• About
  • Alpha Assessment Submissions
  • Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
  • Dating Market Value Test For Men
  • Dating Market Value Test For Women
  • Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
  • Shit Cuckservatives Say
  • The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon

Chateau Heartiste

Where pretty lies perish.

Feed on
Posts
Comments

An Eye Contact Crib Sheet

Oct 6th, 2015 by CH

Eye contact from women is usually the first cue that men who aren’t cut out for cold approaches rely on when deciding whether to initiate a courtship salvo. The disadvantage of waiting for eye contact before making a move is, naturally, the waiting. You’ll never cross the finish line if the starter gun doesn’t go off. The advantage of relying on eye contact authorization from women is the efficiency of only chatting up girls who have ocularly indicated a willingness to be chatted up by you. Plus, eye contact is one of those proto-sexytime signals that can be deduced from a distance, and in various locales. You can catch a woman’s eye on the sidewalk as easily as at a bar or a boardroom.

If eye contact is a must before you’ll consider talking to a random girl, then this post will help you identify your choicest targets. Did you know that people have autonomic eye movements which operate at the subconscious level, and which differ according to contextual inputs?

The rules of eye contact are simple. After catching her eye:

  • If she looks down: She’s instantly attracted but shy.

Approach this girl, but go easy on the cocky jerkboy game. She’s a natural introvert, and a romantic at heart. Don’t come on too strong. A light touch will do, flirty and coy. She’ll just be happy you even had the balls to escort her from her dreamy inner sanctum.

  • If she looks to the side: She’s not instantly attracted.

You will have your work cut out for you on this girl. A side-looker is as good as (or bad as, depending on your perspective) a cold approach on a girl who hasn’t noticed you. The side-looker has a boyfriend, or she doesn’t like your look or your leer, or she’s a manjawed feminist who is constitutionally incapable of flirting with men without having an existential moral crisis. You can turn a girl like this around, but it will mean you have to be exceptionally bold and full of teasing and negs. An effective opener would be one that immediately disqualifies her, flips the script, and assumes the sale. For example, “I caught you checking me out. Don’t worry, even though it’s nothing new, I’m still flattered.”

  • If she holds eye contact intensely: She’s instantly attracted and slutty.

Weaker men wilt under the pressure of the hard-eye contact girl. She’s dripping sex from her limpid orbs, and only men made of sterner stuff will rise to her fightin’ iris challenge. Nothing much needed here but an open-faced “Hi” and a pretext to absolve her nascent feelings of aggressive sluttitude (such as asking her for directions if you cross her path on a street corner). A direct, “Hey, I noticed you from across the room, and had to come over and see what your deal is”, will work in any bar setting. Ovulating women are often intense eye contact machines, and will lock on any man who has the right “look” for her fired-up womb. (This look encompasses not just physical traits, but body language and fashion sense.)

Strangely, I have yet to make eye contact with a girl who reacted by looking upward. If I do, I’ll assume she’s a nun. Or already on her knees in front of me.

***

As readers have probably noticed, this post was mistakenly titled “An eye contact crib shit”. It has since been corrected. 😆 I keel myself!

Posted in Biomechanics is God, Game, Girls, Rules of Manhood | 111 Comments »

What We Have Lost

Oct 6th, 2015 by CH

Reader Moses links to an extraordinary website of just-released photos from 1935-1945 America, and comments:

OT – Over 100k photos of American everyday life between 1935-1945 were just released online.

http://photogrammar.yale.edu/map/

Incredible.

Observe the style, the formality, civic rituals and shared civic culture. That is the culture that built America.

It’s gone.

Street scene at 38th Street and 7th Avenue, New York City, Nov 1936.

Detroit, Michigan. Style show of clothes worn by better-dressed office workers, presented by the Chrysler Girls’ Club of the Chrysler Corporation at Saks Fifth Avenue store. Chrysler girls drinking non-alcoholic punch. 1942.

Tip Estes, Indiana hired hand, with four of his nine children. Near Fowler, Benton, Indiana. March, 1937.

Men waiting in line outside the city mission–the first twenty-five will be fed. Dubuque, Iowa, April, 1940. [ed: that’s shame and gratitude on their faces, a look we haven’t seen on America’s underprivileged in a long while.]

Housewives in Tygart Valley, West Virginia, have weekly group meetings in home economics. Here they are quilting. September, 1938. [ed: not a fatty (or single mom) in the bunch. today, west virginia has the highest obesity rate in the nation.]

Student with recreational director during basketball game. Prairie Farms, Montgomery, Alabama. 1939.

Something more tragic than nostalgia for a time in America you weren’t even alive forms a knot in the pit of your stomach.

I wonder, if late-stage decadent Romans had had access to photographs from Rome’s glorious past, would they have seen the light and done all they could to turn back before it was too late?

Reminder: What we have gained:

Anyplace, America, 2015.

Posted in Goodbye America | 244 Comments »

The Wickedest Links

Oct 5th, 2015 by CH

1. As usual dissident alt-right websites are the ones doing the job legacy journalists won’t do. Is there a HALF-WHITEWASHING campaign being conducted by Hivemind operatives to erase from the public sphere any evidence of Chris Harper-Mercer’s anti-cop, anti-White, pro-black radicalism ideology?

According to initial police reports, Mercer left a manifesto behind at the scene. Where is that manifesto? Was it burned by Narrative “cleaners”? The public deserves to know what motivated Mercer’s murderous rampage, so that there’s a chance to thwart potential future attackers before they snap.

2. Another heavenly trumpet blast heralds The Trumpening. Trump says Eisenhower’s 1950s illegal alien deportation plan dubbed “Operation Wetback” is a model for his own immigration plan.

It’s very effective of Trump to remind Americans that what’s he’s suggesting we do about illegal invaders isn’t (too) racist, beyond the pale or practically impossible, as so many shrieking shitlibs want you to believe. It was done before without the gates of hell opening, and that means it can be done again.

This is another good moment to remind the studio audience how much more COMPETENT 1950s America was compared to 2015 America.

3. Related: Trump is back up to 34% in the latest IPSOS poll. ¡Jabe! is down to 4% in the new Pew poll.

Gonna have to agree with the Trumpendoge here. Chihuahuas are shit dogs. Ugly, nasty little yappers. Diminutive, thin-skinned, and useless, just like our New Diversity America.

4. Here’s shocking news (not): South Africa’s murder rate is up in the past few years, reversing a slow decline in the murder rate over the previous years. Nearly 49 people are murdered every day in South Africa, and it’s safe to say White Afrikaaners are not the ones doing the murdering.

Someone else can check the numbers, but I believe lovely Honduras remains the number one murder nation of the world. Clearly the solution for these wretchedly homicidal countries is to circulate propaganda photos of a dead kid to ethnomasochistic shitlib SWPL Americans so that they will open the US border to millions of murderous Hondurans and Bantus. That’ll level the worldwide murder rate (lower the sending countries’ crime rate and raise the US’s crime rate) and make gated community bubble-headed status whoring spergitarians like Bryan Caplan and Alex Tabbarok happy.

I have a better solution: Separate countries.

5. BigGalYoga. Namasticate.

6. More research points some of the blame for the rising diabetes and obesity epidemics at endocrine-disrupting chemical (EDCs).

Known EDCs include bisphenol A (BPA) found in food can linings and cash register receipts, phthalates found in plastics and cosmetics, flame retardants and pesticides. The chemicals are so common that nearly every person on Earth has been exposed to one or more.

Westerners have had decades now receiving the harsh blowback of the industrial/better-living-through-chemistry revolution. Blowback from the iPhag/information revolution is starting to sting. And, as CH has predicted, the eventual and inevitable robot/sexbot revolution will usher a blowback so powerful it will shatter the foundations of the economic and sexual markets. Prepare for an era of accelerated gene-culture-environment co-evolution the likes of which humanity hasn’t seen since, oh, the Toba Event or the Black Death.

7. This is a great thread about smoking, and its unusually rapid demise as a social bonding ritual in the US. Although I’m not conspiratorially minded, I like Bixxy Noodles comment:

It was never about smoking per se. Think of it as more like a proof-of-concept roll-out for a social control system, which has now gone from beta to alpha to gold release.

Smoking was an easy target because its social pattern was recent and not deeply ingrained. But it WAS ubiquitous and associated with a highly addictive substance.

I like to point out to fat acceptance losers that the insanely effective anti-smoking campaign in America is proof that aggressive, sustained, and widespread social shaming can indeed work to change human behavior on a large scale. The success of anti-smoking PSAs, regulations, adn social stigmatism is a mild rebuke to strict hereditarians who hold that nothing changes in a culture without the human genetic substructure changing first. This isn’t an argument in favor of blank slatism by any means, but it is a reminder that humans also have genes which make them susceptible to feeling bad when ostracized by their tribe. What worked for smoking may not work as effectively for fatty fattitude, but it’s worth a try. And by “a try” I mean a real try, not a half-assed try that spares fat fucks’ feelings.

Anyhow, Bixxy is onto something. It’s easy to envision the ruling class learning all the wrong lessons from the success of their anti-smoking propaganda, and applying those lessons to perfecting the science of mass mind control on a host of issues that are deleterious to the well-being of middle class White Americans.

As for smoking itself, one other reason it disappeared so (relatively) quickly from the culture is because people really were prematurely dying from it by the truckloads. The evidence, laboratory and real world, is that smoking industrially packaged cigarettes in any frequency beyond the casual, socially lubricating one or two cigs is obviously bad for you. The obviousness of smoking’s lethality doubtless helped supercharge the wider shaming incentives to encourage people to quit.

But this topic is trickier than that. It may be true, for instance, that getting a little bit of nicotine into your blood has health benefits, because it acts as a minor stressor which in turn activates anti-aging cellular mechanisms. So while smoking two packs a day will send you to an early grave, smoking one or two hand-rolled, lightly-filtered cigs made from fresh-leafed tobacco a couple times per week might actually improve a number of physiological markers.

The social angle of smoking is equally as interesting as the physiological angle. Smoking does make men appear more masculine. (It’s a mixed result for women, who can either look trashy or sultry while smoking.) Smoking does seem to lighten moods and grease conversation. I smoke a cig now and then, (mostly, when I find myself in the rare venue that allows it), and I get a lot of leery looks from SWPL chicks who want to join or ask me in a roundabout way why I don’t conform to social expectations about smoking in public. It’s a pretty good passive opener, I’ve found. My total inhalation, though, is probably no more than a few hand-rolled cigs per month. I’m sure a lot of former smokers have neural wiring that disposes to addiction, so for them total abstention is the only answer.

Despite my occasional indulgence and admission that smoking is a masculine social ritual, I think the war against smoking in the US and the banning of it from public venues was generally a good thing. Occasionally, the elite get it right (or rather, used to get it right). Besides the health factor, it’s also pleasing to come home with the scent of a woman’s perfume on my clothes rather than the scent of a woman’s perfume + stale cigarette smoke.

A couple of final points: the en masse abandonment of smoking is in line with the general Western trend toward abandonment of male masculinity (and embrace of female masculinity — I think there are more young female smokers than young male smokers now). American men are healthier and less smelly, but they’re also more effeminate.

And, it’s useful to think of the anti-smoking movement as the precursor to the rise of the SJWs. Smoking was first reviled as unhealthy, then it was reviled as gauche, offensive, and low class. The sort of thing BadWhites do. This would become the template for our current crop of SJW witch burners.

8. Randall Parker on Peak Median Income, by US county. And here he reminds spergitarians caught up in their fantasies about mass incarceration of minor drug offenders that only 17% of state prison inmates are there primarily for drug offenses. Bottom line: the US locks up a lot of ultraviolent bastards for long periods of time, and this makes everyone safer, and probably* has the beneficial knock-off effect of reducing the fertility of the worst of the worst, which will pay huge dividends for your children and grandchildren.

*Chicks do dig ultraviolent jerks, but if the jerks are locked up before their reproductive years really kick into high gear, and conjugal visits are prohibited, it’s possible to put a real dent in their genetic contributions to future generations.

9. P. D. Mangan has a new book coming out titled Muscle Up. I’ve learned a lot about nutrition, supplements, optimizing muscle growth, anti-aging strategies, and the concept of hormesis from his site, so this book deserves a reading. And the proof is in the author. Mangan looks in better shape than most men half his age. Other good posts: Increase autophagy to extend your lifespan. How to simultaneously lose fat and gain muscle.

10. America’s art schools are now nothing more than art-less propaganda vehicles for anti-White male, anti-Western hatred. The institutional structure of academic arts and humanities must be destroyed and the earth under their smoldering foundations salted for good measure. Kill it all with fire, and watch in wonder as new vegetation emerges and long-dormant saplings stretch their leaves to the sun.

Posted in Love, Ugly Truths | 281 Comments »

Trolling Gullible Shitlibs Is Getting Easier (Because They “Want To Believe”)

Oct 4th, 2015 by CH

Sam Hyde (of Million Dollar Extreme fame) trolled the holy fuck outta CNN goobers.

At 0:18, watch for the Easter egg crotch blackout.

Posted in Funny/Lolblogs, Hope and Change, Videos | 45 Comments »

Dildoween

Oct 4th, 2015 by CH

Comments are closed.

Posted in Funny/Lolblogs, Music, Videos | 34 Comments »

Comment Of The Week: Only The Nice Die Lonely

Oct 4th, 2015 by CH

COTW winner is tsparks156, cutting to the quick with his trenchant observation about one of the primary characteristics that distinguishes assholes from niceguys.

In my time I have seen many unfortunate nice guys that are lonely. I’m trying to remember if I have ever met a lonely asshole.

This sounds like the beginning of a beautiful country music tune.

***

COTW runner-up is shartiste, springboarding off the Ahmud hoax bomb story that has so animated shitlibs and President Butt Naked, to outline a general theory of cultural decline resulting from the equalist project of raising the Defective/Normal Ratio of society:

The scope and brazenness of this hoax speaks to how out of touch elites are with the common man. Yet it also gives hope. All the conspiracy theories about how these smart rich people masterfully control everything fail on one point: elites don’t truly understand what makes people tick, so they can never fully win hearts and minds of the masses. They will always have their defective cheerleaders: the fat and slutty, the eunuchs and gammas. But normal, typical people will see through these gambits. That is why the keystone strategy of liberals is to raise the defective/normal ratio in a society and win with the one-two defectives/democracy combo punch.

They do this most obviously by simply importing defectives and more gradually with conversion, by turning otherwise normal people into defectives by making women slutty workaholics, men weak cucks. Media has been doing this but its been a slow grind since the 60s and many are resistant because their biomechanics are averse to it.

This is why we have hope, albeit temporary. When normals have an option, they will always be won over by leaders that intuitively understand them. These leaders will have an advantage because they work with people’s sensibilities and people need far less Machiavellian persuasion this way. Messages become simple: Build Wall. No Rapists. Better Deals. Let’s Win. Obvious truths negate decades of carefully insidious progressive demoralization of the masses. Those in control take great care to make sure these leaders never break in to the arena, because once they do they are not the heel, they are the hero. The barriers to entry are high.

Trump is the first to make it. He may not be the last. But he may also be the last chance. When the defective/normal ratio tips too high, coupled with universal suffrage, the state is doomed. If Trump gets cockblocked it will be an interesting century for America or whatever is left of it.

May we live in Trumpening times.

***

A two-fer for shartiste.

A nascent HBDer that thinks he’s clever might suggest that the univeralist blank-slatism of white liberals is a culture that mirrors their genes. I’d argue that it is not, but rather a tendency toward status-whoring. Those who can’t achieve status through more traditional means lean on liberal politics to signal intelligence and status, buttressed by media and Hollywood liberal signalling. This blank-slate diversitard stuff isn’t in anyone’s genes, if it was then rich liberals wouldn’t live in 95% white enclaves.

HBDers would argue that the genes are the causal agent that germinates the expression of status whoring and whatever is the contemporary outlet for socially signaling one’s moral superiority. So one could say both the HBDer and shartiste’s views are simultaneously operative. I do think shartiste’s point about the numerical growth of shitlib defectives meaning that there will be more empty status signaling by SJWs who couldn’t accrue real status is spot on.

***

Let’s make it a three-fer for shartiste!

lots of times when a guy “suddenly lost interest” its because he got the notch. women often omit this detail from their “I got ghosted” stories, they don’t want to believe putting out can vacuum the attraction out of a guy that quickly, especially when it had the opposite effect on them, but the novel new nookie brings a clarity that had been clouded to the man in pursuit.

Men fall asleep after sex. Women want to talk, cuddle, and get reassurances that their love is reciprocated after sex. That right there should be enough to clue even the stupidest gender bender feminist that men and women are fundamentally different in their psychologies.

Posted in Comment Winners | 88 Comments »

A Shorn Chimp

Oct 3rd, 2015 by CH

Here’s a picture of a freshly shorn chimp.

Awesome pic. Great size. Looks solid. Thick. Tight. Keep us posted on your continued progress in the jungle with any new pics or chest-beating vids. Show us what you got chimp. Wanna see how huge, solid, thick, and ripped you can get. Wanna see you throwing iron with the strength of ten non-millennial men. Calves need work, tho. Thanks for the motivation. Jacked ape rape!

Posted in Alpha | 140 Comments »

Flirting Fails: Dudes Who Drag Their Dates Into Sports Talk

Oct 3rd, 2015 by CH

Even if a girl likes you and shows it by feigning interest, don’t be one of those dudes who ensnares his date in the quagmire of sports talk. As you’re getting excited by your good fortune to find a girl who makes you think she likes going over the finer points of the zone defense, she’s drying up like a Central Valley megadrought.

Just because you’ve found a girl who’s willing to be a good sport about your sports fanaticism, doesn’t mean you should test her resolve. You want to get laid? Drop the sports talk, and start communicating with her in the language of love: her own voice.

Posted in Dating, Rules of Manhood | 98 Comments »

CH Maxim #16: A Woman Never Falls Out Of Love With A Selfish Jerk

Oct 2nd, 2015 by CH

This post will have many detractors, but if they would stop and think about what they have actually observed happening when women and their beloved jerkboys break up, they will see the wisdom in CH Maxim #16: A woman never falls out of love with a selfish jerk.

This does not mean a woman never ends a relationship with a selfish jerk. It means that, even when the woman initiates the break-up (usually from desperate frustration at her failed attempts to extract a tiny concession toward domestication from her jerkboy), she will continue feeling strong love for the incorrigible jerk who makes her swoon.

A woman’s love, once ignited, is hard to extinguish. But there are ways in which women genuinely fall out of love. Being a jerk is not one of them.

Here is a list of the most common scenarios that can cause a woman’s love for a man to wither and die.

  • the formerly lovable jerkboy turns beta while lounging in the comfort bubble of a long-term relationship or marriage.

This is the biggest reason why women fall out of love. The charming jerkboys they once knew transformed into boring beta males suckling at their teats for emotional nourishment. Marriage/LTRs are not only fattening agents, they also acts as hardening agents on women’s hearts, and as solvents on men’s scrotums.

  • she found a higher status man.

Female hypergamy is a bitch. Darkly, women can fall out of love if they meet a man superior in many ways to their current lovers. It’s not nearly as common as scenario #1 above, because love tends to dampen women’s hypergamous instinct.

  • she lost weight and suddenly found herself the center of male attention.

Women can fall in love with lower SMV men if their self-perception is that they are themselves low SMV. But woe to the beta male who marries a fatty who later slims down (it’s been known to happen). She will “feel her oats” and her love will migrate from her loser man who settled for her to better men with options who actively CHOOSE her newly slender sexiness.

The above are the big three explanations for how women fall out of love.

What you will never see: A woman falling out of love with her man because he was too much of a charming, narcissistic, selfish jerkboy to her.

She may very well end her RELATIONSHIP with the jerk, but that’s not the same as ending her LOVE for him. In fact, you will often hear freshly single women lament their lingering love for the jerkboys they had to let go to spare their sanity (or to find a man willing to give them marriage and children). You know, you’ll hear stuff like,

“I still love him, but it wasn’t going anywhere.”

“I’ll never stop loving him, but I had to do what was right for me.”

“GOD, you make this so difficult!”

“I’ll never stop having feelings for you.”

“Is this what you wanted? IS THIS WHAT YOU WANTED?!”

“We’re done. I can’t take it anymore. You had my love, everything. Why did you throw it away?”

When a woman ends a relationship with a jerkboy, she leaves with love still fluttering in her heart. A deluge of her tears will accompany the jerk’s exit from her life. (For his part, he will leave sad, but not cripplingly sad, and not at all worried about finding another girl, and this will naturally drive the woman crazy and deeper in love.) Her words will ring with tragic exasperation, and sorrow for what she feels unwilling to do. It will take months, sometimes years, sometimes longer than that, for her to fully get over the jerk, and achieve some inner peace when she can once again give her body and heart freely to another man without the stigmata of the jerk’s love marking her out as the ex-maiden of a demon’s unearthly magnetism.

Now, compare and contrast to a woman leaving a beta male:

No love in her heart. (only pity, sometimes contempt)
Impeccably trouble-free transition out of the relationship.
No guilt, pained regret, or second thoughts.
No mention of the word “love”.
Cold as ice execution of the break-up.
Outward-focused blame, rather than inward-focused. (she blames herself for the jerk’s inability to commit to her satisfaction. she blames the beta for her loss of desire for him)
Little need to lean on female friends or beta orbiters for emotional support during the post-break-up adjustment period and follow-up rebound dating.

Women leave selfish jerks all the time. But women never really fall out of love with selfish jerks. They carry that jerkboy torch all their lives, a warm nostalgia preserving forever a faint echo of loyalty to the jerkboy and simultaneously an inconvenient barrier to any future betas who might foolishly try to win the full scope of her heart for themselves.

PS There’s a major sex difference on the theme of this post. A man will never leave a sexy woman with heaviness in his heart because she won’t commit to an LTR or otherwise follow his script for their future together. A man in such a situation will privately nurse his disappointment but never think about giving up such a fine piece of ass on the regular. If he does finally give up on her on his own terms, it will be because some other equally cute and marginally less crazy girl started showing interest in him. Men DO fall out of love, though. It happens all the time when women get older and/or fatter.

Posted in Girls, Love, Rules of Manhood, Ugly Truths | 175 Comments »

Socially And Sexually Atomized Atheist Killers and Absent Fathers

Oct 2nd, 2015 by CH

The developing story of Oregon UCC mass murderer Chris Harper-Mercer (mystery meat, half black-half white) has me thinking about the psychologies of mixed race young men and the invisible influence of their absent fathers.

In Mercer’s case, an interesting twist on the usual miscegenation patterns: his absentee father was white and his mother black. Mercer was allegedly an atheist who hated Christians, and had (Hivemind term) “white supremacist” leanings. He also had a huge stash of porn that he streamed to P2P sharing services, which is a major omega male incel tell.

Why would a milk chocolate moonpie identify with White racial consciousness? My theory calls to mind another moonpie with daddy issues: President Butt Naked Obama.

Both men had no-show biological dads growing up, except Butt Naked’s dad was black. The psychology of men during their formative years is irretrievably warped by the absence of a father. This tendency is amplified for mixed race outcasts who will never have it as easy fitting in as monoracial kids, (another good reason to avoid having mystery meats). What happens then is the boy grows into a man who struggles with his identity. This struggle compels him to either completely reject the father as a presence in his mental and emotional universe…

OR

…to embrace the missing father and “force” an identification with him. The son will undertake preternatural “missions of the mind” to locate within himself what he imagines are the resonances and reverberations of his absent father’s spirit. He will spend his life constantly searching for the soul of his missing father, in big and small ways, even as he tells himself and others that his absent biological father is a footnote in his life.

If his absentee father was black, like Obama’s, the mixed race creation will come to identify with all things black, in worldview and emotional connection, if not in cultural accouterments. His white mother will recede in significance to him. If his father was white, like Mercer’s, he will seek the most material manifestations of “whiteness” as his guide to grounding himself into something larger than his airy atheism and brooding “anti-sheeple” solitude. He hopes, through a psychological osmosis, that carrying what he infers would be the banner of his distant father will lift him from his mixcel loneliness.

Throw in a horrible condition like asperger’s or extreme shyness that causes social awkwardness around girls in a society becoming more r-selected and less K-selected, and a single black mom rah-rahing him whatever he does or doesn’t do, and you’ve got your ingredients for a violent explosion at a future date.

This is where HBD and heritability absolutists reveal their short-sightedness: Over time, and given enough societal support and justification, social calamities like single mommery, incel, porn, feminism, equalism, self-esteemism, miscegenation, irreligiousness, sexual and social atomization from a nation rapidly fracturing along the fault lines of antagonistic Diversity™, and oligarchism resulting in mass wealth inequality WILL germinate more lone killers.

The mass murderer is the tip of the viceberg. Most men in this corrupt culture won’t ever entertain the idea of killing as psychological salve. But millions of desperate incel losers underneath that spectacularly violent tip will betray other symptoms of disaffection. And it is these less bloody retreats from American society that will, multiplied ten million times, do the real damage to the last, gossamer wisps of the social fabric.

Posted in Culture, Current Events, Goodbye America, Psy Ops, The Id Monster | 120 Comments »

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

  • PHOTO BLOGS

    Goodbye, America (in a photo)
    Welcome Back, America
  • Donate

  • Archives

  • Gab Feed

    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      Shiloh is very fetching. I like the look she's going for here. Kind of a cross between tradlass and gothgirl. Sultry temptress of the harvest?

      Anyhow, I notice she has prudently covered her arm sleeve tats. Like it or not, people judge on that stuff. Shiloh shows smarts and savvy by playing to the sympathies of the courtroom, or at least avoiding the possibility of anyone in the courtroom making negative snap judgements about her.

      I hope she is freed from this grotesque railroading and then goes on to sue the state for millions. I hear the jury is mostly women. If it's a bunch of nigs, she's doomed. If it's middle-aged or unattractive liberal White women, she might be equally screwed. Women can be quite spiteful toward their sexual competition.

      4 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      This video still is high art. o/

      4 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      White crime stats are inflated with this racial category switcheroo to demoralize Whites, and beaner crime stats are reduced to leave the impression that the beaner invasion is not increasing crime in the US.

      Ron Unz wept.

      4 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      Dennis Kucinich is based. In every way.

      https://collegepill.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/elizabeth-kucinich-9.jpg

      4 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      Orcas are the world's apex predator. They wear dead salmon as hats. They drape seal intestines over their fins for fun. They hunt great white sharks so ruthlessly that the sharks flee their natural hunting grounds. They play with their food.....in a thousand bits. Literally. Orcas have been known to ram large fish so hard that the prey explodes. The buffet line is open for the whole orca family!

      Intelligent, sociable, merciless killers who toy with lesser creatures. The Orca should be on the White Ethnostate flag of the future.

      4 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      The jewniparty desperately wants mass amnesty. The only reason they haven't yet pulled the trigger on it is because neither side of the jewniparty wants to take the blame for it. So a game is being played where Dems get to whine about immigrant rights and Repubs get to complain about the criminal element while each side quietly searches for the right softening rheoric and the opportune time to agree to an amnesty.

      As usual, Whites are left without any real representation.

      5 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      True, race-mixing is actually a little bit more common among White men than it is among White women. The differences are notable, however.

      White women tend to miscegenate with nonwhite species that are far from the White norm, eg negroes, jeets, dune coons, and the blacker spics.

      White men more typically miscegenate with whiter-Latinas and with Orientals. This is not quite as repugnant to the White senses, although it is still inferior to same-race coupling.

      The other big difference is a consequence of the biology of each sex. When White men miscegenate, they don't get pregnant. They can conceivably knock up White women side pieces or return to White women to make White babies.

      In sharp contrast, when White women miscegenate, they get pregnant and are out of the mate market for a long time (nine months plus a few years they spend all their energy raising the monstrous infant or toddler). A White woman pregnant with a mixed-race abomination cannot just go and have a White baby with a White man. Worse, when she births the frizzbomb, the presence of it will actively turn off White men, robbing her of yet more opportunities to redeem herself by snagging a White man.

      Consequently, many years of her fertility are sacrificed and she suffers a much larger opportunity cost to have a White baby than would be the case for a race-mixing White man.

      It strikes modrens as unfair, but these are sociobiological realities, and Nature does not care about our ideas of fairness. A woman's womb is simply more precious to the tribe than is a man's sperm.

      5 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      The direction of causation runs both ways. In sexual politics, it takes two to tango. That's what makes the problem so seemingly intractable. White men and women must meet in the middle, or it won't work out. Women have to show loyalty (sexual and racial fidelity). Men have to show strength (hierarchical dominance and social supremacy).

      The catch is that the entire societal machinery of Weimerica has made it impossible and downright dangerous for White men to tap into those masculine virtues, while it has made it exceedingly easy and personally beneficial for White women to abandon their virtues.

      5 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      This is known as Pawgatory.

      5 days ago
    • Gaul Atreides @gaulatreides

      White women will not get White men's strength until White men are assured White women's loyalty.

      This is the bind. My suggestion: Name and shame the White woman race traitors. Women respond to mockery and to social shunning. It will be more effective if the shaming coomes from other White women, but any bit of shaming will help.

      Ultimately, the jewish control of our racial mythos and public discourse will have to be dismantled for White women to fully heal from their self-destruction indoctrination.

      5 days ago

    View on Gab →

  • Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.

  • Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.

    Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.

  • PAGES

    About
    Alpha Assessment Submissions
    Beta Of The Year Contest Submissions
    Dating Market Value Test For Men
    Dating Market Value Test For Women
    Diversity + Proximity = War: The Reference List
    Shit Cuckservatives Say
    The Sixteen Commandments Of Poon

  • Recent Comments

    • markgm28 on Ministry Of Twatter
    • Augustus on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
    • r1verboatgambler on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
    • Ironsides on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
    • r1verboatgambler on America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
  • Categories

  • GAME

    60 Years of Challenge
    Alpha Game
    Krauser PUA
    Rational Male
    Roosh V
    Tenmagnet
    Treatise of Love

  • MAGA MEN

    Alternative Right
    AmRen
    Anonymous Conservative
    Audacious Epigone
    Dusk in Autumn
    Education Realist
    Evo and Proud
    Gene Expression
    Hail to You
    Hawaiian Libertarian
    Lion of the Blogosphere
    My Posting Career
    PA World and Times
    Page for men
    Parapundit
    Rogue Health and Fitness
    Steve Sailer
    The Anti-Gnostic
    The Kakistocracy
    The Red Pill Review
    Unqualified Reservations
    Vox Popoli
    West Hunter
    Whiskey’s Place

  • SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS

    Alias Clio
    Arts & Letters Daily
    Deconstructing Leftism
    Feminine Beauty
    hbd chick
    Human Biological Diversity
    Library of Hate
    Overcoming Bias
    Stuff White People Like

  • TOP POSTS

    • Ministry Of Twatter
    • America Vs Poland: Vulvo Edition
    • Women Are Anathema To Revolutionary Movements
    • ¡SCIENCE! Externally Validates CH Poon Commandment VIII
    • 1984 Was A Starter’s Guide

Chateau Heartiste © 2026 All Rights Reserved.

Free WordPress Themes


Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion