Reciprocal obsession.
(a lovely lady asked)
Where pretty lies perish.
I would vote for him before Vance or whatever anti-white golem the Dems nominate. Not saying Hunter Biden will be Hitler Biden, but the sheer lunacy of a President Crackpipe could widen the fissures in Weimarica, and pave the way for a third (reich) party.
If Hitler (pbuh) came back to Germany today, he would weep bitter tears first, and then he would reconstitute the Third Reich, but instead of conquering Globobolshevism, he'd direct the full might of the German Wotanic spirit against the traitors within Germany.
It's a pathology at this point. It should be an affliction with a DSM-V designation.
Thais are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Vietnamese are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Somalis are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Haitians are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Indians are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Hondurans are only 1% of your local community, no big deal.
Then one day, you'll look out across your town square, and blond-haired children will be 1% of your local community.
And that will be a big deal.
Better idea: Import the recipes, leave the Thais home.
"Bonnie Pierce had already escaped her burning Minnesota home when she realized her toddler was still trapped inside. She turned around and RAN BACK INTO THE FIRE for her little girl.
When firefighters reached them, Bonnie was unconscious with her body wrapped around Grace, shielding her daughter from the flames and smoke."
Her daughter survived.
This is how a healthy society should revere motherhood. It recognizes true maternal heroism and carries along the lesson to each generation, as part of its sustaining mythos, that mothers will sacrifice everything for their children.
An evil society gathers its flock along roadsides, to toss roses and weepy tributes to a mother accused of murdering her three children.
There is a kernel of truth in this meme, which is why it resonates. But as with all memes, full truth often is not so easily encapsulated.
Women have some moral and actionable agency. They make personal decisions based on innate desires, just like men do, except framed by their female nature.
Women's poor life decisions and political insanities are not entirely the fault of jewish agitprop. Their liberation, a predictable consequence of late stage empire trajectories, removes patriarchal guardrails that had channeled female hypergamy away from reckless manifestations. "Feminism" becomes the easy choice for modren men whose own manly virtues have fled them.
But, women by nature are also consensus seekers, and like a dog without a pack leader, feel unmoored and anxious when there is no social consensus for them to follow and mimic. Women become "bitey" under those conditions, and unloveable. This reality of female nature makes it possible for malignant outsiders, like the jews, to manipulate female consensus-seeking by substituting the organic consensus of White male society with the alien consensus of subversive jewish values.
Once the new consensus is established in the void of the surrendered traditional consensus, women flock (heh) to it, even if it is harmful to them over the long run.
What I am getting at here is that the correct lens through which to analyze the behavior of modren White women is one that recognizes their agency and the share of blame they must incur for their bad choices and even worse politics, while also recognizing the imposition of a foreign virus that has hijacked the emotional needs of our women to direct its expression to foul ends.
The inevitable decay of empire virtues coupled with the inevitable subversion of jewish influence is a force multiplier of White female lunacy and race treason.
In practical terms, what this means is that White men face a choice: place all blame on their women, no blame on their women, or a mix of blame and leniency.
The All Blame option leaves jewish agitprop in place, an intolerable compromise.
The No Blame option requires the complete disenfranchisement of women from politics and much of the consensus-shaping culture. Effectively, women will be treated like children with limited rights and limited accountabilty.
The Blame and Leniency option removes jewish agitprop while simultaneously shaming women away from self-destructive politics, race betrayal, and personal behaviors that cheapen their value to White men.
This is why I have maintained all along that the WQ and the JQ are at once inseparable yet unique enough in their attributes to come under separate scrutiny.
White knightoids for some low-T reason are butthurt about this fundamental truth.
Protestantism is the child of Hajnalism. When Whites of Northwest Europe became more individualistic and "bootstrappy", it inevitably followed that those same Whites would chafe at a universalizing religious authority and strike out on their own.
It's somewhat comical to consider the irony of the Catholic Church's ban on cousin marriage, which set in motion the genetic selection for more individualistic Whites, was the very seed which grew into the dominant schism that fractured the Church.
When White racial rightists were a nonthreatening circus sideshow, establishment conservatives of the jewniparty felt comfortable winking and nodding at their grievances.
Now that White racial rightists are drawing immense interest and gathering followers by the millions and becoming a major threat to the jewniparty, establishment conservatives have frantically pivoted to dowsing the fire of White rage in the hope of quashing the only real solution to the problems that these cuckservatives pretended to care about.
Most people don’t know that Frank Sinatra has an arrest record and a mugshot to match. The reason for his arrest may be even more surprising. The official charge? Seduction.
This seemingly archaic charge was generally applied when a man convinced an unmarried woman of good repute to engage in an inappropriate encounter with him. There was generally a promise of marriage that was never actually forthcoming, thereby ruining her reputation.
In 1938, a 23-year-old Sinatra found himself in just such a situation, and he was officially arrested and booked for Seduction. The charge was eventually dropped when it was discovered that the supposedly single woman was in fact married. Later that year, armed with this new information, the original charge was revised slightly, and Sinatra was again arrested, this time for Adultery.
https://www.crimemuseum.org/crime-library/celebrity-mugshots/frank-sinatra/
It's interesting that at a time when the patriarchy that feminists decry ruled America, a man could be arrested for "Seduction" or Adultery.
Now, in the ashes of the patriarchy and in the full flower of the gynarchy with its contraception and abortion handmaidens, a man can pump and dump his way through a small army of feminists with nary a disruption to his hedonistic lifestyle.
Comments are a lunchroom food fight and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Chateau Heartiste proprietors or contributors.
Visit the Goodbye, America photojournal website.
Then cleanse your visual palate with a visit to the Welcome Back, America photojournal website.
Alternative Right
AmRen
Anonymous Conservative
Audacious Epigone
Dusk in Autumn
Education Realist
Evo and Proud
Gene Expression
Hail to You
Hawaiian Libertarian
Lion of the Blogosphere
My Posting Career
PA World and Times
Page for men
Parapundit
Rogue Health and Fitness
Steve Sailer
The Anti-Gnostic
The Kakistocracy
The Red Pill Review
Unqualified Reservations
Vox Popoli
West Hunter
Whiskey’s Place

A second hand emotion
LikeLiked by 1 person
Who needs a heart when a heart can be broken?
LikeLike
Black or not, that was a real woman (feminine).
I wonder why Ike smacked her.
LikeLike
Genetik based Sexual match plus Christian definition of marriage (helpmeet stuff)
LikeLike
Baby, don’t hurt me.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No more.
LikeLike
“Reciprocal obsession”
Works for me.
LikeLike
Ideal love is to extract the emotion on continuous drip from the woman, retaining control at all times, and turning her into your love-slave, on her knees, head bowed, while you proceed to gain greater and greater control over all females in the vicinity, forcing them to BATHE THEIR FILTHY PUSSIES at least twice a day, and end up retaking the world for men.
That’s love, Heartiste. Fuck your mutual-obsession shite. When you get to Vancouver, HBomb, xxI’ma hafta begin the reeducation of you into a darker, superior path you were meant to tred on.
X.
LikeLike
^unrequited obsession
LikeLiked by 3 people
[…] What Is Love? […]
LikeLike
Love is a contest to out-bless each other, in the sack and out.
LikeLike
Baby dont hurt me, dont hurt me no more…
LikeLike
I had to…
LikeLiked by 3 people
Kill your romantic/sentimental side.(OK, you can keep a small sliver of it) Don’t go through life being that luv-struck Disney character with birds flying around his head chirping.
LikeLike
I thought that was what happened when a character was whacked over the head…
LikeLiked by 1 person
*momentary reciprocal obsession; when the moment is gone, so is she, and so is the contents of your wallet.
LikeLike
She’ll be the first to go, that’s by nature’s script.
Watched a film on Bob Dylan (by Haynes) the other day — Dylan disorders a pair of chicks’ preconceptions by saying “Women don’t have access to the same level of suffering men have. That’s why they can’t be poets.”
They cluster about the median third of the Bell Curve in just every mental trait — save for deception and self-deception.
LikeLike
Just a medium of exchange:
“Jackie simply took her engagement ring off her finger and slipped it into Husted’s jacket pocket when she next saw him.
‘She was ice cold. Like we never knew each other,’ Husted recalled.
‘I understood the end had come. I never heard from her again.’ ”
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5401615/The-sisters-competed-snare-worlds-richest-men.html
LikeLike
Wonder how many feminists will complain about this crass act of sexism.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s also amazing how much cut throat competition there is among sisters of any social class, especially when mommy instigates. Coming to think about it, that could have been a motivation behind me breaking up my engagement.
LikeLiked by 1 person
DUDE. I have a long winded story about this, but yes, so much yes to this comment.
LikeLike
He should’ve given her the bird as a parting shot.
LikeLike
Paraphrasing HL Mencken’s dark pill:
“The illusion that one woman is different than the others by virtue of her acting as if the sun rises and sets in your pants.”
For the beta: willing to die for someone or something.
For the alpha: willing to kill for someone or something.
LikeLike
“For the beta: willing to die for someone or something.”
Which is why, as much as I find common ground with Christians, I’m not a fan of the concept of martyrdom, precisely because it seems too beta and cowardly.
LikeLike
I agree. Especially in the US. Why should Christians rush to martyrdom when we all own f1r3arms?
LikeLike
For the cuck: willing to be humiliated for something.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Lol.
Then, who wills to both die and kill? The sigma?
I think at a Jungian archetypical depth, dying and killing for something are neighbours.
LikeLike
Never mistake love for desire. Desire is biological attraction.
Love is the willingness to make an effort, or pay a price, to promote the happiness and well-being of another. Love is the man who dives on the grenade to save his squad mates. Love is the man spending years working a shitty, stressful job so his wife and kids can have a good life. Love is doing what makes the one you love happy, because doing so makes YOU happy.
When selecting for a wife, the most important thing is to pick a girl who loves YOU. My wife may not be as cute as when I first met her 35 years and several kids ago, but she still crawls into bed naked next to me, and her body is my property in the night.
LikeLiked by 5 people
To fall in love is to create a religion that has a fallible god.
Jorge Luis Borges
fallible and mortal too but above the one that farts
nothing kills divine as quickly as a fart does
divine must function beyond corporal in order to be
as for human infatuations, being of ephemeral nature, they are lighter than dust except for those who cannot recognize the supremacy of comedy as a fundamental genre of existence
LikeLiked by 1 person
Amazing quotation.
Borger kinda pwned CH there. Lol.
LikeLike
“When the happiness of another person becomes as essential to yourself as your own,”
However, if this is unreciprocated, this becomes obsession.
LikeLike
Nah. It gets an obsession label slapped on by the less-interested of the two.
It’s always an obsession, whether or not it be returned (women have an animus and not an anima, so they will, in speaking terms, stay at a lower-pressure, less deep level anyway).
LikeLike
Aye. When I finally kicked my Russian ex out after foolishly bringing her to the US, I reflected on what happened and realized that back in her country we both considered the other out of our league, which led to a relationship that was more or less heaven on earth. Not surprisingly the dynamic changed quickly when I brought her home, breaking the spell.
LikeLike
How and why?
LikeLike
It’s a weakness.
LikeLike
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
LikeLike
What some are pleased to call love, is really a more intense form of infatuation.
It is certainly a fleeting emotion.
LikeLike
Eros, Philia, Agape, Storge, Caritas.
LikeLike
Chemical reactions interpreted by inexperience.
Full stop.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No.
Not everyone is that lucky.
LikeLike
To define properly have to be more specific, there are different types of love (read c.s. Lewis “the four loves”). Best general description is below.
Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil; Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth; Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things.
LikeLiked by 1 person
A trick biology uses to get us to breed.
LikeLike
Love is the psychic bond between a mother and a child. It exists among all mammals.
For the adult male, it comes as a reminiscence of this feeling.
For the adult female, it doesn’t exist, since she can’t mistake her partner for her mother.
LikeLike
And what do people obsess about?
That which other people desire.
So, can true mutual love only exist between alpha men and alpha women?
Alpha women referring to the traditional sense that is defined by beauty and feminine grace, not the nuwoman aggro-lesbo personality type.
LikeLike