The SJW degenerate freak mafia shows its true colors. Grounds for banning now include “a different opinion than my own”.
Reminder: These are the freaks who pull the social media strings. Weep for your nation.
They Aren’t Hiding It Anymore
Oct 8th, 2015 by CH
38 Responses to “They Aren’t Hiding It Anymore”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
I don't care if this is a cringe take, I like Patriot Front's optics. The blending of old timey American symbology with National Socialist fasces imagery is an effective cross between two worlds that seem destined to become one.
-
eeehhhh....might be too late for a reborn Founder to fix this mess. I'd settle for an Adolf Washington compromise.
-
jews are starting to regret the loss of a unifying American culture because they accurately sense that it means a loss of jewish control over an American monoculture.
"let a thousand führers bloom"
-
Women who can't handle their depression without killing their kids should be culled from the gene pool. #realvibes
-
The thing with all these pink-shirted libwahms taking up the banner of postpartum depression to excuse a stone cold filicidist is that there is no reasonable evidence nor hereditary logic to believe that PPD among women who have just given birth is common and that the typical instantiation of it is capable of pushing a woman into a murderous rage against her own children.
If such a thing existed, evolution long ago would have culled those women from the gene pool, because nothing is more maladaptive to reproductive fitness than killing your offspring.
In Clancy's case, what is more likely is that she had a preexisting psychosis, perhaps undiagnosed, which was pushed over the edge into a psychotic episode by post-birth depression.
She still should get the death penalty, for the same reason I support the death penalty for murdernigs who are missing an MAOA allele.
-
This is the primary contention of men like Joe Jordan and Warren Balogh. They insist that the lib-con dichotomy is not just shopworn, but also a fake divide manufactured by jews, so when jews are exposed as the divisive element in White nations there will follow a coming-together of right-wing and left-wing Whites.
I remain skeptical of this theory, if only because there are real sociobiological and neural differences between temperamentally rightist and leftist Whites, but I agree that the situation we find ourselves in would improve dramatically if the first step is simply removing judeo-prop from our public discourse, and removing jewish influence over our politics and fiscal stewardship.
-
I'm sure the jews are hand-rubbing with glee that they have another sex war wedge to drive into the heart of the White race, but that doesn't mean the White woman sympathy for Clancy is faked or astroturfed.
Two things can be true at once: The social atomization and sexual liberation of modernity and collapsing empire are corrupting our women, and the jews are jewzzing to exploit another corrosive effect of modernity to make White collectivism impossible.
-
Environmentalism was traditionally a right-wing sentiment. It became lib-coded in the 20th century, when it was tied to leftoid shibboleths about colonialism, White racism, and White capitalist greed (which in turn made anti-environmentalism right-coded).
The potential exists for a right-left White alliance on the topic of environmentalism, but only if libwhites can pull the anti-racism scales from their eyes and accept that nonwhites are the primary despoilers of nature.
I doubt that ever happens, unless by some miracle judeo-propaganda evaporates from our culture like a dense choking zog-smog blown away with the prevailing winds.
-
I would say that if you're trying to get laid, arguing with her is the last thing a man should do. Arguing with these banshees online until they glitch is just good old-fashioned, spankin' fun.
-
That is not true. Or at least it is lacking any important context. Domestic violence rates are roughly the same between male and female perpetrators, but female victims tend to suffer more severe injuries because male perps are stronger.
Women, because of their smaller physical size, tend to resort more often to manipulative, emotional abuse that doesn't make for splashy headlines.
Beyond that correction, I have no clue what you're arguing here. Clancy murdered her kids. No one is arguing that men should have a monopoly on murdering their children, yet that appears to be what you are insinuating with your snarky man-hate.
What you evade is the real story, which is not Clancy herself. It is the outpouring of female support for her that is opening a lot of men's eyes to the foul, blackened hearts of too many of our modernity-soaked women.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
what if their name is thwack?
[CH: they sit in the back.]
LikeLike
And out come the Klansmen! Y’all got the rope???
[CH: not yet. all the rope is currently being used to string up your shitlib white apologists.]
LikeLike
nothing wrong with hanging blacks…cheaper than having to warehouse them as we do now
LikeLike
And sadly that’s what it comes down to: A difference of opinion from the [drone] Hive Mind.
LikeLike
I think that option is about managing report-happy individuals. If they don’t have the “disagrees with me” option they’ll choose something incorrect just so the report can go through. If they can click “disagrees with me” the people at Twitter probably won’t even read the complaint – they have tons of other complaints to go through every hour of the day.
LikeLike
Twitter doesn’t seem to mind ISIS though
LikeLike
[…] By CH […]
LikeLike
I’ve heard that option is auto-ignored by Twitter. They can use it to sort out fraudulent reports.
[CH: why is it even an option then? a sorting mechanism only adds a layer of inefficiency. clearly, the place is overrun with faggot freaks who pee their pants hearing a bit of the ol’ ultrarealtalk.]
LikeLike
Supposedly, when the option wasn’t there, butthurt SJWs would use a different option also used by legitimate reports. The new one is like a stress ball, gives them a button to push and make them feel better, doesn’t actually do anything. Assuming that’s true.
[CH: ok i can buy that. which should tell us how depraved shitlib media culture has become.]
LikeLike
Why not try and experiment to see if this is true? Have Mike C. or Roosh put out an opinion, and get a bunch of people to hit that button. See what happens.
LikeLike
Days of Broken Arrows – people probably report Mike and Roosh all the time.
LikeLike
I doubt it. From another company that might be possible (and pretty funny), but Twitter is infested with SJWs
LikeLike
Yeah I was hoping maybe they put that in there as a trick
LikeLike
IHTG is right; it’s a sorting mechanism that distinguishes frivolous complaints from those that warrant further investigation; the ‘different opinion from mine’ option isn’t so much a p.c. bludgeon or threat, but a way to flag time-wasting emotional overreaction from teens and tweens who use social-media to gossip and flirt but who don’t have yet any critical objectivity sensibility whatsoever…..in fact, that option triggers a robo message that explains that Twitter doesn’t condone abusive replies but cannot monitor non-obscene free-speech commentary, etc., blah-blah…….
(this was relayed to me per an associate who works at a national social-media company in the chicago area.)
LikeLike
(this was relayed to me per an associate who works at a national social-media company in the chicago area.)
He works at a National Socialist media company in Chicago? 😀
LikeLike
Why is it so impossible to start our own realtalk version of twitter. Hard to believe that they have an unbreakable monopoly in this sphere. Let’s get together and start a new version with a 142 character limit and call it klaxon or something. Cheers
[CH: a downside to a realtalk twatter is that presumably there wouldn’t be many shitlibs around to happily troll into frothing rages.]
LikeLike
“a downside to a realtalk twatter is that presumably there wouldn’t be many shitlibs around to” happily troll into frothing rages.”
Build it and thry will come.
LikeLike
[CH: a downside to a realtalk twatter is that presumably there wouldn’t be many shitlibs around to happily troll into frothing rages.]
I disagree with this. If there is one thing feminists are good at, it’s invading male spaces. A “realtalk twitter” would be the first place they’d flock to for two reasons. 1). This particular breed of women are masochistic (more so than most) and actually like the street of being harassed, criticizes, and shamed. And 2). Women don’t live for accomplishment like men do, but instead live for drama, which this would provide.
LikeLike
I don’t think Twitter actually makes money. ” In 2014, it earned $1.4 billion but posted a net loss of $577 million.” That is, for every “sale” of $1 they lose about 40 cents. Let the morons lose their money.
[CH: ad blocking may kill social media. *fingers crossed*]
LikeLike
and then next up, could affordable streaming TV neuter broadcast “news”? Here’s hoping.
LikeLike
>[CH: ad blocking may kill social media. *fingers crossed*]
>*fingers crossed*
Damn straight.
LikeLike
Twitter is a joke. About half or more of their accounts are bots/scripts. Followers can be had for about $200 for 2,000. Something like half Lady Gaga’s followers are fake, and were kicked off. Presumably her management paid for them, most celebrities are the same. Their CEO is splitting duties with Square, also a failure. Twitter thought it would make money selling user data, but that is a joke given the pollution/contamination of bots/scripts. I’ve never bothered with Twitter and never will.
LikeLike
So what that celebs buy false followers? The point is that it is a platform for people to share information. It is all about how you use it.
LikeLike
and not that it’s a surprise but the ‘offensive’ image that got @heartiste suspended is still in abundance on twitter
LikeLike
To be precise, it wasn’t the image but writing a comment about wishing violence on people. Which shouldn’t get him banned either, since it obviously wasn’t a real encouragement to violence. But at least you know that you won’t get banned just for posting an image. People can e.g. post racialist messages and images without getting banned, you just have to make sure you don’t write something that sounds like you encourage violence, however far-fetched it would be to take it seriously.
LikeLike
To be fair, that is just the “report” form and in their actual policy document they say:
“Offensive content is tolerated as long as it does not violate the Twitter Rules and Terms of Service.”
And they go on to explain in detail what violates their Rules / ToS, but there is still some gray area in describing “abuse or harassment”.
Read it here:
https://support.twitter.com/articles/20169997
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
dont disriminte based on race or creed but here is this new 5 thousand page list we do discriminate on and it is ok
LikeLike
Discrimination against creed is still fashionable. But seriously, future hipster types will love them ironically, then for real once they make an emotional connection. They have some great songs. Nickelback sadly, they will always be crap.
Twitter is g*y. I only liked it for linking.
LikeLike
ye creed is good he he he
LikeLike
Jesus. It never ever ends with these people. If you don’t agree with them, they don’t just write it off as you being misinformed. They don’t give the benefit of the doubt like most conservatives do. They actually insist something is wrong with you or that you’ve committed some kind of crime if you’re not with them on EVERYTHING.
I’ll never forget my first encounter with radical feminism. I was in the eighth grade, and we had just covered the women’s suffrage movement. My teacher had us watch a movie (surprise, a liberal using a movie as “evidence”) called Iron Jawed Angels. Long story short:
> Women want vote.
> Women go on hunger strike.
> Hunger strike is serious, so authorities try force feeding the women.
> They use apparatus… hence the name “Iron Jawed.”
> People feel bad.
> Women get vote.
We had a “discussion” about the movie afterward. I took the bait like an idiot. I at one point said something to the effect of “I don’t get it. A hunger strike isn’t really an argument. If someone tells me ‘Do X or I’ll kill myself!’, I’ll just say ‘That’s on you babe!’ My little sister holds her breath when she wants something and we just let her do it because it’s childish and she’ll get over it.”
WWIII ensued. I was sent out in the hall. Parents were called in. Principal was brought into the mess. The teacher never forgave me. She actually suggested to my parents that I had a learning disability. She made sure as hell that I knew that thinking those thoughts was not okay. Other female teachers joined in.
I avoided such issues for the rest of high school and all of college… and then I found you guys. 🙂
LikeLike
Wow! What year were you in 8th grade, and where? At my school (UK in the mid-nineties) the teachers were lefties, as they are everywhere, but it was never that bad. We watched films too (Witness, Forrest Gump), but we were allowed to have our own opinions about them.
LikeLike
holy fucktardation
LikeLike
Take it easy boys. Censorship is a sign of desperation. Lets not forget these losers were the ones crying about censorship not long ago. Many of their own kind are horrified these toads are doing what they claimed they hated. What will happen when people see these Tweets are the same party line drivel they get from Dinosaur Media? Why they’ll do what they did to CNN, unplug and free themselves from the Matrix. The more they tighten their fingers, the more users will unplug from their systems…
LikeLike
Censorship is a sign of desperation.
Unfortunately not. All societies have always had censorship, except the U.S. with its First Amendment for a while.
LikeLike
No, we just need to set up our own – where you have to state that you have a thick skin and aren’t going to whine, whine, whine. And if you do, you’re the one who is banned – simple…
LikeLike
I don’t see that option under the twitter report section. The report section has only three options:
I’m not interested in this Tweet
It’s spam
It’s abusive or harmful
Am I missing something?
LikeLike
ROFL STILL MEWLING THRU BUTTHURT TEARS ABOUT YOUR TWITTER HANDLE BANNED SO LONG AGO SUCH A MACHO MAN LOL
LikeLike