?
If and when the time comes, my work is in Germany. And even THEY will probably tell me it was none of my beeswax. 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
Wog shooting his mouth off. News at 11.
LikeLike
White people: still doomed.
LikeLike
Ah, yet ANOTHER example of that “honest disagreement discourse” about which you once spoke?
GTFO, mo-fo… this ain’t no place for you.
LikeLike
Greg, you might be right, it’s not Strapon. At least she had kept her composure. This one gets emotional quickly.
LikeLike
This one’s Strappedin.
LikeLike
It’s clearly “uh”, slowpokes.
LikeLike
As someone with a loooooong history of sock-puppeting, we defer to your superior experience.
Do ALL of you fucks work the same room?
LikeLiked by 2 people
LOL Greg, just when I don’t think a witty reply is possible, you deliver one.
LikeLike
my ex ex said in Bangladesh where she got the last dude to copy me with foreigner they keep white people in like jails to reproduce em to get white woman says they have stories all the time on her facebook and they kill their own woman cause dont want em
whats up with that ml
LikeLike
Ignore the media.
Remember the thing with that interview (The Guardian?) years ago.
The media are very good at convincing you to they mean no harm, then they’ll mess you over if you talk to them. No agreement will be worth anything, because they’ll just violate it; they’re willing to bet you’re not going to take the time and trouble to sue them.
LikeLike
When there’s no accountability for being an asshole, assholes will run rampant.
Any agreement, such as it is, must start out by taking the reporter’s driver’s license and telling him:
“You might know who we are… but we KNOW who you are.”
/Goodfella rape!
LikeLike
No, it’s not time yet.
LikeLike
Ask them to post their question on this forum…
… for the ones CH doesn’t care to answer, we’ll pick up the slack. 😉
LikeLike
Or just have GBFM answer all their questions… lozlzozlzozlololzozlzolzozllozlololol
LikeLiked by 2 people
If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
LikeLike
So while the traitorous GOP congress is busy voting down its own healthcare reform bill… they have time to lock arms with the dems to try and dare Trump into vetoing the Russia sanctions…
Votes for and against… 98-2 in senate and 419-3 in the house…
We are going to need more rope…
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/trump-may-veto-russia-sanctions-bill-that-seeks-to-restrain-his-power/2017/07/27/0e9f5e8c-72ca-11e7-8f39-eeb7d3a2d304_story.html?utm_term=.318cd7e6475a
LikeLiked by 1 person
All of this without a single shred of proof.
Where and when have I seen Congress make a maneuver like this before?
Screw the rope. These bastards need to be crucified.
LikeLike
Well, that really puts the Swamp in perspective, doesn’t it?
Wall to wall unanimous treason.
LikeLike
Yep
LikeLike
Trump has been and is literally alone… Since day one. There were poseurs, there were bandwagoners, there were the self promoters drafting in the Trump Train wake… But really, when push comes to (((shekel))) it has always been him alone.
Votes for and against… 98-2 in senate and 419-3 in the house…
Veto proof unanimity on an issue that is made up and contrived to double bind him….
This is why I conclude he is getting into “fuck y’all” push the peddle down, hands off the wheel and watch what happens, except he has his direct conduit to the people to shine a light on Swamp behavior in real time.
There may be a march on Washington yet… break in those jackboots youse thugs…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, I agree with him in mega (or maga) “effe you” mode and is going to let these bastards drive themselves straight into irrelevancy.
For some GOPers, well shit, for most of them, midterms are next year and given their two-faced nature of sticking with obummercare will be remembered by some new blood that can make maneuvers in the vein of Trump.
Scott Adams had a brief write up on this and gave it a positive spin.
What won’t be surprising is when the loony left blames Trump when obummercare does implode, which is scaling at a rapid pace each day.
LikeLike
Russia sanctions bill goes to President’s desk with overwhelming bipartisan support. But will @POTUS sign? America first or somewhere else?
— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) July 28, 2017
LikeLike
Sleazy Adam Schiff, the totally biased Congressman looking into “Russia,” spends all of his time on television pushing the Dem loss excuse!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 24, 2017
LikeLike
Thanks @SenJohnMcCain, @lisamurkowski & @SenatorCollins for showing us what political courage looks like. Millions of Americans thank you.
— Adam Schiff (@RepAdamSchiff) July 28, 2017
LikeLike
3 Republicans and 48 Democrats let the American people down. As I said from the beginning, let ObamaCare implode, then deal. Watch!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 28, 2017
LikeLike
LikeLike
Muh Labia is giving off strong Strapon signals.
Naw… Strapunzel was obviously a yenta and just an antiTrump shitlib stooge.
This MuhLabia shill is the next echelon of JIDF – or an even MORE useful stooge, if he’s looking for maximum shame rather than shekels.
LikeLike
And two female turncoats.
LikeLike
Incorrect premise, here.
It isn’t that they’re obsessed with Russia because Trump is friendly toward it, i.e. trying to stymie Trump.
They’re using Trump’s friendliness to lock down a major geopolitical competitor according to established precedent, i.e. they’re trying to stymie Russia (again).
The only reasons the American establishment, i.e. the swamp, aren’t after China more than Russia are: a) our domination of the Pacific sealanes wouldn’t matter if we pulled away from Chinese suppliers and b) China doesn’t have any geopolitical stake in the Middle East.
The reason there’s total bipartisan support here is that it’s about Putin first, Trump a distant second.
LikeLike
Yeah trying to “stymie” what don’t need “stymieing” – Russia – is, Hymie, stymieing Trump…
Now collect your shekels and punch out…
LikeLike
and if they weren’t all cucks and traitors, at a minimum the GOP would have held back the anti Russia votes until they had some numbers on health care… a trade for value…
LikeLike
I see. Geopolitics doesn’t exist in your world. Sancta simplicitas.
In the real world, the American establishment have been anxious to keep Russia in check since, you know, the 40’s, being the largest nation on the planet, with some shit that other nations find useful like oil, gas, minerals, precious metals, diamonds, gold, etc.
But ok, politics is whatever you want it to be, and anyone who says otherwise is a Jew. Easy living.
[CH: circumstances change. russia is no longer an enemy. the enemies of russia are the new enemy, and for reasons having very little to do with russia directly.]
LikeLike
Try thinking beyond the moralistic terms in which the politicians themselves are mired. When they vote for sanctions against Russia, they think “enemy”. You think “not enemy”. Both are irrelevant judgements.
But it’s really about two things: control of resources and total dominance in the Middle East. All any of them really wants, whether they know it or not, is to weaken Russia as a player in both games. This is the constant; only the names change.
Whether one likes Russia or not, they still have x resources which other people – including us – need, and they still occupy a position to tip the scales a bit in the Middle East.
I’m not sure why this is something you feel the need to swat down reflexively, as dominance in the Middle East is the overriding goal of your (((boogeymen))).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Muh Labia is giving off strong Strapon signals.
LikeLike
Btw … ya ochen lyubyu Rossiyu. I was supposed to be moving there but a family incident has kept me here. So it isn’t as though I make this point from hostility. Rossiya nasha poslednyaya nadezhda!
LikeLike
Your guys’ rationalization hamster – remember that? – is as indefatigable as the ladies’ now.
LikeLike
(((bogeymen)))
Nuthin’ to see here, goys… pay no attention to the men behind the curtain…
Oh, look, somebody is throwing, kicking, or hitting a ball!!! Have a beer and relax… don’t worry, be happy.
:duckface
Quit telling on yourself, Schlomo.
The Russia issue goes beyond resources and geopolitical chess and your Marxist claptrap…
This is a matter of life and death for our kind, and for Christianity.
Oh, silly me… it’s not like those are two things (((you))) would care about, amirite?
Take a hike, kike… your foetur judaicus is stinkin’ up the joint.
LikeLike
Geopolitics? You dumb fuck… We own Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, Norway, Texas… Venezuela if we want it…
If it wasn’t about Isreal and bullshit Russian election interference there would be no need for sanctions against Russia… And We would join arms with Russia againt the common enemy. –
which is China via shared border on one hand and owning our debt on the other.
DGK Hymie…
LikeLike
Muh labia … here today, gone tomorrow … thriving beyond the dreams of avarice in the pays legal … never putting down roots in the pays reel … not a jew …
LikeLike
Shut your drooping ape lips, kike.
LikeLike
I know ML personally. He’s not a Jew, a 30-something Italian-American mutt who was very active in the Vanguard News Network community many years ago. He’s been working this “we’re doomed!” shtick for years, which got him banned from VNN, and Alex Linder himself told him: “I don’t like you.” When I met him he identified as a skinhead, but now he mostly enjoys feeling morally superior for what he perceives as not obsessing over Jews as he did for over a decade, so he likes to take potshots at those who aren’t defeatist cowards. As he said here before, he wanted to go to Russia to find a better job, since he’s been in prison for petty crime and now can’t hold a decent job in the US. He mostly bangs fat and ugly females because he doesn’t like to put in effort in pursuing high-quality ones, which he finds fault with before even getting to know them, and sometimes demonizes them irrationally. He suffers from a severe inferiority complex and hypergamy terrifies him. He literally used that word, terrifying, to describe it. I believe it all stems from his relationship with his mother, which is abnormal to say the least. He can be very perspicacious and he’s well-read, but he squandered any potential he had over the years, wasting time on petty crime and living like a bum. In 2015 he contacted me after years of absence, telling me he has a rare illness in his body joints and was in a lot of pain, and so he was planning his suicide. Then he proceeded to sign up on Facebook, friended hundreds of people including me and started posting daily, feeling sorry for himself and announcing his suicide, making a pathetic spectacle of it, instead of being stoic about it. I did my best to support him and told him, “If you must do it, do it like a man. Don’t make a show of it on Jewbook. It’s pathetic.” He hated me for saying this and blocked me. I ignored it and moved on. In 2016 I sent him an email, asking if he was still alive. He was, and after a few emails he told me I was absolutely right about it being pathetic. He seemed changed, renewed in a way, had a job in sales in WA. I advised him to pursue a young white female in WA who I knew was very eager to marry an older man and have children but he refused, because, as he put it, “she deserved to be genetic dead-end”. He told me about his plans to go to Russia, so I supported him again. I tried to have discussions with him about geopolitics, the turning of the tide that I saw in the Trump presidency, but he wasn’t interested. In fact before the Trumpening he said he intended to vote for Clinton just to see it all go down in flames. After a few more months he blocked me again for telling him some more harsh truths.
I tried to be understanding with him through his temper tantrums because of his illness. But it’s pointless. He thrives on feeling morally superior. It’s best to ignore him completely.
LikeLike
We need more boyscouts in congress.
LikeLike
Go with the “lol suck a dik” response, nothing pisses them off more than being mocked amd ridiculed.
LikeLike
LikeLiked by 3 people
Will it “wake” anyone? No.
Will they slander you? Yes.
Will they use you against Trump? Yes.
Will they use you as a rally cry for the Left to cast hate? Yes.
Will they use you to recruit more Leftists? Yes.
I would not recommend you do this. At all.
But if you must, have these CONTRACTED CONDITIONS (Which they will still ignore as they already have Lawyers on staff, and you would have to pay for one).
1. They cannot release any material without your viewing and approving first.
2. You have your own taping of the event running.
3. If any material is leaked, they immediately owe you $xxx in money.
Now, behavior wise.
1. Bring supporting evidence and hold it up for the camera to see if necessary.
2. Absolutely hold frame and do not apologize.
3. When you hold frame, also do not let them change the subject when you hold their feet to the fire on an issue. Repeat your frame and say you cannot move on until they acknowledge said fact.
Still, I wouldn’t do it.
LikeLike
This reminds me of a blog dealing with mens rights about ten years ago that had great content but one day just shut down.
This isn’t anecdotal. There is proof that there are people who will actively try and suppress the counter-narrative.
LikeLike
Ignore? Ignore??
Here is a golden opportunity to practice some Trumpenstrategy. They contacted you, so they need something from you. Use it. Play dirty like they do. Why would you pass up this chance to get back at them?
Threaten them with public shaming if you haven’t already done so, and yes, present them with your list of demands for semi-fair coverage. Why shouldn’t they taste their own medicine? Bully them. Dox them, dox them if you may.
Please do NOT ignore them. Smash them, or at least their monstrous egos.
LikeLike
This
And how about some good old fashioned subterfuge and misdirection?
Don’t say what you (we) really believe. Be completely opaque on what matters and locquaciously transparent on meaningless nonsense.
Keep their hamsters spinning. Make them scratch their heads and chase their own tails. Have some fun with it.
Meanwhile continue doing Gods work here behind the scenes.
We are not strong or numerous enough yet to stand against (((them))) out in the open. But that fact that they want to interview you means we are on (((their))) radar. We still need more time to recruit and train for the w.ars to come and being on (((their))) radar means the Armageddon clock is officially ticking….
Of course….don’t do ANY of this if there’s even a miniscule chance you will be doxxed
LikeLike
i remember the first time roosh agreed to one of those ‘interviews’
he learned his lesson quickly
LikeLike
get da gbfm to take your place!
‘i ain’t no fool, i ain’t no tool’
llzlozlzozllzllzzozlozlzz
LikeLike
Just say you’re pro-white. However they try to label you, make it clear you are PRO-WHITE.
LikeLike
Do not respond in any way. WHAT POSSIBLE GOOD CAN COME FROM IT?
LikeLike
Never talk to the press. Ever.
LikeLike
lifes short why not
LikeLike
Tell them you will only do it for ten million in cash, up front.
LikeLike
Ignore (((them))).
They will lie, double down on their lies, and, above all, they will project their own BS onto you: choose any ad hominem for they shall use them all. Vox Day is correct. Continue to make this blog into an alternative media source with RealTalk.
Despite your TOR VPN etc protection, they will only try to Dox you so as to have you disemployed from your day job.
Are you a credentialed professional? So sorry, the state licensing authority has had (((complaints))). You want to Milo the media? You’re hetero. You want to Cernovich the media. Your talk is to the Alt Lite what Genghis Khan is to Mother Teresa. The Overton window is shifting but not yet to volume 11 (Hi Fidelity CH).
Best wishes.
LikeLike
Accept, but tell them up-front that you’re going to record it AND post the full-length, unredacted audio.
LikeLike
The Christ-killers betrayed God’s Son. Are you deluded enough to believe that they would not betray you are anyone of us Red-Pilled CH frequenters?
LikeLike
Don’t do it, all it takes is one comment, one association, one joke out of context for them to create a hit-piece that will follow you around forever. Roosh is the pro legalised rape advocate etc
LikeLike
Give the MSM nothing. Cut The Cord means no money or content for the fucks.
If you happen to feel the need to express your thoughts via an interview do something on Gab. Maybe Gab TV with a good interviewer. Or reach out to Molyneux, that could be a good interview.
PS Of course if feeling your oats, hit up the 2 hunnies that do ‘Virtue of the West’ show.
LikeLike
I had a thought, perhaps you could give a nod to the Trumpening, by presenting some vile few sentences of some Dworkinesk feminist-maybe just in a response email, or interview via email for maximal troll control-, present them as your own, and watch them fall over themselves printing how racist you are. Should be mildly obscure but maximally horrendous(there should be no shortage of these type of feminist quotes). Hook, line and sinkher.
LikeLike
dont do it. as the devil said in the devils advocate : “vanity is definitely my favourite sin”.
LikeLike
As much as I can understand the appeal of these journos coming to you for quotes, I would ignore them. First of all, as Gavin McInnes said, these bums often already know what they’re gonna write about when they solicit quotes. They are hoping that you’ll slip up and provide some fodder for them to tar you as a misogynist racist. If you say something nuanced and insightful, they’ll just misquote you or won’t use your words altogether.
Moreover, these guys are so unprincipled, and would think nothing of revealing your identity. Basically their view is that they’re the good guys and they’ll do whatever they want. Look at how Razib Khan wasn’t allowed to write for The NY Times. Unfortunately, the institutional support is on their side. We can’t afford to lose you. Besides, a lot of people are coming to you without you speaking to the mainstream media.
LikeLike
Address these fucks via your site.
LikeLike
I would suggest that you ignore them completely and totally. You don’t need them to get your message out. On the other hand they desperately need you to legitimize their slander against men and you in particular.
The MSM are SCUM and FILTH!
You (we) will NEVER EVER be treated fairly by the MSM.
Talking to them gives them credibility, and that is the last thing we should give them.
LikeLike
I would suggest that you ignore them completely and totally. You don’t need them to get your message out. On the other hand they desperately need you to legitimize their slander against men and you in particular.
The MSM are SCUM and FILTH!
You (we) will NEVER EVER be treated fairly by the MSM.
Talking to them gives them credibility, and that is the last thing we should give them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The thing is that you cannot expect to be treated fairly by the media even if they sign and swear on a stack of Das Kapital. If they cannot get a kill quote or if they cannot project you in a negative light they will simply kill the story. And I agree about the White Supremacy thing. White Supremacy has become a loaded term that now means anyone who is insufficiently ashamed of being White. Using White Supremacy immediately turns normies against you. But I like White Activism or White Advocacy better than White Competancy. And that is what it really is.
LikeLike
Do NOT engage!
Let them eat static!
LikeLike
If you insult them I think it’ll give them more urgency to publish their slop and then more people will be exposed to your stuff
LikeLike
No no no to engagement
That’s a no.
They have no fucking fuel unless yo give it to them
The manosphere is going further mainstream and they don’t like it
LikeLike
Vox Dat is an autistic wannabe Alpha. He talks a big game about not needing the media or being willing to talk to them but then justifies doing so every time any brand names take an interest.
LikeLike
By the way, it’s a war.
Wars should be fought on territory you choose, at a time you choose with weapons you choose and in a way that you choose.
LikeLike
This thread: the most involved and productive comment section since I started paying attention to comment sections.
LikeLike
Roosh’s Dr. Oz treatment tells you everything you need to know. Don’t cast pearls before swine.
http://www.rooshv.com/how-i-was-backstabbed-by-dr-oz-and-his-female-producers
LikeLike
It seems that Shkreli reads The Chateau https://www.facebook.com/embracecapitalism/photos/a.468105643526188.1073741829.241456949524393/501175460219206/?type=3
LikeLike