Feed on
Posts
Comments

Category Archive for 'Science Validates Game'

Nestled warmly in the Chateau archives, a House Lord wrote that hotter women means better sex for men. A chart was included to drive home the point: In the interest of science, I’ve put my beauty-to-cumload comparison in a handy chart: hotness of woman               size of load               squirt distance 0                                            *                                * 1                                            *                                * 2                                            *                                * 3                                            pre-cum … Read more

Read Full Post »

Or that it can work. Anyways, how did I miss this? Scientists actually reviewed Mystery’s accelerated seduction blueprint, and what they discovered will surely wither further the already diminutive hearts of manboobs, freaks, monsters, feminists, losers, dweebs, omegas, white knights, traditionalists and slithery “academics” pretending to be feminists in order to score hipster chick poon: The … Read more

Read Full Post »

A common anti-male prerogative hater tactic is to concern troll womanizers about their life trajectories. It usually takes this form: “What are you going to do? Spend your best years banging one woman after another, and then wind up old and alone? Don’t you want healthy kids?” Those players who want kids have nothing to … Read more

Read Full Post »

Peacocking — the art of wearing outrageous ensembles and eye-catching baubles — is much-maligned, both within and without the seduction community. Nowadays, when people hear the word “peacocking”, they scoff as their minds race to images of pickup artist Mystery and his gigantic furry hats, eye liner, jumbled bracelets, and Victorian long coats. sure he … Read more

Read Full Post »

A reader sent along a link to a study which attempted to clarify which kinds of approach “openers” (pickup lines or greetings) worked best on women. The science, while far from conclusive (results were based on women’s self-reported preferences, so usual caveats apply), is finally having a say in this eternal debate between direct and … Read more

Read Full Post »

Providing evidence ♥♥♥YET AGAIN♥♥♥ for another Chateau Heartiste maxim, a study has come out which finds that women love men who parcel their displays of love unpredictably (h/t: reader George). I Heart Unpredictable Love TO love is to suffer; to be happy is to love. So must one suffer to be happy? This syllogism won’t … Read more

Read Full Post »

Baumeister, the primary coauthor behind the seminal 2004 paper titled “Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Social Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions”, has released online the latest addition to that work, titled “Sexual Economics, Culture, Men, and Modern Sexual Trends“, another steely-eyed examination of the sexes that pretty much validates the core Chateau Heartiste concept … Read more

Read Full Post »

Four years ago, this esteemed blog laid out in detail the reasons why men can’t be friends with bangable women, and under which conditions male-female friendships could plausibly form and endure. Men and women simply cannot be friends unless certain conditions are met. Mutual lack of attraction This is easy. When there’s no loin burning … Read more

Read Full Post »

What ho! Another scientific study ♥♥♥confirming♥♥♥ CH observations about the functioning of female sexuality? You bet! Women with stable but not-so-sexy mates become more distant, critical during periods of high fertility. Long after women have chosen Mr. Stable over Mr. Sexy, they struggle unconsciously with the decision, according to a new study by UCLA researchers who … Read more

Read Full Post »

« Newer Posts