It’s hard to choose one face that stands — or scrunches — above the rest as the iconic social justice warrior (SJW) face. But I believe I have found it.
This Harry Potter tranny was snapped at a Ferguson protest in Portland. Like most SJWs, she is a raving beauty. That knitted brow which will never unknot. Those beady, judgmental eyes. The boycut. The thin, sexless lips pressed into a perpetual Puritan’s scold.
The overall impression one gets is of that fat judge with the testicle chin in Pink Floyd’s ‘The Wall’.
All she(?)’s missing is the pitchfork and torchlit mob, and a witch to burn for heresy against the Church of Anti-Racism.
If only degenerate SJWs could see themselves the way others see them…. I doubt anything would change. Cult religions and their followers are immune to the emotions and sympathies that sway normal people.
dumb kunt
she needs to be culturally enriched. I applaud when one of these dumb white broads gets the ultimate enrichment from her buck
Time for some eye bleach:
http://allkman.tumblr.com/page/650
Ah, Allkman. 1500+ pages of female beauty. It is a sobering thought that one of the main motivations of feminism is to destroy this kind of beauty. As a wise man said, envy is one of the strongest forces in politics.
She needs to loosen up and enjoy a nice, leisurely dinner of foot-long hot dogs served in warm, steamed buns. With relish.
Dollars to donuts says she’s into BDSM. There was a NoCal dude at the old iSteve, named Albertosaurus, who might have crossed paths with her. The outfit says dyke BDSM, acting as the Dom, and any of her affairs with the male of the species would involve very painful acts visited upon the man’s testes. Although Doms ought to be sufficiently cynical to know that all of these Frankfurt-School-orchestrated phenomena, like Ferguson, are complete panem-et-circenses charades. Maybe she’s trolling for naive gullible true-believer coeds to serve as her Subs [and maybe her coed Subs could finance her lifestyle via Daddy Warbucks’s VISA card]? If you ever cross paths with her, then slap her titties hard and her pussy even harder.
Dominant women are quite rare–the few that exist can make a living doing it.
Statistics say she’s probably a sub, and I can confirm there are quite a few self-described feminists who enjoy getting spanked–they’ve convinced themselves it’s ‘transgressive’ rather than following traditional roles.
If you can say the right words, you can lead them around on leashes and literally crack the whip in the privacy of your own home. 😉 Trust me, folks, if you’ve never spanked a woman with her own copy of ‘Lean In’, I recommend you try it.
W_o_r_d_p_r_e_s_s swallowed my *B*D*S*M* komment.
[…] The Iconic SJW Face […]
Great photo! But you had your choice of them from that article(except for the jaboons who were mostly waiting around for someone else to start looting a liquor store or a cellphone store.
This particular photo though, brought to mind the scenes in “Dr. Zhivago”, showing the idealistic, oh-so-earnest revolutionary and first husband of Lara, Pasha Antipov, played ably by Tom Courtney. That same cold fish fish distant stare gazing only at the future of, not human beings individually, but “humanity”.
SJWs love humanity, but hate human beings.
Yeah, but Pasha morphed in to Strelnikov. Real men only need one name…
When I watched that movie, I was young enough for it to seem quite meaningful.
We did Fiddler on the Roof as our fifth grade musical. It’s pretty hilarious now to look back on it and realize what it was really about. Same with the old movies like “High Noon” – I remember the first time I saw HN and I was wondering A) Why are the townsfolk behaving so strangely? and B) Why is this dreck supposed to be some sort of a masterpiece of cinema canon?
Re Who/Where doing Fiddler On The Roof. Funny comment;but what was it really about?
“Real men need only one name…”
Perhaps in honorable places and times.
But we don’t live in that milieu. Our Chateau-master has several names. So do I and so, it seems, do you.
Virtually all the major figures in the Russian Revolution, etc. came up with bullshit names for themselves that were purposefully adapted to being weaponized as one-word invocations.
Stalin, Trotsky, Ho Chi Ming, Lenin – they were all made up names.
In Boris Pasternaks novel,the transition of the beta Pasha Antinov into the blood-drenched “Strelnikov” was almost a parody of this phenomenon. In the story, when Pasha realized that the hottie Julie Christi still wanted the evil, powerful older guy(even after he had rescued and married her), he felt the need to go off and kill a few million people.
Virtually all the major figures in the Russian Revolution, etc. came up with bullshit names for themselves that were purposefully adapted to being weaponized as one-word invocations.
Yep, I suspect it started as a way for the overwhelmingly Jewish leadership to hide their … “ethnic” names.
Lev Davidovitch Bronstein. – Trotsky, for example. He had dozens of aliases before he settled for “Trotsky”, which was supposedly the name of “one of his prison guards in Siberia” websites will tell you. This is false, as the “prison” was to walk around freely in a Siberian town and have a job and his own home. Far different from the death camps the communists set up in Siberia later.
Lenin means “Leader”. Strange how we never hear that. Hitler is ridiculed for using the title Führer, wrongly translated to Leader. In fact it means the one who drives a carriage or other vehicle. But the one who actually used the name Leader, Lenin, is never called on it.
Stalin means “Steelman”, and we never hear about that either. Khamenev meant “Hammer”, and then there’s Molotov, Zinoviev … so many changed names.
Much like communists constantly change the names of their organizations so that people won’t be able to connect them to past crimes. This constant change of names and symbols is possible only because their ideology is based on lies, and it takes a special, warped mind to be part of that. For normal people it would feel wrong to constantly change the facade, and people would leave such a group. But for communists that’s what’s in their nature.
This particular photo though, brought to mind the scenes in “Dr. Zhivago”, showing the idealistic, oh-so-earnest revolutionary and first husband of Lara, Pasha Antipov, played ably by Tom Courtney.
Nailed it… lozlzozlzozlzozlozlzolzolzol
Discussion of Psychiatric Hypnotic techniques: Who is Leading and Financing the Orc Army of the Left? http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/who_is_leading_and_financing_the_orc_army_of_the_left.html
“Who is Leading and Financing the Orc Army of the Left?”
The link is to American Thinker and they know well who the leaders and financiers are but they avoid the Third Rail like the plague.
OlayDave: “This particular photo though, brought to mind the scenes in “Dr. Zhivago…”
Ha! Couldn’t put my finger on it, but you’re absolutely right. Strelnikov in drag, only uglier and nuttier.
‘That same cold fish fish distant stare gazing only at the future of, not human beings individually, but “humanity”.’
Fishbowl glasses really seem to bring that look out.
i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/10/01/article-2440732-00080C2300000C1D-798_306x423.jpg
s1.trrsf.com/blogs/331/files/image/heinrichhimmlerhimmler3-1.jpg
jasobrecht.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/John-lennon-White-Album.jpg
Horrifying. That is the face of your executioner.
What happened to America…
Its men were too nice to its women.
The face of every fucking commissar and Red Guard in history.
Absolutely. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c1/Red_Guards.jpg
Growing up in a former communist country, I did evolve a preternatural ability to tell which of the politicians of my country will be busted for having spilled the beans to the state political police during communism and you’re partially right. The commissars and informers combined had a look that exhibited guile too though(at least the higher ups).
Yes, but what made her like that? Actually I think she’s potentially quite good-looking. 30 minutes with Rastus in the cot would work wonders for her.
Closer still: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilse_Koch
The Bitch of Buchenwald.
“Ilse Koch” by Ilse_Koch.jpg: unknown soldier or employee of the U.S. Army Signal Corps
derivative work: PawełMM (talk) – Ilse_Koch.jpg. Licensed under Public Domain via Wikimedia Commons.
Yes, this was exactly what went through my mind when I saw her Sovietesque face.
The nose ring.
Some of you may have heard of Oscar Wilde’s 1938 radio show that was of course complete fiction but that was so damn convincing it made masses of people completely freak out because they thought it was real?
Well the reason tens of thousands of people are protesting, rioting looting, beating up people in places such as Ferguson and the reason why yesterday one of them shot and killed two New York City police officer is the in the same category as that 1938 radio;
FICTION.
COMPLETE FICTION.
It is complete fiction that white police officers are shooting blacks as if it was a sports. The facts are that statistics show that a larger proportion of whites are being shot by police every year.
It is complete fiction that blacks are victims of an epidemy of violent crimes committed by racist non-blacks. The facts are that over 90% of the time blacks are murdered by other blacks and not by white police officers.
It is complete fiction that blacks are mistreated by the police, by whites, by society or that Hollywood should present a more favorable image of blacks. The facts are the exact opposite; blacks are coddled and pampered by the whole system while whites are punished severely ( the media destroys their reputation, they are fired etc etc ) for harmless little unimportant “unpleasant” words,
and what about Hollywood? The facts are that the whole entertainment business ALWAYS makes black people in every movie tv shows, tv ad the nicest, cleanest, most decent, most brilliant , most respectable person
Not ONE single damn reason why tens of thousands of people are protesting is anymore real than the tooth fairy is.
My dear American friends and neighbors, when the civil war breaks out- and it looks like it will in a not too distant future with idiots like Obama and DeBlasio siding with violent savages – get the main stream media first and destroy it completely.
If I was a religious man I would say the liberal left – and the main stream media which is an arm of the liberal left – are the devil.
It is the left and their media who have emboldened a man to murder two innocent police officers yesterday
The left and their main stream media are pure evil.
PURE EVIL.
I thought it was the other O.W. – Orson Welles.
My mistake, it is Orson Welles.
My enemies cannot speak a truthful word. Their deepest desire is to destroy others. Their talk is foul, like the stench from an open grave. Their tongues are filled with flattery. Psalms 5:9
Nice one.
I prefer ‘The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves’ – very relevant as you start to descend through all the purposeful misinformation out there.
+111
Our man in Florida, Rush Limbaugh, has been throwing down some powerful and deeply intimate confessionals about this shiznat lately – about how in retrospect he should have seen all this coming 20 years ago – the forces who are now aligned to destroy Western Civilization. By far the best [and most passionate] work of his career. Makes “Born Free” Animal Rights Updates look like child’s play by comparison.
@EK: the communists fucked up because they didn’t have fake opposition. And because their system of producing goods is awful.
“the communists fucked up because they didn’t have fake opposition.”
I am sadly coming to realize they did – the West.
AJ had some kind of apologia show on last night…some nignog was complaining about how he couldn’t get a job or something or other…”when they found out I had a felony.” WTF. And he asks “wtf am I supposed to do??” The “reporter” at no point asked the obvious- “how about NOT commit felonies? Did you ever think of that?” Of course, asking that question would expose him to anger, then rage, then probably more felonies from the group of blacks he was documenting.
Police officers that murder a man for selling cigarettes and get away with it are what “emboldened” this particular bad guy.
There is no substitute for accountability.
Riiiiiights… and that’s why CVS stopped selling cigs… they didn’t want a SWAT team storming the pharmacy counters.
You are absolutely right about the state of things today.
One thing though: the radio broadcast in 1938 did not make people freak out. That was something the media invented afterward. People interviewed have said they knew perfectly well the radio broadcast was for entertainment, and everyone else around them knew that too. I think the story about people being frightened, without telling us exactly how many those were, is for entertainment value like urban legends. And possibly to make White America look foolish.
It looks like it wants to be John Lennon
LOL!
Her disappointment was palpable upon hearing of the failure of her petition to make “Imagine” the national anthem.
It also wants to look like it’s ‘concerned’ about issues or something, but the under-eye compression just looks like an accurate depiction of its hate
also what the hell is the thing in the lower left here
It’s Dave Barry!
A Jew
“What the hell is that?” The first generation of a person who contributes 0 to the gene pool, raised on liberalism, vegan diet, no iodized salt, vaccinated to the hilt. Its not even an empty shell is worse is an abomination.
And fuck ugly Japanese broads?
We align with truth. They align with power. In the long run truth always wins.
“In the long run truth always wins.”
That isn’t true.
Is that a true statement?
Does truth always win? Or just that the winners decide what is true?
I’d like to think that, but I think even yourself would admit this doesnt happen. Have we not lived at least 300+ years of vast disinformation? Perhaps the most prevalent of recent lies that Germany was the ‘bad guys’ in ww2?
Whenever a country or another is labeled as the good or bad guys in anything, you’re reading propaganda.
Spot on ER. I think we’re a million miles from ever finding out the truth. As you say WW 2/Germany are classic examples, but add in the Holocau$t, Pearl Harbor, 9/11……the truth of these events will never become generally known.
Nazi Germany was indeed one of “the bad guys” in WWII. The others were Italy, Japan, the rest of the Axis, and the USSR.
Haywood Jablone. Would you like to let us know then who the Good Guys were? Was it the USA, the country that dropped the A Bomb on two defenseless cities? Or Britain and France, the ones that declared war on Germany for invading Poland but became allies of the Soviets who invaded Poland at the same time? Or the broader Allies who pulverised German cities, killing hundreds of thousands and destroying millenia-old buildings….. long after there was any military need?
Or was it the countries that came up with the Morgenthau Plan the effect of which was to exterminate the German people and turn Germany into a wasteland?
Yes, please tell who the Good Guys were?
The question is not so much about Good Guys and Bad Guys in WWII – it’s much more about A) Who won the war? and B) Who lost the peace? [Hint: They’re trick questions in that they both have the same answer.] Our fate was probably sealed when Sarnoff was able to destroy Farnsworth and prevent the Shkotzim from taking the lead in television. It’s very difficult to overemphasize just how evil Sarnoff really was. That and of course Jekyll Island.
Nazi Germany was indeed one of “the bad guys” in WWII. The others were Italy, Japan, the rest of the Axis, and the USSR.
————————————————————————————————
Axis of Evil?
You should listen less to FauX News
The vocabulary betrays a foxtard just needed to add that democracy won
But we all know who won, the disaster that we see and have to live through is the direct result of the victory
Idea that the truth always wins in the end is utterly ridiculous, your very statement is the testament to it
Whole postwar era is nothing but a constant perpetuation of lies, the whole system is based on deception in accordance with true nature of its creators,
a perfect mirror in which only blinds cannot see the true victors of WW2
And that is were the ultimate defeat lies- in altering the essence of civilization toward each it was striving for more tan 2000 years
The essence of striving towards truth, courage and honesty (sometimes successfully or more often unsuccessfully depending on the age) was replaced by different values which reflect the new rulers like above mentioned mirror reflects the ugliness of the creature standing in front of it
Only in such a world Clintons and their ilk can thrive and be considered as an example to follow by other sociopaths and large brain dead masses which typical sample would cowardly pass by a man being killed on a street turning the head on the other side and quickening the pace
Nazi Germany was indeed one of “the bad guys” in WWII. The others were Italy, Japan, the rest of the Axis, and the USSR.
Ah, the complete historical ignorance of the brainwashed, who will of course NEVER read up on actual facts because it is forbidden.
Funny how you guys never mention the little fact that, for example, Poland’s dictator Pilsudski asked France three times for a joint invasion of Germany, which the Germans found out about the second time. Or that the Polish army and police beat Germans in the streets and forced them from their homes as a calculated provocation. Or that they had agreed to start these provocations in a plan together with Britain, after which Britain was supposed to immediately attack Germany and give more German lands to the Poles. Or that Churchill’s massive debts were bought by a group of political-minded Jews, who gave him a monthly retainer. Or that the Soviet Union was massing troops on the border in preparation for an invasion of Germany. Or that Britain and France attacked Germany, not the other way around, and Germany repeatedly asked for peace negotiations and would withdraw from all lands in the West, even when they had just taken France and the British had been sent packing.
Let’s forget little things like that. Right?
Characters like that are quick to call for basketball-orange freight cars once they have significant contact with actual people of color.
The bangs are a classic SJW bitch tell.
As are the glasses http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20111022160245/scoobydoo/images/4/4a/Velma_DC_Double_Trouble.png
She only looks like that cause neither Fred, nor Daphne or Shaggy will shack up with her.
Nor Scooby.
Though she was observed smearing peanut butter on her cunt and calling “Here, Scooby, Scooby, Scooby…”, alas, to no avail.
Oh, but Scooby did. And that Scrappy bastard was the result.
This picture is evil. I saw this shit in my reader and nearly had a fucking seizure. Well played CH, well played.
That knitted brow which will never unknot.
+1 on the Taming Of The Shrew reference.
I’ll take my cookie now. 😉
Portland. Quelle surprise!
if only she could get dumped into night of the living undocumented shopping spree…
Yes, the fact we can pretty accurately determine who is a leftist based on how they look is good evidence that they place a high value or place emphasis on their own social status.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-games/201305/how-do-people-view-women-tattoos
That or Johnny Depp
If ever there was a hatchet-faced, volvo-driving, “can make macrame from their armpit hair” face, this is it.
If you looked up “pill” in the dictionary, you’d see that picture.
Similar
Feminism = collective sh!t test
She looks like Heinrich Himmler with a nose ring.
This one is more of an enraged feminist with saliva coming out of her mouth
However the resemblance is striking (small narrow lips betraying luck of femininity )
The second thing is just possessed with rage that is to say it is in the second stage of empowerment
No man would touch this even if armed with 6 ft pole
The last time I saw a mouth like that, it had a hook in it.
lzzzzzoollllzlz
Great one-liners in the comments, today.
Oh, but on her it looks good. :eyeroll: :duckface:
The last time I saw a mouth like that, it had a hook in it.
LOL IRL
One has to wonder about this butch. Did she actually put on rouge, or did someone just b-slap her without damaging her glasses?
That was last year’s iconic SJW face.
oh I must have missed last year award winning ceremony
For a ’60s version try Shulamith Firestone.
Dude,I read a portrait of this bitch in The New Yorker,(a rare article that was actually readable). Spawn of hell itself. Rigid Ortho-Jew fambly;hates her Hitlerian father.Foul ugly vicious bitch.Had a lover–maybe a nigga,it didn’t say–a bad boy used to beat her senseless. Brother committed suicide. She buried him in a jew cemetery,didnt tell the rabbi he killed himself til later,cuz he wouldn’t have been allowed there if she had,lol. ” She” would make Portland bitch look like J-Law! And a subtext of the article was thateverything these “protesters” did,they were successful. Bitch wrote articles,books? They got published. TV shows? No problem. Press coverage? Great. Academia? Right witcha..etc.
Congoleum Breckenridge
A little-known bit of trivia about Shulamith: her picture in her high school yearbook was encaptioned, “most likely to end up eaten by her cats”.
What this lady is confuses us for various reasons, but she is as old as the Massachusetts Colony which for some reason went on a witch-hunting binge. One of my ancestors was hanged by the neck at 72 in Salem for basically being deaf at that age and not hearing the judge’s final question. Her name was Rebecca Towne Nurse and the hanging took place early the next morning and her body was flung into a ditch from which her adult children removed her for proper burial.
I suspect those making charges of witchcraft looked a lot like the lady above. The diverse white American peoples have always been plagued by a small segment of righteous, judgmental, murderous people like her. She may travel under the flag of social justice but this particular lady in these particular times is one of the new white supremacists, the old white supremacists having dwindled to a feeble group of white separatists.
This lady undoubtedly believes she is an “ally” of the peoples of color, but she is really a witch-hunter seeking whom she may destroy. If readers discount the label of “new white supremacist” for this lady, consider how she seeks to motivate peoples of color to hate the rest of us…how she longs to reenact the Haitian revolution…how she would scoop up blood to cascade over her face.
And consider how she operates with peoples of color…as “kindly bent to ease them” in the same way missionaries in Africa a century ago worked to interrupt the social and religious ways of those they encountered there to secure a commitment to a new faith (i.e., a new ideology) exactly as she works with peoples of color here today.
The fun part is how she and her cohort seek personal publicity and front row seats at demonstrations and parades, and then suffer rebuke at the hands of the peoples of color she had pretended to befriend. The ultimate act at her hands is to demand of peoples of color the right to designate those who are not authentic this or that, and thus must be excluded.
After removing her lip ring (you can see the nasty hole), she came out to judge in a scary way indeed and uphold her new white supremacist role.
Bo Sears: “…the old white supremacists having dwindled to a feeble group of white separatists.”
Oh, the irony is rich, here. You pretend that you are attacking the SJW, yet you and her are in perfect agreement where it counts. The real monster is the white separatist under the bed! LOL!
It is pathetic to falsely conflate the perfectly normal desire of a people (yes, including white people) to have their own sovereignty and achieve their own continuity, with the sick and malevolent destruction desired by the SJW. These two impulses, one toward protection and the other toward destruction, have absolutely nothing to do with one another, except as opposites.
Bo Sears: “If readers discount the label of “new white supremacist” for this lady…”
It’s obvious that your ridiculous label should be discounted, as it is fundamentally dishonest. The impulse to destroy is in direct contrast to the impulse to preserve and protect. Your treating them as the same is ludicrous.
Bo Sears: “One of my ancestors was hanged by the neck at 72 in Salem for basically being deaf at that age and not hearing the judge’s final question.”
Color me surprised. You’re descended from nutters, self-righteous lunatics searching for witches to burn (one of your “witches” being those evil white separatists – guilty of the crime of wishing that their people survive). That one of your ancestors ended up on the wrong end of the gallows for being hard of hearing changes nothing – you come from sanctimonious madmen.
The main difference between you and your insane forebears is that they exhibited their nuttiness more or less honestly and forthrightly, whereas you are given to cheap conflation and obfuscation. I suppose the blood has thinned (or did some YKW enter it at some point?), but its impulse towards nastiness remains. I’m sure you saw a white nationalist, or maybe Goody Proctor, with the devil!
Bo Sears: “After removing her lip ring (you can see the nasty hole), she came out to judge in a scary way indeed and uphold her new white supremacist role.”
LOL! What a clown you are.
Silly knee jerk response. It is obvious OP isn’t even talking about modern white nationalists, except for the brief mention of white separatists at the beginning. Nor is he passing judgement on or even discussing the desire of anyone to live in ethnically homogeneous communities. If your takeaway from that post was some sort of anti-white message, I think you need to read it again without the ideological filter.
It’s obvious you are heavily invested in the WN narrative, and thus interpret almost everything through that lens, but I would encourage you not to let *any* ideology completely colonize your mind. It really does turn you into a much more shallow and limited thinker.
Waldganger: “It is obvious OP isn’t even talking about modern white nationalists, except for the brief mention of white separatists at the beginning.”
In other words, he wasn’t at all talking about modern white nationalists…except when he was. LOL!
Waldganger: “If your takeaway from that post was some sort of anti-white message, I think you need to read it again without the ideological filter.”
No ideological filter is required. He was attempting to conflate white racial consciousness with SJW lunacy, pretending that they both stem from the same mindset. They don’t, and to claim so is dishonest and ridiculous.
Waldganger: “It’s obvious you are heavily invested in the WN narrative, and thus interpret almost everything through that lens, but I would encourage you not to let *any* ideology completely colonize your mind.”
I’m heavily invested in the survival of my people, not any particular ideology (unless “survival” qualifies as an ideology). And I’ve been to enough rodeos to be quite familiar with the various cons and obfuscations that are employed by anti-whites. It’s not uncommon to run into the “you’re just like X,” when in fact, we’re nothing like X. If a poster obfuscates a relevant distinction, either by design or by ignorance, then he needs to be called out on it.
What Bo is doing is attacking SJWs on a blog that he knows is hostile to SJW’s, in order to establish common ground. Then he laces the attack with an anti-white message. There is another commenter here that does the same. Maybe they are the same guy, who knows? All I can go by is the message and general effect of a post, and assume that either the guy is an idiot, or that he intends the message that he sent.
In any event, either Bo is an anti-white, which is what I would bet, or he needs to develop greater precision in his thinking and writing. If you read his post and conclude that it was helpful to white nationalism, or even neutral toward it, you’re kidding yourself.
Knock off the sock puppy routine, Wald… everyone with an eye to read knows the general message appears pro-White… but the use of those key-word shibboleths leave the majority impression on the audience, and it seems just too coincidental that it’s merely a turn of the phrase, as it were.
Peddle the apologetics and Cathedral “you’re just narrow-minded” snark elsewhere.
Previous post was eaten, so I’ll take another stab. Bo clearly links white separatism to white supremacism: “…the old white supremacists having dwindled to a feeble group of white separatists.” He did not have to do this. He goes out of his way to make the link.
He then spends the rest of the post linking white supremacism to SJW-style destruction, as if they represented the same mentality. They do not. The purpose of Bo’s post was clearly to conflate the SJW impulse to destroy with the white nationalist impulse to protect and secure, even though the two are actually opposites. Either that, or he’s just a very sloppy writer. I’m betting on the former.
This isn’t rocket science, and we’re not deciphering the Rosetta Stone. It’s all there in the King’s English. But hey, you and the loopy Pyjama Boy below can believe whatever you like. Let’s face it, whites didn’t get in the bind we’re in today by being overly perceptive. Anti-whites, on the other hand, can generally sniff out a pro-white in a New York minute.
And if this was really a misunderstanding, which I doubt, why didn’t Bo come out and clear it up, and tell us that he is in fact in favor of white survival and continuity? He didn’t because he isn’t.
Silly knee jerk response. It is obvious OP isn’t even talking about modern white nationalists, except for the brief mention of white separatists at the beginning.
Hello, sock puppet. Anyone who uses the slur “white supremacist” has exposed his leftist leanings. Bye.
Great deconstruction, Train…
Lawdy, if only Matt King would return, we’d have both the Sacred and Secular neo-Menckians, here at the chateau.
It has been said that people fled Europe to the colonies not to escape religious persecution but that they were kicked out for being a damn nuisance to everyone else.
Hence why Thanksgiving should be an European holiday too. We should call it Thanksleaving.
It has been said that people fled Europe to the colonies not to escape religious persecution but that they were kicked out for being a damn nuisance to everyone else.
False.
Even if you are joking, that kind of quip is meant to spread cynicism and self-loathing.
“Rebecca Towne Nurse”
Oh. My. God. I have actually dipped it in one of her descendants. Who was drop-dead gorgeous and who came and came and came and came for me. Under different circumstances I would have married her.
There is actually an idiom for this in minland Chinese, or there used to be back in Cultural Revolution days: 阶级斗争脸 (jieji douzheng lian: “class struggle face.”
From the point of view of Biological Calvinism, what fascinates me is the question of fecundity – whether these Nurse Ratcheds ever got around to having any children of their own or whether eventually they just grew old and barren and childless. [I’m thinking of your joke about how the 1-Child Policy has devolved into the Chinese parents begging their daughters for even just one single grandchild.] It seems like eventually either the Rosa Luxemburgs and the Emma Goldmans are going to unbreed themselves right out of existence, or else secretly they are having babies on the sly, and their public personae of anti-human anti-life rigid doctrinaire bulldykery is simply for fooling the poor stupid village girls into going chiildless. Otherwise, Jehovah must have wired some seriously deep-seated insanity into our DNA, if our species keeps spitting out the Nurse Ratched Bulldyke Macbethian Witches via some sort of a random evil-generator.
They’re like deleterious mutations. They pop up from time to time, and have to be bred out. Although given the Zeitgeist, we seem to be getting an extra large helping of this at the moment.
Or, to borrow from Ian Fleming:
“The tricoteuses of the French Revolution must have had faces like hers, decided Kronsteen…. The thinning orange hair scraped back to the tight, obscene bun; the shiny yellow-brown eyes that stared so coldly at General G. through the sharp-edged squares of glass, the wedge of thickly powdered, large-pored nose; the wet trap of a mouth, that went on opening and shutting as if it was operated by wires under the chin. Those French women, as they sat and knitted and chatted while the guillotine clanged down, must have had the same pale, thick chicken’s skin that scragged in little folds under the eyes and at the corners of the mouth and below the jaws, the same big peasant’s ears, the same tight, hard dimpled fists, like knobkerries, that, in the case of the Russian woman, now lay tightly clenched on the red velvet table-top on either side of the big bundle of bosom.”
There is actually an idiom for this in minland Chinese, or there used to be back in Cultural Revolution days: 阶级斗争脸 (jieji douzheng lian): “class struggle face.”
Now that is interesting. I wonder, were Chinese women particularly given to posturing, like this? Or was it somewhat evenly spread among the sexes? I suspect it was not.
I once read an article (as a kid) in Readers Digest ’bout the Red Guard,written by a white man who got caught up in it. And indeed he did say that the Chinese bitches were especuially virulent.He noted–and this is weird–at one point a group of whitse were being arrested or moved,and had to be brought thru an angry crowd. He said the Chi-bitches would try with great effort to kick the white guys in the balls. Make of it what you will.
I suspect it was not evenly distributed between male and female. Posit: Females respond to, and apply, social pressure based on reputation, whereas males apply it on basis of cooperation. Facial expression among women: powerful motivator. Facial expression among men: yah really. Catch this football, asshole.
Class struggle face: that begs for more common use in American English.
You’ve nailed it here CH. She’s just perfect. Your description of her is brilliant.
She should be stuffed and put in a museum for future generations to look at as a warning example.
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
Thanks, Trainspotter, for your comments. Perhaps you can try reading what I said slowly and sound out the words.
Don’t worry, Bo. I read it. Didn’t even need to move my lips while I did so.
In fact, I read it twice before posting, just to make sure you weren’t merely making the obvious point that these white SJW types view non-whites as mere props and pets. We all know that, it’s like saying the sky is blue. You can even call it a particularly sick form of “white supremacy,” but if so it is a form that has nothing to do with white nationalism, separatism, or even just traditional white attitudes about race. The traditional South, for example, was not populated by the type of girl pictured above. It was animated by an entirely different impulse, an entirely different spirit.
The SJW desire to undermine and destroy has absolutely nothing in common with the white separatist/nationalist desire to preserve and protect. Your post has the effect of dishonestly obscuring this vital distinction.
I believe that is what you intended to do. You write much like another poster here, who occasionally feigns support while inevitably pushing an anti-white message. But if I’m wrong, you might worry more about the quality and precision of your writing than my reading comprehension.
Wait a minute,dont romanticize the South. The slaveowner Aristocrats were the lowest back-stabbing class of shit this nation ever produced–outside of the obvious. (That’s right Spirit Within!)They fucked the rednecks 7 ways to Sunday. (Once read this story bout this Mint Julep motherfucker,after manumission,went to BRAZIL to try and own some niggers. Just evil shit. ) whiskey,I think,wrote a good piece in Sailer ’bout Sherman,who,on his march to the sea,sought to spare the lives of the sodbusters. He had many friends in the South before the war. The slaveowners had NO such concerns about the white confederates.
“Wait a minute,dont romanticize the South.”
But there is much about the South that is romantic.
“The slaveowner Aristocrats were the lowest back-stabbing class of shit this nation ever produced–outside of the obvious.”
I wouldn’t go nearly that far about the old Southern aristocracy, but I’ll agree that its flaws were legion. I also agree with your general criticism of backstabbing elites. Today, they plague virtually every white nation, at least in the West. This is why I often say that we need a new elite, one that is committed to the long term survival and development of our people. In the long run, that’s the only way to prevent white genocide.
In any event, I only brought up the South as an obvious example of “white supremacy” (a concept that I do not support, by the way) that had absolutely nothing in common with the nutty, malevolent SJW mindset. Bo was lamely attempting to conflate the two, but they represent entirely different impulses and mentalities.
The sick SJW mindset does not trace its roots back to traditional racial attitudes. Instead, in America at least, it comes right out of the nutty Puritan mentality, combined with cultural marxism straight from YKW. A really nasty, vicious mix, it manages to combine the worst of two already nutty and malice-filled worlds, which I suppose is an accomplishment of sorts.
Bo Sears (BS, how a propos… but I digress), don’t try to snow the Snow Man. Learn to lose gracefully.
Note I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt in re your sincerity… if I find you’re just another mask for the usual suspect Sunstein shills that stink up the chateau, I’ll be giving you one in the yarbles… if’n ya got any.
Wouldn’t really call triggering the delusions of an intellectual fruitcake losing.
Depends upon whose ox got gored, I suppose… you work your corner, I’ll work mine.
Nope need black rimmed glasses
Only Ms. Puff.
She looks like her filthy cunt reeks of vinegar mixhed with rotten fish feces.
Egads. The face of a desexed fraulein overseeing the queued deballing of all the American-born males in line for the slaughterhouse.
When your face is a boner killer, your personality follows.
Ya wanna bet she’s got a pack of limp wristed orbiters salivating at the thought of getting a sniff of that fetid crotch?
Dunno mate. That seems a stretch. Although I am constantly surprised, so all bets are off.
This reminds me of every face in Vermont.
No wonder it has America’s lowest birth rate.
Try being raised by the government schools there. I have to read great works of western philosophy nightly just to keep my conditioned crimethink impulse in check.
We all know that, it’s like saying the sky is blue. You can even call it a particularly sick form of “white supremacy,”…
I’m 100% sure the allegedly boring 1950s weren’t anywhere near so predictable:
http://vultureofcritique.wordpress.com/2014/12/22/8chan-reviews-the-movie-wild-adapted-from-an-oprah-book-club-best-seller/
8chan reviews the movie Wild, adapted from an Oprah Book Club best-seller
An 8Chan Anon has written:
>wife reads book
>asks me to go to a girl hiking movie
Ok I had no expectations going into this movie and no foreknowledge about it.
True story Oprah book club #1 best seller
degeneracy the movie
>girl raised by single mom
>single mom dies
>girl Cheats on loving husband
>literally fucks million guys
>does Herion constantly
>get divorced finally
>decides to go on a 1k mile hike
>at the end of the hike accepts that all her fucking around on her husband, being a whore degenerate was ok because she found a new husband and had kids and it worked out ok in the end.
The only bit I like about Oprah is in that flick when a cop smacks her in the face with a pistol butt.
Couldn’t happen to a better little yid:
“Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s 17-year-old son was robbed Friday night across the street from his family’s North Side home, leaving him with a chipped tooth and fat lip, a source told the Sun-Times’ Michael Sneed.”
[…] It’s in my long term interest to only dog-whistle on the really interesting issues, lest the social media justice warriors take notice (fuck those people BTW). Trust me, this is a book we want to […]
Black lives matter?
Not to black thugs.
http://chicago.suntimes.com/crime/7/71/223301/dad-says-man-killed-calumet-city-leaving-army-proud
File this one in the continuously-growing archives of Cap’n Obvious.
Looks like Edmund Kemper
Wow, I don’t think I’ve ever before seen the core defining traits of SJWs condensed into such a pure embodiment. A few things leap out at me about this “woman”:
(1) She looks absolutely miserable. Whatever it is that drives SJWs, the pursuit of happiness certainly isn’t on their list of motivations. They are like ascetics who foresake happiness in this world in exchange for greater glory in the afterlife. Except for SJWs the greater glory is the destruction of their own race. At their core, they are nihilists.
(2) She looks spring-loaded to react hysterically to whatever it is that her thought-masters deem to be the focus of the Two Minutes Hate (the death of a thug in Ferguson, in this case)
(3) The smug intolerance on her face is sickening. She knows everything. She knows that whatever it is she believes in, it is right, and that’s all that matters. The facts of the matter aren’t important- if they disagree with her feelings, they aren’t important. This is the face of a zealot.
(4) It goes without saying, but she looks like a mutant. Like many SJWs, she isn’t content with only having an unpleasant personality.
That’s a man, baby!
I am an atheist. But sometimes I read about white supporters of black racism being beaten at these race rallies by their black “friends.” And then I think there just might be a god after all .
Johnette Lennon…
I might be weing, but doesn’t it look as if her glasses have no prescription? As if wearing them so as to appear smart (sane)?
Just asking.
Fat finger mistake: Meant “wrong” not “weing”.
According to one rather interesting post on Alpha Game from a few years back, women can quite literally be brainwashed by an alpha male if he so chooses.
One effect of pussifying America’s men is that the only possible source of alpha male brainwashing comes from: yup, big media and big government.
Hence, mucho SJW cvnts.
In the words of the Marquis de Sade, the man a woman believes most is the one who is fucking her.
Very bracing conversation. Unfortunately for Trainspotter (whose posts I read on an English blog years ago if it is the same Trainspotter), he’s wrong on his reading. Waldganger is correct in his analysis.
My mistake was thinking these ideas would build on other ideas that were well known. I’m representing ResistingDefamation (dot) org which is focused on fighting about who is doing the naming, labeling, defining, and describing of our white American demographic. (Hint: only we can legitimately name ourselves.) We founded Resisting Defamation in 1989, and we’re all over the Internet. Our motive was to counter the tableaux vivants held out to smear us and our children when we discovered the March on Skokie was headed by a “White Supremacist” who was born a Cohen…he later served a prison sentence for child molestation. But the March on Skokie news & agitprop shocked us into action about all this at the time we realized it was a hoax.
We gave up on the English blog on which Trainspotter or another with that designation posted because it never once linked an idea with an action. We have classes to teach how to attack back, and how to determine whether or not someone’s label for us is degrading. We have four specific projects but I can see that these ideas will have to be presented in bite sizes. But Waldganger got it right.
Trainspotter, you are right about one thing….we keep our focus on only one of the 20 or 30 major problems confronting the white American peoples at this time.
Bo Sears: “Trainspotter, you are right about one thing….we keep our focus on only one of the 20 or 30 major problems confronting the white American peoples at this time.”
Um…I never said any such thing, and have no idea what you are talking about. But thanks, I guess. Glad I was right about one thing!
Bo Sears: “Unfortunately for Trainspotter (whose posts I read on an English blog years ago if it is the same Trainspotter), he’s wrong on his reading. Waldganger is correct in his analysis.”
Perhaps you are wrong in your writing? I can only go by what you post. You clearly linked white supremacism to white separatism, and then linked it further to the nasty SJW mentality. That’s false link after false link, and it’s right there in plain English. This is grossly inaccurate factually, and awful as propaganda – if you are actually on our side. You wrote lines such as “…the old white supremacists having dwindled to a feeble group of white separatists.” This is what a pro-white writes and considers an effective message? Really? You have the gall to call that “resisting defamation”…as you defame us?
Bo Sears: “But the March on Skokie news & agitprop shocked us into action about all this at the time we realized it was a hoax.”
If you are what you say you are, and perhaps you can forgive me for retaining some doubt, then that’s cool beans. I prefer to reserve my fire for the enemy, but an ineffective fellow traveler invites correction as well, so I’ll give a bit of friendly advice. Linking white racial consciousness in the public mind – in any way – to the sick SJW mentality is a ludicrously bad approach, not to mention factually inaccurate. I’m genuinely shocked that this is not obvious to you. Linking separatism and supremacism is at least as destructive. You did both.
Further, you say that you focus on only one thing…yet despite making lengthy posts, it is still not clear what that “one thing” is. How do you resist defamation? By lumping us in with supremacists and SJW’s? Here is a hint, Bo: Clarity is a virtue. People shouldn’t have to break out the chicken entrails to divine your meaning.
Bo Sears: “We gave up on the English blog on which Trainspotter or another with that designation posted because it never once linked an idea with an action.”
If you mean GW’s site, I think it had genuine value and made a real contribution, and I’m proud of my contribution there, however meager. In any event, it’s easy to criticize a blog, but you say that you’ve been around since 1989, “are all over the internet,” and keep your focus on only one problem. Yet…I have no idea what you’re talking about. So how effective is the message?
In contrast, a truly effective propaganda group has been BUGS, which develops a clear message, and makes damn sure the reader knows what the message is – again and again. The result is a literal change in the nature of terminology and discourse. You can call that what you will, but I call it effective.
Bo, a much fuller response of mine has disappeared into filter world, and hopefully it will appear soon, but I’ll say this for now:
You say that you are “resisting defamation.” Yet you defame us by linking us to supremacists and nasty SJW types.
You say that you are “focused on fighting about who is doing the naming, labeling, defining, and describing of our white American demographic,” yet you attach labels to our cause which we reject, and which do us harm in the public mind.
You write lines like this: “She may travel under the flag of social justice but this particular lady in these particular times is one of the new white supremacists, the old white supremacists having dwindled to a feeble group of white separatists.”
This constitutes “resisting defamation?”
Have you not any sense of irony?
Bo, a (hopefully) final word on this matter. I looked up Resisting Defamation, and while I’m not terribly familiar with it, it appears at first glance to be a good group. Further, you appear to be a good guy, assuming you are actually Bo Sears.
I stand by my criticisms of your post, consider it really bad propaganda, and hope that you consider some of the points raised. As we win the intellectual debate, we’re going to run into more and more people who feign agreement with us in part, but then lace the post with anti-white bromides and harmful associations. They are not our friends.
But one lousy post doesn’t negate years of effort, and it appears that you’ve done good work over time, and you should be commended for that. Further, I shouldn’t have been so harsh straight out of the gate, and since you knew I was a “friendly,” you should have clarified matters immediately instead of resorting to snarky comments about reading comprehension. Which is to say, we could have handled it better.
In any event, I don’t particularly enjoy expending time and energy ripping into a fellow traveler. I’ll do it when necessary, but prefer not to. It just doesn’t bring me the same joy as going after an anti-white.
I’ll check back on this thread, but unless something particularly warrants a response, I’ll leave it at that. Good luck in your endeavors.
OTOH, her lipstick is bright red. Her base make-up is thick and skillfully applied. The nose pin… can go either way. There is definitely something here to work with.
Probably the Puritans burning witches looked something like that, as did abolitionists and temperance crusaders centuries later.