What’s more degrading:
a. paying a whore because you have no other way to get laid
b. sleeping with this for free:
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥
A Valentine’s Day Thought Experiment
Feb 14th, 2012 by Heartiste
60 Responses to “A Valentine’s Day Thought Experiment”
Leave a Reply
PHOTO BLOGS
Archives
Gab Feed
-
Cameras at the check-out line. Cameras at the gym. Your face uploaded to data server farms. So why worry about Flock?
Well then, maybe it's time to start worrying about all of it. Maybe we should rethink the wisdom of this edifice of photo surveillance we've constructed around our daily lives.
Oh, but that would mean rethinking related artificial edifices of modernity, such as overrunning our society with a hundred million nonwhite invaders.
-
Why are these cameras stationed at trailheads? What the hell does a consortium of private and government agencies need to know about hikers?
If you can't get away from Berg Brother in the woods, then what's left as an escape? The bathroom?
-
The best aspect of Patriot Front is that it reminds the System that White racialism as a political movement didn't die with Charlottesville.
And Patriot Front will be just one organizational reminder. Others are coming.
-
The safest parts of America -- where people keep their front doors unlocked and lemonade stands have honor system payment jars -- didn't get that way because of Flock cameras.
-
Garrett Langley has that same unsettling, waxen look of Jared Kushner. There's something disturbing going on with the appearances of so many of our "elites".
-
Imagine if Flock were required to send a notification to your phone every time you were detected by one of its systems, with a link to see the photo / video / data, on a page with a button allowing the user to delete that data? How quickly do you think people would become alarmed?
selfevident.connorboyack.com/p/safety-is-the-
I like the idea of mandated Flock notifications. If the average person were to get continual phone updates of their Flock detection, complete with paparazzi-like photos of him or her eating an ice cream cone or nose-picking or stretching after a jog, at numerous random locations, I bet there would be a mass outcry.
And people would start to seriously wonder if the authorities in whom they put their faith are in fact working for them....or for something else.
-
Part of the human experience is the pleasure of not being seen, not being known, not being assessed....of getting away from prying eyes, even if for a moment.
The Mass Surveillance State coming to life like some Flockenstein monster will rob us of that part of our humanity. The prying eyes will be everywhere. There won't be any escape. You will feel those cameras groping you, from nooks you can't see.
The stress and despair this will add to every person's life will dwarf the sense of safety from the perception that crime is being curtailed.
-
To those with entrenched political power, dissent is domestic terrorism.
To those with entrenched institutional power, the experts must never be questioned.
To those with entrenched cultural power, heresy is hatred. -
Who will watch the watchers?
Apparently, no one. Because that would be domestic terrorism, according to our new techtopia overlords.
-
In May 2025, Flock was developing a new product called Nova that the company referred as a "public safety data platform," which would supplement ALPR data with information from data breaches, public records, and commercially available data in order to track specific individuals without a warrant, and which as of May 2025 was already in use by law enforcement in an Early Access program. The Electronic Frontier Foundation described Flock Nova as a "dystopian panopticon".
You won't be able to take a nature walk without Flock and government employees knowing about it.
I feel safer already.
-
PAGES
Recent Comments
Categories
GAME
MAGA MEN
SYLLOGISM AND SYNTHESIS
-
TOP POSTS
-
A. Not because of the whore bit but because you have no other way…
A juicy Double Whopper….that’s been sitting in a dumpster for a few days…hmmm…should I just pick the maggots off?
which has the nicer snatch?
There’s no room for dignity in this shootout.
Go with a) and call it a transaction. At least the capitalist tint makes it a little less odious.
Dude don’t put things that scary in an RSS feed. Seriously, I was eating when I saw that.
i would do the whore.
i got issues.
b is beyond degrading, it’s physiologically impossible for most.
a may be degrading to some degree, but if you’re cruising across the nevada desert solo there are worse ways to stop and catch a shower.
Don’t forget the most SOUL-CRUSHING choice of all, choice (C):
Paying for sex on a daily basis (or monthly via check) but NOT getting sex, i.e., having a wife or ex-wife.
I would gladly take option a, failing that …shoot myself
The only other thing more degrading than those two options is paying for a whore that looks like that
whores are fine.
whores are the only honest women. They tell you the price up front.
I got some hot footage for those who’d pick choice b):
Don’t forget the kleenex, dawg.
So what’s the etiquette, do I take some flowers to the whorehouse today or not?
you pay for (a) with money.
you pay for (b) with your soul.
yeah, but (a) pays with her soul … although she gets money for this.
[heartiste: most sex workers enter the field voluntarily. the narrative to the contrary is simply total bullshit.]
i think it’s better to sleep with (b) because she has nice hair
[i’d hate to see what your definition of bad hair looks like.]
and beautiful eyes
[if there was any doubt that you are not a persistent troll, this comment should dispel it.]
and by loving her you can inspire her to lose weight and stop smoking.
[her problems are far more numerous than fatness and smoking. she needs a DNA enhancement.]
sleeping with a prostitute just causes further damage to her soul.
[if it’s so soul damaging, why do most whores go into it on their own accord and stay with it for years?]
Maya, look at b. Really look at her. Take off your new agey “I’m okay you’re okay” blinders for a minute.
I’d say that woman’s soul is damaged unless she is a Lesbian. If she is a Lesbian, she had that kind of edgy something I could see doing. If she is heterosexual, she utterly and completely hates herself.
The fact that she has pretty hair and pretty eyes, and though most women do have some confidence issues, we’re not all blind, means she has no remotely rational excuse for not caring for herself. It’s not like she’s extremely old or extremely ugly in raw terms, and would be empowered somehow by letting go of socially imposed grooming schedules or something. We’re not all perfect, but most of us care enough to not just let stuff go.
I’m not ashamed to say that even though as a woman I might hit that, if I was male I wouldn’t go near that with someone else’s dick. No way. Bring the hooker.
Nicole, please tell me the only way you would hit that is vigorously with a twelve inch strap on dildo that had been rolled with superglue and finely shreded glass laced with burning acid and poison which will kill her before she ever fucks again!!!
LOL.
At least with (a) you have a choice of which whore.
A. Not because of the whore bit but because you have no other way…
Even though I said b, yeah. Nothing wrong with the occasional whore as long as it’s not because you’re completely incapable of getting sex elsewhere.
cigstache is back! there’s a blast from the past. i think she was origially one of 10 photos featured in a “rank the chicks” post, maybe in late 2008 or early 2009, then became shorthand for fuglies in subsequent posts. thanks for bringing her back on valentines day, Chateau…
oneitis, maurice?
I choose masturbation.
A. I don’t believe I could ever pay for sex, not when there is plenty sex available in which no monetary transaction is required for the deed. If I was a wretched omega, though, I’d probably pay to have my product consumed.
B. My penis will shrivel in flaccid defiance at the sight of such a sorry specimen.
Agreed.
If it’s one of those high-class whores you see in the movies, then obviously a).
Otherwise, could I just let Bobby Brown punch me in the face?
This isn’t even close. At least the poor bastard who pays a pro because he can’t get any doable chick for free shows that he has absolute minimum standards…and at least one functional eye.
Most paid sex is not with pros.
Anyone who’s made a direct cash-for-sex transaction in their life is a pro in my book.
Clarification: I don’t mean to imply the term “pro” equates to them actually being skilled at their chosen trade.
Jeez, keep posting these pictures of late and the chateau will be where boners go to die.
I know tons of guys who are amazing with women who are quite into hookers and escorts. It has nothing to do with “choose one or the other”. Opie and Anthony talk about it all the time, and those guys are millionaires with 10′s.
Sadly I still feel some sort of dirtyness if I was to ever get a hooker. Probably a societal thing,
What a waste of blue eyes. God is cruel sometimes.
I chose mustache chick. You can’t prove someone fucked her, can you?
I mean I chose mustache chick as the worst of the options. Not as in I chose her.
Actually i’d rather do whitney housten than the creature. Bet the thing smells worse too… Iiii will always love yoooou
Choose the whore.
Keep it in the species.
You mean bipedal smelly nasty looking landwhales are not part of our species(modern present day human beings or homo sapiens sapiens). I’m shocked,(Not meant for you,Gorbachev, as I realize you are sane and intelligent like myself but for the insane or retarded people reading this—Hear my SARCASM!!!) shocked I tell you!!! What would our ruling elite with their supporting feminasties and White Knights/Manginas think?
they’re all whores, fellas.
Just because you didn’t put any cash in her hands doesn’t mean you haven’t done business.
Either way you pay. But money is easier to replace than time or dignity.
this is a guy bro. come on.
There’s no way in hell paying for a decent looking whore is more degrading than fucking the comic book guy from the simpsons
Come one, she isn’t that bad looking. I think she has a lovely chin. And it’s the inner beauty that matters.
A snorlax appeared…
Here’s Tiger Woods’ whore, as eyewash for the snorlax:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_it-hnLPVidA/S2vwIhp3f8I/AAAAAAAABpE/n0hs-yQFoYY/s400/phpThumb_generated_thumbnailjpg.jpg
Faced with that dylema, I take a) forever, especially if the girl I’d be paying was a Prepago paisa… In that case, the deal is clear: I have something you want and you have something I want, “trueque” and everyvbody got what they wanted without bullshitting.
However, I think the normal relationships are some sort of the a) case arrangement, where the man pays for sex, and the woman gets pleasure, commitment and the resources from the man. A very profitable contract for one part one very limiting for the other.
But the relationships that the game enables you to enter are relationships (especially the short term ones and the same night lays) where the only benefit for each part involved in the sexual contract is sex. A quid pro quo of sex.
I’ll take option A. You hoitty toitty mother fuckers have “paid” for sex one way or another. If you say you haven’t you probably have no pubes.
Let’s remember that CH wasn’t saying that all men who pay for sex, grinding or massages can’t get it otherwise. That’s not at all what he said but a number of commenters took it that way.
Reading comprehension guys…reading comprehension.
Meanwhile, many of the 11% who clicked on a) may have done so by mistake because the brain would have said “click on the one you’d prefer”. If those could take back their mistake, the collective answer would be mostly unanimous.
Also, it takes a fair amount of cluelessness not to realize that the girls many alphas fuck for free aren’t amateur whores with other men. Often the guys at the clubs get their free lays long after the virgin cashed in for cash at age 16.
The film “Debbie Does Dallas” wasn’t just fantasy. Teens are really like that.
Sorry: are whores for other men
That is very true. Even the ones with so-called alpha boyfriends still whore themselves out.
This is exactly what happened to me.
My line of thinking is very broad, but don’t you TECHNICALLY pay for ALL women? I mean how many girls are going to let you at the goodies without at least a noticeable investment of time, energy, or money? In most non “pay for play relationships”, don’t you usually end up having to sacrifice a healthy combination of all three?
Rather pay a whore that will be better looking than the trailer park mammoth.
Cigstache,
O Light of my Life,
O Fire of my loins
The irony is that sex for money generally costs a lot less than sex for free.
There are very thirsty men in this world and the woman in the photo has certainly been fucked. You have to wonder how much these poor fellows have spent on dates, gifts, children, divore settlements and, of course, the cost of wasted time and emotional turmoil from FUCKING THAT. Guarantee you that sad cases have dropped more on that (and other horrid women) on a fuck by fuck basis than they would if they have visited high class escorts during the same period.
As a guy who has been in an LTR for 16 years, I now understand the allure of hookers. Sometimes, you don’t want the mess and bother of affairs. Ask Elliot Spitzer or other dudes like him; they don’t have trouble attracting pussy, but they don’t want it interfering with their home lives.
From fringe to the Wall Street Journal in, what, three years? Four years? I dunno.
http://online.wsj.com/article/best_of_the_web_today.html
I honestly can’t believe so many of you picked option b. aside from the fact that fugly is clearly a man with a wig on (why would any fugly decide to fix up her hair but not the rest of the package) I’d rather pay for a decent looking whore than sleep with fugly. If you think about it, we all spend money on women one way or another and even then we spend time on them which could be spent on more ways to get money
Jordan Van Sloot, Batman Edition
for option b it just wouldn’t move.
As if more proof Obama’s beta was needed:
http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/02/obamas-valentines-day-advice-114421.html
B is more degrading by far
C’mon, ya judgmental bastids… all bodies are good bodies!