An attractive woman emptied her brain bowels online and pinched off a tapered string of sentences so vapid that you would be challenged to find a more inane splatter of poopytalk. From her article at a site called The Daily Love, titled “You do not have to prove yourself to anyone“, in which she tries to prove her point of view to anyone reading, the following nugget is excavated:
As a soul sister to many, I often find myself being called upon for a variety of supporting reasons. Today, I got a phone call from a fellow goddess and she was in absolute disarray. She was, well, a hot mess.
Separately, each of those sentences is empty überfeels nonsense. Together, they create a kind of super storm of silly doublethink (why would a goddess be in disarray?), solipsistic posturing, and infantile prattle.
This is your modern American woman with a cable modem. The internet, among its pantheon of induced pathologies, has had as well the salutary (sadistic?) effect of exposing dim-witted women, and particularly the attractive ones, to criticism and mockery of their forehead furrowing thoughts that they normally would not experience in the real world where people are politer and men more indulgent of non-obese fuckables.
This doesn’t seem to thwart the flow of distaff nonsense, though. Instead of retreating to lick their wounds and go back to doing what they do best — defer to the man of the house — they circle the wagons and soundproof their echo chambers. But the walls come tumbling down eventually. Some of the shivs must penetrate; expect an epidemic of mental illness among our wired women in the coming years.
[…] The Most Vapid Three Sentences In The English Language […]
It irritates me when chicks use the term “hot mess” when not referring to a load of cum.
Made me laugh. 😀
Modern women online aka: The tyranny of solipsism.
The internet is a double-edged sword in this regard. On the one hand, as you say CH, the blubberati and other feelthinkers are exposed to criticism and information they would otherwise not have been confronted with. But on the other hand, it is easier for every sect to carve out its own sphere with like-minded souls, without having to see what they look and act like in real life, which would otherwise often give pause.
I’ll take the good with the bad for now. The spread of information outweighs the bad in our day and age, where there is information that otherwise would not reach inquiring men at all.
By the way: the woman writes that “You do NOT have to prove yourself to anyone” – but she makes sure to use the best possible professional-looking picture of herself, with her hair done and her makeup carefully applied. Hypocrisy, thy name is leftism/woman.
And also when these same women tell others to just ‘be yourself.’ lol
I hate that line. It’s what women say because they don’t know what a man should do. And they are not going to teach a man to “trick” another woman. And even if the girl is a friend and she wouldn’t mind helping you (this never happens, a woman has nothing to gain from setting you up with other women), she doesn’t want to take a risk. If whatever advice she gives you doesn’t work, then she’d be the one you’d blame.
So she’ll stick with “just be yourself” and its sister phrase, “You’ll find someone when you stop looking”, which is feel-good bullshit. (So the less you look, the less you go out there, the more you increase your chances? What’s your research for that? What’s the logic behind it? This is what I asked once. Naturally there was no thought behind her statement. Women just know what they are supposed to say, like pushing the right buttons and wearing the right things.)
I think that phrase came to prominence in the 70s. It was the Alpha guy telling the Beta to let loose and be sociable. But it’s total bullshit today.
and its sister phrase, “You’ll find someone when you stop looking”, which is feel-good bullshit.
My dad once told me that one. But it’s not feel-good BS as much as it is poorly-worded game advice. The idea being that if you’re emotionally invested in finding (= “looking for”) a mate, they’ll be turned off.
“You’ll find someone when you stop looking” means you’ll find someone when you stop chasing men and allow someone to find you. It also indicates that you’ve learned to handle the dating process without becoming clingy, attaching too much expectation to little things, etc. In effect, when you’ve mellowed and aren’t try-hard about it. Of course, you still have to try (sort of- you’re responding instead of initiating though), but something has shifted and now you aren’t seeking, you’re being sought. Its the female version of “aloof alpha.”
I’m betting what I just wrote will not make sense to anyone, lol, but that’s what women mean when they use that expression whether they realize it or not.
“Just be yourself” is actually the bare essence of game. It tells you to be grounded in your own frame regardless of what she does. The problem is that men without the inner understanding of what that means can’t translate it.
The idea being that if you’re emotionally invested in finding (= “looking for”) a mate, they’ll be turned off.
That’s not what the phrase says. It says you’ll find someone when you stop looking.
“Just be yourself” is actually the bare essence of game. It tells you to be grounded in your own frame regardless of what she does. The problem is that men without the inner understanding of what that means can’t translate it.
So I and everyone else who criticize that female-propagated meme would lack “inner understanding”? Your feminine love affair with meaningless phrases that just sound good in your ears is also shown by the fact that you write “inner” understanding. As opposed to what, “outer” understanding? You just mindlessly repeat words. Adding “inner” because women love to talk about “inner” everything. Me me me.
Sorry buddy. What the phrase “Just be yourself” means to be the way you are, do whatever you like right now. Which means to not change. Which means to not improve.
And now is when white knights like you try to “save” the women-loved phrase by adding “Noooo! It means to be your BEST self!” Which isn’t what it says, so you’re lying. Even if the phrase would have actually said “be your best self”, that doesn’t mean anything either, since it says zero, zip nada about what that “best self” would be. Improvement is a big, big topic, and it’s the topic that fills the manosphere. And you claim that you cover ALL OF IT by a phrase telling people to “be yourself”. Fucking idiot.
Let’s apply Logicate’s “inner understanding” bullshit to various parts of life, shall we?
How should you get a good job in the tech sector?
Logicate: “Just be yourself!”
But that doesn’t cover any of the many, many pieces of concrete advice more knowledgeable people would give.
Logicate: “Yes it does! Whatever advice you give, if it’s good I’ll claim that it’s all included in my phrase, so I win!”
How should you set up an exercise program and gain muscle mass?
Logicate: “Just be yourself!”
Uh, this is a whole science.
Logicate: “No it isn’t! My phrase is the ESSENCE of everything anyone could ever say about gaining mass! You just don’t understand how I said it all in one phrase because you don’t have … inner understanding!”
How do you run a city?
Logicate: “Just be yourself!”
So all the science behind city governance that other people discuss is meaningless?
Logicate: “This is the essence! Any concrete advice anyone else gives, if I like it, I’ll claim it’s part of my phrase! Anything bad I’ll claim means you are not being yourself!”
How do you improve game?
Logicate: “Just be yourself!”
So the many hundreds of pieces of concrete advice written by CH, RSD Tyler, Nick Krauser and others are meaningless?
Logicate: “If they work I’ll claim they’re all part of my phrase, so that means I already gave that advice through my phrase! If they don’t work, I’ll claim they mean you’re not being yourself!”
expect an epidemic in coming years? aren’t half the women in this country on Zoloft or some SSRI of some sort?
Note: if you want to pacify a population, make sure that tranquilizers are legal, cheap and plentiful.
16 million are “long-term” users of antidepressants in the U.S., of which 70 percent are women. The use of anti-depressants rose 400 percent in just two decades, a 2011 study found. 11 percent of U.S. adults are now on antidepressants.
The use also rose 234 percent in Britain 1992-2002, where 11 percent of women and 5 percent of men are hooked. 3.5 of all people in France used antidepressants in 2002 – that’s a long time ago, probably a lot more today. In British Columbia, Canada, 7.2 percent of the population were users, a doubling in just eight years. Again, probably a lot more today.
In 2011 a quarter of American women were on anti-depressants. Furthermore when I was in college there, my sense was that most of the girls had some prescription also for anxiety, ADHD, bipolar or other neurosis. So perhaps the total crazy quotient of yank sluts is probably higher.
Who knew?
Could paxil pills be the perfect hamster food?
Add into that hormonal birth control methods, and who knows what damage is being done?
They seem crazier than ever, so it’s obviously money well spent.
A message exchange on OKC.
Me :
How would you retort to someone on a blog thread that has no respect for the joke you made, and finally says :
“Stick with what you know. Nothing”
This really happened to me, and I did manage to make a good retort; the person never responded to it.
So why am I writing this to you ?
To see if you are really as interesting as your profile hints at.
Her :
Ha-ha, well that is a very unique opening line! Not one I’ve heard before
So I’m curious, what did you tell them?
Me :
“Nothing with what you know, sticks.”
Here is another :
“Where have you been all my life ?”
“Hiding from you.”
How does one retort to that hmmmmmmmm ?
It’s so obvious you know.
Her :
Ha-ha, no I don’t know. I have no idea.
Me :
… then you’ll just have to start looking … and move your arse luv … oh I’m sorry … then move your badinkadink … eh ? … then move your ‘dairy air’ … now now luv … hang on … hang on luv … I’ve got it !!!!
Move your money makers !!!!
*Sigh*
Rambunctulicious meritorious uproarious little globules ?
*Sigh*
What about gay-men’s-regrets ?
Thank you.
Now move your arse.
: )
Her :
You are a weird one, huh? ; )
Me :
I am genuinely curious on why you said that. Tell me more ; )
Her :
You just have a unique way about you.
*****************************************************************************
Does this mean I can ask her out for coffee now ??????
No. Ask her out for tranquilizers.
Ahh, just kidding. Why aren’t you out with her already?
Seems like an okay conversation. Just remember to keep it short, don’t let her drag you into a prolonged online exchange.
http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20131111170538/creepypasta/images/9/92/Wtf-did-i-just-read.jpg
Mastah,
I eez vewwy sorries, next time I comparers her booties with War Correspondence of General Strumpfernickel to cook of opposing general at glorious battle Snackfenhausen.
Now don’t ya worries, I tell her I learn everytinks from you, if she goes yarra-yarra-die-you-mothafucka.
Neg or die baby !!!!!!
uhhh
she really wants some dick to put up with that loool
My thoughts exactly. I would’ve been out after the first text.
sure
Why Amy ?
… is that a smile ???? Hmmmmm
It sounds try-hard, too chatty, and weird.
My apologies, so it’s not your smile then. Good golly what could it be ? Hmmmm … lemme guess …. hmmmmm … and it sounds try-hard, too chatty, and weird … Amy, my deary darling, have you been experimenting with laxatives then ?
I agree with Amy, as I often do… not so much to white knight (although I like the sound of that)… more to slap down you young metros and your inane texting… most unmanly, and not the least bit droll.
And whoever doesn’t like me saying it can come see me outside.
And whoever doesn’t like me saying it can come see me outside.
Good … now stay there.
I feel roundly chastised. :duckface:
I’d ask her to Starbucks for a coffee date. Let her order first. Bend her over the counter and go for the anal sex close right then. Women want a strong confident man who’s not afraid to leave the house in a jockstrap and jackboots every morning. Introduce yourself by beating your chest like Tarzan and screaming.
lol well done
Oh man, I read this comment three times, with a few minutes in between each reading to deal with MY UNCONTROLLABLE LAUGHTER!!! Applause…
That was impressive Lars, so how would you answer when OKC asks you whether you’ll give analingus to a woman ?
I said yes (you never deny a woman analingus you know), and wrote in the comment box beneath it :
… but that bum-hole had better be clean, because if it’s not, then a flute is going up that bum, and I am going to diddle-daddle your girly parts until that bum-flute plays ‘Yankee Doodle’ for me.
Lars, you are a treasure.
Is that you “EuInshiva”?
“Introduce yourself by beating your chest like Tarzan and screaming.”
The good old Arnie gambit. Love it. 😆
You go for the brainy, intellectual types, I see.
Have a ball, but you’re hosed if your texting seductiveness presents 20 words to every (trite) *one* that she thumbs into her phone while stumbling down the sidewalk, mowing down children and the elderly.
BuenaVista,
One must either consider the madness of a set of convictions, or embroider the convictions of one’s madness … as such … in this match of wits … that trade of fatal words … the reality is a sophistry that hinges on the effrontery of bearing a torch lighting one’s torments … or fearing the torments of bearing the torch … we yearn … and we must groan … slaves to a wicked palindrome.
Reminds me of a line about Cassanovas that plow more beaver than a drunken riverboat captain.
… that plow more beaver than a drunken riverboat captain.
Waaaaaaa !!!!!!
Bix n00d gaym fo’lyfe.
I like you.
Loser.
User.
The crazy thing is she doesn’t even get the second irony of a fellow godess having to use a telephone to speak to her.
In the famous words of Alpha James T Kirk
“What does God need with a spaceship?”
“infantile prattle.”
A more unequaled description of our current multiculturalism and PC speak escapes me. Basically describes the entire DNC.
Definitely an accurate attribute all women possess. :p
I object to goddesses being referred to as fellows. lol
“KNOWING that you are irreplaceable, invaluable, unparalleled, and a COMPLETE package on your OWN will illuminate your brightest light and NO ONE worthwhile can resist a bright, shining and magnetic GODDESS”
Oh, dear God! This surely is the height of hubris! specially for a woman. If I started believing this, it would transform me into an egotistical, ungrateful, self-centered and entitled woman. More importantly, my Swami would pull my hair and give me a tight slap on my tush and ask me to wake up. Maybe, just maybe things would have turned out different, if this friend of hers had shown her boyfriend that he was “irreplaceable, invaluable, unparalleled and a complete package and let his light shine through”
Yeah, I know. that is “so anachronistic and anti-women”. Sigh!
“As a soul sister to many, I often find myself being called upon for a variety of supporting reasons.”
This could make a good running joke, just replace “soul sister” with some ridiculous title and BLAM instant comedy.
As a gay black Jew, I often find myself being called upon for a variety of supporting reasons.
And the award for best supporting reason goes to…
Those three sentences are the most try-hard shit I ever read. The actual article flows like a corny soap opera.
Modern Americans have such disorganized thought processes. Yes thank the pc police and “generation feels” of the internet along with the “apology culture” for that.
If you simply believe that fundamental truths exist, you have a systematic way to convey those truths, and you believe that men and women are biolically different; you are counterculture.
Biologically
remember guys: Jenna Phillips is a Total Wellness Philosopher, Certified Holistic Lifestyle Coach, AFAA Certified Personal Trainer & the founder of her lifestyle brand I’m On A Mission. WTF.
I love heartiste, and the manosphere, but this is a symptom of the internet and our internet economy. None of things includes: builder of bridges, or mother of children. the idea that it is better and more high status to be a blogger than an electrician is what is destroying America, sitting around talking are feminine virtues, not the masculine civilization building ones.
Self-described “goddesses” are always in disarray, at best. More often they’re outright basket cases. That’s why they need the prescription-strength hamster stimulant of calling themselves goddesses.
Often saddled, never settled. Such is the fate of the neurotic self-esteem generation woman.
+1 on COTW. Often saddled, never settled.
You are too kind, sir.
And the ones who believe in reincarnation were ALWAYS Joan of Arc, Cleopatra or some woo-woo Indian princess in a former life… never some kitchen wench or squaw.
When I hear any woman self-refer as a goddess, I leave a Skinner-shaped hole in the wall, I’m out of there so fast. Last one who did so transpired to be a wall-beaten, cabernet-addled poet slammer. Poor dear seemed genuinely baffled why neither the hot young intellectual dude, the suave though balding captain of finance nor my good self were interested in helping to fund her negative equity goddess hovel in return for access to her carousel coochie.
Bitch later turned up at a social event I was expected to attend but didn’t and started telling people I’d promised to marry her. Her goddess-grade hamster was obviously spinning so fast that she’d even begun believing her own bean-flick fantasies. Funny how these self-contained, self-obsessed, “self-sufficient” goddesses always seem to have the love/cheque book of a good man top of their want list.
tl;dr version:
Her friend got pumped & dumped by an alpha. Columnist’s advice is ‘you are fabulous’ and it’s ‘the man’s fault’ for not realising ‘how wonderful she is’ or something, I couldn’t read any more after that point.
Dear God. Do people actually get paid for writing this shite?
tl;dr version:
Her friend got pumped & dumped by an alpha……
tl;dr
The comments are a great read, various other women who have all been P&D’d say they ‘won’t settle for anything less than true love’ next time etc. I wonder do they realise that in order to find it they will have to significantly lower their standards. More likely is they will continue to chase alphas for commitment until the wall looms.
They are and I am reading them that was just a joke about something you hear often enough.
“You get to let him go so he can have the opportunity to miss you.”
They actually believe this? When a man dumps a woman he never misses her. When a woman is dumped she will miss the dumpee eternally OR if she dumps a man and she find out through word of mouth, social media, etc that his life is awesome and he’s shown to be improving…she’ll hit him up around her 28th bday.
“I spent time with her on this because I used to go after UNAVAILABLE men ALL. THE. TIME. I did it because I had something to prove to myself and everyone else around me. I figured that getting the unattainable man meant this: “I AM AN INCREDIBLE WOMAN!”
Well then, why would a girl who is “amazing, perfect, dedicated, loving, beautiful, and a GODDESS” have poor mate selection?
The hamstering in her is off the charts
“When you know your worth, you won’t settle for anything that isn’t in alignment with your heart’s innermost desires. Standing FIRM for what you believe in will allow what you’ve always wanted to flow to you. (Tweet-worthy!) KNOWING that you are irreplaceable, invaluable, unparalleled, and a COMPLETE package on your OWN will illuminate your brightest light and NO ONE worthwhile can resist a bright, shining and magnetic GODDESS (or MAN).”
That sums it up…there are goddesses and there are men. Bitch is a lost cause. She’s on the fast track to spinsterhood
48 year old never-marrieds with ex-boyfriend lists a mile long will still insist it was every one of those “fools” that had issues
“They actually believe this? When a man dumps a woman he never misses her.”
Well, you’d be surprised.
Her writing is annoying, but this is kinda how girls talk. And I’ll risk being flamed to point out that her advice is generally right (don’t overinvest in men who won’t commit, but if you are getting dumped all the time, look at yourself bc the common denominator is you). It’s just incomplete, because she assumes the girl’s only “mistake” is going after unavailable guys, when it just as easily could be that the guy is in fact available, but to a “better” girl.
Oprahfication of the nation, just part of the on-going legacies of the Atlantic-Slave trade.
Amy, I have a few questions in regards to this article:
1. I don’t understand why the the author can’t seem to be able to admit that she seems to have relied on magical thinking in which history would not repeat itself and the next time would be the one which lead to the happy ending? What causes women to think that the outcome will be different if the variables are changed?
2. Does an article like this reinforce rationalization (it’s not my fault) or do women actually consider this helpful? Is it helpful to you?
3. Do you think the author of this article would even be open to hearing and posting a man’s perspective or insight on the subject?
Damn, man… yet another drollery. Kid’s on fire.
I’m a fat wimpy betaschlub, so it took ‘er 40th birthday for that to happen. I’m ashamed to say that it disturbed me some. Fortunately (thanks redpill) not much.
In a way, didn’t Elliot Rodgers think of himself this way? ‘I am a god, why can’t women/girls see this?’ ‘They should be flocking to me I’m so awesome.’
Perhaps it’s just me, but I see a very similar pattern in the thought process of the goddess trip.
except ER didn’t have beautiful tits and ass
Neither do 85% of the women reading the site in question, I’d wager.
a beautiful womani is gonna post an avi
Rollo actually sort of talked about that in “Separating Values”. Your personal value doesn’t necessarily translate to your SMV.
Her message, inanely expressed, is that women shouldn’t let the actions of others (men) affect their sense of self-worth. Which is the advice given to men here all the time (develop inner game).
[CH: not quite. if a man is failing with women he has to take stock of himself and see where he’s going wrong, and then take steps to fix the problem. inner game refers to how a man should act around women he wants to fuck. don’t conflate the two dynamics.]
Great advice for men, but women are basically wired to do that… to judge ourselves by how others see us. It’s normal and it doesn’t have to be a bad thing, if we’re seeking validation from the right people and not overdoing it.
I think she’s wired to write (and publicize!) the statement:
“I often find myself being called upon for a variety of supporting reasons” when what her addled mind wishes to say is:
“I often find myself being called upon to support the sister-goddesses for a variety of reasons.”
Which means she too stupid to carry on an adult conversation, much less at breakfast, even if the subject is herself.
When has CH ever given advice equivalent to “reject empiricism, and supplant it with a neurotic mysticism?”
Amy, I agree, but there needs to be some self-reflection that goes on as well. Perhaps not right away (most women aren’t hardwired nor socialized to manage that) but certainly at some point.
Phrases like “he doesn’t deserve you” and their ilk do not encourage this very critical and important behavior.
Different scenarios, not insignificant in that Rodgers was a dude. Such conceits as the goddess fiction can by perpetuated into perpetuity by the casual pump and dump, constant beta orbiter compliments, and cynical encouragement from the sisterhood. Blissful ignorance is an option. An incel is not afforded the same delusions, and must come to terms with reality. Adapt or perish; those were the harsh options for young Elliot.
This… and stated in as succinct a fashion as can be expected.
Well-done.
She’s easily 30 lbs overweight. I saw her pics. In the first, she uses a flattering headshot. The second a full body shot in a skirt. Plus, she looks like some sort of mongrel. Presently a 27 yr old cat lady who rants about the 60 dates in 6 weeks she recently had. meh.
Incorrect, at least if google is any indication. She’s also into fitness, unless she’s had a recent lapse:
http://www.erinhuggins.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/jennaarms.jpg
She has Type I Diabetes, according to her fitness tape bio, and was in a bad car wreck 14 years ago and had a brain injury. (that’s much better on the resume than most bloggerati cat-companions):http://www.pinkmethod.com/pink-team/
Someone should be putting a baby in that oven. Let her do the fitness thing on the side. But any talk of goddesses is strictly verboten. Maybe she’s just overly positive about herself because of overcoming that injury and diabetes.
Or hell, maybe this is just evidence that even a deadly accident, long recovery and serious illness cannot impart to women the various forms of betterment, subtle and gross, to character, maturity, gravity, and intellect that we’d expect from men in similar circumstances.
I’m not seeing the same meh pic in my online search. She was smokin if she’s not now. Based on her article, she knows what it is to be a dingy hot babe left to her own instincts.
Capitalizing RANDOM words in a SENTENCE for EFFECT does not make those WORDS any more PROFOUND or IMPORTANT than they otherwise ARE. But it MAKES hamsters FEEL good about THEMSELVES…
lol
ANAL CUNT
damn thrust, you never told me you were Anal Cunt-aware!
my fav song titles:
“I Went Back in Time and Voted for Hitler”
“Hitler Was A Sensitive Man”
“You Were Too Ugly to Rape, So I Just Beat the Shit Out of You”
“If You Don’t Like the Village People, You’re Fucking Gay”
“Ha Ha Holocaust”
“I Got an Office Job for the Sole Purpose of Sexually Harassing Women”
And the grand winner…”I’m Really Excited About the Upcoming David Buskin Concert”
I could eat a bowl of Alphabet soup and crap a more redolent three sentences.
Sigh.
There is only one G-d. There are no goddesses. There aren’t even any princesses, which is what this female writer appears to confuse as goddesses.
Oh, and blasphemy? Not a turn on, babe. Not at all.
And lest we forget, only one G-dzilla.
There goes Tokyo … but let bygones by bygones, no, Massa Eliot?
.
When God will allow crackie to receive what’s coming to him … The schadenfreude…
Thanks for a taste of things to come, Gro. :duckface:
There is only one G-d.
Not a single piece of proof for that in thousands of years, so shut the fuck up. And why do you write “G-d” like a jewboy?
And even if there was a “god”, and “only one god” which you have no way of knowing, then nothing says your religious fantasies would have anything to do with that supernatural creature. You religionuts have hundreds of contradictory versions even of the same religion, proving that none of you know what you are talking about. You all just make up fantasies that suit you but that contradict the fantasies of your co-religionists.
Dude, do you even lift?
Oops, wrong meme.
Ah, here it is:
You mad, brah?
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
Manjaw
I can’t resist a cheap shot…
It seems the Internet is the unisex validator.
Before the greatest insult was telling someone they should buy a dog so they can have at least one friend but now it’s the Internet.
It has brought porn and role playing games to Omega males afraid to leave the house and their corollary loser, women who can go to Facebook for ego strokes and read/write blogs about how they are too good for any man alive (but not some far off movie star they will conveniently never meet.)
CH once wrote to the effect, “Anyone who says ‘I don’t have to prove myself to you or anyone’ is a complete loser b/c the idea that ‘I only have to please myself; meet my own standards etc’ is clutching the last straw salve every homeless loser can afford.”
I read that and felt vindicated. It seems the farther down the Loser Chart a person is the quicker they pull out the “I-don’t-have-to-prove-myself-to-you” defense. And in my life I have heard women and failure-men spout it. At first it sounds reasonable but if we reflect on it the lunacy is obvious; if you are the only friend you have then you are indeed a loser/wasted life who needs self-improvement.
Off topic? I think not…..
http://www.wjla.com/articles/2014/07/disabled-models-a-staple-of-nordstrom-catalogs-105142.html
Somewhere in the article it says these models are a good fit for the brand. I seriously doubt this would work for Victoria’s Secret models…
One the one hand, the comments you guys left at thedailylove are funny, but then you are engaging women in a conversation they can never understand.
A better rationalization of the wall without calling it the wall I have never heard. Basically, she is not going to chase after the first prize UNAVAILABLE man, but mean the new her, same as the old her:
“When you know your worth, you won’t settle for anything that isn’t in alignment with your heart’s innermost desires.”
Apparently, a herd of cats is not settling vis-a-vis her heart’s innermost desires. The riddle of an experienced multi-man woman has no actual solution. At least these bitches by their very nature die by the same sword they used to kill my hopes and dreams. A woman’s love is the biggest lie told on earth. I try to laugh, but the wake of broken lives is pretty sad. Only vengeance could make me laugh hardily.
I tell you fixing the unfixable experienced woman, or arguing with her, is fucking pointless. It is dispatching the Zadokian money priests that created the Abrahamic religions and the current worship of government that will fix anything. I wish I could reach your hearts on that point, men. Don’t steel your heart for women. They are vapid, insubstantial, not relevant to mission or a man’s identity. So what else is in this prison you cannot see, smell, or taste?
Love your writing style.