Feed on
Posts
Comments

Feminism is a disease that afflicts everyone, including women, but the twisted ideology’s truly innocent victims are boys. Reader Passer By links to a Carlos Slim Personal Blog article on the “decline of men”. He comments,

Btw, just learned about some interesting studies, posted at the (((NYT)))

Basically they argue that single motherhood weakened mostly the male children, because the sisters in such one parent families perform better in life than the brothers. In normal families, there is no difference or brothers perform better.

In other words, the lack of father harms more the male child than the female child. Therefore if you want to weaken men, push for single motherhood. No wonder jews try to destroy the family in the West, while simultaneously strengthening the family in Israel. There is deliberate push to decrease male influence in western society because jews feel threatened by white males, and by their innate nationalism.

So the next time a woman tells you that there aren’t enough good men, you can answer her: there aren’t enough good men because they were raised by women.

That’s a great truth Passer By wrote. There aren’t enough good men because they were raised by women. Trigger the shit out of any feminist or mangina lackey you come across on twatmedia with that stone cold shiv, and link to the relevant study.

From the CSPB article,

In a 2016 paper, David Autor, an economist at M.I.T., and four co-authors, measured academic and economic outcomes of brothers and sisters in Florida born in the decade between 1992 and 2002.

For boys and girls raised in two-parent households, there were only modest differences between the sexes in terms of success at school, and boys tended to earn more than their sisters in early adulthood.

Among children raised in single-parent households, however, boys performed significantly less well than their sisters in school, and their employment rate as young adults was lower. “Relative to their sisters,” Autor and his collaborators wrote, “boys born to disadvantaged families” — with disadvantage measured here by mother’s marital status and education — “have higher rates of disciplinary problems, lower achievement scores, and fewer high-school completions.”

When the children in the study reached early adulthood, the same pattern emerged in employment:

Employment rates of young women are nearly invariant to family marital status, while the employment rates of young adult men from non-married families are eight to ten percentage points below those from married families at all income levels.

Autor and his co-authors conclude that family structure “is more consequential for the skills development and labor market outcomes of boys than girls.”

This study is more interesting than the run-of-the-mill research recapitulating the detrimental effects of single mommery (a major cause celebre of mainstream feminism), because its structure seems to obviate any potential genetic influence into sex-differentiated life outcomes. That is, if genetics were the cause, then the sisters of brothers in single mom broken families would have similarly poor outcomes and behavioral problems. But instead what the researchers found was that single mommery disproportionately affected the life outcomes of boys, leaving their sisters largely untouched (at least as measured by SES outcome and delinquency rate) by the single mommery postindustrial complex.

This isn’t to say genetics aren’t a factor in the shitshow that is single mommery, but it does suggest environmental pressures inherent to single mommery are at least partly to blame for making life harder on boys.

It’s just more evidence that feminism has been, and continues to be, a Hate Machine dedicated to churning out Big Lies about the sexes and about their roles in society, with the express purpose of handicapping boys and men and lavishing extreme favoritism and government largesse on girls and women.

It’s silly to argue feminism is a symptom, rather than a cause, of a broken society when its agenda has directly contributed to so much social disruption, antagonism, distrust, resentment, and national decline. This is like arguing Marxism, Freudianism, Communism, SCALE, and GloboHomoism are symptoms of some deeper, underlying, corrupting force that bedevils the West. Large, society-spanning movements are as much cause as symptom of social degeneration. We’re splitting vellus hairs here.

If one wants to argue for a First Cause of the West’s decline, the most promising culprit would be Hajnalianism, but for some reason those who find SCALE objectionable rarely tackle the subject of inherited empathobesity.

Feminism as a distinctive movement really got started as a vanity project of masculinized or otherwise oddball women who were for various reasons uncomfortable in the world of women. Its leaders — and one shouldn’t neglect to mention the preponderance of feminist leaders were and are Jewish women and their co-tribal male suckups — were able to leverage their gripes to a wider audience of women who had become frustrated and flustered and, in plenty of cases, enthused, by the postindustrial revolution shocks to the social system that, critically, severed fecundity from sex and community from individual.

There was never a feminist movement that had its origins in widespread complaints about male discrimination against working women. That is a myth. Pre-20th Century Western women worked plenty, either on the home or off it. Wives working as apprentices to their husbands’ businesses was fairly common in Medieval Europe.

What feminism has been, and what it remains today, is a propaganda howitzer to mow down the natural order and replace it with an inverted dystopia in which the defining feature is the removal of all constraints on female sexuality and the maximization of restrictions on male sexuality. As in any social movement, the breath of its life emerges first from the sticky goo of the sexual market.

Lies have consequences, and the Big Lies of Feminism and Antiracism have destroyer-of-worlds consequences. They must be fought with a vengeance.

288 Responses to “The Innocent Victims Of Feminism Are Boys”

  1. Mahdi says:

    Alternative hypothesis: sisters suck and only a father can protect their brothers from them!

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Captain Obvious says:

    “those who find SCALE objectionable”

    Could somebody remind me again what “SCALE” means? Thanks.

    Like

    • Sentient says:

      SCALE is a round about reference to the rat experiment (and related studies) wherein at a certain population level it all went to shit.

      Like

  3. jeangray07 says:

    It seems that all of the big evils in this world end up targeting the most innocent among us. I feel physically ill when I think of all of the poor little boys completely under the control of single feminist hags; the really young ones parrot whatever they hear you say. Can you imagine the garbage being poured into their ears day after day?

    Liked by 6 people

    • “Now Rocky, how would you like to stay inside with Mommy and play with the Barbie dolls (which mommy bought hoping you would have been born a pretty girl instead) rather than going outside with all those rough boys who will get dirty and maybe even scrape their knees on the rough asphalt?”

      Arthur Schopenhauer said in his “Essay on Women” (a certified Red Pill Classic) that women do so well with children because they are so much like children themselves. These days, they seem to be even more clueless than the children in their care: their brains are clogged with libtard sewage.

      Liked by 7 people

  4. martin says:

    The article’s got it wrong. It says the problem is caused by capitalism i.e. inequality but that’s always been around and the trend hasn’t occurred before. Likewise it says more daycare is needed. I guess that means more stay at home fathers. Likewise, that hasn’t been an issue in the past and never before has this trend been seen. The women that took those jobs got it because they were women, that’s all there is to it.

    Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      Why do you assume these people are truth seekers?

      Like

      • martin says:

        two reasons really. 1) those people doing the study are academics and I am accustomed to rigour being applied to anything published and 2) because there are plenty of people who nominally support leftist agendas like ‘equality’ but vaguely suspect something is wrong with it. I think politics has to happen and little facts here and there ought to win a lot of support from those types. It wouldn’t even surprise me if this place had people like that visiting just given how ghastly the left is right now.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        You work in science and that is even losing rigour. These people are frauds.

        Like

  5. […] The Innocent Victims Of Feminism Are Boys […]

    Like

  6. Enfant Terrible says:

    The notion that women didn’t work, or were prevented from working, is such a big pile of BS, it’s incredible that anyone believes it.

    The only women who had the luxury of not working, was the nobility, and even then, they still had to run the household.

    Liked by 2 people

    • -B- says:

      “Large, society-spanning movements are as much cause as symptom of social degeneration. We’re splitting vellus hairs here.”

      If a liberty movement had half of what feminism alone has had then individual liberty would still be a popular concept. If we were merely discussing the liberty of individuals these movements would not be as they are.

      Movements go nowhere without help from the people with resources to make them go somewhere. Movements have trouble spreading when capital is decentralized. Movements have trouble spreading when education is decentralized and people not made fungible.They have trouble when their message is not pushed through all the institutions and media.

      These movements favor someones’ interests, desires, plans. That’s why they move forward.

      So these are not symptoms or causes. They are tools.

      Like

    • -B- says:

      Looks like my other reply got misplaced thread wise. What I wanted to respond to this is that ideas about women not working probably came from women to escape back breaking work and hazardous working conditions.

      Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      Funny how most of the heroines in ‘historical’ (= ‘romance’ ) novels are either nobility or girls who are nobility but don’t know it yet.
      Same for Ren Faire reenactors.
      Hardly anyone portrays a farmer, workman, milk maid, seamstress……..
      As far as they’re concerned, the past was only Kings and Queens, the remaining 99.9999% of the population didn’t exist.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well DUH! Any every broad who believes in reincarnation happened to be Cleopatra or Joan of Arc.

        If you’re going to play make-believe, you’re going on an ego trip to start.

        Like

  7. Carlos Danger says:

    Feminism is cancer. You would be surprised how much pussy that line will get you if you really believe it.

    Like

  8. Enfant Terrible says:

    It’s bad for boys to be raised by single mothers in today’s world, because of the anti-male, anti-white propaganda. In the old days, plenty of boys would be fatherless because of men dying at sea, at war, at work, from disease, whatever. But since they were growing up in a world where men were men, and women were women, there was no confusion, and they’d be surrounded by surrogate fathers of one kind or another. Extended family, neighbors, whatever. Nowadays it’s poz on TV, school, magazines, etc. It’s sick.

    Liked by 5 people

    • Captain Obvious says:

      (((It)))’s sick.

      Like

    • Days of Broken Arrows says:

      Talk about being raised by single mothers is only half the issue. The other half is the awful genetics single mothers bring into the equation by often choosing irresponsible, low-IQ men over the smart, stable type of guy women chose back in the “Donna Reed” era. They no longer need to breed with providers since Big Daddy government picks up the tab, so they now have babies with the exact kind of man the women of the ’50s avoided.

      I don’t need to explain to this crowd that both personality and intelligence are largely genetic, do I? If so, I’d recommend “The Blank Slate.” Finally, if male genetics “don’t matter” as liberals claim, then why do liberals demand the sperm of Ivy Leaguers for fertility treatments? Why not just get it for free from the homeless guy in the gutter?

      Liked by 1 person

      • wolfie65 says:

        If the Donna Reed era was so great, why was what immediately followed such toxic slime ?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Stawwoman argument?

        The Donna Reed era doesn’t have much to do with what follows… it’s all just a microcosm of the reality that even the best things can quickly turn to bad when vigilance is not keenly maintained.

        You can take great care of a car for five years, but skip the oil changes after that and see how long it lasts.

        There were many warning us during the Donna Reed era about the coming storm, but most people were getting fat and happy and living large, and the general population of ANY historical time that isn’t an inchoate Republic isn’t known for prescience or discipline… ESPECIALLY during good times.

        wolfie, if you’re trying to play your usual eeyore “it’s all shit, even the good times”, then snap out of it and go lift or something.

        Just because your personal circumstances are shit, stop trying to demoralize everyone else.

        You fairy.

        Like

      • Days of Broken Arrows says:

        “If the Donna Reed era was so great, why was what immediately followed such toxic slime?” Two reasons.

        Because the Hart-Cellar Act of 1965 permanently changed the demographics of this country for the worse. The push by colleges to turn every student into a Marxist was also damaging. Kids didn’t learn to be “anarchists” from the Beatles or Tiger Beat magazine. It was their professors.

        The Reagan Era represented a major pushback from all this and that’s when I grew up. I’d argue that “toxic slime” was at its least influential during the ’80s. To think we used to complain about Yuppies. That was our big problem. Ha!

        Like

  9. Oliver Elkington says:

    I always found it amusing to see feminists deriding Margaret Thatcher because she said negative things about the cause and having an all male cabinet, the irony was that Thatcher espoused all the feminist ideals like getting women to work independently of their husbands and slaving away in the big city for 60 hours a week. She even looked down on working class men such as the miners because they were not like herself. If there was ever a feminist prime minister in the UK it would be Thatcher.

    Liked by 1 person

    • wolfie65 says:

      The more I think about it, the more I’m inclined to believe Mrs. Thatcher was bitter because she wasn’t Queen Victoria, ca. 1870s.

      Like

      • oogaboogaman says:

        Autism is caused by these tarded white women waiting until 35 or 40 yo to pop out a kid. Look at the rates of autism in ooga booga and grass cutting families vs your average caucasoid households.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I’m sure that’s a factor that significantly increases the likelihood of health problems in children… no rocket science there.

        Like

      • oogaboogaman says:

        Yes GE it isn’t rocket science but an explanation that is rarely given for autism disorders, ecspecially for white boyz. Shuck n jive children and back of the house children are probably vaccinated at the same rate as white children courtesy of the white mans generosity. But the big difference is shaniqua and juanita are pushing out their rugrats from 13 to 20s vs the responsible white couple who have to get their doctorate, a house in the burbs and their affairs in order before pushing their 1.3 offspring out.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        And the fact that behavioral issues and lack of attention span and just plain inability to act properly are all part and parcel of ghetto chilluns, so nobody thought about any formal diagnosis.

        Like

  10. tteclod says:

    Serious question: is monogamy a “restriction on male sexuality” or a facilitator?

    [CH: depends on the man. the restrictions i had in mind include such wonderful feminist inventions as “no means no”, consent forms, government subsidized pills and abortions (but not condoms or vasectomies), title IX (restricts natural male preference for athletics by reducing # of slots available to men), rape culture agitprop, demonization of male sexuality, safe spaces, etc. with a little more thought i could come up with a hundred more examples.]

    Liked by 3 people

    • Mr Meaner says:

      Made-up phrases like “toxic masculinity.”

      Which, when you think about it, is often used to describe the delinquent behaviour of boys with single mums.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Robert What? says:

    Don’t forget to include the now almost complete takeover of early childhood education by women. It is extremely rare to find a male in that field. Even more so a non feminized male.

    Like

    • 88 says:

      no. it’s not women who have taken that over. used to be, women would take care of all the early childcare and education until the kids were school or work ready.

      what has actually happened is women abandoning their children and handing them over to daycare centers and preschools that are managed by the government agencies. agencies that oversee and control every moment of their child’s early development.

      today’s women can’t even be bothered to take care of their own children anymore. most of them don’t hesitate for a minute at dumping them off at daycare or preschool so they can go get an ‘education’ or go to work.

      unlike women of the past, they choose to put their own desires before those of their children and husbands. they are told they deserve to put themselves first so they do.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Days of Broken Arrows says:

        Exactly. White women now contract out the raising of their kids to black and brown women. If we have a white future, it won’t look back on this kindly. And who are the men who allow this?

        Liked by 5 people

      • 88 says:

        my girl would never want to do that and i wouldn’t allow it if she did.

        can’t fathom how a mother could feel okay with handing her own flesh and blood off for someone else to raise. women who can do that must have limited or nonexistent maternal instincts and a total lack of healthy attachment.

        probably all the years of taking hormonal birth control has damaged them in that sense too.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Sentient says:

        Who are the men who allow this indeed. They are the guys who would rather have a second car and a week at the beach than have their wife home with the kids. That is about all the extra cash you end up with if your wife works in the typical paper pushing pursuits… And you are de facto cucked by her work husbands and alpha bosses.

        Don’t belive the lie guys. Make her a SAHM and hold her accountable for her work at home since you are her boss.

        Liked by 1 person

      • jeangray07 says:

        Some women start leaving their babies in daycare as early as 6 weeks old! How can that NOT feel like abandonment?

        Liked by 2 people

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I’m pretty sure the rise in autism and all sorts of alphabet psychological maladies stems from children (especially boys) under the age of 4 being left in day care and such.

        All this bullshit about vaccines or foods or everything EXCEPT women not being proper mothers in those formative years causing this phenomenon is just squid ink.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Greg, there is mercury being laced in vaccines for one. Autism and paralysis have emerged after vaccinations for many children who were perviously normal. Day care is barbaric but not the cause. I am not getting my son vaccinated in the US system. Boys seem to be disproportionately impacted by this.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Whatever your feelings are on vaccines, you certainly have the right to protect your own children the way you see fit… but recognize you’re doing so at your own risk and theirs (see link below).

        That whole “autism is caused by vaccines” scare has been proven to be just so much tripe.

        And yes, I’m sure they can trace SOME bad reactions to ANY medical procedure, when there are millions of people undergoing such. It’s called the Law Of Averages.

        The more you know….

        http://www.publichealth.org/public-awareness/understanding-vaccines/vaccine-myths-debunked/

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Greg, there is mercury being laced in vaccines for one.

        Look, I’m no fan of the medical industry, but you’re being disingenuous when you use words like “laced”… the amount of toxins in vaccinations are far below the levels that are often produced or present naturally in the body itself.

        I know you’ve never heard a CT theory you didn’t like, but anything “laced” with mercury would cause death in a vast majority of instances, and that quickly.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Greg, you are deeply naive if you think these groups are not controlled. I am vaccinating my son in the German system FYI. They had to respond to these kinds of concerns many years ago and there is none of the reporting. People don’t make this stuff up as you seem to think. Sorry, but I can’t take you very seriously anymore. You are like the crab in the bucket pulling down the conversation to a level you feel comfortable with. I have little doubt you inhibit discussion here. No exploration of ideas or concepts can go on in your environment because you always have to butt in and prove to all of us you have a settled opinion. Young guys don’t want to comment at all because they are intimidated. You seek to control the terms of the discussion for the sake of validating your confirmation bias and life experiences. You dominate the threads with your inane criticisms and you diminish the board overall as a result.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Your tepid shaming language is just like the “old woman” mode of discussion that you accuse me of.

        And your constant misinformation (I’m giving you the benefit of doubt by not calling it purposeful disinformation on your part) is what make this forum look foolish.

        Challenging nonsense is not “inhibiting discussion”… it’s actually promoting it, as you might have noticed, because few reply to a CT link anyway.

        And even if it did inhibit, it’s the type of inhibiting that would be warranted.

        Try countermanding the issues I take, rather than crying about “inhibiting of discussion”.

        And for the record, I’ve noticed no lack of posting. But we’ve been through this accusation before, haven’t we?

        Maybe if you keep saying it, one day it will become true, amirite? :duickface

        Like

  12. mendo says:

    Buddy of mine’s sister is a single mom. Even before taking RP, and reading this site and getting the low down on all the things wrong with single moms, I knew something was amiss with the kid.

    He was too shy, his speech hadn’t progressed, as he was still babbling even at the age of 5; couldn’t form basic sentences or answer simple questions. And grandma didn’t help matters, as, being a dutiful woman, was catering to the kid’s every need. But that’s just her nature. (Every time we’d all hang out at my friend’s house, she’d magically whip up something to eat.)

    I felt bad for the kid and worse, the girl was shacking up with “flavor of the month”–cool dood–but it was such that the kid would be too attached to the guy and sure enough she dumps the guy. I know that affects kids–first hand stories from men I knew in high school.

    And the kid’s dad was classic jerkboy, though I never met him, but I gleaned enough here and there to know that that was the case.

    It’s a zero-sum game.

    Like

    • Days of Broken Arrows says:

      Two points. First, see my comment above about how genetics matter. Second, you need to actually meet the “jerk boy” you “heard about.”

      Often times, women’s descriptions of men don’t match reality. More times than I can remember Romeo the Romancer turned out to be Romeo the Retard.

      True story. I actually remember one (extremely hot, sexy) redneck woman telling me about this wonderful guy she met: Tall, tanned, etc. I pressed a little more: He’s unemployed. I pressed a little more: He has no schooling. I asked why not? Read the following reply in a women’s redneck drawl: “He caiiin’t reeeeaad.”

      In other words, her dreamboat was functionally retarded. More to the point, she soon produced little ‘tards from this guy. Think about that.

      Like

      • mendo says:

        Maybe jerkboy wasn’t the right term. “Thug” is a better term, now that I see what you’re getting at.

        I’m sure the father’s a sub-90 IQ’er

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        Doesn’t matter that he’s dum as a briq.
        She finds him ‘hawt & sexi’.
        That’s all it takes.

        Like

      • blanche says:

        Idiocracy… opening scene. Nothing explains it better.

        Like

  13. I was raised mostly by my mother.

    And I turned out GREAT

    lzozlzoz

    Like

    • Hugh Jenniks says:

      The pedocrats own Obamacare now. Trump can say “Welp, I tried”.

      My two cents -how about congress also has to live under any healthcare bill that they come up with?
      oh, and repeal EMTALA for the invaders. They get nothing.

      Like

    • joel says:

      I think the R’s should try to save Obamacare by putting all Federal employees into the program.

      Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Trump should really take the next step in regards to immigrants and refugees. Of course, I would have like to have seen him take the Andrew Jackson position towards the leftist half-breed Hawaiian judge, and ignored his order, but know that could lead to a justification (in this putrid society, which is 100x worse that what Jackson had to face) by the Left, and cucktard traitors like McCain, to say that Trump is a dictator who is violating the law and needs to be impeached. I am sure that Trump thought about, and weighed that option, but chose the less pleasant, but more peaceful, road of getting his Supreme Court nomination and take this matter up to the Supreme Court for a hearing to end this lower court nonsense.

      But I digress…

      Until that is done, Trump should make sure that any and all new refugees and immigrants brought into the USA should be resettled ONLY in wealthy liberal strongholds, like Martha’s Rotten Vineyard, San Fransicko, etc. All of their little exclusive hideouts. After all, how can they (the Left) complain about it? They can’t, unless they call themselves out as the hypocrites that the are! It is time for all these liberal bastions to be overrun and destroyed with diversity. Let us take their philosophies, weaponize them, and turn them loose with a vengeance against their masters!!

      Liked by 1 person

      • wolfie65 says:

        Take care of your own health as best you can and boycott, boycott, boycott.
        Eventually, that shittin’ fuckshit HAS to collapse under its’ own weight.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      It’s an interesting take there, on breitbart.

      But to the skeptical eye, right now Trump looks like he’s 0-3, and never before was such glee heard from the (((MSM))) peanut gallery.

      I know there’s a lot of pieces up for grabs in 4D chess, but I’d like to see him get off the schneid, and soon.

      Like

      • tomjones says:

        When the economy crashes and we return to The Antediluvian World (where every human being has to hunt squirrels or gather berries to survive) ain’t nobody gonna be talkin’ about “healthcare”.

        Everyone will learn the hard truth: No one is entitled to jack shit. Not a CT scan. Not a can of beans. I doubt that blacks and other darkies will survive without supermarkets, modern tech and welfare checks.

        Like

      • blanche says:

        With 7 billion people, there won’t be enough squirrels and berries. Let’s just cut to the chase. We need a severe culling of the herd. I’d say about 5 billion people would do it.

        To steal a phrase… Plague rape

        Like

  14. I’m constantly shocked at how “single mother” is a badge of honor. What a coup, slut’s capturing the sympathy used to rightly belong to widows.

    Liked by 2 people

    • 88 says:

      yep, and the ones who brag about how tough they are for doing it alone are usually to blame for the dad being out of the picture too.

      almost every case of a single mom i’ve know who claims the dad is a deadbeat loser or asshole who doesn’t want to see this kids, is actually to blame for him not being around.

      she fought for the house and full custody when they split, got a new guy right away, moved away, made it miserable for him anytime he wanted to see the kids, etc.

      she badmouths the dad any chance she gets and with them never seeing him, they only know him as a some asshole stranger who they don’t even care to see him anymore.

      women who care about their kids don’t intentionally push a dad out of his kids’ lives like that but you see it all the time. and i think they do it so they can play the victim card for the rest of their lives

      Liked by 4 people

      • yep. some women love to play the martyr whenever they have the chance.

        they also get more child support and government aid if they can get the dad out of the picture too.

        they will say they do that for the kids because he’s such a loser or whatever. usually that’s not the case. i’ve seen too many cases of men who fight to see their kids but can’t because the ex made it almost impossible for him. that happens way more than women will ever admit and it’s a sad thing to see.

        Like

      • midnightavej says:

        Sometimes dad is a deadbeat and the mom is still to blame but the poor kid suffers, from a one-two punch of bad genetics and emotional manipulation.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      I’m constantly shocked at how “single mother” is a badge of honor.

      The only thing to do is shoplift the pooty.

      /Show Me The Money rape!

      Like

  15. Laguna Beach Fogey says:

    Don’t blame foreign Jews in Israel for pushing feminism. The proponents of single mommery are also much closer to home, in your social circle, maybe in your family, and can be confronted face to face.

    Like

  16. joel says:

    Boys need a male role model. It’s not complicated. In the ghetto its a gangbanger.

    Like

  17. Tarl says:

    My guess would be that there is no study of boys raised by single dads.

    Like

  18. Anonymous says:

    One of these guys had a father at home, you guess which.

    Liked by 2 people

  19. cynthia says:

    It might have something to do with how single mothers use seem to view their male children as emotional support animals. Boys in these situations often become substitute husbands, doing all the tasks that a husband would be expected to do (except the sex). Making the mom feel good, listening to her whine, fixing things, etc.

    The really fucked up thing about that, however, is that single mothers are a self-selecting population; of the many bad traits they share, they have an inability to deal with men as they are. So they’ll spend their son’s entire childhood trying to teach him how to be a “real” man, or in other words, the man their dysfunctional psychology thinks would make her happy.

    The female hamster is raising these boys. No wonder they’re fucked up.

    Liked by 3 people

  20. Random Guy says:

    Maybe by seeing what various Jerk-boys did to get women and how it didn’t involve economics as much as one would think; all these kids just became bad-boy romeo’s instead of going to college?

    Like

  21. Johnny Redux says:

    I am so happy that my mother was a stay-at-home mother, and that my parents (although not always on the best of terms) stayed together.

    Like

  22. cortesar says:

    hehehe

    Like

  23. cortesar says:

    Watch this peace of the utterly abject agitprop anti masculinity (and anti white) propaganda
    done by MTV and directed by (((Michael Rohrbaugh)))

    Liked by 1 person

    • cortesar says:

      another one
      (((Michael Kimmel)))
      published in a prestigious publishing house Esft & Shekelberg

      E(very) S(ingle) F(ucking) T(ime

      Like

      • cortesar says:

        As Michael Kimmel once said, “Feminism expects a man to be ethical, emotionally present, and accountable to his values in his actions with women — as well as with other men.” It is about time that men take a turn standing up to the patriarchy.
        —————————————————————————————————-
        jeez what about emotionally absent ones like myself?
        How can we redeem ourselves?
        We at least deserve a chance I’d say
        Take my case I was raised as an evil rational being by even more evil Greeks
        My emotional capacity was severely damaged by that old white man Socrates

        Like

      • -B- says:

        “Feminism expects a man to be ethical, emotionally present, and accountable to his values in his actions with women — as well as with other men.”

        Feminism continues to tell men to be exactly what women don’t want in men.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        just wonder if this guy is emotionally present

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Feminism seeks to handicap men to level the playing field, because they know that on many levels they could never compete with men. In fact, except for the ability to have babies, men can do anything that women can do, and usually better (e.g., best chefs are men). The same can NEVER be said in reverse. As such we men are the superior sex. No debating it.

        Like

    • radagast says:

      beta. every. fucking. time.

      Like

      • cortesar says:

        Another one by the same (((faggot)))

        Like

      • savantissimo says:

        Gamma or lambda, not beta.

        Like

      • melmoth says:

        Right down to ‘Beta-Plaid’ in tri or quad colors. I no longer wear plaid/checked shirts unless the pattern is very small. I simply go with one solid color, most of the time, soon to be all the time as my trademark. Large plaid/tartan style has become a huge beta tell. I can offer no explanation but I have noticed it all over the place. It started here and then snowballed;

        (If you can stomach Schumer)

        Like

  24. JB says:

    Hence Plato’s Republic and its rules on barring women from being teachers of boys.

    Like

  25. Truth and Order says:

    Well, Marxism, feminism, progressivism, and many other ‘isms’ are indeed symptoms of a deeper more fundamental force. This force has been – in my opinion – rightly identified by Eric Voegelin by what he calls, “Gnostic tendencies” or “Immanentization of the Christian eschaton”.

    When the history of a people becomes interpreted, by these people, in an eschatological fashion, that is as striving or going to some “end-state” in which everything will be perfect and good (what feminists think will happen when their agenda gets implemented, what communists think will happen after the ‘revolution’, etc.) you get a false picture of how reality is. It denies the truth of existence and it is especially dangerous when it becomes the basis of political action. They think they will create heaven on earth, but instead what we get is hell. They deny human nature.

    This is a tendency present in Western society ever since its origin and it is the dark counterpart of our great civilization. Western society has been greatly corrupted by this type of thought ever since modernity and most of the ‘isms’ are a direct result from this tendency of interpreting the history of our people in a ‘gnostic’ fashion.

    Nonetheless, fighting this requires action on the surface-level as well; feminism itself caused a lot of ‘surface’ problems, Marxism as well, etc. So we have to get into the trench and fight them, but we must not forget the deeper more fundamental forces that drive our civilization – and the dark side it might has.

    Eric Voegelin’s “The New Science of Politics” should really be required reading for everyone here. This rather short book explicates much of what is at play at the most fundamental level of (the history of) western society.

    T.O.

    Liked by 2 people

  26. Jack says:

    While Jews are disproportionately represented in feminism and other leftist BS, plenty of non-jew whites sign up for it too. Sweden, maybe the most feminist nation on earth, has very few jews.

    The true enemies are the male enablers of feminism. Women are herd animals…without male enablers like the pathetic Joe Biden, Tim Kaine, etc., women would be kept in line. The white male traitors (and we all know some) must be dealt with first.

    Like

    • Passer by says:

      Yes, i agree with that. Jewish presence in feminism is stronger in the US. You can see my debate here where i hold the position that feminism in Scandinavia is mostly not caused by jews. I also think that they are encouraging it, but they are not fully responsible for it. Ultimately, i think that feminism is a white woman thing, and that it can not happen to the same extent in non-western countries due to various factors.

      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2016/01/dr-frank-salter-on-germanys-jeopardy/

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      “Sweden, maybe the most feminist nation on earth, has very few jews.”

      LOL’ed. For Chr!st’s sake, tell Yossi Cohen that the JIDF/Mossad has got to stop contracting out to friggin Yeshiva students. Get some G0d-d@mned adults in there, will ya?

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Exactly… they don’t have many Jews, but only a few are enough.

        Pour a teaspoon of sewage into a barrel of wine and what you got now is a barrel of sewage.

        Like

      • Divine Son of Kek says:

        Fuck you, Greg.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Now see, if’n you had stuck by your word and taken a powder from the chateau, you wouldn’t have had that raw nerve hit.

        You fairy.

        Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      It’s not the raw numbers of Jews that is important, it is the fact that to most racially ignorant White gentiles, they blend in to the White scene. As such, it is the influence of those Jews that is important. 1,000,000 Jews working in blue collar jobs would not be a problem. 1,000 Jews, well placed in banking, the government, and the media, is a big problem. A well-placed 1,000 can control the minds and actions of 10,000,000.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        You got it, Johnny.

        The fact that this even has to be spelled out… here at the chateau and in this year… keeps the (((haid a-shakin’))).

        Like

      • Random Guy says:

        Maybe but there’s some aspect to consider that; Jews couldn’t do what they do if there wasn’t “something” already there in white society.

        If their leaders weren’t so corruptible.

        Their men prone to going weak or self-hating due to morality or whatever.

        Like

      • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

        Just so happens the devilspawn in Sweden own ALL the media.
        Control the media and you control the public mind.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Gee, we should have thought about all this before.

      I don’t remember ANYONE here at the chateau mentioning that the traitors of our own kind in our midst should (AND WILL) be held accountable.

      :DUCKFACE

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      While Jews are disproportionately represented in feminism and other leftist BS, plenty of non-jew whites sign up for it too.

      Say there, Sherlock… the chateau already has one Cap’n Obvious.

      Like

    • bolg says:

      greetings, fellow alt-right ((person #1)). greetings, fellow alt-right ((person #2)). lol

      Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      I blame Jante Law. Makes the Scandis fanatically equalist.

      Like

  27. Les Saunders, Protestant says:

    Comment et, of course, as it mentioned “mârriagé.”

    Like

  28. Divine Son of Kek says:

    https://cambriawillnotyield.wordpress.com/2017/03/25/the-wheel-has-come-full-circle/

    “Jewishness is a spiritual disease that can strike any race of people who reject the light of the world. On the cross, while in mortal pain, our Lord spoke of mercy and forgiveness: “Father, forgive them; for they know not what they do.” To whom was He referring? Was He referring to the Romans, to the Jews, or to both? I don’t know, quite probably if we look at it from His eyes, which is hard for us to do, He was referring to all those who did not know who He was because of circumstances that were not solely determined by a willful hardness of heart. But what of those who did know who He was and did willfully harden their hearts? Ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for the modern day Jewish gentiles who have hardened their hearts against Christ.”

    Like

  29. well only two people involved in robbing my sisters laptop i was using 5 years ago are dead
    only peeps that took something i never got back
    karmas a bitch

    Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      another body man they really stacking up

      Like

    • the chick that wrote that paper on my wall od just found out her dude she had at the time odd too the next day
      i gave em 70 bucks to get my sis laptop back after the chick took it out my house but they didn’t come back with it or money went to confront the nog when i saw em again but he pulled out a knife so yea left
      they both dead now though
      i gave loot to another chick to get it back and she fucked me too and didn’t get it
      so yea i guess i’ll be looking for her obit
      life crazy
      think there is some kind of war going on the quiet between out town in town crews

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Gunslinger, I hope you’re not directly involved in this.

        Like

      • Reb says:

        Do you have a dad to talk to?

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        no captain im not
        but its getting like the song let the bodies hit the floor around this place

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        yea i got a dad with masters who was taught bout equality and shit progressiveism
        i told him when i was 17 or so money everything
        he told me no but in last 5 years said i was right
        i told him at 17 the nogs were fucking shit up and forming gangs and shit
        he told me we were all equal and there were good ones or some shit
        look at it now
        he prob agree now
        but hey every chick almost on drugs and a ho
        so theres that prob more natural for bitches and dudes to be fucking everyone and high
        deaths just part of life it happens
        they went out high so prob not a bad way to go

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        dude was like 60 lol prob fucked almost every chick in the city

        Like

  30. wolfie65 says:

    Let’s not forget that it’s always women who suffer the most.
    Like when their sons (or brothers) k1ll themselves……

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      To the best of my knowledge, the topic of Obsessive-Complusive/Passive-Aggressive/Sociopathic w!tches driving their husbands and/or sons to su!cide has never been broached chez Le Chateau.

      I’ve crossed paths with at least three of them in my life, and lately I’ve been thinking back about them a lot, and I’m starting to suspect that they’re every bit as evil as a Ted Bundy or a Richard Ramirez.

      They just k!ll their men more subtly, with their mouths, rather than with their fists. [And they get away with it, too, because the law never thinks to investigate them.]

      Talk about a sh!t test to end all sh!t tests.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I also suspect that with Assortative Mating [s/p the merging of the universities into co-edumakashunal institutions, circa the 1960s], these evil w!tches [consciously or unconsciously] seek out weak manipulable men as targets for m@rrying.

        And if they fail at driving their husb@nds to su!cide, then they’ll redouble their efforts and make d@mned certain that they drive their sons to it.

        Like

  31. gunslingergregi says:

    yea that shit does kind of show woman do get preferential treatment
    if the girls do the same no matter what they obviously being subsidized or don’t need subsidized by the family but get subsidized by everyone else
    if a boy doesn’t get help from family he gets jack shit unless what he makes himself kind of like being a man or something

    Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      or maybe the single woman feel guilty about all the boyfriends they brought home and the son had to look at and they take care of the kid into adulthood
      lot of dudes living with moms and grandmas still

      Like

  32. martin says:

    The left is using marxism to try to understand the situation. Instead of looking at the data and acknowledging there might be a problem, they ‘critique’ the men. Masculinity is destroying men they say. Men are the problem when they are in power, they are the problem when they have no power too. You really can’t make this up.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Martin, the jews will attack you from EVERY POSSIBLE ANGLE.

      You’re writing as though you still believe that they are sincere in what they advocate.

      But they don’t care about any particular ideology which they advocate at any particular point in time – all they care is whether that particular advocacy at that particular time hurts the Shkotzim and helps the jews.

      There isn’t a dime’s worth of difference between Karl Marx and Alisa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum – Marx is just attacking from the Left, whereas Rosenbaum is attacking from the Right.

      But their goal – the subjugation, enslavement, destruction, and eradication of the Shkotzim – is exactly the same.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        tl;dr == Ideologies are simply TOOLS for the jews.

        Weap0ns. Of mass destruction.

        They don’t give a d@mn what the particular weap0n is – sling, staff, sword, spear – they just care whether the weapon WORKS.

        Like

      • martin says:

        well in fairness, I do agree a bit. Obviously after bad news comes out about their own ideas, the left has already moved on to the next attack and covered up the previous errors. If they really cared they might be open to hearing about mistakes. But where I disagree is that stooping to their level is the most effective way to debate them. I happen to think that nothing quite sticks and nothing quite hurts or cuts so deep as the truth. So I will probably tend to go about debating them in that way. Now, it’s entirely a different matter when the left conveniently forgets about things that discredit them. That’s a massive untapped well.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “If they really cared” ——— CONCENTRATE ON THIS OBSERVATION.

        They. Don’t. Care.

        At least not about anything they profess to “care” about.

        What they actually “care” about is subjugating, enslaving, destroying and eradicating you.

        Everything else is just window dressing, chosen to fit the particular occasion at hand and the needs of the moment.

        Q: What do you call someone who really doesn’t care about anything at all? Who has no empathy? Who is a pathological liar concerning any and all matters of ostensible sincerity?

        A: A psychopath.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        > “So I will probably tend to go about debating them in that way.”

        You CANNOT “win” an argument with someone who is “arguing” insincerely.

        You’re dealing with people who lack consciences.

        They don’t care about niceties like thoughtfulness, playing by the rules, searching for Truth, trying to understand a differing point of view, coming to a consensus. They’re only interested in silencing and eliminating you.

        With the most vocal & virulent of them, about all you can do is ridicule them and point out their endless hypocrisies and force them to become the butt of your jokes.

        I suppose that every once in a while, you might be able to pluck off one of the less virulent, via patience and insight and guidance and leadership, and save a soul from d@mnation, but that’s gonna be on the order of a one-in-a-million event.

        Honestly, in this day and age, you’d have better luck via wh0refinder’s methods [just r@pe sh!t outta them, and get them to begging for even more of it].

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “If they really cared they might be open to hearing about mistakes.”

        ever try telling that to a rattlesnake? a scorpion? a chimpanzee?

        hbd, Martin. keep that in mind. it’s the key to understanding all of this. small differences in genetic proclivities lead to large differences when applied globally.

        just because someone doesn’t mean you any harm PERSONALLY doesn’t mean that they’d rather you didn’t exist. genocide isn’t personal. it’s just business.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        genocide isn’t personal. it’s just business.

        Oh, it’s personal, baby.

        Like

    • Lichthof says:

      Masculinity fucked up with unnecessary wars and these wars handed liberalism the western world.

      WW2 let’s be honest…German men got involved in an avoidable war. They could have surrendered on 1943 and kept their government in tact but they went full out on war.
      German women were left abandoned to Russian rapists.

      Vietnam…the huge lifeline and inspiration to the 60s Revolution

      Iraq 2003…again created a generation of hardcore shitlib ism and anti white make feeling.

      That’s why I left the soccer hooligan scene…impulsive violence to prove your masculinity is reckless and I realized I’m not going to jail or die for some loser punk.

      Like

      • martin says:

        well I think it’s a bit of a feminist lie that wars are unnecessary or a masculine thing. Just think of that awful argentine woman who was threatening to invade the Falkland Islands, and she is one of a handful of western female leaders. But I think also the left has done this wonderful job of getting people to think that conservatives had somehow failed the world or even on this blog where male weakness is blamed for the rise of the left or miscegenation is blamed. we forget the incredibly aggressive, violent, ruthless tactics the left has built up for two centuries. They make it seem like it’s all organic, and they are a progressive ‘enlightened’ way of thinking but hide the bodies, the riots, the lying, the manipulation, the cheating, and the utter domination of powerful institutions. In Germany, the nazis gained power left by turmoil caused by revolutionaries that were inspired by the reds and who overthrew the Hohenzollerns. Nowhere is the violence of the German left mentioned, or that the German Empire had no interest in Nazism. So I don’t think masculinity is to blame, we have to remember how cunning these people are. I don’t think wars necessarily are at fault but definitely they were used as propaganda.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “we forget the incredibly aggressive, violent, ruthless tactics the left has built up for two centuries”

        The most aggressive, violent, ruthless tactic which (((the left))) has built up for two centuries is LYING ABOUT EVERYTHING.

        With (((the left))), it’s always disengenuousness, duplicity, and deceit.

        All that (((the left))) cares about is that (((they))) win and the Shkotzim lose.

        Welcome to the great Darwinian Petri Dish Wars – it’s Evil bacteria versus Good bacteria, and the Good are barely hanging on by a thread these days.

        [PS: The very best thing you can do for the long-term survival prospects of the Good Bacteria is MOAR WHYTE BUNZ -> WHYTE OVENZEZES.]

        Like

  33. gunslingergregi says:

    its like this it seems
    the uglier the woman in a species the more t the men have to have to be possibly able to fuck the beasts
    but the prettier the more tech the species gets to be able to defend themselves
    but that doesn’t include living amongst beasts where the same laws of civilization apply

    Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      how the fuck do white bitches have kids with the nogs knowing the kids are gonna look like trolls and shit most of the time
      god dam there were some serious serious ugly fucking chicks out with the warm weather holy fuck
      guess need to get in shape or i might be adding to it

      Like

      • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

        Because their fat, ugly friends on faceberg egg them on when they bring these homely little cretins into the world by liking the pics of these nappy haired little mongrels and telling them how cute they look. A blue eyed baby with blonde or red hair is the most beautiful thing God ever put on earth and nothing will change that.

        Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      high t means you don’t mind sloppy 2nds 5ths 100th’s
      and don’t care it seems though

      Like

  34. Anonymous White Male says:

    “In other words, the lack of father harms more the male child than the female child. ”

    Yes, in the areas pointed out, i.e., “is more consequential for the skills development and labor market outcomes of boys than girls.” Girls that did not have an active father will be retarded in their relationships with future men. They will be looking for a daddy figure. They will ride the cock carousel and they will not look for quality in a male. The reason this is such a negative for females is because their purpose in life is to find a provider and a father for their own children. Since they are crippled in their perception about what a man should be and since they will fill in the blanks with what the female herd says about men, they will invariably make poor decisions.

    The problem for both boys and girls is that, absent a father figure, they will both spend their time searching for a “father figure”. A male can find a mentor. A female will find a dick.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Does ANYONE take that McCain stooge seriously anymore?

      He has the temerity to act as any kind of statesman or spokesman?

      For whom? (besides, of course, the puppet masters who pull his strings and allow him to dance out front)

      (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        He is chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and has a lot of power on the Hill. I am pretty sure he has been the major thorn in Trump’s side so far because he is tough to remove.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well, that’s what this election was all about, in’nt it?

        Does The Hill stymie Trump, or does he drain the swamp?

        I, for one, will be severely disappointed if Trump turns out to be a paper tiger.

        Fuck this ghey Hill.

        Like

      • Putin says:

        “He is chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee and has a lot of power on the Hill. I am pretty sure he has been the major thorn in Trump’s side so far because he is tough to remove.”

        Truth

        Know who the evil is.

        Greg’s bullshit distraction techniques are becoming obvious. As Alex Jones says “know who the enemy is”. That is half the battle.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Pooty’s wants us to worry about McCain, but won’t name the names that pull his strings… the names that matter, but use guys like McCain and their front faces to show the crowd, just in case the torches and pitchforks start gathering..

        And then talks about distraction, go figger.

        Go home and play with your kids.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Guys like McCain can get tossed out any given election year… right now, it looks like some backwater judges and their handlers are the thorns in Trump’s side.

        Tell us, pooty, since you’re such a “know thy enemy” kind of mischling… who are the guys who CAN’T get thrown out of office, and what do we do about them?

        I’ll be over here next to the crickets.

        Like

    • Diversity Is Good says:

      The New World Order is under a strain? Oh, noes! Someone should do something!

      I’m going to have another drink poolside, for a start. Who’s with me?

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I’m amused he has the chutzpah to actually use that phrase “New World Order”.

        The ol’ RiNO’s Freudian slip was showing there. 😉

        Liked by 1 person

  35. Grit says:

    This issue is my blackpill sticking point. You can craft a study that shows these single mother kids to be dysfunctional, but there isn’t a sensible law or rule to punish them. You can’t realistically punish the mother- as long as society kisses single mommie ass- nor can you punish a kid that was born into it.

    All you can do realistically is clamp down and punish non-constructive behavior. Which I guarantee happens all day every day wih these kids. For example, schools should be made to enforce very traditional uniforms, no curving grades, failures are failures, etc

    Like

  36. mmaier2112 says:

    Single moms commit child abuse vs. their kids every damned day. Girls might SEEM okay because they “excel” but that’s only because the schools are ALL made for pussies.

    Like

  37. cortesar says:

    Like

  38. JB says:

    OT, sorry gents.

    Check out the March 21st episode of the Dr. Phil show.

    #Pizzagate is real.

    Try to watch it on an empty stomach.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      What’s the tl;dw version?

      We all know human trafficking occurs… so who did this expose’ actually expose? The torches and pitchforks are ready, the mob wants to know who we’re supposed to go after.

      Or was it just one of those “based on a true story” implanted memories of some dog n’ pony reality show?

      On a side note, what’s the take on this latest Alex Jones apology in re pizzagate CT? For awhile there he was all the rage, here at the chateau.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        You complained about him too much. I’ll double down now. The obvious answer is big powers are very afraid but you already knew that.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        David has some answers. Imagine how dull this place would be without ideological purity contests. You need some more outside interests.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        What I complained about was all the CT promises of bombshells that never materialized… and which still haven’t, as even YOU may have noticed.

        I stopped listening to this David guy the minute he started in with Hillary and her health problems… as I recall, the predictions were that she was ready to drop dead any minute. That was how many minutes ago?

        Truth about all else… if you can’t live by that maxim, or at least respect it, then I can’t help you… and you’re no ally of righteousness, you’re just as big a hamster-feeder as those you supposedly consider the enemy.

        And what a surprise, crickets again on whatever this Dr. Phil show was supposed to have exposed.

        Bring me some haids and I’ll make ’em roll myself… thus far you’re only showing me bogeymen under your collective beds.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Good for you Greg. You argue like an old woman. You know damned well why. You have said from the start this is all too lurid to be true. Why do you concern yourself with it then?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Carlos, stop with the disingenuous bullshit… I’ve told you a thousand times why I bother with it… because lies and exaggerations without anything to back them up are the coin of the realm that our enemies deal in, and just from a purely moral standpoint, not bearing false witness or yelling “FIRE!!” without due cause in a crowded theatre is NOT THE RIGHT THING TO DO.

        Got it?

        Truth about all else… repeat it like it was a mantra, if you would do honour to God and yourself.

        On a personal level, take a step back and ask yourself how you react to a person that promises you something, or assures you X is going to happen… and yet said promises and X never materialize.

        How much of that person do you keep letting into your life, or even your circle of acquaintances? And how much stock do you put in ANYTHING the person subsequently tells you?

        Ever hear of the The Boy Who Cried Wolf?

        Now, if holding our men to the same standard of truth and credibility that God demands of us makes me sound like an “old woman”, then I can’t help you.

        Like

      • Amasius says:

        Really pathetic cowardice from Jones. Won’t watch him ever again, even for a laugh.

        Like

    • skorzecin150 says:

      CD, Thernobitch, really?

      Like

  39. cortesar says:

    Trump Effect: Jewish and Muslim Organizations Form New Alliance

    A new Muslim-Jewish Advisory Council will work to protect religious minorities’ rights as well as other ‘issues of common concern.’

    read more: http://www.haaretz.com/world-news/u-s-election-2016/1.753161

    Like

  40. UKIP says:

    The ideal is to also have at least one grandparent living with you when you grow up and I’m not sure whether civilisation can take the strain of weaker men raised with just a mother and father.

    The important thing is that children are raised in a good atmosphere without much conflict. Happiness, peace and a real appreciation for life are the things that count. In everything.

    Like

  41. bolg says:

    concerned jews are concerned

    Like

  42. Unrelated topic. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that after Trump’s election the media suddenly found a “crisis” to shame white America — namely, opioid addiction.

    This has long been a problem, but why the hysteria now? Who is coordinating this? I think the media blitz has a lot less to do with a new crisis than it does with trying to paint white America as a bunch of redneck junkies.

    And while I’m ranting off-topic, I’ll mention that there is also a major PR push behind Making Chelsea Clinton Important. Out of nowhere, she’s getting articles, awards, news analysis.

    If people think this isn’t coordinated, they’re mistaken. It is. I come from a media background and used to see things like this, but never were they as blatant as they are today.

    Liked by 1 person

    • PA says:

      I come from a media background and used to see things like this,

      How does it work on the level you saw?

      Like

      • Days of Broken Arrows says:

        “How does it work on the level you saw?”

        They assign a story and assume a certain outcome. If you don’t come up with that outcome, they make you rewrite it until you do, or they edit it. What’s insidious about this is that all of it is unspoken and unwritten. It’s a sort of code.

        All of what I saw is much better described in Sharyl Attkisson’s book “Stonewalled,” which I think anyone critical of modern-day media should read.

        Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      My first guess was that we’ll see Chelsea in 2024, but maybe they’ve moved that up a bit.
      Those things have always been blatant, but we weren’t used to looking real close.

      Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      Trump himself talked about opioid addiction. And it’s actually hurting white Americans more than the groids and spics.

      https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db273.pdf (look at Page 3)

      And about Web’s daughter… I’m sure that while the Boosh family is completely repudiated, I could see progs attempting to vote in Chelsea Clinton. Because they’re progs, and progs are stupid.

      Liked by 1 person

  43. Anyone know of a site that shows black spree killers (think Dylan Roof in reverse)? I couldn’t pull any examples off the top of my head in a recent debate. I feel that’s something I should know, since it’s such common anti-White attack line.

    My shitlib family and friends are reeling. I suggest engaging these people rather than cutting them out of you life.

    I was even getting traction convincing people of the Jewish Problem (JEWISH PROBLEM!) from many of my lib friends. Racial and gender inequality as well.

    There’s no putting that genie back in the bottle.

    Like

    • Corvo says:

      AmRen’s Color of Crime compilation of official stats

      https://www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/

      Liked by 1 person

    • Corvo says:

      And I don’t know what you mean by “spree” killing (sounds like another jew-invented term) but blacks makeup a disproportionate share of serial killers, just as they do with all violent crime.

      http://takimag.com/article/affirmative_action_for_black_serial_killers_jim_goad/print#axzz4cOFAT3VB

      Like

      • Thanks for the amren link.

        I guess they’re trying to say Dylan Roof/Adam Lamza, type crap is a uniquely White phenomenon.

        I want to show examples of blacks intentionally murdering Whites on the basis of skin color; where the stories were ignored by media.

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        When shitlibs try to bait you into a conversation about “racially motivated” crime just remember the extremely unfair and unbalanced way those type of cases are identified.

        We had a sitting black-supremacist US attorney general (Holder) on record saying that hate crime laws did not apply to crimes against Whites.

        We’ve had absurdly obvious examples of black on White racially motivated violence — Remember the Whites murdered on live TV last year when the killer left a note saying he wanted to kill White people because they were racist against him (not classified as racially motivated). Or the Black Lies Matter protester who clearly stated to 911 that he wanted to “kill White people” (not classified as a racial hate crime, and Obongo went on TV and flapped his purple lips saying we simply can’t understand the motive behind such “random” acts of violence). Hell, even when the nigs kid napped and live-stream tortured that White kid because they “hate White people” went for a week or two with the cops and DA insisting that there was “no evidence it was a racially motivated crime”.

        By comparison, if the perp is White they’ll be interviewing his kindergarten classmates to see if he ever said a negative thing about blacks.

        It’s all lies and bullshit. Point them to Colin Flaherty’s JooTube channel — they’ll get all the black anti-White violence they can stomach, none of it officially classified as such.

        Good to try to convince them if they’re family, but don’t argue based on false statistics and government lies.

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        And let’s not forget how the half Jew / half spic Zimmerman was classified as “White” when they tried to run him up on “hate crime” with media collusion ….

        … meanwhile St. Trayvon of Skittles, just before he caught a well deserved case of lead poisoning, had just told his negress that he was gonna go bust up some “cracker” who was following him. Not even a peep about whether Tray-tray’s attack on Zimmerman was racially motivated. Imagine had it been a White who moments before attacking a nog has said he was gonna go take care of this “nigger” …

        Like

  44. Carlos Danger says:

    Like

  45. Corvo says:

    “Violence erupts at pro-Trump rally in Huntington Beach”

    http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-trump-rally-20170325-story.html

    lol where my poolside bitches at

    Like

  46. Corvo says:

    “Violence erupts at pro-Trump rally in Huntington Beach”

    http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-trump-rally-20170325-story.html

    lol where my poolside bitches at

    Like

  47. melmoth says:

    Feminists declared war and males were too busy working to notice. (No excuses because all is fair.) Then feminists employed the most cowardly war tactic in human history. They targeted and undermined the children of their opponent (males) and then just waited 30 years. When you can’t compete or outperform your adversary, you attack the children and wait. That makes a crowded market suicide bomber seem noble. So remember how evil and shrewd and ruthless that is the next time you feel any slight pang of being ‘irresponsible’ etc for simply operating from your own mental point of origin.

    Also, congratulations ladies! You win. Your reward: men you’re not attracted to at all. Imagine a gender war wherein the men won by eliminating the secondary sexual characteristics from women. Fifty years later, women have no breasts, hips, doe-eyes or high voices. You win men! Your reward: women with all the feminine charm of Ed Sheeran.

    Women’s reward for winning the gender war; men with nowhere near the masculinity of Rachel Maddow.

    Like

  48. Anon says:

    Everyone commenting about vaccines and autism needs to get informed via the movie Vaxxed. Ive heard thee fucking exact stories ftom multiple parents with kids on the spectrum. Normal development and social engagement, then vaxxed before 2yo, boom…seisures or just plain ol regression. No soliciting here just conversation. Same stories. Give it a watch. There is a serious fucking correlation with autism and vaccination before x amount of months, and the CDC has lied about this. Im 100 percent convinced.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      When hundreds of thousands of children, if not millions, are vaccinated, I’m sure a handful could possibly have reactions not normal, expected, or desirable.

      I’m willing to bet there are also probably a handful of cases where children have actually died, and it possibly could be traced to vaccinations.

      DUH!

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        GE, you need to spend some time at cogforlife.org. Start with this essay:

        https://cogforlife.org/2014/09/08/scpipressrelease/

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        These very same people try to genocide you in other areas of their governance. Why do you beliéve them here?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        GE, you need to spend some time at cogforlife.org. Start with this essay:

        If you want to play the my links versus your links game, we can do that all day.

        Sorry, but the evidence that vaccines don’t cause autism is not merely probable, it’s overwhelming.

        Please don’t try to show me any more of these cut-n-paste websites with essays of anecdotal nature. There are verified medical studies and the vast majority of the medical community that say otherwise.

        And if you think the vast majority of doctors and researchers want to give children autism, or that if there were any credible doubt on the issue they’d do it anyway, well… I can’t help you.

        That’s the one Achilles heel of many of us on the alt-Right… we’ve never heard a CT we didn’t like.

        Medicine, such as it is, is never a 100% proposition… hell, just listening to the drug commercials and possible side effects should tell any thinking person what is obvious.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        These very same people try to genocide you in other areas of their governance. Why do you beliéve them here?

        No, Carlos… the AMA and Red Cross are not trying to genocide me.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        I bet some of you are still railing about water fluoridation and your purity of essence.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        GE, spend some time at cogforlife, and learn what is being pumped into these children…

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Substitute “Soylent Green is” with “Vaccines are”…

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        FYI Water fluoridation is illegal in Germany because it is proven to cause brain damage.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        FYI Water fluoridation is illegal in Germany because it is proven to cause brain damage.

        Fail more.

        In many parts of Germany the natural levels of fluoride were determined to be high enough without additions.

        And riddle me this, Doctor… if fluoride causes brain damage:

        Public drinking water supplies are not currently fluoridated in any part of Germany, however for children and adolescents use of fluoridated salt and toothpaste, as well as fluoride tablets and washes is strongly encouraged by the German Ministry of Health.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        And please, I’m beggin’ ya, don’t even think about posting some org “awareness” link looking for donations.

        The more you know:
        http://www.ada.org/en/public-programs/advocating-for-the-public/fluoride-and-fluoridation/fluoridation-facts

        Dentists want children to be brain damaged, amirite? Make’s ’em more docile when getting their FEWER cavities filled.

        :DUCKFACE di tutti DUCKFACES

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        Greg – flouride in the water supply is sick, you should be filtering that stuff out.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I actually have my own well, but that’s beside the point, isn’t it?

        Like

    • Corvo says:

      I don’t know what to believe on the autism/vaccine issue. We’ve had all 4 of our children vaccinated with the basic vaccines but have tried to space it out a little more (sometimes the schedule around here calls for more than one vaccine at a single visit to the doctor); we also skip any optional vaccines such as the annual flu-shot etc. I’m not one of the people who want to force other parents to vaccinate if they don’t want to, however.

      But I urge all parents out there to take extreme measure to try to shield your young children from electronics and glowing screens of all types: televisions, computers, ipads, iphones, those dorky fucking “baby’s first laptop” toys, and basically anything that beeps, buzzes, flashes, etc.

      Think about it — these young babies and toddlers have unformed brains that are meant to develop slowly, interacting with real world objects in 3-dimensional space (the tactile feel of picking something up, the sound two objects make when they collide, the effect of gravity when something is dropped) and human faces and voices, with their nuance and emotional range.

      Setting aside the all too often pozzed content and subliminal messages in this stuff, the audio-visual assault of all this electronic shit cannot be good for a child’s undeveloped brain. And the screen based content of today is so much worse than before, in terms of crazy pacing and editing and flashes and blaring music and insane whacked out graphics … again to say nothing of poz and degeneracy.

      It’s not easy; it takes discipline and it’s work to shield your children from this type of electronic pollution; no matter how hard you try you can’t stop all of it. But you can greatly reduce your children’s exposure to it. And I think that will reduce your children’s chance of landing on the autism spectrum.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Carlos Danger says:

        We do that too. NO modern cartoons or Disney at all. My daughter sees lots of classical performances for the reasons you state too. Corvo what are the chances you could lobby Congressman Walsh to bring over the Afrikaaners?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        A very good point, Corvo… and one which dovetails into the daycare and leaving children with strangers issue.

        When there is no direct loving contact by parents, or any adult for that matter, at early ages… and kids are given electonic babysitters… that’s a recipe for disaster and all sorts of alphabet mental maladies.

        Christ, at the supermarkets I see two and three year olds already with small movie and game devices in their mitts

        Liked by 1 person

    • Lord of the Gulf Stream says:

      These same creatures are trying to kill you in dozens of other ways, why would you believe this?

      I have a 1948 Encyclopedia Britannica, from back before the pozz set in. It has a whole chapter on fluoride.

      NOWHERE does it say anything about it being good for your teeth, or good for you in any way. It waxes lyrical about how it is the second most toxic compound known, second only to arsenic, and is an extremely effective RODENTICIDE and INSECTICIDE.

      Like

  49. Vanamee says:

    https://a.msn.com/r/2/BByI3f4?m=en-us

    “The idea that a book can turn someone gay or transgender is bizarre to us,” said Sarah Hoffman, who wrote the book with her husband, Ian. “This book is about a little boy who wears a dress, something outside of traditional gender roles, much like the idea of a girl wearing pants was 100 years ago. It’s about following your heart.”

    We should all be like the (((Hoffmans))) and encourage young boys to follow their heart to an emasculated, sexless future.

    Like

    • “The idea that a book can turn someone gay or transgender is bizarre to us,” said Sarah Hoffman…

      She’s right. Her book won’t turn boys gay. What it can do, though, is make them victims. By normalizing boys in dresses, they also normalize men in dresses, and all the behavior that goes with it. Some of it is child s*xual abuse. So they’re making the things boys instinctively run from seem normal.

      The only thing this will serve is to get more boys into counseling, which is one of the left’s goals (and one of the goals of the educational system). Without a steady stream of problem children, the child psychologists, counselors and members of “crisis teams” don’t make any money. They need victims to line their pockets. If they can’t find any, they create them.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Without a steady stream of problem children, the child psychologists, counselors and members of “crisis teams” don’t make any money. They need victims to line their pockets. If they can’t find any, they create them.

        Ain’t that the truth… the same reason that police, lawyers and judges don’t truly care about ‘justice’, they only care about perpetuating the bureaucracy of the system… and our dependence upon them.

        Like

      • Vanamee says:

        Indeed. According to the DSM, homosexuality, transsexuality, crossdressing, pedophilia, etc. are disorders only if the individual is uncomfortable with it. In other words, they are happy to help cure you of a normal, healthy reaction to abnormality.

        Like

    • oogaboogaman says:

      Old news obsolete coal powered female gets her just desserts for not converting to nuclear or solar power. Gotta go green, spaceship earth and all lzzzoooollll

      Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      If people really knew what was going on here in Myrtle Beach they would not vacation here now. Gangs and shootings all the time year round. The media and police quell much of the information. This is not a safe place for young people to vacation. There are some high end resorts here that are beautiful and safe but unaffordable to many. The other hotels on the strip are dumps with perverts trolling all the time. Not to mention the huge drug problem (which is not uncommon in transient vacation spots).””””””

      oh shit yea murtle beach
      they must be bussing nogs in there
      it was great first week then all lined along the sidewalks nog sitting all day all night

      Like

      • Corvo says:

        gunslinger — I know a sweet 20 year old girl moving to Myrtle soon to live with family. Any specific advice you can give about places / neighborhoods to avoid, stuff like that, I’d appreciate it.

        niggers – is there anything they can’t screw up?

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        its a small place
        i didn’t have problems but i usually don’t
        the whole strip street was pretty much covered by beach
        but yea there is the all white area where movie theatre is
        away from the beach

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        ya can pay the big bucks to be away from it but then whats point of being at the beach could be anywhere else

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        lot of decent resteraunts though
        ex ex said noone aproached her offering drugs though
        so that is a bonus i suppose
        it was just wierd with the constant army of black dudes looking single sitting along streets
        but yea going out to places yea not there

        Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      nice thing about it people that paid the 200k for condos years ago and still paying that mortgage
      you can buy a hotel room (condo) for 15k
      so positives too i guess

      Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      my question would be how the fuck they made the nogs disapear then reapear
      after the country music even was over
      like they are put there or some shit
      like on purpose and apparently can be removed just as easy

      Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      were they paid to be there sititng on the walls on the street
      kind of blew my mind a bit

      Like

    • elmertjones says:

      This is nothing. Right now there are thousands of missing black children and why are you not outraged about it?

      http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/03/24/where-are-they-outrage-over-missing-black-latina-girls-washington-dc-police/99573222/

      Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        500k missing people in london nobody talking about either
        shittons of missing in us

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        A total of 242,295 minorities were reported missing in the United States (out of 647,435 for all races).””””’

        can the numbers be real

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        The numbers: Despite representing 12.85% of the population, black Americans accounted for nearly 226,000 — or 34% — of all missing persons reported in 2012. According to the FBI’s National Crime Information Center, the comparison with other racial groups is unfavorable: Whites and Hispanics are a combined 80.1% of the population, but account for 60% of missing persons.””””””””

        pretty unbelievable

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Don’cha know?

        The (((MSM))) would rather tell us about how the priest down the street took advantage of 10 choirboys over a ten year period 30 years ago than talk about how the ghettos and barrios are raping and torturing thousands of their own children each day.

        Like

      • A nig tried to rape me at knife point.

        They’re animals.

        Like

      • I’d take a shower if I were that white chap.

        Like

  50. Carlos Danger says:

    We can’t stop winning. Haribo is opening a factory in Wisconsin! Sauerwurme für Alle! They make sooooo much more than Gummibärs. Now if we can get German jelly candy too…

    Like

  51. Heinrich says:

    B.Age.Perv is back!

    Like

  52. gunslingergregi says:

    fuck no woman and men not equal
    the ex ex went feral yesterday wild out
    and said she made 250 bucks
    what dude doin that
    smoked it all up in crack though dumb bitch
    then back on my back porch sleeping listening to me in house i guess
    then knocked on door
    trying to get loot from me talking bout waiting on me hand and foot and shit
    i’m not giving loot again like that lol
    but a wil out every two months not too bad
    why i don’t fuck the bitch not putting soul into it
    but i’ll take the cleaning and drink refills i guess
    so waiting on me still better than trying to raise loot i suppose
    guess people like to have a purpose

    Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      she wrote me letter
      i just think you were looking for a reason to tell me to leave cuz things have been too normal for you and you can’t handle it””

      i think it might be the both of us at this point lol
      created some drama back to normal what the hell lol

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      “went feral yesterday wild out and said she made 250 bucks”

      Turning tricks?

      Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        yea how she found out and told me bout dude being dead
        also told me her moms boyfriend that died house got robbed after death he had gotten like a 80 inch tv and new comp
        maybe moral to story don’t buy an 80 inch tv

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        was thinking bout getting nice car now thinking maybe a shitty one he he he

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        you would think with technology all crime like that could be pretty easily solved though seeing as tvs hooked to the internets and such
        and comps
        so yea uhh why crickets

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        like they say on expat websites though the people who live are those with a monthly check and needed
        lump sums may lead to sudden death

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        that be fucked up to gt killed over a big screen and comp
        allthough he don’t need em now i guess

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        kind of got the feeling exex in beginning was thinking bout murdering me and taking my crib
        but then she fell in love i guess
        but now not sure hahahahahaha
        she said also an old dude was found in a fire pit where the news said that chick i knew was murdered but they didn’t find her body according to inside info
        so wtf and no news story bout the dead dude who had 140k in bank and shit who was kept till his bank was emptied
        plus another chick i nkow dude told her he had 80k in bank within last year he died
        so basicaly don’t tell a bitch if you got money in bank
        and if do don’t have that shit mailed in statements to house or yea hide that shit

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        or don’t brag bout loot in bank to pick up bitches next thing ya know you in somebodies basement

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        well her moms past boyfriend

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        so game might just save your life i guess

        Like

  53. elmertjones says:

    Science vindicates me.

    Unhappy Confessions: The Temptation of Admitting to White Privilege

    http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1042&context=fpq

    Like

  54. Sikafred says:

    This is the new co-leader of the Swedish Feminist Initiative party. Sweden Yes!

    Like

    • paddy says:

      FI party was founded by … Gudrun ((( Schyman ))) Who decided not to remain in the Left Party because of charges of her ((( tax fraud and evasion))).

      Every.

      Single.

      Time.

      Like

  55. CH,

    You got a shout-out:
    https://identitydixie.com/2017/03/26/thomas-chittums-civil-war-ii/

    “Chittum then expands on the increasing instability and political centralization inherent to multi-ethnic empires, affirming Heartiste’s maxim: “Diversity + Proximity = War.”

    Also, per the topic:

    “Ironic as it may seem, the establishment is actively assembling the very army that will cut their throats. But it won’t be merely for worldly gain or revenge that these young men will fight to their deaths in Civil War II. It will be for something noble, for something basic to higher human nature, no matter how perversely manifested. They will be self-motivated by a sense of purpose, a sense of purpose that is now entirely absent from their dismal and aimless lives.

    These young males of all races have grievances, real grievances, and lots of them. They also have guns, real guns, and lots of them. As the ancient Chinese curse goes, “May you live in interesting times!” Well, I fully expect that the sole virtue of the multi-ethnic American Empire will be a decided absence of boredom.”

    [CH: nice]

    Like

  56. Truth-hammer says:

    I was raised by a single mother. Regards women, I was cucked and blue-pilled most of my life. I never had game (got Asperger’s instead), but was always fascinated with female beauty and thirsted for it. Now, having taken the RedHot-Pill, the woman’s spell has been broken. My view of women is that of Arthur Shopehauer’s knowing amusement. My greatest revelation was the very short time that a woman’s attractiveness and fertility last. I actually feel sorry (a blue remnant) for them for that cruel trick of Nature. Still like to look at pretty girls though.

    Like

  57. Hashed says:

    What is with people here that they think Israel is anything different to the US when it comes to leftists? Do you think Israel doesn’t have all this feminism and politically correctness shoved down people throats? It is exactly the same and as much as you want to bring your anti Jewish agenda into this it just doesn’t make sense to anybody who is familiar with Israel.

    Like

    • Passer by says:

      Used PasteBin because my comment does not show otherwise.

      https://pastebin.com/duShRXCm

      Like

      • Hashed says:

        I could go one by one and disprove to you most of them, not all of them, some are correct. But it will come down to the same point. In Israel 10% of the population are Orthodox jews and 20% are Muslim Arabs. Those two populations are fairly isolated but skew statistics a lot, however for the average secular Jew those things doesn’t matter that much in the same way the Hamish doesn’t affect the life of the average American. For the average secular Jew the stats are much closer to the stats of the western world.

        As you noted, when you guys discuss Jews in America you don’t talk much about the Orthodox communities, you talk about the liberal secular Jews of NY or LA. The equivalent of those people in Israel has the same influence and they push the same bullshit agenda. In Israel it is even more crazy because in many times those people support an active enemy who try to destroy the country.

        Like

  58. […] of Kings abound with articles of accusations against feminism. The current article by Heartiste is The Innocent Victims of Feminism are Boys. But feminism is a symptom of a wider decline in Western civilization. Western decline has long […]

    Like

  59. […] of Kings abound with articles of accusations against feminism. The current article by Heartiste is The Innocent Victims of Feminism are Boys. But feminism is a symptom of a wider decline in Western civilization. Western decline has long […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion