Feed on
Posts
Comments

Body Language Analysis

Submitted for your judgment: A photo of four — two women, two men — preserved in a ripely evocative group pose begging for a body language analysis.

We’ll start with the men.

USA Hat: strong posture, shit-kicking boots, no toothy smile, no hoverhand (his hidden hand might even be snugly nestled in the small of the woman’s back), contrapposto standing pose (this is the iconic alpha male pose when standing in place), the fist is a little try-hard and cheesy but it works as an accessory to his general aura. Most telling: he has no discomfort pressing his body and her body together for the camera. A subatomic particle couldn’t wedge itself between those two. Bonus body language cue: there’s a subtle, yet jam-packed with sexual polarity, power dynamic in evidence: she’s practically motor-boating his pecs. VERDICT: ALPHA MALE

Paramilitary Peacocker: feet pointing straight ahead and nearly heel to heel in a casual setting indicates some discomfort with his surroundings, arms clasped tightly behind back add to the overall impression of closed body language indicating that this man is uneasy in this free-wheeling social environment and doesn’t want his body intruding in the physical or sociosexual senses. The un-toothed smirk is a plus as is the Eastwoodian squint, but the facial confidence is betrayed by his body leaning into the group. If you’re worried about getting cropped from a photo, don’t lean in; just position yourself closer to the center of the pack, even if it means physical closeness that stresses you out. VERDICT: RECENTLY WOKE AND WILLING TO LEARN BETA MALE

Now the women:

Blondie: Easy natural smile, relaxed posture. She’s executing a three-quarter turn which means she’s not too solipsistic for a woman (the self-absorbed women tend to stop whatever they’re doing and turn to pose conspicuously and dramatically for the camera), the three-quarter turn with one knee bent also reveals an underlying feminine warmth that I bet translates to a preference for bedroom intimacy…and note to whom her bent knee is pointing (USA! USA!). This broad looks like a lot of fun at a party, the type of girl who’d scamper around making everyone feel at home. VERDICT: ALPHA FEMALE BASED ON LOOKS ALONE

High Contrast Ravenette: Her smile is a mystery novel, evoking at once consternation, callousness, mischief, and a volcanic smoldering sexuality. Her MAGAma is about to blow. All she needs is to find that man with enough T in the tank to scale her summit, peer over her precipice, and with a cocksure grin coax a mighty eruption from the abyss that is her tightly wound womanly soul. And from the body language assessment I have provided so far, that man won’t be Paramilitary Peacocker. Bonus body language clue: look closely and you’ll see she’s matching USA Hat’s contrapposto pose. Mmmmhmmmm, awww yeeeeahhh. VERDICT: ALPHA FEMALE BASED ON LOOKS ALONE

PS Big ups to both women for keeping their hair long and their tats, if they have them, away from their necks and faces. It’s almost too much to ask of women nowadays, ain’t it?

PPS Ladies, ladies, don’t knit your delicate brows. You should feel honored to place among the women who have served as CH muses. Seriously.

100 Responses to “Body Language Analysis”

  1. That looks like Lauren Southern, Based Stickman, Tara McCarthy and some unknown dude.

    Like

  2. tomjones says:

    Total number of white babies=0

    Epic. Fail.

    c’mon —buns in da ovenz, people.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Mr. Frosty says:

      Thank You

      These useless thots are spending their most fertile years posing for pictures and giving speeches that are essentially alt-lite power point presentations. If they really cared about our cause they would be married mothers doing the exact same thing from YouTube.

      Liked by 1 person

      • tomjones says:

        If they never posed for pictures and gave speeches and gave up any politics and pushed out 4 kids from their vags, they’d being doing more than enough for our world.

        Forget blogs. Forget voting.

        Like

  3. theasdgamer says:

    Peacocker is leaning to be in the photo, but he’d be in the center surrounded by women if he were alpha. At least he’s within three feet of a woman with his arm around her back. He should be hip to hip with ravenette with a comfortable smile on his face…bonus points if he gives her rabbit ears.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Haven M. says:

    High contrast ravenette lose points for below the knee skirt?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Cracker says:

      that skirt length adds points for me

      it’s not frumpy/ugly like those ones that go all the way to the ankle. and above the knee would mean she wasn’t taking the function seriously, she was just there to slut it up and get attention.

      that is the perfect length for looking feminine but not slutty

      Liked by 1 person

      • 88 says:

        i agree. short skirts are for the club or cocktail parties.

        if your girl is wearing them to anything else, she’s looking for attention from other men and not respectful of you or kind of event she is at. same goes for showing a lot of cleavage.

        Like

  5. barbaresco says:

    Lauren Southern! My kinda gal.

    Like

    • TLM says:

      You must be black, she’s a mudshark, enjoy.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Is she really a mudshark, or was that picture of her with some sambo-looking shitskin merely some spur-of-the-moment horning in on her space?

        Like

      • tomjones says:

        I guess you clowns will never grow up.

        No, just because a chick is in a picture with a sambo it doesn’t mean she’s sleeping with the negroid.

        Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

        Like

      • TLM says:

        Not sure or care GE. But apparently she’s Canadian and dates beaners so sharking can’t be much of a stretch after that.

        These alt-right chicks appear to be like the whores that followed around the Roman legion(s) baggage trains. Lots of easy attention and resources to extract from thirsty men. They do well for themselves as plain Jane’s living large in a society now dominated by fatties. In the 80’s the dark haired one would have been considered homely, fast forward to 2017 and she’s hot. My how times have changed.

        Liked by 1 person

      • TLM says:

        TJ,

        Clearly she’s into the sambo in this pic.

        https://peopledotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/brown-simpson-1024.jpg?w=1024&h=768

        Never mind, thought it was Southern, but it’s Nicole.
        They look very much a like with the high cheek bones, masculine jaw lines, verdict- she’s a shark.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        Lauren’s voice is deeper that Based Stickman’s. Watch out!

        Like

      • Tarl Cabot says:

        Naw, in the 80s the brunette would’ve still have been considered hot, in a Winona Ryderish sort of way (which works for me, anyway). But I get your point: not so much then as now.

        Civilizational decline is not all fun and games.

        Like

    • Lichthof says:

      The chins on both women annoy me.

      Like

  6. 1 says:

    The “beta male” is Luke Rukowski or whatever east European last name…from WeAreChange. Also, Lauren southern is only hot when she goes otaku…the Burnett girl is just cute not even hot. Lmao

    Liked by 1 person

  7. […] Body Language Analysis […]

    Like

  8. V. says:

    Quick note about Mr. PP here.

    Someone on here (apologies, forget who) recommended “parade rest” as the best neutral stance for a man, because its military origin implies masculinity/strength and also it “prevents hoverhand”, which it does, I guess… because your hands are locked behind your back, neutered and safe lest any nearby lady fear your flirtatious grasp.

    This position, which Mr. PP is adopting in this photo, always struck me as toolish – its closed regal body language says “don’t touch me” — but I figured I would try it. And I did, to predictably bad results. Regardless of whether your hand placement is correct, you will probably get made fun of, unless you’re at an art gallery.

    Best stance is hands by your side, standing contrapposto, as CH writes. (With a belt-level drink in one hand, natch.) Second best is arms akimbo, but it’s rather out of fashion nowadays. You run the risk of looking more like Dwight Schrute than John Wayne.

    Like

  9. Sorcerygod says:

    I like the guy leaning in the best. He has more “personality” than the other 3 combined. I realize this will horrify some of you, but his attitude covers the range from “holding a secret” to “willing to let you go if you’ll go to bat for him.”

    I agree with Heartiste’s description of the alpha male in front, and I don’t mind the fist, but I find those who are all seriousness tend to be downers in other areas of their lives. Guy-leaning-in has a multishaded range. I like that.

    Like

  10. Polymath says:

    They’re all alpha, because that smirk is just too good not to be, really an A+ level smirk.

    Like

  11. Anonymous says:

    Any guy who wears a backpack, for anything, is a beta supreme.

    [CH: backpacks are fairly common accoutrements on ghetto nogs, for some reason. maybe it’s all a bunch of 25 year olds going to their tenth grade english class?]

    Liked by 1 person

    • Tam the Bam says:

      … common accoutrements on ghetto nogs
      For any ‘undocumented shopping’ opportunities that arise. A backpack means they can then employ the only skill the race has. Running like buggery away, afterwards.
      [doesn’t apply to the ‘big-boned’ waddlers, obviously]

      Also means drug mules can ditch the load if cops home in, in one easy movement, no frantic raking through pockets, or up the arse.

      Like

    • Ironsides says:

      “Any guy who wears a backpack, for anything, is a beta supreme.”

      So, every military man, hunter, mountain climber, and traveler since like forever has been a beta supreme? Oetzi the Iceman was wearing a backpack, for that matter.

      Are people carrying weapons, say, supposed to not carry spare ammunition/supplies/medical equipment if they’re alpha? That’s a weird definition of alpha and beta.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Sticky Burr says:

      You’re an idiot

      Like

    • V. says:

      yeah, but what’s the alternative?

      – briefcase: incel chic (unless suited)
      – plastic bag: homeless chic
      – duffel bag: typically overkill & cumbersome

      in most social situations a bag of any sort will look out of place, and that’s really pp’s fail here. it’d look odd if he was carrying anything in this photo.

      side note: is he using the strap to hold his phone for livestreaming? also, canvas or leather make anything better.

      Like

      • Ironsides says:

        Doesn’t really look like a social situation. Out of the 6 people in the photo, 4 are wearing backpacks, and given who the people in the foreground are, I’m guessing this is something from Berkeley or some other antifa-haunted gathering.

        Those backpacks probably contain (at least in the men’s cases) supplies such as water for washing off pepper spray, possibly pepper spray of their own, first aid supplies, etc. It even looks like the Paramilitary Peacock has a helmet hanging on the left side of his backpack; there’s some dome-shaped object there at least. There’s also some kind of handle sticking up above his left shoulder.

        Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      Why don’t you come on a full kit run with me to find out how beta backpacks really are…..
      (I might have to shake my haid over this one)

      Like

    • Jaded Jurist says:

      This was the Berkeley event when antifa girl got punched. What, other than a backpack, would you use to transport helmet, gas mask, first aid equipment, and photography equipment when you’re a documentary filmmaker, as Luke Rudkowski is?

      No snark, I’m actually curious.

      Like

  12. theng85 says:

    From left to right, there’s Lauren Southern, Based Stickman, and Brittany Pettibone. No clue who the guy on the right is, he looks like he’s not even supposed to be in the picture.

    Also telling is there were rumors that Based Stickman was having an affair with Brittany Pettibone. They’re not official, but if you didn’t know better you’d assume they were a couple based on how close they are and how their bodies are turned towards one another. Hell, even Lauren’s body is turned towards BSM.

    Like

  13. Anonymous says:

    PP is wearing a motorcycle jacket. So points for that.

    Like

  14. elmertjones says:

    First, in the morning :
    Drink large cup of black coffee,
    Take a massive dump

    Liked by 1 person

  15. i.e. Blondie: Then, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reminded the U.S. president how successful the fight against the ozone hole had been and how it had been possible to convince industry leaders to reduce emissions of the harmful gas.

    Like

  16. Doktor Jeep says:

    These people look familiar….. oh wait.

    The “beta” on the right…. Not sure how beta he is. His success rate as a journalist in getting things done is not beta. I get to wondering if a man’s mission in life can steer him towards beta or alpha status. Imagine for example an average fellow becomes a drill sarge on the one hand, but I have known a few real drill sergeants who could order men around all day but would go home to big fat ugly domineering wife.

    So there goes that theory…

    Things are already off the map across the board, socially and politically, as the status quo leftoid cathedral implodes, feminism continues its cascade failure, and democratic-egalitarian cultism is left out exposed with an Overton Window pushing rightward. So who knows.

    Theory 2: Based Stickman “bagging” one of these alt-right hotties is going to bring beta boys “to the yard” so to speak. That is, it was beta boys who went to anti-war protests “to get laid” in the 1960s and got sucked into the indoctrination. Standing with any crowd and repeating some mindless tantra IS brainwashing.
    Now as irritating as beta boys are, if they are drawn to anything feminine, and if the alt-right becomes home to generally good looking (read: not big fat blue haired screeching cuntosaurs) women, even if the beta boys are being as pathetic as usual, and are not going to “get some”, it is STILL a “masculine energy” (sexual desire) that got them there.
    And that is really all that would be needed to open the door so to speak. The left knew how to lead men (to their doom) by their dicks. This is why we should not be too keen to tell these alt-right vixens to head to the kitchen to make a sandwich.

    I just hope they don’t get SMV-wrecked by some antifa getting creative. Of course if such an incident would occur, white knight betas might go full deus vult.

    Like

  17. The Jews at Breitbart fired Katie McHugh over this:

    There would be no deadly terror attacks in the U.K. if Muslims didn’t live there. #LondonBridge

    — Katie McHugh🇺🇸 (@k_mcq) June 3, 2017

    (((Breitbart)))

    Like

  18. Jeff says:

    Find pictures of Melania diverting Trump’s kis while grabbing his hands not allowing him to pull her in and CH would say it was a bad moment shot. But show him a moment in time like this and he’ll tell you who and what is going on.

    They both look like dweebs. Guy in middle has his pants tucked in? Good gawd. Sweater and hat? Compensating for something with that mean scary fist? I’m frightened of him just looking at the picture!!!

    Is it possible someone said cram together, let’s get a picture of you guys. And 5 seconds later you have this picture. CH acts like they spent 10 minutes getting ready for the picture and were posing.

    I thought the closed position was hands folded in front of you. The alpha military guy puts his hands behind his back showing a sign of no fear and critqueing someone or something.

    [CH: hands clasped in front of crotch is worse than clasped tightly behind the back, but neither pose is great in a relaxed social situation.]

    Like

    • Mr. Frosty says:

      Stickman is trying too hard. I always got that vibe from him. He presents total alpha to compensate for something. The criminal record, Asian wife and signals against White Nationalism also speak poorly of his character.

      [CH: he’s not try-hard. just the opposite, he’s a natural born alpha. the kind of alpha who doesn’t think so much before taking action, and this gets him in trouble sometimes.]

      Like

  19. Lauren Southern has a more abrasive than average personality for a woman. Low B5 Agreeableness is correlated with libertarian politics, so a lot of explicitly right wing women, especially secular right wing women, are like that. So, the feminine warmth part is wrong.

    She is quite high in B5 Extraversion though. That’s something often mistaken for warmth.

    She’s also smart and very pretty.

    [CH: i haven’t heard or seen Southern except in photos, so I wouldn’t know about her personality. I’m only going by this one photo in which she does to my eyes exude warmth. i have to agree though that secular right wing women who define themselves by their politics are outliers for their sex and probably skew to the less girly side of the female ledger.]

    Like

    • Cloudswrest says:

      “i haven’t heard or seen Southern”

      Easy on both the eyes and ears. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=lauren+southern

      [CH: WB]

      Like

    • ML says:

      She doesn’t seem disagreeable in her videos. Great rack, cute smile. But oozes “career first” / d’nations, naturally.

      Like

    • In general, I’d advise people to stay the hell away from the women hanging around the alt right or any less mainstream right wing movement. Women, in particular, are herd creatures, so anyone too far out of the mainstream is probably pretty damaged.

      Now, obviously you should stay away from shitlibs, but mainstream conservative or apolitical are way preferable to alt right groupies.

      —–

      That said, Southern herself seems pretty emotionally stable.

      [CH: hate to say it but probably same is true for some of the alt right men.]

      Liked by 1 person

      • manwhoisthursday says:

        It’s more variable for alt right men though. You get some really smart, honest folk who are there for the right reasons. But, like any fringe movement, you get a lot of the dregs of society, people who can’t fit in anywhere else.

        See also my personality profile of political extremists.

        [CH: reader PA has argued (persuasively imo) that the anger management issue shitlords, petty criminals, and borderline crazies are a necessary tent pole of any dissident movement that seeks to overthrow an entrenched corrupt elite. sure, you wouldn’t hang out with them at your local craft brew pub, and maybe you cringe at some of their antics, but in the scheme of things they fuck shit up that needs fucking up and that the more genteel elements of the rebel faction aren’t willing to fuck up.]

        Like

      • PA says:

        CH, indeed. I put it in terms of a healthy society including its own reasonably contained criminal class. This includes scum. It’s not just useful for political assertion. It’s a vital element a nation’s creative spirit.

        In my own non-scientific opinion but one based on observation, I call out these four as ingredients of a Liberal Personality:

        INFP profile
        Mid-wit intelligence
        High disgust threshold
        Low empathy

        https://paworldandtimes.wordpress.com/2016/08/14/the-liberal-personality/

        Liked by 2 people

      • manwhoisthursday says:

        reader PA has argued (persuasively imo) that the anger management issue shitlords, petty criminals, and borderline crazies are a necessary tent pole of any dissident movement that seeks to overthrow an entrenched corrupt elite. sure, you wouldn’t hang out with them at your local craft brew pub, and maybe you cringe at some of their antics, but in the scheme of things they fuck shit up that needs fucking up and that the more genteel elements of the rebel faction aren’t willing to fuck up.

        Not totally disagreeing.

        BTW, ever see Lawrence of Arabia. It has a major “crazy guerrilla leader gets sidelined after winning the war” theme to it.

        Like

    • Doktor Jeep says:

      We have to also take into consideration that libertarianism might be a cause, or at the least a vector of, autism.

      Like

  20. Stickman doesn’t look like the sort of guy who would have an oriental wife

    Like

  21. manwhoisthursday says:

    The personality factor most associated with male attractiveness is B5 Extraversion. This is the optimism/confidence factor.

    Zero Fucks Given, analyzed in terms of personality, is composed of the following:

    Low B5 Conscientiousness – you don’t care about consequences
    Low B5 Agreeablenss – you don’t care about people
    Low B5 Neuroticism – you don’t care about pain

    Extraversion and Conscientiousness do not have significant sex differences, though there are some differences on subfactors.

    Men are significantly lower in Agreeableness and slightly lower in Neuroticism.

    Psychopathy/the Dark Triad are really just low Agreeableness/low Conscientiousness. This can mimic Extraversion, because you literally don’t give a fuck.

    Like

    • manwhoisthursday says:

      Incidentally the personality traits that affect politics are as follows:

      B5 Openness to Experience – high for liberal/libertarian and low for conservative
      B5 Conscientiousness subfactor Orderliness – high for conservative and low for liberal/libertarian
      B5 Agreeableness subfactor Compassion – high for liberal and low for conservative/libertarian
      IQ – low for conservative (low B5 Openness is correlated with low IQ), moderate for liberal, and high for libertarian

      Incidentally, Orderliness is the factor associated with religiousness. Women score somewhat higher on it than men.

      [CH: which personality trait correlates closely with high/low disgust thresholds? this is a feeling that seems to most starkly demarcate libs and cons. also, i thought the IQ diff b/t libs and cons was, once controlled for race/ethnicity, largely nonexistent? audacious epigone had some posts on the topic.
      i remain skeptical about B5 findings. having seen a lot of women’s bathrooms, “orderliness” is the last word i’d use to describe them.]

      Like

      • manwhoisthursday says:

        The IQ difference for Republicans and Democrats is largely non-existent, because libertarians are the highest IQ group and they bring up the Republican average. Conservatives bring down the Republican score, though this is true only of low Openness conservatives.

        Disgust sensitivity is most associated with high Orderliness, though high IQ/high Openness can dampen that down too.

        I would suggest that women you have slept with are not a random sample.

        [CH: they felt random. but for real, the dirty disheveled bathroom thing is pretty well acknowledged even by women, single or married. orderliness seems to be more a male thing (like the military, or hobbies involving collection and curating).
        isn’t the hexaco model considered superior to the B5 model now? see: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1088868306294907
        as for lib-con IQ diffs, the evidence i’ve read puts it at not much more than 1 or 2 IQ point spread. really not much to write home about.]

        Like

      • manwhoisthursday says:

        These are personality factors associated with high numbers of sex partners, in both sexes:

        High Extraversion – like to party, especially important for men, but also for women
        High Openness – open to new experiences, low disgust threshold
        Low Conscientiousness – don’t care about consequences, irresponsible, low disgust threshold
        Low Agreeableness – don’t care about feelings or relationships

        Interestingly, high Neuroticism was also associated with high numbers of sex partners, but only among women.

        [CH: i am jack’s totally unsurprised id carver. women love drama aka soul pain, and particularly drama-prone women need their fix any way they can get it, which in practice for them means a lot of sex partners. men, otoh, prefer drama-free relationships. the whole “men are drawn to crazy bitches” schtick that feminists bleat is nothing more than their psychological projection of their own sexual and romantic desire.]

        Like

      • manwhoisthursday says:

        And this is the profile for political extremists (on both the left and the right):

        Low Openness/low IQ
        High Orderliness
        Either very low Compassion (right wing) or very high Compassion (left wing)
        High Neuroticism

        It’s about what you’d expect. Extremists are stupid and crazy, as well as being very right or left wing.

        Like

      • manwhoisthursday says:

        Given all of the above, I’d suggest that men use cleanliness and level of organization as a proxy for a girl’s partner count and/or marriage worthiness. It is my experience as well that promiscuous girls live in squalor. However, this may be a problem for some: clean and organized girls are also much more likely to be religious.

        (The other prong of Conscientiousness, the subfactor Industriousness, how hard you work, is not a proxy for low partner count. How hard a girl works is essentially meaningless either way in this context.)

        The trait where women differ most from men, high Agreeableness/Compassion, is also a proxy for a low partner count. Compassionate people value intense personal relationships above all else, so these types gravitate towards LTRs. This also means that more typically feminine women are likely to have low partner counts. But, paradoxically, this is also a trait that predisposes women towards left wing politics. This is what explains low n liberals.

        More Extraverted women are more likely to have higher partner counts. This is likely where our host gets the idea that bubbly, enthusiastic girly girls are more promiscuous.

        High Openness means artsy women and liberal women screw around more. Libertarian women (high Openness, low Orderliness, low Agreeableness) will be as bad as liberals.

        And stay away from the crazy, for this and a host of reasons.

        ——

        Basically, except for high Agreeableness pushing liberal women somewhat away from promiscuity, this all conforms to stereotypes.

        Libertarian women – high Openness, low Orderliness, low Agreeableness.

        Like

      • manwhoisthursday says:

        “It felt random” is meaningless. It wasn’t a random sample of the population at a large. Urban enclaves = not random.

        [CH: what if i told you half my women were bedded in small towns and rural exclaves?]

        Hexaco is not superior. BFAS, a refinement of the B5, is now state of the art.

        Lib v. con is not right v. left or Rep. v. Dem.

        [ok, but aren’t blacks socially con? if race isn’t controlled, that surely will depress avg con IQ.]

        Like

      • manwhoisthursday says:

        what if i told you half my women were bedded in small towns and rural exclaves?

        Still wouldn’t be a random sample.

        Men are more likely to be slobs, but male slobs accumulate less shit. A male slob has a couple beer cans and some pizza boxes on the floor. A female slob has piles of clothing, a couple wine bottles, make up kits, kitty litter, torn sheets, a broken vase, and on and on.

        So, the bathroom of a female slob has all these cremes, tampons, dirty q tips, hair, eyelashes, toothbrushes, clothes, used condoms etc. A male slob just has a hairbrush and piss all over the toilet.

        Like

      • manwhoisthursday says:

        [ok, but aren’t blacks socially con? if race isn’t controlled, that surely will depress avg con IQ.]

        It’s a worldwide thing.

        Like

    • cortesar says:

      It’s about what you’d expect. Extremists are stupid and crazy, as well as being very right or left wing
      —————————————————————————————————-
      normie muh constitution “alt-right chicks are dangerous and crazy” faggot are you sure this is the right blog for you?
      There is a lot stupid, crazy low agreeableness extremists here even nahzies like myself
      What would your “muh constitution” girlfriend tell you if she knew where you spend your time instead of mowing the lawn

      Like

  22. ML says:

    Save me oh white alpha superchads!!

    [CH: nice. is girl on right her sister?]

    Like

  23. Haven M. says:

    I think folks here are reacting to a ROK take down of her. She feeds on RWNJ thirst…Upshot: she sent out a photo of her camel toe.

    Like

  24. Quaid says:

    Paramilitary Peacock and Blondie arrived by motorcycle – He has a press pass and is hiding a tripod behind his back … He’s the guy you open in conversation – while giving blondie a little neg

    Like

  25. Sticky Burr says:

    Lauren Southern looks like she could be Corey Feldman in drag

    Liked by 1 person

  26. Travis says:

    Pointy elbows.
    3/10
    WNB

    Seriously, guys? Lauren and Brittany aren’t perfect. Who is? But they’re young, attractive, slender girls who are a hell of a lot more woke than the average thot. Yeah. It would be nice if they were cranking out little shitlords, but for the moment don’t discount the propaganda value of having attractive young women speaking out on the MAGA side. Cute girls bring beta guys. And beta guys bring more cute girls looking for male attention. The pattern repeats, and the culture begins to shift to the right.
    IMO, we should be encouraging girls like this. Who cares if they’re getting some attention whoring points out of the deal? All women seek that out. At least these two are going about it in the right way. We’re always (rightly) complaining about the average western women. These ladies are at least trying. Reward that effort with praise and approval. At the very least it sends a message to other young women that they have something to gain from rejecting the degenerate status quo.

    Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      I’ll agree with everything except that beta guys bring more cute girls.
      More cute girls only show up for the ONE leader – call him ‘Alpha’ if you like – of the movement, or to be where other cute girls are.
      To be part of The Sultan’s harem.

      Like

      • Travis says:

        Eh. I disagree. They won’t be screwing the beta guys, but they like their attention. Same reason you have so many girls trying to pretend to be “gamers”. They aren’t attracted to the beta guys, but they’re attracted to all the Facebook “likes” the betas provide.

        Like

    • Lauren’s job is to be a role model to other hot girls and signal that it’s ok not to be a liberal and that you will still have a good social group with all the status and goodies that go along with it.

      Most of what she says is simply parrot right wing talking points and that’s fine.

      Like

  27. cortesar says:

    Like

Leave a Reply