If you live in a metropolitan region where there’s a nontrivial per capita population of homeless, and you see the same street bums lounging on the same spots of sidewalk on your daily constitutional, you can run what I call Homeless Helper Game.
The concept is simple. Buy your lunch and a little extra, like a pastry. Under pretense of charity, and in full view of some passing cuties, kneel down in front of the bum and hand him the pastry, saying “you look like you could use a bite”. Act like you think no one is watching you (that means no glancing around for approval, unless you can conceal it really well).
The homeless guy of course will be elated. The girls will be wet. No girl, no matter how cynical or corporately manjawed, can resist this display of alpha male generosity. Why alpha male? Because providing charity is alpha; receiving charity is beta, veering into omega territory.
The trick is to spin your insta-DHV into a conversation with one of the passing cuties. Occasionally, a girl will approach you to say she noticed and thought it was a great thing you did. Reply with a faux humble “I didn’t think anyone saw that. Now I’m kind of embarrassed.”
Otherwise, you’ll have to situate yourself near a girl you know witnessed your act of charity, say at a bus stop or pedestrian crossing, and make a show of crumpling up the paper from which you withdrew the pastry you gave to the bum. If she’s at all intrigued, that will be enough to get her talking.
This isn’t a high volume game tactic. There are way more efficient ways to meet women. But it’s a fun addition to your seduction skillset and a great way to spice up an otherwise ordinary stroll. Oh yeah, and you fed a homeless guy, which is better than giving him cash money which will inevitably be spent on liquor.
[…] Homeless Helper Game […]
lzoozzoolz
dis is what da GBFM Doesz!!!
If you live in a metropolitan region where there’s a nontrivial per capita population of homeless, and you see the same street bums lounging on the same spots of sidewalk on your daily constitutional, you can run what I call Homeless Helper Game.
The concept is simple. Go on a date and a little extra, like a girl with a big ass. Under pretense of charity, and in full view of some passing cuties, kneel down in front of the bum and hand him the girl’s ass, saying “you look like you could use a bite”. Act like you think no one is watching you (that means no glancing around for approval, unless you can conceal it really well).
The homeless guy of course will be elated. The girls will be wet. No girl, no matter how cynical or corporately manjawed, can resist this display of alpha male generosity sharing his pusysysysysys. Why alpha male? Because providing charity is alpha; receiving charity is beta, veering into omega territory.
The trick is to spin your insta-DHV into a conversation with one of the passing cuties. Occasionally, a girl will approach you to say she noticed and thought it was a great thing you did. Reply with a faux humble “I didn’t think anyone saw that. Now I’m kind of embarrassed. Can I watch you masturbate and we’ll call it even?”
lzlozololzolzlozloz
Genius.
I can’t imagine anyone ever actually doing this, but the thought brings joy to my heart.
Charity? Fuck that.
Buy your lunch and a little extra, like a bottle of Glenlivet. Under pretense of charity, and in full view of some passing cuties, kneel down in front of the bum and hand him the bottle, saying “you look like you could use a drink.”
There. Fixed it.
“Because providing charity is alpha; receiving charity is beta, veering into omega territory.”
where does lefty confiscation-by-force-then-taking-credit-for-payouts fit in to the charity spectrum?
[CH: machiavellian.]
you could also transition with “oh god i didn’t know anyone was behind me, was my butt hanging out?” and if she’s playful continue with the accusation that she was indeed staring at your ass and go sexual fast.
[speed insinuation.]
NO NO NO, RATE HATE AND WORSHIPPING THE .0001% we fantasize we are part of are all that is allowed here.
I gave a sandwich to this dirty smelly scarey looking broken down black bum on the street,as a beautiful 20 year old white nymphet beautifully dressed,just happened to be walking by,and I’ll never forget her reaction: “Aw thast so sweet you gave a snadwich to my boyfriend Shontavious!”
Rontavius Wafflehouse the Third
i mean “race hate” by the resident visionary genius fans of mustache boy.
Meir Henoch Mojszewicz Wallach-Finkelstein:
“WELL, THERE IS NO FAMINE.”
http://www.garethjones.org/published_articles/st_patricks/litvinov_famine_denia_oldl.htm
This is a good post. If only because it shows that some classic ‘positive’ traits can be high value.
—
side note; so things are going good with these so-called hot, wild chicks. but my strategy of just kinda sticking straight to the classic 16 and remaining ‘mysterious’ (no straight answers about my past, detached unimpressed ‘wow’s when they mention stuff from theirs) is leading to strange results. Confession of love (hey it happens, and I have yet to say it back)….I’m holding off on any commitment by just saying that relationships are a lot of work.
So annnyway, you have this and then she wants to start veering into these weird conversations….like ‘you don’t think I’m a slut, do you?’ my response just a raised eyebrow (like wtf is this conversation)….’because i think you’re kind of slutty.’ silence, me nodding as if to say ‘cool story.’
So it’s this double press of her trying to smoke out if I’m banging other girls, while her offering that she’s faithful to me and simultaneously for some reason NOW needing me to not think she’s a slut. I mean, I don’t care about her past, but I’m not a liar lol….and I just assume that whatever she’s volunteered trying to impress me is like the tip of the iceberg.
What’s happening CH?
Why would a hot chick try to shit test you/impress you with her adventurous sexual history, then when you remain unphased in the face of everything, suddenly want to come across as chaste (or be perceived as chaste)….
1. a girl who thinks you’re a player with experience, and who is attracted to you, will try to impress with tales of her adventurous tail, under the assumption that that’s what you want from her. girls who do this aren’t playing a long game, suffice to say.
2. if she really likes you, and enough time has passed, she’ll cop a chaste pose to lock you into promises of commitment. she subconsciously knows that men value chasteness in a relationship.
3. beyond the above two explanations, she could just be a crazy drama whore.
It hasn’t even been two months. For fuck’s sake. Lol chicks, logic not even once. I could understand her trying to do this if she hadn’t already volunteered the earlier information, but this is like watching someone trying to unring a bell. *takes notes*
I’ve seen her twice a week for the last month tho….that’s probably the problem.
you ever taken this bait?
What are you looking for?
good question
“I’ve seen her twice a week for the last month tho….that’s probably the problem.”
That’s a good guess.
Are these crazy chicks white girls, or are they chimpanzee-ettes?
[Honestly, I’m not sure that I want to know the answer, but what the hell, I’m a big boy, and I can deal with the troof.]
they are white.
Gee it’s almost like that those rules that YaReally guy keeps repeating about not seeing a girl more than once every week or two or she’ll fall in love are legit rules based on field experience. WHO KNEW lol
@Scray
You created this situation. She’s in love with you now and wants you to see her as commitment material. Soon she’s going to give you the Ultimatum and tell you she can’t hook up with you anymore if you don’t want to be her boyfriend because it hurts too much.
Then you will either not bend and lose her, lie because of scarcity and lead her on to keep getting the validation of her sex, or treat her like shit and start doing long-term emotional damage to her which is funny at first but will fuck her up for future relationships.
Next time follow the rules.
It’s kind of depressing how easy it is.
Third time’s the charm tho. I’ll let this one down easy.
Easy killer. I said your rules work to DELAY the inevitable, not prevent it. Even if you’re seeing her once a week, she’ll still get attached to you. It’s in our nature. We’ll bond to anyone we’re having sex with on regular basis.
Yes, Zombie Brain, big boy with “boy” being the operative word. And since you’re apparently big on race hate and the implicit idea of higher achievement, perhaps you’ll share some of what make it worth it for the rest of us to clothe and feed you? What are you, a diesel mechanic, a dry cleaner operator, every limited intellect can still contribute–even a rotten one like yours.
Maybe you even invented something great, like Jew Jonas Salk, the reason you and your relatives don’t have Polio. Very few people of any race can ache dive indisputable greatness like that, but maybe you’ve contributed something that gets you Narrow Asshole Excuse points.
Please do tell!
I expect a resounding silence about your positive contributions to the hive, and more derogatory shit about others.
“We all love looking down”
–Morcheeba, “It’s All Part of The Process”
Doing long-term emotional damage … which is funny at first. Seriously?
@Amy
No shit, that’s the same thing I’ve said a thousand times. Here’s me quoting myself from various posts I’ve made because apparently the stuff about blondes not being too bright is true:
“Basically every casual relationship hits the “Ultimatum Point” down the road, where she withholds sex for commitment because she’s gotten attached to you…usually this is the end of the relationship if you won’t commit. Sometimes this happens in a few weeks, sometimes it’s in a few months, but it’s there. You can delay it by not seeing her once a week, disqualifying yourself as a Provider, etc. which is what I do…but you did the opposite and sped it up lol”
“Eventually she catches feelings and delivers The Ultimatum (“I can’t do this anymore if we aren’t going to be in a real relationship, it hurts too much because I like you :(“) and you either lose her or date her as an LTR. You can stall The Ultimatum by following rules like not seeing her more than once every week or two, not doing relationshippy shit, etc.”
Here’s a nice big long one for ya:
“And the main thing I’ve found with casual fuckbuddy relationships is that it’s basically like a roll of toilet paper lol At the end of that roll is “the Ultimatum” where she’s attached to you and the pain of not being in an actual boyfriend/girlfriend relationship with you outweighs the pleasure of you two hooking up and she has to force you into the “Either we’re BF/GF or I can’t see you anymore” Ultimatum.
Now the stuff I list up above takes, say, one square of toilet paper at a time off the roll. But when you, say, invite her over and make her dinner and watch a movie together, even if it’s followed by epic sex, you’ve just yanked that roll of toilet paper and like 5 or 6 sheets came off. If you pull back to just sex stuff, that’s cool, you’re back to just one paper at a time, but the damage has been done in terms of the length of the roll. If you yank a handful of sheets at a time too frequently, the stuff up above starts being 2 or 3 sheets at a time instead of just one because you’ve fucked with the casual dynamic too much.
There are anomalies of course, like some girls are extra large rolls of paper. And you can reset the roll in certain circumstances. And some things you do will yank more paper off than others, but basically the thing to keep in mind is that you can’t go backward and put paper back ON the roll, so understand that every action you take is bringing you closer to the end of the roll and The Ultimatum.”
Here’s some more research you can do:
http://yareallyarchive.com/search/?q=%22her+more+than+once%22
Weird, it’s almost like you don’t actually pay attention to things before you argue them. But please, do tell us more about how women work. We’re all in the dark here about your mysterious gender and desperately need your perspective along with pics of your tits to jack off to.
“Doing long-term emotional damage … which is funny at first. Seriously?”
Funny in the sense of new guys enjoying the initial power-trip of having a girl legitimately freaking out chasing them because it’s something they’ve never experienced before and they get a high off it. But that wears off when it becomes serious and they realize they’re doing long-term damage that they didn’t mean to do.
Lol, thanks for the exegesis but it has nothing to do with the fact that your fundamental premise of “I leave them better than I found them” is complete BS. You leave them when they’re at least partially attached to you. Breaking attachments hurts. Sure, the pain heals but a girl who goes through this enough times gets HARDENED and less open to bonding to the next guy. Do you understand yet?
I said before, I am not blaming you as long as you’re honest with the girls, they have free will and the ability to avoid making mistakes. But you going on and on about what a life-expanding experience it is for these girls to be used up by you like toilet paper and that they’re all “better” than before is, to put it mildly, an unadulterated steaming pile of crap.
@YaReally
How’s the more masculine/instinct/low-energy game working out for you. I watched Drive again last night – I want Ryan Gosling’s character to seep into my subconscious.
Pregnant pauses. Eye contact for days. Being Ice. Limited as fuck verbiage.
I used it on my ex before/during/ and kinda after we fucked this past weekend. For me, I enjoy it. Though I found myself slipping back into my old frame when I’m not constantly on the ball.
to subway masturbator:I am beginning to think you really ARE a subway masturbator! You think Jonas Salk ever banged an HB 10??
Note:Amy you are OK by me! Good standing up to YR. Now, Ya Really,what if the girl is much (i mean much )younget than you and she sees you as a just a fling,she’s not going to get attached right? Are you in the clear??
‘But that wears off when it becomes serious and they realize they’re doing long-term damage that they didn’t mean to do.’
I just assumed that because they’re ‘wild’ girls they’d be different somehow. Wrong. And yeah…at first it’s kind of cool. I think I’m pretty much at the point where I don’t want to make a mess.
You never got disillusioned, tho?
‘and she sees you as a just a fling,
Is this possible? I hear about this all the time….like girls seeing guys as just a fling. I guess it is if the girl doesn’t see the guy for more than once a week, but even then it still just seems to slow it down. What are these situations where a girl is fucking a guy but supposedly never gets attached?
Shit damn, Kim du Toit, I didn’t say jack about jewesses*.
I was axing about white girls -vs- chimpanzee-ettes.
[*Shhh….. Deep Dark Zombie Secret SPOILER ALERT here: I don’t need to ax about the jewesses, because they’re my specialty. Them arrogant stuck-up haughty little cunts are like fucking silly putty in the Zombie’s hands. MOO HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!! Eat it, K du T, eat it.]
@Amy
“You leave them when they’re at least partially attached to you. Breaking attachments hurts”
Your problem is that, like most women, you think “feeling bad” is something women should be excused from in life. You are literally saying the equivalent of “well schools shouldn’t keep score when they play sports in gym class because some of the kids will lose and feel bad and sure they’ll get over it but CLEARLY it does long-term damage and hardens them to the world”
But keep swingin’! I’m sure someone’ll high-five you for standing up to the big mean bully YaReally who’s being a jerk pointing out your retarded logic.
@thrust
“How’s the more masculine/instinct/low-energy game working out for you”
Big fan of it. I’m not as low energy as the Drive guy (which is a great movie for body-language and eye-contact and pregnant pauses and shit) because I like to spit a lot of verbals, but I’ve toned things down a lot compared to a few years ago and I drop a lot closer to Drive when I’m in actual isolation and looking to escalate things sexually.
So I’m using it more in addition to my normal game rather than completely replacing my normal game, because when I’m cold-approaching I come in with energy and then just ramp things downward once I’m in set…I’ve found that the Drive stuff won’t get me shit in a bar where there are a lot of distractions for the girls because then I’m just a quiet guy standing around (if you’re super good looking you could get away with that and get some girls approaching you), so I bring it out once I’m in set and past the hook point.
But it’s great in situations where the girl is forced to interact with you, like partying with a social circle where a mixed group of you are going out, or waitresses who have to come to your table, and especially strippers who tend to sit down with you and basically put themselves in isolation at your table for a few minutes before they pitch you a dance. It’s also great with fuckbuddies, but anything goes with them lol
Either way tho, the effect is ridiculous. I can’t even think of what I used to look at instead of lasering the girls in the eye lol Like how the fuck did I even pickup??
@OralCummings
Depends on the girl. I’ve found there are very girl girls who legitimately won’t get attached, they usually have specific personality types and are in specific life situations where they very aggressively are not looking or open to anything serious. A lot of young chicks will say they don’t want anything serious but are just saying that because they think you want to hear it and they get attached just like the others.
@Scray
“I just assumed that because they’re ‘wild’ girls they’d be different somehow. Wrong.”
Nope lol Madonna/whore complex. They’re all the same, the good and the bad.
“at first it’s kind of cool. I think I’m pretty much at the point where I don’t want to make a mess.”
That’s how it works lol You can be warned about the damage you can cause, but once you see it first-hand and fuck up a girl that you legitimately cared about, you go “oh wow, Spider-Man was right, with great power comes great responsibility” and learn your lesson and try to do good from there.
“You never got disillusioned, tho?”
At what, specifically?
“What are these situations where a girl is fucking a guy but supposedly never gets attached?”
It involves a lot of factors, including her own particular personality. But a lot of common factors boil down to the girl fully convincing herself that it would not be a good idea for her to fall for you (or any dude in general), like to where SHE’S the one not wanting to see you more than every couple weeks and not wanting to txt you every day and not wanting to have gay movie night dates where you don’t bang etc. So usually they’ll be girls who work a shitload or are in good/benefitial relationships already, or a combo of the two. They’re not necessarily high testosterone women, they’re just women who have cut off that “I’m open to getting attached” part of their brain and stick to that.
Most girls are open to being attracted to new guys, even girls in relationshpis and shit…their boyfriend is a Nice Guy and good provider but if the right guy came along they’d swing to that branch. But some girls have decided “this part of my life is perfect as-is and I don’t want to fuck it up so I’m not going to do things that will run the risk of me falling for this guy, so I’m going to view this as just fun on the side and nothing else”.
I’d say this is like, 10% of girls. Probably 60% these days say they don’t want a relationship but fall in love and Ultimatum you anyway, 20% admit they’d like a relationship and will try to convince you to enter one with them as they get attached, and the last 10% adamantly won’t put out unless you agree to a relationship.
@Amy, I think I recall YaReally saying that the ‘leaving them better than you got them’ is fantasy. Regardless, I don’t even see the need for a reason to justify actions that might harm the feelings of others. Last time I checked, you are adults with equal rights and I see no reason why men should offer more sympathy to women than women offer to men. Living with the consequences of ones actions is what adults do. If women are bored of being adults, you can give up your rights and go back to the kitchen.
The biggest reason why one shouldn’t damage the girls they see very badly is because you will avoid a lot of drama by not doing it.
So you’ve got mudsharks falling “in love” with you?
Honestly, if you want to get a completely accurate appraisal of your sitation, then you should start with the assumption that these poor kookettes are very badly mentally ill, and move forward from there.
Think of yourself as an evil psychiatrist who is molesting his most psychologically unstable patients.
BTW, what’s your end goal in all of this – to lessen the melanin content of your progeny?
Because it’s not exactly like we have an urgent need for any more Philip Chisms in this world…
‘Honestly, if you want to get a completely accurate appraisal of your sitation, then you should start with the assumption that these poor kookettes are very badly mentally ill, and move forward from there.’
How about I don’t and you’re a fucking idiot.
‘At what, specifically?’
At how cookie-cutter ‘love’ is, mainly.
> “How about I don’t…”
Dude, you can do what the fuck ever you want to do.
You can believe that the moon is made of cheese and then howl at it every night because it’s so far away from you that you can’t get your incisors on it – which just ain’t fair!!!
It won’t make a damn bit of difference to me [except for the fact that you vote and that you get fiat currency deposited onto your EBT card each month, not to mention all of the free minutes on your ObamaPhone].
But if you have any actual intellectual curiosity here [which, yeah, I know, is exceedingly rare in chimpanzees, but work with me here], and if you truly want to understand what you are dealing with, then understand it to be:
YOU – Evil Psychiatrist Who Molests His Patients
SHE – The Most Psychologically Unstable Nymphomaniac Patient In Your “Care”
Then it will all start to make sense.
‘Then it will all start to make sense.’
No it won’t. As it stands right now, you’re just another guy who’s going to get lied to. What you’re presenting here is just a different version of the ‘game only works on dumb bar sloots.’ Instead tho, it’s ‘a non-white person using game can only pick up dumb ‘mentally ill’ white sloots.’ It’s just dumb.
“Your problem is that, like most women, you think “feeling bad” is something women should be excused from in life. You are literally saying the equivalent of “well schools shouldn’t keep score when they play sports in gym class because some of the kids will lose and feel bad and sure they’ll get over it but CLEARLY it does long-term damage and hardens them to the world””
Nope. I think it’s great for boys and girls to learn competitive sports, which don’t involve love and attachment last time I checked. What I don’t think is great is you claiming you’re “leaving girls better than you found them” by using them and dumping them. What YOU are saying is that casual hookup “relationships” have little to no long term impact on girls if handled correctly. You sound just like a sex positive feminist.
You know you’re full of shit, that’s why you’re so shrill and nasty to me. You don’t like me pointing it out. Well, too bad.
@Pajama. I don’t remember him retracting the “leave them better than you found them” mantra but if he did, great. And I never argued women shouldn’t take responsibility for agreeing to these relationships, in fact I’ve said the opposite several times.
The female equivalent of a YaReally is dinner/favor/attention whore who friendzones admirers for her own purposes. Imagine if I came on here and said “Hey, I have guy friends that I reject for sex but keep around as friends. I’m 100% honest with them that I’m not going to have sex with them. It’s not MY fault that they still hang around hoping for sex. They have to take responsibility for their own actions. I’m so awesome that even if I have to dump them for getting too attached, I’ve left them better than I found them because they’ve had the pleasure of my platonic attention and company.”
You’d tell me I was a bitch, and you’d be right.
@Amy
“You know you’re full of shit, that’s why you’re so shrill and nasty to me.”
I’m shrill and nasty to you because you say stupid things and then go off on damsel in distress tangents like this instead of using actual logic to rebuff any of my points, hoping that because your pic has a chick in it you can rally people here up against big bad YaReally so he stops pointing out that your logic is wrong and that you don’t know anything about the topics you argue about.
I’m just as “shrill and nasty” to guys who post retarded shit. And if you posted stuff that was on point I would acknowledge it like I do anyone else.
“The female equivalent of a YaReally is dinner/favor/attention whore who friendzones admirers for her own purposes.”
Not an equivalent argument. Sex is a scarce resource for men, so the chick is dangling a very rare carrot in front of him to suck his resources out of him. Sex is abundant for hot women and I don’t offer any kind of commitment so I’m not dangling anything rare in front of them.
In your example, the girl is dangling a million dollar bill in front of a homeless man. In my example I’m dangling a $100 in front of a millionaire.
Oh no, look, I’m being mean and nasty again!! Say it in a little girl voice and shed a crocodile tear to REALLY make me seem like a big poopy-head. That’s much better than actually making a valid point.
“You’d tell me I was a bitch, and you’d be right.”
I think most guys here would say those guys were idiots. But again, it’s not an equivalent analogy. I don’t expect you to understand that though, please throw out some more shaming bullshit.
Lol. YaReally, no damsel in distress here. Fire away. I can’t believe I have to spell this out for you, but I’ll try again. You don’t dangle sex, you dangle COMMITMENT. It doesn’t matter that you tell her you don’t want a relationship, because she’s wired to attach and hope for it anyway. Just like it doesn’t matter that the attention whore tells the chump she isn’t interested in sex, because he’s wired to want it and hope for it anyway.
I’m not saying the girls aren’t stupid to do this, any more than you’re saying the beta chumps aren’t tools. They’re letting themselves be exploited. But that doesn’t mean the users in these scenarios can boast that they’re leaving people “better than they found them”. That’s the part that’s pure bullshit.
Quick insta-DHV trick. Met a girl waiting for a train on a Monday. Parlayed into a date on Wednesday. Picked her up in my car, one of my female friends had left her lip gloss tucked in the passenger side visor and forgot about it. Hamster spinning ensued.
Try high heels.
I went to the club with a group of friends and one of the girls rode with me. I had already smashed her months before, so I didn’t care. Anyway, her heels got uncomfortable so she put on some extra flats she had brought just in case. I dropped her off and the next morning I noticed them in the passenger’s floor. I left them there without thinking much of it and went to pick up a chick I had yet to smashed.
The chick couldn’t stop asking me question about them and whether or not I’m in a relationship cheating.
I mean, who the fuck cares.
I live alone and I changed my toothbrush, but forgot to throw out the older one. Obviously, it raised some questions from this girl and I would have been stupid to tell her why it’s there.
We should macro-conceptualize this and get all the ladies wet! What’s that? Bill Clinton beat us to it? Darn.
Bill Clinton didn’t actually sacrifice his own pastry though, he just coerced the pastries from the taxpayers. Dumb broads couldn’t tell the difference though
A suggestion for CH: You may get better quality comments (and a higher number of comment section readers) if you disable the nesting feature.
Disagree.
No. Then you can’t have threads, and you just have an undifferentiated mass of 500 comments nobody will ever read.
@SFG (for example),
You most assuredly can have threads–a single coherent one. The comment sections as they NOW stand are an “undifferentiated mass of 500 comments that nobody reads.”
The multiple nested threads divert the discussion and are a magnet for “insiders” who too much time on their hands and too little to say.
“Irrational blaming of society/women/Jews for all their problems,”
BAAAAW, I’m not one of the popular kids. :”(
“Jews are plotting to take over the earth”
sigh…..you DO know that this is more or less the opinion of this blog right?
[CH: it is not. don’t confuse some commenters for blog writers. see copyright message to right of post. ps also don’t confuse “plotting” for “emergent property of tribal instinct.”]
ok, “cultural elites” then. Bottomline, SOMEBODY gets great pleasure of acting against average white people, ESPECIALLY if they aren’t SWPL city slickers.
[there is a lot of hatred for christian whites, and particularly christian white men. the haters are basically anyone who isn’t a christian white man. this includes secularized SWPLs.]
This is more what I meant.
@Noahpinion Why even bother to experiment with something that has such a disastrous downside? Oh yeah, anti-white (goy) male animus.— (@heartiste) June 21, 2013
http://heartiste.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/the-mind-of-the-manboob-hugo-schwyzer-case-study/
“I leave it as an exercise for the reader why a guy like Hugo Schwyzer would reflexively perceive the majority white male contingent as the Other.”
“ps also don’t confuse “plotting” for “emergent property of tribal instinct.”]”
Naturally. (“more or less” heh)
The unmentionables “plot” the demise of goyishe whites the same way women “plot” the figurative castration of men by favoring competition decreasing (IMBRA) and hypergamy enabling (legalized cuckoldry) legislation. It’s all about the hindbrain, no actual planning needed.
Well, it’s not exactly Zombie Shane’s Frankfurt School theory so that’s that.
CH used to not have the nesting, and the comments are not nearly as meaningful or digestible in that format.
He should run that experiment again.
The comment sections at Sailer’s and Mangan’s are far better.
As Laidnyc observed, it’s Beyond Thunderdome in here.
there’s about a 50-50 split between pro-nesters and anti-nesters. what’s a tyrant to do?
I vote for nest. Much more fun and entertaining.
I guess inline would facilitate a more coherent discussion but I just don’t see the point. I can only take so much ‘Frankfurt School’. It’s better to have pockets so people find their own niche especially with the extremely wide group of people that the blog brings in from politically indifferent libertines to politically charged hard righters who don’t care about pick up.
Choose simplicity.
If my vote counts for anything, I spend far more time reading comments here specifically because of the nesting feature than I do at other blogs without it.
Nest, because it’s easier to skip like 90% of the retarded non-game related arguments. God forbid if I had to actually read through 99 comments about black people or religion to find the one game related one to reply to lol
Can I break the tie? Nesting.
that’s actually a vote against nesting.
is nesting what we have now the way it’s always been? I vote nesting.
as I”m not a blog nerd and this is the only thing I read on the interwebz I don’t even know what this means.
Lol I know. I’m using reverse psychology.
I co-sign YaReally’s vote and reason. Sometimes the shit flies fast and deep and you really really really, some days, just want a quick bit of information that is pertinent to the article.
However, with non-nesting you could argue that it force people to contribute serious thoughts instead of ramblings. I don’t see how ‘Frankfurt School’, Jews are plotting to take over the earth, illumanti, ‘get married right now and have 10 children’, would survive when it’s front and center.
In the end I think the comments would actually reflect more on the specific posts than rabbit trails.
Why not give it a trial run? Maybe it will be better. You never know until you give a it shot. It’s not like it would really cost anything.
Stfu
Exhibit A.
Stfu, Donny.
Bringing down the banhammer/shiv of stfu on droning posts would do the trick
Suggest my balls
Disagree. I can pretty much see a what’s a thread about and just scroll past it whole when I see the usual crap that seems to seep into every fucking post (just look for the words YKW or Frankfurt School).
Stiffer did that in A.P.2
“I looove old people!” (beatific smile)
Here’s a new one: What does it mean to an LTR or ONS if a girl says she gets off to babysitter porn.
As in the babysitter being seduced by the family? Then she wants a threesome with an older woman and you in attendance (doesn’t have to be much older woman, or she can just pretend to be older). Or do you mean “babysitter on camera masturbating while family is away” stuff? If that, tell her to make a video like that for you and you can watch it with her. Or maybe she’s just drunk and babbling like chicks do once lubed up, I have no context to work with here.
Babysitter being seduced by daddy.
Fairly certain that was the scenario, heh.
Great. Dress her up in a school girl uniform (you know exactly the one I mean) and have her watch your dog for a while as you go out drinking and picking up girls in the bar down the street for a couple of hours. Come home and ravish her. You get access to more plates (potentially), you get some alcohol, you come home and you have wild monkey sex. I see no downside to this.
Get her to start calling you “Daddy” during sex. If she fails to address you as such, ignore her until she does. Refer to her as “babygirl”, and pat her on the head like a child when she does something good. Pull her pants down and smack her bare ass when she fucks up. Then, push her head down so she can make it up to you. If she’s sporting pigtails, like a good babygirl should, then pull hard on them handlebars as she deep-throats your cock. Make sure she drinks her man-milk like a good, ‘lil babygirl.
Spot on.
Next ravishing I’ll make use of this.
Oddly this is exactly the same advice on love I got from my grandmother
Depends on a bajillion things you didn’t list here, brah.
are you sure she didn’t mean babysitter seducing the young man that she’s babysitting?
I’m hoping that she meant the daddy seducing the babysitter while he’s driving her back to her house…..but given the number of English major teachers who are seducing their students, not so sure anymore.
Generally my answer to all “what does it mean” questions is … why don’t YOU find out and tell me?
I’m not sure I understand, she didn’t ask a question, she made a positive statement. Your answer in that frame doesn’t quite jibe. Can you explain?
Oh, ah, you were directing that towards thrust, I totally brain farted on that one.
Babysitter being seduced by daddy – pretty sure that was the theme.
I did ask about it – just not with the depth that I should have. She’s 21, I’m 27. I figured it was a combination of older man authority figure, seducing innocent snowflake into being cum gobbling whore. Zero responsibility on her side etc..
All I can recall was that she said it turned her on.
I’m sure you’re right. It’s not a big deal.
Yo AMY~!
To make this question digestible, we’ll agree that you don’t watch porn anymore.
However, when you did – what kinds of porn were you into? How did it make you feel? Was it BETTER to stimulate yourself over the hottest porn you had, than being taken by your current bf/fb at the time?
What porn has given you the greatest stimulation.. why?
It was my ex who said she gets off to babysitter scenarios. I simply found it as someone looking for plausible deniability on her end from a ravishing, attractive, mature authority figure, in order to relish in the Madonna/Whore complex. That was my assumption, so I didn’t gauge further.
We still fuck – yes, I have other plates on the go – but hey, at the bar when I’m bouncing – she’s there eye-fucking me – I’m not gonna say no. Fucking an attractive girl after dealing with shitheads all night is bliss to me.
Women fantasize about demonstrating their maternal and sexual abilities to mysterious men without committing adultery.
It depends. The main thing for me is that I don’t like obvious roleplay or acting, I like it to look real. Any type of resistance “seduction” is good, even if it’s pretty hard core. Lesbians- eh, sometimes. I’m not into watching 3+ groups or black guys (or girls). I hate gay porn. I like it when the girl is sweet and innocent looking without tattoos, which of course eliminates about 95% of all porn. Lol
Babysitter/dad, teacher/student, policeman/arrestee… all the same dynamic. It’s hot if it’s done well, but it usually isn’t.
No porn is better than real sex, imo. If it is, you’ve got the wrong partner.
Now for some concern trolling. Isn’t this the chick you dumped and have had trouble getting over? Because I don’t think you can be “just fucking” unless you don’t care about her anymore. Just sayin’.
@ Amy
“Babysitter/dad, teacher/student, policeman/arrestee… all the same dynamic. It’s hot if it’s done well, but it usually isn’t.”
Yea, that’s all the shit my ex liked.
“Now for some concern trolling. Isn’t this the chick you dumped and have had trouble getting over? Because I don’t think you can be “just fucking” unless you don’t care about her anymore. Just sayin’.”
Sure we’re fucking. I fucked it up a week ago by trying to define wtf was going on. Mistake on my part, haha never again.
So I don’t initiate shit. If she texts me, then that’s fine I’ll hook up with her. We had the hottest dom/sub plowing last weekend. She slept over. I walked her to her car when we got up and that’s it.
She’s a club slut so I see her a lot at my club – she used to be a barmaid there. Her and her girls got bottle service last Thursday – one of her friends came by me and said ‘she still loves you!” I smiled back.
We’re in different lifestyles – my issue was I didn’t let up a bit. Should have, as it the ltr would have been more fun.
As long as I’m getting pussy while looking for alternatives, all is well imo.
Its means she’s pretty much up for anything. Get her into a threesome or some group sex ASAP; the longer you wait, the less likely it is to ever happen.
This type of thing actually does work. Seen it happen when others have tried it. It’s gold if you do it right. I’ve only committed random acts of charity outside of the sight of others on general principle, but have seen others do it successfully as you note.
On OSU campus this last Christmas season some guy bought an extra pizza and walked outside and handed it to the huddled nobbobs who were on the sidewalk. It was friggin’ cold as shit at the time (hell the whole winter was miserable) Women were needless to say walking by in high quantity and quality (it’s OSU campus for goodness sake, and it was about time for the ritual bar hopping to begin). He acted like he didn’t see them and made his effort look like a genuine act of kindness (it may well have been too, tbh, I didn’t talk to him). Had a small pack of girls walk up (or arrive as he had just stood up from his gesture) and start talking to him beaming smiles. I had to lit out and pick up my son from a night class he was taking for fun, or I would have stayed and tried to observe how it worked out. Based on the huge smile quotient though I’m betting this guy snagged several numbers unsolicited.
Another fun game like this is of course being kind to an animal that is hurt, wounded or generally lost looking (assuming it isn’t vicious or liable to strike out), followed closely by taking your own dog to the dog park on a Friday afternoon when many of the working type women take off and hang out with their pups. Man + Dog = Instant conversation.
Hang on, sloopy
And as an added note of fun,he had rubbed the pizza on his balls beforehand.
Not sure shat you are on about. Corvalis has a lower than average student body
Lol, excellent closing of this post.
Not quite a homeless guy for me. Older African-American gentleman, living on SS or disability or some such. He’s probably got a little bit more cash than he lets on, kind of a rascal that way, but, I have an AmEx Platinum.
I’ll always comp him a Bud Light if I see him at my local karaoke joint on weekends. One night I’m just chilling with my dog at this other place with a rooftop deck, watching the game when he comes by, Bartender, a beta-destroying alpha widow who absolutely chews up her men, former South Florida HB9.5 but gonna turn 31 this year and it shows just that little bit, is surprised when I order his drink along with my own usual German thing.
He and I chat. Then he’s hungry, and I realize it’s kind of a drama whenever he orders his plate of fries (all he wants to eat. Guy’s approaching 80. Whatever), So as he’s talking, I touch her wrist and say “Melissa, I got it,” real quiet. She was absolutely stunned. Just kept eyeing me after that.
Year ago, I might have been her next victim. Received the nomination on several occasions. But these days, my favorite thing is to pick up some other woman at the karaoke place, take her home, and have Melissa see us walk out. The expression on her face is always priceless. Especially when they’re younger than her. Later that night at the karaoke place I was making out ferociously with an older Cornhusker who was heading home tomorrow and kind of in a hurry, Melissa got off her shift early and walked in, so I told my new friend it was time to go. We walk past, pretty oblivious to the pretty blonde. So to make me jealous she turns and kisses her next-to-last BF, an ectomorph with a measure of game whom she’d completely destroyed last year. I saw it out of the corner of my eye and kept walking, but did have to explain to my new friend why I needed to stop and laugh a bit en route to my apartment
Since then, Melissa’s always been nice to me. It’s weird.
/Even easier for me to pull 7s and 8s at karaoke bars on the islands of St. Petersburg–more tourists, fewer lesbians–but unless Melissa sees it and flips out, it almost doesn’t count. And her apartment’s right next to the karaoke place.
Of course! Negro game!Leverage the Frankfurt School,imbibng young hotties with a soul searing concern for the dear blacketty-blacks;’stead of being Mr. Klan,you flip mthe script. Help the old duffer out! This is gold,Jerry,gold!
>Oh yeah, and you fed a homeless guy, which is better than giving him cash money which will inevitably be spent on liquor.
I’m homeless and i completely support this. Bunch of degenerate fuckups, we are. I, myself don’t drink, but 98% of the homeless population does. More importantly, %99.99999 of us don’t deserve jack shit. Keep that in mind, y’all.
I’ve found that homeless people will response to an offer of food by claiming to be allergic to whatever you’re offering and then asking for money “for the bus” or for “medicine”.
Remember that women have a cruel side just as men do. I’ve had women respond really well to homeless shaming on my part. EG, “If you didn’t have bus fare you shouldn’t have bought that whiskey I can smell coming off you” or “you’ve been using that story about how you just got out of prison and need money for the Greyhound for the last three months. Try something else.”
…
I’ve never really distrusted “science” until now. This all seems to fit in to a narrative to destroy things that we all hold dear.
http://www.vice.com/read/science-says-love-doesnt-exist
Not sure what rubs me the wrong way about it, or why I don’t believe it. It’s just more of the same.
Check out this stupid quote:
“That’s not to say, by the way, that men leave. Any member of any couple could well want to take off, male or female, gay or straight. Sarah Hrdy’s Mother Nature: Maternal Instincts and How They Shape the Human Species is a brutal, unsentimental take on female sexual and maternal instincts. Totally intuitive statements from Hrdy like “Wherever women have both control over their reproductive opportunities and a chance to better themselves, women opt for well-being and economic security over having more children,” shouldn’t blow anyone’s mind, but they often do.”
They just had to add this little tidbit in, notice how it isn’t really from the study…it’s just from some stupid femmie book but it’s chained in to the ‘science.’
Maybe I’m just becoming older or more conservative…(which is sad cause I’m still in my mid 20′s)….but the word ‘perverse’ comes to mind.
“Wherever women have both control over their reproductive opportunities and a chance to better themselves, women opt for well-being and economic security over having more children”
And most, like my 30yr old sister, are jaded, awkwardly ‘happy’, and substitute a dog for a kid.
it’s not really about whether love exists or whatever, it’s just how full of bullshit the world is.
semantic games
This is not science. That is commentary. The language alone should drive that point home. And to be critical of science is actually a mark of recognizing it’s limitations.
Whenever a story starts with “Science has discovered” or something the like you can be reasonably sure that a scientifically illiterate person is writing off of a press release.
Helping a homeless guy?
Lol, who are you and what have you done with CH?
It’s done in the spirit of sociopathy, you see, he’s not doing it to help the guy for real so much as to get women to go to bed with him. He’s playing on their deepest emotions to elicit standard responses, the homeless guy is just the prop he’s using to achieve this end. The good thing about this is that it fits the pragmatic argument for liberty and charity in that the giver of charity need not be motivated by altruism or the outcomes of his act in regards to the recipient. The recipient benefits even if the benefactor actually loathes him.
Thinking of CH pulling this move reminds me of Patrick Bateman’s encounter in the alley with Al the drunk bum.
And might I point out, it elicited the response from you that assumed he was being a great guy (“what have you done with CH”) which is proof positive as to its effectiveness.
I assumed he was being a great guy because of the last line, which suggested that he usually gives bums money, but has found the food approach is more useful. Versus giving them nothing, which is what I would’ve predicted.
And as for effectiveness…. don’t chicks dig jerks? I think I’m supposed to get hot and bothered by the guys who beat up the homeless, not feed them.
Puffed Ho is such a poisonous pit of rotting garbage. It is disheartening to know it is viewed by 80% of men and 100% of women as a legit “high end” news source. I unscientifically concluded that Huffington is single handedly responsible for a large % of the fucked up attitudes we see in women today. They *all* read it.
How do we get CH the same level of readership as Puffed ho?
Recently found out my 30yr old sister reads it. No surprise given my reply to Scray.
Gawker Media is pretty much to blame as well. If it weren’t for their abysmal comment section layout.
And the bums don’t treat the food like it might be tampered with?
That’s the reaction I’ve always gotten doing something like this. The hobos are extremely wary of any food given, for good reason
They’re often homeless because they are paranoid schizo: they don’t trust anyone. They don’t trust employers, landlords, roommates, etc. That’s how they got to be homeless in the first place. Successful commerce requires a little faith.
Give em brownies spiked with both weed and a laxative, it’s awesome.
This is how I treat the homeless.
Start at 1:07
What do you think of the Theories of Sheppard? Women are scarcely human in his eyes! One thinks of the Kzinti Cats: only the males are intelligent; the females little more than animals were almost no capacity to speak. What a blessing that would be. Our females are in that awkward in between stage….
http://www.heretical.com/sheppard/women.html
He’s some kind of sperg lord. It’s painful to read even when you agree with it.
My buddy Adam who lives around the corner from me is very religious, enough that in the fall he started a “ministry” of buying winter coats and sleeping bags & then giving them for free to people sleeping outdoors in Denver’s public parks. He had some friends from his church help him & word spread & soon people from other churches started to help also. One of them was a very attractive young lady. They just got engaged this weekend.
CH this is the new Vox’s explanation re affirm action case:
The Supreme Court ruled voters can ban affirmative action
The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that voters can ban affirmative action in admissions at public colleges and universities. In its decision, the court upheld a Michigan constitutional amendment that stopped state colleges and universities from taking race into account when admitting students. That amendment passed in 2006 with a 58 percent majority.
Tuesday’s ruling, a 6-2 decision, is not about whether considering race in admissions is constitutional. The court’s 2003 decision in Grutter v. Bollinger remains in place: colleges can consider students’ race in the admissions process, provided they meet certain conditions. The court had the option to overturn that decision in 2013, in Fisher v. Texas, and did not.
The central question the court faced in the Michigan case, instead, was: is it fair for voters to ban the use of racial preferences? Or did the ban violate the rights of minority voters by creating an unfair playing field for affirmative action’s supporters?
This case, Schuette v. the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, Integration and Immigrant Rights and Fight For Equality By Any Means Necessary, was at its heart about who can decide whether affirmative action is employed at public universities.
zlozlzozlzlo this literally word-for-word could describe the analysis of Roe v Wade. That case, contrary to popular ignorant lay opinion, was not about “whether abortion is legal.” That case was exactly like the new affirm action case. It was about state’s rights or lack thereof — whether a STATE can ban abortion (the legislative branch, the elected branch, the democratic with a small D branch of govt). But in Roe the court finagled a woman’s “fundamental right” to kill babies under the “penumbras” of the Bill of Rights’ 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 8th amendments. lzozoozlzll never mind the totally dead 10th amendment.
lzozlzozoooz
fuck us all
What I find curious is that an university could use the same rationale to pursue homogeneity and discriminate against people different than the main demographic of their student body.
This is U.S. centric blog so most of you guys won’t have com across ‘gypsy beta beggar game’ that exists in parts of the Middle East and Europe. This involves you being with a girl walking back from a bar/club area, and having some gypsy kid descend on you and try to sell you a rose for your girl. This is especially prevalent in Muslim influenced societies due to the importance of charity in Islam.
Naturally, the first instinct of a player should be to tombstone the fucker in a manner that would make the Undertaker jealous. He’s basically blackmailing you, because if you don’t buy the thing, he will pester you while trying to make you look cheap in front of your girl.
The standard procedure is to give him a token amount–far less than he thinks he’s getting–and then tell him you don’t want the rose and then send him off with a ruffle of the hair. Although, I like to craftily grip his hair as I’m doing it ,and shake the little bastard’s head while smiling and looking magnanimous. In this way, you don’t look cheap, don’t give him much money, and don’t pedestal her buy buying her a rose.
Gypsy beta beggar game defence. Works everytime.
these rose gypsies are all over major US cities now. thanks, diversity!
What is the standard response to rose sellers on dates? Happens all the time in US, gypsy or not? I feel like the struggle of “he’s cheap” vs “he’s beta” is really a tough one and failing to buy the stupid flower turns the girl off more than just buying it with a big smile but not like you are pedastalizing her, just that you’re giving the dude money and it’s no big deal.
buy the flower, break off the stem and put it in your lapel or behind your ear. or buy it and throw it away in the nearest garbage can. if she asks why you threw it away just say charity is good for the soul but who needs a stinking flower or something similar
[look at your girl]: “aw that’s sweet. he wants you to buy me a rose. so progressive!”
As a teenager on a date I asked a flower peddler: “do you take credit cards”
I like to craftily grip his hair
Be sure to wash your hands afterwards. Who knows what parasites and pathogens the gypsy scum carry around with them. Sometimes a simple “fuck off!” and menacing gesture will clear the way.
Or you can tell him that you don’t support child abuse, theft and tax evasion, so you buy your girls flowers from a flower shop. The flowers gypsies sell are usually withered too. What a worthless people.
Most leftists are useful idiots and ignorant about their ignorance. The distinction is that virtually all SERIOUS left-wing intellectuals and politicians are all Fox-Piven/Alinksy/Cultural Marxists.
In the left wing religion, the high priests are really all Satanists. Scratch the surface of any serious left-wing intellectual and you find a sadistic psychopath gleefully foisting chaos and carnage on society. Engage an environmentalist for an hour, and you’ll eventually get to their schemes to gleefully destroy the world of humanity Dr. Evil style irrespective of actual human consequences. Any gay activist wants traditional order destroyed. Even Andrew Sullivan, who seems thoughtful: “can’t wait until the period of US dominance is over.” The left wing gibberish (feminism, civil rights, environmentalism) is just window dressing.
This isn’t to say that there aren’t real environmental, feminist, etc.. issues, it is just that these movements will always be co-opted by the sadistic psychopaths.
Bonus points for feeding a black?
I think so.
Also later you can return a la Bateman with a briefcase and a … Lecture on supply side economics.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NY3yzLA-g24&w=560&h=315%5D
I like the way you think.
when there’s a choice, i help out the white bum. like almost all blacks, i too am comfortable with my tribalism.
Three cheers for Milton Fuckn’ Friedman!
“Also later you can return a la Bateman with a briefcase and a … Lecture on supply side economics.”
It’s even worse in the book.
Makes me wonder how tipping fits into the charity spectrum. One of my friends is kind of beta for a guy who used to force rural Mexican girls into indentured servitude in his whorehouse, ironically enough. Some of the behaviors he models are clearly bad, but some are good, and tipping is one of those things I’ve puzzled over.
He leaves $2 in quarters on the table, and every time the waitress annoys him in the slightest, he takes away a quarter. He brags loudly about how cheap he is, and says, “She knew that the job was only going to pay $2.50 an hour when she took it. She could go get a better job. I hate tipping. Tipping is robbery!” I’ve seen him tip $0.75 for a $100 meal.
I, on the other hand, tend to tip 20-30%. I probably do tip even higher when the waitress is a pretty girl, but I’ve tipped flaming fags and land whales at close to the same rate. I’ve worked shit jobs, and I’ve always enjoyed being nice to people working shit jobs now that I’m comparatively rich. The extra $10 or whatever is nothing to me. I could wipe my ass with it.
I always tip, but if the service is shitty, I tip as little as $0.01, so it’s not an automatic thing where I walk through the door and a huge tip is guaranteed. One of the girls I tipped $0.01 was rather pretty, but she was too busy doing whatever to refresh my drink, and made me find the manager to get my check after I had sat there entirely too long, so she got one shiny penny.
I have this debate with my friend regularly. He thinks I’m an idiot, and I will get more respect for being a cheap bastard like he is. I think he’s just an asshole, and he isn’t doing himself any favors by being so stingy.
On the one hand, worrying about looking cheap seems to fall into the beta bucks spectrum, and on the other, we have this CH example of generosity with an ulterior motive, and alpha charity.
I’ll probably continue to be a ridiculous tipper either way, because I enjoy it.
Tipping big if you can’t afford it, as a lavish display to somehow impress people, is silly. If you on the other hand can afford tipping big it’s basically just magnanimity and there’s nothing wrong with it per se, as long as it isn’t automatic and it is attached to decent service. So yeah, I’m on board with your take on tipping. Having worked as a bartender it’s great to get tips for delivering good service.
I think this is how Vronsky hooked Anna Karenina, more or less.
Also in Dangerous Liaisons
That’s right … I’d forgotten that.
Law 12 of the 48 Laws of Power: Use Selective Honesty and Generosity to Disarm your Victim
[…] By CH […]
lol yeah great advice! it’s not enough to run gamey game and fake being a man — you can also fake being a human being by pretending to care about others!
How desperate you guys must be, going to these ridiculous lenghts in order to please women. No different than leftie manginas.
The other day i read a roosh article, about how it took him weeks to “get laid” with some whore from a foreign country. Um, three weeks! LOL! Well no wonder the teenage boys come running to him for “advice” … only three weeks huh? :O)
The irony is, if you just shitcan the pathetic Game Gurus, and instead develop youself as a man, you won’t have to grovel around europe playing pussybeggar, hoping like some sad prom princess that the phone rings and maybe youll “get laid.”
You sure won’t have to wait three weeks, like your hero did, in order to achieve your sad little goal. The women will come to you, and you will not have to wait three weeks, or three hours. And that’s something that roosh and the gameboys will never experience, because it’s just too darn hard to actually become a man … far easier to just remain a boy and play pretend, fake being a man, fake helping others, just fake it all. Then pat yourself on the back after three weeks of fakery when you achieve a “goal” that wasn’t worth the effort, much less the forgery of your character.
did you get it out of your system, ray ray?
ps time to move your traveling sideshow to berating women for going to ridiculous lengths to please men by caking on makeup and dressing well.
This is the Bateman issue.
How do you know if Charity is actually sincere?
No higherly intelligent liberal actually believes the bullshit that they pedal.
One can wish to free Nelson Mandela, cure AIDS and still want to exterminate blacks from a neighbourhood.
Why does it matter if the charity is sincere or not? If the person is getting some food/money/shelter, then the purpose of charity is fulfilled, that is, helping another human being who needs help. There is absolutely no need for emotional investment in the person nor in being judged “sincere” by others for the practical results of charity to occur.
Why would any sane soul have wanted to free Nelson Mandela (not really a question at you, you just mentioned him and it got me to thinking). He was a foul, evil man and should have rotted to his death in prison.
“How desperate you guys must be, going to these ridiculous lenghts in order to please women. No different than leftie manginas.”
Except for the fact that they’re not leftie. Or manginas.
AFCs should be banned from commenting here.
You know the real irony ray? You spent time in your life reading the article, then more time being angry, then even more time tapping out your little tantrum. The manosphere owns your soul ray.
The real gem of this comment is that developing yourself as a man only takes a few minutes.
Another aspect of homeless helper game which is not to be underestimated is when you help a homeless chick by letting her stay with you; not a stinking homeless chick actually sleeping out in the woods or under a bridge, but one that just stays with different people from time-to-time or occasionally sleeps in her car.
Trust me on this one.
This is AKA pimping or white slaving.
If you move her from property to property it is human trafficking.
According to feminists, almost everything is either pimping or human trafficking.
It’s wishful thinking on their part really.
Rape me! Rape me! They seem to skree skraw.
Interesting. I wade through bumhood five days a week in downtown Miami. Tonight, this feckless pussy I work with actually waited for me to leave because he didn’t want to walk past the bums by himself at night. Granted, the bums congregate in large numbers under the overpass when the sun sets, but fuck: Hold your head high, take up a lot of space, and march.
On Mill street here in Tempe, bums run in large packs as well. From the wide berth most the females around here approach them with, I don’t see this tactic generating any hero worship. You may gain points for slapping a bum around with a cudgel if you see them bothering anyone though.
If you are gunning for the “awwws,” just get a puppy or a buddy with down-syndrome and be willing to act silly with em.
My brother gave me a couple of skanky C-grade porn mags for Christmas once as a joke/neg…walking home i gave them to a homeless guy..Ive never seen a bum so elated..he thanked me whole-heartedly and happily began to get comfy under his blankets that cold winter evening.
Too bad no women saw my kind gesture tho.
Just out of curiosity: is there a difference between CH posting under his name with the picture of that silhouette and him simply editing someone’s post and replying that way?
Pharisee Game.
[…] If you live in a metropolitan region where there’s a nontrivial per capita population of homeless, and you see the same street bums lounging on the same spots of sidewalk on your daily constitutional, you can run what I call Homeless Helper Game. […]
I can’t endorse this tactic. There are a few things one doesn’t feed in life: trolls, bears, alligators, attention whores, but most importantly derelicts. There are other tactics that don’t result in human detritus shitting up your streets. I do wonder if being a social enforcer and dressing down bum feeders might not be a good tactic though (sure you might have to risk physicality, but its for the greater good).
The strong give to the weak. It’s somewhat patronizing which is good.