There are apparently asexuals among us. They claim they have no interest in sex, and it’s not a psychological coping mechanism for involuntary celibacy.
Jenni is one of the estimated 1% of people in the UK who identify themselves as asexual. Asexuality is described as an orientation, unlike celibacy which is a choice.
“People say ‘well if you’ve not tried it, then how do you know?’” says Jenni.
“Well if you’re straight have you tried having sex with somebody you know of the same sex as you? How do you know you wouldn’t enjoy that? You just know that if you’re not interested in it, you’re not interested in it, regardless of having tried it or not.”
I’m trying to picture how musty and cobwebbed her vagina must be. It’s probably fused shut at this point, kind of how the skin of morbidly obese corpses will fuse with the couches they died on. I wonder if she’s ever shoved anything up her puss to get off? If so, that would put the lie to her assertion that she has no desire for sex. More likely, she just fears and loathes male sexuality. I bet her nightmares consists of 3D penises raining down on her like ICBMs scarring the sky with cum contrails.
This is true of Jenni who is heteroromantic, and although having no interest in sex, is still attracted to people, and is in a relationship with 22-year-old Tim. Tim, however, is not asexual.
“A lot of people actually ask if I am being selfish and keeping him in a relationship that he won’t get anything he wants [from] and he should go and date somebody like him, but he seems quite happy, so I’d say I’d leave that up to him,” says Jenni.
Just when you thought the world couldn’t possibly have enough self-hating beta males willing to sacrifice a basic human need for the company of weirdo übercockteases. And is it my imagination, or is the ratio of white and asian beta to alpha getting more skewed every year? Welcome to Generation Puffboy.
Tim is enjoying spending time with and getting to know Jenni by focusing on the romantic aspects of their relationship.
It’s like compliment & cuddle, times one thousand. With no chance for redemption in sight.
“The first time that Jenni mentioned in conversation that she was asexual, my initial thought was ‘hmm that’s kind of odd’,” says Tim, “but then I did know enough not to make assumptions about what that meant.
What a mincing pissant. Tim, when a girl you met has told you that she doesn’t like sex and will never have sex, your first thought should’ve been “I just wasted thirty dates with this insufferable cocktease. How do I get away from her before my emasculation is total?” At the very least, return the favor by using her as a pawn to meet other girls.
[Tim]: “I have never been obsessed with sex. I’ve not been one to have to go out at night and have to have someone to have sex with, because that’s what people do… so I’m not all that concerned about it”.
One reason why betas allow themselves to be LFBFed and used as emotional tampons in perpetuity is that it relieves them of the stress of sacking up and busting a move. You could call it cockooning.
Jenni’s relationship with Tim does have a physical side, as they cuddle and kiss to express their affection for each other.
And there it is. Beta of the Month. Congratulations, Timmy, you sicken the world of normal men and inspire the pity of normal women. When you masturbate away all that pent-up energy, lay down a tarp with a ten yard clearance.
Asexuality has been the subject of very few scientific studies which has led to speculation about why some people feel no sexual attraction.
“There are people who definitely view it as a disorder and are like ‘oh if we give you these pills we can fix it’. Or people who ask you ‘have you had your hormones checked’, as though that’s the obvious solution,” says Jenni.
Maybe Jenni really is clinically asexual. Maybe her brain is missing a few synapses. I can abide that possibility. Or maybe, she feels no sexual attraction because all she dates are betas. In which case, one date with an insensitive jerk who isn’t an uuuuunderstanding wet noodle should clear her condition right up.
“And then you get people who go one step worse, and I have been asked before if I had been molested as a child, which is not an appropriate question to ask somebody to be honest, and also I haven’t been. It was the assumption that ‘hey you have something wrong with you, clearly you were molested as a child’ is just such a terrible attitude to have.”
This is the problem with the modern, equalist society: nothing is wrong with anything. Hey, sweetcheeks, there is something wrong with you. Evolutionarily speaking, there is something very wrong with you. Instead of demanding people pretend you’re normal, embrace your wrongness. Wear it proudly, you princess of deviancy, you queen of crazy.
Let’s have a look at the tense couple.
Now perhaps there’s a chance Timmy is getting some nookie on the side, when he’s away from this sexless cipher. That would mitigate his betaness somewhat. (Only somewhat, because every second with her is a second stripped from more fulfilling endeavors.) I doubt it, though. Look at his face. His pinched, “walk all over me” expression. This is a guy who nurses a secret hard-on every time she hugs him, then rushes home five hours later to drain himself into a couch crease. The least she could do, if sex isn’t her thing and she values his cuddly wuddlies, is give him a tug job to completion. But she never will, because, ultimately, chicks like her are selfish cunts. And when a selfish cunt meets a selfless dweeb, the penis loses.
BOTM: Timmy and his taunted testicles
OMFG!
Yeah, he’s so happy he won’t even look at the camera – the very vision of masculine pride.
How does looking at a camera equal happiness? How exactly does looking at a camera equal “masculine pride”?
Oh wow you are a troglodyte aren’t you? judgmental much? Not wanting to have sexual intercourse does no make you a prude or a cock tease. I’ve had bouts of asexual feelings as well as the complete opposite feelings and the point is all feelings are personal and valid.
Thinking the only way to be intimate with another person is through sexual contact is not only ridiculous but incredibly limiting. This woman was kind enough to open up to you and instead of trying to look at life from her perspective you immediately demonized and vilified her for her PERSONAL choices which are not only none of your business but have nothing to do with you!
Do the world a favor and either pull your head out of whatever dark hole its shoved into or keep your banal asinine comments to yourself.
So you’re saying that when you’re in an intimate relationship — as these two losers appear to be — and the other person tells you you’re not getting any nooky, you’re not supposed to take it personally? Because it’s a personal choice that’s none of your business?
Jesus, lady, is there anything more personal than having your putative sex partner tell you you’re not worth fucking?
You should take your own advice.
Have you watched the recent House episode where he finds out what’s wrong with an asexual couple? You’ll love it.
What episode? Link?
The episode is called “Better Half” and it aired on January 23. However, it’s inaccurate in its portrayal of asexuality.
http://www.hulu.com/watch/321932/house-better-half
Voluntary eunuchs. What a concept.
Asexuality isn’t voluntary.
Nope, it’s a mental issue, just like homosexuality. Though at least asexuality doesn’t drive you to plunge your dick in another dude’s ass.
Just when I begin to think there’s a bottom limit to Betas, another proves me so wrong. Also, here’s an uber-Beta who might rival our asexual friend:
http://www.yaledailynews.com/news/2012/feb/02/lilienfeld-in-the-frosh-pit/
i actually think that kid will figure it out. check out turbohamster on the long-winded chick response in the comments.
Actually that took alot of balls to throw all that out there.
The kid’s only 18. He’ll be Neil Strauss-level macking by his senior year – and utterly merciless toward the kind of bullshit some of his female classmates are bringing in the comments.
I bet the comment from “Drew” was the best but the YDN staff deleted it as being against their terms of service.
Nobody mentioned in the comments or the article that the coeds have a very limited amount of time before the tables would turn in their mid-twenties. The assumption that female SMV doesn’t change over time was rampant in the discussion.
Except maybe Drew violated the terms by writing that.
[heartiste: interestingly, i bet more than a few female asexuals are young and thus blind to the inevitable deterioration of their sexual attractiveness. this allows them the luxury of being “asexual” while keeping open the possibility of future couplings should their psychosis reverse itself (or be reversed by a man who truly excites them). it’s a pose, iow, nothing more, and one that is aggravated by low testosterone and hormonal imbalances.]
Sure, just blame “chemical imbalances” for everyone’s behavioral differences. Everyone has some sort of imbalance; that’s because the mind and the brain aren’t separated in some magical way. When you think differently, your brain reacts differently. Just because I have more serotonin than you doesn’t mean that you need antidepressants.
Of course, Heartiste, never having experienced the terror that mania or depression or psychosis is, can easily diagnose people with all sorts of mental illnesses. People who prefer to stay home more than the average person are labeled “socially anxious” in need of treatment, people who have a down day after a breakup are considered depressed, and now you say that people who are not significantly attracted to the opposite sex are “hormonally imbalanced.”
People are unique and different from each other. It’s ironic how the seduction community claims to preach being “non-judgmental.” You have no right to tell other people how to live. As long as they are not bothering you, which this woman is clearly not, leave them alone.
He’s young and hasn’t had the stinking scales of feminism (and, as a Yalie, I would assume far leftism) fall from his eyes.
Hopefully he will someday look down, realize there are two of them down there, stop fearfully apologizing, and start molesting trashy state college girls, ideally until around age 40 or do.
At that point, comfortably ensconced in a well paid career, he’ll find some foreign, slender, feminine sexbot to start with which to start a family, if he wants to give up fun hobbies, other women, and free time.
Haha…. this guy is beta at best, but more likely just 100% omega and happy to merely (and finally) have some female companionship. Arguably, a platonic relationship with a female is a step up above sitting in your room all day by yourself just jacking off and playing World of Warcraft.
Anyway, off-topic question still related to lifelong pick-up/game. It’s not doubt that being a beta or omega will give you a poor life. But being a lifelong pump-and-dump alpha, does anyone here feel like this lifestyle is a ticking HIV/(insert other STI) timebomb? Thoughts, anyone? Heartiste?
It almost seems like a lose/lose, but maybe a fellow alpha/higher alpha can help clear my mind.
[heartiste: the stink of troll on this comment is strong.]
“Arguably, a platonic relationship with a female is a step up above sitting in your room all day by yourself just jacking off and playing World of Warcraft.”
If you would not rather look at pornography alone, and just go about your business, than have anything to do with that freak above, you have one foot in the Timmy Boat.
“Thoughts, anyone?”
Avoid shagging fags, and slags who shag fags, you’ll be fine.
For any other n00bs happening by: The higher quality women that alphas usually end up with generally have very low STD rates. That’s one reason why they’re higher quality women.
High quality women (by that I mean normal, responsible women who plan to become wives and mothers, which is still about 90% of women) don’t even think about sleeping with idiots like you and other people commenting on this blog …
Normal women are not interested in casual sex, did you know that? Women who these “alphas” sleep with are emotionally damaged and most likely drunk. Emotionally normal, normally conscious women with normal IQ don’t go out to bars looking for a hookup.
So Dominate247 is very right – with a pathetic lifestyle that some people here promote you can expect to catch an STD sooner or later. I’m happy that at least the author(s) of this blog advocate romantic love and don’t write depressive posts about dirty emotionless sex with drunk girls … (something we can read at RooshV)
And how many of those 90% haven’t ridden the carousel? What’s your number up to? There’s a reason that modern women don’t wanna discuss their “past” with their boyfriends.
High quality women are rare.
Why does a woman have to want children to be high quality? I get that you’re probably idealizing a traditional wife/mother thing, but how many of the guys who post here do you think want children? So why does a woman lose quality if she doesn’t want kids (or can’t have them)?
Even if they don’t want children, they certainly idealize those qualities. Its been related here so many times as to be a cliche.
In America, the social scene is more as in Britain than the Continent. Substitute bars for discotheques. Nice European women in the prime breeding years still go to those, and even if they don’t go home with a man every night, some do, usually those who are ovulating. But I agree that the frequency of ONS sex is simply not there for most men, even if they get decent at game. I think in the end, game gets practiced most successfully in the serial monogamy subset of society. My attitude has always been that if I like a girl enough to sleep with her once, then twice or more is even better. My relationships that failed short term were ultimately due to basic incompatability or challenging circumstances. I’ve also been selective and have not slept with many women I could have. Nice girls get sucked into that nexus quite easily.
Have you ever heard of mitigating risk by wearing latex condoms?
Beta’s life is driven by fear.
Nobody gets HIV. More importantly, you’re allowed to find a middle ground between lifelong pump-and-dump and lifelong celibacy. Duh.
Too bad the “sexual marketplace” hell that is the dating/mating/marriage scene today doesn’t have a middle ground– it’s pumped-and-dump/carousel or nothing. He/she who dies still with a spouse somehow wins!
People do get HIV. And asexuality is not the same as celibacy. Asexuality is not experiencing sexual attraction. While celibacy is voluntarily abstaining from sex.
She’d let me split her slit.
Actually, I bet she wouldn’t because from the sounds of it, she is in a comitted monogamous relationship and is the type of asexual that doesn’t want and doesn’t have sex.
[Tim]: “I have never been obsessed with sex. I’ve not been one to have to go out at night and have to have someone to have sex with, because that’s what people do… so I’m not all that concerned about it”.
In true beta ” “I’m not like those other guys”fashion, he rationalizes that wanting sex is the same as being obsessed with sex.
He would’ve did the same thing if she shut him down after the first attempts at sex.
I wonder if, just as the guy allows the LJBF out of fear of the stress of having brass balls and slapping that ass
I wonder if she takes the ‘asexual’ posture for the same general reason.
In any case, I’d ransack that tasty little tart.
She’s about five feet tall, bone-thin, and looks elfen; definitely no curves beyond the most basic female dimensions. Possible neoteny.
Probably with the onset of puberty, she instinctively understood that she wasn’t competing with other pubertal females, then took deep refuge in manga, Bjork, and Tank Girl.
I’d bet money she sifts through photos of hot girls at 4chan. Twats like that are usually masochistic, betraying their dissatisfaction with self.
Any woman who dyes her hair like a clown wig doesn’t need to open her mouth to let the world know she’s a headcase.
To me, the whole candy-colored coif and the “Look at me, I don’t have sex!” schtick reeks of yet-another variation of Attention Whore.
And without knowing any better, seeing the proboscis on that Adrian Brody look-alike beta of hers, I detect the faint odor of gefilte fish on this whole story.
You’re close.
Female, like male sexual desire, correlates very strongly with circulating androgens. This girl looks like she literally “suffers” from that latest of middle aged male pharmafads, low-T. Talk about slight build, wide set eyes and the lack of a manjaw. Plus the somewhat childlike, asexual notion that beauty in females are judged like beauty in a painting; by the strength and composition of colors in her hair, rather than by the interplay of flaunting and hinting at sexual cues. Not that I’d ever expect she would care to demonstrate, but I’d almost be willing to bet there isn’t much there in the way of a clitoris for her to get off with, either.
Just like kids don’t have much in the way of sexual desire, it is not much of a stretch to imagine adults with a child like composition of circulating sex hormones are similarly disposed. And if anyone likes to cuddle with no desire to escalate, despite what the pedos might convince themselves, it’s kids.
But honestly, while self describing as literally asexual may going a bit far to the other side, I don’t think it is any more of a disorder than the wannabe-carricature-of-Sex-and-the-city-and-hip-hop-whore-sex-obsession that afflicts most US females these days. After all, as long as this girl manages to suck it up and get pregnant before 40, that still puts her ahead of most of her barren, whoring peers. And she’ll probably be a faithful wife and cuddling mom to boot
Fair points… well done.
Why the hell does she need to “suck it up and get pregnant before 40.” It’s not like this planet is suffering from underpopulation, exactly.
That’s a buttered up photo. Here’s a better one: http://www.tutorhunt.com/profile-images/jenni.goodchild98609395.jpg
Nothing “tasty” about her.
She lost the genetic lottery and now is rationalizing.
She COULD snag a guy 1-2 points more alpha by getting rid of the “Homosex FO-EVAA!” hair dye, getting some length on her mane, and adopting a more feminine attitude, but let’s not kid ourselves on such a rational change in short order.
The guy is even worse off. After 5 years or so in this arrangement the anger will slowly but surely peak to the surface in a fit of passive-aggresive rage. The ensuing breakup will leave him stuck for ages in incel status.
If she doesn’t care if I had sex with other women and she cleaned my house, it might not be so bad. If you won’t have sex its only fair. Personally I want to keep having sex with young girls, but I don’t want to spend time with teenagers, I could see this working for me.
The guy is fucked up.
As for female asexuality, research shows that 15% of women are unable to orgasm via any means. 15% is a significant minority. If such women are unable to orgasm, then being asexual isn’t such a stretch.
Now, there is no research that has demonstrated that physically healthy males cannot get off. Therefore males that claim to be asexual are likely lying.
The writing on this one was particularly good. Great post.
He may either be the victim of incredibly low testosterone (biological or environmental) or he is delusional. He probably thinks that by staying with her, she will recognize him as a loving and non-threatening man and eventually open her legs to him.
People who are asexual or are “sexual and in a relationship with an asexual, usually are perfectly normal people with no hormonal defects and are not delusional. And some people don’t need to have sex in a relationship, and from the sound of the original article, he doesn’t want to get in her pants because she doesn’t want him in her pants and never will.
Britain is full of beta wankers. It doesn’t surprise me one bit that she has never met a guy who made her think about sex.
Look at her little cuntish face. She just enjoys the power trip and the attention. Look at her fucking rainbow haircut for fucks sake. Just another attention whore…move along
This girl looks like a feminist. Maybe that’s why she’s asexual … But most likely she’s just too young to think about sex.
Asexual erasure at the max right here. Some people don’t experience sexual attraction, get over it.
One reason why betas allow themselves to be LFBFed and used as emotional tampons in perpetuity is that it relieves them of the stress of sacking up and busting a move. You could call it cockooning.
Also a direct result of feminist indoctrination. From early childhood guys like this are told to downplay their masculinity, women are all-powerful/virtuos/etc., and that what they want (young, hot women) is a threat to humanity.
The result is that they fear women and believe them to be far superior. In their minds approaching an genuine 7 on the hotness scale would be like approaching a human god and asking her on a date.
I’m sure there are those who are truly asexual. Whether or not that is the case here remains unseen.
What is for sure, though, is that this guy is a total omega and/or a closet gay.
It would be an interesting(though unethical) experiment to raise a girl exclusively around pansy beta men and prohibit any knowledge of masculine essence and see how that effects her sexuality. Would she simply not develop strong sexual urges in this case or would she become attracted to the least feminine men around her?(Even if those men would be considered candy-asses in the real world)
If a tree falls in a forest, does it make a sound?
One reason why betas allow themselves to be LFBFed and used as emotional tampons in perpetuity is that it relieves them of the stress of sacking up and busting a move. You could call it cockooning.
Right on.
As you see he looking away from the camera, you can sense an avoidant type of personality.
Good Lord, that fucking perky rainbow-headed cunt needs to be fucked till she dies.
This is one who will grasp reality only when her minute, pink asshole is dilated to grapefruit size by a fat greased cock.
She needs to talk to me, this fucking sweet little bitch.
Good Lord, that fucking perky rainbow-headed cunt needs to be fucked till she dies. This is one who will grasp reality only when her minute, pink asshole is dilated to grapefruit size by a fat greased cock. She needs to talk to me, this fucking sweet little bitch.
Some chicks’ clits just don’t work right – for whatever reason [and G*d bless their poor starving little souls], they simply cannot have orgasms.
And, of course, these kinds of chicks always seem to be too dull and too uninspired – or just too wholly immersed in feminazi critical theory – to summon the strength of character to FAKE an orgasm.
But trust me, f*cking a non-orgasmic chick is far, far, far worse than just staying at home, whacking off into a towel, and getting a good night’s sleep.
Bonus Points: You don’t have to suffer the next morning’s hangover.
There are women who’ve had the clitoris removed and still come like pigs.
What you need to do with an “asexual” or “non-orgasmic” female is simple: you need to tease them at great enraging length and activate the deepest female gene, that one that shines for filth and depravity.
These unexploded females need a man who understands their hunger for obscenity.
This won’t happen to them with a nice Jewish boy like we see above.
Well, maybe she doesn’t want to be “fucked till she dies” and perhaps you should take what a woman wants into consideration and stop making incredibly creepy comments.
She wants to be fucked till she dies, and, I fear, so do you. Now, what are your *true* measurements?
Don’t lie to me.
Not related, but something I wanted to toss out:
http://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2012/02/the-new-charles-murray-book.html#comments
This is the “safe” way of saying “feminism was bad for the country.” This is a relatively moderate site, and one of the biggest in the economics sphere.
The first time these topics came up, was MR linking to CH.
CH ushered in one hell of a social revolution, considering he was just a guy who made a blog to make fun of betas.
“This is the problem with the modern, equalist society: nothing is wrong with anything.”
Except with those argues that there is something wrong with that kind of society, and are able to prove it.
… those who argue that…
Alpha of the month
Married 50yo Costa concordia captain who is behind bars but 25 yo dancer domnica cemortan is “in love” with him
Shippwreck/manslaughter game !
If by “Alpha” you mean insecure dumbass who fucked-up a luxury kiner and get a bunch of people killed to try and get into some skank’s pants, sure.
I noticed that as well. Manslaughter game enters the lexicon.
OT Note the pathetically framed comments to an article “Sex Life Differences Between Republicans and Democrats”
http://dailycaller.com/2012/02/02/study-probes-sex-habits-of-republicans-and-democrats/
The Francesco Schettino story is just beyond parody for anyone who gets the joke (as Sailer would put it), because almost every single dirty cliché gets prime airtime and validation, at least, if you’re paying attention.
Here’s a 50yo portly guy who steers a cruise ship into Atlantis, blames this on anything but himself, then tries to secretly escape by diving into some life boat (later telling the media he ‘fell into it’), while not informing the hapless passengers. Around a dozen of passengers die because of this. So, not soon after these grotesque sins of irresponsibility, unheard cowardice and malign negligence he gets arrested and… he gets publicly defended by both his wife and 25yo blond ballerina Moldovian mistress who claims to ‘love him’.
Yeah.
For real.
Newton, by almost all accounts, was strictly asexual and died a virgin. A recurring theme on this blog is that the repression of sexuality behooves the forces of civilization. It’s harder to think of one who added more to civilization than Newton.
And Walt Disney was a high school drop-out.
Next.
What’s the point of the rainbow colored hair if she’s not trying to attract sexual attention? I would expect a true asexual to be more frumpy.
Answer: She isn’t truly asexual. Any amount of care for appearance means her gonads are intact. The haircut is about defiance, not to discourage attention, obviously. Generally women who mutilate themselves had low self-esteem in adolescence, i.e. loser debutantes to the sexual marketplace; the culture of female defiance provides them with an easy style for their pathological low self-esteem, which is only worsened by ugly hairdos, piercings and the like, thus reinforcing the aversion from self and sexual intimacy.
If this behavior could speak, it would say: “I’m ugly so I’ll make myself uglier and pretend I don’t want the attention I think I don’t deserve.”
Thanks to cradle-to-grave pandering in Western society, she is enabled to spend her life indoors, safe from chance encounters with cocks that might act as jackhammer to her bedrock of inhibition.
Me too.
Hell, she’s cute… I’d do her, hard and make her feel it for once.
Personally I don’t see how rainbow colored, short, unruly hair cut in an unflattering manner could attract anyone’s sexual attention, unless maybe someone from the LGBT crowd. I think she just uses her hair as a way of further emphasizing her ‘special (asexual! lookatmehowcoolami!) snowflake’ status.
Or maybe she just likes having rainbow hair.
Or maybe she’s just an attention whoring special snowflake.
Just because someone is not trying to attract people doesn’t mean they have no desire to dress or appear in a way that pleases them. It is entirely possible that they dress that way for their own personal approval as opposed to the approval of others.
A girl can be an attention whore without being a sexual whore.
Agreed.
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.
I dated a girl like this (well, saw her 3 times). She was 22 years old. So fucking reserved and .. cold. We ended up screwing the 3rd time “because [she] wanted to see what all the fuss about sex was”. I thought it’d be an “ahhhhhh yeah, I gotttt it” conquest moment. Instead it was this…odd, passionless, awkward fuck.. the most mechanical bang I’ve ever done. Afterwards, I GTFO with an uncomfortable distaste in my mouth. Turns out she later turned into a raging whore.
So yeah, under the calm veneer of sanity this rainbow haired rocker-grrrl chick wears, I can assure you there is some *serious* crazy brewing underneath.
…the perfect storm.
Because obviously your experience is paramount.
No, some people who identify as asexual never change.
*sigh let me guess.. another female that believes there are no trends… that everyone is a unique little snowflake, with their behavior being representative of no one but their individual selves.
grow the fuck up.
ppl are predictable and repetitively unique at best. Once a dick penetrates her sacred little cunt and the temple of joyous purity she’s built up in her mind crumbles, the raging slut-demons trapped within shall escape and reap havoc
in which case we’ll probably see her in a homemade gangbang porn 3 years from now. or maybe her and her pathetic sub-male boyfriend will get into cuckold loving where he’ll gaze into her eyes soulfully while another dude raw dogs her cunt from behind
@ Michael:
“We ended up screwing the 3rd time “because [she] wanted to see what all the fuss about sex was”.”
You must have cringed hard (and laughed your ass off) when a TWENTY-TWO YEAR OLD GIRL deigned to descend from her throne to “see what all the fuss…was” regarding one of the most powerful and creative forces of human existence. For you see, it is only we–the unwashed masses, the unenlightened riff raff–who would engage in such dreadful pursuit!
“So yeah, under the calm veneer of sanity this rainbow haired rocker-grrrl chick wears, I can assure you there is some *serious* crazy brewing underneath.”
Oh baby, it’s a-comin’!
Timmy apparently needs to take Rainbow Dull to a rave and feed her a few hits of X..give the old id a bit of kickstart.
He’d probably just show up wearing androgynous raver cloths and calling himself something gay like Star Baby… not even X could give a girl a warm and fuzzy over a dumbass like this.
But, yea.. he IS only a kid. Give him time. Even a pitiful Beta like this can become a man, given a drastic enough event (walking in on her getting gangbanged?)
“given a drastic enough event ”
Take a good look at Rainbow Dull.
It’s only a matter of time, my friend.
The title of this article should be “OMEGA OF THE MONTH”!!! This guy is well below beta. He might be lying, but I doubt it. He’s not even trying and failing. He’s much worse. He’s not trying and failing. It’s ok in only one way to be an omega because not everyone can win, and someone has to lose. Life isn’t fair, and I don’t disrespect, despise or otherwise think ill of omegas. However,when you fail to try, I do think ill of you. At the very least he should save his money, visit Amsterdam and fuck whores. I’d respect him more for that then what he’s currently doing.
Agreed. He is the OOTM, not BOTM. Betas typically do have a sex drive and want their ladies to have a sex drive too (even if she’s satisfying it with other men).
To be honest, we lose sight of a very simple fact: perspective tends to adapt to circumstance.
the human mind is dynamic like that; facilitative psychological mechanisms that adapt our emotions, perceptions and mind frames in light of varying stimuli are part of the mind’s wirings.
In his eyes, I’m sure he believes… i mean, TRULY BELIEVES, what he says.
all those white knights out there believe in the purity myth, man. they usually aren’t faking it.
Most guys need to learn the hard way
A couple tales of emasculated men I know of:
A friend of a friend of mine who is your quintessential manic pixie dream girl has been dating her boyfriend for over two years and she JUST had sex with him a couple weeks ago. The girl (age 22) candidly admits that she doesn’t see them being together in the long run yet he maintains that she’s his future wife.
A girl (age 23) who I’m acquainted with from university began dating her boyfriend who was a virgin at age 20 last year. The guy fell head over heals in love with her and would routinely shower her with extensive gifts and limitless affection despite the fact she made him wait several months before they had sex. The most fucked up part is that she simultaneously maintained a relationship with her wealthy sugar daddy who was a research professor at our Uni. To make matters worse, her boyfriend knew the entire time, but the only protestation he could muster up was passively aggressively asking her to end the relationship, which in response she’d lie and say she will until the next time he’ll find evidence that she didn’t end it.
The relationship with the sugar daddy prof finally ended when she found out she contracted an std – albeit curable – from him in which she passed to her boyfriend who as I mentioned was a virgin before meeting her. After finding out, he broke up with her for a few days, but of course ended up getting back with her because he “loves her SO much.”
Again, most guys clearly need to learn the hard way. It’s a pity.
It’s Britain, no wonder she’s asexual. You’d probably have to go a hundred miles before you could find a single Alpha.
trew dat
A man who uses phrases such as, “I’ve not been one to … “, nevermind the ensuing betatude, is hopeless by the very stuff of which he is made.
True, the British Bulldog has been long neutered, I’m afraid.
Jenni’s relationship with Tim does have a physical side, as they cuddle and kiss to express their affection for each other.
If she was really asexual, she wouldn’t have any reason to desire affection from the opposite sex. It looks like she’s just a frigid cunt selfishly using a sackless loser for her emotional gratification. They deserve each other.
Also, is it just me, or is every man named “Tim” on the planet a cringing eunuch with a face like a squirrel?
Which one is the male? They could both be. That probably explains a lot. From my experience, young single girls with really short hair tend to be a little “off”.
They also tend to be freaky in bed, which was probably what he was hoping… although not quite this way.
Very good point. You will also notice that it is the most needy, soft and feminine of men who are attracted to these closet cases. Generally, the men will love adoringly and the women will loathe the partner’s nature.
No asshole short hair is quite often seen as a symbol that women are discontent with society. So, basically, they’re not blind to your ignorance. Sucks for you.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
I never thought I’d see a hamster break the sound barrier.
Look, baby, “asshole short hair” is intolerable; either grow it out and braid it, or shave it the fuck off.
I don’t need to get stubble-burned by a feminist shithole.
Congratulations. Through the muck and mire of the putrifying flesh of the land whales posted, the omegas that marry them, and the supllicating white knight beta bitches that make excuses for them, you’ve found one whose hole is so deep that the rotting rescesses of billion year old cum splatter over the constant bacterial hydration provided by his pathetic and flayed soul’s weeping has produced a stench so foul that it overpowers the smell of moldy testosteronated femcunt and menstration soaked mangina that I slog through on a daily basis and has made me physically ill. I want to find this man, put him in a room with a gun on the table loaded with a single bullet (it’d have to be a fucking .22, since there’s no way his estrogen atrophied muscles could handle even a the pussy non kicking NATO issue Glock 9mm) right next to a picture of his cockteasing dyketronic. On the back wall right in front of him, in big ol’ black and bloody letters ten feet tall, the message: ETERNITY with a wide screen TV right in the center.
Why the Tv, you ask? That’d be where I’d pipe in the feed of the bets I was taking on how long it’d be before he shot himself along with full HD view of the cunt of his ‘asexual’ cuntalicious thingfriend getting a train run on her while she screams to the world how much she fucking loves the cock reaming she’s getting.
“… I did know enough not to make assumptions about what that meant.”
That’s the problem right there. Somebody who refuses to make any “assumptions” (smart people call these “judgements”) has no backbone. Keeping an open mind about EVERYTHING means you never have to make a judgement, take a stand or fight. It’s Beta all the way.
A woman saying “I’m asexual” should create two reactions. First, “What the fuck is wrong with her?” followed closely by, “Not going to waste anymore time here”. Any other reaction is wrong.
A FUCKING PLUS BRAH
A woman stated she is asexual should be respected and not treated like some diseased creature, and maybe if you really can’t go without sex, some asexuals with compromise and have sex (not diminishing their asexual identity since asexuality is about lack of sexual attraction rather than libido), or some asexals are willing to be in an open relationship. Either way, asexuals people (and people in general) should be respected.
You can start by respecting the spirit of this forum and shut that gaping maw under your nose, toots.
Maybe I am just a little wierd, but I can so imagine pumping the hell out of her from behind while he sits in front holding her hand and staring tearfully into her eyes.
Wow, such anger. Simmer down there, Casanova. Yeah, you finally met a chick you can’t dig your vile claws into, just deal.
lol. The beta is strong with this one.
P.S. the article was making fun of the beta with her, not her.
^This.
Wrong. The point of the post isn’t about wanting to screw this girl. It’s about the effect of PC non-judgmentalism on Western Civilization.
Definitely.
I wont be surprised is SHE is taking some serious black cock on the side.
Yeah she’s asexual which means NO sex. Well done.
Yes,
….and Bill Clinton was married, which means no adultery.
….and dozens of child abusers were Catholic priests, which means a strict vow of celibacy.
….and Amy Winehouse went to rehab which meant no drugs, and definitely no overdosing on anything.
Tell me, do you always believe what you are told?
You’re replying to Harpies Bizarre why?
If a woman lets a guy repeatedly bone her without committing to a relationship we say she has low self-esteem and advise her to get the fuck out because he obviously doesn’t give a shit about her.
This is that, but the other way around, and Tim should be advised accordingly.
Or maybe we should let people do whatever they want in a healthy relationship and get out of people’s personal lives.
Show us a healthy relationship and we’ll stay out of it, harridan.
She will ride the cock of an outlaw biker rapper quarterback one night in an explosion of drunken passion. She will be choke-fucked, take it up the ass and swallow. He will learn of it, rationalize it as a “side effect” of her “condition” and continue being a sexless gooftard.
LOL
You guys can have her. She’s a lucky charm.
Heh, without the “magically delicious” part. Good one.
This girl is only asexual with this beta chump. She’s not some vestal virgin. She’s probably been accidentally railed with alpha dick, and asshole game to the point of ruin. Realizing that someone of her caliber is unlikely to be privy to alpha affections in the foreseeable future, she’s hanging out on standby. She won’t say a word to beta boy when she finally moves on to greener pastures, and when he finds out she’s taking it in the ass from a trash collector who pulls her hair, he’ll be devastated.
No, if she identifies as asexual she is not having sex, period. Nor does she desire it. And hopefully she will never change. Not with any men, or women, or any gender binary. Stop being so discriminatory.
Oh my, guys… I think we just got scolded by Kate Bush-less.
Jeez, even lesbians like dildos… and she doesn’t just let him do her because “he seems to like it,” at least. Sheesh. World’s biggest cock-tease. Watch, in five years, she’ll be taking multiple BBC (big black cock) creampies while he watches and STILL won’t let him get off with her– that’s her jollies she’s getting already (power).
Or maybe she doesn’t want sex and we should respect that. Assuming that all lesbians like dildos is an asinine assumption to make of an entire group.
Hey, if she likes orgasms, she’s not asexual.
Agreed with Jason on this one. Gal is undoubtedly getting some side action, she’d not be “asexual” with say, Russell Brand. Or whatever bad boy floated her boat. Asexuals don’t have rainbow hair advertising “I’m easy” nor do they maintain slender physiques. The guy is probably so low in ability to pull women he figures this is the best he can get.
And yeah, she’s probably pining for that Alpha that had her first.
“….nor do they maintain slender physiques.”
Er, do you think everyone is naturally predisposed to be fat, and all thin people are deliberately working to keep themselves that way?
Some people are naturally skinny. I’ve known plenty of people who could eat all day and stay thin as a rail.
I cannot help but wonder how this story got to the front page of big-time media. Did the media folks put out ads requesting true-life stories of asexual babes with rainbow hair to which this couple responded? Did this couple make the contact to sell a story? I am having trouble seeing this as anything but a tabloid scam because I cannot sort out any believable real-life motivations here. Maybe she is an attention whore and he is deeply clueless – OK, that I get. But how did this weird little tragedy get thrown up on the main stage?
If there is something like asexuality it most certainly is related to very low T or abnormal T receptors. That glint in her eye does not remind me of low T girls but I could be wrong.
“Testosterone puts ego in driver’s seat.”
Testosterone can skew one’s judgement, creating the impression that decisions are best taken alone even in situations that call for collaboration, according to a new study.
In a clever set of experiments, scientists led by Nicholas Wright at the University of London showed that women given a dose of testosterone become less inclined to act in concert even when it was clearly in their interest to do so.
Finding the right balance between working together and going solo, and knowing when to do one or the other, is an essential life skill.
In some circumstances, joining forces with others is the best way to achieve a desired result: that’s why lions and hyenas hunt in packs, and why humans cooperate on the playing field, in the laboratory, or in battle.
But sometimes decisive individual action is needed to break free of group-think, or to come out ahead of the game.
To a significant extent, our ability to navigate between these two extremes is acquired through learning and experience, but some of these impulses are hardwired too.
Earlier research, for example, on the biological underpinnings of group decision making revealed that a naturally-occurring hormone, oxytocin, promotes the urge to work side-by-side.
At the same time, it was well established that testosterone boosted risk-taking, anti-social behaviour and the kind of aggressiveness that fuels contact sports and trading floors on Wall Street.
But whether the alpha male hormone par excellence, also present at much lower levels in females, also makes individuals shun cooperation and become more egocentric was not known.
To find out, Wright and his colleagues carried out a series of tests over two days, spaced a week apart, with 17 pairs of women volunteers who did not know each other.
Their results appear today in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
Putting the ego in charge
On one of the two days, both volunteers in each pair were given a testosterone supplement, while on the other day they ingested a look-alike placebo.
The researchers chose females because in men an additional dose has the effect of suppressing production of the hormone by the body.
During the experiment, both women in each pairing sat in the same room, but in front of separate computer screens.
The women were shown the same two images, and asked to pick the one in which a hard-to-discern high-contrast pattern appeared. If their individual choices agreed, the exercise ended there.
But if they diverged, the women were told to consult with each other and reach a joint decision.
Pairs of women who had taken the dummy pill were significantly more successful in coming up with the right answer than those pairs who had been given the hormone, the researchers found.
“The higher levels of testosterone were associated with individuals behaving egocentrically and deciding in favour of their own selection over their partner’s,” even when that choice was wrong, says Wright.
“Too much testosterone can help blind us to other people’s views,” he says. “This can be very significant when we are talking about a dominant individual trying to assert his or her opinion in, say, a jury.”
The broader conclusion, he adds, is that hormonal levels can disrupt our attempts to work together.
from: http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/02/01/3420731.htm
***shudder***
back in his younger days moses used to try “nice guy” game to get girls to open their legs. never worked. ever.
thank the Lord for game.
I love posts like this on this blog – it’s funny to see this guy being so annoyed at seeing people he doesn’t approve of being happy.
[heartiste: was the roman centurion annoyed when he was whipping jesus?]
Look at that chick. She’s definitely cute (can’t see much below her collarbone). I have a feeling she’s not “asexual” so much as “having sex with some other dude.”
Yeah, she’s asexual… only fucks other asexuals.
“And is it my imagination, or is the ratio of white and asian beta to alpha getting more skewed every year? Welcome to Generation Puffboy.”
I think younger generations of men are definitely more beta. Thing is, most younger men have been raised in a feminist era where they have, from a young age, been constantly bombarded with the message that men are evil abusers, that everything male including male sexuality is bad, and that they must essentially act against standard male behavior in order to be a decent human being. A larger proportion of younger men were also raised in divorced or single mother homes, and so they are more likely to have been emasculated by overbearing mothers.
As a result of all this, many younger men feel that they have to make more effort to appear to be nice and non-threatening to women. The net result is castrated, milquetoast betadom.
I think you nailed it Nick
That guy makes me want to puke. What a loser.
So, seeing someone in a happy relationship makes you puke? And happiness makes someone a loser?
His DNA will be the loser.
I doubt he’s that happy. He’s just taking what he can get.
Pretending to not be interested in sex is often a kind of shit-test that women run on men in order to flush out who are the naive betas who still believe in the comforting lies of women’s mother Mary purity, and can therefore be used and strung along in the hope of eventually getting some, while the same women will often screw bad boys on the sly.
Yeah, he’ll walk in her on one day after wanking it in desperation to find her screaming “Fuck me, fuck me with you big cock!” with some stud or two.
Slightly off-topic, but our friend Niecy is back. Has a Yahoo! piece on…
What Makes a Woman Wife Material?
http://screen.yahoo.com/what-makes-a-woman-wife-material-28079621.html
1,100 comments so far.
The rainbow hair, badge of attention whore freakdom. Run away! Run far, far, away!
This is the proper voice and behavior of a woman who is truly feminine; just listen to her voice and demeanor:
Is my man alpha or beta? I’d classify him as an alpha but I’m biased.
He is:
a 57-y/o trial attorney and former mayor; local legend
Republican
Italian/Irish
never married or sired children
chess champion
smokes tobacco from a pipe (hugely unpopular in this area)
has a v resonant hypnotic voice (pure testosterone/the way OT Jehovah’s voice would sound, forget The Ten Commandments)
140+ IQ
5’8″
composite of Arthur Miller, Dawkins, and a young/thin Kissinger wrt looks
is the best (and priciest) lawyer in the region
works 100+ hours/week
inhumanly virile, gets hard at the sound of my voice; his dick is like a steel rod encased in flesh (doesn’t need Viagra)
looks like an uptight, repressed Republican, fucks like he’d win the gold medal in the Porn Star Olympics
will inherit millions when his mother dies
For the possibly beta category:
Says he’s in love w/me after 6 months of dating
Proposed to me; marriage slated for August (has never proposed to anybody before now)
Actively trying to impregnate me; wants a son
Paid for a dozen dates before finally fucking me (he could have had me on the second date; every other man had to jump through hoops for 4-6 months)
His last few girlfriends were no more than 10 years younger than himself (I’m 30 years younger)
Me:
27
right-leaning Libertarian (Ron Paul doesn’t stand a chance; it’ll be Romney vs. Obama; Obama will win unless he gets caught on tape blowing a 10-year old Boy Scout)
right brain dominant
high IQ and educated but dirt poor
no children or previous marriages but 1 engagement
upper middle class family background
have exclusively dated doctors & lawyers
Slavic ancestry
no tattoos, non-smoker, non-drinker
introverted
antifeminist
all of the markers of a gold-digger
would gladly sign a pre-nup for him if he asks me to
was aware of/idolized this man from afar for 5 years before dating him; I feel like a Beatles fantard who grew up, lucked out and got engaged to a Beatle
was frigid before fucking him, now I do things in bed I wouldn’t have dreamed of before being w/him (fake-rape, getting choked/slapped, assfucking, getting defiled by sperm in every orifice, fucking on every desk in his building including the state representative’s, etc.) and I love it
He has the kind of facial proportions that drive me nuts, Brown wide-set eyes, bushy eyebrows, narrow mouth with lips set in a permasmirk, dimpled chin, an elegant philtrum if there ever was one. The nose tip-to-upper lip ratio fits my ideal (more of a long nose than short). His profile is what drives me nuts. He has a very distinctively masculine Roman profile.
The first glimpse I ever had of him was in profile in fact. He was puffing on a pipe (not a pretentious affectation like I first thought but the pipe is his trademark) and looked grouchy and pompous. He exuded scholarly superciliousness and Oscar the Grouch sex appeal. He was intoxicated and arguing politics with another older gentleman. I was captivated (when I was a teenager my peers watched reality shows on MTV…I watched C-SPAN….half soft core porn (when the Republicans were speaking) and half court jester farce (when Barney Frank was sputtering spittle/lisping).but too intimidated to approach him. For five years.
.
The steamy chemistry we have is like nothing I’ve ever felt w/any other man. I think he is the first authentic alpha male I’ve encountered and that’s why I’m seeing stars. The first time we brushed fingers I felt a jolt of electricity. If he isn’t alpha who is?
I’m not objective when it comes to this GOD of a man so I’ll let the masters of this blog do the appraisal if they are so inclined.
Yup. He’s an alpha.
I’d say your hard-running hamster, no doubt exhausted from this email, tells the whole story.
subthread winner
You write like a guy, but assuming you’re not a fat fuck trolling from his mom’s basement:
Alpha is what women like if they’re not intoxicated by love and the pill.
If you’re saying he’s alpha, then he’s probably alpha.
Paying for dates is the right old school way of doing things. He doesn’t get minus points for that.
You don’t sound like a heavy shit-tester. But does he pass your shit tests? Does he take charge in the relationship? Does he act aloof most of the time? Does he take everything that you say seriously (that’s bad)? Do you face female competition over him?
Anyway, he sounds like a keeper. Don’t blow it by acting like a selfish cunt.
Yes, he’s Alpha… and not just “Alpha,” he actually has character and morals as part of his strength. Don’t mistake being civilized with chump, ever, with this one.
maybe she’s rich. or her parents are
You have to be a real sucker to willingly commit to a lifestyle of no sex ever, while still offering your time, affection, and resources just to be endlessly teased.
He probably justifies accepting the celibacy for her with “she has a great personality and I love her,” which is code for “she’s the only non-hog actually interested in me.” He accepts her dysfunction purely because he doesn’t want to be lonely but is also too afraid to leave his comfort zone and approach women who actually have sex.
But thinking about it, if you’re a lame beta there are advantages to dating an asexual woman over a normal woman. If her condition is legitimate, she won’t be out banging alphas. And if she does for some reason (i.e. she lied), and gets pregnant, he’ll know for sure that he bears no link to the bastard spawn.
As any man trapped in a comatose marriage can tell you, it’s not like a guy this beta would be getting much (if any) sex from a normal girlfriend anyway. Difference is that your average guy in a sexless relationship can’t fall back on “she’s asexual” to cope; they just have to accept the cold fact that their woman is sexually unattracted to them personally.
Could not read past the first paragraphs.. claustrophobia set in.
My current girl was an asexual freak. Even after taking her virginity I found no option but to date around. Even took a different live-in for a while.
I had thought she was a hopeless lost cause who could never learn – or at least could never learn enough. Surprisingly, she did become orgasmic, and she regularly initiates sex now.
But still, sex freaks are not made from asexual freaks.
A second apartment is again in order, as I’m a man who needs at least one full out sex freak as a regular.
http://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/02/11440/male-and-female-behavior-deconstructed
Deconstructed in a scientific/genetic sense, not a bullshit post-modern new age hamster sense.
And the text version;
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-02/cp-sbt012712.php
This article is borderline abusive,
[heartiste: it is required.]
sexist,
[correction: asexist.]
misogynist,
[actually, it’s more misandrist than misogynist, but don’t let that spoil a good mental narrative.]
and contains massive and sickening amounts of rape culture.
[why have you raped my culture with your hurtful comment?]
What the hell are you thinking by writing this?
[“i wonder if i hit the mark? yep, sounds like i did.”]
Are you for real!?
[more real than real.]
There’s probably some racism and homophobia in there too. I just can’t be bothered to check.
Wow, so you guys honestly can’t imagine that some people just plain don’t want to have sex? Seriously? Not only that, but you then proceed to cast aspersions on affairs, gender identity, and HAIRSTYLE of all things, and in general act like anyone who doesn’t want sex or is willing to forego sex for romance must be less than human? I see betas here, but they’re not in the article.
I don’t understand why people here are so threatened by this woman not wishing to have sex. Are we personally offended because, /oh no/, someone doesn’t want our magic cock? Do our lives and courtesy and basic decency fall apart because we’re too insecure to accept that some people just won’t want to have sex with us, bottom line? Why does it bother us so deeply that we have to say such nasty things about her? How /dare she/ do whatever the fuck she wants in bed.
But hey, I don’t plan to stick around for a debate. I’m merely going to ask you that you examine the fact that some of you have wished rape on a girl because she doesn’t want to have sex.
Disdaining and/or mocking the abnormal does not constitute feeling threatened…
That’s the impotent shaming language your twink professors taught you in Gender Studies 101… but it doesn’t fly here, where we talk turkey.
I actually believe in asexuals.
[heartiste: it’s written in the bible.]
You guys need to stop bashing her,
[what about the guy getting bashed? does he not merit your everflowing sympathy?]
just because y’all think with your crotches doesn’t mean everyone does.
[“hi, i’m an asexual because i’m better than fornicators. i don’t think with my crotch like all those coitusnormative people do. see? watch me not think with my crotch! still not crotch-thinking. ha, losers!”]
Some people are just not interested in sex, and no, those people don’t NEED to have sex to determine that.
[i notice your email addy is princesspinkpanda. have you thought that perhaps your love of princess pink pandas and your fear of normal human sexual contact are related?]
She’s too young to have sex, I believe that she will change her mind in a few years.
You say that like “I do believe in fairies.”
HAHA Fuck you.
Not literally, because I’m ace.
Some asexuals actually DO feel sexual desire. It’s just not sexual attraction TO any person. Asexuals may masturbate and even watch porn, and still be considered asexuals. There is a difference between the orientation asexuality, celibacy, and lack of sex drive caused by medical reasons. Asexual people are often quite comfortable with the fact that they don’t find anyone sexually attractive. They might find them beautiful or handsome, they just don’t want to sleep with them. Some asexuals in relationships with sexual partners do have sex. It’s not that the asexual person is sexually attracted to them in a lust sort of way, it’s that it makes their partner happy and it’s an intimate thing.
Some people wouldn’t want to be in a relationship like this. That’s fine. That’s their choice. But some people do. If this guy loves her and values her for more than just her genitalia, then he doesn’t mind that she’s not a sexual person.
Please inform yourself before continuing to make acephobic (incidentally, asexuality falls under the LGBTQQIA umbrella, so it’s not that different from saying that about gay people, don’t know what your take on that is) and hideously sexist remarks.
(incidentally, asexuality falls under the LGBTQQIA umbrella…
Cue Ralph Kramden: “WHHHHOOOOOAAAA, what surprise!”
I was completely disgusted by the tone of this article.
[heartiste: i am disgusted by the tone of your comment.]
As a sexual person, asexuality is valid.
[so is necrophilia. (ya gotta love that leftard mincing weasel word “valid”. one of those words that means so little in most contexts yet the person saying it thinks means so much.)]
Also fuck you.
[redirect to: jenni.]
“Fuck you?” Well, if you’re female and cute, maybe…
Lol @ rainbow hair
What the hell is wrong with you people?
[heartiste: your silly posturing.]
Asexuality is a legitimate orientation.
[legitimate != normal. or healthy. or immunity to mockery.]
Let me put it like this: Assuming you’re a straight man, how do you feel towards other men?
[they make useful cannon fodder.]
Now imagine all women inexplainably vanish overnight.
[fleshlight sales skyrocket!]
Everyone else just becomes gay and claims that’s the natural way of things, which confuses the hell out of you.
[and here is where you take a wrong turn down false premise lane. most of the remaining men would likely not become gay. not without some severe and untidy coercion at any rate.]
Would you suddenly start craving gay sex?
[no, but neither would i pretend my sexual desire for women was nonexistent.]
Would being raped by another man (an “attractive and manly Alpha”, of course) “set you right”? No?
Then why are you assuming this is the case with asexuals?
[because most asexuals, judging by their neuroses and life circumstances (see post) are heterosexuals with heterosexual romantic needs who have psychological barriers preventing them from experiencing physical intimacy with another human being. they are broken. so in an effort to justify their brokenness, they surround themselves with weak, harmless, spineless, plushboys like little timmy who don’t threaten the sanctity of their secret garden of unearthly escape.]
They are just people who feel towards everyone the way straight people feel about the same sex. What about that is so hard to accept?
[reread the post for comprehension. i did write that i accept that a number of asexuals may have something wrong with their brains that has completely shut down their sexual drive. but if that is the case, then these congenital asexuals need to come to grips with the fact that they are not normal, will never be seen as normal by normal people, and are utter dead ends in an evolutionary sense.
but my guess is that most “asexual” women just get a power rush from keeping weak-willed men in a constant state of blue ballitis, and fear the vulnerability that they will not be able to control in the presence of a strong, sexy man.
asexual men are probably just gay homos who can’t come to terms with it. or nerdos with all their testosterone sucked out by the terrycloth fabric of their my little pony costumes.]
I have zero issues with asexual nature. I just think the guy’s a dweeb for putting up with it …and being public about it!
I am disgusted and heartbroken at not only the content of this article, but the comments being made on it. You have NO RIGHT to claim what is normal and what is abnormal in the ways of human sexuality, and to do so in such a public forum makes you the lowest of the low, in my opinion. You are promoting acephobia and rape culture. Who. Gave. You. The. Right?
You want facts? Here are some. Sex isn’t the be all, end all to life Couples (and I mean real couples, not one you saw on an episode of House, which was, incidentally, also extremely acephobic and lacking in anything the way of a proper explanation regarding asexual behaviour) do not always have to have sex. Many are just fine being a committed, loving relationship that does not involve sex. It sounds trite, but it’s true. Do not try to project your alpha-beta shit to the world without even the basic facts to back it up.
Okak, who pingbacked this post to Disgusted and Heartbroken Women’s website? Lol. This should be an interesting day…
Shut up whore.
“Who. Gave. You. The. Right?”. The Bill of Rights, read it sometime. What gives you the right to weep all over this fine thread?
“? Here are some. Sex isn’t the be all, end all to life”
Since the primary purpose of sex is reproduction, I suggest you go back to school and take some biology courses.
You understand that “normal” is essentially a statistical term right? Therefore heterosexual sex is normal and asexuality is abnormal, that is statistically the case.
Sex isn’t the “be all and end all” – food and water are pretty good too. Still, man cannot live by bread alone…
it’s rather easy to tell what’s normal and what’s abnormal sexual behavior. normal sexual behavior is the procreative, monogamish heterosexual practice that sustains our existence as a species and is practiced by the vast majority of humanity. abnormal sexual behavior is anything practiced by a minority of adherents, including gay sex, pickup mastery, rape, dogfucking, various kinks, and asexual behavior. this is derived from the definition of ‘normal,’ which is “the usual, average, or typical state of a condition.”
‘normal’ contains no emotional bias. there’s no reason to be ‘disgusted and heartbroken’ by an assertion that something falls outside a statistical center. the bare statement that any minority sexual behavior is abnormal does not contain by itself a value judgment that it is invalid or wrong absent a clear indication that the practice thereof is against a participant’s true wishes or desires.
the self-esteem movement failed on this front by redefining normal to mean acceptable and attempting to expand the inclusive reach of the former. nobody’s fooled.
Oh boy… Just when I thought it couldn’t get any more ridiculous, attempts are now being made to shame us into accepting ‘acephobia’ as a “thing.” Before Sandra’s comment I was unenlightened as to what constituted ‘acephobia’, so I looked into it. Apparently it means something along the lines of “discrimination against” or “hatred of” or “intolerance of” asexuals.
[heartiste: does it cover “making fun of”?]
Now for the REAL treat– check out this excerpt from the website from which I learned ‘acerphobia’s’ meaning:
“To the best of my knowledge, asexuals do not get murdered or arrested or turned away from jobs simply because they don’t experience sexual attraction. Any oppress ion we do experience, we experience because of being members of another group that is oppressed. For example, asexuals who are also transgender individuals experience discrimination against transgender individuals. Asexuals who wish to have romantic partners of the same gender might be read as gay and treated accordingly. And so on.”
Trying to figure out which group deserves the honor of being most oppressed is like trying to find the beginning or the end of a Mobius strip, even for the freaks themselves! I mean, my own thoughts on the matter were initially, “Asexuals are totally gay.” But now I don’t know WHAT to think!
he has every right to claim what’s normal and what’s abnormal in the ways of human sexuality; human sexuality exists for 1 reason. to reproduce. any behavior that goes against this is welcome fodder for ridicule and sneering distaste.
why DO YOU care so much if he judges creepy dudes who are willing to be sexually frustrated, or freakish chicks with intimacy complexes. what’s YOUR agenda?
I love how creepers like you demonize male sexual agencies with little cute buzz phrases like “Rape culture”. men have needs. they want to fuck bitches. such a need evolved….
ur rage is actually beyond reason, although I’m trying
“Many are just fine being a committed, loving relationship that does not involve sex.”
http://www.roommates.com
Hi Sandra. Want to fuck?
Congratulations for writing the most offensive thing I’ve ever read.
[heartiste: please. if this is my most offensive, i’ve disappointed myself.]
I’m actually impressed by the levels of misogyny you’ve reached here.
[what about little timmy? he comes in for more of my abuse than rainbowface. if anything, this post leans more misandrist. but of course you don’t see that. because you have biases you must nurse.]
This is the most awful article I have ever read in my life. How dare you belittle people becuase of there sexual orientation. Thats just who they are. You can’t change it or force a different sexuality upon a person by raping them like people seem to suggest in the comments. The things you’e saying sexually about her is considered harassment and is totally disgusting, you seem to have no respect for this people. But then again you are all cowering behind computer screens, you can say what you think you want with out consequences. But there are consequences. To the person you’re talking, to the people who are asexual and to anyone offended by this. Homosexuality isn’t some caused by some brain disorder, neither is asexuality. Have some god damn respect for different people. You can go around talking about people like this, you wouldn’t like it if it was you. You are going to get lost in a world of acceptance, becuase people are slowly but surely becoming more accepting. I know its hard to think past your opinion but If that guy is staying with her regardless and he is not asexual that is a very, very strong relationship built on love and trust, unlike this article thinking a relationship can’t hold it self together with out sex. It is so sad to see so little education on difference in the world. You’re aloud to be proud for being straight, so its only fair people should be proud of their sexuality too. My advice to you is to sort your disrespectfulness out, educate your self and try you’re very best to be more accepting. Becuase one day you may announce this view in a bar, coffee shop or even on the street and you might just get punched in the face. Becuase people don’t take discrimination hands down anymore. They fight back.
Hahahahahahahaha
You fucking suck
Have some sensitivity
[heartiste: spot the irony.]
instead bashing an entire group of people for something that is NOT A FUCKING CHOICE.
[neither is bloodthirsty psychopathy. but no one coddles psychopaths.]
The whole world does not revolve around sex, my friend.
[actually, it does. sex is the life force of the sentient universe. sex is the alpha and the omega, the cauldron of creation, the pulsating, throbbing, inflamed, veiny foundation upon which all else rises to glory. the second the world stops revolving around sex, is the second the world begins its spiral into the illimitable nothingness of eternal black death and infinite void.]
What you’re doing in this article is like saying that all gay men are just cockteases who are preventing other men from having sex with women
[that’s very lawyerly of you.]
(which is obviously the only thing that matters)
[i dunno about you, but no gay man has ever prevented me from having sex with a woman.]
Also, not to mention, I’m glad you see women as people and not just sexual objects.
[people exist because they are sexual objects. think about it.]
It’s nice to know that about half the world is respected.
[respect’s got nothin’ to do with it.]
also
[wait for it…… waaaaaaait for it…….]
fuck you
[how would you know what that’s like?]
If someone has abnormally low sexual desire – whether for physiological or psychological reasons – and they choose to withdraw from life & sit it out in a quiet corner, it shouldn’t matter to you, it shouldn’t require your intervention. Is the health of the species at stake? Surely from an evolutionary perspective it’s better for people like that to opt out of the gene pool. So why pile on, what is it about these people that threatens you?
FFS people, you’re making fools of yourselves.
First of all, asexuality is lack of SEXUAL ATTRACTION. It does not mean you don’t have sex. Plenty of asexuals do have sex. I have no idea whether the couple featured in the article have sex, and I don’t care.
Second, Tim is a beta/whatever because he actually makes his OWN mind up about what is important for him in a relationship instead of bowing to peer pressure? God, the irony kills me.
Go on, this is priceless.
I was asexual until I was 19 and it totally means you don’t want to screw ANYONE, and you aren’t sexually attracted to anyone. There was a guy I liked at 15, and he liked me (that is what heteroromantic means). But he asked for sex and I thought it was gross. I told him we can be together but he should go fuck other women instead. I was tortured for a week because I liked him, but couldn’t make him happy.
Also, asexuality doesn’t mean you can’t masturbate. Many asexuals do it, but they do it just for fun (it has the same purpose as eating icecream or using a swing – it’s fun), they don’t want to share it with others. Asexuality means you aren’t sexually attracted to anyone, and have no desire for sex. Some asexuals don’t mind having sex if their non-asexual partner asks for it (neutral asexuals) and some think it’s gross (repulsed asexuals, if I remember correctly). Sometimes it’s just the way a person is, without any penis-fear involved.
Although in my case, it really was penis fear. Or actually, it was because my peers convinced me that sex is something boys do TO girls, and if you have it, you’re subjugated, humiliated and degraded. If I only knew that those things were just desires of certain women, not something all guys want to do to you. Undoubtedly some guys ARE like that, but they aren’t that hard to avoid.
Translation from womanese:
“I didn’t meet an alpha until I was 19, every guy I was around before that was too beta to moisten my cunny”
That naughty look in her eye says: ‘I am getting all this attention and I do not have to do ANYTHING in exchange for it, therefore I must be VERY desirable, and my relationship is just permanent courtship’. Then she gets to tell the whole world about it – attention whoring! It is of course the ultimate Fitness Test and cock-block. I am ashamed to think I have fellow-countrymen like her long-suffering Beta of a boyfriend.
My guess is that behind his back she is (and if she is not she soon will be) banging ther local football team, and I imagine he cruises the gay bars for some, ANY, action.
“Evolutionarily speaking, there is something very wrong with you.”
Asperger’s Syndrome has shown to be very dominant over “neurotypical genes”. I am evolutionarily superior to you pitiful neurotypicals. 8)
~Beta Male
Jenni just doesn’t want to grow up. Her expression and pose in that picture (plus the rainbow hair) makes me think she still wishes she were a little girl.
First question to ask any self-professed asexual should be, “Do you masturbate?” If they do, their whole premise dissolves, plain as that.
[heartiste: good point.]
An asexual male is simply a male who’s never learned what game is and how beneficial it is.
[i’ve read that in the animal kingdom among some species the total losers in the mating market will commit suicide to spare the resources of the group. perhaps that is what’s going on with male asexuals.]
what should a girl do if her boyfriend or husband gives her tons of affection but little sex?
Go find a straight man to date/marry.
Provided she isn’t too fat or ugly,
me.
Call me.
buy him the sex god method.
Pick up the phone… see if I’m home.
/your backdoor man
Lose weight
I’m sorry your male ego feels so incredibly threatened
[heartiste: that’s just something losers say to rationalize the ridicule they receive.]
by a small percentage of people who simply aren’t interested in sex, that you have to write an entire article degrading them into freaks of nature.
[if the straitjacket fits…]
You might as well be a sex-crazed primate throwing his fists against his chest.
[it’s sex-crazed primates all the way down.]
If you can’t understand why a guy would stay with a girl that isn’t interested in sex,
[oh, i can understand it. he’s either not attracted to her, or he’s a loser who can’t reach for what he truly desires.]
then you’ve obviously never had a meaningful relationship of your own based on anything beyond the primal urge to procreate.
[is it your contention that a primal urge to procreate precludes relationship meaningfulness?]
Thanks for being a part of rape culture
[fact: people who reflexively spill feminist boilerplate like ‘rape culture’ are part of the stupid culture.]
and the reason women must always be wary of men.
[so here we get to the heart of the matter. asexual chicks have an irrational fear of the penis.]
I just hope your dick is as small as your mind.
[you must feel threatened.
ps do cucumbers send you into hysterical crying fits?]
I am utterly disgusted when people call out people for hypocrisy and insensitivity, then throw an insult aimed at their physical features.
The entire argument loses all credibility when you do this. It’s abhorrently petty.
Well, my brain is the size of a planet, so…
and you know damn well KF is begging for it….
Anyone who unironically uses any of the following phrases automatically gets filed in the “Dumbass with completely worthless opinions” mental folder:
*”rape culture”
*”womyn”
*”the patriarchy”
Most of the people who have left comments here should be fucking ashamed of themselves. I don’t even have words for how disgusting some of these comments are, not to mention the article itself at points. Fuck’s sake.
I just….I…..this is just too fucking pathetic for me to read….dear lord.
Well at least they won’t reproduce to propagate their tainted genes.
Gotta love the part where she gets angry at people for asking her if she was molested. Because telling people you have no sexual desire at all is completely normal and healthy, but trying a logical approach is invasive. Honey, you’re the freak bringing up your freakishness. Don’t be upset at the normal human reaction: trying to understand your freakishness.
That said, chicks like this are usually just scared. Not being the prettiest, they’ve taken the extreme approach and tampered down their sexual desires, afraid of losing a man and having passion to actually attempt it. What’s more, they’re unsatisfied with the men (re: pussy beta boys) around them but have rationalized themselves to the point that they avoid the men they actually like (alpha acting, frattish guys) and claim they don’t like them.
They’re the female equivalent of men who date fat women to “prove” that “lookism” is a “social construct” but can’t get a chubby up.
Most of them, when ovulating, will secretly skank it up at a distant bar and go home with the frattiest alpha around. Then feel guilty about it and pretend asexuality.
Leftism and Feminism and what they’re “supposed” to like can really fuck a girl up.
@ whorefinder:
“Gotta love the part where she gets angry at people for asking her if she was molested. Because telling people you have no sexual desire at all is completely normal and healthy, but trying a logical approach is invasive.”
My thoughts exactly. Did you happen to notice this gem?:
““There are people who definitely view it as a disorder and are like ‘oh if we give you these pills we can fix it’.”
What she’s suggesting beneath the grrrl-power-tainted temper tantrum is that she must have indeed sought a doctor’s diagnosis on her condition; who else could have been the “we” in the role of pill-giver?
Nice to know there are such kind, intelligent, and understanding people out there on the internet. :I
(I’m being sarcastic. You’re all a bunch of asshats.)
The truth is that the Chateau is indeed one of the most kind, intelligent, and understanding sites on the net.
Call us whatever your little pea pickin’ heart pleases, but this is the place where the jaded, heartbroken men of the world come to get the unvarnished truth, rather than the washed-out propaganda your kind spouts off daily.
Game saves lives.
lmao. Poor wittle wiberal. Did we hurt your feelings by not accepting your freakish pussy behavior and rationalizations?
Go stuff another dildo up your ass, boy.
@ Jackson:
“(I’m being sarcastic…)”
Thank you for pointing that out.
Hey, fucktard. Nice to see how YOU managed to make it up the evolutionary ladder. Considering your highly obscued view of things you know shit about in the first place, it’s really rather astounding. I just LOVE seeing ignorant fuckheads, like yourself, mouthing off like this. There are plenty of people out there who have no interest in sex and would be more content on a romantic-loving relationship than a phydical one. They are honestly more admirable than the fuckhounds of the world. Life is NOT about sex, nor does it revolve around it. That’s probably a shock for you to hear, but get the fuck over it.
[heartiste: is anyone else noticing a trend here? the asexual loser mafia keeps tipping their neurotic hat with cluewords like “fuckhound” and “breeder” and “thinking with your crotch”. one could be forgiven for assuming these solipsistic weirdos have some sort of hang-up about sex and about people who like to have sex. you see, for the typical self-proclaimed asexual, it’s not really about being born that way and wishing for understanding and acceptance. it’s about acting out deep-seated psychological discord through tolerance-themed intolerant temper tantrums and demonization of those who belittle them on account of waving their mental health and normalcy in their faces every day just by being alive.]
I’ve noticed you seem to be angry. Would you like to talk about it?
Heartiste nails it again…
The amount of hamstering and raw-nervism evinced on this thread is a surprise to me.
I mean, I knew the internet was an amplifier of the human condition… I just hadn’t realized we were that far down the road to oblivion.
“There are plenty of people out there who have no interest in sex and would be more content on a romantic-loving relationship than a phydical one. They are honestly more admirable than the fuckhounds of the world.”
Fuckhound…I love it! I’ve got a new way to describe myself.
Yeah… I haven’t been called that since my honeymoon.
(wipes a tear of nostalgia from his otherwise manly visage)
OK look CH, you’ve simply outdone yourself on this post. Brilliant and funny as hell.
And one look into that girl’s eyes and you know something is….off.
My love of this site (and others like it) has no bounds!
Actually, for your typical 22 YO omega with aspie traits, having a girl friend without sex would be a big step up from their actual existence. It would be a great opportunity to learn social skills and learn to be comfortable around a woman. You guys take all that stuff for granted, so you don’t see this.
Wow, is this for real? You think you know everything, don’t you? Why don’t you get your sorry, hateful ass off of the computer forever and just leave us alone. We’re not hurting anyone, and we’re not trying to convince people to be asexy with us.
[heartiste: “asexy”. LOL. btw, what is this comment but an attempt to convince people of your point of view?]
Most of us have no problem with sexual people and why would you even write this?
[to get at the cream-filled center of a really juicy target.]
I usually don’t hate on the internet, but: GO CHOKE ON A DICK AND THEN DIE IN A HOLE YOU MISERABLE HATEFUL BASTARD.
[i thought you said you have no problem with sexual people?]
LOL, this is funny, Heartiste. As I said before, you should be writing romantic stories.
Love you too, cupcake.
“asexy”?!!!
Gotta hand it to the left end of the spectrum… for not wanting labels, they sure do know how to pick the cutest ones to describe themselves.
Beta of the month? More like beta of the year. There’s no fucking WAY it can get any lower than this……….
[heartiste: stay tuned. i have just received another candidate for BOTM that quite possibly plumbs greater depths of indignity and self-flagellation than timothy tinyballs.]
I think I just threw up a little.
[heartiste: did you see a penis-shaped fruit?]
You, and everyone agreeing with you, are the scum of the Earth.
[keep in mind that the sexual scum will inherit the earth. the asexual outcasts will… i dunno, what is it you freaks do with your genitals? squeeze your eyes shut when you have to take a shower?]
Do your research, you sad, pathetic excuse of a human.
[good, gooood, your hate is welling up within you.]
It is a legitimate orientation.
[what’s your opinion on goat fucking?]
So, she does’t want sex, and her boyfriend is happy with that. What is wrong with that?
[why are you so afraid of people like them being called wrong?]
The ignorance of you, and the people commenting, and everyone else who agrees with you is the reason this world is going to hell.
[it’ll go to hell a lot faster if everyone stopped having sex.]
I don’t even know if it’s considered just ignorance, actually.
[i’m sure there’s a serious sounding feminist-approved pseudoscientific stitched-together word that will amply describe your legitimate outrage.]
I bet that you all probably are misogynistic,
[what’s with the misogynist cries? the guy took more shit than the girl in this post. if anything, you’d be more on the mark accusing me of misandry.
ah, yes, i know what explains your oversight. you neomaxizimdweeby asexual poseurs are really psychologically damaged feminists who loathe male desire and the reality of innate human biological differences.]
ignorant little men that are overcompensating for their small-shall we say “stature”?
[i’m dense. what do you mean by “stature”? i really want to understand your humor, because i hate missing out on something funny.]
-and are mad because you probably get turned down a lot by woman.
[damn, by that line of reasoning, genghis khan was one mad motherfucker who got turned down by a lot of women.]
This is probably because you are such a pathetic creep,
[it’s kinda creepy to be afraid of your own vagina.]
but the last one’s excuse was probably that she was asexual, and you just had to get on the hate train.
[there’s nothing like a bit of the ol’ ultrahate to keep the spirits high!]
Anyways, do your research, and stop being a disgusting human being.
[when you go to the gynecologist, does he have to pry you open with a front loader?]
You repel me.
[i bet you say that to all the boys.]
[when you go to the gynecologist, does he have to pry you open with a front loader?]
Instant classic. I’m stealing this from you Heartiste.
STEP ASIDE, INTERNET BADASSES COMING THROUGH
hahaha how the fuck do you people even breathe?
Note the left-wing logic: anyone who makes fun of these freaks is a closeted fag.
That’s some cracker-jack use of your Performing Arts degree there, Chester.
Exactly… you can tell the degree of their mental unsoundness by the fact that they use their own proclivities as epithets to shame others.
Well, my brain fires off impulses to my diaphragm, which contacts or expands to cause my lungs to take in the atmosphere, from whence essential chemicals are extracted and waste material is expelled.
How do you breathe? Osmosis? Skittle-powered unicorns?
“This is true of Jenni who is heteroromantic, and although having no interest in sex, is still attracted to people, and is in a relationship with 22-year-old Tim.”
Heteroromantic? I hate that kind of made-up terminology that justifies deviancy.
OTOH, heartiste’s terminology is gold because it’s true to life:
* übercockteases
* Generation Puffboy
* cockooning
Wow. You must all have the tiniest cocks. I mean, really. Are you that insecure about your own masculinity? So, someone you have never met and probably never will doesn’t want to have sex. How shocking. What a bunch of pathetic wankers XD
Better a tiny cock than none at all… or in your case, a reamed out bung hole through which a fist may pass.
Alternate, more accurate title for this post: HOW DARE PEOPLE NOT FIT INTO MY NARROW-MINDED VIEWS OF MASCULINITY AND SEXUALITY!!!! RAAAAAGH CHICKS WHO WON’T FUCK ME MAKE ME SO AAAANGRY! I AM A MANLY INTERNET TOUGH GUY WHO WASTES HIS LIFE BLOGGING ABOUT PEOPLE WHO HAVE BETTER THINGS TO DO THAN BE A SUPER MANLY INTERNET TOUGH GUY AND DID I MENTION THAT I AM A TOTALLY HETEROSEXUAL MANLY TOUGH GUY WHO IS A MAN?
Oh, man, you’re SO EDGY, buying into the status quo like this. I can barely handle your badassitude.
U mad there, sugarplum?
I used to have hope for humanity. Then I read this blatantly offensive, crude and frankly slanderous article, and the ignorant, Hitler-esque (defining ‘perfection’ in certain aspects of the human form as compared to ‘imperfection’ in others, calling asexuals ‘freaks’, not willing to do true research before speaking, incredibly sexist language, complete unrepentant acephobia… I could go on) comments about it.
Add to that the perpetuation of the divide between ‘alphas’ and ‘betas’ (a ‘Brave New World’ situation apparently isn’t too far away) and the thought that ‘betas’ deserve scorn for – as you would define it – being emotional, understanding, and sensitive…
You people disgust me. I thought you should know that.
We aim to please.
Thank you for bringing that to our attention…. for we are all wise men here, and love a reproof.
“complete unrepentant acephobia”
No, Ace is cool. It’s Gary that scares me. I don’t trust him one bit.
Ah! With these last negative responses, it’s looking like debate time!
(More likely, flamewar time, but it will be interesting nonetheless).
Keep at it, guys!
Here’s a youtube video with her talking about pedestalization:
Bloviating on youtube? Who’da thunk it?
Is there (hard – not social) scientific data on asexuality? Maybe these people have low hormone production. I doubt it but just wondering.
What the actual fuck?
Whoever wrote this is an insuffrable dickwad. Cut off his penis. He deserves it.
[heartiste: so physical mutilation is how you answer a disagreement in opinion. nice to know.
since that’s the standard, i hope your clit and labia get cut off. you deserve it.]
The enemy yet again shows his/her true colors… say something he/she doesn’t like, and all veneers of civility are stripped. Sort of like watching the broads of The View (both panel and audience) laugh about the guy whose penis got cut off.
Here’s a bunch of Youtube videos of her:
I seriously can’t believe you are serious. The fuck is wrong with your brain that you can seriously publish something like this in the public domain? You may consider yourself alpha or whatever, but this article would suggest otherwise. You are a little bitch who thinks he is an internet hard man. I really feel sorry for you and your way of thinking.
LOL – laughed so hard – good writing!
Reading through some of these posets, I find myself wondering if “rape culture” is the new way to sound informed, educated, etc. among the feminist campus cults? In my day on campuses, they used terms like “patriarchy”, “male privilege”, and the like and attended “take back the night” rallies. The whole campus feminist thing was upper-middle class female hysteria, and best simply avoided, as they were no threat to anyone, except the occasional idiot castrato who “dated” one before getting accused of date rape. Those women lived impossibley privileged, safe, comforable lives, yet they saw some sort of holocaust engulfing them. Hysteria.
I don’t much care what the new lingo is, except to the extent that I hear it hereafter, I will know to let my face go slack, and change the topic to something the feminist zealot true believers have no opinion on,like Zimbabwe inflation rates. That way the conversation is over quicker, and I don’t have hear their braying rhetoric about most topics.
If Timmy Boy ever winds up in eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, or Latin America, he will find a reason to drop Rainbow Dull immediately.
I personally hope that this kid soon realizes he is being shafted.
Also, I bet that his beloved Jenni is getting some on the side anyway.
Damn straight.
Offtop.
Half population of Poland (almost) was involved in child searching (alleged kidnapping) because of woman confabulations.
http://www.thenews.pl/1/9/Artykul/85354,Police-search-for-babys-body-after-mothers-confession
Really fascinating article on response rates in online dating and what the message says.
Check out the part where he talks about compliments….and what the best opening phrase is.
Turns out if you compliment the looks of a girl in anyway your response rate plummets..
And turns out the best opener is an indirect bullshit opener that conveys little to no interest. The top opening phrase was “How’s it going?”….the worst..>”Hello” and “hi”
pretty much validates everything that’s talked about on this site with respect to opening.
indirect + conveying a lack of interest = gina tingle = response
Exactly how it works in real life.
http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/online-dating-advice-exactly-what-to-say-in-a-first-message/
the sanctimonious comments by liberals/feminists who can’t seem to grapple with the thought that there are people in existence who don’t subscribe to their secular religion and consequently hold non-pc views are amusing!
It’s always just a string of shaming tactics with them, anything to avoid having to actually construct a meaningful counter-argument of course.
I don’t understand this. What are you trying to gain by writing this article? In all seriousness, what would you get from being a total douche on the internet besides attention? If that’s all you want, then, congrats. You did it!
I also really love your snappy comments back at people who say this article is disgusting. How awful it is that they disagree with you! You don’t need to take that shit from them, you have a blog hosted on wordpress! You’ve really come farther than any of us ever could.
Also, not all women care about sex. It doesn’t mean that they just can’t get any. But, since sex is mostly characterized as being done by a man and a woman, people would assume that if men love it so much then so do women! What a bitch she is for not wanting sex! What bitches woman are for not wanting sex every minute of everyday! What heroes men are for forcing themselves upon woman too! Then when a man is respectful of a woman, oh shit he is WEAK. And to be honest, you’re basically saying that men should just take what they want from woman and we, as woman, should let them. It’s only fair, considering SEX IS A BASIC HUMAN NEED, according to you.
If you want to respond with those oh so hilarious comments, then remember, if you really want people to understand your point and possibly agree with you, then be mature about it. Saying her worst nightmares involve 3D penises falling around her is something I would expect a 10 year old boy to say.
I do agree that it’s stupid to say nothing is wrong with anything, after all, there is something very wrong with you.
So you’re not misogynist, you’re misandrist because you’re bashing the guy for being a lowly “beta”/”omega”?
Riiight.
[heariste: right. listen, doofus, by your own standard definition of misogyny as verbal abuse, i stand just as guilty of misandry. now maybe you don’t like this logical connection because you’re a brainwashed feminist cunttoy, but that doesn’t change the fact that you and your ilk studiously avoid showing expressions of sympathy for the man in this post who comes under my attack that you are more than happy to lavish on the woman. for the slower among you, this is called a double standard.]
To me it sounds like an “alpha man” is supposed to be better than a woman. Treating women as your equals would be a sign of weakness, wouldn’t it?
[chicks dig dominant men.]
And a woman who doesn’t want your precious alpha cock must be sick.
[a heterosexual woman who doesn’t want any cock is sick.]
Yeah, totally.
[totally, dude.]
Narcississm at its best.
[*preen*]
You know, just because your brain seems to be located in the crotch area doesn’t mean it’s the same for everyone.
[yet another asexualist blurt revealing its true motivation and psychology behind the tolerance mask. face it, you just hate normal people.]
(Thankfully there are enough sexual people who do also have a brain, but that might be hard to imagine for you as well.)
[does each use of the genitals subtract 1 IQ point? discuss.]
I am an asexual myself,
[you don’t say!]
and I dare say I am neither fat nor ugly nor lacking in opportunities.
[you daren’t!]
I simply have no interest. I don’t get it.
[hey, maybe you’re one of those outliers with a fucked up brain structure you inherited from birth. jsut remember… you are not normal. get used to it.]
I’m not claiming it’s normal, but it’s not something bad.
[define bad.]
Neither is it better. It just is, and if I have no problem with it, I don’t see why you should.
[i don’t “have a problem” with it. it’s no skin off my nose if a few nuts want to cuddle until death do them part. i just like mocking those who claim to be asexuals. i like mocking their lifestyles, their freakazoid intimacy arrangements, their pretenses to normalcy, their
demands for acceptance, and their hidden psychologically demented underpinnings. it is the predatory relationship of the strong on the weak. a state of glorious nature. a riptide into the depths of the id.
it is good.]
Rape, by the way, doesn’t usually help people accept the bliss of sexual intercourse.
[rape. always with the rape with you feminists. is the word rape supposed to be an argument ender? a logical loophole that discredits any opposing thought regardless of fact? here’s a thought: the overwhelming majority of sexual acts involve no rape at all.]
Instead it usually screws up their life and often enough prevents them from enjoying sex ever again due to traumatic memories.
[if a past rape has caused a woman to turn asexual, then that proves my point that many asexuals are simply mentally damaged people who need help to get over their fear of the penis. it does them no good for people like you to reinforce their beliefs that asexuality is a harmless lifestyle choice or an innate characteristic just as legitimate as normal sexuality.]
The magnitude of ignorance in this article and the comments below is really off the scale. Impressive.
[i’m guessing this is the first time in your stunted, bubblegirl life you have been presented with a viewpoint that challenges your equalist, we-are-the-world twaddle.
and shocked! shocked you are!]
This can’t be the conservative “Ace of Spades”, is it?
No way. I’d be shocked that this level of stupidity would come from him.
Hey Heartise, looks like you’ve really frazzled the half-men and femi-cunts with your posting.
Are you being linked to from a hate site like Jizzabel? Or are all the mentally-retarded, sexually stunted, brainless, Obama-worshiping hipsters just drawn here on a random Friday?
[heartiste: the most broken of humanity are the easiest to troll.]
I don’t really care if you disagree with being asexual or not, but just try to be a little more mature about it.
[heartiste: nah. maturity doesn’t help the message get under the skin.]
Making fun (that is what you’re doing) of women
[and men]
who feel no sexual attraction or who don’t always desire sex is very juvenile.
[but fun. it’s the adult version of pulling wings off insects.]
As is making fun of anyone, really!
[all work and no play makes jack a dull boy.]
It’s just not fair to make assumptions that all asexual woman are afraid of penises.
[you’re right. a better assumption: they hate penises.]
They may be afraid of sex, and what comes with it, but not that they are afraid of a cock and that’s it.
[maybe they hate sex because they’re surrounded by lickspittle beta males all day? who could blame a woman for projecting her disgust for betas onto the act of sex itself when she has no alternate experience from which to draw.]
If one woman declares herself asexual because she’s never felt sexual attraction or the desire to have sex all that much, that’s her choice.
[making fun of someone for their choices is not the same as denying them their choices. is this concept hard to grasp?]
If someone else legitimately is afraid of having sex or being in a relationship, then that is once again her choice to not have sex. And after reading this article, it’s doubtful they would ever come to terms with themselves, especially since you make them feel so wrong for choosing this lifestyle.
[asexuals: the weaker sex.]
Oy vey, the amount of hate spewed by those who call heartiste a hater!
*nods*
it’s interesting, from an academic standpoint, even.
their anger is… it’s so seething, you can feel it blurring your computer screen. it’s amazing. to get so upset by a guy lightly ridiculing this couple and DARING to say a man of quality should expect sex from a girl he’s with.
this is why so many male sycophants probably fall by the wayside… even if they try to empathize with feminist types, the feminist attack on males having any desires or needs is so palpable that eventually the sympathizing douche will get disgusted with being attacked for being human
All of the negative comments that our gracious host has so thoroughly demolished intellectually have the same user icon. Not sure what that means at wordpress, but for most sites it means the same IP address. All the work of one troll with much time to spend methinks.
Funny thing: You have the same icon.
what, i’m not allowed to be asexual?
oh alright
because something is obviously wrong with me.
Yes. Glad you are self-aware. Now back to the hugbox with you.
The best way to ask for anal sex?
“Oops!”
I’d say that applies here.
Regarding that Taiwan and abortion link:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/687/sexratiosinwhitecountri.png/
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/853/sexratiosbyraceus.png/
Wow….there’s a lot of crazy people defending this girl…but none of them is thinking about the guy.
She’s a nutter. And I’m like a fucking nun and I say this.
Even if she is missing a ‘brain chip’ it’s not nice to do that to a man. If you love someone you want him to have children and to experience life to the fullest and she’s robbing him of that.
What a selfish disgusting Rainbow Haired turd.
Good times.
It’s simple: if you don’t want ridicule, stay out of the BBC. Instead, we have an attention whore and her chump.
The Asexual Mafia is swarming the comments section like angry stingless bees. We need a catchy name for them. Firebrands of Frigidity? Barren Battleaxes? The Neutered Network? The Desiccated Coven? Help me out here!
[heartiste: the eunuchracy.]
Bitches of Barreness?
Cunts of Cuddling?
No Dick for Me, No Dick For You?
Womyn Studies Graduates of America?
Asexy Sadies?
@ bo:
“There are plenty of people out there who have no interest in sex and would be more content on a romantic-loving relationship than a phydical one.”
Are you suggesting that a phydical [sic] relationship precludes romance and love? Cannot a phydical [sic] relationship coexist alongside romance and love? And what’s to be said about Olivia Newton-John’s early 80′s pop hit, “Let’s Get Phydical [sic]“?
Thank you so much for hating me.
If people like you liked me, I’d be doing something wrong.
I guess I’m good
(The feeling might be mutual)
Was my comment caught up in moderation? *is a long-time fan of this blog/not a troll*
Honestly. A person’s sexuality is their choice and their choice alone. You have NO RIGHT WHATSOEVER to judge them for it. Accept it and move on. Or don’t accept it and deal with it YOURSELF. There is no need to spread hatred. Frankly it doesn’t shine a bright light on you.
Here’s what I don’t get. Why do you keep saying No One has ANY RIGHT to judge? We can judge all we want. What do you propose; to make it a thought-crime and hate-speech to say something that disagrees with your touchy feely dogmas?
No one here is saying lets raid her home and hold her down while forcing her lame limp-dick male cuddlebuddy to bang her at gun point. We are criticizing her. Is that so wrong, Sarah. There’s no reason for you to be so hateful and venomous over people sharing an opinion.
Honestly. A person’s sexuality is their choice and their choice alone. You have EVERY RIGHT to judge them for it. Accept this and move on. Or don’t accept it and deal with it YOURSELF. There is no need to complain. Frankly it doesn’t shine a bright light on you.
There, I fixed it.
Sure we can judge. People judge people all the time. You are judging the commenters and author right now. Who made YOU the Supreme Court of Internet of Opinion just because you bleed every month?
Don’t plant your ass on the BBC if you don’t want people to talk.
@ Anonymous, on February 3, 2012 at 11:40 am:
“Anyways, do your research, and stop being a disgusting human being.”
But I DID do my research; I looked diligently into the meaning and significance of ‘acephobia’. And I learned that it’s just as totally gay as I’d figured it to be.
Asexuals? Why is this shocking? All women are asexuals, it just takes marriage and/or children for the disease to manifest itself.
Seriously, here’s why this is bullshit – lets presume for a moment our little pixie is asexual and has no desire to engage in sexual behavior – what’s stopping her from sexually satisfying her Beta BF?
If she’s truly sexually indifferent, one would think that engaging in sex would have no more significance than doing the dishes for her. You may not enjoy or have a desire for washing dishes, but you do them because you like clean dishes.
If she is self-aware enough about her abnormal condition to volunteer to be the subject of a BBC article about it, does it not stand to reason that, even though she doesn’t desire sex, she would still engage in sexual activities to satisfy the natural sex drive of a man who is willing to accomodate her ‘condition’?
You cannot use the argument that it’s wrong to force a woman to have sex with a man against her will in this case because, as per her assertion, she is entirely indifferent to sexual desire. Wives or GFs begrudgingly, but dutifully having sex with their partners are off-put because sex in that context is perceived as an obligation, not for a lack of normative sexual desire. In a case of true sexual desire neutrality, a sex act would have no more bearing than her brushing her teeth or driving a car. Sex would be a mundane act.
This isn’t the case here; Pixie girl is sex-averse. She is not sex-neutral, she is sex-negative. If she masturbates or has any sexual motivation to bring herself to orgasm she is not asexual. If she fucked the Beta boy without having any impulse to get off, she’s asexual.
[heartiste: excellent deconstruction rollo. lends credence to the theory that female asexuality is really anti-male sexuality. which is why the “asexual” losers came out of the woodwork for this post. the truth hit too close to the bone(r).]
Fuck Buddy (also see, ‘Booty Call’): A situation wherein a woman provides convenient sexual availability with no expectation of a reciprocal emotional investment in a relationship. Ideally 100% sexual availability, 0% commitment.
Emotional Tampon: A situation wherein a man provides unlimited emotional support, provisioning and comfort with no expectation of reciprocal sexual response in a relationship. Ideally 0% sexual availability, 100% commitment.
Pixie girl is the feminine social equivalent of the worst douchebag Player you can conjure in your mind.
Exactly. But such is the “patriarchy” (lol) we live in, that pixie girl is somehow portrayed as the adorable, innocent victim, and her direct equivalent is rendered a devil who must be burned at the stake.
Hey, yea, so I’m glad people can become neuro-scientists from the BBC. I never knew they could generate a new wave of medical professors.
But fuck it, as a sex positive asexual male I’ve enjoyed sleeping with women sexually. Its all good for a fun time, sure. Asexuality has nothing to do with one’s interest in sex, just the fact that you don’t really get a hard on looking at either men or women.
So let’s start with where you and the rest of the media are fucking retards: Asexuals can enjoy having sex.
Now, if you can get your head out of your ass and follow close, I’ll try and use small words:
I like sex, but I’m not particularly attracted to either gender. Hence, I am an asexual. I don’t go nuts over a hot woman, and I really doubt an asexual woman would go nuts over a hot, dominant guy. So honestly, your concept that one would is deluded and strange.
I understand you have this need to point out so called “beta” males with your backwards psychoanalysis, but I think you’re reading from the same text book that says people will bully others to cover up the same flaws that they have. ie: You make fun of “betas” because you are one. Unless, of course, outdated psychology is outdated. You obviously don’t think so. Congratulations, you’re a winner.
“Asexuality” by etymology means a lack of sexual interest. If you are having any sort of sexual activity, you aren’t asexual. Full stop.
Greek, motherfuckers, do you grok it?
This is a reply to you and the other person talking about definitions. Etymology man to the rescue:
Heterosexual-Sexually attracted to others.
___sexual- Sexually attracted to ___
Homosexual- Sexually attracted to the same (gender).
Bisexual- Sexually attracted to both (genders)
Pansexual- Sexually attracted to all (genders)
Asexual- Sexually attracted to none (gender).
Note the lack of libido in any of the above definitions. Unless we change asexual to mean “No interest in sex” but that would be etymologically incorrect, as the pattern doesn’t fit. Have a nice day.
[heartiste: if you’re truly sexually attracted to none, then you are not getting a boner. the boner doesn’t lie. most likely, you are just garden variety bisexual.]
Now you’re shifting the definition to fit your agenda. Nice tactic, but you’re insulting my intelligence (and pushing beyond the bounds of your own) with that ploy.
Go back to throwing insults, it’s more your style.
C’mon sis, tell us some good ones.
Hey dumb ass why do people who have sex,but obviously have a shitty libido fuck up and misuse the word asexual… which if you understood linguistics…
I’m grappling with your lack of communication skills, but I’ll give it a go:
I don’t have a shitty libido, its quite normal to above average actually. Thank you for your concern. But no, I’m still not sexually attracted to either gender just because i get boners. Partners just happen to be more fun compared to jerking off.
[heartiste: so let me get this straight. you get a boner, you insert that boner into men and women and get off, and yet you experience no sexual attraction. mmhmm.
maybe you just can’t get past the idea that being part of a species with higher intelligence means things and acts will get labeled. it’s labeling! run for the hills!!]
Sex=/=sexual attraction.
[heartiste: i’m not sexually attracted to obese women or men. i could never sport a boner looking at the naked bodies of obese women or men. if i could sport a boner looking at those types of people, it stands to reason that some sexual attraction component is at work there.
is any of this getting through to you?]
For example, I do boxing. I will spar with partners and boxing is fun. This does not mean, however, that I was boxually attracted to my sparring partner and that I was like “huh, yea, I’d wanna box you” before hand, but rather I wanted to box and he was available.
[this analogy is so stupid it defies the courtesy of a measured consideration, but here goes. if you are boxing with someone, and you do this a lot, and seek it out, it means you probably like boxing. you are “attracted” to the sport of boxing. if you are boffing men and women, and you do this a lot, and you seek it out, it means you are attracted to those men and women you boff. if you weren’t, you wouldn’t boff them.
no amount of sophistic lawyerly bullshit will spare you that labeling.]
“Court Allows Man to Seek Money from ‘Daughter’s’ Biological Dad,” Christina Ng, ABC News via Yahoo! News, 3 February 2012
http://news.yahoo.com/court-allows-man-seek-money-daughters-biological-dad-184320957–abc-news.html
bigots ahoy!
You are an abomination.
Your hatefilled rant only serves to make asexual people feel bad about themselves. Wow. I’m sure you’re really proud of yourself for that. Because that’s what you should aim for in life, isn’t it? making other people miserable?
Oh wait. No it isn’t.
You fill me with rage. Righteous rage, I like to think, because to me your argument (in fact every word leaving your mouth, metaphorically speaking) is ridiculous. But you actually think you’re right, don’t you? you really believe this bullshit you’re saying?
I don’t understand you, really, I don’t.
Personally, I think you’re an idiot. Not worthy of expressing your opinion, if you choose this way to do it. And since you choose to be spiteful, I feel justified in being spiteful myself.
People like you are the reason that I, as an asexual, feel uncomfortable admitting to it. There is nothing wrong with me. Argue all you like, but there is nothing wrong with me. There is, however, a whole lot wrong with an asshole like you who feels the need to hate on the way I feel about people. Not even you. I don’t concern you. But I’m asexual, so your rant about asexuality includes me. Sweetheart, let me tell you this, even if I was interested in sex, your personality would still be a massive turn-off. I don’t care what you look like, you could be the most stunning-looking human being in all creation, but with a mind like that, you’re just as appealing as the most unattractive human. Wow. I’m getting personal now.
Does that please you or infuriate you? please, because you dragged me down to your level of petty name-calling, or infuriate, because it’s not nice to have a complete stranger come up to you and tell you unpleasant things.
I don’t know man, I just really hate your guts. But I will move on with my life, slightly more wary of the human species in general, because there are assholes like you among us, but generally positive, because we’re not all like you.
Thank god for that
[heartiste: losers on a stage, full of self-contradictions and unintentional irony, signifying nothing.]
Why all the spitfire from the whacked-out equaltarians? I love the way reality grinds the delicate sensibilities of the stalwart ball-barons of liberalism.
Do these fucktards not understand if asexuality was adopted, writ large, we would face extinction? The answer alone should provide cynosural proof, whereby rational thought leads to the obvious conclusion that that bizarre orientation is: ABNORMAL and wholly inharmonious with human nature.
Liberalism’s eternal enemy: Mother Nature.
I actually knew a hot girl that claimed to be asexual. She had the same weird alternative style as the rainbow hair girl seems to have; the girl was into mortuary science, dark anime, and talked about stoic logic of all things.
Why are the sexually weird ones the socially weird ones?
LOL I can’t believe what I just wandered into, are you people for real … all these comments talking about relationships as if love and affection meant nothing, what is even GOING ON here. Ever heard of married couples who are still head over heals after 60 years? Long distance relationships? People having accidents that cause them to be physically unable to have sex – do you think that makes their partners automatically fall out of love with them or what? You cannot control love. It doesn’t magically go away if you’re told that you can’t have sex with the person. If you haven’t figured that out yet … I guess none of you have ever been in love?? Fuck, I’ve found the hiding place of a bunch of unlucky bastards. Never mind then. You’ll get it once you’ve experienced it, trust me.
I love the fact that this post attracted a new type of mafia. Some of them will inexplicably be attracted to the archives, and I already hear the screams of cognitive dissonances.
But I bet the echo will be much more enjoyable in the vast corridors of the chateau. And I envy the proprietors for this upcoming sadistic blast.
[heartiste: a masterful troll on my part, i must say!]
If a woman won’t sleep with a man its because she doesn’t trust either him or herself. People of all ages are at all different stages of sexual development. Unless there is a biological/chemical issue, all the hard-wiring is there, the program just hasn’t been run. Denying the importance of sex only means a person is unawakened to it. That’s okay. As Plato described, a person must adjust to the light of truth in increments. In this case, the light is red