Feed on
Posts
Comments

After you read this incredibly Millennial news story, you’ll understand why I titled this post “The Voluntarily Sexless Marriage” instead of “The Voluntarily Celibate Marriage”. Our platonically married couple isn’t celibate at all; they’re just celibate for each other.

The sexless marriage is a timeless rue with an explainable kernel of pedestrian truth to it, but at least it can be said for men trapped in age-independent sexless marriages that their woeful predicament wasn’t contractually inked before the vows were exchanged. Not so for Tiffany Trump’s newlywed friends:

When New York socialites Quentin Esme Brown and Peter Cary Peterson got hitched in Las Vegas over the weekend in front of a small group of friends — including Tiffany Trump, who acted as the flower girl — they knew that people would make some assumptions. Either they were madly in love or drunk, right? In reality, the best friends said they were neither. They’re planning to make theirs a sexless, open marriage, they explained, and this actually sounds like a pretty wise idea to relationship experts.

100% of chaimstream media approved “relationship experts” are charlatans.

“Sexless marriage”. An irretrievably broken, anhedonic society at war with the reality of innate sex differences takes the one redeeming feature of marriage and tosses it away.

A sexless marriage is pointless, but a sexless, OPEN marriage is just plain malicious, because those super progressive, feminist friendly polyamorous arrangements never benefit both parties equally; it’s usually the slutty woman getting her rocks off down the hall as her moans of ecstasy drive her incel “partner” crazy with murder-suicide ideation.

“He has always been my soulmate in every sense of the word

Women and men have competing definitions of “soulmate”. Men tend to emphasize the “mate” part of the term.

and we felt mutually that Vegas was the place to finalize our commitment to partnership,” Brown explained on Instagram. “Peter and I are not romantically involved — in fact we are still dating others and will continue to seek love in all forms — we are just each other’s hearts and wish to begin our journey towards evolution, because the more we face reality, the more we can see that there is no right or wrong.”

Poopytalk. They’re doing the opposite of facing reality; they’re hiding from it under cover of Clown World’s Cloak of Inchoateness. If Tiffany Trump’s friends are indicative of Tiffany’s own views, it’s no wonder Papa Trump practically disowned her.

Susan Pease Gadoua, a licensed therapist

Licensed to bilk.

and co-author of The New “I Do,” has yet to meet anyone else with this kind of marriage, but she says it fits in with the way she sees many people deciding to change the rules to suit their relationship needs.

Dope. People aren’t changing the rules to suit their piques; they’re lowering their expectations and adapting to the encroaching jungle.

“We don’t need to get married for any of the reasons we used to,”

Including but not limited to reasons such as reproduction and generational continuity.

Gadoua tells Yahoo Lifestyle. “Once you’ve got everything else in place, it is like the cherry on top.”

But Brown and Peterson don’t seem to have married for children. So why get married at all?

The question with no answer that won’t sound like a try-hard rationalization.

“We did this because we wanted to finalize our commitment to each other as life partners and best friends,” Peterson wrote on Instagram.

What happened to mutually presumed and unspoken loyalty between friends? If you have to rely on the imprimatur of State authorization to declare your shared friendship, you don’t have anything remotely resembling a friendship. Instead, you have a pose. Two attention whores jockeying for social status within their group of unloveable weirdos.

Brown also put a statement on Instagram, saying, “I am confident my husband and I will break some walls down,” she wrote.

If your official terms of endearment preclude fucking, he’s not your husband.

Husband:

before 1000; Middle English husband(e), Old English hūsbonda master of the house

You haven’t consecrated a house for him to master. You’re two neutered farm animals who happen to be dozing in the same bed of hay and dried manure.

“A lot of these sorts of marriages are in response to society getting increasingly isolated, and people want to create a kinship model. You either have to be married or you have to be blood relatives; otherwise, you can walk away from each other.”

Like I wrote, adaptation to the r-selected jungle.

This kind of union may in fact last longer than a marriage based solely on intense romantic attraction, Gadoua surmises.

Well, sure. Because it isn’t a marriage. It’s a zero-investment masquerade. It’s easy to let a “sexless, open marriage” linger for eternity because the cost of upkeep and dissolution is negligible. No romantic reward, no romantic risk.

The other advantage is that the friends can seek out those romances outside of this relationship. In this way, their setup resembles the kind of polyamorous arrangement that some couples have found to be a better alternative to divorce.

“Some couples” = a few physically and psychologically repulsive losers who can’t hack it in the human sphere where standards still exist.

“Where the complications are going to come in is when people outside their relationship look at it like, ‘I don’t want to get involved in that,’” Gadoua says. “It’s going to make it a little bit more complicated for them to find partners who understand.”

GIRL: hey I’m free for that drink Thursday, but I should tell you I’m married to a great guy, but we never have sex. It’s in our vows.

THE DEVIL’S HARD BARGAIN: fantastic! you sound totally normal. I’m scratching you in now as my third stringer.

Rodman also cautions that this won’t work if one partner isn’t being entirely honest about what he or she wants in this relationship.

“If one person was secretly hoping that this would turn into something romantic or sexual, then that would be quite the disappointment,” she says.

The Voluntarily Sexless Marriage is the next evolution in beta male bait. Watch for hordes of thirsty betas to jump in with both feet hoping a piece of worthless paper has the power to unplug the tingle spigot.

But if we’re to take Brown and Peterson at their word, they’re pretty happy with their decision so far.

“We have one life,” Brown wrote. “Free yourself!”

Combined IQ: 1

Time for a Phys Quiz. The glowing, and strangely tense, lovebirds:

Hm mm mm. So progressive! Tiffany Trump’s friend married her gay bestie. Cameras and Yahoo blog typists are standing by….

PS I was planning to award Peter Peterson both the coveted Beta of the Month and White Male Pussy of the Month titles, but as you can see from the picture above, those titles aren’t applicable.

161 Responses to “The Voluntarily Sexless Marriage”

  1. Jim says:

    Those “polyamorous arrangements” are ridiculous, and everyone knows it.

    I’ve had a half dozen girls on Tinder tell me they didn’t care that I was married, as long as my wife didn’t know about it, because they thought all the “open marriage” people on there were weirdos.

    And as a general rule, if it says “ethical non-monogamy” or some similar word salad in their profile, 99 times out of 100 they’re a hosebeast.

    Like

    • Libertardian says:

      Yes. Any 3+ syllable word describing romantic/sexual preferences is like a blazing neon “RUN AWAY” sign.

      Like

    • strongwhitecock says:

      Open marriage people are weirdos. Most of the men in them are cucks, true to the word.

      If a guy cheats on his wife, it’s far more alpha than being in a marriage where you have no reigns on her sexuality and let her fuck anything, and other women know this. It goes back to women wanting a man that will protect her, not willingly give her up to foreign invasion.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Anonymous says:

      Yup… be a cuck or it’s over, baby. All it is. From the get go.

      Like

    • long dong silver says:

      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a clown shoe stomping on normal straight white male face.

      Like

    • rocko says:

      Isnt it funny? Most chicks, but especially single moms will tell you on Tinder to swipe right if you’re only interested in one night stands, but the morality goes out the window when it comes to going after married or men otherwise in a relationship. And I’ve known women who have either cheated on their men or slept with married men and had no regrets. What happened to looking out for their sisters?

      Like

  2. Titus says:

    We deserve to have a foreign soldiery invade our shores, take our women, and breed a hardier race.

    Like

    • Chadmore says:

      Sure we do (((Titus))). Take your demoralization shilling elsewhere

      Liked by 2 people

      • Titus says:

        For fucksake… a little black pill sarcasm and you Nancys start shrieking about cuckery and trying to chest thump my presence off the forum.

        Marriage is the keystone of western civ, and outlets like le Château stand to shine truth into the darkness as marriage and other western social institutions crumble under the septum-pierced blue haired muffin tops of the Fempire.

        Even our host as opined that the cucky soft underbelly of the European tribes need a little tribalistic and aggressive admixture from the Slavic and Southern European tribes to stiffen up the brew a bit as an immunization shot.

        So fucked is the state of marriage that a growing segment of the population will bear witness to a cucked union of financial and emotional extortion. If that segment grows, my words ring true… we do deserve to be overrun if we continue to allow this shit in our society.

        Or in layman’s terms, get the sand out of your mangina over a little gallows humor.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Titus says:

        Dude, it was a fucking joke… sorta. If “””marriages””” like this become more commonplace, undermining the keystone of our civilization, that foreign landing force will eventually come.

        Gallows humor. No need to rub your clit raw.

        Like

    • Anonymous says:

      Speak for yourself, dude.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Jay in DC says:

      And you will watch with cucked delight as they take your woman repeatedly, amirite?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Titus says:

        Don’t be so butthurt about a little gallows humor at the state of our society. Hit me up sometime over on Penn Ave SE sometime after the grind and we can grab a beer and poach little 22 year old congressional staffers.

        Like

    • Craig says:

      You fucking cuck faggot, GTFOH!

      Liked by 1 person

    • HungarianPatriot says:

      Titus I volunteer to fuck yours. I’m pretty damn hairy.

      Liked by 1 person

      • HungarianPatriot says:

        And Hardy… Hehe

        Liked by 1 person

      • Titus says:

        You’re from Hungary. Your empire died last century. Please don’t speed along the death of mine.

        Like

      • HungarianPatriot says:

        @Titus
        You mean that inbred Hapsburg fuckery that carted off our young men to die in senseless brother-wars? Yeah we’re good without that.

        Your empire is a ZOG empire. Always has been always will be fuckwit. And it’s fall will be a lot harder than that of the Hapsburg.

        Like

    • Send me your daughters, sisters and wife if you have any. I’ll impregnate them all with hardy seed and courier them right back to you fucking cuck.

      Like

  3. In order for a marriage to be valid, it has to be consummated.

    But stuff like this is just another demonstration of degenerate culture at work.

    – Gay marriage
    – Women marrying themselves
    – Polygamous marriage
    – Sexless marriage

    All the same crap…next in line will be having the ability to marry animals, or robots, or whatever.

    Like

  4. […] The Voluntarily Sexless Marriage […]

    Like

  5. Michael S says:

    I think you underestimate how pernicious this is. It has some, but little, to do with desperate status-seeking betatude. In the big picture, it’s part of the sustained assault on religion, the nuclear family, and traditional gender roles.

    Their goal is to normalize this behavior in order to cement in the minds of the public the idea of marriage as a public contract to share (or transfer) private property. Once established, religious and traditional marriage norms become “sexist” and the door is wide open for literally any kind of fake marriage including pedos, animal humpers and legal polygamy.

    It’s the true face of poz: deep-seated hatred of anything traditional or western.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Clydesdale says:

      Absolutely right about that. There is, indeed, a very aware, very intelligent, cunning and crafty evilness behind what, on the surface, appears to be sheer and even harmless lunacy.

      The battle isn’t over the “right” of people to stick their sex organs wherever they please, or even to lop them off altogether if they like. It isn’t over whether they can have a party, invite their friends over and recite heartfelt words to each other over how much they mean to each other. It isn’t over whether they can draw up a legally enforceable contract spelling out who pays for what and who gets what in the event they split. Instead, the battle is over the very use of the word “Marriage” itself to describe these increasingly bizarre and profoundly disturbing “relationships.”

      Calling two men shacking up together “married,” or pretending that this girl and her probable closet gay “partner” living in whatever their sexless deal is are somehow “married,” doesn’t break down barriers or strike some sort of blow for freedom. Instead, it mocks and cheapens a sacred and valuable institution that I along with many, many, others take very, very seriously. And that is intentional.

      This battle over a word is not only intended, it is completely rational and a product of intelligent thought on the part of those behind this; people whose thinly disguised goal is the destruction of Christianity, destruction of the nuclear family, and, most importantly, destruction of any independent belief that there are higher powers or interests than the State.

      Like

    • Xtrabeing (starofmagic.wordpress.com) says:

      I would disagree that there’s “a sustained assault,” but you make good points. There ARE forces pushing for sexism as a distortional force that will warp existing, pre-existing I mean, points in the wider society at large. The best and perhaps only way to fight back is through the mass media, but this should be obvious.

      The mass media — as I’ve said time and again here as Sorcerygod, Xwarper the girl-hand-cutter and all the rest of my identities (this is the final identity) — is the key to it all. Seize that and all the dominoes fall in your own direction. The liberals are incompetent with it and look how far they’ve come.

      And now for a cheerful alpha-lovin’ song about a girl being “tamed”:

      Like

    • Kyo says:

      Exactly. And millions of Joe Betas will now be forced into sex-denied faux-marriages by wives who cite nonsense like the above — “Lots of people are doing sexless marriages now! Marriage is about more than* just sex!”

      * – In this sentence, “more than X” is somehow used to mean “something other than X”.

      Like

  6. Libertardian says:

    I just got around to reading Strauss’ “The Truth”. Confirmed all my suspicions that polyland is a circus car train wreck.

    ‘Quentin Esme Brown … Peter Cary Peterson … Susan Pease Gadoua’

    This three name shit is almost as big a red flag as the justly infamous hyphenated last name.

    ‘People aren’t changing the rules to suit their piques; they’re lowering their expectations and adapting to the encroaching jungle.’

    Admitting the r-selected sexual market has beaten you can’t feel very courageous, but I’d think it would healthier than swallowing some empty feelgood ideology and proclaiming victory.

    ‘“We have one life,” Brown wrote. “Free yourself!”’

    Eh that’ll show that goshdarn god of biomechanics, all right.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. martin2 says:

    I am not, I think, especially masculine, but this is all bollocks. What is wrong with young men these days? Obviously if I am married then I expect to be able to engage in sexual congress on demand, barring illness, period, etcetera.
    Only white people are stupid enough to buy into all this crap. “Soul mate”, what does that even mean? A man doesn’t need a “soul mate”, he needs a woman for fucking and breeding. All else is folly.

    Liked by 3 people

  8. Williamk says:

    Guy is obviously gay.

    The girl pretty obviously craves emotional committment, but the whole charade is a shameful admission she can’t get someone she’s attracted to to commit to her. So she had to marry a gay. It’s sad.

    Liked by 3 people

  9. Chadmore says:

    I wonder if there is some business or inheritance angle behind this. Bringing together two rich families or needing to be married per grandma’s will

    [CH” for their sakes, let’s hope so. otherwise, this is a lot of public humiliation to suffer for a positive review from a media whore.]

    Liked by 1 person

    • Roy says:

      Marriage produces no heir.

      Demographics is destiny and those two families are gone. Kaput. Nada. Zero.

      Like

  10. gunslingergregi says:

    why is his hand on her belly then lol
    but yea if ya read about Venezuela ya realize we have no problems

    Like

    • Libertardian says:

      Venezuela, exhibit one zillion that socialism ends in a heartrending humanitarian disaster, but we’ll get it right next time, I swear.

      Liked by 1 person

    • jOHN MOSBY says:

      Looking at that pic ( goot gawd, who would pick black to get married in ? ) it appears that she might be carrying Shitavious’ baby. And yeah, he’s most def a pole smoker and a hamster hider. She’s a whore’s whore, no bout adowt it.

      Like

  11. Hugh Jenniks says:

    “chaimstream media” kek

    Liked by 1 person

  12. Tiberius says:

    You can bet that when the wall hits and her options are few she’ll approach him on how inappropriate it is for him to see other women, because it makes her uncomfortable and she’s his “wife”. Cue ensuing divorce rape anyway.

    Liked by 1 person

    • gunslingergregi says:

      what if she really does divorce rape him ?

      Like

      • Exurban says:

        Hey I am not a lawyer Greg, but if she gets preggers, is he not on the hook for child support? In NYS, I believe he is. It wouldn’t matter that somebody else did the deed, or that he’s gayer than a fuchsia manpurse.

        Liked by 1 person

      • gunslingergregi says:

        I think if she goes after him for it I was just told the same thing
        applies ohio children assumed had in marriage
        but my wife separated type did not try that crap
        has a dude who is father

        Like

  13. gunslingergregi says:

    and that ends up being the only sex they have
    where the fuck are the drums

    Like

  14. aleste81 says:

    “You should sleep with 25 guys before settling down”

    by Amanda Ross. Captain Obvious ?

    https://babe.net/2017/12/26/you-should-sleep-with-at-least-25-guys-before-settling-down-and-ill-tell-you-exactly-why-26107

    Like

  15. Anonymous says:

    Alpha f*cks, Beta bucks… nothing else here.

    Like

  16. gunslingergregi says:

    I am noticing that not being able to fuck at all has definitely altered the way I am treated lol
    that one bitch that wanted me to hit it is pisssssed but yea
    this other one keeps laying on bed legs open but I can’t do shit with it keeps wanting to stay night but leaves doesn’t come back cause wants me hitting it and I can’t rofl
    this shit is funny kind of
    and those are bitches I pay to blow but they mad I’m not hitting pussy like I have fucked the shit out of others
    they want validation I can’t give at moment lol its like I have been a piece of meat or something and not just loot
    I feel used he he he

    Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      .sucks when can’t live up to the legend

      Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      i’m in a weird fucking zone

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      What meds do they have you on?

      Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        ashitty one but I think ironsides made comment bout better like 6 more days of this then be off I think
        kind of interesting experiment though I guess another one in the long line

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Superman, meet Kryptonite.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        guess the great books right everybody got an Achilles heal and shit
        lol kryptonite too

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        it kind of brings life into a different perspective
        when all it takes to completely change a life is a little pill
        then wtf does that mean we really are
        some fucking chemicals and if that is the case then we don’t really have choices to make. IS that what that means?
        the chemicals at the time are making them for us.
        just like more testosterone changes how people feel and feeling is a shitton of what we are
        and if that is the case what is the point of being here try different chemicals

        Liked by 1 person

      • gunslingergregi says:

        how much as people say agency do we really have
        what actually does matter what is the base of all this shit

        Like

  17. JEB says:

    She has achieved hypergamys ultimate goal state.
    She achieves full emotional and economical control of a man whom openly acknowledges that he “has no wish to have sex with her”. All while she is having him openly explain to anyone that, while she is not fucking him, she can fuck whomever she wants.
    This is full-blown open hypergamy. I believe that we will see a lot more of this in the coming time. Betas fully acknowledging their position in the Alpha fucks / beta bucks side of hypergamy.
    There has never been a more decent time to be a fuckboy or jerkboy; women soon no longer imply that they want economical support or emotional support from you, because their top beta orbiter will have commited his life, even on a paper sanctioned by the state, to fulfill all her BB needs and expect nothing in return.

    Next step: Having betas get into voluntary sexless marriages and promise to be responsible, parentally and economically, to the offspring that his wife has made during their marriage with an unknown alpha suitor.
    Will there be men so lost in their blue pill mindset that they will accept the ultimate form of open cuckoldry? Time will tell.

    Like

  18. Mistral says:

    Please. Take a look at that guy. Those lips have tasted cock. The status symbol for UES ladies (usually older ones) is a gay male “house cat” hubby.

    Like

    • Jay in DC says:

      Yeah he has IMHO, -blatant- gayface. And my gadar is so-so at best compared to other people I know but come on man. That weirdly creepy rictus grin he has just screams he wants a blast down the throat.

      Maybe they can just have one guy as the alpha male for both of them?

      Like

  19. Libertardian says:

    O/T: https://mpcdot.com/forums/topic/8496-the-donald-trump-presidential-archive/page__st__31820#entry408602

    Here’s hoping. Also, “bugman” is too benign a term for Klein and his ilk. They’re pure evil and well aware of it.

    Like

  20. Cracker says:

    this kind of thing doesn’t surprise me at all.

    i’ve lost count of how many women i’ve talked to in recent years who say they want a relationship but don’t care about the sex or wish they could have all the perks of a relationship without the expectation of sex.

    just last week i was talking to an old classmate who i’m not interested but was playing around with for kicks.

    she was complaining about being single and how she can’t find a good man and is ready to stop looking. doesn’t want casual hookups

    i said something akin to, sure, but there’s nothing wrong with having some fun once in awhile, wink wink. everyone needs to get the pipes cleaned. she responded with, nah, i don’t even want the sex, would rather have someone i can just do dates and spend time with an not be expected to have sex with them

    there have always been women who have low sex drives or whatever but something is seriously wrong with our women these days when so many of them are like that. messed up hormones, flawed anatomy, too much cock carousel riding or whatever it is, women should want and enjoy sex. girls who are happy to have a companion with no sex life have got some serious problems. a lot of them like that too

    Liked by 2 people

    • mendo says:

      One thing the Pill does for women is it lowers their sex drive and inhibits their ability to enjoy sex.

      Combine that with carousel riding, all the boozing they do, shitty diets and yeah, they’d just want some emotional tampon to listen and deal with all their crap.

      Interestingly enough, women can and do suffer from low testosterone (is there anything T can’t fix), such that “one of the surest signs of low female testosterone is HSDD, or hypoactive sexual desire disorder, which is characterized by “persistent or recurrent deficiency or absence of sexual thoughts and fantasies and/or desire for, or receptivity for, sexual activity causing personal distress or interpersonal difficulties.”

      Liked by 3 people

    • I don’t think it has to do with low sex drive.

      I think that’s the consequence of our modern (((society))) having (((explored))) sexuality to a point that, for many, it has becoming a trivial affair, akin to putting on socks. Something that you do because you do, but there’s nothing great about it.

      In a non-sexualized society, sex is exciting because it is non-trivial, and because it can mean something more than just banging meat against meat.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        great point

        Like

      • Belle Igerent says:

        over exposure is definitely the case, but it’s likely not boredom, but horror upon recollection of some of the things she once did, how her hopes were raised on the soaring wings of orgasmic passion, then cruelly dashed on the jagged rocks of assorted uncaring alhaz, and worse yet, nihilistic beta schlubs who she desperately tossed a bone. Even if she can’t explicitly evoke these memories, and they are explicit, her subconscious warns her of the danger of ‘everyone needs a little fun, right? wink wink’ through a fugue of ennui.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        yep, you and Enfant Terrible are right on the money here.

        by their own doing these girls have ruined themselves so badly that they can no longer get the highest level of enjoyment that humans are lucky enough to experience. pure natural pleasure with a man they love.

        instead they are hollow and empty, seeing sex as nothing more than a meaningless physical activity that they have no interest in other than as a ploy to procure male attention and provisions.

        no wonder you hear so many people now saying sex isn’t important in a relationship, most important is m@rrying your best friend. they actually believe that because sex means nothing to them. how sad is that. what empty lives they must live

        Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Cracker, see whether you can move these conversations over to what all’s in their medicine cabinets, and then see whether these chicks are on SSRIs.

      If they’re aging towards The Wall, and if they’re you-go-grrlll careerists, then they’re under a tremendous amount of pressure, and they’re filled with worry & anxiety & apprehension about every-d@mned-thing, and they probably have an SSRI prescription.

      Like

    • Vagina dominator says:

      Women don’t have a clue what they want. How would she like it once she finds out she is hooked to someone who doesn’t dominate her?

      Unhaaaaaapy.

      Like

    • skorzecin150 says:

      Hate to say it bro but, just like the two in the OP, it’s probably a good thing the genes aren’t going to be passed on.

      Liked by 1 person

    • OGRE says:

      I consider it a serious mental problem when the idea of sex is repulsive to a woman. I don’t mean that she’s repulsed by her husband or any other particular individual, but in the general sense being disgusted at any sexual activity is completely at odds with how we are biologically programmed. It would be akin to being repulsed at the thought of eating food. Once shes older and menopause sets in it makes a bit more sense, but if those eggs are in the belly theres a physiological instinct to mate.

      That aside, I don’t understand this “I want a relationship but no sex” idea. Your husband wants sex, yes? I would think that as long as the spouse is not repulsive then having sex with him shouldn’t be treated as some massive imposition. You want your husband happy yes? You’d do anything for him because you love him so much? Anything, except let him put his penis in your vagina 3 times a week…

      Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        yeah

        a woman should want to please her man and do what she can to make him happy. any woman who doesn’t should be kicked to the curb. but she should also want to have sex with him even when he’s not asking

        if a girl is giving you sex mostly or only to make you happy, and not because she is genuinely attracted to you and wants it too, there are some underlying problems that need to be addressed.

        scenarios where girls give it up for their men when their hearts aren’t really in it, will only lead to resentment, cheating, leaving, etc.

        Like

  21. Xtrabeing (starofmagic.wordpress.com) says:

    I still argue you can rev up a woman’s sex drive, and with masculine sexuality rather than Game. Game will take you only so far (I know this is heresy, but I don’t care. I accept parts of it will work for different men, but I disagree with parts like you can’t have emotions. I have plenty of emotions and I work well with females — very well.)

    Masculine sexuality is far different from the Internet concept of “Game.” And far better, baby — bet on it.

    What’s game? If you don’t know, it’s pushing the robot buttons of girls so that they behave (roughly — but only roughly) like you like. You do things like “flip the script,” finding ways to get the girl chase you, “neg” her with backhanded compliments like saying her shoes are nice like your grandmas, and be aloof and unemotional.

    I’m not saying it’s all wrong. But it’s a lot of work and it’s built, largely, on a fake foundation. The saying “fake it till you make it” emphasizes this latter point, it being an artificial way of living that stretches one’s comfort level so often.

    Masculine sexuality is being a sexual god with the capacity (maybe) for love being an add-on feature. (Not to be too geeky anal, the way Game enthusiasts always are.) In this edition, the love is the fakery, but the sexuality is the real frisson that electrifies relations between you and her. And you don’t even have to be a beautiful male like me (though it helps).

    One illustration shows all about masculine sexuality. I was lounging in a park in Vancouver, Canada, with two guy friends and a girl —

    [continues:]

    Masculine Sexuality in detail

    Like

  22. Anonymous says:

    His digit ratio is all wrong…

    Like

  23. BRUH says:

    IF HE GAY THEN YO INCEL STUFF AT THA TOP IS BULLSHIT LOL

    [CH: GOTTA COVER THE BASES BRUH. IT’S CALLED BEING CONSCIENTIOUS SOMETHING YOU NIGS WOULDN’T UNDERSTAND]

    Like

  24. LeShitlourde says:

    I can’t even conjecture as to what their motivations are. It is best to just laugh and go on being normal and being happy you had parents who had instincts.

    Like

  25. Oswald Spengler says:

    Like

  26. Johnny Redux says:

    First – The female offspring of Trump are all leftarded losers. The males received the good genes, for sure.

    Second – A sexless marriage, in many (if not most) cases, is the result of a man marrying a woman his own age, and after time losing all sexual interest in her as she quickly morphs into an old woman before his eyes, much quicker than he is aging.

    Like

  27. Dale Force says:

    I read once about a hollywood starlet who had a marriage like that, although the guy lived in Japan. They used the marriage as an excuse to blow off partners who wanted committment (I am already married)

    Like

  28. Johnny Redux says:

    “Once you’ve got everything else in place, it is like the cherry on top.” – yeah, I do enjoy a woman in that position. Takes some effort on her part, though.

    Liked by 1 person

  29. A.B. Prosper says:

    I’m not married, happy to be not in a relationship or out on the hunt but that, that is repulsive .

    Like

  30. bigjohn33 says:

    The guy is gay. He said they had been best friends since they were kids. A boy’s best friend is not ever a girl. Unless he’s gay. No straight kid I knew growing up had female friends much less a “best friend” and if he did he got teased mercilessly until it ended. Likewise all the boys that ended up gay had friends that were girls that protected them from the bullies. The dude is gay.

    Like

  31. Oswald Spengler says:

    The groom looks like a cross between Perez Hilton and The Joker.

    Like

  32. tteclod says:

    Hi! I’m back.

    2 thoughts

    he’s gay, she has the thousand-cock stare – then I read you concur – oh well

    in a sane world, the man would face prosecution for fraud in application for a marriage license, forfeit all his assets to the state, & be promptly hanged behind the courthouse

    such a woman would do better to offer perpetual cock service to a lonely man with reliable income – he’d (financially) appreciate her & she might save something back for those post-wall years preceding self-deliverance – if she offered birthing children to the arrangement, she’d have a reason to live past 60

    ok, that’s 3

    Like

  33. cortesar says:

    If somebody asks you what is poetic justice

    Like

  34. cynthia says:

    What happens when she inevitably gets pregnant? What becomes of the child? Who does that child call Daddy? Is her gay bestie hubby now on hook for child support when they inevitably get divorced?

    Like

    • jOHN MOSBY says:

      Previous comment was gassed,obviously . It looks like she’s already got Tyrone Jr. in the oven, look at the placement of the froots hand on that tummy.

      Liked by 1 person

    • bigjohn33 says:

      She’s going to have kids. That’s the whole point. The soul mate stuff is a ruse. By openly declaring the platonicity of their marriage she is signalling not very subtly it is ok to have unprotected sex with her. The kids will probably be ok if gay dad doesn’t molest them (he probably will). Yes, when she divorces him he’ll pay child support .

      Like

      • bigjohn33 says:

        He’ll be the “dad”. His name will be on the birth certificate. Biological dad won’t know or probably care.

        Like

      • Dave says:

        If his “wife” catches him molesting the kid and divorces him, he can laugh it off, because either he gets away with child molestation or he gets away with not paying child support. What’s prison but free food, free lodging, and gay sex on tap 24/7? (hope you like it rough!)

        Like

    • OGRE says:

      In most states the husband is the presumed father unless either one says otherwise. If at the time of birth (with a brief window thereafter) the male says he is not the father then he can pursue a challenge to paternity. But if he assumes the role of the childs father even knowing that he is not the biological father then he can be held responsible for child support even if he wishes to challenge it later. You can’t knowingly take on that mantle then seek to shrug it off later. Best interest of the child and all that…

      The real problem is when he is misled into believing he is the father then finds out later that he is not, and some states have been real shitty about keeping these poor cuckolds on the hook for child support.

      Liked by 1 person

  35. cortesar says:

    do you have a repugnant European DNA you filthy goys

    https://twitter.com/westland_will/status/953914680308740096

    Like

    • cortesar says:

      tweet was shoahed at real time while I was posting
      here is another one

      > Be a Jewish woman.> Critique a goy for posting his DNA results as “repugnant” because there’s no evidence of mixing with non-Whites.> Post your own DNA result as your Twitter header image, signalling your Jewish pride. pic.twitter.com/aOU31T3d25

      — Joyce (@TOQJoyce) January 18, 2018

      Like

  36. JR says:

    “was this spur of the moment? yes. but we have talked about this for 10 years”

    Zeno’s Hamsterization paradox: It’s spur of the moment when you decide to decide to decide to decide to decide to decide to………………

    Liked by 1 person

    • Cracker says:

      that spur of the moment comment made me think too

      there may be exceptions to the rule but statistically something like 80% of courthouse and vegas weddings end in d1vorce. double the d1vorce rate of traditional church w3ddings

      surely a variety of reasons for that but mostly it’s because they get married for the wrong reasons.

      people who do it usually have instability and problems in their lives and/or relationship and think they’ll get a fresh new start by getting m@rried.

      or even more often, one or both is questioning whether or not they should stay in the relationship. probably deep down they know it should end but then decide to make one last ditch effort to save it by getting m@rried. same idea when unhappy couples have k1ds in an attempt to salvage things.

      no way these two will stay m@rried long term.

      Like

  37. Man I was going through old CH posts from like 2013. The comment section here used to be full of faggot cucks lol. Quoiting the “law of (((Moses))) and shit. Even had a dindu bitch named Nicole commenting here. Guess they fucked off. The current commenters are a lot better.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. GB says:

    So now fags publicly declare their beards as a beard. Progressive. One thing I don’t get is she takes a smv hit for this stunt no matter the motivation. She must be cocking out hard to not realize that. I wish them godspeed on their future journey through the divorce industrial complex tunnel of love.

    Liked by 1 person

  39. rocko says:

    Apparently Ivanka Trump is not the only one with weird leftist tendencies. And because Tiffany Trump is definitely not the prettier one of the two (and I’m basing it on no weird Oedipal pics or comments involving her and daddy Donald Trump), I think she might end up just like her friends.

    Like

  40. Silk_heresy says:

    So what happens to this sham of a marriage when one of the partners loses their job? Is a man who has to pay all the bills but gets none of the sexual benefits going to continually carry her? A low smv straight man certainly would to a point and a gay man might for a while. But a beta man might be pushed just a little too far, especially if his smv rises or falls less precipitously compared to hers.

    Like

  41. tsotha says:

    So now fags publicly declare their beards as a beard.

    That was my take: Eh… those “other people” the husband is dating wouldn’t happen to have a twig and berries, would they?

    Like

  42. unh says:

    At my peak of hedonistic activities there was nothing like coming across a 30-something out of a sexless marriage. Man, were they good at doing ANYTHING and EVERYTHING they were commanded to do – to make up for ‘lost time.’

    Like

  43. baked georgia says:

    this movie idiocracy have a quite interessing story. they, obviously, avoided any race reference. but it’s an allegory to “the bell curve”, mixed with the fertility rate by country and race, but from a hollywood comedy

    Like

    • Vagina dominator says:

      Idiocracy is an anti-white-goy-male movie actually.

      It should be about how society is being dumbed down by whores, nigs, beaners manipulated by kikes but for some strange reason all the really stupid ones are white males. And no reason why it is happening.

      (((Hard to explain.)))

      Like

      • baked georgia says:

        if it was such a anti-white movie then hollywood wouldnt had try to shadow banned it.

        while the race of each character isnt to your liking, the movie is almost pro eugenics. the more dumber people, the worse the country (and world) becomes.

        it just happens that dumber people are from haiti, while smarter people are from norway. but that’s just a cohencidence, of course

        Like

  44. So when this slut runs around and gets preggars with some Groid’s spawn, will gay-face boi-in-the-soy be responsible for child support? It is routine that husbands support the spawn of other men when their wives cheat. Is there a marker in this arrangement for the children this slut is going to have?

    Like

  45. Baron dallier says:

    “Susan Pease Gadoua, a licensed therapist

    Licensed to bilk.”
    Absolute Shakesperarian gold.
    The Baron

    Like

  46. The snap pack of rich New York socialites. It seems the bride went out of her way to publicly humiliate her new husband, perhaps she gets off on doing stuff like that. Usually, a self-respecting person keeps their business private and weird stuff on the down low. But not only does she expose herself to her friends and family, but it looks like she is bragging about it, and trying to get as much publicity and notoriety as possible.

    The woman proudly claims that her new husband has never touched her and nor will he be allowed to for the foreseeable future. She then goes on to boast that she has no attention of curbing her social and sex life outside of her marriage. I guess poor hubby having been completely embarrassed by making his private life public to all his friends, past, present, and future, a laughing stock at work, assuming these socialites actually do work, that is questionable if they are even capable of doing so, and in the eyes of his poor parents and relatives. I guess he is being trained to be her servant as he will be in a constant state of denial as her sexy wife flaunts her stuff and teases him as she relishes all about her hot boyfriend and their sexual escapades.

    Hubby will learn to be a good postmodern feminist male husband by first doing all the chores in the house, learn to please, expect that the wife’s wishes, education, comfort and sex life come first.
    He will devote all his energies, funds to fulfilling her goals. Serving her well is his only reward.

    Like

  47. Jay in DC says:

    Related: Out of morbid curiosity for the first time ever I signed up for Tinder in the DC area because a friend of mine was saying how fucking insane it was, I had to see this shit for myself.

    And he was 100% on point. I have determined the following: Women in DC (and I’m guessing every major blue city) are truly living in an alternate reality.

    The sheer amount of women in the mid 30 to early 40s saying: No kids but someday… was YUGE. It is like the have no conceptualization of the biological reality of their situation. You aren’t 28 dummy, you are 38, da fuq?

    Then the next thing I noticed is, we are basically in a soft civil war at this point. There is no denying it. I swiped about 200-300 profiles I think just to get a good statistical baseline on my little experiment. Every 5th profile: Trump supporter? Swipe left. Trump Deragement Syndrome is real. These people are fucking insane and beyond redemption. What to do about it?

    I also noticed the sheer amount of 5 to 7s that were posting like 8 to 10s in their requirements. This is DC, so I’m use to this inflated and comical self-worth by fatties and chubster w/ a degree and a paper pushing job but it seems to have metastasized quite a bit.

    The only positive thing is that about every 20th profile was a thin or fit girl. If you want to call that a positive. So you have a 1 in 20 chance if you are Brad Pitt and Bill Gates wrapped into one. LOL. What a fucking shit show. I really weep for young men these days and our society as a whole. We are lost.

    Like

    • DC was a mating toilet starting about 2005-ish. The mating, err, dating services had all tapped out to the delusional 3-6 set with far too many demands for their worth. Match.com was a smorgasbord of pretty decent chicks when it start in the nineties, but rapidly went to hell and of course, it was then that Washington women went full-on ham planet. And of course the region went dark, very dark, very diverse. My old go-to for a new source when I got sick of the old once was church-chicks, except these days, they’re all run by severely feminist ‘ministers’ and even the husbands have to sit and listen to them sermonize on how shitty men and fathers are, so now, churches, out. Even my last name doesn’t carry much weight in a church in these troubled (for young men) times. There’s only one way to find a decent chick, young, unspoiled, step one being, JayBird, get outta DC. Me, I went to Boston and found the chicks friendlier and skinnier if with a slightly annoying accent. My tone is Brooklyn, but even nine years in up here now, no Bahston accent.

      Like

    • Who_Knows says:

      Jay in DC, can you post examples: pics etc. Or, is that too risky?

      The one time I used Tinder was at a friend’s place–his profile. Saw about 100-150 girls. Only about 3 were worth a second look. Do hot girls stay away from such things?

      Like

      • Hot girls don’t NEED such things.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Jay in DC says:

        If I gave even half a fuck, I wouldn’t do it but by what methodology would one of these entitled cunts trace any pic dump back to me?

        I may do this, but I’m wondering if here is the right place on this sub-thread. It almost warrants a new post or maybe a column? CH? I don’t want to get the proprietor into shit because they COULD fuck him up over it. Me? Not so much…

        But as they say a pic is worth a 1000 words and it would be a fascinating case study in the alternate reality these DC bitches currently dwell in. I can do a whole write up on this CH w/ damning profile evidence or I can just keep it on the D/L here or in another comment.

        I feel like it would be a very good thing for people to see and understand either way.

        -Jay

        Like

      • Jay in DC says:

        Here is just one example among manifold. There were dozens like this including one holding a “feminists FUCK better” sign. Nothing says bring her home to mom more than that, innit?

        As for this sad sack below, once again my finger was jumping in excitement for a right swipe because nothing says fun, laid-back, cool, drama-free, party girl like militant political activism. (name blocked to protect the guilty)

        They truly think these are metrics that would ATTRACT men, even shitlib men who would likely be afraid of getting ganked with a #metoo accusation. Like I said… lost society.

        https://imgur.com/a/SRaar

        Like

    • chris says:

      I think 80% of DC went for Hillary.

      Like

    • Oleaginous Outrager says:

      “The sheer amount of women in the mid 30 to early 40s saying: No kids but someday… was YUGE. ”

      I had to get a haircut, and there was nothing else to read while I waited, so I leafed through one of the execrable “celebrity” mags that ladies like so bad. There were 5 pages of “baby news”, and not one of the women featured was under 30, and only two were under 36.

      This sort of absurd propaganda is everywhere, and like the best propaganda, it feeds on and into the most basic insecurities of the target.

      Like

  48. Fredrik Sørgard Johnsen says:

    Beta of the year or what? I remember the good old golden truth gem of the CH maxim; “Married men without children are beta by default” Then what does this make him? Its creepy to read about and to know that people like this exist in reality. Send chills down my spine. How low can you sink? Where is his dad in this hour? Personally I would prefer my son to sit at home whacking off to cosplay(cartoon porn with a robot doll in the closet than this.f

    Like

  49. chris says:

    If she gets impregnated buy another male, this man may be legally considered the father and obligated to pay child support for the child due to the woman being his wife and the pregnancy occurring during the marriage. (Depending on jurisdiction of course.) The guy is an idiot.

    Like

  50. Woke Bigly says:

    Would bang the crazy bride though.

    Like

    • At least she’s bringing in a little money. Probably can’t get a better job right away after being at home for five years. What happened to her side business?

      Like

    • skorzecin150 says:

      The info contained in the guy’s post explains exactly why he was divorce raped. Not just the content, but the tone.

      I feel sorry for the guy, but it looks like he did everything he could for her – and it wasn’t enough. It was never going to be.

      Anyone who spends five minutes here wouldn’t be surprised at the outcome of the m@rriage.

      Like

  51. Waffles says:

    Marriage has peaked. Within the past 15 years it has become reality show fodder (Bachelor, Married at First Sight, 90 Day Fiance, anyone remember the gem Joe Millionaire? That one could be an entire CH article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Millionaire). Not to even mention the Wedding Industrial Complex that has people taking out mortgage sized loans for that “special day” which isn’t that special because every wedding I have been to has been pretty much the exact. same. thing. And ended mostly the exact. same. way. Divorce. It’s not about the vows or bond, it’s not even about the groom. It’s about the dress and photos and mason jar cocktails and women celebrating the marriage milestone so they can move along to the divorce milestone and the “living my best life” milestone, which is pretty much a second round of the carousel with a higher weight limit. The man is a pawn in all of this, just another accessory. This basically confirms it and cuts out the nonsense.

    Like

  52. […] post “The Voluntarily Sexless Marriage,” dated 18 January 2018, by Château Heartiste obliquely confirms, no doubt more palatably for […]

    Like

  53. Ralph Stanley says:

    A good line from a (ahem) Woody Allen film, “Once the sex goes, it all goes.”

    Most married men with kids have to bug their wives for sex (or proactively plan for it), the majority of the time. Having children in the house ups the fatigue factor to heights single people can’t imagine. But wives know they can’t shirk that duty outright.

    A sexless marriage? It’s an absolute tragedy. I’m sorry, but it can’t all be restaurant dates, Netflix, and trips to the zoo. Banging is how you reconnect and reestablish your closeness on a primal level.

    Liked by 1 person

  54. Dan the man says:

    So she married her number 1 beta orbiter. This way he’ll always be around to pick up the pieces when Chad stops fucking her for a younger hotter tighter bird. Then when the “Wall Reaper ” comes to extract his vengence on this unholy thot, beta man will be trapped with this soul sucking vampire until he finally gets a divorce, ends up broke and alone at 50.

    Like

  55. Jack Daw says:

    An insecure gay man pressured his BFF into marrying him so that he didn’t have to come out to his mom. She agreed because she’s pushing 30 and still single, and no combination of wine and Valium can stop the sobbing anymore. These are the new heroes of the progressive, post-values age.

    Like

Leave a Reply