Why do permanent breasts exist?
It’s an evolutionary mystery, considering that human females are the only species to have permanent pontoons. In every other mammal, the breast engorges during lactation, then shrinks. So engorged breasts in non-human species signal to the males that the female is infertile, therefore there would have been no evolutionary selection pressure for the females to develop persistent pendulums nor the males to be attracted to them.
Yet, in human females, the enduring endoplasm has reached fixation, and men lust for them.
The latest theory to address the mystery states that breasts evolved as an *infertility* signal rather than a fertility signal. The durable double lattes gave a reproductive advantage to women because it selected for men who were dependable and willing to stick around to help raise young even when their mates weren’t capable of getting pregnant.
>>A male primate who is not put off by, or even attracted to, breasts will stay with a female protecting her when she is in her most vulnerable state—during pregnancy and just after childbirth. For a female to select for such males improves her chances of successful reproduction. Moreover, in an environment where it is an advantage for males to stay with and support a female, a taste for breasts can keep the male investing in his own interest at the most critical time for support. In essence, permanent breasts had a pre-historic purpose of separating the men from the ‘f–kboys.’>>
This theory suggestively asserts that intelligence and male arousal for big breasts are linked. The more intelligent (ie K-selected) the race, the more the men express a preference for “big booba” over “big boota”.
Naturally, this finding enraged the equalists, but it does explain a lot about White vs black sexual markets.
https://www.unz.com/article/breasts-buttocks-and-the-lefts-love-hate-relationship-with-science/
