Feed on
Posts
Comments

In a study of paraphilia (obsession with unusual sexual practices), a curious sex difference poked out of the findings. See if you can spot it.

masojism

That’s right, men are over-represented in every sexual perversion except one: masochism. Women are the eager beavers of sexual masojism. It is to LOL.

Any regular Chateau guest would not be surprised by the discovery that women are more sexually masochistic than men. Women are attracted to dominant men, and one way male dominance is exerted is in the bedroom. Women therefore enjoy the masochistic pleasure of submitting to a dominant, takes-what-he-wants man, or will purposely assume a masochistic sex play role to fulfill their need for submission to a dominant, takes-what-he-wants man if such a man isn’t satisfyingly forthcoming with his dominance prowess.

Also, the fact that men excel at all sorts of sexual fetishes is indicative of their inherent “cheap sperm” reproductive status. Men are constantly on the lookout for mating opportunities, and expanding the field of sexual outlets beyond normie sex with an alt-right tradwife widens (heh) men’s scope of intercourse possibility. It is therefore hypothesized by your free-thinking host that very LSMV men will be found at the margins of sexual proclivity, hoping to snag some kind of scrotal relief that they are hard-pressed to achieve the normal way.

This fact is the “is” part of the “is, not ought” equation, and its existence should not be used as justification for social engineering to make sexual freaks more accepted by the general public.

136 Responses to “Sex Differences Crop Up In The Funniest Places”

  1. Captain Obvious says:

    My only thought would be that the [overtly] masochistic chicks almost certainly will not be “M0ther of your Ch!ldren” material. Unless maybe you want your sons to grow up acting like Richard Simmons or Anderson Cooper or Elliot Rodger…

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      So maybe ana1 for the masochistic chicks, and vagina1 for the chicks who’ve got a little more fight in ’em.

      Liked by 1 person

    • carlos danger says:

      Spanking them while they blow you goes a Long way with nice Girls. So does talking dirty to them, like they’re a harem Girl. Tell them that blowing you is a privilege and that many women seek that privilege. This works best if you’re well read.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        But the whole idea is to NOT pervert the Nice Girls – to not sow the seeds of Darkness in their hearts. Nice Girls a perilously endangered species; they’re only good for one thing.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Nice Girls are a perilously endangered species

        Liked by 1 person

      • carlos danger says:

        CO, nice girls still need a shot of bad girl to keep them thinking you’re the man they dream of.

        Like

      • Corvo says:

        Keeping a nice girl nice while applying just the necessary shot of bad girl really is a tightrope. But few things worth doing are easy.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Don’t ruin the nice girlz. There are so very few of them left. Either Bunz -> Oven or else DNFW. You break it, you own it.

        Like

      • carlos danger says:

        CO, if you knew me ten years ago, you would know it is the nice girls that change you.

        Like

      • oink says:

        “For the unbelieving husband is sanctified through his believing wife, and the unbelieving wife is sanctified through her believing husband

        You, Sir, have chosen wisely.

        Like

      • carlos danger says:

        CO, she’s not ruined, not even close and we’re making more nice girls. Nice girls can’t exist without the security of knowing their shit lord poppa has their backs.

        Like

  2. Anonymous says:

    right as usual sir.

    Like

  3. […] That’s right, men are over-represented in continue […]

    Like

  4. “Sexually coercive behavior” is hardly a “paraphilia” among men. They’re saying only 18.5% of men are healthy and normal.

    Low T really is an epidemic. My God. 18.5%.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      Yeah, I was confused by that one as well.

      Like

    • Rusvolga says:

      Yes but with qualification.

      Our natural state is to live in tribes where few men monopolize most of the women. Most men throughout history never procreated at all.

      Like

      • Survivorman says:

        I read somewhere that of ALL men that ever lived.. only ~40% have successfully reproduced. It seems believable.

        Like

  5. From a book on male psychology I read:

    “(Some) men are masochistic in their sex lives, women are masochistic in their everyday lives.”

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Reb says:

    My curiosity is how many woman would like to see their current partner brutalized by another man then taken by the brute. Would this be an effective mating strategy

    Like

    • Rusvolga says:

      Used to happen all the time. We are all children of rape if we go far enough back, and women are natural traitors for the same reason. Also the likely origin of stockholm syndrome.

      Like

    • That would explain the male rape scenes of the hero in the show ‘Outlander.” It’s basically one long romance novel, with all the usual tropes, but I could not for the life of me figure out why women would like (or write) that particular story line.

      Like

    • Vagina dominator says:

      “This is good to know but how does this work is today’s policed world.”

      I suppose it works today in the way that the media and government try to discourage and humiliate White men back while encouraging mud-sharking and betrayal.

      Like

    • digra31 says:

      Heard a (black) dude I know talking about a new form of “game” evolved from the banlieues around Paris. It basically goes like this: directly approach a hottie with a manifestly beta bf in tow completely disregarding him. When she comes with “I’m with my bf”, face the guy and *rough him up* enough to shock both beta and cupcake. Then say “he’s not man enough to defend himself, how can he look after you?”

      I reckon this not only requires massive balls, but also airs of dread, intimidating physical presence, not to mention excellent situational awareness. Hard to see it play up in the field tho.

      Liked by 1 person

      • LP says:

        This is biblical game. Not a “new form of game.”

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        Ha ha ha! Dem bros sho nuff got libely majanashuns.

        So what are the ingredients for this little cuckolding fantasy?

        a) a manifest beta
        b) with a hottie
        c) a coon dreaming about what a tough-guy he is

        Coons. Kings of the world in their own heads.

        I was once walking through a subway station in Hong Kong with a very attractive girl who really liked to show off her really beautiful tits. There were a bunch of Pakistani youths hanging around – as there so often is – about six of them. One of them, playing up to his pals, came right up to my girl and bent forward as if to push his face into his cleavage. Never made it. I slapped him so hard on the side of his head he had to stagger down onto one knee. Then, with the most astonished look you can imagine, he leapt to his feet and as I walked towards his mates, he and they all fled the scene like zombies were after them.

        I can’t imagine what he thought was going to happen. Young guys. Probably treated like mommy’s boys their whole lives.

        Of course, this was Central Hong Kong, not the banlieues of Paris, where I wouldn’t have taken this girl in the first place.

        Liked by 1 person

      • wolfie65 says:

        Not new at all.
        That’s exactly what the mostly Arab (some Black) dudes selling popsicles and soda on Mediterranean beaches used to do in the 1980’s.
        With the especially interesting twist that in some (way too many) cases, the German/Swedish/British/Dutch/other White girl would actually side with the aggressors if her bf tried to do something about it.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Beautiful story VD…

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I don’t doubt that shitskins approached beautiful White girls…

        … it’s the “rough up the bf” bullshit that I dispute.

        Wolfie and others never fail to entertain with cuck stories and anecdotes-that-never-happened. For example: imagine a peon vendor on a swank beach in Europe back in the 1980’s going up to a Nordic hottie and attempting some lascivious display, and when she or the man she’s with balk, then roughing up the man… while all the onlookers let it pass, and the shitshin’s popsicles melt in the sun.

        Yeah, right.

        VagDominator called it… in spades.

        The rest of you clowns are dumbass trolls and/or cucks yourself for giving legs to such nonsense… even if it were true.

        You fairies.

        Like

      • Reb says:

        This seems rather idiotic to me. Eventually someone is going postal and killing you. This isn’t what I had in mind! Certainly a white man, even a foolhardy redneck would not brutalize with such systematic stupidity, but who knows what the latest social idiots are doing these days.

        Like

    • oink says:

      why would you want such woman? that is a no good dark-hearted pos that needs to be cut promptly from your life.

      Like

      • Reb says:

        It would then seem that if women are masochists, then her resistance is really just a call for more pain. This would only be one way of administering it. I have to agree with you that, at least the kind of brutally you have in mind, oink, would mean such a woman is only morally fit to be pimped out and gang banged by a group of ten men.

        Like

    • Spiralina says:

      What a horrible thought. I love my man, I want him to be healthy and safe. Women who think this way must lead very coddled lives.

      Like

    • Spiralina says:

      What a horrible thought. I love my man, I want him to be healthy and safe. Women who think this way must lead very coddled lives

      Like

  7. O/T

    Congrats to any English brahs here, y’all done good.

    Like

  8. Women lie more than men even in anonymous surveys.

    I think the real numbers for women are higher.

    Like

  9. Ponce du Lion says:

    The more we push the is as the solution of the ought -be the greater success chances we have. Nature, the is, is what we are trying to impose. And after all, aren’t all this behaviors bad for civilization and civilization is basic for human success?. So if this is bad for civilization and we have the is as a solution of the ethic-empiric dilemma, we must punish the degenerate freaks… but also for all their sins against our natural rights as individuals and tribe.

    Like

  10. Blackburn says:

    This is basically how nerds colonized BDSM (and also guns), and why there are so gun nerds into “kink” on shitty SJW websites like thehighroad.org and armedpolitesociety.com.

    Chicks dig domination and degradation. Nerds got into that as a way to upgrade their available options for sex. I won’t lie, I did too. It was amazing for a decade and it’s still workable although the gold rush is dying out, ‘normie chads’ are flowing in for the poose at a higher and higher rate.

    Nerds flocked to guns as well, I presume because buying guns is easy and accessible and has a venn diagram with techie/nerd interests that looks like an egg.

    The end result is that we gas the nerds though because they’re continually SJWish. If you doubt me, go read thehighroad or fetlife.

    Like

  11. hans says:

    Oh look, virtually the same number of pedos.

    That can´t be right, everybody knows only men love to rape all the children.

    Like

  12. Hmmm…what does this fall under?

    Like

  13. Johnny Redux says:

    Here’s a good one: Formal government study finds that men would be less likely to use condoms with attractive women. In other news, water is wet.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27315834

    Like

  14. Self-report also plays a factor. Masochism is a “safe” paraphilia for women, yet as an audience to female gatherings of various backgrounds, I’m sure most women exhibit exhibitionistic and sadistic tendencies. Though almost no woman would call her behaviour “sexual” or “fetishistic”. And that STILL disregards the true fantasies, where the actual idea is more appealing than the reality, ie rape and voyeuristic fantasies that would invariably fall short IRL, so no woman will “own” them, instead drawing the line between fantasy and fetish.

    The only true measure would be exposure to sexual scenes via VR versus via TV, whilst a brain scanner measures attraction, relaxation, dopamine receptors, etc.

    Like

    • JB says:

      Part of it is that women aren’t always aware of what turns them on: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/jul/05/what-do-women-want-extract

      Liked by 1 person

      • That’s also true, though that particular article’s merits are reduced as vaginal measures are not the best way of telling. The signs of arousal inside the vagina are actually signs of preparation: lubrication to prevent tearing, blood swell to increase cushioning, retraction of the cervix and upper walls to reduce bruising, etc. A woman’s body will do this whenever there is a chance of penetration, whether it’s desired or undesired, to protect her from harm and infection. The only alternative is denying the situation, trying to ignore it, and suffering pain.

        Likewise, a woman can experience sexual arousal on an external genital level (engorged clitoris and lips] without experiencing the proper internal changes necessary for sex to take place. It’s not fully equivalent to a male erection, basically.

        I think between the measure of social appropriateness, a lack of awareness (or in most cases denial, seeing as any woman can readily find what she gets off on when it’s a porn site and not a doctor that’s asking her] about what we most desire, and a misunderstanding of which physical cues correlate most strongly with our reproductive drive and which are more reactive, it is hard to get real results on what women want the most. Hence why brain scans would be pretty interesting.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Reading all this chick pr0n, I am totally getting jealous of Mr Superslavis.

        Like

      • Philomathean says:

        Nonsense. Experience shows me women want men to take what they want, when they want, and to do so unapologetically. And the vagina will always be wettest in both volume and duration in this dynamic.

        The reverse is true too in my experience. I’ve don’t like when girls aggressively initiate sex. I’ve given in before but I’m never as hard as when nature calls and I want to hammer pussy.

        Like

      • Ripp says:

        “it is hard to get real results on what women want the most.”

        Mostly disagree. Hard only because to measure true findings that could be evaluated with peer review would make the academics brain melt and then even if published would terrify the masses.

        For example, the knowledge and RealTalk of this blog published on CNN would make the earth implode.

        Further to Philomathean’s point: its very clear what women ‘want’ from a man. Its very clear what women are attracted to at the onset of a new suitor and what they ‘respond’ too as most sexually gratifying.

        The issue in itself is that women are wired to not even understand this; not understand, logically, what they most desire and be forthcoming enough to admit to it no matter what the survey mechanisms used.

        The only way, is pure observation and reality from men that have actually bedded many high SMV women, and do so consistently. Not porn actors, porn producers or even beta male sociologists or academia.

        The most sluttiest of women will still proclaim “I dont normally do this, it just happened” after getting nailed hard and good by an alpha cad.

        The most purest and prudest will say the same thing, after being pounded by the same alpha cad using the same type of approach. etc…

        In aggregate terms, its clear what women want. Its documented thoroughly in the archives of this blog.

        Like

  15. Glengarry says:

    Gosh, they forgot homosexuality for some reason.

    I wonder what behavior counts as a paraphilia if 4.6% of men have “transvestic fetishism”. Or perhaps this study was made in England? (Congrats, by the way!)

    I can recall a girl in middle school who, in retrospect, was a strong exhibitionist. Her family moved away the summer before high school; time to start her reputation anew I guess. Anyway, it seems like a quintessential modern female behavior related to attention seeking and attracting mates. I would thus think at 0.6% it was rather underreported.

    Like

    • Mofo says:

      Significantly more than .6 percent of the women I know have actually described themselves to me as exhibitionists. Perhaps I live a self-selective lifestyle; I don’t discount the possibility. It still strikes me as BS though.

      Like

  16. martin says:

    lol, “men excel at all sorts of sexual fetishes”.

    Like

  17. martin says:

    speaking of sex differences, a friend of mine and I had noted that young women seemed to have tattoos more often than not, and there are some subtle exceptions to this, but your average young female seems to be quite prone to getting a tattoo. I find tattoos silly because you can’t really observe them unless quite close and the colouring tends to be very ugly so even if the tattoo itself is a great work of art, which is of course never true about tattoos, it will still look like a maori warrior’s tribal markings. Why are they doing this? I have always known tattoos for men to be a symbol of menace so I apply the same to women and believe the increase may be a result of a desperate attempt to show their toughness and independence when in fact they know deep down they can’t compete with men in traditionally male roles.

    Like

  18. Philomathean says:

    On beefcurtains:

    Had a conversation with a buddy of mine and the topic came up. He said he’s fucked a lot of girls with the deformity. Luckily, I’ve only come across them once in college (I was totally turned off) but have seen many in lowbrow strip clubs. My buddy screws a lot of low class girls so I’m thinking on the whole the wizard’s sleeve must be correlated with low social and economic status.

    Thoughts?

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      re: beefcurtains

      my own amateur field research suggests that girls with the optimal hip/waist ratio and a toned, well-defined pelvic landscape tend not to have them.

      it seems to be a characteristic of less genetically fertile women, ie flatter, less-toned arse, narrower hips, where gravity is generally pulling everything downward.

      it’s a turnoff for a reason. nature is saying “your kid will die in there”.

      Like

      • Ripp says:

        lolz

        honestly though a nasty looking poon is a turn off. cant stand those beefy poons where the clit protrudes way out of the labia and looks like jaba the hut rowing in a canoe.

        Like

    • carlos danger says:

      Beef curtains are not a deformity. What the fuck is up with this? No one ever even cared until a few years ago. I consider this a Topic so stupid it is unworthy of mention. Chicks with Beef curtains are less prone to infection because the pussy lips are a filter to prevent dirt and disease from entering the Body. Bigger lips are actually healthier.

      Like

    • Enfant Terrible says:

      “Beef Curtains” are not a deformity, and whomever classifies it as so, is a prissy little faggot.

      Like

    • Sean Fielding says:

      In Bushmen, ‘Hottentot Apron’ beef curtains may sort with steatopygia (a fat ass). Weird, because I associate beef curtains with high T and steatopygia with high E.

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      actually beef curtains are a real health crisis and are considered a disability by the american slut association. there’s a new reality show coming out this fall where three girls with beef curtains share an apartment in NYC and share their day-to-day struggles trying to be world class sluts. it’s supposed to be heart wrenching.

      Like

  19. Aeoli Pera says:

    Good analysis CH.

    Like

  20. Libertardian says:

    George Won’t shows his true colors.

    ‘George Will, television pundit and columnist at The Washington Post, said he has left the Republican Party, and he spelled out the pro-Hillary Clinton strategy he thinks will allow the establishment Republicans to regain control of the party after this presidential election.

    “Make sure he loses. Grit their teeth for four years and win the White House” in 2020, Will said, referring to what Republicans should do about Trump.’

    Same old shit, pretending that losing is really some Sun Tzu strategy for winning.

    Georgie, you and your ilk are controlled opposition, and the jig is up.

    Like

    • Unfortunately Will thinks that every 4 years each party has a 50/50 chance to win over the electorate, may the best policy argument win. He doesn’t get that our politics is tribal now and he’s in the tribe that’s shrinking.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Amasius says:

        Yep. Cuckservatives are so fucking stupid. As if the Republican party will have any chance of regaining the presidency with 50 million more immigrants in this country should Hillary get in.

        Like

      • Ripp says:

        @amasius

        thats it. whats happened in Cuckifornia is exactly what (((they))) want for the nation.

        damn I cant wait for the wall to be built and the deportstions to start.

        Like

    • Libertardian says:

      Hank Paulson shows his true colors (alternate title: elites have learned nothing from Brexit).

      ‘Hank Paulson, George W. Bush’s treasury secretary, who presided over both the meltdown of the U.S. economy and the subsequent bailout of his close friends and associates, has endorsed Hillary Clinton — citing his belief that she’d be more likely to enact globalist policies on trade and immigration as part of the reason for his endorsement.’

      He came out with this in an op-ed in – where else? – the Washington Post-Op.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        (((HANK PAULSON)))

        Like

      • Tarl Cabot says:

        In 2008, Paulson was Bush’s Treasury Secretary. Reportedly, he met with the leaders of the five largest US commericial banks at the White House, and would not allow them to leave the room (bolstered by the Secret Service) until they all agreed to take TARP money. Who knows what what would have happened if one of them had had the balls to refuse? A suicide, I imagine.

        Like

      • carlos danger says:

        Hank’s just window dressing. He’s from Indiana as I recall and officially a protestant but most likely a Satanist in reality.

        Like

  21. Libertardian says:

    “#Brexit Worrisome Fact #43: The polls were more accurate than the markets. That’s new, and scary.”

    Give me a break. Markets are wrong all the time. Especially when they’re denominated in unsound money.

    Like

    • Libertardian says:

      …not to mention, rigged with the complicity of corrupt regulators for the benefit of (a) connected white collar criminals and (b) State propagandists who see prices as just another means to reassure the sheep that all is well.

      Like

    • martin says:

      the markets move based on information, and the information simply wasn’t known since there were no exit polls. This is actually the third major vote in the past few years where the outcome was unexpected; Scottish referendum, May 2015 Conservative victory, and the EU referendum all turned out different from how polls suggested they would. I talked about it with a friend and he pointed out something new to me I hadn’t heard of before, the Bradley effect, an American’s idea about how white people vote. Basically people aren’t honest about how they will vote. In fact, I read some firms tried to do their own polls to predict markets and failed at it. The pattern in these three votes was that people lied so as to skew it in a more leftward direction but they voted more conservatively. It makes sense, we wouldn’t want to reveal embarrassing conservative ideas would we?

      Like

      • Ripp says:

        some merit to this.

        I go out all the time. and there is surely a ‘silent white majority’. you cant have open conversations about it and in brown/blue hair/femcunt mixed company youll kill your social value by sperging out on Trumpenstein and wall building talk.

        It makes sense many are silently bait and switching in poll bullsh1t vs actual votes.

        I can also easily see polls being skewed artificially to try and sway public group think. probably both factors are heavily in play.

        Like

  22. Laguna Beach Fogey says:

    While enjoying some cocktails at the pool yesterday, basking in the warmth of the aftermath of the Brexit vote, a thought struck me.

    Can we expect certain (((European parties))) to step up efforts to facilitate Muslim terror attacks in Britain, as a sort of revenge or retaliatory “see we told you so” gesture for leaving the EU?

    I wouldn’t put it past them. War is coming.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Certain (((European parties))) are already mounting revenge or retaliatory “see we told you so” gestures ON THE BRITISH POUND.

      The idea that stuff exported from England or investments made in England are suddenly worth a fraction of what they had been worth the previous day is simply ludicrous.

      It’s all (((manipulationism))).

      Like

    • Libertardian says:

      One downside to Brexit is, the elites just learned there is no way they can allow a remotely fair election in November. They’re deluded, yes, but they’re not dumb enough to miss that one.

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        after Trump’s eviscerating speech last week I had the strong feeling that he’s pretty tuned in to the shifting winds. he clearly has the capacity to shift gears.

        if he alternates the bloodletting and humiliation with solid fatherly reassurance game there won’t be any way HRC will ever climb out from under his boot on her throat.

        my guess is that a well-coordinated election rigging is good for no more than 5, maybe 10%. he should be able to top that. i just can’t see him losing.

        Like

      • Ripp says:

        I think Trump is going to slaughter her in the first debate.

        im curious to see how CuckNN and the other jew news outlets are going to try and rig the topics.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “…With this pivot to the general, we must recognize there will be a degree of Trump softening his tone and recalibrating his message. For you autistes out there, this does not mean Trump is cucking himself, nor does it mean that he is in the process of being neutered by Manafort. In fact, not one of Trump’s policy positions has changed. What will change is the language Trump uses to discuss these policy positions. The (((media))) has already started to use this sea change as a means of discrediting Trump by driving a wedge between him and his committed base of support. We should be vigilant of this as a strategy and not poke holes in the bottom of our own boat, which is ultimately what (((they))) want us to do….”

        http://therightstuff.biz/2016/06/27/winners-dont-think-about-losing/

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        also from therightstuff.biz article i linked above:

        “…As we move from one week to the next, with each successive news cycle more replete with attempts to undermine and discredit Trump than the last, try to keep one thing at the forefront of your mind at all times: Our side is winning. We’re not only winning here in America, but we’re winning in Europe too. We will keep winning so long as we have the resolve to do so.”

        Like

  23. Barry says:

    The passive aggressive bitch that is Obama has reiterated his line that the UK …who has always stood beside the US …is last in line for trade deals. These Bolsheviks are going all out to get their one global state and nothing will stand in their way

    Like

  24. oink says:

    Putin called their bluffs, they are losing their grip on the narrative, a small fry like Assad survived their assaults, ((tribemembers)) will freely discuss with one the possibility of the ((Greatest Ally)) switching to the Shia side of the Middle East brawl… [BTW, as long as the copts switch, ((they))’re game]

    fun times. btw, that’s exactly how the commie crumbling unfurled.

    for a more artistic take on the process I recommend “The King is dying” of E. Ionesco.

    Like

    • oink says:

      And that’s not accounting for the ancient chink and bindi civilizations who are snickering at the white troglodyte getting hoist with his own petar’

      Like

    • oink says:

      Oh f**k

      If POZ pushes the English hard enough, they too can go to the Shia side in the ME brawl, with Old Ally Putin and the chicoms.

      Holeee Camoleee.

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        what’s the deal with the chi-coms? how are they different from the (((Bolsheviks)))? why don’t they suffer the equalist/pozzed element the way the west does? or do they…?

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        this is the blind spot of the left: if (((they))) are willing to go cross border to grab third world allies to undermine the nationalists then what’s to stop nationalists from doing the same thing?

        Like

      • Anonymous says:

        one of west-of-urals extraction should really think of chinks as folk from another planet

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Britain does have strong ties with China, including, Hong Kong, of course. The military regulars and noncoms are against war/hostility with Russia.

        Like

      • oink says:

        it is best to think of chinks as a distinct/separate humanoid species

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        In China, the party simply replaced the Mandarins and the Cultural Revolution killed any desire for further equalism.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Chicoms == GOOKS

        Bolsheviks == ESKIMOS

        GOOKS != ESKIMOS

        Entirely different bloodlines. Biological Calvinism therefore warns you to expect entirely different psychologies.

        Like

  25. Johnny Redux says:

    Some good news out of Iceland, History Professor, and political outsider (uhhhuuumm….Trump), Gudni Johannesson won the Presidencuy after riding a wave of anti-establishment sentiment, final results showed Sunday, with nearly 76% (yes, 76%….oldest Democracy in the world) voter turnout. He is anti-EU.

    He won with 39.1 percent of votes, and was trailed by businesswoman Halla Tomasdottir (thank God he beat the businesswoman), also without party affiliation, who took 29.4 percent.

    In other good news for Iceland, their soccer team (all White, all Icelandic) is in the final 16 teams for the Eurocup (soccer), facing England on Monday. Cheer them on, men!

    Like

  26. Johnny Redux says:

    Guess which one is Iceland:

    Like

  27. Johnny Redux says:

    Like

  28. oink says:

    ‘groid set to testify against The Cunt gets his larynx crushed.

    that’ll teach him to flap his gums.

    the ((lawyer)) for the other defendant is (prudently?) putting distance between himself and the case.

    Like

  29. Libertardian says:

    “Peter Spence
    If there’s one thing I don’t want centrally planned, it’s the movement of human beings.”

    You mean like this?

    https://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8968-right-in-rutland-vt-one-mayors-determination-to-bring-100-syrians-to-dying-industrial-town/

    Like

  30. Barry says:

    Watching Nigel Farage’s speeches in the EU Parliament and interviews. The greatest Britain of the last century. He took on Europe by himself and saved his country.

    Like

  31. Anonymous says:

    The United States Supreme Court is a pathetic joke.

    Like

  32. carlos danger says:

    Like

  33. Libertardian says:

    Breitbart:
    “Older people were far more likely to vote to leave the European Union (EU), and having lost the argument, supporters of Remain are blaming them, insult them and even arguing their democratic rights should now be curtailed.”

    ‘This is a democracy, but…’

    “In line with others, political blogger Kevin Drum attempted to dismiss the free will and rational decision making of the elderly, writing: “At its core, this is the last stand of old people who have been frightened to death by cynical right-wing media empires and the demagogues who enable them.”

    ‘This is just a dip in the poz bull market. A great buying opportunity!’

    Like

    • Libertardian says:

      “Wa Post-Op: Brexit is a reminder that some things just shouldn’t be decided by referendum”

      Mask slippage accelerating. Trump should hold this up and say “Hey proles, your betters think you’re too fucking dumb to vote.”

      Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “Hey proles, your betters think you’re too fucking dumb to vote.”

        substitute women/minorities for “proles” and you have the alt-right’s position. seems like everyone has had their fill of “democracy” these days. nature will have to settle it.

        Like

      • oink says:

        I’m with PJ.

        settled it will be.

        Like

Leave a Reply