↻ Reposted
https://mobile.twitter.com/PatrickByrne/status/1346289254075428864
https://mobile.twitter.com/PatrickByrne/status/1346289254075428864
Jan 4th, 2021 by
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Also no menorahs on public properties.
-
What does the future hold for White men? If there are no political solutions as understood in the current context, then what form will rebellion take as the rusty hinges fall off Weimarica?
Three possibilities jump to mind.
- Infiltration
White Nationalist Socialists (using the term socialist in its traditional connotation to mean concern for the well-being of one's racial kin and for the harmonious functioning of one's extended national family) would place themselves within existing power stuctures to steer them toward WNS goals. Or, once embedded, would operate as saboteurs and spies to undermine the existing power structures.
- Unionization
WNS would organize into groups that are large enough to collectively push pro-White policies and to thwart anti-White attack vectors. Solidarity in number is a potent force, useful for changing institutional behaviors or for establishing competing institutions.
- Rejection
White men drop out of society, disgusted with a system they correctly perceive exists only to actively dispossess them of their inheritance and heritage, and to denigrate their values.
Each has its advantages.
Infiltration evades Regime gateways that surveills for activity considered threatening to the Regime.
Unionization openly advocates for White interests, boosting the morale of Whites, and circumventing subversive tactics by the enemy.
Rejection undermines the Regime from within, causing acompetency crisis that discredits it.All three can happen, but Rejection is the most likely path for the majority of White men. They will simply drop out, and the system with grind down, impoverishing many and pushing the parasites to run for the exits.
- Infiltration
-
As any man who's lived a day in his life will tell you, a woman's complaints increase the harder he works to resolve them.
-
This is the logic that trips up white knightoids. If women are slave to their whims and at the mercy of external influences, having no moral agency or self-direction whatsoever, then effectively women are children. Wards of the state, or of their husbands. And if that is how our institutions will treat women, then their rights must be limited in scope similar to how we limit the rights of children.
No vote, to start.
Women will gladly take zero accountability but with all the privileges of responsibility, if men give it to them. That's a feelgood but logically incoherent emotional reaction to the demands of a rights-centered society that has forgotten the other half of the equation: duties and accountability.
We can have politically disempowered women, or we can have accountability for women to the same degree we have it for men.
But we cannot have both without society falling apart from all the internal contradictions. The choice must be made.
Patriarchy, or gynarcho-tyranny.
-
Might be a good thing for Western women to feel that burden again. Hardship strengthens men and pacifies women.
-
I wonder how much of this insane primal female anger against men is driven by the social expectation to avoid identifying nonwhite men as the primary abusers of women, and how much is driven by White women's growing resentment toward White men they deem weak for not putting them in their place?
-
The Republican Party is a vehicle for Whites to negotiate their terms of surrender.
-
Charles Murray agrees with Hitler.
-
I'm not sure what would be more embarrassing for you. If that was AI, or if it was real.
-
The litmus test for White in-group solidarity will be if Whites routinely take up the revolutionary banner of jury nullification when White defendants are accused of crimes against the Anti-White Regime. May we all live to see the day.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
