Feed on
Posts
Comments

This isn’t freshly trod ground for regular Chateau readers, but it bears repeating for the joy of triggering any wayward feminist cunts and their betasoy lackeys who stumble into this outpost of sexy chauvinism: SCIENCE continues amassing a trove of evidence vindicating the real world observation that women get hot n bothered for fun-lovin’ sexist men.

Yes, AWALT. Even feminists uncontrollably splooge for misogynist pigs.

Quite simply, women can’t trust male feminists to come through like men if times get tough. This basic mistrust of the masculinity of male feminists is toxic to female arousal.

Soyboys who cloyingly parrot feminist vagitudes and profess an abiding belief in the equality, sameness, and interchangeability of the sexes leave women emotionally cold, if not intellectually underwhelmed. And in the business of romance, the hindbrain owns the forebrain.

This is why careerist shrikes have such a hard time finding a man. They too want a man who will “provide and protect”, but their economic, occupational, and social success means that a vanishingly small pool of men can fit their bill. So they go alone to their cat graves, bitter and spiteful and leaning in to the lonesome last, tragicomic victims of their own hypergamy that evolved in an environment and sexual market in which women didn’t waste years of prime fertility pursuing the corner office.

You don’t have to beat women over the head with proclamations of their inferiority to bed them, but it helps to implicitly remind them of their vulnerabilities and dependencies through your unapologetic actions and self-entitled words. The ZFG jerkboy hypnotizes women because everything he does and says is the tacit antithesis of male feminism.

***

Cracker adds,

yeah, the fact that [male feminists] CAN actually get a feminist girl this way is the saddest part

they end up getting the crap girl and she makes his life a living hell from then after

Right, there are two ways a man can “get” a girl: expediently (she settles for him b/c she’s ugly or damaged and he’s in her orbit) or passionately (she swoons for him b/c his masculine energy is irresistible).

Men who “get” feminists expediently suffer for their laziness and cowardice. The bitter spiteful femcunt will unload every bubbling resentment she harbors onto one of these unlucky males, who will wind up in a minefield relationship spending most of the time dodging her incoherent rage and appeasing her increasingly lunatic demands, all for a once-every-six-months perfunctory ball-dribbling into the shallow end of her dry hole.

182 Responses to “Women Love Sexist Men, And Here’s Why”

  1. Nads says:

    As Nigel Tufnel was wont to say:

    “What’s wrong with being sexy?”

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      “I’m not having any woman of mine go to work.”

      Liked by 8 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        ^^^N00bies, pay attention to the spl00ge on that femc*nt’s face after Hitchens delivers that line.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

        The interviewer is Australian journalist and television presenter Jennifer Byrne. Just your typical Australian leftist, feminist femtard working for the ABC (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) funded by the Australian Federal Government but specifically “independent” of Government and politics in the Commonwealth.
        In reality, they tend to push a leftist agenda often/regularly going into Full Retard Leftist Mode.

        Liked by 3 people

      • XLoveli Deeper Seksi --> purpleboxx.wordpress.com says:

        Hitchens was an unusual journalist before catching cancer and dying of it.

        Known for his reporting with The Atlantic he also wrote a book blasting Clinton for the ex-president’s “triangulation” policies of kissing ass with Republicans to get what he wanted from his own policy wonk booklet.

        I think Hitchens was actually an independent thinker, ostensibly “Left” but really in a meaningless category all his own. His little line here demonstrates that.

        Liked by 1 person

      • trav777 says:

        some threadjack- Trump just reversed some guidance on AA at colleges…we shall see if this is more than window dressing. Good stuff tho

        Liked by 1 person

      • hans says:

        Yep, an actual feminazi, yet she basically slid of the chair ending up legs in a big V, waiting to get knocked up by THA MAN.

        A free ride just for a fuck?
        Fuck my so called convictions, HELLO SEAMAN!
        -your average feminist.

        Liked by 2 people

      • mmaier2112 says:

        Goddammit, you stupid bitch! WOMEN HATE WORKING!

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Meh, he does a semi-cuck out when pressed by the bish.

        “If women want to work, that’ fine… but they shouldn’t have to.”

        Who the fuck was talking about women forced to work?

        He starts out with the strong “no woman of mine”, but then backpedals when that busted cooze queries him as if what he said defied logic and credibility… and she presses him on it for awhile, even getting a few laughs at his expense with the gambit that that sort of thinking is antediluvian.

        And no, Cap’n, that incredulous smile on the crone’s face was not damp vag syndrome… it was “I can’t even” snarkface.

        Youse yeggs are at the point where you can’t discern winning from losing.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Liked by 2 people

      • Greg Eliot says:

        “I’m thrilled if they want to work, but they shouldn’t have to.”

        Thrilled, eh?

        Fuck youse yeggs and your half-assed champions of masculinity in these insipid videos.

        Quit showing a room full of horse droppings and promising us there’s a pony nearby.

        Like

      • trav777 says:

        so he pedestalized his women too…interesting.

        Dunno where this impulse comes from but it’s malignant.

        Idle women are the devil’s workshop.

        For the entirety of recorded history, women worked…who the eff cooked and cleaned shit? And it was hard, they had to actually clean by hand, cook by hand, sweep by hand, and wash clothes by hand.

        Then men gave them the vacuum, microwaves, gas ovens, electric ovens, dishwashers, and clothes washers and dryers. Which coincided with permanent press clothing that they didn’t even have to iron anymore. Men saved women from ALL the things they’ve had to do for all of history in the span of steam engine -> oil -> electricity…tends of thousands of years of labor wiped out in a century, hell probably less. Electricity changed everything.

        And they promptly found other uses for their sudden glut of free time thinking up stupid shit to agitate and complain about. And they watched TV and voted. Great job, guys!

        Liked by 3 people

      • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

        “” Goddammit, you stupid bitch! WOMEN HATE WORKING! “”

        Not quite.

        Women LOVE working when they are able to get into (enabled into) “interesting” jobs/professions which require a minimum of actual work, minimal talent and make them the envy/poster girls among their female peers.

        Should these jobs pay poorly, you can bet that they will let EVERYONE know about it and blame the evil Patriarchy for “oppressing” them.

        Typically these women come from middle-class families and are essentially spoilt children that are rarely if ever challenged never grow up.

        The “Arts” sector is rife with them.

        Liked by 2 people

    • DA GBFM LZOZOZZOZLZLZLZZL says:

      lzozozozozo

      lzozozozozolz

      Liked by 4 people

      • DA GBFM LZOZOZZOZLZLZLZZL says:

        lzozozozozo

        lzozozozlzlzol

        Liked by 6 people

      • XLoveli Deeper Seksi --> purpleboxx.wordpress.com says:

        But, c’mon, Sean Connery is, like . . . FAMOUS. There’s a world that they live in that exempts them from the need to conform to much of society, If at all anything.

        Connery’s Bond character was built on his own sense of derring-do and suave smirkiness (a “got one over on you” gleefulness, you might say). It was more believable that Connery-Bond would be bagging the beauties than that Roger Moore ever would.

        Next best Bond: Pierce Brosnan. He was smug enough to be believable in the sack with some of them “ladies.”

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well, for my money, that Lazenby fellow set the gold standard.

        :duckface

        Like

    • Everything being posted here is a lie. If any progressive men happen to be reading here, please know that the best way to get a woman to love you is to respect her has an equal and to reject toxic masculine ideology like KKKonservatism.

      And remember; if she doesn’t date you right away “, just be patient and always be there for her. She will eventually see that you are a great catch for believing in feminism while she realizes that the Drunk Uncle supporters are no good for her.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. mendo says:

    I went to a work happy hour last week and I think I started telling tales out of school about stuff like this.

    Good thing, I didn’t get any slaps in the face or sneers the following day, and there was more enthusiasm about me the days following.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Publius says:

    Ultra liberal communist Jew at antiwhite, far left radical communist institution Northwestern, who did not vote for Trump and was among those who were shocked when he won, and who understands nothing of why Trump won, is given platform by (((Fox News))) to tell goyim and Trump that Trump must appoint unknown 44 year old woman to “save” his presidency.

    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/07/03/trump-should-nominate-amy-coney-barrett-to-supreme-court-to-save-his-presidency.html

    Do you understand yet?

    Liked by 1 person

    • Publius says:

      Trump, nominate this MILF who should be home taking care of her children and you’ve lost my support.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Publius says:

        Lolzozozoz, she’s an originalist. Right. That’s an oxymoron from the start. No female lawyer can be an originalist. Is she going to resign one minute after being sworn in?

        The Framers, of course, did not believe women should vote, let alone be Supreme Court justices.

        That was on purpose, not some little oversight that they didn’t pay attention to.

        Liked by 4 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “Originalist” Female Lawyer

        Like

      • Major7 says:

        Publius, I couldn’t possibly agree more.

        A woman will judge with her feels
        Cares more about status
        Doesn’t work as hard: menstruation & bloating
        Doesn’t work as hard: family distractions
        Doesn’t work as hard: she’s a woman
        Wahmen nomination appeases our enemies
        WASP man nomination is a giant middle finger

        Also, her voice sounds like a Valley Girl dwarf on helium. She’s gotten far enough.

        Liked by 4 people

      • oink says:

        ((adjunct professor)) LoL

        i.e.

        low is the wage of poz-mongering

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        ((adjunct professor)) LoL

        And from Chicago, go figger. lzozlzozlzozlzozlzolzozlozl

        The only person an adjunct professor outranks on campus is the janitor.

        Like

    • Publius says:

      She WILL be a communist softy like O’Connor and Souter. That’s (((his))) point, of course. Fuck this idea that we have to appoint an unknown person to avoid the commies attacking her record of having strong conservative views.

      No quarter. We won. Appoint a white Protestant man.

      It is not the job of women to defend the nation. Ask the Framers.

      Also, I called the jews’ focus on this little girl from minute 1.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Joseph2 says:

      She adopted TWO hatian pets

      Like

  4. Nads says:

    Feminist men act the way they do because they think that is a surefire way into a feminist’s pants. Little do they realize what they are getting into, both physically and with any relationship.

    Liked by 2 people

    • mendo says:

      And what doesn’t help is that most of those dolts are taking their cues from movies and TV, which go out of their way to show the effeminate softy numale getting the girl.

      Liked by 4 people

    • Cracker says:

      yeah, the fact that they CAN actually get a feminist girl this way is the saddest part

      they end up getting the crap girl and she makes his life a living hell from then after

      [CH: right, there are two ways a man can “get” a girl: expediently (she settles for him b/c she’s ugly and he’s in her orbit) or passionately (she swoons for him b/c his masculine energy is irresistible)]

      Liked by 4 people

      • clarence boddiker says:

        “there are two ways a man can “get” a girl”

        right…and appealing to her logic and reason through a dry debate about which wave of feminism best applies to impeaching trump is not one of them.

        Like

      • trav777 says:

        yeah…femmy dudes have gfs. Some pretty. The Hogg marchers had some hot chicks with them.

        But these girls are gonna dump them or divorce rape them at some point, it’s inevitable. But you’d be really surprised how stupid women are.

        For example,all this talk of tingles, there’s no goddamned way that any of these so-called men give them a tingle at all. But women are just socially programmed to fuck for sport anyhow that it appears to be how they end up together.

        Liked by 2 people

      • mendo says:

        Silly thing about girls is they’ll date or bf up some guy that totally bores them just so they can say they have a “bf”.

        Liked by 1 person

      • FastEddie says:

        Course the fem-boys get some hot chicks. Why do hot waitresses at upscale establishments bang bartenders, busboys, and other servers when they have access to successful businessmen?

        Because chicks fuck what’s right in front of them.

        No “probing for weakness” or hamster this, hamster that. Consistent exposure. They hang out socially. They bang.

        Chicks are not known for their ability to self-evaluate (though I’ve met a few who can.)

        Glad you’re all my bros.
        FE

        Liked by 7 people

      • Cracker says:

        exactly right FE
        proximity is a key factor
        and the fact that soyboys tell them they are amazing even when they are not, comes into play too
        quality men will have standards. they don’t idoloze them just for having a gash

        doesn’t mean the girls will be happy with that in the long run but when she’s a sloot, a loser, or whatever, it’s easier to settle for attention from the less than ideal man than tp her game so she can get a good one.

        she’ll always pine away for that sexy alpha though

        Liked by 1 person

      • trav777 says:

        FE’s right.

        My experience too seeing young chicks who are hot fucking loser dudes at a hotel a gf of mine works at. Oh she fucked him, oh she fucked him too…rat looking dudes who the story after the bang is she said he was horrible. Yet…these guys are still getting high shelf ass.

        Girls in my “theory” have two basic personality halves- fear and desire for sex/intimacy. If you are close to them, work with them, you get past the fear part and there remains only a chick wanting to be banged. If she’s a “professional” though beware bc she will light you up at HR for it. Blue collar girls are bangs tho.

        Liked by 5 people

      • FakeChecking says:

        There’s a french guy (stéphane édouard on youtube) who theorized the “proximity effect”. I think he calls it the “closed environment” effect or something like that. By that, he means like “you work in the same company and spend some time together professionally” or any kind of such interactions, that are not based on the will to be together, just the circumstances.
        In such environment, the woman probably mistakes the closeness of your “relationship” for some kind of intimacy. I’m not familiar with this guy’s theory, but I’ve seen something like that unfold around me. A lot of relationships started because the people were having a kind of “both of us on a deserted island” effect. These relationships would never had happened if there was at least someone else on the island. And usually, the environment gets opened (like when they see each other outside of this specific environment, or someone new get introduced in it) and the relationship goes to shit.

        I think guys are also like that to some extense (that’s how you get oneitis). For example in high-school, It got fixated on the hottest girl of my class. I thought she was hot. Just happened that when I went out of highschool, I realize she was just ok. I was not judging “universally”, but on what was available right here in my closed environment.

        Women are easily mistaken on this. On both ways actually. First they’ll think the beta feminist of the hour is their “man of my life”, until they are out of their “closed environment” and are able to make a valid comparison. On the other side of the intimacy deficiency spectrum; they’ll take a neg for an intimate intrusion in their real self, because for them it takes intimacy to read people, to the point of believing “we shared something special” when it is all done and forgotten…

        Liked by 4 people

      • Oleaginous Outrager says:

        Even the most clueless femtards also senses that many “male feminists” are the creepiest predators it’s possible to find, but that ol’ hamster spins her wheel endlessly.

        Like

      • trav777 says:

        went out with some chick last night, turned out to be fatter than what I expected but whatever. Better than sitting at home.

        At some point she said, well, “I’M a feminist.” And I said, “yeah but you’re a girl.” And she started to muse on it. Said after that that this was dangerous ground to go into so I said well then don’t and she changed the subject.

        If I see her again bc I’m bored, I’m gonna go onto that ground and I’m gonna start saying shit like “feminism is cute.”

        If any woman probes, wtf, I will be like when things go to shit you have no say. Women only have say so far as men give them say. You tell me we’re at home in bed and you hear a window break downstairs in the middle of the night, you’re gonna go see who it is? Call 911? You mean a man with a gun?

        She did pay for her half the meal and i was more than happy for her to.

        Like

    • clarence boddiker says:

      the sad thing is, and I’m saying it sad because I have male-feminist friends who are lonely and sad and need red pills, that girls of all political stripes are getting in on the know that a lot of male-feminists are fucking creepy.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. […] Women Love Sexist Men, And Here’s Why […]

    Like

  6. JackH says:

    Deep down when times get dangerous, they need the man that yells out, “get out of the way you weak bitch” then rips the throat out of the offender

    Like

  7. LB says:

    Best to think of every woman as a four-year-old girl. She wants to go on “adventures” (daddy, I’m going out into the backyard now) but have daddy there patiently waiting, watching, and ready to jump in and protect. Daddy isn’t condescending or dismissive of her little adventures, he just lovingly pats her on the head as she trots out to play with the puppy or argue for her client in federal court. Both sides, little girl and daddy, know deep down that her adventures are something that daddy can make right if things go awry.

    Liked by 6 people

    • trav777 says:

      yup. full-sized children.

      from 4-44 it’s the same shit, they never grow up until menopause and then who cares anyway?

      Liked by 3 people

    • Tatless & Beardless says:

      It’s funny how they detect weakness in us from miles away, and yet they can happily travel here, there and everywhere (Brazil included) without even worrying about being mugged, shot, r@ped or butchered by local interlopers at any given momen. Maybe men, and particularly higher t conservative men are just as perceptive as women are to weakness in detecting potential enemies and threats.

      Liked by 2 people

      • hans says:

        Actually I believe their shit-dar just happens to work perfectly on men.
        The main purpose is to sniff EACH OTHER out, to keep the herd in line.

        Very handy for your own Thoty offspring too..
        [video src="https://giant.gfycat.com/RichAgonizingHarpyeagle.webm" /]

        Liked by 3 people

      • hans says:

        Meh, that didn´t work.
        Just highlight and right-click to open in new tab.
        Promise it´s worth it. 🙂

        Like

      • mmaier2112 says:

        Buffy and other TV shows taught them that a 95lb girl can beat up any man thrice her body weight with little effort.

        Sadly… I’m not joking.

        Like

      • trav777 says:

        no, they’re just lucky when traveling.

        And life isn’t *that* dangerous even in a dangerous country. Stay out of bad areas. If you don’t you will get robbed and raped.

        Liked by 1 person

  8. ET Jones says:

    Speaking of cat ladies, the whole “migrant children in cages” and “abolish ICE” crisis has vanished from the news media.

    Liked by 1 person

    • mendo says:

      Kennedy retiring had something to do with that.

      Granted, it was going to lose steam anyways (World Cup and 4th of July. . .kekekek) but with the outgoing justice, the shitlibs just realized they’re at the end of their rope.

      Liked by 2 people

      • trav777 says:

        Trump’s immediately conceding to not fight on the low ground also helped.

        He said ok now we put them with their parents. Now the left is screeching about kids in real jails. Oh,, that’s what you wanted, no? NO, we want NO BORDERS. Now you fight on the ground you wanted to fight on.

        This is the real “art of the deal,” how to argue and how to negotiate. You do not win by refusing to concede weak positions…nobody fucking goes all-in on a 2/8 off suit do they? (it’s a poker reference). Folding as well as retreating is all part of valid tactics.

        Hitler lost because of this, btw. He couldn’t do it.

        Liked by 4 people

  9. clarence boddiker says:

    by the feminism…what are the numbers again?

    7% of girls call themselves feminist?

    And then we also go through the soyboy routine of:

    step 1: ackkshually, feminism is just the belief that women should be treated fairly, what do you have against that?

    to

    step 2: all feminists are free bleeding socialists who want to smash the patriarchy because all sex is rape.

    Liked by 2 people

    • hans says:

      Bah, the don´t call themselves feminists, but just because it´s very low status admitting to it.
      Only crazy lesbotrons and professional busybodies do it with glee.

      Yet NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THEM has even the SLIGHTEST problem wallowing in all the FUCKING PRIVILEGE of feminazi western culture.

      Liked by 1 person

  10. Screwtape says:

    “…women can’t trust male feminists…”

    The one thing men have in common with the femcunts. The “this is what feminism looks like” t-shirt males can’t be trusted period.

    As the left continues to turn the screws, the the lack of virtue, character, and moral fortitude of these men is pressed into plain view.

    I have had to distance myself from a handful of these go-girl males.

    Like all tenuous and anxious bonds forged under leftism, they will shatter upon impact with Truth. Which is to say reality. Which is to say the friction of nature, the conflict of power, and the hierarchy of life.

    Those friendships became untenable when stress-tested. Those men are already bankrupt. Just walking liabilities who spread their fiat feelies across their social cirlcles like some pyramid marketer. So feminine, So disgusting.

    They know they are weak, living a lie. They need constant validation. So much so that even their manjaw wives or pegging partners can barrly contain their disdain. Body lamguage usually reveals much.

    Any man that prostrates before the demon who desires to destroy everything it cannot enslave cannot be a true friend of mine. He simply can’t be trusted.

    Liked by 1 person

    • trav777 says:

      just mock them and their manhood.

      Like

    • Glengarry says:

      “When you men get home and face an anti-war protester, look at him in the eyes and shake his hand. Then, wink at his girlfriend because she knows she’s dating a pussy.” Use as applicable.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. Women know in their hibd brains that a man to weak to stand up to them is to weak to protect them.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      That’s certainly the Darwinian summary of sh!t-testing [and Passive Aggressive Personality Disorder] in a nutshell.

      Although the Nietzschean aspects of it are possibly even moar horrifying.

      Like

  12. elooie says:

    About 6 months ago I went out with group of friends. We all had a little too much to drink and one of my buddies is drowning in blue pill white knighthood. One of the girls I had not really ever had a chance to talk to in the past spent most of the evening shooting jabs at each other all night. I considered it playful shit testing being given and taken. My buddy has had a huge crush on her for years but never done anything about it. Him and I end up getting into it after way to many drinks, he says I’m being an asshole and I’m saying we are just fucking around. I dont remember exactly how all of the conversations went down but he apologized the next day for getting angry, and I saw her like 4 days later where she mentioned it was funny and sweet that he did that. We have a good laugh.

    Fast forward to last Thursday, this same group of friends get back together and this girl and I are both giving my friend shit for leaving early and she starts spitting some guilt on him to stay longer and I turn to her and say, wow, that’s some impressive manipulation there. I should stay away from ya. (big smile). She says, yeah, i’m good but I this wouldn’t work on you. You’re an asshole. (Smile) You know the first time we really hung out, you said to me “I’ve seen better, but I’ve also seen worse!” (I had two thoughts, 1 that’s hilarious I wish I would have remembered saying it and why. 2 that was six months ago. I bet the hamster spun overtime with that.

    Looks like we’re probably gonna hang out tomorrow.

    Like

    • “My buddy”

      Part of swallowing the Red Pill is in realizing who are your friends, and who are actually your enemies.

      I feel sorry for your “buddy”, in that you’re about to tap his dream g!rl.

      Presumably it’s too late to Red Pill his @ss and get him to learning Game.

      Because once you tap his dream g!rl, you’re about to become his ex-buddy.

      Welcome to staring into The Abyss.

      Liked by 3 people

      • discocrotch says:

        It’s called tough love. Maybe he’ll swallow the red pill after getting BTFO by his buddy.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        It’s called making an exceedingly difficult decision between:

        A) Bros b4 Hos

        -versus-

        B) Ah, phuck that sh!t, I’m gonna bang that bish’s brains right outta her ears, and d@mn the consequences.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        The big question is whether your Inner Frame is ready to d@mn the consequences.

        Because otherwise the consequences are gonna d@mn you.

        Like

      • wontgetthtough says:

        Nah, it’s ALWAYS bros before hos. If there’s the least bit of bro left (***), then (metaphorically) fuck the ho. An once he’s not a bro, then the question is moot

        (*** point being that a delta amount of bro is better than the epsilon you get out of banging some ho)

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        WGT, I hear you, muh brutha.

        G0d only knows how much p00nt@ng I left on the table ’cause I was trying to leave some for muh bros.

        But, again, part of swallowing the Red Pill is being realistic about who your true friends are versus who your mortal enemies are.

        And there may come a point where if a bro won’t swallow the Red Pill, then you gotta axe yourself whether he’s gonna be aiming a r!fle at you come Antietam.

        These are very, very difficult decisions.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Suppose you had a hypothetical “Bro” who voted for thec*nt in 2016 & who will vote for Fauxcahontas in 2020.

        Swallowing the Red Pill & re-working your Inner Frame & going to That Dark Place & pondering the moast horrifying Truths about Reality means [among other things] reconciling yourself with the fact that that hypothetical “Bro” is actually an enemy pointing a r!fle at you.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Mitt Romney: ‘Too early’ to say if I’ll support Trump in 2020 http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3667666/posts

        Like

  13. Libertardian says:

    Yep, time to fire Sessions.

    Breitbart: ‘The Department of Justice (DOJ) revealed a plea deal Tuesday to Imran Awan — former IT staffer for top House Democrats — which states the federal government found “no evidence” that Awan “violated federal law with respect to House computer systems.”

    The DOJ’s offer allows Awan to plead guilty to making a false statement on a loan or credit application; a violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1014. Although the crime carries a maximum sentence of 30 years imprisonment and a fine possibly exceeding $1,000,000 with restitution and interest penalties, the DOJ estimates a prison sentence of between zero and six months and a fine between $500 and $9,500 in the event of Awan’s acceptance of its terms.

    The offer includes dismissal of all charges against Awan’s wife, Hina Alvi, listed in an August-issued indictment. It expires at the end of the day.’

    Like

    • Libertardian says:

      From another article: ‘Estimates are that Awan and his family received more than $4 million from House Democrats since 2009.’

      Nice job if you can get it! American STEM graduates aren’t invited, of course.

      Liked by 1 person

    • blert says:

      Awan had the judge in his corner… a life long Democrat.

      In such a situation, Session was largely powerless once Awan got into her court.

      Awan had the Democrats by the screws, of course.

      He was, and remains, a NOC Pakistani agent, of which he has bragged more than once.

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      it just means he’s agreed to testify against bigger fish.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Kyo says:

      “The offer includes dismissal of all charges against Awan’s wife, Hina Alvi”

      As usual, the woman gets off scott free.

      Like

  14. bolg says:

    chauvinistic pigism, lol. toxism!

    Like

  15. spiralina says:

    https://jezebel.com/1827317830

    The comments on this one are pretty sad.

    Like

    • Libertardian says:

      ‘The popular wisdom is that a growing number of women are freezing their eggs because they are canny careerists [lol] who want to climb the professional ladder before having a b4by. It’s a fair enough guess, I suppose, given how shoddily we treat working p4rents [lolz], and moms especially [lolzlz]. But a new study suggests that the real issue driving the egg-freezing phenomenon is, according to researchers, “a lack of stable partnerships with men committed to m4rriage and p4renting.”

      Researchers surveyed women seeking egg-freezing services at more than half a dozen fertility clinics in the United States and Israel. Marcia Inhorn, an anthropologist from Yale University, explained in a press release, “Most of the women had already pursued and completed their educational and career goals, but by their late thirties had been unable to find a lasting reproductive relationship with a stable partner.” [lolzlzlz]’

      One soon to be banned visitor from CH says: ‘It’s almost like we had a sexual revolution that gave us the freedom to avoid the traditional expectation of m4rriage and k1ds if we wanted, and men also got that freedom? I’ve watched this site celebrate remaining ch1ldfree, having casual sex, multiple partners etc. for women for years, but when men do the same they suck and are manbabies who are “scared” of commitment. They’re just exercising the same freedom of choice we have, on a longer clock, because they don’t have fungible eggs. Maybe I’ll lose my feminist card for this but it seems like an odd double standard.’

      Liked by 2 people

      • spiralina says:

        Yeah, it seems like even some of the self proclaimed feminists are balking at the blatant doublethink on display here. Women who choose to remain childfree and ride the carousel are brave and independent, while men who do the exact same thing are “man-babies” who refuse to grow up. That and all the comments from lonely 40-something women who froze their eggs and still can’t find a good man are just depressing…

        Liked by 1 person

      • guest says:

        In my current shitlib city the online dating apps are full of post wall women in their 30s and 40s looking for commitment. Unsurprisingly very few of them seem worth any sort of commitment from a man with options. You fucked around too long, bitches.

        Liked by 1 person

      • mmaier2112 says:

        esp. if they’ve been previously divorce-raped…

        Women are downright evil.

        Liked by 1 person

  16. Publius says:

    Another Jew killed its shiksa.

    https://people.com/crime/dad-allegedly-beat-wife-hammer-in-sleep-told-son-look-away/

    (((They))) really are just high functioning niggers.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      (((They)))’re psychopaths.

      Until you come to terms with that, you can’t understand the (((YKWish))) psyche.

      Like

      • Jay in DC says:

        Yes they are, but they are generally filled with cowardice to go along with their avarice. I’m actually surprised by this story. A more typical scenario would be him hiring Tyrone to make it look like a crime or simply her having an “accident”.

        Either way, she sounded like a russkie import bride if you check the name and was banging some other dude on the side. She was no fuckin’ angel, they deserved each other.

        Like

    • hans says:

      High functioning indeed. Their verbal IQ seems to be actually superior.
      In other words, they can bullshit you like NOBODY ELSE ON THE PLANET.
      This also includes Math, in my opinion.
      Jew Math bullshitting (see Einstein) has been the single biggest factor in holding humanity back.

      A good Jew engineer, inventor?
      *crickets

      Like

    • Amasius says:

      Recommended reading: Chapter III of T.E. Lawrence’s “Seven Pillars of Wisdom” in which he reveals the nature of the Semite with remarkable insight.

      http://www.limpidsoft.com/small/sevenpillars.pdf

      Jews are just bookish Bedouins. Nothing is essentially different between them and the wildest of arab savages.

      Like

  17. Off topic.
    The latest Joe Rogan podcast has Jordan Peterson back on.
    Some great points made.

    Like

    • Dread Forman says:

      Who has three and a half hours to burn listening to some pothead gatekeeper and a spineless chickenshit?

      Liked by 4 people

      • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

        You’re obviously too busy being a little fag,

        Like

      • HungarianPatriot says:

        Naw Mustard the f@g is you. Posting JBP clips round here… gtfoh with that bs lol

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        All I remember from a Peterson clip that was posted as some sort of victory debate ’round chere some months ago was Peterson saying he schooled women in how to be more assertive so as to narrow the “pay gap”.

        The irony thing was, some yegg posted the video debate as Peterson “destroying” some shitlib princess about how the pay gap was false…

        … sure, he shot down the current misinformation on several reasons for the gap, but his summary stance was that the pay gap was a bad thing, and women should be more assertive in order to narrow one of the main reasons.

        The manosphere is so starved for champions that we take defeat and call it victory, merely because a few jabs were landed.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Liked by 1 person

      • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

        Peterson has his blind spots and errs on the side of using “minimal necessary force” in his arguments.
        His style is such that he is able to engage with the masses of “sheeple” who are “on the fence” or ignorant regarding the leftist agenda that has dominated the West over the last 50 or so years.
        To dismiss him outright is to throw out the proverbial baby out with the bathwater.
        Is the world a better place as a result of his work?
        I believe it is.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Dude… this isn’t an instance of handling the masses with kid gloves, or feeding them milk until they’re ready for meat in due season…

        … this is a question of bolstering the usual (((MSM))) narrative at heart, regardless of a few “yeah, but” jabs on the side.

        It’s the same thing as saying, for example, “Leftists are the REAL racists!” (i.e., racist remains a shaming language weapon, and you’re actually supporting The Narrative rather than combating it effectively).

        That sort of weak broth is the oldest gambit in the book, to make things appear as if there is “opposition”, when in face, it’s merely allowed opposition and serves, at best, to just allow some steam to be blown off and the public to be fooled into thinking there’s “fair and balanced” coverage.

        What part of his “I coach women in assertiveness because the pay gap is a bad thing” or that other guy’s “I’m THRILLED if women want to work” do you NOT understand?

        That this has to keep being explained, especially on an alleged red pill haven, is WHY… WE… LOSE.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Liked by 1 person

      • cortesar says:

        “The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history.”

        ― George Orwell pic.twitter.com/Eijjn63B4B

        — Battle Beagle 🇺🇸 🇬🇧 (@HarmlessYardDog) July 4, 2018

        Liked by 1 person

      • cortesar says:

        Is the world a better place as a result of his work?
        ————————————————————————————–
        lolzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
        are you a disciple of dumbya?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

        Perhaps I am being naively optimistic when it comes to Peterson.
        Time will tell.
        What is to play out in the West (and elsewhere) in the next few decades could (and probably will) easily turn into an atomised dystopia that no one can fully predict.
        There are always unintended consequences and we do live in a Universe that is ruled by Irony.
        At least in the U.S. you have the right to bear arms, should things get ugly.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        “Unearned identify with glories of the past”?

        If that’s Peterson spewing that agitprop line, much like Obama did, then I rest my case and REALLY (((shake mah haid)))

        How much MORE of a cuck could one be when he throws that sort of Alinsky gambit in the face of White folks?

        And what makes it all the more galling is that you NEVER hear them mention such a thing during Black History Month, “Say It Loud, I’m Black And Proud” and muh Wakanda fake history is trumpeted from any and all (((MSM))), in the attempt to bolster negro revancist feelings against YT.

        Youse yeggs do what you want, but anyone bringing up Peterson ’round chere might as well go collect 30 pieces of silver from his paymaster.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Jonathan Castle says:

      I’m with you Mustard.

      When you’re fighting a winner-takes-all war with Leftist Globalist Totalitarians, enforcing rigid ideological requirements on would-be allies is self defeating.

      Jordan stands up for freedom of speech, freedom of conscience and logic. Those are important things. He is an ally.

      To be effective where he is, he has to pay homage to some feminist tropes. BUT never make an enemy out of an ally.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Youse yeggs are obtuse, and this is why we lose.

        There are ways of combating the poz with skilled rhetoric and “velvet gloves over an iron fist” manner.

        But when your bottom line is support of The Narrative, which you certainly DON’T have to mouth to be “effective”, you’re doing nothing but whistling past the graveyard where the funeral of the West is being prepared.

        That this has to be explained, time and again, is why you clowns are like an elementary school full of brats who can’t pay attention to, nor comprehend, even the most rudimentary of concepts.

        “Freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, logic”, oh my, how noble the ideals?

        How have they been working out for ya lately, White man?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        And this isn’t so much of “making an enemy of an ally”…

        It’s about discerning who the REAL allies are, and correcting the misconceptions of those who would be true allies.

        And if said ally will not take correction, but continue to mouth comfort in aid and abetting to the foe, well…

        It takes awhile to prove a man at times. Anyone “coaching women to be assertive” and “thrilled to have them in the workplace” had better check his premises, if he’s to be an ally of ours.

        Refusal to do so just stamps him for what he’s always been all along… someone who’s pulled the wool over the eyes of the sheep who have long been awaiting a righteous shepherd.

        Like

      • Jonathan Castle says:

        Well, the battle has been raging, in earnest, for over two years. Before that, the Left has been running wild, unapposed for generations.

        Now blood (metaphorical mostly but sometimes real ala Scalese & Rand Paul) is flowing on the battlefield – and you throw the flag on a guy on your own side because you don’t like his shirt color.

        You are the only one that meets your standards. As a strategy, that’s prideful and stupid.

        Like

      • Jonathan Castle says:

        You are right to look at many self-described allies circumspectly though.

        There are many plants who will deploy (decloak from our perspective) when it suits their godless, globalist, neocon agenda.

        Keep them at arms length. Use them for whatever good they might do. And drop them when they decloak.

        Trump did this with economic advisor Cohn.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        He’s Canadian. He has to talk that way to keep an audience.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        and you throw the flag on a guy on your own side because you don’t like his shirt color.

        Tell us not to be proud of our heritage is more than the color of his shirt, buddy boy…

        … he’s shit his pants, as far as I’m concerned.

        And if you or any other of these fair weather chow hounds things THAT sort of thing “needs to be said” to have an audience, then just sell that “don’t worry, boys, it’s just subterfuge” to someone else, ’cause I ain’t buying… all I’m doing is adding yet another page to that ever-growing tome This Is Why We Lose.

        Like

  18. Mr. Roboto says:

    The most common way an Alpha becomes a beta after entering a relationship is a strategy I call “Beta by a 1000 concessions”, it starts off small like “please put your socks in the hamper” and ends with “Go vegan with me”, “Let’s have an open relationship” and “Wear a pussy hat”

    — Black Label Logic (@Blacklabellogic) June 30, 2018

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      ^^^The Hamster is constantly sniffing for Weakness.

      IT NEVER ENDS.

      B!tch can be lying there in that hospital bed, dying of friggin Stage 5 Breast Cancer, and she’ll still be sh!t-testing at your weak points.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Diversity Is Good says:

      Compliance testing from a woman is just another shit test.
      It’s easy to forget. Too easy to forget that.

      Like

  19. Mean Mr. Mustard says:

    Like

  20. Mean Mr. Mustard says:

    Like

  21. Mean Mr. Mustard says:

    Sheep Logic.

    Sheep are evolved to have a specific type of intelligence which has the following hallmarks.

    1) Enormous capacity for other-regarding behaviors. Sheep are unbelievably sensitive to what other sheep are doing and their emotional states. If another sheep is happy — i.e., it’s found a good source of food, which is the only thing that makes a sheep happy — then every other sheep in the flock is filled with jealousy (there’s really no other word for it) and will move in on that good thing. If another sheep is alarmed — which can be from almost anything, as bravery is not exactly a trait that tends to be naturally selected in a prey species — then every other sheep in the flock is immediately aware of what’s going on. Sometimes that means that they get alarmed, too. As often, though, it’s just an opportunity to keep going with your own grazing without worrying about the alarmed sheep bumping into your happy place.

    2)Zero altruism and overwhelming selfishness. The most popular misconception about sheep is that they are obedient followers. It’s true that they’re not leaders. It’s true that they are incredibly sensitive to other sheep. But it’s also true that they are the most selfish mammal I’ve ever encountered. They don’t lead other sheep or form leadership structures like a pack because they don’t care about other sheep. Every sheep lives in a universe of One, which makes them just about the most non-obedient creature around.

    3) The determination to pursue any behavior that meets Hallmark #1 and #2 to absurd ends, even unto death. My worst sheep suicide story? The first year we kept sheep, we thought it would make sense to set up a hay net in their pen, which keeps the hay off the ground and lets the sheep feed themselves by pulling hay through the very loose loops of the net. Turned out, though, that the loops were so loose that a determined sheep could put her entire head inside the net, and if one sheep could do that, then two sheep could do that. And given how the hay net was hung and how these sheep were sensing each other, they started to move clockwise in unison, each trying to get an advantage over the other, still with their heads stuck in the net. At which point the net starts to tighten. And tighten. And tighten. My daughter found them the next morning, having strangled each other to death, unable to stop gorging themselves or seeking an advantage from the behavior of others. The other sheep were crowded around, stepping around the dead bodies, pulling hay for themselves out of the net. That was a bad day.

    from: http://www.epsilontheory.com/sheep-logic/

    Liked by 1 person

  22. cortesar says:

    hehe this is for trump cultists
    do not tell me that I give you black pills only

    “Alexa who’s the President of the United States” pic.twitter.com/fM8KxKetkO

    — Michael J. Morrison (@OfficeOfMike) July 2, 2018

    Liked by 1 person

  23. Libertardian says:

    https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/07/03/reuters-poll-young-white-americans-flee-democrat-party-in-droves-since-trumps-election/

    Meanwhile, DNC chair Perez says Ocasio is the future of the Dem party. Battle lines keep getting clearer.

    Like

    • oink says:

      what use is a cuck, if not to die for his Massa?

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Refresh our memories, oinky-doink…

        Are the flower of young kike mahood dying for wars that help out ‘Murrica or have American soldiers been dying for Israel?

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • oink says:

        exactly my point. Massa’s wishes, chuck fulfils

        if we gonna repeat the “but Massa been svengallied all along!” shtick, let’s not

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        As usual, the same ol’, lame ol’ distraction and avoidance.

        Shuck n’ jive, kosher style.

        oink, you’re pathetic.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      They talk that stupid cunt up like she is running for president. How many other congressional races get this kind of nation attention? She is another Manchurian candidate like Obama.

      Like

  24. Lichthof says:

    That shocking Benjamin Eastman murder and r@pe in Washington state…the victim and the 2 murderers from broken homes.
    The murderers were half brothers..one white…one Hispanic

    All fuck.ed up

    Like

    • Lichthof says:

      Benjamin RIP

      Like

    • HungarianPatriot says:

      Womp womp “broken homes poor darlings” Gtfoh, have the fuckers eaten alive by a few pit bulls and be done with it. What’s the big deal? They really should give me Sessions’ job, I’d sort out these f@gs in a jiffy.

      Like

      • HungarianPatriot says:

        Come to think of it, I wouldn’t even need humans to carry out my orders. My staffers could be composed entirely of pit bulls.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      What was the point of bringing this “fucked up” crime to our attention?

      Genuinely curious about your thought process here.

      Like

      • Dread Forman says:

        lichtoff is a stooge

        Like

      • oink says:

        what doubt can still be there about GodDamned BND plant?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I doubt the Germans have any interest ’round chere…

        … but this Lichthof… along with some other yeggs… gotta start checking their premises on what is elucidating fare for the chateau.

        Stuff like this just dries up the soul.

        Like

      • oink says:

        Please note BND plant has not used the words mein, adolf, kampf, and hitler in a previous post discussin AH’s oeuvre.

        if you propose bnd devotes less resource to controlling WWW perceptions than Director Pardo’s outfit, I have some promising Galician oilfields to interest you in investing.

        Controlling/influencing non-german public opinion has been a chief concern of German State since 1916, particularly but not only during AH years

        Wise like snakes, nondenominational Chateau guest!

        Like

      • oink says:

        The Reich got significant egg-in-face in 1914 and its agents discussed openly their failing and need for improvement

        Like

      • Lichthof says:

        It’s a CH theme..especially since Parkland.. .single parent families create dysfunctional kids
        America dystopia.
        The victim lived with his Dad. No motherly love. A white kid murdered on this fucking world.
        The half brothers have different names.
        Not even the same race.

        Just a horrific crime that should be getting more attention

        Like

      • Lichthof says:

        Oink…I’m not even German. Carry on..you are fucking paranoid.

        Next time Greg..I’ll run my posting by you first

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        As I said, you’re not bringing anything new to the table in re single-parent households.

        And the fact that a White kid and his spic half-brother killed another White kid is not something we need to be reminded of.

        In short, THIS IS WHY WE LOSE… and you FUCKING ASSHOLES that think this is something you should bring to our attention are either mentally-deficient stooges who carry more water for the Synathdral than their own soldiers do, or… you’re what suspicions of others say you are.

        Which is it, Lichtof? You a stooge or just doing your shill duty?

        (((SHAKIN’ MAH HAID))) 😡

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Next time Greg..I’ll run my posting by you first

        No need for that, snarky… just use your haid for something other than a hat rack.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        jeez greg for 564th time tries to play the holy inquisitor here
        it is not up to you to decide what is going posted despite your shaking your head 1256th time
        (assisted by in far the greatest idiot here)
        that story illustrates how sick our culture and society have become and if you think that by closing your precious boomer’s s eyes the problem will go away
        you are sadly mistaken
        stop playing inquisition here

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Fuck you, cort… you guys want your say and I’ll have mine.

        If it stings, then maybe what I’m saying has teeth.

        You want to be deluged with negative energy, that’s your hang up.

        There are certain examples of this sick society and the current malaise that we don’t have to be reminded of.

        On a side note, thanks for that funny Alexa video… there’s an example of a morale booster…

        …. but fuck you anyway, whether you want to hear my upbraidings or not.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        You want to be deluged with negative energy, that’s your hang up
        ————————————————————————————-
        I do not think other than a few untalented trolls want to be “deluged with negative energy”
        before you can solve a problem you have to recognize it, asses it and understand it
        running away from will never solve it
        btw what happened with your credo of being always on the side of truth no matter what
        and yes of course fuck yourself too

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        You know, you so-called alt-R allies always try to rationalize posting soul-curdling shit with that lame “a problem must be recognized in order to deal with it” lame ass excuse.

        As if the chateau hasn’t already mentioned and posted articles INNUMERABLE times in re the indisputable fact that single parent households breed miscreants.

        Oh, but thanks EVER so much for reminding us… for a moment there I thought we might have forgotten. :duckface

        ESPECIALLY when the unicorn instance occurs, where a White boy with his spic half brother rape and kill another White kid.

        Now, the next time some n1ggers pull one of their heinous crimes of this nature, we can all say “Well, WHITE BOYS DO IT TOO!”

        You dense, disingenuous fucks. 😡

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        btw what happened with your credo of being always on the side of truth no matter what

        The truth I speak of is when things and people are being misrepresented and/or something is generally unknown and confusion abounds.

        Throwing the more distasteful examples of news items about things we’re all already TOO well aware of is, as mentioned, soul-curdling information that doesn’t enlighten, it merely disheartens.

        And YOU know this difference, so don’t be trying any disingenuous jew-jitsu of flapping of your yap in order to bolster a losing argument.

        As Howard Covington says, the problem with the White race has become the Character Issue… how can the people be so wrong when the cause is so right?

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Check that, Harold Covington… y’all should read his Northwest novels when you get a chance.

        Like

      • Lichthof says:

        I am taking a hiatus from posting here. I will still read the excellent posts.

        Oink.. you are such a genius you missed my posts abut my father being British ah well. This BND stuff is bizarre. You are deluded and well just piss me off by tagging onto my every post in a creepy way. It gets tiring and you are distracting from the issue which makes me think you are probably from an agency.

        Greg- I use to like your posts but I don’t know what you add now. You censure and comment on other posts. That is all you do. What’s happened?

        I never take part in the bitch fight that goes on here sometimes. I never comment on other people’s posts. Just seems stupid. I mean we are all on the same side right?

        it’s a red pill sight and supposedly “men are talking” but seems alot of people can not handle some truths or news or blackpills.

        This is an excellent site but CH needs to reign oink, CD etc in or the comments section are going to turn into muck.

        Like

      • Lichthof says:

        Finally – I thought I’d remember Benjamin. A white kid brought into this world and let down by the people and society around him.
        His life and Thomas Lehman’s death in Ohio affected me as a father myself.
        No protests for them by white shitlibs….just two dead white kids.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Greg- I use to like your posts but I don’t know what you add now. You censure and comment on other posts. That is all you do. What’s happened?

        Well, if you’d truly be fair, that’s NOT “all I do”… I give a fair share of atta-boys when they’re merited, and the occasional insight and wry observation as well.

        Sorry to have hurt your ego on this particular issue, but if you can’t see and admit the point I made about Debbie Downer items that don’t bring any new revelations, but serve to leave a bad taste and dishearten, then that’s more on your character than mine.

        That said, an occasional self-imposed hiatus is good for the soul… ask me how I know.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        No protests for them by white shitlibs….just two dead white kids.

        Crimes like this are pretty much weekly occurrences… and in the rare occasions when the miscreants are White themselves, you’re not going to get much coverage anyway, and certainly no “outrage” from the Left (DUH!).

        For the record, from what I’ve read of Lehman, he was a father himself, and not a kid.

        Further, if we start pointing out all the heinous instances of black-on-white crime, which wrenches the soul even more, there’s not going to be enough time to think of much anything else.

        The alt-R, before Cyberia, used to be full of the proverbial little old ladies in tennis shoes that used to send monthly newsletters around, detailing each new and gruesome instance of negro atrocity… such items were a staple in most samizdat offerings…

        … but as long as there are gated communities and suburbs to run to, and a grocery store on every corner, beer in the fridge, and 100 channels on the dish, don’t expect any White protests or backlash, here in ‘Murrica.

        And you’re going to have to explain to me what telling us about White-on-White atrocities is going to achieve ’round chere, besides telling us what we already know about single-parent households, and giving us a fuck this ghey earth outlook.

        tl;dr- if a particular crime is especially noteworthy for what it shows about this society, that’s one thing. But posting an instance of White-on-White crime just feeds the “There, you see… Whites do it too!” Narrative.

        Like

      • oink says:

        n.b., still no posting of the verboten words of adolf, kampf, hitler, or mein by not-BND-whatsoever “alt-right ally”

        whatever

        Like

  25. Not sure I’ll vote again for Trump if he appoints a woman to the Supreme Court. Esp. the one-worlder with adopted kids from all over the place, sounds like angel jolie or whatever the heck her name is. Gotta screw loose. how about a white protestant guy from the midwest for the sake of diversity. that woman has too many kids to be taking on the job of Supreme Court judge. Sorry

    Liked by 1 person

  26. oink says:

    In more uplifting news. Why wypipo?

    Because Volanthen and Stanton

    Like

  27. Cracker says:

    thank you CH for including my comment and adding your stellar (as usual) commentary. it’s an honor

    Liked by 1 person

  28. Carlos Danger says:

    Feminist shrikes are a boner killer. Plain and simple. If she makes more than you, almost always due to state supported artificial advantages, she won’t need you or your money or your protection from the big bad wolf. The state promoting them limits your own career opportunities creating double resentment. If she is spending all her time at the office being a career shrike, there is no time or inclination for sex or making a pleasant home. I do not want to listen to some broad blather on about the treachery of other artificially promoted broads at work when I come home after dealing with it all day myself and being forced to pay the bill for it too by the limitations to my own opportunities. I come to view such women not as my refuge from all that but as part of the problem and come to deeply resent them for it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      CD, it really does seem to be amazing how many coup1es fail to sit down and have an honest heart-2-heart conversation as to what exactly m@rried life is gonna entail [prior to actually getting m@rried].

      I can’t imagine m@rrying a chick without first being firmly convinced that she’s on board with 100% home schooling, 100% home cooked natural meals [no processed food], daily cardio exercise for the ch!ldren, living in the countryside rather than in a development, etc etc etc.

      Of course, having that honest conversation would likely devastate & obliviate an yuuggge percentage of all relationships [which is maybe why thirsty dudes don’t have the conversation?].

      Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        And of course ZERO iPhag or Scr0tial Media use in the family.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        I think I read on Rollo or prolly Dalrock that one way to find out about your girl’s thoughts on m@rriage are to ask her what she’s looking forward to about getting hitched.

        If her reply is about all the showers and gifts and the w3dding itself (re: party) and the hon3ymoon, then drop her right there.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Captain Obvious says:

        obliviate = obliterate

        It doesn’t seem to be in the dictionary, but “obliviate” has a nice ring to it.

        Apparently “Oblivia” is a South American sun flower.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        You are absolutely right. Most guys are only thinking of the money she will make and in some areas you need to have both working to afford a house. Most men beg for pussy anyway and you have a subset of wives who insist on working. I recently did an audit of our child care center and I was amazed at how many non-working mothers still put their kid in daycare. I think that is criminal.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “non-working mothers still put their kid in daycare”

        SPECIAL. PLACE. IN. HE11.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Like

  29. Carlos Danger says:

    Like

  30. james says:

    I love science.

    Like

Leave a Reply