Physiognomy is roaring back as a legitimate field of research. Will phrenology soon follow a similar path to realtalk respectability?
We CAN judge a book by its cover. We can tell with a quick glance at a person’s face who is prone to criminality, who is stupid or smart, who is a cad or a slut, and who is rich or poor.
A new study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology posits there’s a good chance you can tell if someone is rich or poor just by looking at them.
“The relationship between well-being and social class has been demonstrated by previous research,” R. Thora Bjornsdottir, a graduate student at the University of Toronto and co-author of the study, tells CNBC Make It. In general, people with money tend to live happier, less anxious lives compared to those struggling to make ends meet. She and her team demonstrated “that these well-being differences are actually reflected in people’s faces.”
Bjornsdottir and her co-author, psychology professor Nicholas O. Rule, had undergraduate subjects of various ethnicities look at gray-scale photographs of 80 white males and 80 white females. None showed any tattoos or piercings. Half of the photos were of people who made over $150,000 a year, which they designated as upper class, and the other half were people who made under $35,000, or working class.
When the subjects were asked to guess the class of the people in the photos, they did so correctly 68 percent of the time, significantly higher than random chance.
Surprisingly, researchers co-discovered people can tell which Whites live around blacks; they never look relaxed.
The effect is “likely due to emotion patterns becoming etched into their faces over time,” says Bjornsdottir. The chronic contraction of certain muscles can actually lead to changes in the structure of your face that others can pick up on, even if they aren’t aware of it. […]
“Over time, your face comes to permanently reflect and reveal your experiences,” Rule told the University of Toronto. “Even when we think we’re not expressing something, relics of those emotions are still there.”
We age into the face we deserve — a fairly conventional bit of wisdom that has a big kernel of scientific validity. Related, it’s the reason why successful womanizers have that “unperturbed and in charge look” which seems to exert a preternatural pull on women, and why incels aging into bottled up, scrunched up, constipated faces push women away, regardless of baseline facial attractiveness. A satiated cad walks into a roomful of Betties pre-radiating a glow of unflappable confidence and libidinal fulfillment, and it’s all the women can do to control their curiosity. I.e., the hungry dog is the last to get fed.
CNBC, like most leftoid outfits, chooses to interpret the findings of this Narrative-exploding research with a rhetorical dissembling that would spare their blank slate-committed egos.
“That’s a reminder that snap judgments can have real consequences, and contribute to the cycle of poverty” — CNBC, dribbling typical shitlib boilerplate.
Realtruth: “That’s a reminder that snap judgments are based on concrete biological cues of human worth, and can contribute to efficiently filtering people for purposes of association.”
Physiognomy doesn’t create poor people, shitlibs. Physiognomy notices who is likely to have the inherent characteristics that predispose to poverty.
It’s that NOTICING which really bugs shitlibs. They hate that a reality exists that constantly makes mockery of their antiquated religious orthodoxy.
Florida nurse, unmarried and childless, adopts two black twins from the hospital. Now guess, is she nurse white, Latina or black? Oh, you know already.
Hamm first met Delilah in the pediatric intensive care unit, where she was brought in for a fractured skull, broken bones, and extreme malnourishment. It is unclear what happened to the girls’ biological parents.
“My heart was broken,” Hamm told CBS 47 about the girl’s condition. “She was just so lifeless, but she still held on to my finger.”
She … she held onto my finger!
Hamm adopted both girls, who have shown significant improvement and development.
“They’ve been through so much,” Hamm shared. “They’re completely different kids. If you had met them when I met them you’d be amazed.
“I hope when people hear my story it opens them up to the possibilities of adopting,” added the new mother of two.
How about opening them up to the reality that violence and trauma will always follow this race around like the stats on a Pokemon card? Enjoy being beaten by your two adopted daughters and their boyfriends in your old age as they steal your table lamp.
LikeLiked by 1 person
We can but hope.
If you burn the coal, in whatever form, you pay the toll.
LikeLiked by 1 person
“I hope when people hear my story it opens them up to the possibilities of adopting,” added the new mother of two.
I think we can all agree: this is one time she should have gone with a cat.
LikeLiked by 1 person
No, no, no you nazi bigot…The Violence merely plagues and besieges blacks, they are not, like, the cause of it or anything.
LikeLike
Easy, just go to your nearest Wal-Mart. You can easily tell apart your decent citizens from your rednecks, beaners, and niggers who will always stay poor and filthy. You can tell by the number of tats, the pants halfway down their ass, the saggy tits, the vulgar language, the uncontrollable children, etc. And the U always congregate regardless of race. In fact, these are the people most prone to mix sexually. And it’s especially true of the women, but particularly white women. At times I can’t tell if the skank white trash woman in front of me is either a Trump deplorable or a Hillary nasty woman.
LikeLike
Young men and boys with washboard foreheads. What kind of homelife worry produces that?
LikeLike
even better : physio based on skull.
Can you tell the white skull from the black skull ?
LikeLiked by 1 person
lol. Is that Homo Erectus?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Apes evolved from ni&&ers.
LikeLike
Gorilla society certainly is more evolved than “human” african society. Who’s family unit is more stable? The below is complete with ebonic commentary…
LikeLike
Different species.
LikeLike
If these had been found in an archaeological dig, they would not have been considered the same species. Skull with the big brain cavity on the left is the advanced human. That is a big difference in brain capacity when shown that way- probably 20% which corresponds with IQ.
LikeLike
Right skull has shape of typical pavement ape. Note significant reduction of cranium capacity in the prefrontal cortex, the source of executive function, planning, and logic.
If a Darwinist ignorant of DNA observed a Norwegian and a Nigerian side-by-side for the first time, he would declare them different species. Only a DNA test would prove him wrong.
Darwinists to this day still make this error, and even animals that can mate and produce fertile offspring, such as the spotted owl and barred owl, are declared different species.
LikeLike
Only a DNA test would prove him wrong.
But would it prove him wrong?
What’s the quantified difference between a Bantu and a Finn, versus the quantified difference between a two other animals that can produce fertile offspring, such as a brown and polar or those two owls.
Can a Bantu and a Finn even produce fertile offspring, if not for the civilizational superstructure courtesy of Mr White? (that’s rhetorical — let’s not find out)
LikeLike
This is an argument that can be put to good use in the discourse.
That the “human super species” needs some biological re-evaluation.
At Age of Treason was an interesting comment, that in biology it is become a common observation, an axiom even, that skin color is a or the foremost hallmark of speciation.
If this is true and current science, well let us bring it to light.
Intelligent liberals want to be thought of as intelligent, and if we can bring in these appealing and undeniable red pill science facts, then yay.
LikeLike
A Finn and a Pygmy only have viable offspring, courtesy of the superstructure provided by Mr Finn.
In the jungle the hybrid would not do well, and of course up north the half-breed would be doomed.
It is only the habitat created by Mr White that allows for hybridization.
LikeLike
A DNA test would prove him wrong? WTF?
There are species of wolves, giraffes, lions, and other animals that are closer in DNA to each other than niggers and humans and they are considered different species.
LikeLiked by 1 person
* Correction necessary for the mother jumpin science term in play,
At Age of Treason was an interesting comment, that in biology it is become a common observation, an axiom even, that
skinbody color is a foremost hallmark of speciation.LikeLike
ZOMG HATE FACTS
LikeLike
[…] Physiognomy Is Real (Wealth) […]
LikeLike
Gheydar is a real thing based on life-learned physiognomy.
LikeLike
Guess the personality?
[CH: she banged one of her students or she cut off her husband’s dick. did i win?]
LikeLiked by 3 people
Both?
LikeLiked by 1 person
She starred in a string of crappy movies and wound up with some clown named Aston and permanent bitch face?
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s the first one, CH. Husband has already left in one piece.
LikeLike
Not to go all Greg Eliot, but does not that bitch look part Cherokee?
Her face is classic Oklahoma half breed. The hair is a good clue as well.
LikeLike
In Britain you really notice the difference physically between the richer classes and the poorer ones, anyone who has walked in an area like Chelsea or Islington in London and then walked in a much poorer place in Britain like Wigan or Wolverhampton will notice straight away the differences in the population. Rich people are usually blonder, taller and of course slimmer and less pale looking than the working classes. This difference I believe is largely to do with the Norman conquest when thousands of French Vikings settled in the south east of England, even today someone with a surname like Darcy, Mandeville or Seymour is more likely to be rich than someone with a native English Saxon or occupational name like Cooper. Just goes to show that the richer classes have largely kept to themselves for nearly a thousand years.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2011/apr/03/social-mobility-britain-aristocracy
LikeLiked by 3 people
“Blonder AND less pale looking” rarely go together in nature. Hair dye and/or fake tans/sunbathing vacations just might be factors.
LikeLike
You do in TN as well…picked up a car there once to drive back to DC. Had my kids with me. Small town between knox and nash and I was honestly worried that the people there might eat us. We were too symmetrical and goodlooking to be locals.
In Africa, they would eat people like that.
LikeLike
And Dr. Zaius said,”Man built towers that reached the clouds, planes that flew above them and built rockets that flew to space, but the niggers made a wasteland of it. The lucky ones reached the stars taking happy simians with them since they still had hope, but we unlucky ones had to deal with the niggers left behind. Oh they tried to reach space, with their catapults and standing on each other, but as we got smarter and began to evolve the niggers were lazy and stayed the same. Finally we rediscovered man’s technology, under a pile of faded porno magazines and a smelly pile of feces from the niggers. We read the books that the niggers left lying in the weeds and tall grass that overgrew the ancient libraries, and we learned of man. The unkindest cut of all was the computer logs at Facebook and Google where man compared apes to niggers. We were all appalled. We knew what a humiliating thing that was. Why, Taylor? Why?”
Colonel Taylor looked at the mute woman in a fur bikini and with a sigh said at last,”Martin Looter Kang.”
The mute woman looking hot with sweat rolling down her firm young breasts said nothing. That was worth the trip through time and space alone.
A tear fell down Colonel Taylor’s cheek. He had come home. These damn dirty apes had a reason to be angry and treat him badly.
A sign sagged and waved dully in the wind. Martin Looter Kang Boulevard.
LikeLike
Is this another SaucyQueer sock puppy?
Rhetorical.
LikeLike
Story is BS…niggers could never build a catapult.
LikeLike
CNN talks about snap judgments as if they were a bad thing…in the natural world, they are the difference between life and death.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Blink!
LikeLike
“We can tell with a quick glance at a person’s face who is prone to criminality, who is stupid or smart, who is a cad or a slut, and who is rich or poor”
80% on Jews…
LikeLike
80 per cent is a good jewdar.
Just watch out for the remaining 20.
LikeLike
Soy face (a.k.a., “gloryhole face,” beta face, etc.):
LikeLike
I have an instinctive revulsion when I see “men” doing that.
Please, make it stop.
Soy face, not even once.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yeah wtf is that shit all about? They look like idiots…like fags.
LikeLike
The one on the left looks like a gaping hippo. With similar oral hygiene. That mouth does not look healthy.
Are these weaklings in the “entertainment” industry? I say that bcs there are plenty of types who think that this is some kind of “clowning” with the face pulling and so on. With clowning in any case being absolutely the lowest form of humor.
Is that it? Are they offering us laughs and fun? Is that the goal? Or is this just some kind of mental illness, like Tourettes with face-pulling?
Unattractive, unattractive, nervous men. What is their socio-sexual rank? Are they 2s or do they just smell like 2s?
LikeLiked by 2 people
Good observation re gaping hippo. It is as if he is trying to unleash the inner animal, and what comes out.
The guy on the right, for all his soyface, is more relaxed. If he can lose the weight, the glasses and the stupid college style sweatshirt, perhaps he can step up.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The first wedge of the egalitarians into the western mind set was the meme ‘You can’t judge a book by it’s cover…’…Yes, you can. That’s why books have covers, to let you know what’s on the inside.
It’s amazing how these concepts like weeds manage to infest a mind and crowd out common sense. Now if we could only reclaim Christianity by looking at the meme ‘Jesus loves the little children…’
LikeLiked by 1 person
You can’t judge the book by its cover, but you can figure out the subject. And its intended readership.
Also, before we deconstruct which little children Jesus loves, we must first take back the definition of “love”.
LikeLike
Not ALL children, then?
LikeLike
Slightly off topic, but the study’s use of 150,000 as the cutoff for upper class is hilariously off the mark. It was probably last that low in like 1980. 150,000 won’t even put you in upper middle class today. It would if both spouses made 150,000 each. And really, the actual definition of upper class is to be unreliant on any sort of job-based income at all. Jobs can always end, and if you need that income then you’ll be just as wiped out by job loss if you make 20k a year or 1 million. Having sufficient wealth independent of a job is the real sign of upper class.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Yeah. John Greer for all his problems made some good observations, including re class. He separated class into four categories.
The Underclass dependent on welfare etc
The Wage class working for hours
Salaried class
And the Investment class
Which are you, you worthless piece of shit nobody? — oh sorry, did I say that out loud.
LikeLike
This is true but these days 150 grand a year puts you in the top 10%
LikeLike
So how do we teach our kids physiognomy? Are there textbooks for that? It’s life or death in many cases. Did it ever used to be actually taught? Just curious..
LikeLike
So how do we teach our kids physiognomy?
Generally speaking, interacting with “other people” does the trick.
Try it out and see how it goes!
LikeLike
Otherwise, we might could provide a Field Manual, a la Peterson’s wildlife guides.
However, in recognizing and dealing with human forms shapes and faces, one needs to be a bit more quicker and on the ball and not have time to be consulting. Especially in the business world!
Generally speaking, watch out for the black form hominids. The brown form is a little less sketchy, but that’s not saying much.
The olive form runs the gamut to piece of shit all the way up to top notch.
Most troublesome is the “viceroy” white, which is sometimes betrayed by its nose and especially voice but sometimes not.
LikeLike
Rewatched Jaws recently on a whim. After years of honing the Jewdar, it’s remarkable how much the (((tribal))) member of the Orca’s ‘crew’ stands out as different from the two whites on the boat. It’s clearly visible in his appearance, but the voice is the leading indicator, even more so than his puffy features and curly hair.
The (((eskimo))) was so vocally apparent that it seemed like the flick should have been called “Jews” at times.
LikeLike
Richard Dreyfus was always a “jew’s jew”… laughable when they tried to put him in a romantic lead, but he’s always serviceable as “the schmart one” in any scenario, or the means-well-but-is-tormented-by-whatever average schmoe.
As you say, even if you never saw his phiz, that vocal intonation is (((unmistakable))).
Same with Dustin Hoffman,,, laughable “stars” on the silver screen.
LikeLike
Why nor just simplify it?
Bl@ck = criminal
Shitskin = criminal
Stupid = see above
Rich = (((hook nose)))
Slut = old white libchick
LikeLike
Don’t forget young sluts. (Save the sluts!)
LikeLike
This theory doesn’t work on jews. The richest of them all are the happy merchant meme, bearded orthodox slobs.
They don’t work. They only read the talmud all day.
Question: what is the source of their wealth.
I think it has to do with controlling the printing of money and the diamond and gold trades.
LikeLike
the richest jews are not orthodox
LikeLike
Jews were not included in this study because by any sane metric they would be assumed to be the bottom of the barrel. Something like George Soros would have probably broken their testing equipment.
LikeLike