↻ Reposted
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1318541501434122240
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1318541501434122240
Oct 20th, 2020 by
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Agree & Amplify is the standard response protocol.
Her: "I bet all you care about are boobs"
Chad: "I also care about butts"
Easy to apply this same rhetorical format to jews.
jew: "you're a white nationalist nazi"
Chad: "Thanks! From the river to the sea, kike."
-
It's weird how much similarity there exists in the psychologies of jews, women, and blacks.
They will push and push and push until they get slapped hard, and only then will they submit. It's the feminine psychology of the shit test. If White men keep failing their shit tests, they will shit test harder out of spite and triumphal egotism.
-
Married White women lean slightly Republican. SIngle White women vote Democrat, nearly on par with the voting habits of nonwhites.
(jewesses vote 90+% D, which is an even bigger skew than blacks! this should tell us something about the influential role that female jews have played in the corruption of White women.)
Married White men are the "reddest" vote bloc.
Understanding that D vs R in practice doesn't reflect the wishes of the electorate, it is still true that people vote according to their preferences and values, and they have had locked-in perceptions of what each wing of the jewniparty represents.
Single White women who vote D do so because the D Party represents faggotry, grrlpower, abortion, limitless nonwhite invasion, feminism, and anti-racism. Subconsciously, they vote D because the State serves as their stand-in husband substitute, providing for her and protecting her (usually from her own stupid choices).
Married White women lean R because their interest is in protecting their husbands' status and resources from a rapacious State or from social rot and disorder that would threaten their husbands' ability to provide.
These are the basic sociosexual facts of modern politics, and probably of politics going back to the first tribal plebiscite. Study after study shows this to be true. We can argue about causal chains -- for example, are more sensible women more likely to get married, or does marriage make women more sensible? -- but that won't alter the political landscape.
Woman's suffrage, sexual emancipation, retreat from marriage and motherhood, and left-leaning voting habits are both a cause and a symptom of declining empire. All of what we see happening today is a giant positively reinforcing feedback loop of civdeath.
Glubb, Spengler, and many other luminaries astutely noted that female "liberation" always preceded an empire's collapse. Do we blame women, or do we blame the loss of the native stock's virtues that surrendered to a more permissible attitude toward women? I suspect the blame goes both ways.
Allowing only propertied and/or married White men to vote would solve a lot of our problems. The Founders were not stupid about this. But the Founders didn't have to deal with an omnipresent jewish propaganda network. Absent the removal of that agitprop octopus, voting rights changes are impossible, and even if possible, unlikely to produce what the Founders envisioned.
-
Toxic Diversity at it again.
-
If antifa whites knew all of what Lincoln believed and were aware of his many writings, they would spray red over the Lincoln Memorial and try to topple his statues and erase him from our history, like they tried with Robert Lee, et al.
This would eexplain why the jewish media and its shabbos foot soldiers rarely if ever spotlight those words of Lincoln, or produce long tendentious documentaries about Lincoln's less publicized racial beliefs.
They understand that there has to be at least one White cipher to elevate as the national symbol of anti-racism. Take that away, and Whites are left with no "heroes", a dangerous outcome for those intent on keeping Whites mollified with a fake and gay national mythos.
-
The only winners of WW2 were the deracinated capitalists and the jews.
-
Also no menorahs on public properties.
-
What does the future hold for White men? If there are no political solutions as understood in the current context, then what form will rebellion take as the rusty hinges fall off Weimarica?
Three possibilities jump to mind.
- Infiltration
White Nationalist Socialists (using the term socialist in its traditional connotation to mean concern for the well-being of one's racial kin and for the harmonious functioning of one's extended national family) would place themselves within existing power stuctures to steer them toward WNS goals. Or, once embedded, would operate as saboteurs and spies to undermine the existing power structures.
- Unionization
WNS would organize into groups that are large enough to collectively push pro-White policies and to thwart anti-White attack vectors. Solidarity in number is a potent force, useful for changing institutional behaviors or for establishing competing institutions.
- Rejection
White men drop out of society, disgusted with a system they correctly perceive exists only to actively dispossess them of their inheritance and heritage, and to denigrate their values.
Each has its advantages.
Infiltration evades Regime gateways that surveills for activity considered threatening to the Regime.
Unionization openly advocates for White interests, boosting the morale of Whites, and circumventing subversive tactics by the enemy.
Rejection undermines the Regime from within, causing acompetency crisis that discredits it.All three can happen, but Rejection is the most likely path for the majority of White men. They will simply drop out, and the system with grind down, impoverishing many and pushing the parasites to run for the exits.
- Infiltration
-
As any man who's lived a day in his life will tell you, a woman's complaints increase the harder he works to resolve them.
-
This is the logic that trips up white knightoids. If women are slave to their whims and at the mercy of external influences, having no moral agency or self-direction whatsoever, then effectively women are children. Wards of the state, or of their husbands. And if that is how our institutions will treat women, then their rights must be limited in scope similar to how we limit the rights of children.
No vote, to start.
Women will gladly take zero accountability but with all the privileges of responsibility, if men give it to them. That's a feelgood but logically incoherent emotional reaction to the demands of a rights-centered society that has forgotten the other half of the equation: duties and accountability.
We can have politically disempowered women, or we can have accountability for women to the same degree we have it for men.
But we cannot have both without society falling apart from all the internal contradictions. The choice must be made.
Patriarchy, or gynarcho-tyranny.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
