Ah women… saintly creatures. The fairer sex. Daddies’ little princesses. And also more likely than men to be homewreckers.
Do women prefer men who are attached?
“Everything was the same across all participants, except whether their ideal mate was already attached or not,” says Burkley.
The most striking result was in the responses of single women. Offered a single man, 59 per cent were interested in pursuing a relationship. But when he was attached, 90 per cent said they were up for the chase.
Men were keenest on pursuing new mates, but weren’t bothered whether their target was already attached or not.
This shouldn’t be news to veteran readers of CH. We of the illuminati already knew, from years toiling in the field, getting our dicks dirty, that women:
1. love to CHASE CHASE CHASE aloof men who aren’t readily available
2. love preselected men other women love, and
3. love the drama that necessarily accompanies stealing a validated man from his girlfriend or wife.
Really, if feminists were smart (asking a lot, I know), they’d realize their worst enemies aren’t laser-guided ego-targeting truth bombers like yours truly, but other women who will claw, scratch and passive-aggressively sabotage their way over the messed tresses of their sexual market competitors. Politically, women may be a united front, but privately they are at each other’s throats. And they attack with their knives sheathed, plausible deniability and rationalizing hamsters their greatest allies in this total war of gene delivery vessels, which makes them all the more potent adversaries.
So buying a wedding band and wearing it out is the Game technique that gives a massive boost in DHV? Good to know…
[Heartiste: Yes. But the boost in DHV may be outweighed by the wife’s allies in the divorce industrial complex.]
@Heartiste,
Wedding bands are cheap and you don’t need a wife to get or wear one. It also gives you an ever better excuse why you can’t take her back to your place…
Depends if you get a real one or not.
I bet you are can get a discount one at a pawn shop…
Has wearing a wedding ring actually helped any of you guys?
Personally, I think that two of the grandest lies that women tell is that wearing a wedding ring will get you attention and that carrying a baby will get you attention.
I never noticed any different level of attention between wearing a wedding ring and not.
And, when I have carried a baby it felt like I might as well be a table. Women do notice that you have a baby but all the attention is directed to the baby (not that it’s necessarily a bad thing to have a chick magnet in your hands).
It’s not about “baby” per se but “your baby”. At least if you want direct attention. I’ve got strong genetics that have manifested themselves in my children and so when we all go out to the store (Walmart is particularly “bad”) I frequently find myself being touched by random women. A firm pressure on my shoulder accompanied by an “OMG! Are they TWINS?!?” typically happens at least once if I happen to be out with the kids alone. I would also say that if you want to use “wedding ring game,” it’s far more effective to wear the ring on a chain around your neck and toy with it while talking to the target. Women can’t help but ask about it and then you go with, “Well, *sigh* I was married once…” and off you go.
Kids get you a lot of attention but only when people see them as cute. It’s happened to me more often than I care to count: the women see the adorable creature and then start checking me up “Hmm now. OK, I see where the angel’s traits came from…” End result is a beaming smile at me and glances afterwards.
Or you go out in a mall or a restaurant with, say four boys (your kids and their buddies), you can see the women’s thoughts on their faces:
“He’s there with four sons. Wonder where’s the mother? He seems to be getting along really well with them boys, if my fifteen minutes of constant watching can tell. I’m gonna go out of my way to make him talk to me, no matter how small a convo. Who knows, he might be a widower looking for a healing fuck if the opportunity knocks. Uh, he looked my way. Wanna make a fifth boy right here?”.
I often amuse myself by playing a game of avoidance when I detect a woman’s radar locked on me. I turn my head away and change my course on the supermarket aisle suddenly right before she opens her mouth. Just to make it more difficult for women to start talking. It’s funny how many of them hunt you down again just to say something or catch your eye and smile.
On the ring thing I am not quite sure. At least it doesn’t scare women off when they have decided they want you. I’ve never hidden my ring, and women have offered sex anyway, fully aware of it. Whether it adds to the initial attraction I don’t know.
Yes. They are a DHV and a techinque. I winged for a friend that had 5 rings on his hand. Girls instantly started asking about that.
1. Get a cheap wedding band.
2. Go to ANY east-Texas bar on a Friday or Saturday night.
3. Sit quietly at the corner of the bar, drinking beer and thinking deep thoughts.
4. Try not to DROWN in the sea of cheap pussy that flies your way.
I’d also like to point out one case of super-hamster inherent in the preselection: it is often justified as “the man having already proven himself of being capable of commitment”. But in order for the woman to have the preselected man, he would first have to break his commitment, rendering it automatically worthless. Such is the irony of female desire…
And thus you’ve got the swooning over widowers.
Exactly.
I don’t think most men can clearly understand the behemoth that is the modern female ego. The biological reasons are all well and true, but power trips and ego boosts should also play into accounts. It’s the same reason women love guys that play hard to get. If you’re unavailable, but then become available TO ME, then it means I am mighty special.
This dykey friend of mine never paid my (then) guy-friend any mind, not until he became my boyfriend. Then when I was away on a trip, she offered him consequence free sex (he was insulted).
That was not mate poaching, that was looking for an ego boost.
Women are mean ; _ ;
“Women are mean” you are right
but saying women are mean is also an immense understatement.
If a man hits a woman we can show the pictures of the bruises
but when women abuse and torture men psychologically , there are no pictures, no evidence, but the damage is often worse
women also abuse other women psychologically until they develop an eating disorder
Now that is serious abuse, but again, no pics and no evidence
I’m 53 years old, my experience and that of most men I know is that women are capable of the worse evil – not physical violence, but psychological violence.
I still love women – there is not a gay cell in me – but the more women I meet, the less I trust them, the more they scare me.
That’s what you call a friend? I’d hold most strangers in higher regard.
My best female friends are the girls I’ve never met or interacted with.
Pretty much in line with what i see. My ex girlfriend texts me the raunchest nastiest photos i’ve seen out of her now that she knows i’m banging another chick. Pretty comical.
Well the point is, would she pursue a relationship? Or is she just out to wreck yours, as it would make her compare favorably to the other chick you’re banging.
This is why whenever an attractive girl asks my relationship status, I reply “it’s complicated.” Hamster meth.
Whenever a gal asks me where I’ve been lately…I respond
“I’ve been around.”
Heh. Stealing that.
Dd you forget that you read that line on this blog? I have been noticing a lot of commenters here and on other blogs echoing back ideas (without citation) that the blogger undoubtedly originally implanted in the commenter’s brain.
I think this is why my girls slaps my hand away when I tastefully “feel her up” in public ( a hug, a neck kiss and a quick ass squeeze…)
She is concerned that Im using her to show other women what I would do to them.
In addition, I suspect a womans attraction to a man in uniform represents a “taken man” to the extent that he is pre-qualified by what ever organization his uniform represents.
[Heartiste: Women — high value women at least — generally dislike PDA. I’ve argued that they dislike it because PDA by men is a form of mate guarding which signals needy betaness. But they may also hate it because it more strongly signals to other women that the man can put his paws all over his lady, and that reinforces his preselected status which elevates the risk of homewrecking interlopers honing in on him. It’s an interesting theoretical question.
Btw, lots of alpha men also hate PDA, because it cramps their style; their style being, namely, to signal availability to other women who could serve as potential mistresses. I hate getting PDA from chicks I’m dating who I’m not particularly into. It closes off promising alternate avenues of sexual delight.]
Your girlfriend is 100% right.
high value or not, when a feminine woman is really into you, she can’t keep her hands off you.
I find the more masculine chicks shun PDA, like anyone would want to touch them anyway.
Yes and no. I have been in 3 ltrs since I was 15.. low beta, high beta and an alpha (both betas ltrs ~ 3 yrs, Alpha ltr ~7 mths (reason I found this site), In between break ups….I dated a handful of betas and alphas. I observed that the low betas where the ones who ALWAYS initiated PDAs. I am okay with handholding, occassional hug/kino here and there etc but I feel extremely uncomfortable kissing or worse, full on making out in Public! It is so crass and tacky. In my relationships with Alpha/dates with alphas, they were never into PDA either unless we been out clubbing and were intoxicated etc, but there have been (sober) moments when they would hold my hand to lead me which I loved. There was this engineer beta I went on a date with recently, quite handsome actually but I knew there was not going to be a second date due to the excessive touching (rubbing elbows while we were at the restaurant…shivers and touching me everytime he laughed)….twas the creepiest thing I have ever encountered on a first date. PDA is gross unless it is simple handholding or pec on the forehead and both parties are in LTRs. and I am as feminine as they come so…..
“moments when they would hold my hand to lead me which I loved”
This is the one type of PDA that I really enjoyed, also. The rest I could live without.
Really? You wouldn’t be charmed if your date just open-mouthed kissed you pretty much out of the blue and then said, “I guess that was a little forward of me.” LOL I must be different
pda whats wrong with it
my chick will walk towards me then run full speed and jump up on me wrapping her legs around me
dudes like dam thats true love wish i had a camera
jumps off top of truck i catch her
we like clebrities people take pics
we dance bitches just stare
i got her with one arm down to the floor
got her from behind she spins to kiss me hard
we have a flow
had a flat tire outside club
carload of chicks gave me some run flat and waited till i got it in then we left
when i see a couple in the club grooving and in sink together makes me happy for em i want to clap cause it is a rare thing
might as well have that kind of time in my book
or if your in love and not having a good time what is the point
The kissing passionately part is good, but I’m not sure I like “I guess that was a little forward of me”. It sounds too much like an apology.
I think there’s a term for it, but I’m forgetting my Pick-Up 101 training. If you acknowledge an objection a woman might be having, it has a way of dispelling it.
Why be concerned? Just enjoy it, I say
kate is that you must have have found the right dude
Yeah, but he’s slipped out of my sticky web of cuddlewoo.
aww
Don’t worry. I’m carefully crafting a counterattack of bikini-warfare.
well my chick can just pick any guy now so keep having fun
Never been a fan of PDA myself as a guy…to me I think gals hate it when a man does it moreso because they will think other gals are judging her.
they both hate it and love it.
they hate it for reasons already given by you and other commenters, but they also love it because it’s a signal to other females that you have chosen her, that you own her. it’s a ‘nyah nyah!’.
What about PDD? Public display of domination (hair pulling, ass slapping, arm restraining etc…)?
What about PDD?
Nothing too overt, it makes you look insecure. But subtle order-and-response shames other men, pisses off the wrong women, stirs up the right ones, and thrills your well-adjusted girl to take a brief tip-toe out of the “Yep, I’m his whore” closet. Good for relationships, great for society: unpossessive men should be ridiculed by other men’s actions into reforming themselves.
Matt
Sirrah Grumio, go to your mistress;
Say, I command her to come to me.
like her lighting your cigs for you and buying the drinks he he he
[Heartiste: Women — high value women at least — generally dislike PDA. I’ve argued that they dislike it because PDA by men is a form of mate guarding which signals needy betaness. But they may also hate it because it more strongly signals to other women that the man can put his paws all over his lady, and that reinforces his preselected status which elevates the risk of homewrecking interlopers honing in on him. It’s an interesting theoretical question.
I think some newbs think that they’re supposed to put their hands on her. This may also be an explanation for hoverhands: they think they should paw her, but don’t have the guts to do it. The fact that it’s alpha to keep your hands off her in public (unless you’re leading her somewhere by holding her hand, say, if the sidewalk is icy) should help betas avoid handisness, and omegas to avoid hoverhandsiness.
Btw, lots of alpha men also hate PDA, because it cramps their style; their style being, namely, to signal availability to other women who could serve as potential mistresses. I hate getting PDA from chicks I’m dating who I’m not particularly into. It closes off promising alternate avenues of sexual delight.]
So women get discouraged if they see another girl petting you? I’m confused… isn’t that the whole point of advertising preselection? What if any women who see a girl pawing you see you a few weeks later without the girl?
He gets discouraged because those women are getting in the way of him meeting others. Its like someone monopolizing your attention so you can’t talk to or see anyone else. It probably does pay off later though.
Regarding “pawing”: paw has a good connotation to me, but you don’t want puppy paw, you want old dog paw. A guy’s touch should be heavy and substantial, not like a mosquito you want to brush away.
To clarify, Im refering to wives and girlfriends, not “dates”, or some woman who don’t think you are hers. In addition when I say a “tastefull” PDA, Im not talking about a move that gets attention or makes people look. Im talking about the move that makes people keep looking if they are already looking.
Grabbing high or low on the waist and they move your hand away because you almost got a handfull of titty meat or ass…
To me, this is not mate guarding or beta because its my instinct, I do it when I want to do it and she’s want to be in charge of my instinct.
This is why it turns into a big arguement. She wants to be incharge of my instinct so it can be another thing about me she can CONTROL. She hates that she can’t control that part of me.
Its a grudge match that I will never allow her to win because at the end of the day, even though Im her pet tiger, Im still a wild animal and all bitches are at risk of being eaten, including her.
Grrrrrrrrrrrr.
i’m in the zone on a chick again to the point where i can do anything including murder
what you got to do is take away all her body parts they aren’t hers anymore they are yours
so thats your ass your grabbing those are your tits your grabbing those are your legs those are your lips thats your pussy thats your body to do what the fuck you want with get her to start agreeing to that and should be good to go
only prob with it is she might mirror and start saying your dick is hers and talk about stuffing it and keeping it if you try to leave theres always pitfalls to everything i guess he he he
ps you spelled argument wrong he he he
Nothng but fact in this post. I lived it as a kid, when my idiot Dad fell for the homewrecking whore chasing him. These bitches can’t be taken seriously……
Great post. Also recommended: The Last Psychiatrists new post on women. She may be the most self aware woman I’ve ever read on the internets.
I thought that was written by a man?
i thought it was a man too
whoops my bad. TLP is a man.
http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2013/01/no_self-respecting_woman_would.html
self aware woman
not possible.
Considering how cutthroat women are with each other…it still boggles my mind that guys want to be friends with them.
I laugh everytime when a woman says she wants to be friends first or that a guy says his wife is his best friend and confidant.
Are you familiar with Rene Girard’s theory of mimetic desire? I suspect this principle plays a role here. Essentially, the theory holds that a substantial reason that people desire things is because those things are desired by other people. That is how we learn to value and compete over certain things. We generally seek riches because our role models and parents and neighbors seek riches. Very few people ever stop to take stock of what they actually want or what they actually need, so they often use other people’s desires as a way to determine what they should pursue. Think of how the stock market operates. Few traders have any real knowledge of how any particular stock will trend, but if a sufficient number of traders begin buying or selling a particular stock, most of the rest will follow.
Modern women, who are not consciously in tune with their desires, have very little understanding of what they want. So women use proxies to determine the men that they desire. If he is desired by other women, he must clearly be of high value, so she will desire him too. If another woman has gone so far as to enter into a close relationship with that man, then all the more reason to desire him. Men are far more understanding of their instincts and wants, so they do not need to use such proxies to know what they desire.
This is also a part of the reason that men are more likely to be leaders and women followers. Knowing and understanding what they want and what they should seek, men can often serve as women’s moral compass and her anchor in a world where she does not know what she ought to desire.
… women…… have very little understanding of what they want…… If he is desired by other women, he must clearly be of high value, so she will desire him too…
I had come to more or less the same conclusion
women are not good at evaluating or ” appraising” men, few women have an analytical mind and most of them are driven by their hormones anyway, and hormones make then behave in very irrational ways
Women ( most of them ) being unable to ” appraise” the value of a man, they figure – consciously or not – that if another woman married him, he must be high value, so she wants him, the married one ( or the one with a girlfriend )
I think Girard said more precisely that you don’t really want the object, but rather the “joy” it gives to its present owner.
[…] […]
It’s all pre-selection – Having a woman is an alpha trait, and women want a piece of that.
I found that out about a year ago. I met a girl through a friend and we began casually hooking up, and she blabbed about it to all her friends. Suddenly her (Much hotter) best friend began pursuing me. Once I called it off with the main girl, the hot best friend just completely disappeared and I never spoke to her again. Chicks are driven crazy when they’re not the center of attention, so she was willing to ruin her friendship just to steal the thunder away from her friend.
Completely off topic…
I could go on and on about my personal situation.. Bottom line is (judging myself in regards to most definitions i’ve read) I am a natural Alpha in regards to social interactions, personal and work related relationships, but especially in regards to women… I am single, 37, and at the very pinnacle of my game and poon aquisition. I would really like for someone, ANYONE, that lives and works in the West, how they felt getting that first paycheck of the year? I make an above “average” income I would say… and as it is, already try my best to live below my means and things remain relatively “tight” for me each month. And now I suddenly take home 160 bucks LESS a month? A new Tax hike they call it…
My feeling is today, as I scrape my last pennies together as it is to pay my utilities, that the Feminized West has almost successfully forced single men to settle into LTRs and marriages they have lived just fine without, to add that second income into their households. I could go on, but I think you get the point. Is this what America is trying to do? FORCE people together, by making it progressively more difficult to substain on our own?
I’m telling you man, I got that direct deposit and started wondering how quickly I could get the fuck out of dodge.
It hurt and it sucks
We need a new set of social stigmas. The current PC, “anything one consents to is OK, the only thing to stigmatize are those who would criticize others for their choices” has got to go. The new stigmas will pretty much be the same as the old stigmas, only now we will understand why the old stigmas were what they were; that unleashed hypergamy is socially destructive.
That won’t happen until the current edifice of lies crumbles. First, statist society collapses. Then, we rebuild.
Saw and hammer in hand, boss.
No need to participate in the demolition, lest you share in the blame. Let the horde of dullards who believe in the Free Shit Fairy™ learn the hard way on their own. Nothing less has a prayer of penetrating their thick skulls.
Let it burn.
I was talking about the rebuilding.
Ive got my C4 and det cord, can I do some damage? Im black; its not like they can blame me for anything they ain’t already blamed me for?
(((shakin my head)))
Yah, sure. The Jesus descends from the sky?
My size 12 ascends from the ground, Schlomo.
Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man sows, that shall he also reap.
Quite.
I’m mirin’ this article Brah
That doesn’t make you a homo, it makes you human.
it’s like trying to get a job…is it better to already have a job or be unemployed? Employers want to know why you’re unemployed…but if you’re employed they are interested. Plus, you don’t look desperate…
A very appropriate comparison given then most of HR is female.
My GF gave me a framed picture of herself to keep on my nightstand. I’m pretty sure she figured it would scare off other women. And when I got a GF I figured telling girls I had one would scare them off.
Turns out it actually helps so much (not just in getting laid but in keeping the relationships to drama-free casual fuckbuddy situs (“sorry I can’t go to your xmas party with you, I already have a girlfriend for that shit remember?”)) that if she broke up with me I would probably keep her photo on my nightstand and keep telling girls I was still with her lol
George Costanza knew what was up:
lol
Yah, this post hits home.
When a girl is attracted to you and interested in you… she could not CARE LESS about “ethics,” “morals,” rings, vows, or the “sisterhood”…
And that not caring applies to both yours AND HERS.
Color me not surprised…
intersexual competition strikes again. Like the child who wants to play with the toy the other children are playing with.
Moral of the story. Be the best toy, and they will cum.
Yup https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=MaOUnwfD1dQ
Lettuce be cereal for a moment brah. When chicks are looking at the ring on my finger I point to them and say “you mirin’ brah?”
Wet panties fly off in all directions.
CH should start up a companion blog with all the scientific research he’s compiled for our viewing pleasure.. call it Science vs. Feminism
or
You might be a Feminist retard if..
Seriously. Everytime i read CH put up another post of scientifically verifiable proof that blows massive holes in the keel of the HMS Femcunt and it’s start taking on water like a fat feminist inhales a can of CoolWhip foam… im always surprised they manage to somehow keep that ship adrift.
That ship needs to be brought down to davey jones.
LULZ The Tattooed Troll Yenta Won’t marry until gay marriage is legal.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2013/01/15/lena-dunham-gay-marriage
This I can confirm. I have had more attention and action since I got married.
The wife’s legs closed and others opened.
With female standards there is no there, there. They only care what another woman thinks who only cares what another woman thinks and on and on into an oblivion of empty minds.
I have a female friend who is living with an older, physically unimpressive man, with limited means, and with a baby mama. She ended two (!) relationships with younger, better looking men, with no prior marriage or kids. And she is completely oblivious to the reason why she is an idiot even when I straight out tell her.
In a world where all the women live in lala land, all that matters is confident alphaness. ALL else is futile.
the article says:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17619-its-true-all-the-taken-men-are-best.html
“Apart from the explanation of “pre-screening”, another possibility”
Aint’ that a PUA term?
I’ve known this truth for a LONG time. Good to see it on CH. It’s amazing how simply by being with a woman or spinning plates, other women just KNOW you are fucking someone else, and pick up on it immediately. You don’t have to say anything, they just know. It’s like they smell the residual pussy on you.
Funny how that works, when you’re not seeing anyone it’s harder to get women attracted to you simply by virtue of them knowing you have no one else jumping your bones. Though when preselected or taken suddenly you’re more of a bachelor than you were when actually single & furthermore a highly desirable prospective partner in other women’s eyes.
Works the other way too, once the women get you, or think they have you, suddenly all the other SINGLE men who aren’t tied down to a woman are more attractive, as well as the taken men whose relationships appear to be of better quality. It’s a lose/lose or win/win however you look at it: just be sure to enjoy yourself regardless, and never let yourself fall prey to believing what women say. Just climb the ladder like it’s Jacob’s or do as a woman would – onto the next better prospect according to a flim-flam whim of solipsistic I WANT I FEEL _____ nascent emotionally directive cues. Be a man: think like a woman: act via desire. Become a lesbian, essentially. Or jump ship! Or learn Game. Or don’t. Who cares anyways? After a year or so of all this Game it finally makes sense: nothing needs to make sense, just do whatever you do, and enjoy. Blow jobs, babies, bitches, & bondage will follow, naturally.
This accounts for dry spells and deluges. Sometimes I’ll go for a while with little female attention, but when it rains, it pours.
That’s probably due to several factors, among which are the topic of the article and LVX’s comment and the confidence boost from spinning plates, which then plays out in frame and presentation.
So it’s a constructive spiral, or catch-22 if you’re in the dry spell. But that’s why we have game and the Chateau.
Or they could take this man
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2257209/Wealthy-Indian-Datta-Phuge-spends-14-000-shirt-GOLD-impress-ladies.html
Beta of the Week perhaps
Or this Beta of the Week, Tiger Woods?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2263497/Tiger-Woods-tries-win-ex-wife-Elin-200-million-deal-says-yes–claims-new-report.html
Since their divorce, Elin has dated several men, including wealthy financier Jamie Dingman.
The stunning Swede, who recently showed off her flawless figure while on holiday in the Bahamas with her children and family, has been spotted around South Florida with professional hockey player Douglas Murray, who she was first romantically linked to in July 2012.
However the NHL player didn’t appear to be vacationing with Elin and her family at the exclusive Paradise Island resort.
She found out very quick that nobody of worth wants a scorned middle-aged divorced chick with a new entitlement complex. Either way her & Tigers relationship is already demolished beyond repair, she has 0 respect for him and it will not end pretty
still worth a fling, not worth a ring.
hope she enjoyed getting mudsharked. now to retire on the carousel.
Tiger didn’t grow up in the hood. Nobody taught him how to be a “playa”. So when his dad died, he dove in head first.
There is a lesson here.
“Men were keenest on pursuing new mates, but weren’t bothered whether their target was already attached or not.”
Yeah, that’s me. But I recently started an affair with a single woman after several with married girls. Gotta say, it is refreshing to have a place to meet and have sex and only have one of us have to make excuses.
I am in my early 40s but even 5 years ago would have been SHOCKED at how many women – married or single – really seem to prefer attached men.
Marriage means next to nothing anymore (though it is better for the kids so that is why I am married).
Only gays went to get married.
[…] [Women Prefer Taken Men] […]
You know what else women prefer?
RAPE!
But seriously, ya, a fuckbuddy/wife/gf can get you laid more. Separate from pre-selection, it relaxes you if you’re hitting on another woman–less need to worry about “not getting laid” if you fuck it up, because you’ve got something else waiting for you. So you’re more confident AND less needy, both of which trigger her desire.
Also, in regards to pre-selection, recall that most chick shows and movies revolve around two or more chicks competing for the affections of one man. Dynasty (1980s prime time soap) was a famous example; Sex and The City had a plot revolving around the ugly SJP stealing Mr. Big from his younger, hotter wife;the movie Death Becomes Her was driven by a plot where a nerdy loser (Bruce Willis), by dint of his profession (plastic surgeon) and money, becomes the lifelong MacGuffin of both Meryl Streep and Goldie Hawn. Many teen movies have the mean girls v. nice girls motif, where partial victory comes when nice girl eventually gets stud over mean girl.
Women see a man with a woman, and it triggers an instinct to climb that totem pole (heh). But the man may as well be a new dress, a beauty pageant first place trophy, or a deluxe apartment in NYC—he is merely objectified by her.
For all feminazis complaints about men “objectifying” women, it is women who do it overwhelmingly more. I mean dildos, hello—a perfect example of objectifying men.
That’s a characteristic of the left: whatever they negatively accuse the anti-left of being or doing, it’s really they who are guilty of it–projection.
Rape is my wing man
Heh, heh… new put-down line for shutting up feminists who bring up men treating women as “objects”:
“When fleshlights outsell dildos, you’ll have a point.”
fleshlight
Okay, I had to google that one.
Wasn’t this a Seinfeld episode? George with the picture of a model as his ex.
It was the subject of two Seinfeld episodes. One is the one you mention, and the other was a very early one where George wore a wedding ring to a party. To find the best scene, Google the phrase: George needs a Superfit Ring.
http://y4ser.wordpress.com/2012/10/08/konkurens-mellan-kvinnor/
Damn, wrong link above. Should have been this:
Like all niggers (except those who identify openly as anti-leftist), Rock is allowed to speak uncomfortable truths about women and feel no repercussions. Hell, the SWPLs bitches watching it probably laughed hard and didn’t think anything of it.
I met a man once who was a former Republican fundraiser, and he talked about a bipartisan dinner he’ gone to with other mover and shakers in honor of MLK day in the mid 2000s).
He was shocked at how the leftist powerbrokers openly called blacks niggers and made racist jokes, right in front of some reporters (who were invited, and all convos off the record).
But because the bastards were on the “correct” side of politics, the reporters chuckled along.
Makes me want to be a criminal defense attorney. I’d be able to scream “nigger” all day and never have much of a problem
At one time, I worked with a White Personal Injury Lawyer who continues to make a fortune with certain cases before largely-black juries in an urban city close by.
What he does: closing arguments before these black juries he suddenly invokes “Martin Luther King” in some capacity before the usually white Insurance Defense opposition.
Somehow my friend works “MLK” into the fender-bender.
You might think certain connections are way too tangential. Not so! It all depends on your audience.
He wins 90% of his cases this way.
Moral of the story: Stop trying to save the world – know your audience and work them nigga!
Much like how Rosa Parks always seems to find her way into debates over everything from abortion to marijuana.
Of course, Hitler still leads the pack by several furlongs.
MSN recognizes on Don’t trust that.. “take something that’s available, who want’s that, take something from someone… VALUE!” maybe the chateau moonlights at ABC
I’ve been reading my old Archie comics from the 80s-mid 90s, before they went Liberal and there are occasional game tips.
For example Cheryl Blossom is sexy and forward. A self proclaimed ‘man-killer’. The entire male cast likes her.
Who does she love? A dweeb who gives her affection but little attention. Since he’s the only guy who doesn’t chase her she loves him.
I think it was H.L Mencken who said that a misogamist was any man who hated women as much as they hate each other. There is truth to this statement.
Men, particularly young men, tend to have lots of friend. Women tend to have 1 or 2 good friends, and they often back-stab even these close friends. Go to a restaurant or the beach (if you live in LA or FL). You will notice lots of women out in public by themselves. Guys are usually with friends in such milieus.
Practical guide question for those who are considering getting hitch:
We know that we should never ask women of their sexual history because it will make us appear an insecure beta but we also say that we should know whether a woman is marriage material by assessing the number of her sexual relations. How can we know then that a woman is worth being committed to without being nosy?
How can we know then that a woman is worth being committed to without being nosy?
The one and only purpose of marriage is the creation, birthing, nurturing, raising, and teaching of CHILDREN.
The one and only reason to marry a chick is to spend the rest of your life making and raising kids with her.
And vice versa: Marry her if and only if she wants nothing but to make & raise children with you for the rest of her life.
look through the archives for ‘slut tell’ articles, there are several.
All true. Chicks who won’t give me a passing glance if I’m walking down the street alone will stare long and hard if I’m with a girl and if she’s somewhat hot the stare lasts even longer. Women are shameless. The “aloof” thing I don’t buy since I can be single/alone and aloof and get zero interest, but the preselection thing is key. One lady friend said to me once: “guys with chicks are chick MAGNETS.”
[…] Really, if feminists were smart (asking a lot, I know), they’d realize their worst enemies aren’t laser-guided ego-targeting truth bombers like yours truly, but other women who will claw, scratch and passive-aggressively sabotage their way over the messed tresses of their sexual market Source: Chateau Heartiste […]
This very concept first came to my attention when discussing, of all things, a restauarant with a young woman I knew almost 30 years ago. She was going on and on about how she would not go to such-and-such restaurant because it was not jam-packed with people. Maybe I read too much into her comments and it was nothing more than the typical female herd mentality, but I definitely picked up a vibe that she judged men the same way. Unattached = not worth giving the time of day too.
Oh, and I think she secretly had the hots for a buddy of mine. I heard her describing him to one of her friends as “absolutely vulgar.”
A sort of related phenomenon: I tend to find women who weren’t interested in my advances or innuendos when they were single become into me once they have a boyfriend. Not really sure what to make of it.
OT
Show about low-class whites? Full steam ahead! Show about low-class blacks? Pulled. wtsp.com/news/entertain… 9 hours ago
Shoot… they’re cancelling Cops?
Chris Rock’s got the right idea about this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaOUnwfD1dQ
but yea chicks keep calling and coming to door
woke up to knock on door this morning i go to door
i tell chick i just relized i’m only in my underwear
she says thats ok
he he he
i close door and put some pants on
the online chicks from three months ago are still calling even after my chick told em to stop
so if you want a line that works good tell chicks you have a wife you will be going back to oversees now that is chick crack
today kind of monumental my chicks first day without any drugs mission somewhat accomplished i guess my mom was right i can do anything i put my mind too
CH, are you OK with Mark Zuckerberg’s decision that the new Facebook Search will only return “age appropriate” results when you ask to see a list of single women in your area?
Is the manosphere going to take this lying down?
The set of results were even age-appropriate for the person posing the query. “We’re trying to facilitate good things,” Tom Stocky of Facebook said.
So what’s a bad thing in this mangina’s eyes?
Another example:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2263518/I-left-love-life-I-thought-I-better-Now-Im-childless-42.html
I call bullshit… by the end of the week, that broad will have 200 marriage proposals.
LOL
Fellas, this is what happens when you allow a woman to be president of your company; they hate being president. They hate it so much they will leave you to go back to the mailroom and lick envelopes.
When the King is happy, everybody is happy.
I moved into a rented flat a few miles away in Hornchurch, Essex, and embraced single life with a vengeance. By now I was an editor on a national magazine. Life was one long round of premieres and dinner or drinks parties.
God I love being able to read between the lines. I don’t even wanna know what that woman’s notch count ended up at. All I have to say is you reap what you sew
A thought;
By reifying the concept of evil into a physical manifestation of “the Devil”, do you play upon human, in particular female, herd like social instincts to not belong to the wrong group when you accuse them of being on the side of the devil as opposed to just saying whatever it is you are chastising them for is immoral, or exploitative or parasitic? Hence why ad hominens can have such a hefty effect?
And perhaps the reason this works is because through our culture people have a lot of negative images, notions, beliefs that have been burned into their mind about “the devil group” and hence don’t want to associate themselves with them, (i.e. images of people laughing wickedly as they kill puppies.)
I know when I imagine satanic cults I bring up images in my mind of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s End of Days or the Devil’s Advocate where those men involved with the devil must submit themselves as cuckolds to him while the devil fucks their wives and daughters and hence that is the negative emotional stimuli (submitting to cuckoldry to those who defile your women) that belonging to that group attaches itself to and thus avers me from it.
Ergo, if one wishes to have the same persuasive effect that religion of old had, and now leftism/liberalism does, one should go about constructing these negative mental images about that which you wish people to shun, and then seeding them into the volk-consciousness so that they may then make anathema the belonging to of those groups.
Which is kind of exactly what “game” is doing with respect to feminism. Alpha/beta, mangina’s & manboobs.
The pen is mightier than the sword, and every time you write a lay-report, you’re slaying dragons.
Perhaps the better term than volk-consciousness would be collective-consciousness.
just wow:
Electrifyingly good!
I don’t know how anyone could watch this whole thing
I couldn’t make it past the haircut.