PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Nora Vincent was a lesbian who disguised herself as a man for 18 months, to learn what it was like to live as the opposite sex. (This was in the early 2000s, before trannymania.)
She wrote a book about it, called "Self-Made Man".
"Vincent stated that, after the experiment, she gained more sympathy for the male condition: "Men are suffering. They have different problems than women have, but they don't have it better. They need our sympathy, they need our love, and they need each other more than anything else. They need to be together."
Apparently, the stress of being a man for a year and a half pushed Nora to commit suicide.
-
This reminds me of that lesbian in New York who decided to impersonate a man for a while, to see what it was like. She wrote a book about her experience that basically concluded men have it much harder than women and feminists are dumb cunts.
-
I remember when paradiddle was an innocent percussionist term. RE-tvr-n-n.
-
Is it possible for acute narcissism to actually separate from the body it inhabits and become a sentient entity captured by AI image generators?
-
What happened between European paganism and Christianity was syncretism -- the merging of two religions via incorporation of rituals, holidays, festivals, and iconography.
In fact, this is probably why Christianity found fertile ground in the heart of Europe: it adopted some aspects of paganism so that it was not entirely alien to the locals.
-
If China is an enemy, it's an enemy that the United Oligarchs of America created when it decided to profitmaxx by airmailing our industry to China to take advantage of their billion-strong cheap labor pool.
-
Gaymulatto: "If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon."
Also Gaymulatto: "Why is America so divided?"
-
For the first 300 years of Christianity's existence, Christians were persecuted. After Christians gained power through Roman edicts and alliances with royal houses, pagans and breakaway Christianity sects were persecuted by Christians.
This is less the story of religion than it is the story of power and human nature.
There was never any widespread genocide, or policy of genocide, by Christians against pagans. Violent forced conversions sporadically occured, but for the most part paganism ended because it fell out of fashion.
-
There are many pagans and "kike on a stick" anti-Christians who want to claim Hitler as a fellow anti-Christian, but the historical record simply doesn't support that claim.
The most notorious passages from "Hitler's Table Talk" are either false translations from the original German, or fake quotes added by stenographers Bormann or Heim.
For example, this quote was attributed to Hitler:
“I shall never come to terms with the Christian lie,” Hitler supposedly said on 27 February 1942. “Our epoch will certainly see the end of the disease of Christianity.”
But this is what Hitler actually said (in the German):
"I have never found pleasure in maltreating others, even if I know it isn’t possible to maintain oneself in the world without force. Life is granted only to those who fight the hardest. It is the law of life: Defend yourself! The time in which we live has the appearance of the collapse of this idea. It can still take 100 or 200 years. I am sorry that, like Moses, I can only see the Promised Land from a distance."
What Hitler is lamenting is not Christianity, but the ethos of Might Makes Right!
Link:
ffrf.org/fttoday/november-2002/articles-novemHitler was personally religious (he was born Catholic) but, like many Christians, expressed doubts and dismay about certain Church practices or influences. As many of us on Gab do now!
The Third Reich's relationship to Christianity could best be described as paternal. Hitler believed Christianity was an integral part of the German culture, and he had no wish to excise it from German life. He criticized some Church ideas (like transubstantiation) and railed against priests or other Church authorities who were antagonistic to national socialism.
But none of that was indicative of any deep-seated animus toward Christianity some want to claim Hitler possessed.
What is important to understand about Hitler and the NatSoc party leadership is that they were blood and soil first, Christian second. There was no "Christian Only" litmus test to serve in the Third Reich. Hitler had atheists and agnostics, Prots and Catholics, as close allies in his administration. Obviously, jews were barred.
As long as Church leaders stayed devoted to the race and to the NatSoc Party, Hitler was happy with them. When they deviated, Hitler criticized them. But Hitler was never a disbeliever in the tenets of Christianity.
-
Is she a hapa? Damn it would be funny if she had liberal White woman blood in her.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
I hate this guy, read one of his trash scifi novels and when I saw how much of a chump he was, it made sense.
LikeLiked by 1 person
If you still do the punchable shitlib face, here is the next winner: http://hechingerreport.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Jennifer-Heller-Kentwell-mug1.jpg
This ‘guy’ wants to rewrite history to leave out our sexist, patriarchy past, nothing new there really, but has a major ykw face.
LikeLike
That creature couldn’t rewrite an excuse absence note from its mother.
LikeLike
You can’t rewrite history. There are ruins from past civilizations in the deserts and the woods and the jungles and the plains.
LikeLike
The main stream media rewrite history all the time.
They even used fake images to have us believe almost no one showed up at Trump’s inauguration.
Hollywood rewrites history all the time, they now have tens of millions of people believe that without 3 black women the USA could have not send men to the moon.
University professors rewrite history all the time, that is why most white liberals hate their own race, culture and history.
Lying and cheating unfortunately is part of human nature, it is actually a HUGE part of human nature, which is why most of everything around us is based on something false.
LikeLike
@Canadian Friend
No one, in his heart of hearts, believes that 3 black women are capable of ANYTHING.
LikeLiked by 1 person
LikeLike
Does this qualify him for disability?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I had a genuine lol at this. Saved that graph very handy.
LikeLike
[…] John Scalzi, Pixelated […]
LikeLike
I had no idea who this guy was till you and Vox started in on him. But as someone who has been involved with the publishing field, I will say this: The problem isn’t Scalzi per se, but the people who run the industry who give authors like him book deals. If you deal with people inside that field, you’ll find female “agents” (gag) and editors so didactic and feminist it will seem like you stepped into a nightmare.
How did this happen?! Literature used to be the field of Hemmingway, Steinbeck, Salinger and other greats. Now it’s degenerated into readable soap operas by and for women.
How and why are a small group of women deciding who does and doesn’t get published? They’re a bunch of creepy Ivy Leaguers with barren wombs and barren brains. They’re making Young Adult novels advertisements for BLM and Planned Parenthood. This is what needs to change. Taking on Scalzi is like picking at a sore when the whole body is suffering from AIDS. It might temporarily feel good, but there are bigger issues at hand.
LikeLiked by 3 people
He wishes he is in his early 30s, he is in his late 40s. With the body of a 60 year old woman.
LikeLike
The Senate ordered a study on this to confirm that Men and women are equal in strength. The USArmy conducted the study by selecting a group of women volunteers to go through a massive strength training regimen meant to bring these women up to the strength of men, proving that it’s possible. At the end of the study, these women who’d committed a substantial amount of time to lifting heavy weights and bulking up, were tested.
The top 10% were now as strong as the bottom 10% of Men in the Army. You can’t strength-train women into Men.
(You also can’t “educate” people into being intelligent and thoughtful)
LikeLike
See what happens when you try to make laws and standards off of the exception, as though it somehow disproves the rule? You get John Scalzi as an internet personality and “author.” I wonder in what other fields and in what other demographics this tried and proven dynamic applies to? Exceptions always prove the rule.
LikeLike
Pinterest, etc. are rife with memes about being strong (not just strong for a girl).
I am strong for a girl. Pulled 350# twice the other day. Bench my body weight. My husband works long hard days, can’t make the gym as often as he’d like. After the hol Days we went for a workout. Completely cold and seven weeks out of gym, he pulls 325# no sweat and puts up a 1.5x BW bench without even trying.
Men are always stronger than women. If a woman is stronger than you, consider where you’re going wrong.
LikeLike
To be fair, that rich midget guy from game of thrones is probably doing alright, and he may not be as strong as his (I assume) 6ft Victoria secret model girlfriend.
LikeLike
Men are also more variable than women, which means that there will be some incredibly strong men, but most women will be similar to each other. Look at the pic and how spread the blue dots are, and how concentrated the green dots are.
This variability among males is present for many other qualities, including size and IQ. Which is why almost all geniuses are men.
LikeLike