Are you curious what constitutes the daily life of a girl who thinks herself a feminist? An anonymous commenter caught a glimpse of the Day-to-Day Feminist’s paltry, predictable world.
Sitting behind a girl on the bus yesterday, through the gap in the seat i got to see her flicking through her smart phone. She started off browsing Buzzfeed, pausing on an an article featuring melodramatic gifs with woman humour. i watched as she then progressed onto articles featuring makeup and period pain. With a knowing look I went back to my own business. 5 minutes later i looked back and i was met with the word ‘feminist’ on her screen, being edited by her in instagram to make it more eye catching. Shortly after this she began browsing her facebook feed, i payed particular attention as she paused the mindless perusing when pictures of attractive girls came into view to carefully inspect them. The girls were cute and wearing short dresses. I couldn’t see the bus girls face but instinctually I imagined her brow and mind contorting with white burning jealously and loathing.
A snapchat comes in on her phone, she opens the app, watching the 10 second images. She faces the camera towards herself and the dull twilight of the bus is sharply illuminated by a bright flash. she and i look at the resulting photo almost simultaneously, both of us unimpressed by the sight we see. She deletes the image, like a perfectionist artist discarding a painting that has failed to reach the standards of his minds eye. She tries again, same outcome. A third try fails to capture any beauty. She exits the app, putting down the phone, defeated.
I see clarity and ponder the hard truths thought by this blog and feel a sting of pity for this girl.
The Day-to-Day Feminist is the day-to-day girl. That is, she’s the opposite of every principle feminists claim to uphold. She calls herself feminist while comparing her looks to the standard established by beautiful women, keeping tabs on her Facebook neighbors, fulfilling her need to feed on buzzy gossip, and prettifying herself so that she can compete better in the sexual market for desirable men.
Feminists are at war with femininity, so they don’t like this reality about women, which is why they loudly insist “real” women are the opposite of the way women behave when left to their own devices. “REAL women have curves.” “REAL women love math.” “REAL women get raped.” “REAL women slay dragons.”
FYI, the next time you read or hear the words “a REAL woman…”, assume that the opposite of whatever is to follow is the truth.
REAL women don’t confuse obesity for curves.
REAL women don’t much like math and don’t perform as well as men at high level math.
REAL women hardly ever get raped, and the few that do are usually raped by non-white, non-frat boys.
REAL women know that the average, out-of-shape man could easily best them in a fight.
[…] The Day-To-Day Feminist […]
“REAL women get raped.”
This one always confused me. I was talking to my wife about it the other day. We claim women are as strong and capable as men, but they live in an odd dichotomy where they’re also perpetual victims?
Rape culture is bad and wrong and shouldn’t be glorified, women are strong! Not Victims! But whenever we need a generic bad guy for an action hero to beat up, he’s a white man doing something bad (usually sex-adjacent) to a woman – glorifying it in modern culture.
I do not understand the times, nor do I truly wish to. I’m just trying to look after my own at this point.
Nietzsche had women down to a tee. They evolved as a secondary sex; it is in their nature to use their wiles to obtain anything they can from men with no regard for any ideals of honesty, trust or mercy. While men were out conquering/building/exploring, women were waiting at home plotting how they could get their share of the spoils. Little wonder then that we see the manipulative dark side of the female mind at the forefront of our weak and permissive culture. Looking after your own is the best thing you can do at this point.
> “They evolved as a secondary sex” Except that in the Matriarchy-Dominant R-Selected morass, women are smarter and more industrious: FEMALE CHIMPANZEES USE TOOLS, INCLUDING SPEARS, MORE OFTEN THAN MALES WHILE HUNTING, STUDY REVEALS http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3279795/posts
Maybe we inherited our masculiine dominance from our Neanderthal ancestors? There’s a fascinating new possibility that Adam was a Neanderthal and Eve was a Nog [fresh up from Africa]: http://news.discovery.com/human/evolution/first-neanderthal-human-love-child-from-israel-150128.htm
If anything, Adam and Eve were both Cro-Magnon… God explicitly states He created all things “after their OWN kind”.
Geez, stop giving legs to these stupid pseudo-science babblings.
And let’s get off this dumbass Neaderthal nonsense as well… Cro-Magnons arose some 35K years ago, if memory serves, and if any “cavemen” are YT’s progenitors, it’s them.
I love how the discussion here rabbit trails.
Adam a Neanderthal? Idk about that. The etymology of Adam means rosy or blushed so if anything he was probably proto Germanic. The ancient Celts, with a high percentage of Neanderthal heritage, were known for having a matriarchal culture, and were mocked for it mercilessly by the patriarchal Cro-Magnoid Germans and Romans. Greg I think you are definitely on to something; the more group oriented Cro-Magnoids were more likely to fight and die in wars while the more individualistic with higher levels of Neanderthal DNA stayed home, contributing to the matriarchal tinge of the modern West.
I love how the discussion here rabbit trails.
Well, whaddya expect from us Neaderthal-negroid admixtures?
– See, this I don’t get. I said nothing at all about any of this shit. I mentioned that women claim to be victims only when it suits them. Some other guy jumps in with this neanderthal bullshit, and now that’s all we can talk about. who gives a fuck?
Well, maybe it’s because there were nothing to dispute in your original post, so the good Cap’n figured he’d enliven things…
… and, well… you know me… I’m a great joiner-inner. 😉
The idea is that Eve was an African Cro-Magnon Nog, who mated with the European Neanderthal Adam. Or maybe it was the other way around: Maybe Eve was a Neanderthal mudshark who mated with the Adam, the Alpha Bad Boy Nog? The point is that Matriarchal R-Selected races, with lazy stupid men, are fundamentally AFRICAN [not European] in nature.
The actual real point is, Adam and Eve weren’t (ahem) “nogs”… no way, no how…
… unless of course you want to believe that Yakub, the mad negro scientist, created Aryans as punishment to his fellow nogs.
And for the record, there weren’t no Cro-Magnon negroes… sheesh!
If memory serves, most of ’em had an even bigger brain case than modern YTs… somewhere in the 1600cc range.
(((shakin’ mah case)))
So who are you accusing of creating and fostering a “rape culture, Remy?
That whole “rape culture” meme has been shown to be false: there is no such culture except for that of feminists trying to enhance their victimhood status. Rape remains as it always was, an act of individual random viloence to empower a sick mind. It even has very little to do with sex!
So stop it with the White knight posturing on that crap. You’re not getting laid any easier tonite when you let your date read your RC comment!
You have clearly misread my post. I’ll give you a chance to read it again, perhaps read some of my followup comments.
From an ROK commenter:
When you tell an emotion driven group with a perpetual victim complex and monumental entitlement complex that they’re always right, always the vitcim, never the perpetrator and that the world owes them whatever they want when they want it…
guess what happens?
The way out of the confusion is to understand that feminists do not want to give up the social privileges long accorded to women and want to gain advantage politically through government. Presently victim classes can gain a lot of advantage through the political process so it serves them to be perpetual victims. This allows for the passage of laws that restrict men. Much of the special social privileges come through being more vulnerable as well.
So on one side they argue strength and equality on the other they argue victimization and vulnerability. Combined they are aiming to end up with superiority.
Too bad there is no woman strong enough to physically enforce this.
Feminist double standard anyone?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3043754/How-shamed-ESPN-reporter-Britt-McHenry-used-blog-champion-women-s-rights-importance-intelligence-class-beauty.html
Off topic, but might be of interest:
Master the game of framing and reframing, and learn how to make an impact and win a debate.
It’s a free online course offered by edX:
https://www.edx.org/course/framing-learn-how-debate-create-powerful-delftx-frame101x
“instinctually I imagined her brow and mind contorting with white burning jealously and loathing.”
Poor crazy bitch is one Xanax prescription away from running around barking and biting people on the leg.
Thank god for modern pharmaceuticals.
Heh love the screen name dude
The problem with feminism is that men always have and always will (as long as they have a shred of manhood left) need women. Women know this instinctively; the thing is because of the circumstances of modern life they no longer need US. The more men try to pretend that we dont need our women, the more laughable we look to them.
Who do you think runs modern life dipshit?
I don’t see a queue of oppressed wimmin begging to join me on the freezing cold power lines.
We need nothing from them. But they are nice to have around.
Keep telling yourself that buddy.
There’s a part of me that says many of the accomplishments of men were done to impress women…
In short, great creations require their use… and great art requires an audience…
… and lionization by other men only goes so far. 😉
Gig once named some primitive Andean tribe known over there for the ugliness of its women. So he tells a story that one day a young man in that village wakes up and decides to invent the wheel, written language, and electricity. So as he’s eagerly getting out of bed he looks around, sees his hideous womenfolk, and says “nah…” and goes back to bed.
That’s a droll one… which I shall purloin and put to good use at some future date.
Gig once named some primitive Andean tribe known over there for the ugliness of its women.
Would also explain Africans and aboriginal Australians.
Then that Andean’s neighbor got up, saw his own woman, and decided to invent all those things just to get away from her.
And why so many early inventions were Greek.
Way off the mark there I think……
Other than for procreation…..what do we “need” women for?
Absolutely nothing….they serve no purpose other than procreation and serving as a sex object.
I’m sure that they (like you) overestimate their value and importance…hence their hatred for MGTOW.
Perhaps I phrased that poorly, regardless my point still stands. The only thing that matters in the game of life is the legacy you leave behind. White women can take their pick of any man in the world; whereas we are all after the same thing. Unless you find bluewaffle mystery meat appealing.
That is 100% backwards.
Men don’t need women – men just really really want women. Men are pretty miserable without women but any guy without a woman is pretty clear that he would rather have a woman.
Women on the other hand need men or they simply don’t function at all. At the same time they don’t realize that they need a man and fill up their lives staring at their phone which gives them brain dead clickbait and instagram and selfies.
Men want women and know it but will stay somewhat functional without them. Women need men and mostly don’t know it and will completely break down without them.
Maybe it would be better to say and women need each other. Steinem et al has convinced modern womyn otherwise. Lose lose situation.
Thanks to the technologies created by beta men, nobody of either gender needs other people anymore. Technology has made it so that men don’t need women, and women don’t need men. Both genders actually needed each other about 300 years ago, but it is no longer the case. I think that most people of both genders can stay somewhat functional without a life partner.
Men don’t need women, Daniel Pussy-whipped. They are good for a f*ck but little else of real use.
Go make me a sammich, cuz there’s no woman here right now and you have no balls, so you’re an adequate stand-in for sammich-making.
Whatchu doin on a game blog then gayb0y Dave?
You sound like a latent homosexual to me
You really believe that, don’t you?
Men may “want” women, but they don’t “need” them.
>>> The only thing that matters in the game of life is the legacy you leave >>> behind
so, 600 years from now, Daniel, you’ll decide if your life-strategies were correct?
Or you’re planning to critique yourself based on ==your own== evaluation of how your kids turned out?
We’ve already got Mrs Dzhokhar telling us that her two sons were saints.
So, who judges the legacy – and how?
Good questions. I dont know. All I can say is it would comfort me to know that there is someone to carry on my name/genes after I am gone.
Your people seem to think it’s important. Why is that? Why are they opposed to others feeling the same way? Therein lies your answer as to why he wants to have children.
Therein lies the answer to a lot of issues plaguing the West.
I don’t think the Wright brothers invented the airplane to impress chicks.
[CH: no, but that was the desired knock-off effect from their genes’ POV.]
Well, in all fairness, day-to-day living is often uneventful for us all.
Even Humphrey Bogart, on occasion, went to the post office for stamps.
That’s a good point, though it cuts both ways. For example, someone who is considered/labeled “violent” probably doesn’t commit an act of violence on a daily, or even weekly basis. Reminds me of an inmate pointed out to me while inspecting a correctional facility years ago, “yeah, he’s a really nice guy. But one day he just got really mad at his wife…” We can be saddled forever with a label by committing only one act that takes seconds.
Anyway, I think the main thing is that she had some spare time, with the entire internet at her disposal, and what did she choose to occupy her time with? The usual BS stereotypical minutiae you would expect from a person of her ilk.
And I’d bet anything she did that retarded “ice bucket challenge” last year.
Sigh… I thought the image of Bogey ordering stamps was a meaty jest, indeed.
Alas, yet another fallen flat!
We don’t need no stinkin’ stamps!
Well-played, and most droll!
If they ever make a movie from ‘Confedery of Dunces’ – You’d make a great Ignatius Rielly.
Heh, I thought you’re saying this to Daniel
Between you and me, ain’t it a pip how, when trying to sound clever, we always misspell sumthin’?
Teeheehee
“Confedery of Dunces” – LOL! Which one would you be?
[…] By CH […]
No true Scotswoman…
it isn’t just feminists that are living in that numbed out technological haze… i hate to sound like an old man, but kids today basically live through their phones and the apps contained therein.
Go ahead and sound like an old man… it’s one of the few times you make sense. lzlzozlzozlzozlozozozlozl
/jes’ playin’, bro.
Brain-Dead Teen, Only Capable Of Rolling Eyes And Texting, To Be Euthanized…
Shivery is not dead!
As an aside, I had to muster all of my self-restraint awhile back, just NOT to smack a spark off of the head of a young adoptee (Oriental, of course) being proudly introduced to me by his SWPL parents.
The boy was about six years old, had some sort of game boy or phone in his hand, and refused to stop playing or look up as his parents kept at him to “say hello to Mr. Eliot”.
This shiznat – the pernicious effect of technology on the brain and on the human soul – is very likely the most important event of our lifetimes. We may be at a tipping point now where the majority of young white women have become too lazy to see a pregn@ncy through n!ne m0nths to a l!ve b!rth, much less to hang around for another 18 years to ra!se the ch!ld to adulth00d. Parents who give their children xBoxes or iPhags should be shot.
WHY DID STEVE JOBS LIMIT HIS CHILDREN’S EXPOSURE TO TECHNOLOGY? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3269595/posts
You said it Cap. Technology has neutered us mind body and soul. Most people are living in their own relativistic fantasy land totally out of touch with all laws of nature and common sense.
Women = turds
Eloquent and pithy.
You misspelled “pissy”.
idiots like you are the reason why “MRAs” “PUAs” and “red-pillers” don’t get any more respect than the feminists. it’s because you say the same stuff about women that they say about men. Just because feminists are behaving like morons doesn’t mean you should sink to their level.
As I’ve said many times before, when someone is a feminist/SJW take a look at them. Do they look like someone you’d wanna hang out with? Would your value rise by having this person in your life? And the answer is, 99 times out of 100, absolutely NOT. And that’s because feminism and social justice are for LOSERS.
You’ll never see a girl above a 7 talking about patriarchy or oppression or whatever buzzwords are created on Tumblr. And that’s because they don’t have to – They’re gorgeous and men will bend over backwards for them. But short, squat, green-haired girls who are a 3 looks-wise will have close to zero male attention (Any attention they will get is from other losers). Now the more narcissistic amongst these girls won’t believe that there’s anything wrong with THEM, but rather that there’s something wrong with MEN. They’ll project their feelings of worthlessness on all women and claim that men are holding them down. Meanwhile these male “oppressors” are probably buying drinks and doing nice things for thin girls with long hair.
And since they have this inherent narcissism they have to change the world in their image. They’re too lazy/dumb/stubborn to actually put in the work to be beautiful, so they end up claiming that they’re strong and don’t need no man, and then shame guys for liking actual pretty girls. Feminism is nothing but LOSER ACCEPTANCE.
And what does it get them? Nothing. I dated a feminist in my blue pill days. I’ve had friends who have dated feminists. And no matter how proudly they proclaim they’re strong and independent, it’s bullshit. And that’s because feminists cry more than any woman I’ve ever seen. If they were truly happen then they’d have no reason to be miserable. But by being feminists they’re acknowledging that they’re losers, all the while doing nothing to stop being a loser.
Meanwhile these male “oppressors” are probably buying drinks and doing nice things for thin girls with long hair.
You missed “And completely failing to get laid.” off of the end of your sentence.
No he was right.
The guys that the SJW is imagining is so much higher value that’s what she would want him to do. Beta comfort to the max because the men so much better than she is.
Plenty of objectively high value men go after 5-6s because of this very reason.
Hah hah, true. But either way, that’s male attention not being given to the feminist.
Yes, feminism and the new left in general has always been semi repugnant to me, even in my non political youth, mostly due to the fact that it’s acolyte’s are almost always ugly fucking losers. People with personalities pock marked by barely concealed personal issues and insecurities. The guys are stringy and effete and the women are fat and over bearing. I’m sure a good part of me is likely biologically predisposed to liking hierarchical systems and healthy self interest, but egalitarianism and white guilt is through and through a religion for unimpressive losers. It is pure ignoble concentrate for throngs of weepy human trash.
“And what does it get them? Nothing. I dated a feminist in my blue pill days. I’ve had friends who have dated feminists. And no matter how proudly they proclaim they’re strong and independent, it’s bullshit. And that’s because feminists cry more than any woman I’ve ever seen. If they were truly happen then they’d have no reason to be miserable. But by being feminists they’re acknowledging that they’re losers, all the while doing nothing to stop being a loser.”
miserable unhappy creatures who will take full credit for anything good that happens for them but take no responsibility for their bad choices or stupid decisions.
always the blame game when something goes wrong or when they are unhappy. and always depending on other people or external factors to make them happy because they aren’t capable of doing it for themselves. when i get this job i’ll be happy. when we move, i’ll be happy. when i lose the weight, i’ll be happy. but when they get what they want, they still aren’t happy.
they talk big about girl power and independence but are the most needy and dependent people you’ll ever meet. exhausting awful people.
Most people do that, it’s not just the feminists. It’s the MRAs too. And most African Americans/Hispanics. And most WNs for that matter.
If there’s any demographic of people who don’t take full credit for themselves for good stuff and don’t blame other people for bad stuff, it’s usually the people who are moderately conservative, but not fascist.
Yeah, right… WN’s merely “play the blame game” when things go wrong… like cities turning into ghettos and no-man’s-lands… like severely disproportionate interracial rapes, amongst other heinous crimes… like the MSM being pretty much the most powerful force in society, and in the lock-step control of an element who’s life goal appears to be the destruction of all things free, white, and clean…
Need I go on?
Try not to be the Cathedral’s unwitting parrot… and note I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt as to not being yet another usual suspect shill.
All things free, white, and clean…
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Skilling
First reply got et (grrrrrr!).
Tell us, StraponWithin, how digging up one unclean gentile (who was caught, punished, and pilloried far and wide by the MSM, unlike YOUR paymasters) somehow obviates the point you’re trying pathetically to gainsay?
Pretty good overview
Actually, I do keep a few “social justice warriors” in my life. Some of them are useful to me at times. I have 2 self described “social justice warrior” acquaintances. Each of them has a skill that I don’t have. I have them help me out with things I can’t do by myself from time to time.
Yep. A while back some twit on jizzabel wrote a clickbait article “explaining” why betas loathe feminazism. Fact is, alphas would hate it too, if they could be bothered to think about it. But they’re too busy banging hot women – in other words, women who likewise have no time or reason to pay more than lip service to feminazism (though they’re happy enough to reap the benefits).
Exactly. I had dated a girl who was relatively feminine, came from an OK family by modern American standards (her father was a spineless SWPL but at least still in her life), and actually cooked and knew when to shut up.
However, her entire social circle consisted of SJWs, YKWs, butch feminists, mystery meat mixes and people whose gender I literally could not identify.
In more sane times, a strong man could take a less-than-perfect girl and mold her into wife and mother material. He could lead her by example and try to limit the negative influences in her life. Today, trash culture is seeping out of every pour of America and makes men (in women’s eyes) nothing more than interchangeable accessories. What positive influence does a decent man have when almost every other person in a woman’s life is leading her astray?
“Feminists are at war with femininity…” that sums them up perfectly
I believe you meant “feminists are at war with humanity.” IME, they’re bitter and filled with hate for everything.
“She calls herself feminist while comparing her looks to the standard established by beautiful women”
CH – you surprise me. Surely the standard has been set by men…
Which men?
The fashion industry is dominated by gay men.
Watch a clip from a Paris fashion show or any fashion show and ask yourself if you, as a sensible heterosexual man, would promote that type of fashion and image as a standard for a woman/women in your life.
I’ll make it easier: do you really think standards for women such as Kim Kardashian are being set and promoted by heterosexual men who are interested in long-term relationships and family values?
Me neither.
Ease up there Wunder…
Women know what women turn guys on… that’s their competition after all. Check out the cover of any Cosmo or similar mag directed at women etc… A real hetero (using that word is gay BTW) man wont have any trouble with any of ’em…
>> The fashion industry is dominated by gay men
1. no – the notorious NAMES are of gay men. And hardly any of the items from the “fashion shows” are ==worn in real life by real people==
2. you don’t know much about the rag trade. The real makhers in that line, spend more time updating their rolodex’s to reflect the latest fax number of their sub-contract’ed factory in Bangladesh, than in worrying about fashions. The “Fashion” social-construct is kept alive by men who are clever enough to rent-seek by extracting disposable income from women. Which is more clever than most men on this board.
3. If females couldn’t piss away your money on branded fashion garments – they would otherwise be pissing away on ADDITIONAL pastries at the Starbucks at the mall. So thank those fruits in the fashion biz, otherwise your fat wife would be even fatter.
3 is dubious. They might spend that money on personal trainers
That’s their whole lives right there. App to app, site to site. Not much else.
I say so what to this thinking. Really so what? You know women follow herds and need to be led. So so what? Who cares what she does when she isn’t with you, it’s how she acts when she is with you that matters. It’s up to you to enforce that. If you want to have deep conversations about things, logical discussions etc. you should be talking with guys anyway.
If guys just thought of all women as silly, pretty little girls they would have a fraction of the trouble they find themselves in.
Lighten up.
White people who act like they are black and think that is cool look stupid.
Yeah, ’twas just a general comment.
“silly, pretty little girls” or “vain, stupid little whores”? There is a debate on female agency
Thats my life too. Chateau to The Rational Male, vagina to vagina. Not much else.
The only time I let the woman I happen to be with at the moment use her phone is when I’m curious about something and want an immediate google for the info… so I can return to my usual state of equanimity.
Sometimes I wish I were single solely for the opportunity to go on a date with a younger girl and telling her to put away her iPhone.
This has been one of the greatest things I’ve read in a while. So sublimely simple.
Many wives I observe with their husbands do the same thing…. on the phone most of the time.
You’d never say that to a young girl … You’d text her
Droll.
What if she doesn’t have an iPhone?
“REAL women hardly ever get raped, and the few that do are usually raped by non-white, non-frat boys.”
Rape culture is the sound of a million women going on the pill together
Bodies feel pregnant (how the pill functions) + Hearts know they’re not getting love (f/m ratio > 60%) = Must have been raped
THE BIRTH CONTROL PILL SHRINKS WOMEN’S BRAINS AND INCREASES RISK OF CROHN’S DISEASE: NEW STUDIES https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/the-birth-control-pill-shrinks-womens-brains-and-increases-risk-of-crohns-d
Just had a meeting with some top corporate clients – about 10 people of which 7 were women. While we were waiting for the meeting to start the women started talking about some 1980s movie and one lady says such and such an actor is so cute. The Feminine Imperative. If the roles were reversed and I said some actress was hot before a corporate meeting, I’d probably get my wrist slapped.
Ladies stopped being cute in the ’80s
Heather Thomas FTW!
Any American feminist that does not spend her free weekend protesting in front of Saudi or Israel Embassy in Washington is either Islamophobic or Anti-Semitic. Go Isthars!
The pinnacle of Western feminism-
Oh, no. Not the dreaded “real woman” drivel. Has anyone considered that “real women” get raped because they’re not supposed to be out slaying dragons- they’re supposed to be safe in the towers their parents locked them away in. Jeez. Any real woman would know that!
Yeah, I just totes lurv being told how to be a “real women” by girlz who, like, don’t even have a master’s degree yet. HAHAHAHAHA 🙂
(“when left to their own devices” clever)
Real women should be seen and not heard.
Real women should be obscene and not heard!
“Real women” take five years just to get a lit degree because they have to take time off to make Harry Potter movies.
“Real women” have to loudly boast about their achievements because, otherwise, no one would listen to them.
“Real women” fall on themselves and break their ankles. 🙁
Rare few women see their application to the GasButtox Institute (GI) accepted.
Kate was accepted. She positioned her nose at the right distance and angle, before the blast. From this, she received :
Hair straightening.
Teeth whitening from the ultrasonic effect
Blackhead removal from the nose
Unwanted facial hair was seared off.
Deeeeeeeeeeeeeep aromatherapy.
Free heat during this cold winter.
All this for just $5000. A better combo-deal does not exist, but it is available to a fortunate few applicants.
-GB
“Real women” are celebrated on Father’s Day because they failed to be good mothers.
The newcomers are on their way to America and the doors on all borders are willingly opened them, even to the soldier in the army. Only on again! The faster, the better! I think that some day America will have so many Semites that they (the Semites) will be looked upon the same as the colored, the black, yellow, and brown races.
“Imagine for a moment that there were no Semites in Europe. Would the tragedy be so terrible now? Hardly! They have stirred up the people in all countries, have incited them to war, revolution and communism. They believe in the saying that ‘there is good fishing in troubled waters.’
“But enough of ‘the chosen people.’ Some day they will reap what they have sown … .
“… . Another picture — Every three or four days a ‘razzia’ (domiciliary search, graze) is being conducted in the city. Terror, fear and oppression drive the people from the streets, looking for hiding places. The people do not work, eat or sleep. Only stamping, cursing patrouilles are seen on the streets with their victims. In this manner 200 or 300 persons are often driven together: former civil and military officials, teachers, landlords, business men, and so on (only Christians, seldom Jews); among them also women. This group is then led to the ‘Tschreswytschaika.’ In front of the group are 40 to 50 armed red guards, infantry and on horses, right and left about the same number of guards, in the rear several carriages or an automobile with machine gun.
Lolzlolzlolzlolz
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-04-17/compare-and-contrast-putin-vs-draghi
Alpha?
“hey, I wasn’t just shtupping inexpensive asian teenagers…. I was ==empowering== them”!
http://www.andrewstanbridge.com/about
Steve Sailer’s Law of Female Journalism: “The most heartfelt articles by female journalists tend to be demands that social values be overturned in order that, Come the Revolution, the journalist herself will be considered hotter-looking.”
MGTOW at least temporarily can be wise. Get your shit together. Start living your life again, for yourself. Get fit, get your finances back on track. The women will probably follow unless you are a complete dweeb. So many guys I know get caught up fulfilling the dreams of their wives. The wives aren’t going to curb their spending so the guys end up cutting their own spending to balance the books and slowly they start living for their wives and for the kids. He ends up looking boring. Avoid this. Lose-lose.
Good advice
BRAMAN == YKW
SEAY == YKW
Is Marco Rubio the descendant of Sephardic chattel-slave traders in Cuba?!?
‘FYI, the next time you read or hear the words “a REAL woman…”, assume that the opposite of whatever is to follow is the truth.’
Same thing when they say ‘a REAL man’.
Rory Miller’s -Meditations on Violence- good read on ev psych and innate behavioral diffs btw genders
The criteria proposed to qualify REAL women is getting more bizarre. It somehow reminds me of the badges that girl scouts collect in order to show accomplishment.. A badge for rape, abortion, abuse – perhaps degrees in this case, escalating from emotional to verbal to the coveted physical – a full sash of dreadful accomplishments on full display.
I’m not at all sure but I think badges of ye older days were earned for meaningful accomplishments such as sewing or cooking. Guess all those old badges can be passed on to the boy scouts.
Hey, I love reading your blog, so I’ve nominated you for the Versatile Blogger Award. https://toddsmidt.wordpress.com/2015/04/20/versatile-blogger-award/
The Feminist: Wolf whistles are just demeaning to women and men know it. It’s oppressive.
Me: A whistle is oppression? That’s just crazy. It’s appreciation by men and women know it. And what about approaching women on the street, is that assault or something?
The Feminist: It gets close especially when the approach has any sexual content.
Me: Flash your gash.
The Feminist: What?
Me: I’ll make you grunt.
The Feminist: You disgust me.
[…] Are you curious what constitutes the daily life of a girl who thinks herself a feminist? An anonymous commenter caught a glimpse of the Day-to-Day Feminist’s paltry, predictable world. […]
Day to day feminist?
More like Day to Day Opportunist.
and Hypocrite.