UNLEASH THE TRUMPENING
Oct 9th, 2016 by CH
Posted in Shiv Of The Week, The Id Monster, Ugly Truths, Videos
19 Responses to “UNLEASH THE TRUMPENING”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Donate
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
I don't care if this is a cringe take, I like Patriot Front's optics. The blending of old timey American symbology with National Socialist fasces imagery is an effective cross between two worlds that seem destined to become one.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
eeehhhh....might be too late for a reborn Founder to fix this mess. I'd settle for an Adolf Washington compromise.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
jews are starting to regret the loss of a unifying American culture because they accurately sense that it means a loss of jewish control over an American monoculture.
"let a thousand führers bloom"
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Women who can't handle their depression without killing their kids should be culled from the gene pool. #realvibes
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
The thing with all these pink-shirted libwahms taking up the banner of postpartum depression to excuse a stone cold filicidist is that there is no reasonable evidence nor hereditary logic to believe that PPD among women who have just given birth is common and that the typical instantiation of it is capable of pushing a woman into a murderous rage against her own children.
If such a thing existed, evolution long ago would have culled those women from the gene pool, because nothing is more maladaptive to reproductive fitness than killing your offspring.
In Clancy's case, what is more likely is that she had a preexisting psychosis, perhaps undiagnosed, which was pushed over the edge into a psychotic episode by post-birth depression.
She still should get the death penalty, for the same reason I support the death penalty for murdernigs who are missing an MAOA allele.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
This is the primary contention of men like Joe Jordan and Warren Balogh. They insist that the lib-con dichotomy is not just shopworn, but also a fake divide manufactured by jews, so when jews are exposed as the divisive element in White nations there will follow a coming-together of right-wing and left-wing Whites.
I remain skeptical of this theory, if only because there are real sociobiological and neural differences between temperamentally rightist and leftist Whites, but I agree that the situation we find ourselves in would improve dramatically if the first step is simply removing judeo-prop from our public discourse, and removing jewish influence over our politics and fiscal stewardship.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
I'm sure the jews are hand-rubbing with glee that they have another sex war wedge to drive into the heart of the White race, but that doesn't mean the White woman sympathy for Clancy is faked or astroturfed.
Two things can be true at once: The social atomization and sexual liberation of modernity and collapsing empire are corrupting our women, and the jews are jewzzing to exploit another corrosive effect of modernity to make White collectivism impossible.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Environmentalism was traditionally a right-wing sentiment. It became lib-coded in the 20th century, when it was tied to leftoid shibboleths about colonialism, White racism, and White capitalist greed (which in turn made anti-environmentalism right-coded).
The potential exists for a right-left White alliance on the topic of environmentalism, but only if libwhites can pull the anti-racism scales from their eyes and accept that nonwhites are the primary despoilers of nature.
I doubt that ever happens, unless by some miracle judeo-propaganda evaporates from our culture like a dense choking zog-smog blown away with the prevailing winds.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
I would say that if you're trying to get laid, arguing with her is the last thing a man should do. Arguing with these banshees online until they glitch is just good old-fashioned, spankin' fun.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
That is not true. Or at least it is lacking any important context. Domestic violence rates are roughly the same between male and female perpetrators, but female victims tend to suffer more severe injuries because male perps are stronger.
Women, because of their smaller physical size, tend to resort more often to manipulative, emotional abuse that doesn't make for splashy headlines.
Beyond that correction, I have no clue what you're arguing here. Clancy murdered her kids. No one is arguing that men should have a monopoly on murdering their children, yet that appears to be what you are insinuating with your snarky man-hate.
What you evade is the real story, which is not Clancy herself. It is the outpouring of female support for her that is opening a lot of men's eyes to the foul, blackened hearts of too many of our modernity-soaked women.
-
-
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
-
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
PAGES
Recent Comments
- markgm28 on Ministry Of Twatter
- Augustus on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
- r1verboatgambler on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
- Ironsides on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
- r1verboatgambler on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s PlaceSYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-

NO means NO!
LikeLike
[…] UNLEASH THE TRUMPENING […]
LikeLike
watch her body language. she’s being very, very honest. compare her natural body language to any video of clinton, where every move and gesture is controlled and calculated.
LikeLike
*EITHER* clinton
LikeLike
This video makes me furious.
[CH: if this is the original lara, nice to see you back.]
LikeLike
CRY HAVOC, AND LET SLIP THE FROGS OF WAR
[CH: perfect]
LikeLiked by 4 people
Serious question: IN my mind I still find myself drawn to the Clintons. Like I know all the bad things they’ve done but my mid just doesn’t register it. Why is that? Seeing this woman crying, I can tell she isn’t lying. But when I see the Clintons, I don’t see Bill raping it Hillary lying. There must be some level of split psychosis with Clinton supporters. What is making them stick to her?
LikeLike
LikeLike
Theresa May on Richard Spencer. @RadixJournal @RichardBSpencer #AltRight pic.twitter.com/FmuTrzc8gq
— Bella Sassin (@BellaSassin) October 7, 2016
LikeLike
This is textbook cognitive dissonance. You see the affable, “I feel your pain” empathetic Bill Clinton and form a positive feeling toward him. Subsequently you see the above Broderick video describing a violent, vicious, indeed malevolent Bill Clinton. Moreover her account is not only convincing, it has, I believe, the added advantage of being true. This Truth about the “real” Bill Clinton conflicts with your original warm and fuzzy feeling toward the Slickster. You don’t want what you’ve seen and heard in the Broaderick video to be true, to represent the *real* Bill Clinton because then you’d also have to admit that you’ve been taken in, that your belief about him based on that original feeling was not just wrong, it was way wrong. People don’t like to admit they’ve been deceived and will go to great lengths to avoid recognizing it and admitting it, even to themselves. After all, if you were so wrong about him, what other false beliefs might you have? If your judgment is so defective, then what can you depend on to guide yourself through life? Strong blocks to get around, for sure.
If you can’t see Hilary lying, despite the continual examples (see for example, the WikiLeaks e-mail showing that her *real* support is actually for TPP and Open Borders), then that’s something different and even more profound, akin to the people who thought that the guy in the car rental commercials couldn’t *really* have savagely murdered two people.
LikeLike
Why aren’t I 50 points ahead, you might ask!!!!!!!!!!!!! O^O
LikeLike
I’ll play the devil’s advocate here.
First, why was Juanita Broadrick so foolish as to let a man into her room?
Secondly, why didn’t Juanita immediately after Bill’s departure call the police to inform them that she been violated?
She sounds convincing as she puts on the agony but perhaps she is just a good actress. Actresses who don’t sound convincing are simply not good actresses.
Perhaps she was sexually attracted to Bill and her panty hose was damp from her juices but she didn’t want to ‘go the whole way’ on their first ‘date’ (“I’m not an easy lay”) and would have been happy to settle for ‘heavy petting’, soixante-neuf or mutual masturbation? Perhaps her beef was that Bill ‘came too soon’ instead of ‘arriving on time’, thus depriving her of the orgasm she was panting for?
Perhaps she was ‘devastated’ because Bill — after he spurted 200 grams of high quality alpha male semen into her soaking vagina — had promised to phone her the next day and send her to the moon but didn’t.
We will never know. Truth hides behind its own shadow. It’s ‘he said, she said’ and behind closed doors shit often happens but there is nothing the rule of law can do about it.
LikeLike
Just testing to see whether the comments function works for me.
LikeLike
Trump or not but since when do the manosphere guys believe rape accusations without any proof whatsoever?
Being consistent is the essential trait of a man.
[CH: this is war for survival of the nation. we are using the weapons of the left to crush them to dust. as for the specific case, broadderick is way more believable than for instance “jackie” at uva. and there is an incontestable history of bill clinton having his way with hundreds of women and lying about it bald-faced to the general public. it’s not a stretch to think his sociopathy extended to the bedroom.]
LikeLike
This is textbook cognitive dissonance. You see the affable, “I feel your pain” empathetic Bill Clinton and form a positive feeling toward him. Subsequently you see the above Broderick video describing a violent, vicious, indeed malevolent Bill Clinton. Moreover her account is not only convincing, it has, I believe, the added advantage of being true. This Truth about the “real” Bill Clinton conflicts with your original warm and fuzzy feeling toward the Slickster. You don’t want what you’ve seen and heard in the Broaderick video to be true, to represent the *real* Bill Clinton because then you’d also have to admit that you’ve been taken in, that your belief about him based on that original feeling was not just wrong, it was way wrong. People don’t like to admit they’ve been deceived and will go to great lengths to avoid recognizing it and admitting it, even to themselves. After all, if you were so wrong about him, what other false beliefs might you have? If your judgment is so defective, then what can you depend on to guide yourself through life? Strong blocks to get around, for sure.
If you can’t see Hillary lying, despite the continual examples (see for example, the WikiLeaks e-mail showing that her *real* support is actually for TPP and Open Borders), then that’s something different and even more profound, akin to the people who thought that the guy in the car rental commercials couldn’t *really* have savagely murdered two people.
LikeLike
Tonight: The Trump Knight Rises
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Trump punked the world tonight.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/trump-punked-press-told-reporters-going-pre-debate-presser-walked-clinton-rape-victims/
LikeLiked by 1 person
http://mobile.wnd.com/2015/09/hillary-covered-up-bills-rapes-sex-with-underage-girls/
LikeLike