From an American Sociological Review research paper, đSCIENTISTSđ (as opposed to feminist âââscientistsâââ) discover that egalitarian marriages â ones where in practice husbands shoulder a significant amount of the household chores traditionally the province of wives â are arid, sexless wastelands.
This article began by noting that American marriages are more egalitarian today than they were in the past, but scholars have found it difficult to offer a clear interpretation of how egalitarianism has changed the nature of marriage itself. One broad interpretation of egalitarianism is that couples exchange resources across various domains. Moves toward more equality in one area, such as earnings, might thus induce more equal distributions in other areas, like housework, a suggestion that has certainly received extensive investigation. In this article, we asked whether men and women use housework and sex as resources for exchange, or whether other logics govern sexual frequency within marriage.
Following up on the widely publicized claim that by doing more housework, husbands in more egalitarian marriages got more sex, we sought to investigate the links between menâs participation in housework and sexual frequency using nationally representative data. Our findings suggest the importance of gender display for sexual frequency in heterosexual marriage: couples where men participate more in core tasksâwork typically done by womenâreport lower sexual frequency. Similarly, couples where men participate more in non-core, traditionally masculine tasks report higher sexual frequency, suggesting the importance of gender-typed participation in household labor. Additionally, although our main results examined core and non-core labor separately, we note that regressions using the share of total housework (core and non-core combined) also show a negative and significant coefficient for menâs share of housework.
Game, set, match, Sheryl âLying Shrikeâ Sandberg. Doing more womenâs work in the home will NOT improve a husbandâs sex life, as you feminist creeps assert. It will result in the opposite: A gradual weakening of the sexual polarity until a unisexual listlessness consumes the relationship in a quellfire of anhedonia.
Any male feminist who at this point still claims that chipping in with the housework will make his wife happier and their sex life hotter is just fooling himself. Or rationalizing his abject supplication to an overbearing shrew. Housework doesnât lubricate vagina; acting a dominant man with dropped testes whoâd rather swing a splitter than scrub a toilet is what turns on women.
These resultsâwhether using both menâs and womenâs reports in a pooled analysis, relying on opposite spouses for reports of our key variables, or relying on menâs or womenâs results aloneâshow that households with a more gender-traditional division of labor report having more sex. The pattern of results suggests the existence of a gendered set of sexual scripts, in which the traditional performance and display of gender is important for creation of sexual desire and performance of sexual activity.
Sex-traditional division of labor is sexy because, stop the presses, masculinity in men is attractive to women and femininity in women is attractive to men.
Many confounding variables were accounted for in the paper, including overall marital happiness, religion, and sex ideology. None of them mediated the housework-sex frequency interaction. Men who did more girly chores got less nookie; men who did less girly work and more manly outdoors work got more nookie. Women who did more girly work got more nookie; women who did more manly work did no see a change in their sex frequency.
(The bottleneck variable appears to be the type of work that men do. As long as the husband is the whip-hand, the wife will desire him, regardless how much non-core housework she does.)
The lack of interactions or mediation lends support, we argue, to the notion that the operating mechanism is one that links within-couple displays of masculinity and femininity to sexual scripts leading to sexual frequency. [âŠ]
Men or women may, in essence, be turned on (however indirectly) when partners in a marriage do more gender-traditional work. Of course, men and women could also be turned off by doing work that is not traditional for their gender.
Feminists and their down-filled male lackeys trying to convince people that women âleaning inâ like men, and men âcleaning inâ like women, will heat up the bedroom are fighting a losing battle. Because no matter how much propaganda the Hivemind Hatemachine churns out, thereâs simply no substitute for the rude reality-based imperatives that harden dicks and slicken pussies.
At the very least, our results are difficult to reconcile with the idea that women trade sex to men for doing what is traditionally viewed as womenâs work. Based on our findings, sex seems to lie outside the realm of conventional exchange.
Why do feminists argue against common sense? Why are feminists anti-pleasure? Why do feminists loathe male prerogative? One answer has to do with the intrinsic character of feminists. Most feminists like Sheryl Sandberg are masculinized women, in body and/or in psyche. This deformity of nature arouses their bitterness and motivates their desire to upend normal society to not just acknowledge, but exalt, their peculiar disposition. A psychologically manly broad like Sandberg is nothing like the majority of women, but that leetle inconvenience doesnât stop her from trying to poison sex relations and rework society to assuage her low-E ego.
The importance of gender has declined over time, but it continues to exert a strong influence over individual behaviors, including sexual frequency within marriage.
Clarification: The importance of gender as a matter of legal redress has increased over time, but despite these immense social and legal pressures to obliterate any differences between the sexes the natural and evolved compulsions deriving from our gender continue to have the final say over individual behaviors, including sexual frequency within marriage.
***
Executive summary: As per usual, non-feminist science shits in feminist faces and slobbers kisses all over the Chateau Heartiste worldview. To preen, or not to preen⊠that is a silly question. *preen*
[âŠ] Marital Egalitarianism Is Bad For Your Sex Life [âŠ]
Reblogged this on Lunacy is contagious.
Study shows correlation, not cause and effect. Alpha male masculine men donât do bitch chores. And they get more pussy for the same reason, because theyâre masculine. Feminized men do housework and get less pussy due to the same causes.
Nothing is sexier to a woman than an alpha male who cooks something for them. They will blow you right there in the kitchen. Donât vacuum, dust, or clean shit, thatâs what women are for.
I know itâs hard to think of Feminists as anything more than man hating jackbooted thugs of the interwebs. But, I have always suspected the real reason for the venom towards men is Not to actually beat down men. Itâs to keep other less militant women in the fold of feminism.
I other words the real reason for man hating is to not acknowledge the positive benefits to traditional gender roles. Or as CH puts it:
âWomen who did more girly work got more nookie; women who did more manly work did no see a change in their sex frequency.â
They donât want to have âweak womenâ running off the reservation having satisfying sex⊠thus causing blowback to women who donât do gender role chores and force their beta-husbanks to do it.
the real reason for man hating is to brow-beat the little Shegetz boys into growing up to be effete panty-waist whining simpering eunuchs. Effeminate societies produce slaves [which is the traditional default in the greater Middle East, Africa, and most of the Far East], whereas masculine societies produce men who grow up to throw off their chains and hang their former slave masters from trees. âFeminismâ is just the psychological warfare of crowd control writ large.
Do you just write whatever the voices in your head happen to be babbling about, or is there actual premeditation?
Somehow, The Sunstein Within just canât connect Game to the bigger picture of Feminism, nor connect that to the biggest picture, the virtual enslavement of the West.
Yet the ability to make those connections is the very advantage our host enjoys over all other PUA sites, and it is why bloggers who can actually think, are attracted to this site.
There are plenty of âpureâ PUA sites, run by those whose sole purpose in life, like his, is to defile White women, but he prefers it here. Now why would that be?
@spirit of alinsky
Thatâs all you got for us? Snark? You think ZS is the weak link and you want to turn the crowd against him with shaming language?
You play politics like a girl, or a fag. Or a Jew.
@vagina desiccator
Calling the Middle East, Africa, and the Far East âeffeminate societiesâ is so hilariously wrong that we should assume either mental illness or premeditated trolling.
> âso hilariously wrongâ
As you well know, bisexuality and outright sodomy are the default mode of behavior for most of the servant castes in those parts of the world. Not to mention the herpes epidemic amongst your peeps: http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2015/02/21/orthodox-jews-de-blasio-administration-in-talks-over-circumcision-ritual-after-herpes-cases/
How TJWâs peeps game the system: http://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=355433
A number of years ago, Disney Parks instituted a policy that catered to handicapped (both mentally and physically) children and their families⊠In 2013, Disney discovered this policy was being badly abused in the most soul-crushing and miserable way possible: rich parents, mostly from New York City, were honest-to-God hiring disabled children to drag around the theme parks, all to skip attraction lines⊠The âblack-market Disney guidesâ run $130 an hour, or $1,040 for an eight-hour day. âMy daughter waited one minute to get on âItâs a Small Worldâ â the other kids had to wait 2 1/2 hours,â crowed one mom, who hired a disabled guide through Dream Tours Florida⊠âThis is how the 1 percent does DisneyââŠ
Captain Obvious/Zombie Shane waves hands furiously: âDonât mention English boarding schools and Oxford backrubs! Donât talk about prison bitches! None of that exists! Hetero-homosexuality only exists outside the West!â
Funny: On one hand yâall bitch about the swaggering alpha cocksuredness that black dudes exhibit here in the US. On the other hand, you say that Africa is an âeffeminateâ society. LOL. Contradict much?
[CH: african culture isnât effeminate, itâs matricentric. black men do tend to be more emotional than white or asian men, though.]
Fascism achieves unity through a negative aim. Feminazis must constantly screeeech for more war on men; there can never be peace. Thus their scaremongering false dichotomy: either (1) we must constantly escalate the war on men, or (2) all women will be shackled in the kitchen barefoot raped and pregnant within minutes.
As they said in Animal Farm, you must constantly work harder and do what we say or else Jones will come back, and you donât want Jones to come back, do you?
[âŠ] By CH [âŠ]
Julienâs never going to get laid again!! He had a twitter hate campaign against him!! Heâll have to change his name and hide, no girl would go NEAR someone accused of being a misogynistic rape-coach banned from multiple countries around the world for his rape tactics!!!
âŠO RLY?:
#GoogleMyName #YehItsKewl
A photo posted by @rsdjulien on
#GoogleMyName #YehItsKewl instagram.com/p/z_7dP0NjRY http://t.co/o6lj4Hb5OZâ Julien Blanc (@RSDJulien) March 09, 2015
lolâŠstill waiting for RSD to shut down, RVF. Between Julienâs upcoming world-tour event and Tylerâs latest news of âIâm planning to release 5 videos a week by mid 2015 and ideally get to 25 videos a week by 2016 / 2017.â and âIdeally Iâd get to 1 video a day from Monday to Friday (so 1 vid / week on each channel), and then in 2016 / 2017 Iâd love to get to 3 or 5 videos a week on each channel (around 15 â 25 vids). So each channel would have a new video posted every week day by that time.â it sounds like theyâre basically on the brink of shutting down for sure.
Guess this all seems kind of silly now: âRSD is paying a huge financial price for their mistakes. What hotel or conference center will host them now? What club will let them use a venue to teach? What type of customer wants to be associated with a company whose reputation is connected to assault? What skilled pickup instructor wants to work with them instead of their competitor? And what sex-starved young man wants to follow a company that teaches one brand of masculinity while responding to a gang of feminists in a decidedly unmasculine manner?â
I remember someone mentioning that the haters were running around like chickens with their head cut off ignoring critical rational thinking in favor of emotional feelz like Feminists/SJWs doâŠwho was that wise sage again? hmmâŠ
Let that whole shitshow be a lesson: if you donât engage, people move on and forget about their outrage when the next thing to be outraged by comes along a week later. Engage and youâll drag it out for months/years and waste time you could have spent working on something more productive.
Itâs not just a matter of division of labor in the household. It started outside the home, as the world shifted away from agriculture towards industry. It takes less testosterone to run machinery (esp. computers) than it does to grow crops or brand cattle. That economic reality explains most of the drift towards more equal sexes (hormonally and socially).
Itâs a two-way street. Women have become more dominant/masculine as an adjustment to men becoming more effeminate. The idea that doing less housework or growing a beard is going to make your nuts grow or her get horny is a silly fantasy. Itâs a start, but it takes quite a bit more work than that.
The guy-doing-housework phenom is more prevalent in urban areas, where both genders do more of the same types of paper-pushing jobs. Youâll still find that thr genders are more polarized in places where manual labor is the predominant source of income, i.e. rural communities.
> âurban areas, where both genders do more of the same types of paper-pushing jobsâ
Long term, the Total Fertility Rates for populations living those sorts of dreary post-human existences will quickly dwindle down to zero. Who has more time for child-bearing and child-rearing: The IQ-120 White chick with $250,000 in student loan debt, a 24Ă7 pager [== iPhag] on her hip, and a Cisco tunnel from her home computer into her Citrix server virtual desktop at work, who finds herself awake at 2AM every night, staring at Excel spreadsheets; or the IQ-120 Amish chick on the farm in Ohio, who has no electricity in her home, but plenty of electricity in bed with her farmer/lumberjack/carpenter husband?
Related: see my comment below once out of moderation. Good observations by both of you, SF! and Anon.
And CO, glad youâre still around to make these points about over-educated careerist grrrrls sans the BIO drumbeat. No homo.
I wonder if this is why guys try to work these nutty 80 hour a week finance and law jobs. Itâs like bringing home the bacon was no longer an act of masculinity and doing physical work wasnât a real option. So they shifted towards working insane hours, which women cannot and will not compete with. Then those guys amass more wealth than women can earn. Maybe that makes them feel like they are on top in the world more than women are. I wonder about this because I donât think investment banking and corporate law were routinely 80 hour a week jobs in the 1950s the way they are now.
@walawala , habd, sentient, yareally
So i nexted that girl since then who u guys were saying was trying to put me into ljbf/beta orbiter role. Now she is chasing hard. Proximity iois , strong eye contact etc. So can i re-initiate now? Since she has seen me engaging other girls and is feeling the heat of competition. My question is how much she has to do on her part for me to initiate again? Since being hardcore asshole mode all the time is gonna turn her off sooner rather than later plus there is added disadvantage of triggering her ASD if i keep making her trying re.initiation without any effort on my part since man has to lead. Thoughts?
> âSince being hardcore asshole mode all the time is gonna turn her off⊠added disadvantage of triggering her ASDâŠâ
Jesus H Christ you are thinking like a Beta. LOSE THE DEFEATIST ATTITUDE. You are the prize, not she. Have you sexualized the conversation yet? Sexualization needs to start within the first few sentences of meeting her. If sheâs showing renewed interest, then demand naked pics from her to prove her sincerity. âPics of your titties or STFU.â
@Walky TalkyâŠ. Youâre over-thinking this. If sheâs chasing hard find a way to make it natural that you re-open her. Donâ t over-game her.
Just find a way to tease her: âYou again?â Then float the idea of a meet upâŠIâll be in the east end Friday, letâs go for drinksâŠ
IF she blows you off, you have your answer.
Two situationsâŠa 26 year old I was gaming was always coming over, cooking but wouldnât kiss me. I just disappeared, stopped calling, stopped talking to herâŠshe saw me at a partyâŠI ignored herâŠ.if she re-engages iâll know itâs on.
SecondâŠmy crazy ex gfâŠsuddenly starts re-engaging me over the past 6 weeksâasking me to danceâŠteasing meâŠ
The other night she invited me to danceâŠ.I looked at her right in the eye and said: âI fucked you to this songâŠâ She didnât bat an eye.
The next night she came by again started teasing meâŠI looked at her and said : âIFâŠwe go for drinksâŠIFâŠyouâre buying the first roundâŠâ
Left it at thatâŠWhy? Because I donât care about either of these two. If they step up fine..if they donât Iâve got better girls in my rotation.
One wants to come over and clean my apartmentâŠand bang me. Buys me giftsâŠ
You should have more girls in your rotation so that issues like this are more learning points than things that really matter.
The 27 year old who told me to âfuck offâ after imagining me banging some bakerâŠI donât think about re-opening her because itâs her job to find a way to re-engage meâŠ
Donât make it too easy but if a girl makes the effort and youâre ok with thatâŠthen take the leadâŠ
What walawala said.
Basically (try to) isolate and escalate w/comfort. Youâll have your answer.
@Walky Talky one more pointâŠif you re-engageâŠit has to come from a place where sheâs doing most of the talkingâŠand youâre basically just listeningâŠThen just change the subjectâŠand suggest a meet upâŠ
It needs to be casualâŠsomething you were going to do or wanted to doâŠâThereâs that art show TuesdayâŠyou seem like the cultured type, letâs goâŠâ that kind of thing.
IF sheâs chasing you then keep your frameâŠdonât be too eager.
If a woman is married and has been through a divorce, she is more likely to hint about meetups rather than say anything overt, especially on social media and when texting on cellphones. She might like a particular event or accept invitations to events where you are likely to see it. Or she might mention casually that she went to an event without her husband. Lawyers in divorce proceedings will usually subpoena social media to find anything that makes the opposition look bad in court.
I think that this plays somewhat into something YaReally was saying about how girls will move around so that they are in a manâs field of vision. Iâve noticed several instances of this recently. Generally not in my field of visionâmore in my proximity. A few wanted to chat and one wanted to dance. I can remember another who wanted to dance and often asks me, but she wanted to be asked. She was in my FOV.
Iâm curious how many other men would rule out a woman who smokes. Howsaboutit?
god damn all this advice is spergy. Re-what? Jfc, just ask her for a drink. If she says no, next her.
iow, make me a sammich ftw.
Ms. Sandberg is one of the main heads of Narcissism Inc., so itâs no surprise that she lacks the insight and the humility in both her position and her personality. Of course, introspection requires deeper thoughts than âmy housework for my clit!â It takes wisdom to realize that youâre doing a disservice to the majority by selling your abnormal lifestyle as the main way and your point of view as right.
There is one way, however, for Mr. Sandberg to get more sex: Hire a maid, while wifey is knee-deep playing the role of go-getter executive.
> âIt takes wisdom to realize that youâre doing a disservice to the majorityâ
Unless you are actively intentionally consciously purposefully TRYING to do a disservice to the majority. Then it all makes sense.
This.
Re: âpreen,â what sucks is that Sandberg has 7,000 times as many readers (this is not an attack on CHâit sucks), and women still are the gatekeepers of all sex, LTRs, marriages, and whether we get to have children with good genes, in this messed up anti-society.
I have about given up on linking CH to people who need to read it. There is zero chance any female will even avoid going ape shit ballistic upon reading an article such as this one. Even though CHâs words are 100% correct, these women, especially the under 35 crowd, are so far brainwashed into what someone around here used to call âFrankfurt Schoolâ that it blows their mind to even see a person suggest these things. They will literally stamp their feet, run away, and turn you into to HR if they are a co-âworkerâ.
As far as blue pill men, male buddies, there is about a 1% chance that they will at least read the article before dismissing it.
Sad state of affairs. We who read here and at Rational Male and other good sources of realtalk facts and anti-hivemind information are in a very, very small minority of people.
And you can be damn sure that this is what Sandberg and most of the rest of the HochJuden are doing.
Why on earth would he WANT to fuck that yenta bagel bust in bitch?
And here is another reason why marriage is such a no-win proposition for men.
If you adhere to traditional gender based divisions of labor within the household, then you are a selfish asshole who wonât help out around the house.
Your wifeâs covenâŠ.I mean friendsâŠwill make sure she knows how badly she is being treated and how unconscionably she is being devalued and taken for granted. A couple of her divorced friends may even suggest divorce as a way out of her cauldron of victimization. Someone always knows the best lawyer who is most adept at extracting the maximum dollars from the arrogant, sexist selfish prick husband.
OrâŠ..you can share household duties equitably. Isnât tonight your night to empty the dishwasher? Why donât you help me fold the laundry while we watch The Voice? Tell you whatâŠ.Iâll help our kids with their homework and why donât you go vacuum downstairs. Donât forget the guest room. Remember my mom is coming in tomorrow afternoon.
If you live in suburbia, where once the lawn is mowed the rest of the chores are inside, itâs even worse. And if you have kids? Are you really going to refuse to warm a bottle of formula, or change a diaper, or mop up some spit-up off the coffee table? What kind of Neanderthal are you?
Just remember that even as your wife thanks you for all your help around the house (âThe guest room looks great, honey! Thanks!) she is growing inexorably more repulsed by you, until sex with you becomes about as appealing as sex with her little brother.
And THATâS when she texts her friend for the name of that lawyerâŠâŠ.
what about the guys who married American women who have little to no desire, interest, or ability to clean or keep a place tidy? Are we suppose to live in filth? Itâs my day off and Iâm doing laundry and running dishes as we speak. FML.
Red pill really woke me up, and being direct and âmeanâ with women was insane in how I was suddenly racking up girls far more than being nice.
This is true, but it doesnât even have to be âmean.â Being mean implies you care enough to give some thought to what would hurt or anger her. Why make even that investment?
Every time I treated a woman as an adult human being, I was disappointed.
Every time I treated a woman with indifference or as a spoiled child in need of a firm hand, I was rewarded.
To this day, the real me [== Mr Nice Guy] still feels bad about being accidentally rude to chicks, but itâs amazing how they keep coming back for more.
âEvery time I treated a woman with indifference or as a spoiled child in need of a firm hand, I was rewarded.â
This.
Iâve gotten every girl in my life by being defiant, being the unmovable object is what men must be.
This all could be a case of âchicken or the eggâ or âwho; whomâ. A blogger I used to read spoke of this division where the beta is doing all these household chores yet still getting a ration of shit from his wife; âwhile the alpha hasnât taken the trash out in 5 yearsâ.
I think this is a case of observation after the fact. The genuine desire of the woman has slipped (if she ever had it in the first place). Her screeching is often cyclical (ovulation). She purrs and rubs against her alpha. She gets out the whip to crack on the beta scum for her she lacks attraction. And instead of recognizing the reality of the loss or lack of genuine desire, the poor beta tries to compensate in manners that further increase his wretchedness.
Itâs not so much the âchopping woodâ that causes the increase in sexual frequency, itâs the âChopping Woodâ. The man with a woman that has genuine desire for him fucks him regardless. Yes, the masculine chores have some effect on maintaining the attraction as opposed to him donning an apron and scrubbing the floors. But when there is significant sexual attraction that is a function of his masculinity, then he really doesnât need to do shit. No chores. No job. No nothing.
The key is watching her calendar, gauging her behavior, and if necessary, using a big fucking shovelful of dread if ole girl wants to get all uppity. Fuck a bunch of chores. If the dread donât work; then you are too far gone and it is then best to ease on down the road. You can go read Athol Kay and make you a MAP. But to me, that is groveling by different means. Best to use Google Maps.
So I watched the video and neither of those women was ugly given their ages. I was expecting a lecture on the benefits of gender equality in the work place from Shrek. I did notice Ms. Sandberg is the COO of Facebook. What is about all those Silicon Valley companies that they intertwine themselves with stupid social justice causes and force it down everyoneâs throat. I am so sick and tired of that kind of arrogance. Just look at their CEO, the man wears a hoodie to corporate meetings because a suit isnât fashionable enough apparently.
Zuckerbergâs balls cut short,
Sandbergâs tits so long,
Oh what, oh what could it be?
âWhat is about all those Silicon Valley companies that they intertwine themselves with stupid social justice causes and force it down everyoneâs throat.â
Jews following their Darwinian scriptâŠ.destroying the host organism.
Sheryl Sandberg is a nothing who got where she is exclusively because she is a Jewish woman. http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2014/08/facebooks-sheryl-sandberg-and-jewish-networking/
Donâcha know?
Itâs because THEYâRE smarter and the rest of us are JUST JEALOUS.
llzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlzolzolzozlozlozlozl
A question for the anti-semites here: Why havenât you been critical of east Asians for doing the same things Jewish people allegedly do?
Not playing into your âantisemitesâ frame⊠not a chinamanâs chance.
But for the record, when the Orientals actually DO the same things that the current men-behind-the-curtain are doing, weâll be glad to hate them for it too.
This
There isnât enough space to write about it here. They are a sickening bunch. I did some quick research and found in the US they voted in Obama in greater % than Jews in 2012. They make up 15-25% of population at your Ivy League and damn near half at your California schools. They are suing the Ivy League for greater admissions percentage too. They arenât your friends, they are just thieves essentially. Even their names, they take our names. It wonât surprise me to hear that George Edward Zhang is class president at Harvard or some such university soon.
Martin, you idiot. Asians are not the executive producer of every single thing that a woman sees on a screen. Everything on TV, Disney, google, twitter, in school. Women for 30 years and especially the last 15 receive a very aggressive message to hate white men and not want marriage or children before age 35. Asians are not the ones who controlled the giving of that message.
Fucking duh, dude.
Youâre on the right track, Martin. Now imagine an even sneakier race, with 3,000 years of practice at imitating European and West Asian peoples on the outside, while maintaining complete hatred and xenophobia on the inside. Imagine they have far less of the slave mentality bred by 6,000 years of intense rice farming. Imagine they have seen all the variations, learned the thousand tricks of elite replacement, the false conversions, the selective intermarriages, the tax farming, the war agitation and funding, ad infinitum. Imagine they are far less visible than the Asians that are leading you to truth. Imagine it is they who laid the groundwork for the Asians at Berkeley and Harvard many decades ago, and they who will do their best to ensure the Asians rise no higher than first among servants.
You asked the question âhow come these high-tech companiesâŠ.?â
Youâre almost there.
I guess it depends what you think of as âfeminine houseworkâ.
Letâs say youâre a bachelor and donât have a slave waifu to clean up after you. As far as I can see, youâre a huge pussy if your house is anything other than spotless. Being clean is a huge signal that you are a master of your environment and have surplus resources.
Only poor fucks leave dirty dishes in the sink.
Anyway, Iâm in a committed relationship and I still wipe my own asshole. Guess Iâm castrating myself and she would rather be with some jerkboy pussy who has a shit-stained toilet.
strawman yawn
oink
The main reason men are cleaner and keep more organized households is because we donât collect a bunch of crap and nick-nacksâŠ
Women collect junk (like that flower shaped soap in the bathroom you ainât supposed to use). Trying to clean around their junk and clutter is what makes their housework so laborious.
[CH: true dis]
Housework/homemaking is probably pretty easy until a couple has kids. Thatâs when the division of labor really starts to matter.
There is no âdivision of laborâ, however, when the man earns between 80% to 100% of the income from outside work. Itâs usually at least 70% even when the wife is a lawyer; she will have the âfunâ government job with easier hours while heâs the junior partner at Biglaw working 70 hour weeks to make the money. But not one mainstream media publication has even once published an article suggesting that the wife should go to the husbandâs office and do half of his work there. Even today with all of the affirmative favoritism of women in higher education and jobs, it is EXCEEDINGLY rare that the woman will earn anything close to the same income as her husband. Even the SWPL power couples follow the scriptâhusband works the corporate slave job and brings in $180,000 or $220,000 or whatever, and wifey-lawyer works a fun job in government or for a nonprofit and brings in $40,000 or $70,000.
But women get a constant message from MSM that in these situations, the man should still do 50% of the housework even if he literally works out of the house an average of 3 hours more each day.
Notice I did not exaggerate. Three hours. Three little hours. But that is a lot. That is a ton of time. Thatâs getting home at 8:30 instead of 5:30. Thatâs his time to go to the gym or unwind.
After kids, most European-American men (who are betas or they would not be married) have an extreme love for their kids and only want to be with them. Then he must choose between taking a non-partner type track at work, for more time with kids, in exchange for less money (and wife lacking any ability to understand, and thus losing attraction for him as he becomes less alpha), or continuing to work the workaholic path, see kids less, make more money (while wifey bitches to all of her friends from her luxury home that he pays for how her husband is a workaholic, with wifey lacking even the slightest ability to put basic 2 and 2 together and see that the husbandâs work is what pays for their life).
And yet not one MSM magazine or newspaper will publish any article crying about how âMen still canât have it all.â
Nobody can have it all, if you have kids. Only women are told (and are selfish enough to believe) that they should expect to.
Meanwhile, in the world of unmarried, childless humans, women daily brag on the internet about how they use dating sites to get free dinners from betas who have no chance with them, while claiming to be âfeministsâ and not coming close to understanding the irony.
If youâre a bachelor, youâre not married â this article is about marriages.
Reading is fundamental.
I think every girlfriend I have ever had cleaned my apartment with some regularity (this was in the early 00âs). I did my own dishes cause who needs that mess.
I even had one girl I wasnât even dating come over during finals and clean it for me because she âknew I would be too busy to do it myselfâ. I was thick enough at the time to not realize I should have slept with her.
Girl who:
Cleans for you: DTF
Does laundry of any sort (especially your sheets): DTF
Brings you food of any kind: DTF
Gives you an item of clothing: DTF
And re: cleaning your own kitchen â I view my kitchen as a workshop. I always leave my kitchen in a ready-to-work state, and I expect the same from the girls I bang.
For readers just joining us at the Chateau: the cooking thing, weâve been over this several times here, but the executive summary is Cooking Is Alpha Behavior, when approached correctly. Itâs all about the context and your calibration.
What a fucking mess, literally. Married or not, I see a lot of, simply put, gross women out there. Avoiding âhouseholdâ chores, etc, has also, in my observation, led to lower personal hygiene. Its an excuseâŠa simple fucking excuse to be lazy and, for these âempoweredâ middle class women, the double or triple whammy is most pronounced. They have feminism saying that kind of work is beneath you i.e. youâre better than that and entitled not to do that, plus, many of these princesses come from mothers who very much did care for the houseâŠahem and them (theyâre children) et al. This combination creatures a truly wretched creature, because, you get an ideological brainwashing working on top of an already spoiled brat who never cleaned anything in the first place. Then they went to college and became even greater slobs. women today are grossâŠits unbelievable from just a short time ago, a female would be aghast if she stunk a little, was a bit dis-shoveled in appearance or her home was gross. Frankly, I say, let them get grosserâŠsooner or late there ass stink and body odor will wake them up and lots of tears will fallâŠlet em.
[CH: troll, but i give it points for enthusiasm.]
[âŠ] Source: Heartiste [âŠ]
âWomen who did more girly work got more nookie; women who did more manly work did no see a change in their sex frequency.â
Iâm surprised the âmanlyâ work women didnât experience a nookie drop. Isnât the conventional red pill wisdom that working women are grouchy and tired and often say no to sex? Unless they meant there was no change in how often the manly womenâs husbands/partners wanted to have sex with them.
âWhy do feminists argue against common sense? Why are feminists anti-pleasure? Why do feminists loathe male prerogative? One answer has to do with the intrinsic character of feminists. Most feminists like Sheryl Sandberg are masculinized women, in body and/or in psyche.â
Not sure⊠I think this is one area where itâs less genetic and more cultural. American girls are raised to believe weâre as smart as men (if not smarter) and can and should accomplish everything⊠that we can excel at both the masculine and the feminine jobs. It sounds awesome, but of course thereâs absolutely no way to do that in real life, unless your husband is chipping in at least 50% on the âfeminineâ domestic side. So for high achieving career women like Sandberg, if you want to keep believing the feminist dogma you grew up with, you HAVE to reject traditional gender roles and claim men and women are exactly the same, and can happily do exactly the same work. Otherwise, the whole idea collapses.
I think deep down these women know thereâs something unnatural and sexually unhealthy about these androgynous marital roles. But at this point theyâve backed themselves into a corner. So they keep pushing the bliss of total equality, as much to convince themselves as anyone else.
I wonder how you think this applies to cooking?
Personally I quite enjoy cooking as a pastime and creative outlet. In the past I have used this as a date option and I find that it allows me to set up a great dynamic by being master of the kitchen.
I manage my date by directing her in cutting, chopping, and other prep work, and allow my date to to try her hand at the main task for a short period, after which I allow her to complete the cooking work, if she performs sufficiently well. The entire time I will usually be doing something else, while occasionally checking on her work and offering constructive criticism on her technique / execution of the task.
Basically, I imagine this falls under the category of âitâs alpha if you do it like an alphaâ?
Plus, youâre ensuring youâre actually eating something tasty â most women, especially younger women, have no idea how to cook
Cosigned. Dinner at my place is default second date. Always leads to lay.
Lots of chances to demonstrate dominance and test for submission. You can give her a couple of BS choices to make her feel like sheâs *somewhat* in charge (onions or shallots?) but really donât mean much. Sometimes Iâll even ask girls to chop garlic so that my fingers donât smell, then when theyâre done take the chopped garlic and throw it in the blender with all the other stuff. Hamster: ignited.
Kitchen bitch.
Phil, I wouldnât even let you take the trash out. Thatâs a manâs job.
I learned to iron properly in the Military, no one else but me can do it right, I donât enjoy it but I get satisfaction knowing my shirt is pressed correctly.
College Bro is doing it right.
The feminist that complain about this sort of thing live in condos where the association takes care of every masculine chore except changing the air filter on the furnace or the occasional lightbulb.
I rarely see this complaint from women in the burbs cause they wouldnât trade chores with their husband for anything. My wife doesnât even want me doing some of it. Like cleaning the gutters. She feels we should just pay some Mexican $100 to do 40 minutes of work because in her mind it is apparently too great a risk for me to get up on a ladder.
Co-signed. See my comment below once out of moderation.
Got dumped over the weekend. Going through old CH posts to make me feel better. Thereâs some good stuff. Thanks.*
*Even if they may or may not have been written by a previous proprietor.
if you are a keen reader of the site surely you seen it coming no? the signs are always there
the signs are always there
Yeah. I was tempted to walk out last weekend but figured I was just in a lousy mood because of work stress. Should have trusted my gut.
The first clue may be in your attitude. An alpha wouldâve chosen âeverybodylovesscottâ as a handle.
I chose this handle years ago and it humors me. Iâm still no alpha but Iâm getting better despite the current set back.
Keep it up
The next bus is arriving in 15 minutes.
who gives a fuck? It could seriously be a LOT worse, man.
Congrats!, you refused to do any of the âfeminineâ chores, so now you get to do the more difficult âmasculineâ chores. Oh, and you saved your marriage, so you can keep fucking one and only one woman over and over again, because thatâs what men want to do.
Field Report â Sat
Went to the beach with 2 of my boys. As we were walking we saw 2 girls (HB8 blonde and HB7 latina) and the blonde gave my bro a nice smile. My bro opened with âHiâ (simple and works), she said âhiâ. I asked where they were headed, to stop them from walking on. They said a bar; I said, âwhy donât you put that off for a minute and chill with us.â They were from out of town, stuck on a layover on their way to south America. Perfect lol. At that exact moment, my other bro was getting picked up to go to a hockey game and we had a natural time constraint. I tossed the blonde my phone and told her to give me her number, we will meet up with them in a few minutes. She did as told and we partedâŠ
âŠ45 minutes later, I texted her. A game of missed calls/missed texts occurred as my remaining bro and I walked and stopped at bars. While I was pissing at random bar, blondie texted me to come meet them â but when I went to get my bro he had already opened a new 2-set (lol another HB8 blonde and a 6.5 latina, dĂ©jĂ vu). He told me later they had been ordering drinks near him and he opened with an indignant but playful, ââŠso whereâs my shot?â which got the ball rolling. When I returned I introduced myself and instantly stole the sunglasses off of blonde#2 head and put them on.
Both broads complimented me on the way the glasses looked, so I knew it was gonna go well. Started kinoing, touching a tattoo on Latina girl and then lifting up the back of blonde#2 shirt to âcheckâ if she had tattoo in same spot. They started return-firing kino at me and my boy. Blonde2 told me, âI donât like latin guysâ I replied, âgood I donât like white girls.â The gleam in her eye told of moisture forming down below lol. Lots of laser eyes. I let her catch me staring at her tits. Shortly after found out Latina one was married (but no ring on tonight cuz she likes attention, imagine that lol) and blondie2 had a boyfriend. Found this out after I tried getting blonde2âs number and got blown out. Once me and my bro realized it was getting late and these chicks would take some work, we decided to shake and head home. The girls were definitely surprised.
As we walked away to go home, I send a final text the blonde#1, âlike ships in the night, maybe in another life, later.â Imagine my surprise when she called me 20 seconds later. I told her to be where we met in 1 minute or we are gone. They were lol. We went to a new bar. I took off the silly hat blonde1 had been wearing all day and put in on me, where it stayed for the rest of the night. I started pawing at her playfully, which she returned. A random girl walked by next to me, intending to give someone she knew a girlscout cookie; I stole it out of her hand and ate it. The girl I stole it from smiled, laughed and gave me a dap. The girls we were with lost their shit, laughing.
Blonde2 and Latina2 from the last bar suddenly appeared and placed themselves in proximity to us (now I wonder if they went there to find us lol). So I said hi to them but didnât invite them to join us. This of course demonstrated to Blonde1 and Latina1 that we had other options. I went in for the kiss on the blonde1 but she turned to the side. I was buzzed so I said fuck it and gently planted a single kiss on the tattoo behind her ear. She said that was the first time someone has ever kissed her without her permission lol. My boy was off with latina1 making out somewhere isolated. She qualified herself by bragging/putting down the texts she was getting constantly from other men she had met that day that were trying to meet up with her. We flirted a bit more, kino, got her to give me a kiss on the cheek for a selfie.
Then me and boy said we had to split (tired from being at the beach all day and his gf was blowing up both our phones but we never answer). They were shocked. A moment later, blonde1 asked if they could have a ride back to their hotel; I said sure but we should hit the hot tub to make it worth the drive. They said they werenât sure if their hotel had one but they were game.
Once we were in their hotel room, I told blonde1, âhey this is a nice hotel, why donât you show me the hallwaysâŠâ with an evil smirk. This was to give my boy a chance to get down with his chick and see if mine had warmed up a bit more. She said, ââŠyeah, sureâŠâ Once we were outside in the hallway we were making out. I led her to the ice machine room. I put her against the wall and was making out, feeling her up, did that thing where I went from above lifted her bikini top and was playing with her nips. She was going nuts, âI never sleep with guys the first time I meet emâŠâ, basically ASD kicked in hard. Suddenly I could hear my bro bellowing my name in the hallway. He was ready to leave ASAP (latina1 didnât want to fuck, just wanted to fool around and my bro wanted to split cuz he knew his wifey was pissed). Kissed blonde1 goodbye. She remembered my phone was back in her room so a few more kisses and we were gone. She wants to meet up next time shes in LAâŠ
Heartiste, take a look at this: different country, same shit.
To paraphrase Seth Rogen in 50/50:
Exhibit WHORE:
http://www.xojane.com/relationships/paying-dinner-online-dating
fundamental truths bear repeating â be the one who is chased not the one who chases
I concur
Such whores need to be taken out to a fancy dinner and just after dessert, you excuse yourself to go to the toilet or to take a call and then vanish, leaving her to pay the bill.
Then just make up a bullshit excuse on how you had an emergency to attend to or that the Whore Meter Application on your Phone flashed red and hit 11 on the scale.
Her narrowed, distrustful eyes and mini-smirk speak volumes.
âIâm a staunch feministâŠI think the guy should pay for the first meal as a demonstration of how he wants to treat you.â
Iâll pay for it if itâs fugu prepared by an AA hire.
I like how she mentions equality in the same breath as he pays â and how she never does mention what she brings to the table
âI like how she mentions equality in the same breath as he pays â and how she never does mention what she brings to the tableâ
Thatâs why I usually wonât do dinner or any kind of expensive entertainment on a first date. I just invite them to do shit Iâd do anywayâlike buy drum sticks and get a cup of coffee. It saves me money and they respect me for not trying to buy their favor.
BOOYAH. đđ
Iâm with you on this one!
Awesome, on point article: http://www.radixjournal.com/journal/2015/3/9/endgame.
But depressing. I fear it is too far gone. Crazy YKW leftists in firm control now, and the government does not fight with muskets anymore.
I would love it if CH could give me a reason to hope things will be better in 20 years, when my children should be getting married to start families. I fear that marriage will not exist at all in 20 years, thanks to the purposeful YKW effort to destroy normal civilization since 1970. What weâve seen the last 10 and even 5 years is simply flabbergasting. The libtard control is literally increasing exponentially.
CH,
I put this here simply to bring it to your attention. If it does not belong then do not publish or delete as the case may be.
I do suggest reading anything written by this man especially his âHomeless Jackâ series.
Seeker.
http://www.westernspring.co.uk/the-mental-disorder-of-white-self-hatred
And the asshole got the skank-cake. Whoâd have thunk?
Off topic:
I have a Craigslist post up, it gets a few hits every now and then â passive game at work â I write in a way that attracts the educated girls who are bored and horny and ânever do this sort of thingâ. I screen HARD and am usually not disappointed when I show up for the coffee meet-up. A little comfort joking about which one of us is the closet psycho, compliance testing, sexualize the convo quickly, usually in the context of what her husband/boyfriend ISNâT doing, and then bringing her back to my house for the lay.
Today, same thing. Coffee, comfort, kino, back to the house. After I blew my load all over her 34Cs, I was hit with a huge wave of disgust. For myself, for these girls who so easily fuck other men while pretending to be in an exclusive relationship.
Iâm 40 now, and have been divorced for 2 years. In the beginning, I was amazed at how easy it was to have sex with a girl just by throwing out that âalpha vibeâ. The first was my 23yo house cleaner who couldnât get to my dick fast enough once she found out my wife and I had separatedâŠ
Iâve doubled my lifetime notch count in 10 months and I am pretty particular about the type of girl I get with. I guess itâs time to try to build a crew of men to spend time with, but itâs tough. Most men my age are single AFCs or married schlubs. Hard to find like-minded men.
I suppose itâs the bitter aftertaste of the truth. In the end, we donât make the rules â we can exploit them, though; and mercilessly.
Wow. Megyn Kelly is a solid 9 but next to Shalom Scumberg, she is a hard 10. She looks like a gorgeous nubile next to an old hag. For the record: they are one year apart at 45 and 46. The wall certainly does not arrive evenly.
What a delight to see science confirming the obvious time and time again.
âYou may drive out nature with a pitchfork, yet sheâll be constantly running backâ
Horace. (Or was it Juvenal?)
Some practical Red Pill advice here.
http://www.returnofkings.com/58136/how-to-get-women-to-pay-for-stuff-and-buy-you-presents
http://www.fredoneverything.net/Coders.shtml
âAt something called the Harvard Gazette, apparently a literary asylum for ed-majors, sociologists, and the mildly brain-damaged, the female inmates are riled because there are not enough girls in computer science. Yes, discrimination. Their eyes agleam with the dull light of incomprehension, they moo, âWhen you make computer science about creative problem-solving, when you make it social, when itâs not scary and intimidating, and when you show people who look like real human beings rather than people whoâve been stuck in a basement âŠmore girls will be attracted to it.â
Oh god, oh god, oh god. Weâre going backwards. I told you Darwin was wrong.â
â⊠and when you show people who look like real human beings rather than people whoâve been stuck in a basement âŠmore girls will be attracted to it.â
Enter your local gay-assed stockphotographer.
Reblogged this on Just another complex system.
CH,
Can I make a request that you cut the word gender from future posts?
Gender is for learning languages.
Sex is for people.
[CH: i already try to avoid using that noxious feminist term âgenderâ. but itâs hard to eliminate it completely when every esteemed published paper uses it ad nauseam and you have to quote their findings.]
Re: Heartisteâs comment about swinging a splitter vs. cleaning a shitter â
An interesting implication of the correlations described in this study is the impact of opportunities for men to engage in masculine displays. I have observed that in crowded cities like L.A. and NYC (to name just two of many), where land is scarce, where rent is high, and where a good proportion of married couples with or without kids live cheek-to-jowl in high-density neighborhoods of apartment buildings, the daily living situation for men does not lend itself to running the man script.
If youâre living in a city, youâre very likely not hunting game animals for food or sport. If youâre living in an apartment, youâre likely not using power tools for repairs and maintenance, because the building management takes care of that for you (if you let them). Also if living in an apartment, good luck doing any serious woodworking or automotive work (yes, it can be done, but itâs a pain in the ass â personal experience here). If you have no lawn to mow, no garden to plow (heh), no lumber to split, no horses to shoe, no deer to dress, your opportunities for showing your masculine side are constrained.
In this sense, cities, and especially apartment buildings, are de-masculinizing, while country living is masculinizing. I have experienced both. I have often wondered, given this distribution of MDO (masculine display opportunity) along the city-country spectrum, whether a reproductive regulatory mechanism arises as a result. I.e., country-living men get more sex, have more children as a result. Here where I find myself these days, any such reproductive regulatory effect is overwhelmed by the competing forces of over-education and religion: Less-religious (as a whole), mostly White Masterâs Degrees holders have 0-2 kids, while more religious, mostly-Hispanic high school/G.E.D. types have 4-5 kids. But Iâd bet that if you control for race and religiosity, youâd see greater fecundity in areas of the country where a man has room to swing a splitter. As those areas tend to be more red-state leaning, that may give some hope to those of us whoâd like to see the constituency of the Hivemind wither and die off over time.
What does this mean for the sex-desiring man who finds himself living in a crowded apartment building? Obviously learning how to spit some Game will help, but Iâd suggest buttressing your cool stories and Cube routines with some Man Stuff. BE SEEN doing the following: Drive a truck with an in-bed toolbox. Volunteer with Habitat for Humanity and use a circular saw and hammer. Get a motorcycle and learn to take apart and rebuild the engine, then do this on the front sidewalk of your apartment building. Or park your truck on the street and do maintenance work on it at the hour when the career girls are getting home from their HR jobs (or near a coffee shop or popular brunch spot on weekends). Buy a rifle, learn how strip it down and clean it (be seen doing this your wife or girlfriend â> hotter sex, more often) (hat tip to ⊠maybe SouthernMan ? Read that particular tip here at CH several years ago). Learn how to quarter a whole chicken and barbecue it; makes a great cheap date at your place or hers. If she doesnât faint at the sight of you ripping the backbone out of a chicken, TINGLES.
Some of this is a regurgitation of olâ Zombie Shaneâs âget thee to a Red stateâ talking points, but inverted â I say bring the Red state to where *you* are. It works for me; it can work for you to, especially if youâre surrounded by manboob libtards and fake tatooed Bros who donât know a spark plug from a butt plug.
I question if women can love in the sense that men can and believe most are slaves to insecurities. If you want to have good relationships acknowledge this.
check therationalmale.com on womenâs opportunistic love and all the other stuff thatâs there
Semaj Ednolb has been assassinated.
Poor thwackie. đ
is that you kcawht?
http://www.bodylanguagesuccess.com/2015/03/nonverbal-communication-analysis-no_2.html
âNote Netanyahuâs body position relative to Obama. Although we cannot see his feet in this photo, from the position of his legs we can say with a high degree of confidence that his feet are pointed towards the camera and NOT to Obama. However the U.S. Presidentâs body is shifted considerably towards his counterpart and at least his left foot is pointed in the Israeli leaderâs direction.
Human beings point their bodies â the torso, lower abdomen, hips, knees â and particularly our feet towards those to whom weâre attracted (not applicable here of course) or in the direction of those whom we respect. Mr. Netanyahuâs body language is markedly disparate from his words. When the nonverbal and the verbal languages are in disagreement â itâs the nonverbal which always tells the truths.â
Muh conspiracy.
[âŠ] Marital Egalitarianism Is Bad For Your Sex Life | Chateau Heartiste [âŠ]
Of course, in Ms. Sandberg house, I suspect that womenâs work is done by women; just not by Ms. Sandberg. No reason to suspect that having servants do a womanâs chores would hurt her attraction to a man.
Please do a post on that tool who made a video proposing to his girlfriend for a whole year. âI think about you all the time, 24/7âł
Women are flocking to the comments section and demanding more men be like this. It makes me want to throw up on my shoes.
The road to âegalitarianâ relations begin hereâŠexhibit WHORE:
http://www.xojane.com/relationships/paying-dinner-online-dating
Maybe not the best example, but nice guys still finishing lastâŠ
http://imgur.com/lC7TXIP
If you âswing a splitterâ youâre using it wrong. Perhaps you mean to say, âswing an axe,â which is how I split logs.
Ouch! and well spotted. How about an eight-pound maul?
I use a sharp wedge (or 2) and a sledgehammer for green oak. I switch the the backside of the axe head to drive a wedge if the log wonât split. All learned from pop and trial-and-error.
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/bachelor-nation-70-men-aged-20-34-are-not-married
âdat comment sectionâŠ
Soon the smart young girls will figure out they need to bring shit to the table to make marriage appealingâŠtheyâll stop listening to women who look like the author of that article and the author of the study referenced in the article (google them for a laugh) and start adapting.
Feminism will adapt to the trends as the old feminist writers get pushed out of the feminist blogosphere and into irrelevancy because no one cares what bitter ugly old harpies think, and weâll start seeing articles about how the new empowerment is being marriage-worthy and landing a man early.
And the YaReally Reversion Theory will have begunâŠ<25yo girls will start looking for husbands before their career, and will eat healthy, exercise, know their value is in their looks, cook, clean, and there will be a voluntary return to traditional gender roles.
If you’re in your 20s or 30s, don’t settle down till your 40s. Better options are on the way, and they’ll be looking for established badass older men who can fulfill that masculine role in an LTR the way their feminized wishy washy terrified of their sexuality scared to touch a girl college peers can’t.
That comment section is unreal. Proud of all aspects of our movementsâŠMRAs, Manosphere, Red Pillers, MGTOWs, PUAsâŠthat comment section exists because of our combined efforts. Keep it up, gentlemen.
Approve my comment CH plz, linking a glorious link everyone should check out lol
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2015/03/10/fallout-oklahoma-racist-video/24691017/
White men discriminated against with affirmative action for 40 years to get into school and then jobs. Then we overcome that and make money anyway only to pay 33% taxes to feed blacks with EBT. While our white women have been taught not to give us kids.
But a white says one thingâlife ruined.
When does the revolution start? The country and institutions we created have been stolen from us by evil people.
When I see things like that I am surprised the revolution has not started yet.
What we have now is a tyranny against white males.
i love how rich feminists like sheryl sandberg, patricia arquette & emma watson are the ones pretending that they do housework, get paid less & have a hard life.
this advice is just a way to get men to put themselves in the friendzone, in their own marriage, so that their wives will divorce them.
I love your postings, CH. They have helped me on a lot of things and I couldnât be more grateful.
Hey I tried posting this before, dunno if word press ate it or if its still in moderation:
Went to the beach saturday with 2 of my boys. As we were walking we saw 2 girls (HB8 blonde and HB7 latina) and the blonde gave my bro a nice smile. My bro opened with âHiâ (simple and works), she said âhiâ. I asked where they were headed, to stop them from walking on. They said a bar; I said, âwhy donât you put that off for a minute and chill with us.â They were from out of town, stuck on a layover on their way to south America. Perfect lol. At that exact moment, my other bro was getting picked up to go to a hockey game and we had a natural time constraint. I tossed the blonde my phone and told her to give me her number, we will meet up with them in a few minutes. She did as told and we partedâŠ
âŠ45 minutes later, I texted her. A game of missed calls/missed texts occurred as my remaining bro and I walked and stopped at bars. While I was pissing at random bar, blondie texted me to come meet them â but when I went to get my bro he had already opened a new 2-set (lol another HB8 blonde and a 6.5 latina, dĂ©jĂ vu). He told me later they had been ordering drinks near him and he opened with an indignant but playful, ââŠso whereâs my shot?â which got the ball rolling.
When I returned I introduced myself and instantly stole the sunglasses off of blonde#2 head and put them on. Both broads complimented me on the way the glasses looked, so I knew it was gonna go well. Started kinoing, touching a tattoo on Latina girl and then lifting up the back of blonde#2 shirt to âcheckâ if she had tattoo in same spot. They started return-firing kino at me and my boy. Blonde2 told me, âI donât like latin guysâ I replied, âgood I donât like white girls.â The gleam in her eye told of moisture forming down below lol. Lots of laser eyes. I let her catch me staring at her tits. Shortly after found out Latina2 was married (but no ring on tonight cuz she likes attention, imagine that lol) and blondie2 had a boyfriend. Found this out after I tried getting blonde2âs number and got blown out.
Once me and my bro realized it was getting late and these chicks would take some work, we decided to shake and head home. The girls were definitely surprised. As we walked away to go home, I send a final text the blonde#1, âlike ships in the night, maybe in another life, later.â Imagine my surprise when she called me 20 seconds later. I told her to be where we met in 1 minute or we are gone. They were lol.
We went to a new bar. I took off the silly hat blonde1 had been wearing all day and put it on me, where it stayed for the rest of the night. I started pawing at her playfully, which she returned. A random girl walked by next to me, intending to give someone she knew a girlscout cookie; I stole it out of her hand and ate it. The girl I stole it from smiled, laughed and gave me a dap. The girls we were with lost their shit, laughing. Blonde2 and Latina2 from the last bar suddenly appeared and placed themselves in proximity to us (now I wonder if they went there to find us lol). So I said hi to them but didnât invite them to join us. This of course demonstrated to Blonde1 and Latina1 that we had other options.
I went in for the kiss on blonde1 but she turned to the side. I was buzzed so I said fuck it and gently planted a single kiss on the tattoo behind her ear. She said that was the first time someone has ever kissed her without her permission lol; she definitely liked it cuz laser eyes went into overdrive. My boy was off with latina1 making out somewhere isolated. Blonde1 qualified herself to me by bragging/putting down the texts she was getting constantly from other men she had met that day that were trying to meet up with her. We flirted a bit more, kino, got her to give me a kiss on the cheek for a selfie.
Then me and boy said we had to split (tired from being at the beach all day and his gf was blowing up both our phones but we never answer). They were shocked. A moment later, blonde1 asked if they could have a ride back to their hotel; I said sure but we should hit the hot tub to make it worth the drive. They said they werenât sure if their hotel had one but they were game.
Once we were in their hotel room, I told blonde1, âhey this is a nice hotel, why donât you show me the hallwaysâŠâ with an evil smirk. This was to give my boy a chance to get down with his chick and see if mine had warmed up a bit more. She said, ââŠyeah, sureâŠâ Once we were outside in the hallway we were making out. I led her to the ice machine room. I put her against the wall and was making out, feeling her up, did that thing where I went from above lifted her bikini top and was playing with her nips. She was going nuts, âI never sleep with guys the first time I meet emâŠâ, basically ASD kicked in hard.
Suddenly I could hear my bro bellowing my name in the hallway. He was ready to leave ASAP (latina1 didnât want to fuck, just wanted to fool around and my bro wanted to split cuz he knew his wifey was pissed). Kissed blonde1 goodbye. She remembered my phone was back in her room so a few more kisses and we were gone. She wants to meet up next time shes in townâŠ
Married for three years and have to agree with these findings. In my marriage she does it all: cooking, cleaning, laundry along with working part time outside of the home. Oh she occasionally bitches about it. I just laugh and ask if she would like to start bringing in the wood ( we heat with wood during the winter). Despite her occasional bitching that âI never help out with the domestic shoresâ she puts out regularly and BJs are plentiful. I think we will continue with what works here at my house.
[CH: bravissimo]
Do you think itâs a correlation. Those men who do feminine tasks are possibly not masculine enough to be say a blue collar worker with muscles and a big ego. As a very girly girl, I love men to be men but I like masculine female friends too (I enjoy feeling protected) and they genuinely go off on those feminine type of guys. I think youâll find those alpha females with softer guys have great sex. I think itâs the ultra feminine women who dont like their partners to do female type housework but in the same breath when they dont, the female gets exhausted and ends up too tired to have sex.
I have the answer, Cleaners (until we fix up this evolution stuff â our brains and our hormones need to find common ground because itâs so confusing being female). Once upon a time manly men were sought after to protect the tribe but now that stress comes from being stressed and overworked, women desire more egalitarian type relationships but unfortunately our biology wants those men from the days of our great great great grandparents. Stupid DNA, it makes me desire bad boys. Good thing my husband looks like a King of Kings but is a sweetie too.
Even though my wife cant cook for shit, and I clean up after myself, I can verify the results â I have to revert back to game to get a tingle these days. Sucks being retired at 50 when it comes to hamsters. Oh well, time to get two in reserve. I still wonât take her seriously and it drives her bat shit but every once in a while her torrent breaks a few branches of the oak tree.
Peace out, CH đ