– Yard sales and consignment shops are lucrative venues for picking up girls. Good ratio + young babes + opener props = win.
– When a hot chick makes a funny, don’t laugh too hard. In fact, don’t laugh at all. Just smile. LOLing is approval seeking.
– Be wary of conversational entrapment. The longer you talk about a woman’s concerns, the more likely she’ll friendzone you.
– Approaching in coffee shops is tough, b/c it’s so obvious. Try making a face at the girl first. Chicks love silliness.
– Make fun of chickscript. “O-M-G, that’s so totes true!!!” Girls love flirty teasing with an edge. Shows fearlessness.
– If you text a girl you met the night before and she asks who you are, text back “Kanye West”. Keeps the pickup ball rolling.
– Misinterpret a girl’s actions as coming on to you. Girl says hi, you reply: “Whoa, save the pillow talk for later, speedy gonzales.”
– Smile at women you pass on the street. Many more than you think will smile back. Lead with a smile, as you lead in life.
– When you have a woman at the foot of your bed, simultaneously grab her hair and palm her pussy while kissing her neck. Magic.
– If you distrust your girlfriend, don’t let it show. Feigned naivete is a powerful weapon against devious playettes. Think long-term strategy.
– Drop something. Dramatically pick it up. While bending, look over your shoulder at the girl, and ask “Getting an eyeful?” Assume the sale.
– Don’t get too excited by a girl’s physical escalation. She’ll value your ensuing interest less. Steer the seduction.
– If a girl mentions another man, hold up your hand & say “You hear that?” “What?” “The sound of this conversation dying.”
– Never tolerate a girl showing up later than you to a date. Visit another bar then return in ten minutes. She still not there? Leave. Alternate option: Talk to other girls who may be at the bar. When she arrives, she’ll experience preselection overload.
– When you meet for a date, don’t hug the girl. She’s expecting it then. Be bold and unpredictable. Touch her on your terms. Leave the beta males to eagerly lap up asexual hugs.
– After sex, or before if you like risk, tell girl “I’m not interested in a relationship with anyone.” Money-saving MOAB game.
– Emulate this guy. (Not the poker player.)
– Art museums are great first date venues to demonstrate not just knowledge, but wry humor as well. “Did he paint nipples?”
– If a date is going well, you’ll be tempted to stop challenging a woman. Don’t. Save your full acceptance until after sex.
– Got an arm cast? Have a niece or a few women sign it. Not an option? Fake it. Draw flowers and hearts. Cast game is nuclear.
– Pace a girl’s unspoken objections. “This is really crazy meeting a stranger on the street.” Pacing disarms and re-norms.
– ”That’s just something a girl says when she can’t handle her feelings for a man” is a good, all-purpose reply to a shit test.
– If you go out a lot, you will have make-outs. Fresh breath extends sessions. Tip: chew mint leaves on your way out the door.
– If you kiss a girl and she reacts with confusion or pulls away, wait a beat and sexily say “hot”. Instant mood lifter.
– Science can segue to sexytime. “I read that people relate based on smell compatibility.” *sniff* “Your love smell is strong.”
– ”I know how this ends. You’ll fall in love. Hard. Dream of rings and white weddings. I’ll run.” – said to a girl on 2nd date. Try it with a straight face. It’s chicknip.
Your Daily Game… take one a day for boner health!
Real estate open houses are replete with prospects.
The ‘designer showcase house’ is another great venue.
Waayyy off-topic, but I swear that guys like Rush Limbaugh and VDH are lurking in the manosphere.
Earlier today, Rush was ragging on American women because they can only be 166 lbs fat in order to use the abortion kill pill, whereas European women can be up to 176 lbs fat for the same kill pill.
And VDH has a new column up which looks like it was copy-n-pasted straight from the manosphere:
“What more could Miley Cyrus do – wear two foam fingers? Could Mr. West mount his girlfriend, and sing and dance while riding backwards?”
http://pjmedia.com/victordavishanson/a-culture-in-ruins/?singlepage=true
That’s a scholar at the Hoover Institute, on the campus of Stanford University, using the verb “to mount” in a published column.
Shit damn.
Folks are starting to take off the gloves.
yeah a couple posts back rush and ch had the same take on the same article at about the same time or nearly so. rush definitely has the a lot of the same perspectives as most manosphere sites (feminists = bitter uglies comes to mind)
Game is applied Conservatism.
> “Game is applied Conservatism.”
Yep.
And the biggest “Game” of all is gathering together, with your homeboys, in Filthydelphia, and writing a mutual letter to King George, telling him to go fuck himself.
Then “applying” your life and your fortune and your sacred honor towards bringing about that end.
On that note… what do you all think about crypto-currencies that are deflationary, especially Bitcoins?
I haven’t given it enough thought, but it appears to be one hell of a cool way to overthrow stupid governments without wars or any other traditional overthrowing mechanisms… and without having to wait for the system to self correct.
What do you all think?
I’m driving down the road several times a week now – almost every day – listening to the radio, and swearing to GOD ALMIGHTY that Rush is lurking, both here at The Chateau, and also over at iSteve.
I’m telling you, guys like Rush and Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity and Bill O’Reilly aren’t secure enough yet with their advertisers to confess to it, but they are definitely being informed by the Manosphere and the Dark Enlightenment [for instance, O’Reilly is all over Colin Flaherty’s work at WND].
Maybe they’re even posting here under aliases, and helping to move the message forward?
Who knows? But they certainly aren’t the clueless tards that their producers insist that they pretend to be.
I’d bet on the personalities being (or having become) clueless tards, but their assistants are snorting the red pill.
Go into victoria’s secret, tell the hot salesgirl you’re looking for something for your wife, and your girlfriend, “Should I get them in the same thing or different colors?” Deadpan, at first.
21st Century Cynicism Game: The intentionally-removed wedding band [revealing the telltale suntan circle] so as to fake bachelorhood being replaced by the intentionally-worn purchased wedding band so as to fake husbandhood.
She’ll Always Lust After What She “Can’t” Have Game FTW.
Does anybody really have luck with wedding ring game? The principle makes very good sense, but wearing my real wedding ring doesn’t seem to have any desirable effect.
Maybe I’m still being naive, but I’m starting to think this whole wedding ring phenomenon, like a whole lot of the rest of game, works better in an urban environment.
This should be made into a competition: who can make the most outrageously “misogynist” request of a saleswoman in a Victoria’s Secret (or similar) retail store and still get stellar service? Video submissions.
Not bad. Even better: “Do you have anything in a 48A?” The look first of confusion, then slowly dawning comprehension? Priceless.
My five year old, walking past Victoria’s Secret with the wife the other day, loudly exclaimed, “Mommy, that’s the place I am going to get you something really nice for Christmas!”
That’s not ….uh how we roll in my posse. He confused it with a little jewelry store next door where he has saved money to buy the wife a charm for a necklace.
Supposedly half the folks were horrified, half the guys smirked.
Most likely result: Totally ignorant sales girl doesn’t understand anything and just goes into Hard Sell mode.
RE: cast game. A variation on it that a friend of mine invented: Go in to a bar/ breastaurant of your choice (we did this at Hooters) with a few marker-drawn tattoos on your arms/neck/wherever is legal. Offer to let women draw whatever they want on you. The Hooters Girls were fighting over who got to draw on my friend next and he was a drunk mess/not looking particular good that day. I got numbers just by being around him and drawing funny sh*t on his arms.
-1 wing skills
“Cast game is nuclear.”
I lol-ed
Cast game, I love this. I’m laughing because I remember a guy in college coming up to me to sign his arm cast, he had all these girls names and numbers with smiley faces. I signed. He told me to put down my number and I said “why, you’ll never remember who I am with all these girls’ numbers on here” and he said, “put down ‘snobby girl’” so I know.” Lol! Now I now it was cast game + neg.
> “…a guy in college… Now I now it was cast game + neg.”
NOW you know?
It wasn’t abundantly obvious to you at the time?
What was your major in “college” – Marine Biology with a senior honor’s thesis on “The Breeding Habits of Mudsharks?
It wasn’t “abundantly obvious” that it was a planned strategy. Did I know he was trying to pick me up? Yea of course.
You’re unusually nasty today. And I think we established earlier I’m not a mudshark.
> “And I think we established earlier I’m not a mudshark.”
Prove it.
All these comments and not one mention of putting white buns in her oven?
All these comments and not one mention of putting white buns in her oven?
————————————————————————————————–
And so It is with great regret,
that I stand before you tonight,
to announce I will not seek, nor will I accept,
your nomination,
to put a white bun in Amy’s oven.
(Betty Crocker and Aunt Jamima stand tearful, visibly upset)
There’s no self-cleaning cycle on this kind of oven.
That was a real try-hard neg.
In order to be “try-hard”, it has to be difficult.
Otherwise it’s just a “stealing-candy-from-a-baby” neg.
YOU ARE ALL NOW IN PATRICE’S COURT OF LAW
3 DEFENDANTS:
MATT – A KNOWN SHITPOSTER THAT COMBINES THE IGNORANCE OF RELIGION, THE OBFUSCATION AFFORDED BY OBSOLETE LANGUAGE, AND THE WHITE-KNIGHTING OF BETAS. WHEN HIS HYPOCRISY GETS CALLED OUT, HE AVOIDS TO RESPOND, AND WHEN HE ISN’T RESPONDED TO, HE CREATES AN IMAGINARY PUPPET SHOW.
RD – A TANKGRRL EMPOWERED ‘FEMALE’ (TERM USED LOOSELY BASED ON HER BODY WITH A CUPS) THAT TRIES TO ACT TOUGH ON THE INTERNET TO GIVE OFF A MANLY DISPOSITION THAT SHE’S TOO STRONG TO BE AFFECTED BY RAPE (YO!) BUT AVOIDS UNCOMFORTABLE TOPICS IN THINLY-VEILED DESPERATION. BETTER JUDGE OF ENGLISH THAN MEN; AT LEAST WORDS WON’T RAPE HER.
AMY – ARGUABLY ONE OF THE WORST SHITPOSTERS IN RECENT MONTHS. HER AFFINITY FOR BADBOY THUGS, LAME JOB, CONTEMPT FOR LEARNING, AND DISDAIN FOR TRUTH HAS EVEN SPARKED THE IRE OF CH HIMSELF WHO NEEDED TO CORRECT HER IN RECENT THREADS AND ASK HER NOT TO STRAY OFF TOO FAR AWAY FROM THE LINES OF COHERENCY.
Reasonings:
@Matt – I sent you two long replies; I know you’ll appreciate them, as you are the “King” of verbosity yourself. But why no reply? I am sorry if I upset you by pointing out your hypocrisies – I expected so much from such an ardent believer. Is avoiding me and calling me names how you win debates? What personality disorder is associated with ignorance, stupidity, and hypocrisy?
Take the thesaurus down and tell me why you levy false accusations on people, and white knight a dumb girl that’s been told off countlessly by CH himself.
@ Amy – Jeez (don’t get offended Matt – this is only an expression. I swear I wasn’t trying to use the Lord’s name in vain!). You are a big clown. CH himself (as well as I and other commenters) have told you off in multiple recent threads, and your response is to act like a child – throw out ad hominems – and cry like a little girl by saying “Et tu, CH?” with a frowney face.
CH has told you “you are slipping, amy. please quit straying between the lines.”
I have heard you are a half-nigger. No wonder, in addition to your blockheaded capacity for learning, you have such an affinity for the tattooed blights of society, and you have done work at a prison. Funny how so much of behavior can be explained instantly by racial backgrounds, right?
@ Oh, poor RD. She still doesn’t want to stay on topic, and would rather discuss English. I don’t think you are as over that rape as you may think.
I know you are a poor little rape victim, RD, so I will go easy on you, and tell you this – you good character judge of men, you – while whistling green sleeves, to help create a good ambiance between us.
– Your very first response to Matt reeked of butthurt.
– A woman is capable of both logically knowing that a man is bad for her while simultaneously feeling attraction for him.
– Calling you what you are (a hideous creature as ugly on the inside as she is on the outside; and no I don’t mean the black lungs or tits of a 9 year old) does not imply I care about you. Or if I did care, it would be insofar as to create a more beautiful world without such execrable “women” walking on the face of the Earth.
VERDICTS:
MATT – BETA MALE. RELIGIOUS HYPOCRITE. INTELLECTUAL FRAUD. WHITE KNIGHT.
WILL DIE ALONE AFTER THE TACTIC OF “HEY AMY, I DEFENDED YOU ON THE INTERNET THAT ONE TIME SO FUCK ME” WILL NOT WORK.
AMY – ATTRACTED TO THUGS OF SOCIETY. INCAPABLE OF LEARNING. REGARDLESS STAYS IN THE CHATEAU BECAUSE SHE LIKES THE ABUSE OF BEING TOLD OFF (OBVIOUSLY; JUST LOOK AT THE HALF-NIGGER’S DATING HISTORY)
WILL DIE ALONE AFTER RIDING THE THUG COCK CAROUSEL HER ENTIRE LIFE AND DEMONSTRATING AN IQ OF A POTATO, SMV = 1 (ASSUMING NO MICE INSIDE VAGINA) OR IN A PRISON RIOT
RD – OLD HAG OF A “FEMALE” OF QUESTIONABLE ANATOMY: A-CUPS, BLACK LUNGS FROM CHAIN-SMOKING FROM YEARS, AND DEVOID OF INNANE MOTHERLY INSTINCTS IN HEALTHY WOMEN. UNABLE TO STAY ON UNCOMFORTABLE TOPICS – LIKE HER RAPE AND HER ATTRACTION TO BADBOYS – SO SHE RESORTS TO TALKING ABOUT THE FASCINATING SUBJECT OF ENGLISH SYNTAX ON A DATING BLOG. CONSTANTLY LOOKS FOR ABUSE.
WILL DIE FROM EMPHYSEMA OR GANG-RAPE AFTER A MEANINGLESS LIFE OF RIDING THE COCK CAROUSEL OF THUGS FOR AN AFTER-HOURS SPIN. WILL TALK ABOUT ENGLISH SYNTAX ON HER DEATH BAD AND ASK FOR CIGARETTES IN HER LAST BREATH. SMV = -3
(AVOIDING HER IS DIRECTLY CONDUCIVE TO MALE VIRILITY AND HAPPINESS)
Why are you trying to pose as me?
ouch. guilty on all counts. judgement is out. seems like the defendant is attempting to appeal the verdict.
Good news everyone!
I have dated tattoo’ed up felons, thugs, and badboys, but no more!
I am sick of subverting society by dating its undesirable blights. I deserve so much better with my worthless liberal arts degree from a community college.
Therefore, I am happy to announce that I am currently “dating” (he says he’ll call me sometime to hang out after we have sex) Jamal. He is 6’10 and fresh off the boat from Nigeria, and he is without a rap sheet.
Oh, and – I suppose – even if he gets thrown in prison, that’s okay! I already work there anyway interviewing the same badboys that get my pussy wet and my vulva inflamed!
You are all invited to our eventual nuptials! Just watch your wallets.
It’s okay baby, you’ll find someone. Shoot for girls with a 30+ BMI. They don’t mind a guy that’s one taco short of a combo platter, as long as you pick up a keg of Ben & Jerry’s on the way home.
Nuddah 19-year old, blonde, blue-eyed Nordic virgin – who is also a conservative Evangelical Christian with a MENSA IQ down the drain.
What is a “MENSA IQ down the drain”? You just meant “IQ down the drain” but wanted to add a little something?
Strange how some absolutely hate Germanics, and can’t wait for a chance to show it. It’s like how uneducated workers want money, so they hate anyone who has it. Everyone wants to get into Germanic-built countries, while heaping shit over Germanics. What are you, buddy? Slav, Med, Arab, Negro? Y’all look the same to me.
Sarcasm is wasted on the stupid.
As you can see, I’m 100% pure Black.
Wenn Du Dich für so ‘Germanisch’ hältst, kannst Du mich ja gerne auf Deutsch beschimpfen……
”That’s just something a girl says when she can’t handle her feelings for a man”
very good. shows stellar frame control if you can do it right. i’d say also don’t be afraid to flash a little frustration or even anger when you say it. it says “i can pass all your tests, AND i’m not gonna do this much longer”
Also, contrasts “girl” with “man”.
What if when you meet a girl for a first date you go for a hug, then feign, while yelling “spin move!”, and grapple her from behind?
Dwayne Johnson game.
> “grapple her from behind”
Whew.
Is this a blind date?
The femcunt feminazi man-hating nihiliste chicks’ll be calling up the police and having your ass hauled off to prison on assault charges.
Might wanna gauge the body language first before putting yourself at risk like that.
‘- Yard sales and consignment shops are lucrative venues for picking up girls. Good ratio + young babes + opener props = win.’
No love for the grocery store?
[CH: produce section only.]
Heartiste appealing to the Historical Documents:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0077975/
Old Man Game FTW.
For the teenagers at the Chateau:
Nice neg I used the other day:
Saw a girl, probably an 8, sitting with some guy in the hallway waiting for class to start. Looked like he may have been trying to flirt with her. I walk on by, pause and give her a little look and say, “Oh my gosh you know what?” pause for effect “My grandma has those same boots! They look… A little bit better on you though.”
Her face lit up. The other guy was flown out of the water so hard he started to scoff at me but she was hooked. It was beautiful.
She says, “Haha well… I guess your grandma has a good sense of style then.”
I reply with, “Ah yeah that must be it.”
I’ve come a long way with your help CH. Almost brought a tear to my eye. I know by her eyes that her pussy was near sex juice Mt. Vesuvius status.
“You make me think of my grandma” to a young girl can be a good neg too.
“Surely he loves his grandma that’s so sweet, but what is wrong with me???”.
Elvis Costello game.
The other night at the bar the cutest waitress was wearing one of those animal hats, I think it was the Tazmanian devil from Looney Tunes.
Anyways, she comes up to take my order.
I say ” Cool hat. ” *Alpha nod followed with a smirk* .
She says ” Thanks ! blah blah blah , blah blah ” (about how it’s always been one of her favorite characters.)
I say ” Yeah , all the kids in junior high are wearing them.”
” Jerk ! ” she says, followed with a little arm punch.
Smile at every woman on the street? What happened to the badass alpha that doesn’t move farther than a smirk?
Perhaps you ment “carry yourself with confidence, an air of satisfaction about yourself and pride”, which in turn gives you a cocky-you are all such silly bunnies-smile
Yeah, pure unadulterated Alpha game says:
“Smile if you wanna smile, frown if you wanna frown, stoneface if you wanna stoneface, it’s all good.”
“Hug if you wanna hug, run away if you wanna run away, shake hands if you wanna shake hands, it’s all good.”
Etc etc etc…
But in fairness to Heartiste, he’s giving specific examples of these approaches, not the general principle.
They do what they wanna do, say what they wanna say
Live how they wanna live, play how they wanna play
Dance how they wanna dance, kick and the slap a friend
The addams family
Speakin’ and thinkin’ about the addams
You know the hammer is with it (I’m with it)
Act a fool, no bones, swooop, goofy and randy
You know we kick it (the posse)
Now is the time to get in your mind
It’s ok to be yourself (be yourself)
Take foolish pride and put it aside
Like the addams, yo! they def (that’s a family!)
Since the only women I’m likely to see (walking) on streets around here are either homeless, toothless alcoholics or 40+ roly-poly Mexican multiple mothers (Single or otherwise) or <16 school girls, I’m gonna give that advice a wide berth.
another list to recite to myself every half hour, keep em comin CH …….
Don’t be afraid to try a bridal show. Besides the brides, there are single sisters and bored bridemaids. They’ll appreciate your confidence and big cajones coming onto “their turf”. I was asked: “lemme get this straight: you came here to hit on girls?” Me: “yes. Exactly.” Her: “gimme your phone, I’ll give you my number.”
Wedding Crashers game.
I’ve had success at maternity shops too. You hit on the friends who are giving advice. Bonus points are earned when there’s at least one woman carrying your baby in the shop too.
> “at least one woman carrying your baby”
LOL’ed.
Polygany Game FTW.
n = m
“After sex, or before if you like risk, tell girl “I’m not interested in a relationship with anyone.” Money-saving MOAB game.””
Ouch. How is this day game if you say it after sex?? It’s “get lost” game.
MOAB = Mother of All Bombs?
Massive Ordnance Air Blast.
I don’t know whether to be impressed or disturbed by the fact that you knew that.
Really? I thought that was common knowledge. You used to see it in the news a lot, right when we first invaded Afghanistan.
It’s also a fun way to describe a truly cataclysmic fart. “I got on the elevator this morning just as one of the contractors was getting off, and walked right into this MOAB he’d obviously just laid.”
She’s got the clit-dick thing going on along with being a gun toting conservative, so….. not all that surprising actually.
Actually, Jay, anatomically I’m really quite normal-looking. Physically, the LDR expresses itself in my ringfingers and the squareness of my jaw. And most people don’t really notice that. You might, because you’ve been sensitized to it.
The gun-toting conservative thing I’ll cop to, happily. I’m really more libertarian-leaning on social issues like gay marriage, etc., but I generally wind up voting for conservatives because I see the social issues as less important than fiscal/national security ones.
You should be disturbed, Heywood.
I am inclined to believe what Jay wrote below about this unfeminine masculinized gun-using shemale’s clit dick; except, I don’t even think she has a clit.
We have already established the fact that she is an old chain-smoking hag, as flat as a Chinese boy, that has taken a thug version of the cock-carousel for an after-hours spin her entire life. I imagine her to live in deep Alabama, missing half of her teeth due to infectious gingivitis.
The fact that you continuously put yourself in bad situations, by spreading your legs for abusive assholes, lead us to believe that you were complicit in the “abuse” you suffered. Doesn’t that make you feel better?
Oh, and when truth is pointed out – like, for example, that I am not contradicting myself when I say that you are turned on by thugs emotionally even when you logically know that they are bad for you or calling you what you are doesn’t mean I care about you – what do you do about it? Get butthurt, change the topic, and want to talk about English instead, like a poor little scared girl.
(This is only a metaphor, of course; you are an old chain-smoking harpy with a shriveled-up body from the years of having all of your orifices pounded by bad-boys).
In fact, you have never faced me directly, out of my numerous responses. Do I frighten you? Do you have nothing better than quivering and inanely sputtering out red-herrings (that don’t even make sense in and of themselves)?
How come that even with the most masculine of women – like you – you still have that same self-deluding solipsistic little hamster that’ll do anything to avoid uncomfortable topics?
The sad part is you can’t even change the topic effectively. For example, you try to criticize my English when you make even more egregious errors by capitalizing wrong words, making up words (like “ragegasming”), and contradicting yourself by proclaiming that a word like ‘eviscerate’ only has a singular meaning while subsequently giving the word’s alternate meaning.
And of course one of your more recent comments show you are, again, in complete ignorance. How long have you been here sweetheart? Probably long enough to know how the comment box works, right?
Here is my reply to you again, reposted, after you accused me of being Patrice:
—–
Oh yes, obviously I am Patrice. Truly I fucked up by writing on my *real* identity. You got me, genius!
And look, now I must be RappaccinisDaughter. I mean, that’s what my name says!
Since I am the Chateau’s resident old bitter transsexual harpy, I will take this opportunity to make a BIG ANNOUNCEMENT:
I wanted to let you all know that aside from being an old shriveled up chain-smoking unfeminine whore, as flat as a wall, devoid of motherly instincts, that had ridden the cock carousel her *entire* life to rapidly enter spinsterhood – one supplied by blights of society like thugs and badboys – that is too dishonest and hurt to stay on topic (about your attraction to badboys and your little rape incident; but hey at least you didn’t talk about English this time), I have another wonderful quality to share with the world….
I AM A DUMBASS THAT HAS NO IDEA HOW COMMENTING WORKS!
RD, I never thought you could fail any more – both here and in your personal life – but you continue to aggressively push the envelope and prove me wrong.
Your last sentence talking about ME failing (considering your ignorance, cowardice in avoidance of topics where you were proven wrong, lack of physical and mental health, and the fact you are an old shriveled-up deranged prune with black lungs and small tits that constantly puts Chris Browns in her life in order to suck thug cock and get abused) is DELICIOUSLY ironic. Kudos for being my puppet!
Looks like you don’t recognize the “tells” in my writing as well as you had mentioned before, right sweetheart? But that’s okay – we have already established you are solipsistic and delusional about your own capabilities, and you obscure and change the topic to avoid further embarrassment. Does the rape still hurt sweetie?
Please reply talking again about English, avoiding the topic, and make another dumb remark. I don’t expect you to have the willpower to confront me directly. Hurry!
You are good cheap entertainment. It is rare to see a creature fail so much.
I know, this is so shocking to me; I expected so much from a dumbass chain-smoking shemale that had ridden thug cock her entire life. You sound like such quality in a woman.
I will send you a box of cats to accompany you during your spinsterhood as a reward for my amusement.
———–
Sweetheart, where is my response? I am – at this point – just documenting your seemingly endless odious behavior.
P.S. I am not surprised to hear you wear typical masculine fragrances like musk and gourmands; it goes along with your other deliciously feminine features, like A-cups, black lungs, gun ownership, penis, and lack of healthy feminine motherly instincts.
And then you described one of your “relationships” and you sounded like such an unfeminine, boring, sourpuss. Who would’ve guessed it from such an old deranged used-up harpy such as yourself, right?
The Chateau is the polar anti-thesis of your very mind, body, and soul, old carousel-riding solipsistic unfeminine whore. But you can make amends with us by leaving its hallowed doors forever, and accept your fate.
http://badgerhut.wordpress.com/2013/11/21/throttle-the-number-of-words-you-use/
Hey CH, my last reply to this twerp is apparently “in moderation.” But apparently he really, really, really wants to hear it.
Yes, darling heart, I’m an A cup, I smoke, I don’t want kids, and I can shoot the ass off a housefly at 40 yards with my .45 and 300 with my .223. I drink my Scotch neat, I tell dirty jokes, and you could crack a walnut with my jaw.
And yet…just like every other woman you’ve encountered in your 30 years on this planet…I still won’t sleep with you.
That’s gotta sting.
And yes, I’ve had to learn some ugly lessons, and I’ve had to learn them the hard way. Yet I’m not bitter about men, or afraid of them. I form rich, mutually satisfying relationships with them that encompass the gamut from casual buddy, to good friend, to lover. I don’t hold the vast majority of men who have never harmed me responsible for the actions of two guys.
So what’s your excuse?
Tldr
tl;dr
Thanks (and thanks for responding on the other thread). I still don’t get why it’s day game vs. launch game.
Gold Jerry!! Gold!
Tweet: ” Colognes and perfumes are really meant to disguise MHC scents so that one’s field of possible mates is enlarged.”
That’s a pretty strong theory. It’s something I’ve often wondered about myself.
Although that could certainly explain the driving forces behind the behavior, unfortunately for many people, it’s either not helping or it’s actively counterproductive. The problem is that most of us pick out our own scents to use, so we’re choosing what smells good *to us,* not necessarily what’s going to smell good to the people that we’re trying to attract. Also, not necessarily what’s going to mix well with our own body chemistry.
It’s a strong argument for only wearing cologne that women pick out for you (if you’re a man, naturally), or for not wearing it at all.
MHC ???
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=MHC
Major Histocompatibility Complex. Has to do with how two people’s immune systems mesh. Kids are healthier with less chance of miscarriage if there is harmony in a couple’s MHC profiles. Also more attraction and hotter monkey sex.
Would you mind copying and pasting and uploading what you just wrote as the official first definition at UD?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=MHC
The Manosphere & The Dark Enlightenment thank you in advance.
The current theory is that MHC is what makes a person smell good or bad to you. It’s a particularly important component of attraction to women, because our senses of smell are demonstrably more acute than those of men. CH’s musing is that the use of cologne and other scented products is a subconscious way to obscure your MHC “smell,” so you won’t be automatically disqualified by a certain percentage of women.
[CH: the hypothesis applies to women who use perfume, as well.]
The other part of MHC theory that you’ll find interesting, ZS, is that a woman’s reaction to it is affected by the Pill. When she’s on the Pill, she’s more likely to respond to MHC that is similar to her own (e.g., a person who smells like a family member). The prevailing theory as to why this is is that the Pill mimics the effects of pregnancy.
@CH: Oh yeah, I figured you meant that, too. And men do seem to respond to perfume, but they don’t seem to like the kinds that women prefer. Men seem to hate, hate, hate really strong, floral perfume and woodsy scents. I’ve gotten a lot more traction with perfume that smells of musk and…get this…food.
I have one that smells of butterscotch and whisky from BPAL that I, personally, loathe. It actually makes me kind of nauseous to wear. But I get all these compliments from men, so…
[CH: tbh, i’m a sucker for light, fresh, springtime meadow perfumes (on a beautiful baby of course). but i suspect perfume use is down, because i hardly smell it on women anymore. chalk it up to the increasing de-feminization of the West. however, black women buck the trend, because i can’t avoid smelling them when they’re within a mile radius of me. they must take a bath in it, and the stuff they use is strong enough to scorch nasal passages and tear up the eyes. revolting shit. i gotta wonder who they think likes them smelling that way? black men, i guess.]
@CH: Actually, probably part of what you’re seeing with the decrease in perfume use among women is that there’s been a movement among a number of workplaces to ban the use of perfume. Apparently enough people are “allergic” (use of scarequotes deliberate, as I doubt that most of them are truly allergic) that many HR departments have banned them wholesale rather than deal with complaints. She can’t wear perfume to work, so she falls out of the habit of wearing it at all.
I think it’s more about the pussification of America than defeminization, frankly.YMMV.
[CH: workplace banning of perfume use is both one cause and one symptom of the de-feminization of first world Western nations. Everything is getting desexualized in the push for total equalism, and more women in the workplace means more cattiness and backbiting and sly attempts to reduce the allure of female sexual competitors.]
“I’ve gotten a lot more traction with perfume that smells of musk and…get this…food.”
I’ve read that men have the food scent preference, and I think strawberries allegedly topped the list. My ex went nuts for the coconut smell. I always thought men hated really strong perfumes in any scent, but “strong” is a matter of opinion. I like scented lotion; it’s enough to notice but not enough to knock someone out.
There’s an extremely vulgar little factoid about life as a man here, but I don’t feel comfortable talking about it with chicks in the room.
I think we can take it, ZS. Let’s have it!
If I were to smell your pussy, ass, or armpits I could tell if you were rh- blood type or not.
That’s wild, Mr. B. What aspect of the smell is it that clues you in, and how did you figure out you could do it?
(I can smell diabetes and chemotherapy, incidentally, although I don’t have to get quite so…up close and personal…to do it. Just breath and/or sweat is plenty.)
Mr. B just hinted at it.
Some chicks just don’t smell very good.
In fact, they smell down right revolting.
… and revolting smelling chicks smell particularly revolting when they are menstruating.
… and revolting smelling chicks smell particularly revolting when they are menstruating.
Damn skippy they do. I’m married to one, too. She used to smell good. I couldn’t get enough of her scent. I don’t know what happened, but she smells awful on a good day, and you add some period pussy to that, and the only way to cope is to get too wasted to care.
Since I am the Chateau’s resident old bitter transsexual harpy, I will take this opportunity to make a BIG ANNOUNCEMENT:
I wanted to let you all know that aside from being an old shriveled up chain-smoking unfeminine whore, as flat as a wall, devoid of motherly instincts, that had ridden the cock carousel her *entire* life to rapidly enter spinsterhood – one supplied by blights of society like thugs and badboys – that is too dishonest and hurt to stay on topic (about your attraction to badboys and your little rape incident; but hey at least you didn’t talk about English this time), I have another wonderful quality to share with the world….
I AM A DUMBASS THAT HAS NO IDEA HOW COMMENTING WORKS!
RD, I never thought you could fail any more – both here and in your personal life – but you continue to aggressively push the envelope and prove me wrong.
Your last sentence talking about ME failing (considering your ignorance, cowardice in avoidance of topics where you were proven wrong, lack of physical and mental health, and the fact you are an old shriveled-up deranged prune with black lungs and small tits that constantly puts Chris Browns in her life in order to suck thug cock and get abused) is DELICIOUSLY ironic. Kudos for being my puppet!
Looks like you don’t recognize the “tells” in my writing as well as you had mentioned before, right sweetheart? But that’s okay – we have already established that you are solipsistic and delusional about your own capabilities, and you obscure and change the topic to avoid further embarrassment. Does the rape still hurt sweetie?
Please reply talking again about English, avoiding the topic, and make another dumb remark. I don’t expect you to have the willpower to confront me directly. Hurry!
You are good cheap entertainment. It is rare to see a creature fail so much.
I know, this is so shocking to me; I expected so much from a dumbass chain-smoking shemale that had ridden thug cock her entire life. You sound like such quality in a woman.
I will send you a box of cats to accompany you during your spinsterhood as a reward for my amusement.
P.S. If you want to criticize my English – in a thinly veiled attempt to save face and change the topic after being corrected about your fallacious remarks – you can at least be correct and not make up words, or contradict yourself by saying a word only has one meaning and then giving an alternate meaning.
Whoever you are, I fucking salute you.
Keep it up, man. Keep it up….
I never wear cologne.
I guess it’s lucky for me that my current main likes to bury her nose in my armpit and inhale deeply. Previously I found it weird , now I think it’s comforting.
Smiling at every woman you pass on the street is quite possibly the best advice on the list. For one, it brightens your day, ‘If I’m smiling so much I must be happy!’ your brain tells itself. For two, it makes it that much easier to go up to women and talk to them, as you are out of your shell and expect smiles from them.
Plus spreading positivity around is good Karma.
I have three things to add.
I like the “Kanye West” response. I was getting back in touch with a girl i met over the summer. She pulle the “who is this?” routine. I said “derek jeter. wanna fuck?” i dunno why, it just popped in my head. Either she pretended to not understand or literally had no idea who that was. BUt it made me realize there is a new generation behind me. Funny. Possibly instructive to others..keep it relevant.
When she talks about another man. Bingo. One girl was going on about some guy and i just shut it down with “whaddya paying me by the hour?”. End thread, (plus a”shut up!!” with a giggle.)
Lastly mints all good. But hydrogen peroxide is your best friend. like 3 bucks a bottle at the store. Rinse with a bit of water…you will have a completely odorless mouth. Btw has anyone else noticed girls with fucked up breath being an epidemic? No negative social feedback from guys is the culprot…ill bet. I’ve made a girl rinse with that shit. Breath wasnt bad the next time! #Shameworks
> “girls with fucked up breath”
Chicks who smell bad: Serious DNFW.
Btw has anyone else noticed girls with fucked up breath being an epidemic?
they have poor oral hygiene or they’re bulimic.
I know girls and guys who eat out all the time and always get the tripple fried double basted garlic and chive delight. They stink in a way that no amount of peroxide will handle.
Unless your carefull, every friggn thing you get while eating out makes you stink for days. You can brush, floss, and power wash. Nothing takes the stink away but time. Like many of the topics covered on this blog, its a rot that comes from the inside.
> “garlic and chive”
BLECCH.
Of course, it could be a good opportunity to try your hand at “Call ‘Em Out On It” Game: “Honey, I’d love to french kiss you on the first date, but dadgum, you gotta do something about that breath first.”
Bad diets, not enough exercise also make chicks smell bad from every orifice. I’ve nexted several attractive women due to bad odors in various places.
If garlic is so bad, one cannot help but wonder why so many women find Italians, Greeks or Spaniards ‘sexy’.
They tend to consume rather vast quantities of onions, garlic and all manner of other strong smelling stuff.
I’ve never noticed any correlation whatsoever between body odor and attraction, in fact, most chicks seem to dig some man sweat and don’t care one rat’s ass about which cologne (if any) you wear.
As long as you don’t stink like the homeless bum who’s been sleeping in a dumpster next to the exhaust vent from the sewage treatment plant for the past 3 months, pissing his unchanged pants daily, your smell is NOT the reason why she rejects you.
Would love an example of date-starting, “touching on your terms” but no hug.
On first dates I always go for a hug, even if they put they’re hand out, I’m just like, “nope, I’m bringin it in,” and brush their hand out of the way as I grab ‘em. I enjoy doing this, and it’s def on my terms, sets a dominant frame, etc.
– If you go out a lot, you will have make-outs. Fresh breath extends sessions. Tip: chew mint leaves on your way out the door.
What about Bad Breath Game? Before you kiss her you openly, confidently, and indifferently wonder if your breath smells just in case it kind of does (even though it never should).
It signals to her that you don’t give a fuck, and I’ve seen alphas with sketchy hygiene keep hot women who supposedly value “good hygiene”.
i kind of agree with this. a minty mouth means “i have been thinking of kissing you and have planned ahead.” a non-foul, neutral mouth is not a hard thing to maintain.
A clean minty mouth can be beta. A neutral or even admittedly bad mouth with an IDGAF attitude is alpha.
Same reason why dutch ovens are more alpha than never farting in front your chick.
I’ve seen alphas with semi-chronic BO have hot uber-hygienic girlfriends.
Great list- not much new but good summary/remidners. “Cast game” a little high-schoolish, though- I can’t imagine a grown man collecting female smiley faces on a cast.
“When a hot chick makes a funny…”
does this ever happen? not laugh-out-loud, at least for me.
Ubercreepy Cast Game:
“Hey can you help me with these books? I have a broken arm and this cast is making it difficult. My car’s just down the street”.
Then you walk up to your yellow Volkswagen Beetle.
FYI, don’t actually do this, it’s creepy for many reasons.
This would be so much better with a utility van.
I was thinking the same thing. And tell her you need help lifting a couch into said van. And could she get into the van and pull her end in? Then club her over the head with the cast and drive away. Success!
First you gotta ask her if she’s about a size 14.
You guys didn’t get the creepy reference.
An infamous man once tried his own version of “Cast Game” to pick up girls, and it involved a fake injury, needing help carrying his books to his car “nearby”, and a yellow Volkswagen Beetle…
Guess the reference.
http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Bundy
yep
What if it had been a great big honkin Ford Pickup Truck?
With Confederate Flag bumper stickers FTW?
The big problem there would be that no self-respecting Johnny Reb would ever be caught dead in public asking a woman to carry something for him.
All of his ancestors would simultaneously roll over in their graves if that were to happen.
P,
Don’t feed da hamsters? And “creepy”?!?? That’s like wow … just … wow!
Mildly unrelated, but is it fair to say that a man that knows exactly what he is doing with women can be a woman’s worst nightmare but at the same thing the best thing to ever happen to her?
This is true.
lmao @ the beard pet. i havent shaved for most of november i am rocking full transient/hobo beard replete with neck beard hair down around the adams apple. alpha is not giving two fucks about my appearance in pandering to what females like– and still getting laid.
chateau heartiste: come for the game, stay for the nooses
Off-topic, but I’m sure some folk out there are unhappy…
“Morning After Pill Touted by Liberals Doesn’t Work for Women Over 176 Pounds,” by Nichole Bailey, Townhall, 25 Nov 2013
I’d hope that being over 176 lbs is birth control.
The one I use all the time is “Behave…” works in a lot of situations…
http://www.onepeoplesproject.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=947:kevin-macdonald&catid=13:m&Itemid=3
In short based on what Mehler and Lieberman has shown over a decade ago by going back and checking MacDonald’s own sources word-for-word with what MacDonald himself has written word-for word, MacDonald lied about what his sources said. That’s falsification of evidence and universities are supposed to punish faculty when they do that. Sadly, it is not always punished when it should be.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_B._MacDonald#Academic_criticism
MacDonald has particularly been accused by other academics of academic fraud, saying that he has promoted anti-Semitic propaganda under the guise of what he says is a legitimate and academic search for truth.[26] He has also been accused of misrepresenting the sources he uses in that regard. Fenris State University professor Dr. Barry Mehler cited for example a quote from a 1969 dissertation by Sheldon Morris Neuringer titled American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953 where MacDonald surmised that when Neuringer noted Jewish opposition in 1921 and 1924 to the anti-immigration legislation at the time was due more to it having the “taint of discrimination and anti-Semitism” as opposed to how it would limit Jewish immigration, MacDonald wrote, “…Jewish opposition to the 1921 and 1924 legislation was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry.” “It seems to me Mr. MacDonald is misrepresenting Mr. Neuringer in this case and I posted my query hoping that a historian familiar with the literature might have a judgment on MacDonald’s use of the historical data,” Mehler wrote, citing other examples.[27]
Reviewing MacDonald’s Separation and Its Discontents in 2000, Zev Garber writes that MacDonald works from the assumption that the dual Torah is the blueprint of the eventual Jewish dominion over the world, and that he sees contemporary antisemitism, the Holocaust, and attacks against Israel as “provoked by Jews themselves.” Garber concludes that MacDonald’s “rambling who-is-who-isn’t roundup of Jews responsible for the ‘Jewish Problem’ borders on the irrational and is conducive to misrepresentation.”[28]
In 2001, David Lieberman, a Holocaust researcher at Brandeis University, wrote a paper entitled Scholarship as an Exercise in Rhetorical Strategy: A Case Study of Kevin MacDonald’s Research Techniques, where he noted how one of MacDonald’s sources, author Jaff Schatz, objected to how MacDonald used his writings to further his premise that Jewish self-identity validates anti-Semitic sentiments and actions. “At issue, however, is not the quality of Schatz’s research, but MacDonald’s use of it, a discussion that relies less on topical expertise than on a willingness to conduct close comparative readings,” Lieberman wrote.[29]
Lieberman has also written that MacDonald even dishonestly made up lines from the work of British Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving’s Uprising which was published in 1981 for the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hungary’s failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the Culture of Critique, “The domination of the Hungarian communist Jewish bureaucracy thus appears to have had overtones of sexual and reproductive domination of gentiles in which Jewish males were able to have disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.” Lieberman, who also noted that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding, “(T)he passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, “Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.”[30]
http://www.onepeoplesproject.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=947:kevin-macdonald&catid=13:m&Itemid=3
In short based on what Mehler and Lieberman has shown over a decade ago by going back and checking MacDonald’s own sources word-for-word with what MacDonald himself has written word-for word, MacDonald lied about what his sources said. That’s falsification of evidence and universities are supposed to punish faculty when they do that. Sadly, it is not always punished when it should be.
Tell it to Stephen Jay Gould.
Would be so cool if you got like me and posted pics of your butt and stuff when you didn’t have time to write something new.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_B._MacDonald
MacDonald has particularly been accused by other academics of academic fraud, saying that he has promoted anti-Semitic propaganda under the guise of what he says is a legitimate and academic search for truth.[26] He has also been accused of misrepresenting the sources he uses in that regard. Fenris State University professor Dr. Barry Mehler cited for example a quote from a 1969 dissertation by Sheldon Morris Neuringer titled American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953 where MacDonald surmised that when Neuringer noted Jewish opposition in 1921 and 1924 to the anti-immigration legislation at the time was due more to it having the “taint of discrimination and anti-Semitism” as opposed to how it would limit Jewish immigration, MacDonald wrote, “…Jewish opposition to the 1921 and 1924 legislation was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry.” “It seems to me Mr. MacDonald is misrepresenting Mr. Neuringer in this case and I posted my query hoping that a historian familiar with the literature might have a judgment on MacDonald’s use of the historical data,” Mehler wrote, citing other examples.[27]
Reviewing MacDonald’s Separation and Its Discontents in 2000, Zev Garber writes that MacDonald works from the assumption that the dual Torah is the blueprint of the eventual Jewish dominion over the world, and that he sees contemporary antisemitism, the Holocaust, and attacks against Israel as “provoked by Jews themselves.” Garber concludes that MacDonald’s “rambling who-is-who-isn’t roundup of Jews responsible for the ‘Jewish Problem’ borders on the irrational and is conducive to misrepresentation.”[28]
In 2001, David Lieberman, a Holocaust researcher at Brandeis University, wrote a paper entitled Scholarship as an Exercise in Rhetorical Strategy: A Case Study of Kevin MacDonald’s Research Techniques, where he noted how one of MacDonald’s sources, author Jaff Schatz, objected to how MacDonald used his writings to further his premise that Jewish self-identity validates anti-Semitic sentiments and actions. “At issue, however, is not the quality of Schatz’s research, but MacDonald’s use of it, a discussion that relies less on topical expertise than on a willingness to conduct close comparative readings,” Lieberman wrote.[29]
Lieberman has also written that MacDonald even dishonestly made up lines from the work of British Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving’s Uprising which was published in 1981 for the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hungary’s failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the Culture of Critique, “The domination of the Hungarian communist Jewish bureaucracy thus appears to have had overtones of sexual and reproductive domination of gentiles in which Jewish males were able to have disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.” Lieberman, who also noted that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding, “(T)he passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, “Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.”[30]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_B._MacDonald
MacDonald has particularly been accused by other academics of academic fraud, saying that he has promoted anti-Semitic propaganda under the guise of what he says is a legitimate and academic search for truth.[26] He has also been accused of misrepresenting the sources he uses in that regard. Fenris State University professor Dr. Barry Mehler cited for example a quote from a 1969 dissertation by Sheldon Morris Neuringer titled American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953 where MacDonald surmised that when Neuringer noted Jewish opposition in 1921 and 1924 to the anti-immigration legislation at the time was due more to it having the “taint of discrimination and anti-Semitism” as opposed to how it would limit Jewish immigration, MacDonald wrote, “…Jewish opposition to the 1921 and 1924 legislation was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry.” “It seems to me Mr. MacDonald is misrepresenting Mr. Neuringer in this case and I posted my query hoping that a historian familiar with the literature might have a judgment on MacDonald’s use of the historical data,” Mehler wrote, citing other examples.[27]
Reviewing MacDonald’s Separation and Its Discontents in 2000, Zev Garber writes that MacDonald works from the assumption that the dual Torah is the blueprint of the eventual Jewish dominion over the world, and that he sees contemporary antisemitism, the Holocaust, and attacks against Israel as “provoked by Jews themselves.” Garber concludes that MacDonald’s “rambling who-is-who-isn’t roundup of Jews responsible for the ‘Jewish Problem’ borders on the irrational and is conducive to misrepresentation.”[28]
In 2001, David Lieberman, a Holocaust researcher at Brandeis University, wrote a paper entitled Scholarship as an Exercise in Rhetorical Strategy: A Case Study of Kevin MacDonald’s Research Techniques, where he noted how one of MacDonald’s sources, author Jaff Schatz, objected to how MacDonald used his writings to further his premise that Jewish self-identity validates anti-Semitic sentiments and actions. “At issue, however, is not the quality of Schatz’s research, but MacDonald’s use of it, a discussion that relies less on topical expertise than on a willingness to conduct close comparative readings,” Lieberman wrote.[29]
Lieberman has also written that MacDonald even dishonestly made up lines from the work of British Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving’s Uprising which was published in 1981 for the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hungary’s failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the Culture of Critique, “The domination of the Hungarian communist Jewish bureaucracy thus appears to have had overtones of sexual and reproductive domination of gentiles in which Jewish males were able to have disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.” Lieberman, who also noted that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding, “(T)he passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, “Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.”[30]
MacDonald has particularly been accused by other academics of academic fraud, saying that he has promoted anti-Semitic propaganda under the guise of what he says is a legitimate and academic search for truth.[26] He has also been accused of misrepresenting the sources he uses in that regard. Fenris State University professor Dr. Barry Mehler cited for example a quote from a 1969 dissertation by Sheldon Morris Neuringer titled American Jewry and United States immigration policy, 1881-1953 where MacDonald surmised that when Neuringer noted Jewish opposition in 1921 and 1924 to the anti-immigration legislation at the time was due more to it having the “taint of discrimination and anti-Semitism” as opposed to how it would limit Jewish immigration, MacDonald wrote, “…Jewish opposition to the 1921 and 1924 legislation was motivated less by a desire for higher levels of Jewish immigration than by opposition to the implicit theory that America should be dominated by individuals with northern and western European ancestry.” “It seems to me Mr. MacDonald is misrepresenting Mr. Neuringer in this case and I posted my query hoping that a historian familiar with the literature might have a judgment on MacDonald’s use of the historical data,” Mehler wrote, citing other examples.[27]
Eh, Jews make up completely fictional disproofs of their opponents all the time. They’re not fooling anyone who matters.
Lieberman has also written that MacDonald even dishonestly made up lines from the work of British Holocaust denier David Irving. Citing Irving’s Uprising which was published in 1981 for the twenty-fifth anniversary of Hungary’s failed anti-Communist revolution in 1956, MacDonald asserted in the Culture of Critique, “The domination of the Hungarian communist Jewish bureaucracy thus appears to have had overtones of sexual and reproductive domination of gentiles in which Jewish males were able to have disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.” Lieberman, who also noted that MacDonald is not a historian, debunked those assertions, concluding, “(T)he passage offers not a shred of evidence that, as MacDonald would have it, “Jewish males enjoyed disproportionate sexual access to gentile females.”[30]
hey CH why do you retweet roosh if he is a turk taking all yer white wimmenz
So are implying that KMAC is being protected ny the all-powerful (and anti-Semitic) WASP-Muslim ruling class? What a joke.
i had the same problem like many of the women that answered. i am from the island of Trinidad and Tobago.And growing up in my country i was exposed to Indian culture w Indian movies on the tv station. Even the Hindu festival Diwali is big in Trinidad.my experience was here in NYC. i met this Indian he was nice started to date . we got to know each other month become into a year. between months we had a very intimate relationship. we talked about marriage, future everything in the long run.we never fought never had any difficulties relationship was going well. then one day he called and told me some kakame story that his ex- girlfriend from south Africa (south African Indian girl) is coming back and he decide to marry her instead. he actually told me all this on the phone.i liked and accepted him for his personalities and even when he claimed he wasn’t working.but instead i got really hurt.i cried for weeks trying to figure out what went wrong.my family and friends warned we about Indian men but i didn’t listen.they said that he probably had a wife and didn’t want her to find out about me. or didnt want to get to deeply involve because at the end of the day it goes back to his Indian beauty. I’m turn off but not completely by the experience to shut all Indian away. I think the next time i would be very terrified and hesitant to go with a next Indian man that comes along. because of that horrific experience.
I was having dinner with my gf, her sister, and her feminist friend. We were talking about Forrest Gump, and someone mentioned Jenny made a lot of bad choices. “Bad choices?” I asked. “She didn’t love Forrest until he became a multi-millionaire.”
The feminist sneered. “That’s a man’s thinking.”
“The only reason she reached out to him is because he was rich and she needed someone to raise their child. If it was even his.”
Again, she just shook her head and sad, “That’s a typical man’s thinking.”
I immediately responded, “Well, that response was short and elegant. Like a midget in a ball gown.”
My gf and her sister tried not to laugh at that, but they couldn’t resist. If the feminist has a dog, she kicked it later that night.
Can anyone recommend any good PUA books for guys who go out alone?
I’m reading Mystery Method and so far his methods seem to involve the help of a wingman or a group of friends.
You can’t create false time restraints (for example: i can only stay a sec my friends are waiting) if you’re at the club by yourself.
Credit to YaReally:
Ya, RSD’s video articles are great, specifically Tyler’s. Watch his
whole archive of videos for a bunch of great stuff. His work is pretty
much head of the pack in terms of progressing pickup as an art-form.
Same time though, I got into the community in the old-school heavy
tactics days and I think having a grounding in the old-school stuff
underneath all the new “be shapeless like water” stuff helps a lot.
Mystery Method was solid gold, but it’s a looooong read/watch. If you
can handle that, great, but if not then I’d recommend LoveSystem’s
“Magic Bullets” which is like a really condensed “only the important
stuff” version of MM.
Paul Janka’s “How to get laid in New York” is a good read (free PDF
file) just to get a different perspective (he’s a natural and he does
day-game in a really busy fast-paced city, he has some interesting
takes on how he games).
If you Google you can find “The Tyler Digest”, but I’d actually
recommend this one instead or as well:
http://www.dallaspua.com/files/mystery_method_collaboration_11.08.06.pdf
Thank you
Feds have decided to shut down 23andMe — that’s the company that’ll do genetics workups if you send them a sample.
Were too many men finding out about the paternity of their kids?
Or were too many potential Obamacare clients checking to see if they had risk factors before deciding to sign up?
Either way, apparently the Democrats have decided you shouldn’t know about your own genes.
This will only stop when we kill them all.
[…] – Yard sales and consignment shops are lucrative venues for picking up girls. Good ratio + young babes + opener props = win. – When a hot chick makes a funny, don’t laugh too hard. In fact, don’t laugh at all. […]
I just wanted to say I love this blog for another reason too; the english I’m learning. CH has a way of throwing in unusual words that a european like me have to look up to really get the sentence. Ah, good stuff, getting educated here even. Maybe CH should get some tax-money for the educational value haha.