Reciprocal obsession.
(a lovely lady asked)
Where pretty lies perish.
U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman fined her $5,000, describing the case as a situation where an otherwise good person, upset by immigration policies in this country, made a bad decision in the moment.
It's a jew. Again.
Like it or not, America must lose this war of aggression against Iran, for White Americans to win the war of a genuine homeland.
The weimarican empire must meet defeat after defeat, failure upon failure. Globohomo must not be allowed a single moment of self-congratulation.
It is for this reason that I fear Trump and Israel, implicitly understanding the wider implications of this war, may turn to nukes if Iran gets the upper hand.
Yup, 1945-1970 America was 90% White, and that period coincided with what is known as "the Great Compression". Economic policies in the wake of the New Deal established a regime of rising single-earner wages, declining inequality, increasing happiness, and a decreasing income and wealth gap between the ownership class and the labor class.
1970 was the inflection point when all that began to unravel, and then accelerate under Reaganism.
I avoid using the Opaque Kingdom (China) as an example of anything, but in this case it is worth exploring the idea that China runs something akin to a part-socialism, part-capitalism system, by allowing a free market private economy to flourish, but setting guardrails around it with big public works projects and rules prohibiting wealthy capitalists from having any say in Chinese politics or policymaking.
Yes, good comment. And the dissenters would be wise to understand that their dissent can only give them a sense of purpose and an emotional payoff if it is part of a collective order, and resisting something much larger and more permanent than itself.
Dissent in atomized chaos is just another vector of self-annihilation.
IMO the terms socialism, and communism, are red herrings, meant to rile up Whites still trapped in finkelthink.
Even the famed Nordic countries don't have genuine socialism. They practice welfare capitalism.
We could go a long ways to a more liveable society just by reining in the excesses of rapacious finance capitalism, but to do so would require re-homogenizing America to White supermajority status or, barring that, by breaking apart America into ethnostates.
The Systemic Shtetl doesn't want that, so it manipulates White perception by attaching loaded terms such as "socialism" to any remedies that would bring real relief to White Americans.
If the inequality of man is baked into the code of nature, then socialism could be viewed as an ameliorative policy agenda that reduces the kinship frictions and societal corrosiveness caused by the grotesquely skewed distribution of wealth within a purely predatory capitalist regime.
That has nothing to do with self-centeredness and everything do with fulfilling the desire to live within and as part of a functioning, pleasant, pro-social society.
Caveat: It will only work in a racially homogeneous society.
This is an obvious atheist attempt to reconcile the Big Bang Paradox. If the universe appeared after a pinprick of incomprehensible energy exploded everything into existence, then naturally the logic follows "where did the pinprick of energy come from?".
The atheists have never been able to satisfactorily answer this conundrum to their worldview, which is why they are clinging to cringey theories about quantum cosmology creating something from nothing.
Breast milk: "Hey, I'm over here. Hello?! Remember me? I used to do things besides supplement job resumes and stunlock betaboy simps."
If the Union is indistinguishable from a hellscape providing endless torments for Whites, it becomes a moral and survival imperative to destroy it.
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s Place

A second hand emotion
LikeLiked by 1 person
Who needs a heart when a heart can be broken?
LikeLike
Black or not, that was a real woman (feminine).
I wonder why Ike smacked her.
LikeLike
Genetik based Sexual match plus Christian definition of marriage (helpmeet stuff)
LikeLike
Baby, don’t hurt me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No more.
LikeLike
“Reciprocal obsession”
Works for me.
LikeLike
Ideal love is to extract the emotion on continuous drip from the woman, retaining control at all times, and turning her into your love-slave, on her knees, head bowed, while you proceed to gain greater and greater control over all females in the vicinity, forcing them to BATHE THEIR FILTHY PUSSIES at least twice a day, and end up retaking the world for men.
That’s love, Heartiste. Fuck your mutual-obsession shite. When you get to Vancouver, HBomb, xxI’ma hafta begin the reeducation of you into a darker, superior path you were meant to tred on.
X.
LikeLike
^unrequited obsession
LikeLiked by 3 people
[…] What Is Love? […]
LikeLike
Love is a contest to out-bless each other, in the sack and out.
LikeLike
Baby dont hurt me, dont hurt me no more…
LikeLike
I had to…
LikeLiked by 3 people
Kill your romantic/sentimental side.(OK, you can keep a small sliver of it) Don’t go through life being that luv-struck Disney character with birds flying around his head chirping.
LikeLike
I thought that was what happened when a character was whacked over the head…
LikeLiked by 1 person
*momentary reciprocal obsession; when the moment is gone, so is she, and so is the contents of your wallet.
LikeLike
She’ll be the first to go, that’s by nature’s script.
Watched a film on Bob Dylan (by Haynes) the other day — Dylan disorders a pair of chicks’ preconceptions by saying “Women don’t have access to the same level of suffering men have. That’s why they can’t be poets.”
They cluster about the median third of the Bell Curve in just every mental trait — save for deception and self-deception.
LikeLike
Just a medium of exchange:
“Jackie simply took her engagement ring off her finger and slipped it into Husted’s jacket pocket when she next saw him.
‘She was ice cold. Like we never knew each other,’ Husted recalled.
‘I understood the end had come. I never heard from her again.’ ”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5401615/The-sisters-competed-snare-worlds-richest-men.html
LikeLike
Wonder how many feminists will complain about this crass act of sexism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s also amazing how much cut throat competition there is among sisters of any social class, especially when mommy instigates. Coming to think about it, that could have been a motivation behind me breaking up my engagement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
DUDE. I have a long winded story about this, but yes, so much yes to this comment.
LikeLike
He should’ve given her the bird as a parting shot.
LikeLike
Paraphrasing HL Mencken’s dark pill:
“The illusion that one woman is different than the others by virtue of her acting as if the sun rises and sets in your pants.”
For the beta: willing to die for someone or something.
For the alpha: willing to kill for someone or something.
LikeLike
“For the beta: willing to die for someone or something.”
Which is why, as much as I find common ground with Christians, I’m not a fan of the concept of martyrdom, precisely because it seems too beta and cowardly.
LikeLike
I agree. Especially in the US. Why should Christians rush to martyrdom when we all own f1r3arms?
LikeLike
For the cuck: willing to be humiliated for something.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol.
Then, who wills to both die and kill? The sigma?
I think at a Jungian archetypical depth, dying and killing for something are neighbours.
LikeLike
Never mistake love for desire. Desire is biological attraction.
Love is the willingness to make an effort, or pay a price, to promote the happiness and well-being of another. Love is the man who dives on the grenade to save his squad mates. Love is the man spending years working a shitty, stressful job so his wife and kids can have a good life. Love is doing what makes the one you love happy, because doing so makes YOU happy.
When selecting for a wife, the most important thing is to pick a girl who loves YOU. My wife may not be as cute as when I first met her 35 years and several kids ago, but she still crawls into bed naked next to me, and her body is my property in the night.
LikeLiked by 5 people
To fall in love is to create a religion that has a fallible god.
Jorge Luis Borges
fallible and mortal too but above the one that farts
nothing kills divine as quickly as a fart does
divine must function beyond corporal in order to be
as for human infatuations, being of ephemeral nature, they are lighter than dust except for those who cannot recognize the supremacy of comedy as a fundamental genre of existence
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amazing quotation.
Borger kinda pwned CH there. Lol.
LikeLike
“When the happiness of another person becomes as essential to yourself as your own,”
However, if this is unreciprocated, this becomes obsession.
LikeLike
Nah. It gets an obsession label slapped on by the less-interested of the two.
It’s always an obsession, whether or not it be returned (women have an animus and not an anima, so they will, in speaking terms, stay at a lower-pressure, less deep level anyway).
LikeLike
Aye. When I finally kicked my Russian ex out after foolishly bringing her to the US, I reflected on what happened and realized that back in her country we both considered the other out of our league, which led to a relationship that was more or less heaven on earth. Not surprisingly the dynamic changed quickly when I brought her home, breaking the spell.
LikeLike
How and why?
LikeLike
It’s a weakness.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
What some are pleased to call love, is really a more intense form of infatuation.
It is certainly a fleeting emotion.
LikeLike
Eros, Philia, Agape, Storge, Caritas.
LikeLike
Chemical reactions interpreted by inexperience.
Full stop.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No.
Not everyone is that lucky.
LikeLike
To define properly have to be more specific, there are different types of love (read c.s. Lewis “the four loves”). Best general description is below.
Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil; Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth; Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A trick biology uses to get us to breed.
LikeLike
Love is the psychic bond between a mother and a child. It exists among all mammals.
For the adult male, it comes as a reminiscence of this feeling.
For the adult female, it doesn’t exist, since she can’t mistake her partner for her mother.
LikeLike
And what do people obsess about?
That which other people desire.
So, can true mutual love only exist between alpha men and alpha women?
Alpha women referring to the traditional sense that is defined by beauty and feminine grace, not the nuwoman aggro-lesbo personality type.
LikeLike