And Mike and Sven.
I kid, guys! But not really.
Where pretty lies perish.
"Women can destroy any society to which they belong simply by refusing to be wives and mothers. Feminism brings such a refusal about by directly undermining women’s ability to love. No less than other hostile forces discussed on this website, it is a deadly threat to European Civilization."
Feminism not just undermines women's ability to love. It also undermines women's ability to BE loved, by stripping them of their natural femininity and vulnerability.
Modern Woman has made herself UNCHERISHABLE. Incapable of being cherished by a man, and men will respond to this new reality by investing exactly that much they would give to anyone who is merely a transactional participant in life's milestones, which is to say, not much at all.
"The other side of male bias in women’s favor is what the author calls “the empathy gap”—the often-shocking inability or unwillingness of many women to empathize with male suffering. She recounts that after the sinking of the Titanic, a group of women survivors organized to build a memorial to the men who had sacrificed themselves in the women’s favor:
Some feminists refused gratitude, noting that men had built the ship and therefore could be expected to take their lumps when it proved faulty. Some proclaimed with fury that women suffered daily under men’s cruelty; a single day of suffering and death paled by comparison."
Trump's Stunt would insult Canadians, because Canadians are all gaywads who lap up saintly indigene gruel.
If Canadians weren't so gay and wad, they'd realize Trump renaming Lake Ontario to Lake America is what failing multiracial empires do when the people are no longer organically unified. The empire resorts to the equivalent of corporate brand loyalty to fabricate a fake unity.
"America this" "America that". It's all so try-hard and transparent. The corporate America logo has completely replaced product quality, and diluted its cachet from overuse.
"Fiamengo knows that a crucial element in feminism’s success has been the strong natural bias in favor of women that characterizes both sexes: a synergy between female in-group preference and the male protective instinct. There has been some objective research on this timeless phenomenon. In 1994, for example, psychologists Alice Eagly and Antonio Mladinic reported that both male and female research subjects were more likely to ascribe positive traits to women than to men, with the bias measurably stronger in women; they christened this the “women-are-wonderful” effect. Later studies found women’s in-group bias four and a half times stronger than men’s. In 2019 British psychologists Martin Seager and John Barry developed the concept of “Gamma bias” to describe “unconscious prejudice against men and boys,” as observed in the tendency of both men and women to sympathize more with women than men.
Such studies are valuable, but as with much of social psychology, they merely confirm something that has always been widely known: men are expected to put the needs of women and children first. As Fiamengo points out, feminists could never have achieved the success they have if men were remotely similar to the selfish brutes they depict. Even half a century of feminist fury has been unable to do away with men’s natural bias in women’s favor."
https://www.unz.com/article/second-thoughts-from-an-ex-feminist/
Her: "Gaul, you always have your shields up."
Me: drops shield
Her:
As a sex, women emphasize resource security and social egalitarianism. When women enter politics, as voters or as representatives, they shift government in a direction of greater spending. The size and scope of government grows under female influence, and this phenomenon has occurred throughout history, in all times and places.
But that's only half the story. The other half is the change in the character of a nation's people as it progresses through the Ages of Affluence and Intellectualism (the 20th century in the US). Greed and cynicism become the predominant values of this period, and prosperity funds huge growths in spending that lines the pockets of the administrative class. The nation's wealthy want to retain their wealth, so they begin to use their money to buy off challengers to their rule, and to quell popular discontent. This is what helps usher in the rapid rise of the federal debt. The government largesse attracts women like golddiggers to a venture capital conference.
On the one hand, women entering politics pushes the government leftward and into debt. On the other hand, the people's character changes from emphasizing frugality to emphasizing profligacy. Rising federal debt is therefore both an effect of increased female political participation and a symptom of declining virtue among the founding stock of the nation.
Women: "I have rape fantasies"
Men: What the fuuuuuuck...
Women: "I fantasize about killing my children to spite my husband"
Men: Alright, I'm outta here
If Flock was a person, it would have had multiple restraining orders against it.
How many mothers lash out at the men in their lives by fantasizing about killing their children? The ones who go through with it....are they the tip of the iceberg?
Eve's Curse is real.
Cue Devon Stack's "Welcome to the White race, Italians!"
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s Place
