UNLEASH THE TRUMPENING
Oct 9th, 2016 by CH
Posted in Shiv Of The Week, The Id Monster, Ugly Truths, Videos
19 Responses to “UNLEASH THE TRUMPENING”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Donate
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Convenience and ease are the lullabies sung to Whites as they are swaddled in a straitjacket.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
The kikes didn't "deal with" the Germans. Their Anglo shabbos mercenaries dealt with the Germans. Talk about Stolen Pallor!
Also, gotta love that yid gratitude. "Thanks, America, for your help! Now here's your orchestrated demise in return."
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Also, Mamdani seems to be advocating for highly secure, closed borders. If you aren't from here, then it's "papers please!" before you can buy food.
Funny how that works. You have a single secure border at the national level, or you have many secure borders at the local level.
Either way, borders are the natural order.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
It's fair (and easy) to criticize the idea of Whites being objectively the most beautiful race in the world, premised on the counter-argument that each race has an innate preference for the looks of its own people. One could say that Whites are just as biased as all other races to think their own the most comely.
The problem with this tepid take is that we have evidence that races from across the world strive to look White. Indians love to whiten their skin. Orientals get cosmetic surgery to widen their epicanthic folds. The male nigger can't stop asking "where da White women at?".
Sheeeit, even niglets prefer to play with White dolls.
https://news.ucr.edu/articles/2022/09/29/liking-another-group-doesnt-mean-you-dislike-your-own
While there is truth to the assertion that a racial beauty bias exists, there appears to be a competing truth that White is the pinnacle of beauty in the eyes of all.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Create the crisis (racial diversity, freakshow coddling)
Present the Orwellian solution.
Anticipate backlash.
Remove Orwellian solution, crisis returns even harder.
People beg for the Orwellian solution.
Happily give them what they demand.Meanwhile, the real solution goes unmentioned and the people become slaves of Berg Brother.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
The honor system only works with an honorable people. No Hajnalite Whites, no functional honor system. More diversity, less honor.
So this tracks with an increasing regularity of US election fraud.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Sounds plausible that might play a role, but then we'd see the most facially beautiful women from races which evolved in year-round cold climates, such as the Eskimos. But that is not the case.
I think certain races simply value facial female beauty more than do other races, and that one will find this favoritism in genocultural regions where monogamy became the norm early on, and men and women stayed together for many years to raise children. A man has to like what he sees of a woman if he sees her all the time.
A test of this hypothesis would be surveys asking men from various countries which female physical attribute they most highly value. Another clue would be surveys of sex positions; hypothetically, face-to-face positions would be less common or less preferred among races that evolved a nonmonagamous sexual market.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
He'll change his tune once Bond is black.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
Thousand Points of White
...a brilliant harmony, spread like stars, like a thousand points of White in a broad and peaceful sky.
-
Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides
White faces are objectively beautiful (although Orientals have a stated dislike for the "prominent" White nose).
European monogamy exerted a tremendous selection pressure for female beauty (which was then genetically redistributed to sons as well as daughters), because a man who plans to invest all his energy and resources into one woman, foregoing sexual opportunities with other women, will be very careful about the fitness quality of the woman he chooses.
Couple monogamy with a prolonged culling of European hunter-gatherer males during the age of megafauna hunts, and you have a sexual market in which fewer men have more women from which to choose, and those men chose the prettiest women...this is the evolutionary crucible which likely produced our captivating riot of hair and eye colors.
If you dislike the Darwinian explanation, you may lean on the spiritual claim that Whites are the true Israel of the Lord, and our race was blessed by God.
-
-
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
-
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
PAGES
Recent Comments
- markgm28 on Ministry Of Twatter
- Augustus on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
- r1verboatgambler on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
- Ironsides on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
- r1verboatgambler on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s PlaceSYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-

NO means NO!
LikeLike
[…] UNLEASH THE TRUMPENING […]
LikeLike
watch her body language. she’s being very, very honest. compare her natural body language to any video of clinton, where every move and gesture is controlled and calculated.
LikeLike
*EITHER* clinton
LikeLike
This video makes me furious.
[CH: if this is the original lara, nice to see you back.]
LikeLike
CRY HAVOC, AND LET SLIP THE FROGS OF WAR
[CH: perfect]
LikeLiked by 4 people
Serious question: IN my mind I still find myself drawn to the Clintons. Like I know all the bad things they’ve done but my mid just doesn’t register it. Why is that? Seeing this woman crying, I can tell she isn’t lying. But when I see the Clintons, I don’t see Bill raping it Hillary lying. There must be some level of split psychosis with Clinton supporters. What is making them stick to her?
LikeLike
LikeLike
Theresa May on Richard Spencer. @RadixJournal @RichardBSpencer #AltRight pic.twitter.com/FmuTrzc8gq
— Bella Sassin (@BellaSassin) October 7, 2016
LikeLike
This is textbook cognitive dissonance. You see the affable, “I feel your pain” empathetic Bill Clinton and form a positive feeling toward him. Subsequently you see the above Broderick video describing a violent, vicious, indeed malevolent Bill Clinton. Moreover her account is not only convincing, it has, I believe, the added advantage of being true. This Truth about the “real” Bill Clinton conflicts with your original warm and fuzzy feeling toward the Slickster. You don’t want what you’ve seen and heard in the Broaderick video to be true, to represent the *real* Bill Clinton because then you’d also have to admit that you’ve been taken in, that your belief about him based on that original feeling was not just wrong, it was way wrong. People don’t like to admit they’ve been deceived and will go to great lengths to avoid recognizing it and admitting it, even to themselves. After all, if you were so wrong about him, what other false beliefs might you have? If your judgment is so defective, then what can you depend on to guide yourself through life? Strong blocks to get around, for sure.
If you can’t see Hilary lying, despite the continual examples (see for example, the WikiLeaks e-mail showing that her *real* support is actually for TPP and Open Borders), then that’s something different and even more profound, akin to the people who thought that the guy in the car rental commercials couldn’t *really* have savagely murdered two people.
LikeLike
Why aren’t I 50 points ahead, you might ask!!!!!!!!!!!!! O^O
LikeLike
I’ll play the devil’s advocate here.
First, why was Juanita Broadrick so foolish as to let a man into her room?
Secondly, why didn’t Juanita immediately after Bill’s departure call the police to inform them that she been violated?
She sounds convincing as she puts on the agony but perhaps she is just a good actress. Actresses who don’t sound convincing are simply not good actresses.
Perhaps she was sexually attracted to Bill and her panty hose was damp from her juices but she didn’t want to ‘go the whole way’ on their first ‘date’ (“I’m not an easy lay”) and would have been happy to settle for ‘heavy petting’, soixante-neuf or mutual masturbation? Perhaps her beef was that Bill ‘came too soon’ instead of ‘arriving on time’, thus depriving her of the orgasm she was panting for?
Perhaps she was ‘devastated’ because Bill — after he spurted 200 grams of high quality alpha male semen into her soaking vagina — had promised to phone her the next day and send her to the moon but didn’t.
We will never know. Truth hides behind its own shadow. It’s ‘he said, she said’ and behind closed doors shit often happens but there is nothing the rule of law can do about it.
LikeLike
Just testing to see whether the comments function works for me.
LikeLike
Trump or not but since when do the manosphere guys believe rape accusations without any proof whatsoever?
Being consistent is the essential trait of a man.
[CH: this is war for survival of the nation. we are using the weapons of the left to crush them to dust. as for the specific case, broadderick is way more believable than for instance “jackie” at uva. and there is an incontestable history of bill clinton having his way with hundreds of women and lying about it bald-faced to the general public. it’s not a stretch to think his sociopathy extended to the bedroom.]
LikeLike
This is textbook cognitive dissonance. You see the affable, “I feel your pain” empathetic Bill Clinton and form a positive feeling toward him. Subsequently you see the above Broderick video describing a violent, vicious, indeed malevolent Bill Clinton. Moreover her account is not only convincing, it has, I believe, the added advantage of being true. This Truth about the “real” Bill Clinton conflicts with your original warm and fuzzy feeling toward the Slickster. You don’t want what you’ve seen and heard in the Broaderick video to be true, to represent the *real* Bill Clinton because then you’d also have to admit that you’ve been taken in, that your belief about him based on that original feeling was not just wrong, it was way wrong. People don’t like to admit they’ve been deceived and will go to great lengths to avoid recognizing it and admitting it, even to themselves. After all, if you were so wrong about him, what other false beliefs might you have? If your judgment is so defective, then what can you depend on to guide yourself through life? Strong blocks to get around, for sure.
If you can’t see Hillary lying, despite the continual examples (see for example, the WikiLeaks e-mail showing that her *real* support is actually for TPP and Open Borders), then that’s something different and even more profound, akin to the people who thought that the guy in the car rental commercials couldn’t *really* have savagely murdered two people.
LikeLike
Tonight: The Trump Knight Rises
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
Trump punked the world tonight.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/10/trump-punked-press-told-reporters-going-pre-debate-presser-walked-clinton-rape-victims/
LikeLiked by 1 person
http://mobile.wnd.com/2015/09/hillary-covered-up-bills-rapes-sex-with-underage-girls/
LikeLike