↻ Reposted
@Atavator @Miradus For most of human history, race mixing was kept at bay by simple geographic distance, which was then amplified by cultural distance.
It is possible that a strong “anti-race mixing” genetic predisposition never achieved fixation in some White populations because there was never a need for natural and sexual selection to favor those who had anti-race mix genes. Geographic/cultural distance did all the heavy lifting in that department.
What happens in the borderless age of cheap airfare and universalist mania is the mass commingling of different races in White homelands, and not enough of the White native population has the genes to resist mixing with these different races which are now in close proximity to them.
Still, enough Whites do retain a vestigial own-race preference that the race mixing hasn’t utterly enveloped the White West…but the numbers are inching upward without pause.
What I suspect will happen in this multiracial cauldron is strong selection for Whites with anti-race mix genes as the Whites without those genes are “boiled off” into the brown hordes.
Evolution is about the survival of DNA, and evolution will tend to favor those who maximally maintain the integrity of their DNA by only mating with same race people who already share a lot of their structural DNA.
