↻ Reposted
Every single time
Every single time@Heartiste @sdfgefgsdf
Oct 10th, 2019 by
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
I wonder how much of this insane primal female anger against men is driven by the social expectation to avoid identifying nonwhite men as the primary abusers of women, and how much is driven by White women's growing resentment toward White men they deem weak for not putting them in their place?
-
The Republican Party is a vehicle for Whites to negotiate their terms of surrender.
-
Charles Murray agrees with Hitler.
-
I'm not sure what would be more embarrassing for you. If that was AI, or if it was real.
-
The litmus test for White in-group solidarity will be if Whites routinely take up the revolutionary banner of jury nullification when White defendants are accused of crimes against the Anti-White Regime. May we all live to see the day.
-
Are those the lips rabbis get after sucking baby peen?
-
I didn't want to go down this road (again), because it's such a dank topic (like a whore's blistered womb chute), but the current troubles inspire me to splay my pearls of wisdom across the belly of Whoremerica.
Briefly, centuries of socially enforced and dispositionally organic monogamy, accompanied by very long eras of relative peace and prosperity, as Whites have experienced, results in the entrenchment of the one man-one woman mating system.
Not all men and women participate, but the vast majority do. It is a good system, because it incentivizes male investment in the wider society and in the future for their children, for whom they enjoy a high degree of paternity assurance.
There is price to be paid, though, and that price is the fulfillment of female hypergamous urges. In the monogamy system, women have to sacrifice their primal desire for the top 20% alpha men. That is part of the deal. (Meanwhile, the top 20% of men have to sacrifice their harems. Also part of the deal.)
In time, the deal sours for middle-of-the-belle-curve women, as the socially sanctioned suppression of their hypergamous instinct, coupled with the increasing domestication of the majority beta men available to them, reaches a saturation point beyond which bitterness, intersexual rancor, resentment of motherhood, and near-homicidal hysteria begin to seep from the cracks in the monogamy edifice.
War has typically been the answer for this problem, by culling many young men, but industrialization and the consequent population explosion has meant that war cannot come close to resetting the monogamy mate market with a brief respite of unchained hypergamy. (By dint of sex skew, the surviving men have a higher sexual market value.)
When modren wahms perceive that they are embedded in a mate choice regime that guarantees sexual access to historically weakened, domesticated men, while pumping up the wahms' egos with various cultural shibboleths that extol "female empowerment" and grrlbossery, the stage is set for female spitefulness and man-hatred.
Occasionally, that spitefulness explodes in rage against the children of those weak men.
Not a testable theory, just speculation. Freely offered for your consideration.
-
All these cunts look like succubi. We're gonna need a bigger pit.
-
True. Millions of men deal with hysterical wives, and do so with a high degree of confidence that the wives won't actually spree murder their children.
Rarely, that bet goes sideways.
-
Petition to rename every US-adjacent geographic feature to "[X] penis".
Lake Penis
Gulf of Penis
Continental Penis
North Penis
Mexipenis
Baja Penis
Toronto (penis implied)
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
