Feed on
Posts
Comments

dvorak asks a straightforward question that will never be answered on NPR,

steve sailer: You know, New York Times, there is this concept called “per capita” that’s useful for thinking about topics like this.

It would be interesting to determine when the media stopped talking about ‘standard of living’ (inherently per capita) and replaced it with ‘the economy’.

SFG provides the Ngram.

“Standard of living” was the guiding concern leading up to the Great Compression — mid-20th Century egalitarian and 90% White America — and was lapped by “the Economy” sometime around 1950, presaging the Great Divergence and 60% White America.

The Economy became the clarion call of the elite when their fellow Americans became ballast holding back the potential heights of the elite’s avarice. “Standard of living” is what we talk about when we actually care about the quality of life of fellow Americans.

Cohencidentally, the media began to idolize “The Economy” when both the media and the economy became the playground of one very small but extraordinarily privileged and powerful minority. You see, “Standard of Living” risks empowering the Cossacks; “The Economy” weakens them with the imported detritus of scab laborers and mercenaries.

This rhetorical and policy switch reminded me that the Corporatocracy is alive and well, and consuming the last bits of America’s carcass. (And, I’m afraid, Trump has no intention nor plan to curb the power of the Corporatocracy.) From Amon Ra,

One of the [special] inventions, corporate personhood, destroyer of nations.

– You elected them to write new laws. They’re letting corporations do it instead. –

”Corporations, special interests wrote bills. Politicians introduced them. 10,000 times”

Here is the link provided by Amon Ra, and which was working as recently as yesterday:

https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2019/04/03/abortion-gun-laws-stand-your-ground-model-bills-conservatives-liberal-corporate-influence-lobbyists/3162173002/

Today, the link is dead.

Deep-sixed.

Memory-holed.

As if it never existed.

I was about to comment on the article, because it was a real eye-opener on the extent to which corporate lobbyists basically dictate policy to Congress. Naturally, these corporate whores get policies which benefit them and not regular Americans. This is why we don’t have a Wall today, and why the Trump Admin is considering, incredulously, cutbacks to the E-Verify program.

But the article was too hot to handle, so TPTB made it disappear.

Self-rule is dead in America.

We are ruled by billionaires.

By fat cats.

By a malevolent tribe.

By deracinated oligarchs.

And they will not allow dissent.

Suppression is the order of the day.

If they keep this up…

well, I’ll leave it at that.

***

FYI Tucker Carlson, rightfully, took Trump to the wood shed in his monologue yesterday.

Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, who in a segment on his show wondered what it might look like if Trump had decided he didn’t want to be president anymore and was taking steps to ensure he didn’t win another term…

In this “hypothetical” scenario, Carlson ran through a number of things Trump could do so that his base would turn on him — all of which line up with actual Trump administration actions or reported proposals. He noted, for example, that if Trump wanted to lose, he could raise gas taxes, something the administration is reportedly considering and an idea that Carlson said is “so mindless and counterproductive there’s literally no way you could get re-elected after doing it.” Later, he told Trump he should definitely “go with the gas tax” if he secretly wants “to retire early” and is “really sick of the job.”

Proposing cuts to Medicare and E-Verify would also be ways Trump could undermine his re-election chances, Carlson argued, as well as continuing “our pointless military intervention in Syria.” These, again, are not hypothetical scenarios at all.

“If the president did all that, the message would be very clear: he has no idea what he ran on in 2016,” Carlson said. “He just wants out.”

Tucker 2020.

***

A Vatican Cardinal has warned the “West will disappear” as a result of mass migration.

“If the West continues in this fatal way, there is a great risk that, due to a lack of birth, it will disappear, invaded by foreigners, just as Rome has been invaded by barbarians,” said Sarah, adding, “My country is predominantly Muslim. I think I know what reality I’m talking about.”

The Cardinal also blamed the European Union for its “desire to globalize the world, ridding it of nations with their distinctive characteristics,” labeling the move “sheer madness”.

“The Brussels Commission thinks only about building a free market in the service of the great financial powers,” he continued. “The European Union no longer protects the peoples within it. It protects the banks.”

Here is a photo of the Cardinal:

Is anyone surprised? Realtalk has ceased being the province of pathologically virtue signaling White elites.

101 Responses to “The Corporatocracy Is Real And It’s Consuming America”

  1. Rick Derris says:

    Francis Arinze should be the current Pope, not the current Marxist Pontiff.

    Liked by 3 people

    • I’m telling you, N!g-N0gs don’t carry around all that baggage of Pathological Altruism and Muh Virtue Snivelling.

      There is no freedom quite like the freedom which comes with ceasing to care.

      Liked by 4 people

      • pelayo1683 says:

        It’s caring about the One Needful Thing. Which makes all else so very small in comparison.

        Not caring about anything is nihilism.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Aristarchus says:

        Unholy shit, Captain Oblivion now openly glorifies TNB and the nigger lifestyle! Why bother explaining this in a 1500-word essay?

        I just so happened to have that one handy, already set up for text. I’ll make better ones later. (Plural.)

        P.S., Cap’n, howzat for memes? Am I s1@ying the HB9 p00nt@ng yet? LOLOLOLZ.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “Am I s1@ying the HB9 p00nt@ng yet?”

        Seal didn’t care that he took a giant diarrhea all over the Klum family bl00dlines. The n!gger simply squatted and took the diarrhea and then moved on.

        Probably didn’t even bother to wipe his own a$$.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        What we need are moar White men who behave like that.

        But no, we White men can’t seem to behave like that.

        Instead, we have to obsess about muh Roth IRA & muh 401K & muh German-Engineered Luxury SUV & muh mountain cabin & muh beach cottage & muh skrewl districts & muh property values & muh golf club & muh tennis club & muh Chr!st Cuck church congregation & muh alumni Homecoming Game at the alma mater & which j00 can I bribe to get the kids into the alma mater & muh Credit Rating & muh Scr0tial Security & muh Medicunt & muh Pathological Altruism & muh Virtue Snivelling & muh muh muh muh muh muh ME!!!!!

        Meanwhile, the N!g-N0gs, who don’t give a flying phuck about anything, continue to squirt that giant diarrhea all over our bl00dlines.

        Liked by 1 person

      • KingofQueans says:

        Capn

        Wh1te men only behave @ngry like that when someone else puts their bunz in his w1fez wh1te 0 ven.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I’m not even talking about anger, man.

        I’d be happy simply talking about putting the dadgum bun in the 0ven in the first place.

        I can’t knock up that chick because she went to State College instead of Private College.

        I can’t knock up that chick because she’s a Methodist & I’m a Baptist.

        I can’t knock up that chick because I work for Target & she works for Walmart.

        I can’t knock up that chick because she has freckles [even though I love redheads].

        I can’t knock up that chick because she’s still at least ten pounds overweight.

        I can’t knock up that chick because she’s only got C-cups, and muh B@by Mama has to have D-Cups.

        I can’t knock up that chick because she’s got pointy elbows.

        Then ten years later…

        We can’t have any moar kids because our Prius has maxed out its childseat capacity.

        We can’t have any moar kids because our local zoning ordinances put a limit on tenants in a single family dwelling.

        We can’t have any moar kids because our we could never afford to pay for all of them to pay to attend the Alma Mater.

        We can’t have any moar kids because muh Global Warming Hoax and #MeToo Mother Gaia.

        I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah I Can’t We Can’t blah blah blah blah blah blah blah…

        tl;dr = White people are CARING themselves straight into extinction.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sorcerygod says:

        From a white billionaire down to the lowest-breed subhuman imaginable . . . how the angels have descended.

        Perhaps in another life she’ll make love to bacteria or amoebas and form a tidy little colony of her own. Or maybe a virus. An African one. Ebola.

        Like

      • Sorcerygod says:

        What’s the point of attacking Captain Obvious when he’s basically right?

        White population levels are failing to reach even replacement level. Across the Eurasian and New Worlds, there’s a desperate shortage of tens of millions. In the meantime, the Swarth World is multiplying massively. The only good sign is that this has happened in the past, with whites included. The population bounds up over one, one and a half generations and then it settles down, as if all the moms said, Whoaah enough of thasss shit. And then it goes away, the baby booming.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        Captain Oblivious: lulz. I hit you bullseye with a funny graphic, and you respond with some jewtube nigger-worship followed by repeated walls of text—really, illegible walls of disorganized, rambling drivel. That reeks of Asperger’s.

        You’re no memester. You are only capable of copying shit that others made, and spamming it 1000 times. —That, and obsessive-compulsive unhinged ranting that reeks of autism. No wonder you love calling others “spergs”.

        I can kick out original, pic-worth-a-thousand-word memes all day, all night—when I want to.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        Captain Oblivion:

        [long, rambling, spergtarded-obsessive rationalizations of TNB, and glorifications of nigger superiority, etc., ad nauseam]

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Meanwhile, you have zero White ch!ldren, whereas some talentless hack n!gger waltzed into town and knocked up the moast beautiful White woman in the world with three diarrhea-skinned ab0minations.

        And it never even crossed her mind to sneak off to Planned Murd3rh00d so as to snuff out those ab0minations.

        She pushed out all three of ’em – live deliveries of friggin sauronic orcs emerging from [what should have been] her glorious pink b!rth canal.

        All the empiricals say that insouciance => survival & propagation & thriving.

        Whereas CARING => EXTINCTION.

        If you wanna score the HB9 p00ntang [to the point that it won’t sneak off to Planned Murd3rh00d to snuff out your pr0geny], then you have got to STOP CARING.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        To cut the bullshit, Captain Oblivion, I will ask you here one question: Why have a White race?

        Niggers are superior niggers. Niggers will always be superior as niggers to non-niggers who try to ape niggers. Moreover, I hate niggers. And I hate wiggers even worse than I hate niggers.

        Assuming your fantastically retarded and mendacious premises arguendo: If the only way that Whites can survive is to imitate niggers, then the White race deserves to go extinct—and I will fight to make it extinct. Whites need to die, now!

        The only reason to love and take pride in the White race is that, once upon a time, it was the race that called itself “Aryan”, and deserved that. (It certainly doesn’t deserve it lately. Perhaps it can again someday—niggers never will.)

        Answer the question: What is the fucking purpose of the White race?

        (Whereas this question is purely rhetorical: Besides praising Stalin, overtly condemning rationality, telling a race dying of mass apathy to STOP CARING, and telling White men that the niggers are their rôle models, do you have any other bright ideas—“Captain Obvious”? Rhetorical—I don’t want to know—I DON’T CARE.)

        Like

  2. the link is working here

    Like

    • Aristarchus says:

      Oops. I didn’t bother checking CH’s assertion of memory-holedness before I ran to the archives.

      Like

    • DR Smith says:

      Yup, confirm link is working as of this comment. If you have an iPhone, you can save a copy of it as a PDF is your Book application….should be first thing anyone does when research on internet, as the Deep State is powerful and can make anything or anyone disappear

      Like

    • Akuma says:

      Theres a solution to all the declining white birth rates. Its as simple as banning the white women from the work force and enforcing strict zero tolerance policies for drug usage for the other employees. This means white men will have more ample resources to provide for the white female. It also means it’ll be easier to er***cate the n***** that try and help the unemployed white women. If only Trump had the balls to enact a policy like this or even come out and say it.

      Like

  3. Captain Obvious says:

    In re USA Today’s “Model Bills” investigative piece – I was listening to cuckservative talk radio the other day, and the bottom-of-the-hour newz came on, and the news reader talked about how a bill had been introduced in the State House to create an Ho1ohaux Commission which would oversee a mandatory Ho1ohaux Curriculum in K-12 gubmint schulz.

    Just hearing those words, being read over the air, felt like a dagger through the heart.

    Sh!t’s starting to get real.

    I hope & pray the Normie Cucks are waking up to Globohomo’s arrogance.

    Like

    • baked georgia says:

      the anti-bds laws are a good example of something that came out of nowhere and completely unconstitutional that is now law is several states

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Just as soon as [The Special People] got enough Uranium out of Sud Afrikkka for Israel to go nukular, [The Special People] immediately turned around and st@bbed their former Afrikkkaner “allies” in the back and started the sanctions movement against Sud Afrikkka.

        Liked by 2 people

  4. Roy says:

    Tfw a Nigger is smarter and defends Europe more than the top leadership of the world’s largest Christian sect.

    Honk honk

    Liked by 1 person

    • damnd says:

      he’s just trash talking muslims, something that whites are too afraid to do since a long time ago. reality is that africans can’t defend europe, nor do they have any interest in doing so. it’s up to europeans, and they alone, to save themselves.

      Like

    • JOSEPH ANGEL says:

      Methinks that this negro cardinal was born/raised in Africa, joined the RC Church, liked the civilization that the Church and the West created, really likes/loves the beauty and splendor of being a Cardinal in Vatican City/Rome/Europe, and he does not want his beautiful sinecure to fall to the depths of deepest/darkest/blood-thirsty/savage Africa or Islam. IOW, this particular negro is a bit above average from his winter-weather I.Q. African brothers/Muslim cousins. He gots it good in Whitey-Land.

      Like

    • X says:

      It’s interesting that today, you can assume with almost 100% certainty that a white Ivy League-educated shitlib is lying — and that you have a better probability of getting the unvarnished truth from a based, intelligent black who is probably on the far right tail of the black bell curve and knows a thing or two about his fellow blacks.

      Clarence Thomas and Thomas Sowell come instantly to mind…

      Like

  5. Aristarchus says:

    Today, the link is dead.

    Deep-sixed.

    Memory-holed.

    As if it never existed.

    https://web.archive.org/web/20190405143215/https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2019/04/03/abortion-gun-laws-stand-your-ground-model-bills-conservatives-liberal-corporate-influence-lobbyists/3162173002/

    Deep Blue: You’re welcome.

    (I have not yet read the article, so I can’t comment.)

    Like

    • Aristarchus says:

      Backup archive, from which you can easily d/l a ZIP file:

      https://archive.is/xDFte

      (Note: archive dot is snapshots of this article attempted by others directly are empty redirects—too late? I hereby provide a snapshot of the archive dot org copy, that I just took myself. Not included in my OP to try to avoid m0d.)

      Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        Note to Internet newbies: This is why it’s a bad idea to post things on the Internet that you may wish to someday forget. “As if it never existed.” Heheh.

        Like

  6. Robert Pinkerton says:

    One of Vilfredo Pareto’s axioms in his The Mind and Society is that the democratic republic is the (metaphorical, “as-if”) precursor of the plutocratic oligarchy. It would seem that the metamorphosis is complete, or almost so.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      I just read through Pareto’s Wiki.

      Dude was a profound genius.

      I gotta read some of his sh!znat.

      Like

  7. vfm7916 says:

    Link is working atm.

    Like

  8. JOSEPH ANGEL says:

    The (((Corporatocracy)))– simple fix.

    Like

  9. Passerby says:

    Can you muricans tell me why are murican women trying so hard to sound like men? Why are they trying to get their tone of voice so low? Are they so jealous and envious of men so they want to be more like men?

    it sounds ugly.

    Seriously, these attemps to copy men only reveal insecurity and inferiority complexes: “Women suck and men rock, therefore we should try to be more like men. Femininity is a sing of inferiority”.

    Your WWE became corrupted too, now we’v got a new WWE woman star with a moto “I’m the man”. Lolz

    Now listen to this russian voice and how femininity sounds.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. cortesar says:

    Ann calls out jews, directly

    “And now we Jews, so worried that Minnesota might become the Frozen Fourth Reich if left in the hands of evil whites, have created for ourselves a good old-fashioned golem in Ilhan Omar.” https://t.co/6QJ0nY4XAn

    — Ann Coulter (@AnnCoulter) April 5, 2019

    Like

    • cortesar says:

      a correction
      the cited words are from (((david cole))) in taki mag
      ann retweeted them

      from article

      “What is Congressmuslim Ilhan Omar if not a golem? For decades, leftist Jews have been the biggest boosters of flooding the West with Third World immigrants. “Hey, here’s a plan—let’s dump a hundred thousand Somalis in the whitest parts of the U.S. That’ll save us from Fargo Hitler!” Inundating the West with nonwhite immigrants is seen by Jews as an insurance policy against “white supremacy.” The idea is that these immigrants will act as a wedge, diluting “white power” while remaining small enough in numbers to be manageable”
      …………………
      Jews: “Oy vey! Omar’s criticism of Israel is anti-Semitic!”
      Omar: “Inshallah! Your criticism of my criticism of Israel is Islamophobic!”
      Jews: “Your criticism of our criticism of your criticism of Israel is anti-Jewish!”
      Omar: “Your criticism of my criticism of your criticism of my criticism of Israel is anti-Muslim!”
      Jews: “Your criticism of our criticism of your criticism of our criticism of your criticism of Israel will lead to mass shootings of Jews like what happened in Pittsboig!”
      Omar: “Your criticism of my criticism of your criticism of my criticism of your criticism of my criticism of Israel will lead to mass shootings of Muslims like what happened in New Zealand!

      Like

    • Stifler says:

      Tucker/Coulter or Tucker/Kobach for 2020?

      (I don’t know if Kobach is an israhell firster, but he should’ve been the VP.)

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Not really “calling out da jooz”… she’s just givin’ LEFTIST jews a bit of a neener-neener about their paranoia that leads them to support those who eventually bite the hand that feed, namely “OUR REAL ENEMY”, the muzzies, now personified by this n1gger congresswoman.

      Better than nuthin’, I suppose… but it seems there’s always that LEFTIST thrown in with capital letters and “jews” as an afterthought… as if all those OTHER jooz, center and right (ha!) are actually good friends of us goyim.

      Even though Ann has been somewhat marginalized, she’s still allowed to have a megaphone, so take that into consideration.

      Like

      • cortesar says:

        never good enough for you
        had you paid attention you would have realized that all including what is tweeted is written by (((david cole))) as I clearly indicated in my second post
        coulter though not exactly msm is as close to it as possible and her tweeting the words that explicitly accuse jews of being behind massive turd world immigration is a significant push of the overtone window in that respect
        I am pretty sure that you have not in your life time in front your acquaintances or at some public space ever come close to naming jew as she did today
        think about that before belittling ann’s step

        Liked by 2 people

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Ann shifted the window subtly by having her followers read that article, written by a pretty famous Jew to those of us in-the-know, who (1) openly acknowledges that the Jews are behind the policies leading to turd world immigration, (2) points out how the Muslims have learned very well to play the bogus ‘victim’ card against gullible, naive Whites, as the Jews have done for the past 70+ years, to get more submission from the sheep, and (3) years ago was a leader in investigation the claims about the alleged holocaust, testing the supposed gas chambers at Auschwitz, and so anyone digging a little deeper into him and his history as a “revisionist” will learn many truths about the holocaust myth that have been forced down our throats the past 70 years.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        David Cole is a right wing Jew and Holocaust denier actually. He is a bit of a wanker but I give him that much. I have read many of his articles and he is consistent about criticizing lefty Jews.

        Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Solid article by David Cole, and I am glad to have found a new site for interesting stories (Takimag).

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I am still angry with them over shutting down their comments section. It was a massive betrayal. It was a better place than what this one has become. Some really bright commenters and the types of wankers we have here got banned. I miss it deeply.

        Like

    • Aristarchus says:

      M-d, damn it!

      (((David Cole))) was never anything but an example of how Jews play all sides of the table; and “right-wingers” who lap it up from eagerness for a token Jew on their side only demonstrate how pathetic the “right wing” is.

      I tried to post a link to an article on David Cole’s “Denial is Dead”, with a pertinent excerpt. Taki’s Mag is mentioned offhand. Human m0d, please let that out. Men here need to see the information that they will not get from kosher sources.

      Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        The article that I tried to link is by Hadding Scott, titled “Semi-Revisionism is Dead: Putting David Cole’s ‘Denial is Dead’ into Context” (2017). It is well-written and well-informed. Pending (I hope) some m0d action to let out the kind of information that is heavily (((suppressed))), men are encouraged to search for that article before they make the mistake of trusting that Jew. (But of course, few will make the effort, absent a clickable link.)

        Like

  11. Captain John Charity Spring MA says:

    Based Cardinal!

    Like

  12. elooie says:

    Per CH’s comment about the timing and being in the 1950s. If you look at the world at the end of WW2 most of the industrial world was destroyed except for the United States. We had a huge economic advantage and we also educated every returning GI in how to run a business. We saw the largest boost in standard of living and this cemented the USA as the economic power in the world. Eventually the rest of the world rebuilt and the economic advantages shrunk. We became addicted to this elevated standard of living and bowed to the economic gods instead of returning to our cultural gods that built a civilization so able to thrive.

    Like

  13. Amon Ra says:

    Actually, I believe the link is back. Although, be careful it might have been
    ((( modified ))). Compare it to the internet archive for accuracy.

    https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/news/investigations/2019/04/03/abortion-gun-laws-stand-your-ground-model-bills-conservatives-liberal-corporate-influence-lobbyists/3162173002/

    Like

    • shawn gallagher says:

      This copy-paste legislation BS is not news to me. I read an article in The Atlantic about this around thirty years ago.

      Like

  14. Sorcerygod says:

    The corporations are going to back whatever political movement they think they can control. They believe (rightly?) that they learned the lessons of Nazism slipping loose from their leash, and that now they know how to keep things *S chopping hands vertically and horizontally* under control.

    They certainly have more money and smarter brains than ever before. There isn’t a country-club boy in the bunch, relaxin’ the time aways, not even in the banks. (It used to be “out by 3” in the afternoon for golf, but no more.)

    Capitalism has settled in a predictable, pleasant rhythm of oligopolies. You get 2 or 4 or 8 companies and settle them down to a century or three of unified efforts in dividing the market between them. They don’t compete in the political arena because that would boost up the costs of doing business with the politicians through the lobbyists.

    Like

  15. Amon Ra says:

    Can someone please tell the orange clown to go home. His ((( sh*it ))) is getting tiresome.

    Dump today at the border:

    ” Our country is full, our system is full, we cant take you anymore. Whether its asylum, whether its anything you want, whether its illegal we cant take you anymore. ”

    Dump 1/11/19 :

    H1-B holders in the United States can rest assured that changes are soon coming which will bring both simplicity and certainty to your stay, including a potential path to citizenship. We want to encourage talented and highly skilled people to pursue career options in the U.S.

    Dump 2/15/2019 :

    “Legal immigrants enrich our nation and strengthen our society in countless ways,” the president said. “I want people to come into our country in the largest numbers ever, but they have to come in legally.”

    Like

  16. I know many of you are afraid and/or intellectually overwhelmed by the matrix programming. #metoo I know the simpletons will hate me saying this, but I just can’t categorize all black people as nogrz. Every demographic group has someone who is not an absolute POS. That ain’t no argument against segregation, just against simplistic hate. We are defined by what we love not what we hate, or we don’t have intrinsic value. Humans have intrinsic value.

    Like

    • Ironsides says:

      So move to Africa if you love niggers so much.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Amon Ra says:

      R Doug:

      I personally am not a Huwhyte Supre*macist , on the fact alone, that a supr*eme race wouldn’t allow itself to get in the predicament the huwhyte race is in now. Every group has is intelligent members and leaders. That being said, multicultural, multiracial, multireligous societies have proven to be functional failures, and open to subversion by the ((( ))). Therefore, the only answer is total separation. I dont care how nice, or intelligent, the various peoples of the world are because, for are people to survive, either they leave or we leave. Anything else, will result in blood*shed.

      Like

    • Amon Ra says:

      I’ve noticed that when a huwhyte ally suddenly starts saying kinder , more accepting words about the other. It usually indicates a change in their personal life. You wouldn’t have your eye on a female of a ” browner ” variety would
      you ? 😉

      Like

      • No, AR, total incel. Would I fuck a black chick? If she were hot, could talk right, straightened hair, white bone structure in face, long list for a black chick, but hell, I’m afraid to fuck any chick at this point. I want power during and after the fact, i.e. hand. I would like to fuck all the hot girls of every type, at 9:30 pm at my place, but my terms. Even so, having a mulatto child scares the crap out of me. I want separation and additional quality controls on government/voting/enforcement. Plenty of white to prune in my opinion, and what could be more rewarding? I am not invested in fixing black, but I recognize a tree by its fruits, i.e. the evidence. Skin is not a fruit, only a proxy of fruit, but it is relevant for political policy.

        My stance here is not for anything recently. Evolution is really an individual sport. There are shades of grey. Concessions. It’s the same me. I’ve met black people I like in person, but I don’t want to share power ’cause they vote crap, Obama twice. It’s a cop out to hate everyone in a demographic group as the worst specimen, but that does not mean the bottom line is not the bottom line.

        Subversive politics makes strange bedfellows. Life is always pretty much subversive. It is simplistic to think that there will be some pureness that can be kept still. Mutts are the thoroughbred of real life. We should mind our own business, in space and in time. Life will force priorities. Future generations will get their turn with all the risks. The trick with culture is to make individual self-interest aligned indefinitely, for real not for cuck imagination.

        You are right that a supreme race would not be the ultimate cucks. Supremacy must be earned continually. Entropy despoils. The libtards are earning victory, as useful idiots who will mostly be eliminated, but after they kill us. They will get what they want. They’ve bought into the (((dream))) of a world without Western whitey.

        Join the herd and ‘win’. Or. Think for yourself and lose. You got to be brilliant and lucky to think for yourself and win and not be a herd animal. Life is fucking terrifying. I get why people are religious or complete racists or complete cucks or whatever. Narrative BS is comforting. Cowards want to be sure they are doing it right in a life of limited and flawed understanding. Hardest thing to admit is not knowing. I know nothing but the fact of my ignorance.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “I know nothing but the fact of my ignorance.”

        That’s an excellent foundation upon which to build the character of a righteous sh!tlord baker who spends the rest of his life sliding White bunz into White 0venz.

        Like

      • Libertarian_Pill says:

        “I know nothing but the fact of my ignorance.”
        Isn’t that too humble for an alpha male? Isn’t an alpha male supposed to act as if (or really believe it, if he has a lower IQ) he knows everything and has everything under control? What happened to the unrealistic overconfidence that was so praised around here?

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        >>>>> “he knows everything and has everything under control”

        Jesus H Chr!st, for the sake of G0d Almighty, will you please STOP CARING?

        Only G0d could possibly know & control everything, and Natural Alphas are sufficiently instinctual that they can intuit that it’s insanity for a mortal man to attempt to mock the Divine in such a fashion.

        Natural Alphas just walk around silly little roadblocks like that and head straight for the p00ntang on the other side.

        Because Natural Alphas DO NOT CARE.

        Only spergs waste the entirety of their lives in the middle of the road scratching their heads & trying to figure out how the phuck to disassemble the roadblock.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      It’s been acknowledged ’round chere innumerable times that, yes, everyone has their “good” negro and jew… and that there are obviously (DUH) good and bad, smart and dumb, beautiful and ugly in EVERY race and ethnic group.

      So what’s your point, besides shilling for The Narrative with Alinsky “blind hate” bullshit?

      The reason we generalize, both at the chateau and in just about every other area of life, is that, when it comes to the sanctity of a folk and the viability of a nation, you can’t immediately hedge each and every conversation and/or decision involving realpolitik, because it’s never just about the “good” ones.

      If you accept one, you wind up accepting all, and then the general truism of the character of a race is what counts, not the nobility of any one or two individuals.

      The example has been given, again, innumerable times ’round chere… if you have a hornets nest in your yard, if you’re going to wait around to see which ones WON’T sting you, it’s going to be too late… and the so-called good ones that didn’t sting you will nevertheless NEVER… EVER… side with you against their fellow hornets.

      But let’s have some more poopytalk about “blind hate” next month again… and then the month after that… and then… etc., etc., etc.

      This is why we lose… even among yeggs what’s been here for years, the same pointless conversations and Narrative Support keeps coming through periodically and even the simplest precepts have to keep getting revisited.

      (((shakin’ mah haid)))

      Liked by 1 person

      • Veterans of this blog need not keep coming back to be sure. It is a social life line. You are right in what you say, but face to face you will sometimes be better off cooperating with a black person. You fucks are so preoccupied with what you want vis-a-vis what you can get. What did you take today?

        Like

      • ‘Tis better to return here and repeat debates than to watch the MSM news.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        Out of 5 men replying to “Doug” in this subthread before me, 2 called his dissimulated racial-egalitarian bullshit head-on: Greg Eliot (with some detail) and Ironsides (with a well-aimed one-liner shiv).

        Yes, I am keeping count. WTF, where are all the proud White men?

        Like

      • Reinald Vallejo says:

        And even a few good boomers too.

        Like

    • Aristarchus says:

      A “NOTICE” in re “Doug”

      When I first arrived here, I thought that Doug was an interesting chap. I was nothing but friendly to him. That stopped when he sucker-punched me with a grandiose public “NOTICE” about what a “dangerous fucker” I am. I thereupon presumed he was just a flakey pseudointellectual; and later, I chalked it up to him being a mental defective (per his own statement about himself). But now, I realize that he is pushing a definite agenda—and he must have realized early on that I am indeed “dangerous to it.

      Following is a brief sampling of some of Doug’s statements in this thread, and two other recent threads. Of course, I can provide citations and archives for everything. I would inline hyp3r lnk everything upfront, if that wouldn’t cause assured m0dding.

      Stack up the following with Doug’s persistent patterns of passive-aggressive sneak-attacks, backtalking, distortion, and dissimulating his real opinions under the rubric of a nominal agreement with the Château’s party line.

      1. Pure racial-egalitarian propaganda:

      I know the simpletons will hate me saying this, but I just can’t categorize all black people as nogrz…. [two classic methods: peremptory ridicule, and dissimulating disagreement through minimization and feigned quasi-agreement. —A.]

      Humans have intrinsic value. [!!! —A.]

      2. Miscegenationist propaganda:

      Would I fuck a black chick? If she were hot, could talk right, straightened hair, white bone structure in face [!!! —A.], long list for a black chick…

      Skin is not a fruit, only a proxy of fruit… [N.b. misdirecting focus to skin alone; I have seen this from him before. Here, it is subtly amplified by an order of magnitude through his supposition that a “black chick” could (randomly? by independent mutation?) have a “white bone structure in face [sic]”. —A.]

      3. No comment needed round chere, I should hope wish:

      Neo-nazis are all emotion and no sense. No excuse to be a Nazi or Communist today with all the clear history and analysis we have.

      Oh, muh Six Gorillion! Eebul Nazis, just like the Communists.

      4. …and:

      I guess the success of the early Athenians, the early Romans with their Stone Tables, the Dutch Republic, the British Constitutional Monarchy, the early American Republic… [N.b. a cunning conflation of very different political systems —A.]

      Get over it. Entropy happens. [I have heard this style of argumentation many times from Jews, in the “we will replace you” sense. —A.]

      Plenty of you neo-nazis are not Aryan the why Hitler regarded it and he would have killed you. [Where, oh where, have I heard this before? Whereas in reality, Hitler never killed even one individual solely for being “not Aryan”. —A.]

      5. Bonus: Poisoning the well with literal rape-apologetics, similar to what I have also seen from “Doug” elsewhere before:

      They [women] want to be raped by the man that can get away with it, which makes it NOT rape. It’s not rape if you can’t get caught bested. [Sarcastic strikethrough in the original. —A.]

      Ja, let’s all make of ourselves the feminist caricature of “toxic masculinity” and “rape culture”! If that were “manly” thinking, then I would be a feminist. (N.b. that nigger-glorifying Stalinist Captain Oblivion promptly agreed with Doug there—just as Oblivion amplifies him here in this thread.)

      Caveat. Whoever he is, and regardless of his mental defect, “Doug” is systematically inserting an agenda via distortion and Trojan-horse tactics.

      I don’t make this call often. The blightwing is full of far too much of knee-jerk “kike!” calls over any disagreement. But upon the foregoing quotes, and related context, I can conclude: Either “Doug” is a Jew, or he has been so molded by whatever (((therapist))) he goes to that he has become behaviorally indistinguishable from one.

      P.S., “Doug”: KILL YOURSELF.

      Like

    • Publius says:

      Gay.

      Like

  17. Burner Prime says:

    Tucker cucked and apologized to Creepy Joe Biden the pedophile. I think they got to him. After hiring extreme left Donna Brazile, Fox and he can’t be relied on or believed. It’s all fake news now.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Now?

      Where ya been? For well over two years now innumerable examples have been given as to FOX being allowed opposition, making right-sounding noises on SOME issues, but firmly within the Narrative on all the rubber-to-road stuff of (((globohomo))) concerns.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Aristarchus says:

        Mr. Eliot:

        For well over two years now innumerable examples have been given as to FOX being allowed opposition

        Well over two years? Fox has been the Zionist War Channel for—well, ever since I first saw it. I knew an Israeli-“American” Jew who started watching FOX News religiously post-9/11. All to gloat over the impending political inevitably that America would proceed to run through the Near East like a bull in a china shop. ‘Nuff said.

        Otherwise, your point is well taken.

        Like

  18. Is it time to vote the loon of the island yet?

    Like

    • Aristarchus says:

      Quit backtalking, you sneaky, passive-aggressive bitch. Say it to my face, and call me out by name so that I am more likely to see it.

      I ignore most of your drivel, so I only noticed this after I had replied to your above race-mixing bullshit—and I only saw that, because I was doing Ctrl-F on “Greg Eliot”. (h/t Mr. Eliot.)

      You really are obsessed with me. You posted a public “NOTICE” against me, at a time when I’d been nothing but friendly to you. You later tried to incite a two-day boycott of CH as a protest against me (!). You’ve replied to my compliments to other men, by warning them that I was “setting [them] up” for a “shiv” because I am “psychologically abusive” (!!). I have probably missed much wackiness on your part, for I do mostly ignore you.

      Now, who is it that most stereotypically uses the tactic of accusing others of his own worst sins?

      Who are you to call anybody a “loon”?

      “‘Reality’” loon, ¡ⓀⒾⓁⓁ ⓎⓄⓊⓇⓈⒺⓁⒻ!

      P.S., sperg, I know that this will really bother you—and amidst a stupid, irrelevant, out-of-the-blue one-liner, such a typo actually does make you look quite foolish: You left one letter F off the word “off”. And now, you can’t put the missing F where it belongs! You really need to K.Y.S. DO. IT.

      Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Why do you fellows waste so much of your (and our) time with all this in-fighting? To the rest of us reading these posts, it is quite boring and bothersome. If someone disagrees with you, or says something you don’t like about you, just do like I an many others do – ignore it. Instead, we readers have to be punished with seemingly endless (“Yuse wanna fight, bitch!”) tit-for-tat battle posts. Well-reasoned challenges to/arguments against what someone says is one thing (and perfectly acceptable, as it adds to the debate), but these constant personal attacks against each other (and not only by you two, for sure) is downright ridiculous. I hope CH starts to ban everyone engaged in it, because it brings shame and bad vibes to this honorable site.

      Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        Johnny Redux: That is a reasonable desire on your part, but I must in turn ask a twofold reasonable question: What should a man do when some lowlife follows him around, calling him insults? (Or in this case, tries to cowardly insult him behind his back—as “Doug” has been doing to me for over a month, now, whilst assiduously avoiding confrontation with me.) —And how should a man respond to the presence of persons who are completely unacceptable company?

        What it sounds like you want, for an “honorable site”, is a heavily moderated forum with account registrations and some form of reputation. Those exist.

        I actually prefer that type of environment—usually. (Most particularly, I would prefer that type of society in real life, offline!) You will note that I disagree civilly where disagreement is civil, and not outside the pale of an honorable society. That includes hereby—in how you addressed me, and in how I here reply.

        But on a site which aptly describes its comments section up-top as a “lunchroom food fight”, two things will occur:

        (1) Cranks, trolls, and sockpuppeteers will freely harass any man whom they sufficiently dislike. It is the usual course of breakdown in any society wherein politeness is not respected, and bad behavior is not autħoritatively policed: The lowest elements will get the upper hand if they are not smacked down. Those with a schoolyard-bully mentality take encouragement from passivity. Can you tell a man not to hit back in such a situation? I sometimes get gutter insults attached to nearly every substantive comment I make on a page! Should I just “ignore it”?

        (2) Expanding on (1), troll control is a subtle art that is necessary to any forum where trolls are not simply banned. For obvious reasons, I will not say too much about this—save to point out that, if you were to spend a fantastic amount of time examining things that you probably ignore, you would notice that, after I have only been here for less than two months, some of the longtime trolls here are afraid of me.

        (3) There will be present some grossly unacceptable characters. There are several regulars here who would be banned on any actively moderated forum in which I would ever partake. As for myself, those are the only ones you ever see me actively pursue with personal attacks—and I do that on principle. Society has collapsed because men don’t draw a line at certain principles. If every man drew a line on no-compromise principles, instead of saying, “yeah, man, whatever”, then we would not now be sitting amidst the ruins of what was Western civilization! I actively criticize men who fail to stand up on these points. I did so above, on this very page: Where are you as to “Doug’s” racial-egalitarian propaganda?

        And yes, it does matter who started it and who is right. That is a matter of principle. I will not suffer moral equivocation, much less false equivalencies. Your statement about “you fellows” is wrong.

        I do ignore many, if not most of the personal attacks on me here, simply because they are not worth my time. For example, last month, I ignored “Doug” for a few weeks while he went around backtalking me and calling me a “loon”. He started that immediately after he had launched a bizarre, unprovoked attack on me that seemed to come out of nowhere; thereto, I had been nothing but friendly toward him. If you suggest that I do something wrong for sticking a shiv in him when I see fit to do so, then you are telling me that I should be a passive, defenseless bitch. Taken under advisement.

        Moreover, subject only to the constraint of how much time I want to devote to the matter, I will absolutely not ignore admitted niggerfuckers, peddlers of nihilist agitprop, and, here apropos, a sly propagandist who has on this very page made dissimulated apologies for miscegenation and racial egalitarianism (!). —And thus, “Doug” is now in all three categories as stated above.

        Now, if you have any constructive suggestions as to how I could engage in intelligent, objective discussions of substantive issues here without being subjected to any unprovoked personal attacks myself, then I should certainly wish to know that could be achieved.

        Like

      • Aristarchus says:

        I must add two more points here:

        — Thoughtful discussion is sometimes almost impossible here. On this very page, I now have “awaiting” m0d attention two long, informative comments on different subjects. Both required substantial time and effort to prepare, including the reduction of concise excerpts I thereby quoted from sources I thereby cited for further reading. On this same page, all of my “personal attacks” went right through. Now, at this particular moment, I find myself a bit unmotivated to do anything but rip a few jerks to pieces.

        A site that wishes to have quality discussion should first and foremost encourage quality discussion. (!)

        (I think that the first-order problem is with (((WP’s))) “antispam” system. Of course, it would flag an awful lot of “right-wing” stuff as “spam”.)

        — I categorically despise rude, crude stereotypical incel phantasies, etc. I sometimes find it amusing to stick a shiv in those. If anybody dislikes that, too bad.

        Like

  19. Winter says:

    https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/world/our-country-is-full-trump-says-migrants-straining-system/ar-BBVF98S?ocid=spartandhp
    Off topic but interesting. Trump back on the border battle, yet my belief just isn’t there anymore.

    “The southern border is nearly 2,000 miles (3,200 kilometers) long and already has about 650 miles (1,050 kilometers) of different types of barriers, including short vehicle barricades and tall steel fences that go up to 30 feet (9 meters) high. Most of the fencing was built during George W. Bush’s administration, and there have been updates and maintenance throughout other administrations.
    Trump has yet to complete any new mileage of fencing or other barriers anywhere on the border, though he declared Friday that at least 400 miles (650 kilometers) of the border barrier would be erected over the next two years. His administration so far has only replaced existing fencing. Construction for that small chunk of fencing cost about $18 million, began in February 2018 and was completed in October. Plans to replace that fence date back to 2009, during President Barack Obama’s tenure.”

    Hmm, not much done in two years and even if 400 miles in done by the next election a 1000 miles will still be open. Pretty crap for a first term as the Great Wall Builder..

    Like

    • Johnny Redux says:

      I tune Trump out now. Don’t believe anything he says (unless it relates to giving something to Israel). He is the boy who cried wolf, and he can go f*ck himself until I actually see him DOING something other than blowing hot air.

      Like

  20. MOAR WHITE PILLS: Mass Exodus of Public Union Fee Payers After High Court Ruling http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3740042/posts

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      “The American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees saw a 98 percent drop from the prior year, leaving 2,200 agency fee payers. The Service Employees International Union lost 94 percent of their agency fee payers, reducing the number of agency fee payers to 5,800.”

      Like

    • Explain this white pill. Life is good?

      Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Why? Because (1) government bodies should not be unionized in the first place, so the quicker they can be bled away the better, and (2) people should not be forced into any such bogus unions. Unions were meant for people doing shitty jobs for, generally, shitty wages, to prevent abuse by management. Government entity unions just steal money and act as political lobbyist for special interests. The same for teachers unions and all the rest of the bullshit, unnecessary, purely political (Leftist) unions out there.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        People were forced to contribute to unions in state governments through automatic pay deductions. This cuts off their sources of funding to a trickle.

        Like

  21. Jack Archer says:

    And now in the end of fair times come very nigh, and behold, all the beauty that was yet on the earth – fragments of unimagined loveliness… now goeth it all up in smoke.

    Like

  22. damnd says:

    motivational video for masculine men. all the comments are in swedish

    Like

  23. Dave2 says:

    Marxists believe that capitalists act for the common interests of the capitalist class. I wish that were true, because we’d be a lot better off than we are now.

    Immigration is beneficial to individual capitalists, who profit from cheap labor, but too much of it ultimately dooms the entire capitalist class, because those immigrants and their children will one day vote to kill all the capitalists and confiscate their capital. A classic tragedy of the commons.

    Like

  24. PA says:

    Morrissey nailed globohomo, even if he was imagining a different kind of apocalypse:

    Hide on the promenade
    Etch a postcard: “How I Dearly Wish I Was Not Here”

    Like

      • cortesar says:

        “In the sunset of dissolution, everything is illuminated by the aura of nostalgia, even the guillotine.”

        ― Milan Kundera, The Unbearable Lightness of Being

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        here is I believe the official video of everyday is like sunday
        the song was meant to depict the boredom of the small british coastal city yet from the perspective of britain of today evokes nostalgia in the sunset of dissolution

        Like

      • CMC says:

        For the MAGA progress report thread: ‘I know it’s over,’ which features that great aside type line, “but it never really began.”

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      Benghazi in Platforms is another gem. Viva Hate was by far the best album of the Smiths even if it wasn’t a Smiths album. Every song on it was the caliber of How Soon is Now.

      Like

  25. honeyko says:

    “…Self-rule is dead in America.
    We are ruled by billionaires.
    By fat cats.
    By a malevolent tribe.
    By deracinated oligarchs….”

    – – –

    None dare call it the Shadow Party. (Infogalactic)

    And that is why you do NOT want to hand them the power to subsume social media into “public utilities” under the control of a newly-minted bureaucracy staffed by MeToos appointed by Trump’s replacement. Your place on the internet* really is the last thing out there, aside from the shirt on your back, that you can truly claim to *own* anymore.

    (* “…A piece of land, my cattle brand, a place to rest my head,
    The feelin’ of a woman’s love are all you really need for livin’…”
    — The Ballad Of The War Wagon, Ed Ames )

    Like

Leave a Reply

Also reachable over Tor: roissyrwpgxawb3etwznvay4eelbws4lkdtr4tt2r7wxb6adq6pajtqd.onion