Feed on
Posts
Comments

Current Year ¡SCIENCE! is continually affirming CH maxims about the sexes, but even old timey trustworthy science, from before the SJW and femcunt infestation warped the scientific method, clairvoyantly strokes the Heartiste ego.

From a 1987 research paper, a finding that should crush the spirits of sex equalists and Game denialists (h/t Mr. Roboto):

Dominance and Heterosexual Attraction

Four experiments examined the relation between behavioral expressions of dominance and the heterosexual attractiveness of males and females. Predictions concerning the relation between dominance and heterosexual attraction were derived from a consideration of sex role norms and from the comparative biological literature. All four experiments indicated an interaction between dominance and sex of target. Dominance behavior increased the attractiveness of males, but had no effect on the attractiveness of females. The third study indicated that the effect did not depend on the sex of the rater or on the sex of those with whom the dominant target interacted. The fourth study showed that the effect was specific to dominance as an independent variable and did not occur for related constructs (aggressive or domineering). This study also found that manipulated dominance enhanced only a male’s sexual attractiveness and not his general Usability. The results were discussed in terms of potential biological and cultural causal mechanisms.

It wasn’t that long ago that scientists were ballsy and fearless exposers of ugly truths. These mid-20th Century studies are a gold mine for realtalk unpolluted by political cowardice and libshit sophistry. 1987 was probably near the last year these brutally shivtastic studies made it past the Narrative enforcers.

Descriptions of traditional female role expectations either omit dominance as a relevant dimension or suggest that low dominance is an aspect of the feminine role. For instance, Broverman, Broverman, Clarkson, Rosenkrantz, and Vogel (1970) found that clinical professionals viewed the healthy woman as submissive and not competitive. The empirical literature on normative behavior for males and females thus suggests that striving for dominance and success (ascending a social hierarchy) is typically demanded of males and is frequently proscribed for females.

Submissive wife, happy life.

Although females do compete for positions in status hierarchies, there is no available evidence to suggest that their achieved dominance or rank is positively related to their attractiveness to males.

This is borne out by personal observation. Mean Girls is orthogonal to female attractiveness to men. Women compete intrasexually primarily as a means of securing social favors from other women when they need them (for example, after childbirth). This is in stark contrast to men, who compete in dominance hierarchies to unlock a higher PUSSY POUNDER achievement level.

I read through the study to see if the authors properly defined what they meant by “dominance”. Luckily, they have: the term as they use it means PSYCHOSOCIAL DOMINANCE, aka GAME, and all that entails, including alpha and beta male body language and conversational nuances. Quote:

Dominance gestures in the performance were derived from criteria published by Mehrabian (1969). In the low-dominance condition, a constant male (CM) is shown seated at a desk in an office. An actor enters the room and chooses a chair near the door approximately 6 ft (2 m) from the desk of the CM. The actor, clutching a sheath of papers, aits in symmetrical posture, leans slightly forward with head partially bowed, and alternately looks down at the floor and up at the CM, During an ensuing discussion, the actor engages in repetitive head nodding and lets the CM engage in longer communications.

In the high-dominance condition, the actor enters, chooses a chair closer to the CM and sits in a relaxed, asymetrical posture. The actor’s hands and legs are relaxed and his body is leaning slightly backward in the chair. During the discussion, the actor produced higher rates of gesturing and lower rates of head nodding than in the low-dominance condition. Identical films were made with actresses playing all roles. Within each sex, the same actor or actress played both dominant and nondominant roles.

Does psychosocial dominance REDUCE female attractiveness to men? It would appear it does, a little at least (and it certainly doesn’t help women with men):

Female target persons in both Experiments 1 and 2 were in a context where dominance was displayed only toward other females. Perhaps a somewhat different picture might have emerged had subjects rated females who were dominant over males, indicating that it is in competition with males where females violate the normative expectations that they be submissive and noncompetitive (Broverman et al., 1970; Broverman, Vogel, Broverman, Clarkson, & Rosenkrantz, 1972), and it is only in this case that their attractiveness suffers. A third experiment was conducted to examine this possibility. […]

If the dominance manipulation had a differential effect on the female target’s attractiveness when she was in competition with men (as opposed to women), this would have shown up as a Sex of Target Person x Dominance x Sex of Opponent interaction. This interaction yielded F values of less than 1 for both variables. The higher order interaction, sex of target person by dominance by sex of opponent by sex of subject, likewise yielded an F of less than 1 for the sexual-attractiveness item and an f[l, 199)= 1.33 for the dating-desirability rating. [ed: see Table 3 at the link]

The fourth experiment in the research paper is the most interesting. It found that psychosocial dominance, but NOT aggressiveness or a domineering attitude (aka try-hard douchebaggery), was the key to increased male sexual attractiveness to women:

Manipulation of the level within the aggressive and domineering cells produced no differential effects on sexual attraction. These factors also did not differentially affect the sexual attractiveness of male and female targets (all F values for Sex x Aggression and Sex x Domineering simple interactions were less than 1).

A different pattern emerged for manipulations of dominance. The main effect of dominance on sexual attractiveness was significant, f{ 1,66) = 8.12, p< .01. This main effect was produced by differences in rated attractiveness of men in high- as opposed to low-dominance conditions. Consistent with the results of Experiments 1 through 3, there was a significant Sex x Dominance interaction, F(l, 66) = 9.79, p < .01, with men rated as more attractive in the high-dominance condition.

Ignoramuses and cunts arguing in bad faith love to assert that Game is about being a try-hard douchebag, but it’s nothing of the sort. Game is about amused mastery, subcommunicated through dominant body language and verbal confidence. Domineering men aren’t master seducers; they’re usually romantically insecure and their self-doubt impels them to try to ham-fistedly control women’s fluid flirtations and feral sexuality, instead of smoothly guide women to a heightened state of arousal.

This next finding should piss off another subset of Game denialists:

Results for the dimension of physical attractiveness were similar to the results for sexual attraction. Neither the aggression nor the domineering factor produced an effect on physical attraction. Level of dominance did, however, influence attributions of physical attraction, F( 1, 69) = 6.62, p< .01, and this main effect was again moderated by an interaction of sex and dominance level, F( 1,69) = 4.42, p< .01. Once again, a test of the simple main effects indicated an effect only for men, who were rated as more physically attractive in the high-dominance condition only, ^1,37)= 12.71,p<.01.

Resident Looks Piller wolfie wept.

So why aren’t all men dominant? Well, for one, status hierarchies only have so much room at the top. Two, there are trade-offs in the race for maximal reproductive fitness:

Manipulation of the level of dominance produced a constellation of personality attributions. In addition to its impact on variables related to sexual attraction, the level of dominance significantly influenced attributions concerning the target’s likability, stability, promiscuity, competence, and social class.

High dominance was found to lower the general likability of the target person, F(l, 64) = 38.7, p < .001. There was neither an effect of sex nor any interaction between dominance and sex on this variable. This result indicates that for men there is a potential trade-off between sexual attractiveness and likability, with high dominance increasing the former but reducing the latter. […]

High dominance led to perceptions of greater promiscuity in the target, /(I, 66) – 10.86, p < .002, with high dominance associated with increased promiscuity. A significant Sex X Level of Magnitude interaction, F{1,66) = 5,36,p < .02, indicated that men were perceived as more promiscuous in the high-dominance condition than were women. […]

To summarize, the following influence of dominance level was observed. High dominance increased the rated sexual attractiveness and physical attractiveness of male targets but had no discernable influence on the sexual or physical attractiveness of female targets. High dominance substantially decreased the likability of both sexes and was associated with increases in the rated stability, competence, promiscuity, and social class of both sexes.

Women are sexually attracted to psychosocially dominant men, even as these men are perceived to be less likable and more promiscuous. So no, femcunts and manginas, promiscuous men do not suffer a sexual market penalty. In fact, the perception of promiscuousness and unlikability may help them score additional notches.

It all goes to the old CH saying, “Don’t listen to what a woman says, watch what she does.” Which includes whom she fucks. Women will tell you they want a likable, chaste man, but their pussies are aching for a dominant, unlikable, promiscuous man.

Wynne-Edwards (1962) and Pfeiffer (1969) have suggested that among humans the ability to impress and win deference from others depends on the sum of many qualities, including strength, skill, determination to achieve superiority, and intelligence.

This sentence is a wet kiss planted right on the Heartiste lips, evoking as it does the seminal CH pinned posts “Dating Market Value Test for men and women” and “The 16 Commandments of Poon”.

The results of our fourth experiment suggest that some of the behaviors that may lead to a high rank do not themselves promote an individual’s attractiveness. Aggressive and domineering tendencies did not increase the sexual attractiveness of either males or females. The covariance analysis suggests that the highest levels of sexual attractiveness should occur when males express dominance without the use of such behaviors.

This research is a veritable PSA for the efficacy of Game (learned charisma).

Furthermore, dominance increases the sexual attractiveness of males but does not produce a general halo effect. Individuals simply described as dominant were assumed to be also aggressive and domineering; they were regarded as less likable and were not desired as spouses.

The first unearthing of the famed “alpha fux, beta bux” principle?

Executive Summary: If you want to bed more women, stop trying to make them like you. Instead, make them desire you.

Denying and obfuscating and suppressing these truths about the nature of the sexes inevitably leads to tragic cases like the women on the following magazine cover. Maybe someone should inform these aging beauties that men aren’t attracted to “sassy, sophisticated, solvent” women.

Where have all the good men gone? Back in their nubile 20s, where these sour grapes spinster cows left them. 54 and “looking for love”. jfc the delusion is unreal.

Psychological projection seems to be a feature of the female brain gone insane. What women desire — male dominance — is mistaken by women for what men desire in them. But men don’t love dominance, or sass, or careerism, or ambition in women. What men love is younger, hotter, tighter. Something which these has-beens lost as a bargaining chip a long time ago. And now they claim the chaps they can get just don’t measure up, which translated from the female hamsterese means the only men willing to fuck them are naggers and LSMV dregs with no standards and no other choice but internet porn. In fact, many dregs would choose the Fap Life before laying with one of these sassy harridans.

Sass is tolerable on a 21 year old vixen. It’s boner death on a 54 year old matron.

Likewise, chasteness and likability are tolerable on a dominant man. But they’re tingle killers on a submissive man.

Dominance is Game and Game is pussy.

And pussy is life everlasting. Amen.

657 Responses to “Dominance Increases Male Sexual Attractiveness”

  1. Xtrabeing says:

    I have a little to add from my personal experience.

    I was always a dominant personality — both my parents are Severe-A SuperAlpha Genetic types — but I was raised in a nicey-nice upper-middle-class almost all-white suburb. My natural psychodominance was as a consequence SUPPRESSED by the cultural environment of politeness and consideration in which I was raised. I wasn’t particularly bullied, but I occasionally took shit I shouldn’t have, because of the pussitude of the cultural environment.

    What I found helped was meeting a girl who was submissive and meek, in her nature, and allowing my true self to blossom, crushing out the poisonous turd-blossom of nice culturalism. The girl in my case took to my commands instantly, and she liked my brooding, dark nature. So, it was win-win. If YOU are stuck by your culture — or beta friends — find a weak bitch, and bend her.

    It’ll change you, and her, for the (alpha) better.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Ignoramuses and cunts arguing in bad faith love to assert that Game is about being a try-hard douchebag

    Anyone see the “Adam ruins everything” post about how alpha males don’t exist. Everything that guy does is cringeworthy but that video brought it up a notch.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Random Guy says:

      His bit about the wall only stopping “60%” of illegal immigrants.

      Like that’s a bad thing.

      Than factor in that Trump’s already dropped what 40% of the illegal immigrants who come over here in planes and over-stay their visas etc…just by starting to make the wall.

      Like

      • ML says:

        It isn’t good either. 40% still equals tens of thousands, at a much higher birthrate and who immediately get on public healthcare, in a nation already bankrupt as far as ability to support its rightful citizens.

        In terms of what it means for the average struggling white man — it’s the same bad, and still tending toward worse.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Random Guy says:

        Yeah but that 40% is already getting stopped before the wall is even built by ICE now and Trump just “saying” the wall is getting built.

        Essentially the only thing left “is” the 60% the wall will stop.

        And we kick out about half of the people who come in every year even before the Trump era it was a million and a half or so.

        Get that wall up and the illegal immigrant population will drop to almost nothing in 5 years, maybe less.

        Like

      • ML says:

        That’s just juggling numbers, alas. The only thing that matters is allocation of resources among hundreds of millions of racially jumbled poor. That’s still zero priority for us. All we’re looking at here is whether we’ll be the minority everywhere, city and town, coast and interior, by 2030 or 2040.

        I saw some cat today, prob young and new, going on about how the Hispanics are “starting” to leave the Southwest. Heh heh. Pennsylvania or Massachusetts much?

        We’re just out of time. An ex reports seeing freshly arrived hijabs … in Kalispell.

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        I mean all that really matters for those at the bottom is how shrill your womenfolk are in crying about “my keeeeeds, help my keeeeeds” when the local camera crew show up. Anything else, you’re so far back in the line, why show up at all?

        Like

  3. […] Dominance Increases Male Sexual Attractiveness […]

    Like

  4. mendo says:

    A redux on Neil Young’s Old Man

    Old woman look at my life,
    Fifty four
    and there ain’t much more
    Live alone in a paradise
    That makes me think of two.

    Love lost, such a cost,
    Give me things
    that don’t get lost.
    Like an ass that won’t get tossed
    Rolling home to you.

    Liked by 3 people

  5. CH: jfc the delusion is unreal.

    Original article: Yet as Jane, from Sheffield, explains, it has been a struggle: ‘The men out there are delusional. I went out with a guy who lied about his age, saying he was 47 when he was 50, who then had the gall to tell me he wanted a younger woman so he, as he put it, “could breed”.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4754914/Where-good-men-gone.html#ixzz4ojJyToKZ

    [CH: that man isn’t delusional. he’s quite realistic both in the nature of his desire and in the likelihood of satisfying it. it’s far easier for men to date younger than it is for women to date younger.]

    Liked by 2 people

    • Strong agree. I poasted it as evidence of your point about Jane’s projection.

      Like

    • plumpjack says:

      he WAS delusional for having attempting to have a conversation about his ideal woman with a woman in her forties.

      “At 48, Jane Townsend is beautiful, independent — and single. She keeps fit, takes great care of her appearance and is looking for a man who is active, in good shape, articulate and emotionally open.

      Given her good looks and vivacious nature, eligible suitors must surely be beating a path to her door.

      Yet as Jane, from Sheffield, explains, it has been a struggle: ‘The men out there are delusional. I went out with a guy who lied about his age, saying he was 47 when he was 50, who then had the gall to tell me he wanted a younger woman so he, as he put it, “could breed”.

      ‘After my divorce, I gave up my prime dating years to raise my two girls, expecting that when they left home, I’d have time left. But there has been a shift and now the men aren’t there. Where I live it’s hard to find someone cultured unless they’re eating yoghurt, and the men my age all seem to be — well — more than a little overweight.’”

      ugh…just copying and pasting that load of hamster shite put me in a bad mood.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “ugh…just copying and pasting that load of hamster shite put me in a bad mood.”

        LOL’ed.

        I wonder what happened to her original husb@nd? I feel for her little girlzzzezes, being raised in a toxic sewer of entitled infantilized femc*nt toxoplasma-gondii insanity, but I guess tragedies gonna tragedy.

        PS: I wonder what the notch counts of her daughters are already?

        Liked by 1 person

      • JironGhrad says:

        The idea that any man, of an age suitable to her, might be anything close to emotionally open is laughable. 40 years of being crapped on by twits like Jane would be enough baggage to prevent emotion period.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Scanman says:

        48?! (and as always “beautiful, fit, independent”) Hahaha

        This used up twat wants nothing to do with the caliber of men who have to settle for used up twat and yet, is resentful that she’s lonely.

        And men are delusional…

        This is the blackest kind of comedy.

        Liked by 2 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “the blackest kind of comedy”

        It’s a horrifying tragedy which the Frankfurt School has unleashed upon the world.

        And if we don’t get ahold of matters, then it could become an “ELE” [extinction level event].

        Like

      • CalvinDecline says:

        Reminds me of a lady I work with… she openly tells people she’s a sloot because of her hard partying past… is now divorced with two daughters (the oldest has a halfrican child, go figure)

        Like

    • mmaier2112 says:

      No joke. I have a girl at work that was born the year I graduated HS making sexual innuendos at me un-requested. I am probably going to give in before too long though I’ve had a long-standing no-work-broads policy. She is so slim and fit….

      Liked by 2 people

    • Reb says:

      As I get older, the women get younger. I almost feel like a pedophile at this point.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Mistral says:

      The 52 year-old looks like a tranny.

      Like

    • ultimathule1 says:

      These cunts love to use the word “delusional” as an insult against men who dare to disagree with them. So, in their solipsist way of thinking, anyone who opposes them must be mentally ill.

      Like

  6. Space Viking says:

    The sheer lack of self awareness in listing “sassy” as a good quality… holy shit lol

    Liked by 4 people

    • Cracker says:

      that jumped out at me too. and they all say it.

      Like

    • So many girlz’ Tindér profiles list “sarcastic” as a quality as if it will attract men. Regrettably, the legions of thirsty beta males couldn’t care less, they are but zombies relentlessly and thoughtlessly (or thotless?) stumbling towards any available pussy.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Major7 says:

        Beta = thotless, that’s a good one

        Like

      • midnightavej says:

        Eh you can easily misplace the sarcastic quality. Mr. Midnight wanted sarcasm as a quality to get the sense of humor, obscure references, and everyday irreverence. I think that’s what some people think they mean when they say sarcastic, but it doesn’t manifest that way.

        Usually it’s some drunk party girl saying “beer me bitch!” and not even saying thank you when someone is kind enough to bring you a drink. That’s not sarcasm, that’s just rude behavior.

        Even sarcasm is a middlebrow level of humorous criticism. The truly deep cut comes when you can appear to compliment while shredding a worldview.

        Like

    • plumpjack says:

      “sassy” translates to “I’ll fuck just about anyone who doesn’t fall asleep or walk out on me within the first twenty minutes of meeting”.

      Liked by 3 people

      • mendo says:

        Nailed it!

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Normally they couple it with “classy” as well… “sassy and classy”.

        Meh.

        … sort of the female version of “fake it ’til you make it”, I suppose.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        yep

        i’ve even seen a lot of memes and groups on facebook called intelligent classy girls who like to say f*ck a lot or some version of that.

        right, because nothing says intelligent and classy like talking like a drunk bar whore

        Liked by 1 person

      • MKKBY says:

        “Sassy” doesn’t mean shit. How women describe themselves in dating profiles is next to worthless.

        Just pick them based on looks. Their true personality will only come out after a few dates. Actually, when I was young, women could behave well for 3 dates. Now the low class ho comes out almost instantly. And they wonder why so many men fuck/forget. That’s being in denial.

        Like

    • hans says:

      DON´T SASS!

      (go to 1:20)

      Like

  7. “What women desire — male dominance — is mistaken by women for what men desire in them”

    Women could learn this in five minutes if they bothered to make the slightest effort. I’ve probably spent hundreds of hours studying game. It’s a pretty important point they’re ignoring, with massive consequences for everyone.

    Like

    • Xtrabeing says:

      True, but that would have cascading, recursive effects on their entire worldview, an unpleasant prospect for anyone, but especially ogreish for the dainty-minded ones.

      Like

      • It was unpleasant to realize my youthful romanticism was misguided, but I’m a better person for it.

        Women only seem to discover self-awareness once they’ve already hit the wall. Then they rage against nature instead of doing anything constructive.

        Like

      • Xtrabeing says:

        But the great Heartiste himself illumines how little women can do with their personality when their face/body’s a soggy old washrag like you left on the washing-room floor in the basement that’s hardened over two months into a gray twisted ugliness. They’re fucked, and they kinda know it, and it leaves a bitter taste in their mouths. Men age great — so many men look fine into their forties and fifties (Sting the musician looks awesome in his 60s) but women just fall the fuck apart after age 29. Heartiste also has touched on this in his “sad reflection on an old photo” piece.

        Liked by 1 person

      • gunslingergregi says:

        the romanticism aint necessarily for her only its fun
        for me
        so I do it
        cause I like it
        cause it makes those moments in life special and memorable for me too
        and for them too the shit I done they will remember forever
        I try to create moments in time
        and any chick who can’t handle that will not be with me in long term capacity
        my wife been waiting 6 years now for me to come home
        so I mean obviously she don’t mind it
        but she suffered like a mofo prob
        so dam is it good to be good
        I guess if some eternal bliss afterlife it will be

        Liked by 1 person

      • Reb says:

        Zactly guns, the shit we alphas do, we do it because it’s our favorite thing right now

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        well not alpha then since I should be in indo

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        and I don’t fuck any chick I can just because I can

        Like

      • ML says:

        My favorite type now is a busty “white trash” late 30-something with a slut for a daughter who realizes women are fucking terrible. Talking to a woman who understands is surreal.

        Like

      • CalvinDecline says:

        There’s nothing LESS valuable to society than a young man… but that changes as he approaches 30.

        There’s nothing MORE valuable to society than a young woman, but that changes as she approaches 30.

        Women are burdened with having to make all their most important life decisions between the ages of 21-30 (maybe 35)… or else they’re basically left to rot. Men have a lot more opportunities to fuck up and still turn things around, and that’s because women are born knowing what their life purpose is. Men have to struggle and work and toil to figure out their purpose, and even then, it doesn’t mean they’ll reproduce.

        Liked by 1 person

    • mendo says:

      I think someone wrote a comment on here awhile back stating he was with a group at bar or some other function and a woman there bragged about some physical accomplishment, something more on the masculine scale, and said she had earned her “man card,” saying that as though other men would want her.

      The story stayed with me at just the obliviousness of these women, but I repeat myself.

      Like

      • Xtrabeing says:

        Yeah, I hear ya, mendo. It reminds me of a girl who wanted my ass at a west coast university. I was sitting there talking and she mentioned a guy who was proud of how much he could stuff his face with food. She was hesitantly marveling over the distastefulness of it. But the guy in question just wanted to be liked, and so does the “man card” talkin’ girl. When you look at it from that angle — and I can’t believe I’m being so emphathic — it’s kind of understandable for a temporary duration at the least.

        Like

      • Projection explains so much – from tattoos and piercings, to vulgarity and other masculine behaviors.

        I suppose if everything is handed to you, there is no incentive to do any introspection until it’s too late.

        Like

    • Publius says:

      Yep. Women have zero curiosity about ANYTHING when it comes to the nitty gritty of WHY something works or is how it is.

      Think about it.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        They definitely don’t get “into stuff” like men do… which is why they’re not (ahem) equally-represented in certain fields.

        Another thing I noticed is that they have little concern for preventive action and maintenance… I guess ’round chere we call it “future orientation”.

        They actually find it annoying, go figger.

        One anecdote that sticks in my memory is a time I was in NYC and a husband and wife had just arrived at some restaurant to meet their twenty-something son. Apparently the son had given piss-poor directions to said restaurant, saying it was next to a given store, when it fact it was across a long street and off to the side of a different store.

        The father was telling the son, in a kind fatherly manner, that he should take his time and be more accurate when giving directions in the future, because otherwise, if it were a more important meeting, he’d be wasting peoples’ time and causing more confusion and even stress than warranted.

        The mother says: “Oh, what difference does it make? We’re here now!”

        This is why we lose.

        Like

      • The Philosopher Redux says:

        Rollo Tomassi writes a lot about this. If women were to confront the world as it truly is, they would not be able to psychologically function as mothers.

        Its actually important that women aren’t aware of jewish paedophile blackmail rings, the cia/mossad sending their sons to war for Zion or most politicians being bribed cuckolds for people that live in offshore bathhouses in the Caribbean.

        Its for men, warriors, to see evil and strike it down.

        Liked by 2 people

      • bolg says:

        @TPR

        “…Its actually important that women aren’t aware of jewish paedophile blackmail rings, …

        …Its for men, warriors, to see evil and strike it down.”

        Over at Vox’s:

        http://voxday.blogspot.bg/2017/08/the-sickness-in-hollywood.html

        beware, stay keep clear of stuff that breaks while reading it. evenmoreso if you have kids of your own.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        They know its really magic

        Like

  8. gunslingergregi says:

    give every dude a giant cock make the bitches feel inferior cause they can’t fit it

    Like

  9. You know you’re doing it right when:

    Liked by 2 people

  10. Demonstrating and exerting such dominance really comes down to the little things.

    When I need to talk to go talk to some sexy little administrative assistcunt about a matter, I don’t stand in front of her desk like a supplicant getting in line. I go behind her, put my hand on the back of her chair, and make her swivel her body and look right up at me. Or, I plop myself right down on a chair in their office, cross my leg, lean back, and tell them what I want them to do. I sometimes pick up a trinket and make a smirking remark, such as, “nice candle. So romantic.” When you’re in an office of betaboys who agree and nod repeatedly with everything the girlz say, you’re leagues ahead already.

    Such behaviour was not easily come by. It took considerable effort to undo years of polite WASP society programming where one appears in a doorway, knocks on the door, asks if one “has a minute”, asks if you can sit down, etc. I felt like a dick at first but now it’s second nature.

    Being nice will NOT get you laid.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Xtrabeing says:

      Les Saunders and I are sympatico.

      Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      well if honest and kind when everyone else is dishonest and steals cheats always hustlin
      it kind of makes you stand the fuck out
      but yea if everyone manor like and you the diferent
      like they say with contrast maybe
      although ex ex said when she first met me
      she didn’t think she was gonna live through the encounter
      she was talking like 50 words a minute about her life he he he

      Liked by 2 people

    • oink says:

      Apropos of nothing

      Did ya deosoul that kraut intern visitor?

      Like

    • Reb says:

      There you go

      Like

    • Democritus says:

      A judicious expansion of “outcome independent”, ZFG well illustrated in real time.

      This sort of thing really does move mountains in Betaville, and there’s more of a practical example set here in Les’s short vignette than in a thousand silly, self-assertion seminars.

      Like

    • vaguely human slav says:

      was watching poker show last night and noticed a euro being interviewed by the hotness MCing the thing … he followed CH advise had his arms around the hips like they were just sashaying down to grab drinks together. She seemed tingled. Unlike the noids who can’t even make eye contact with her

      Like

    • CalvinDecline says:

      I like this.

      A girl in my office and I have been making eyes at each other but I could only make small talk and polite bullshit. I knew I needed to turn up the dial… so the next time she walked by, I just straight up gave her the finger.

      She lit right up… and with a grin and curious-wide-eyes crowded my desk and asked “omg what was that for?!” I’ll admit that I caved and said “aw I’m just teasin’” with a smirk, but she was just so blown away by it that I couldn’t help but try and bring her back down to earth. I should’ve followed up with a joking “what’re you gonna do about it?” but you live and you learn.

      Despite my failure to follow up… she stuck around and unloaded a flood of personal questions, asking me about my life, hobbies, weekend plans, etc. Need to try this one more often.

      Like

  11. wolfie65 says:

    Revenge of the Short Bald Nerds, manosphere style.
    Complete with ‘science’.
    How novel.

    [CH: nice evasion. and red herring.]

    Like

    • Major7 says:

      It is kinda novel, actually. Common sense is rare nowadays. Science that confirms reality when it comes to sexuality is rare. So yeah, sadly novel.

      Like

    • Reb says:

      Dominated by a short bald nerd you dirty sloot

      Liked by 1 person

      • wolfie65 says:

        Try this: Cherry-pick the 1 ‘science study’ that actually supports your mostest favoritest pet theory – flying squarely in the face of 10,000 billion real life examples that prove, beyond the shadow of ANY doubt, the opposite, squeeze your eyes shut REAL hard, stick your head in the sand as deep as it’ll go, squeeze both thumbs with all your doyouevenliftbro might and wish – wish – wish as HARD as you can.
        Maybe, just maybe, that Disney star will make it come true.
        Now go forth and be ‘dominant’, boys.
        Good luck.

        Some pretty lies perish here, but not all…….

        Like

    • mendo says:

      More and more I’m thinking wolfie’s in the vein of TSW in that he’s really a she.

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I’d be surprised…

        Strapunzel had an awful lot of yenta tells, but wolfenstein gives off the air of merely having been raised in a single-parent dominant mom home, and as much as he fancies himself red-pilled, he still hasn’t quite cut through that Gordian Knot.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Wolfie thinks pretty typically of a Northern European man his age.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

        I often disagree with the wolfman, but I don’t doubt his sincerity.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bolg says:

        i always enjoy wolfie’s stuff. he makes sense, except for the game-denial rants. but that’s just him trolling ch, i think.

        or he has beautiful hair like sorcerygod’s and doesn’t need game.

        it’s the internet, who cares.

        Like

    • The Philosopher Redux says:

      Looks are a function of your personality. Most men look like their personality. And your personality can be physiologically engineered.

      I would think both of you are wrong in that I genuinely think a man can go up the social ladder with just testosterone, not ‘looks’ or ‘game’.

      Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        @ The Philosopher Redux

        I don’t believe that. For one, in some fields the betas can gang up on you. In others, like pro sports, there is plenty of T around so for success there has to be distinguishing characteristics at play.

        Speaking of T and going up the social ladder, has anyone else here seen the 2017 movie Shot Caller? The Nazi white guy is a kind of a good guy. And justified in what he does. Kinda beta in other ways. I can’t work it out. What is the main point that Zog wants me to entertain?

        It is not a very demoralizing movie at all although it should be. Or maybe that is just the way I look at things now.

        Me (at the cinema watching “Dunkirk” and yelling at the screen) For godsake boys,stop dillydallying! You’ll let them get away!”

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        They do make the other nazis look retarded and ugly. So maybe they just made the mistake of casting a tall, good looking white man in the lead. Then they gave him social dominance as well. Propaganda mistake, I think.

        Of course there is a supercoon leader of men who doesn’t talk in nigger babble but they don’t even have the white being arrested by thecoon with one foot on his neck or anything like that.They usually throw that stuff in our faces.

        Maybe they just dropped the ball on this one.

        Like

  12. Doktor Jeep says:

    I can say much for the results of having a “fuck right off” attitude towards women I would not touch with a borrowed 10′ pole and find that I could not get rid of them.
    “Fuck off” done wrong can be considered some kind of dominance? Or perhaps I was dealing with retarded women. Who knows.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      “could not get rid of them”

      This is a YUUGGGGE problem for Nice Guys Who Always Finish Last.

      Especially when the beey0tches start crying. G0d I hate it when they start crying.

      Like

    • Reb says:

      Use em or lose em

      Like

      • bolg says:

        “if you can’t fuck it or eat it, then kill it”

        “Carnivore” –Peter Steele

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        bolg
        “if you can’t fuck it or eat it, then kill it”
        “Carnivore” –Peter Steele””””””

        dam man that got to be one of the hardest quotes ever put to writing

        Like

  13. Based Papist says:

    “Sass is tolerable on a 21 year old vixen. It’s boner death on a 54 year old matron.”

    54 year old matron alone is already boner death.

    Like

    • but this is code. What do they mean by sass?

      sophisticated: drinks white wine alone.
      solvent: a job, I guess.

      sassy???? Note that they didn’t use “hot” or “sexy” or even “coquettish”.

      I guess they mean “fun” but in a drinks white wine alone after doing job kinda way.

      Like

      • kaminsky says:

        “Sassy” means they bitch about men constantly and generally act like complete assholes. That’s “sassy,”…a loud, macho cunt of a female whose voice cuts across rooms and who never stops hemorrhaging unhappiness out of her mouth

        Liked by 5 people

      • JironGhrad says:

        Solvent just means has more money coming in than out. It may or may not be a job… or alimony payments/child support. Probably the latter, in reality; since let’s face it, most women are REALLY TRULY TERRIBLE at managing spending.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Exurban says:

        I agree with Kaminsky. “Sassy” means rude, crude, and loud. It’s definitely a negative indicator.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        “Sassy” means “I can say WHATEVER I want, WHENVER I want, and to WHOMEVER I want… and without consequences, if you please.”

        Much like most of youse yeggs ’round chere. . kekekekekekekekek

        Liked by 1 person

      • streetsweeper says:

        Greg “I’m cool like the rest of you! Really I am!” Eliot says:

        “Much like most of youse yeggs ’round chere. . kekekekekekekekek”

        a joke at the expense of “most” of your fellow chateau guests. how funny.

        do you write your own jokes, Greg? got us all in stitches. hilarious. really hilarious

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        dweebstreep, never before did someone rush so quickly to make my point for me. You just buried the mercury on the douche chill-o-meter.

        Wake up to yourself. (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        In a normal world, ‘sassy’ would mean she’s not afraid to speak her mind and challenges things that need challenging.
        Which is good, if very uncomfortable for the FatherKnowsJack ‘silverbacks’ and those who would like to be.
        In today’s reality, ‘sassy’ usually just translates to Ev1l Com@t1ve B1tch.

        Liked by 1 person

      • mendo says:

        dweebstreep doesn’t understand it when men chide one another in good faith.

        As usual, he’s wearing his feelings on his sleeve.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        In a normal world, ‘sassy’ would mean she’s not afraid to speak her mind and challenges things that need challenging.
        Which is good, if very uncomfortable for the FatherKnowsJack ‘silverbacks’ and those who would like to be.

        Even in your 2D-thinking, daddy-hatin’ world, that is nowhere near a true definition for ‘sassy’.

        But with you self-admittedly having been raised in a single mom-who-hated-me home, it’s not surprising that you give legs to the connotation that feminists WANT to be attached to that word.

        Boy, you’re really hitting on all cylinders today… trying to fill the quota before sundown, are you?

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

    • Cracker says:

      tolerable maybe. but it still shouldn’t be tolerated… no matter how hot she is.

      Like

  14. Based Papist says:

    Love reading you, H. But stuff like this is so off:

    “Dominance is Game and Game is pussy.
    And pussy is life everlasting. Amen.”

    Progeny, having a dynasty is life everlasting. It is what is worthwhile in life. If you don’t have that you have nothing.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Publius says:

      This.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Captain Obvious says:

      CH: “pussy is life everlasting. Amen.”

      BP: “Progeny… is life everlasting”

      BP, I got into the Manosphere and the PUA KKKommunity after years of studying the collapse in Total Fert!lity Rates and reading anecdotal reports that young people are barely even copulating anymore, and I put two and two together and realized that if the White Race is to survive, then we have got to get tens of millions of Betas & Incel Gammas off of the X-Box in their mother’s basement and back out into the real world slaying teh p00ntang.

      tl;dr == Absent D*ck In P*ssy, the White Race goes extinct.

      PPS: Apparently it’s even worse in Japan – apparently no one in Japan is copulating anymore.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Revenge of the Scyth says:

        The sex drive of Japanese men is already so low that when you throw porn into the equation…

        Like

      • Random Guy says:

        Some of the Japanese are copulating; ever hear of the Out Post 9 guy? Doesn’t really matter; but he was an ESL guy who taught over in Japan.

        Said a lot of the high school kids are getting it on at extreme rates it’s just that abortion’s a pretty common thing over there.

        Essentially it’s the “20% of the guys get 80% of the Girls” thing but to an even greater extreme.

        That and lots of Japanese guys just don’t have the ca-hones to ask out Japanese girls apparently……

        Like

    • bolg says:

      pussy is the fountain of life, dude.

      ok, the egregore of pussy. not the actual thing with the vaguely fishy smell.

      it all makes sense.

      Like

      • Random Guy says:

        That’s actually true; in countries where Guys date younger as a general thing, the health of the general population for both sexes is better.

        Like

  15. I must have missed sixty minutes, what the fuck is “Sass” or “sassy”? Is this a sex thing, like butt stuff? Or a substitute for hot?

    Like

    • Here are some English equivalents for “sassy”, although I don’t know how they translate to your native tongue:

      Smart Aleck
      Rude
      Abrasive
      Grating
      Shrewish
      Nasty
      Hateful
      Witchy

      Liked by 2 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        I find that “dict DOT leo DOT org” has some excellent translations.

        For instance, here are the “dict.leo.org” translations of “shrewish” and “zänkisch”:

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        And here are some translations of “sassy” into German; one translation is “keck” [cheeky], and here are the translations of “keck” into Russian:

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        BTW, here is “cheeky” at “thefreedictionary.com”:

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        That last definition – basically “a rude child” – is pretty close to “sassy”.

        Like

      • SteveRogers42 says:

        Another all-purpose one is: “Full of shit”.

        Like

      • Cracker says:

        that’s what it used to mean captain

        but girls have bastardized it so bitchy, rude, vulgar, ballbusting all fall under the definition of sassy now

        Like

      • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

        Let’s be clear: women describing themselves as “sassy” is a result of Jewish brainwashing campaigns. They didn’t just start doing this on their own.

        This Daily Mail piece is Jewish propaganda itself, the aim of which is to normslise the childléss/aging slüt/Sex and STD lifestyle.

        Women wouldn’t proclaim themselves as “sassy” if subterfuge articles weren’t published.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        When I was a kid, sassy got you smacked.

        Liked by 1 person

      • vaguely human slav says:

        so…butt stuff.

        Like

      • stevetirone says:

        Yes. For some reason, they think that’s charming to men, and somehow makes them desirable. Why, I’ll never understand.

        Liked by 2 people

      • stevetirone says:

        Actually, I think I do understand: women aren’t funny, and they certainly aren’t witty. They mistake being snotty and bitchy as witty. And since actual wit is charming, they think that being snotty and bitchy — ‘sassy’ or ‘snarky’ — is charming, and therefore desirable.

        Liked by 1 person

      • stevetirone says:

        That definition ‘inpertinently bold; impudent and saucy’ also is a key. They got away with that shit when they were little girls, and were seen as cute. Now, when they’re used-up hags they default back to what worked when they were kids, not recognizing the tremendous dissonance between a saucy six-year-old and an impudent old bitch.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Dict dot c c is the best German dictionary.

        As for sassy, they’d say either frech (Don’t be fresh! as my grandma would say) or just sassy in English because they’re such cucks.

        Like

    • bolg says:

      “vaguely human slav” is quite the butthurt handle.

      what do you have to prove? (((two passports)))?

      Like

  16. hard9bf says:

    “Psychological projection seems to be a feature of the female brain gone insane. What women desire — male dominance — is mistaken by women for what men desire in them. But men don’t love dominance, or sass, or careerism, or ambition in women.”

    It’s a projection of the ideal man onto herself, as if embodying the traits she desires is the key to attracting her ideal man. A man doesn’t attract his ideal woman by making himself beautiful, sweet, loving, and chaste — women would view him as vain, weak, and likely a s0domite.

    (((Feminism))) teaches girls to embody masculine virtues, it teaches childless spinsterhood, it teaches unhappiness.

    Like

    • kaminsky says:

      Yeah but guys do the inverse. Look at all the guys in the gym trying to pump up their pecs and get them all substantial and curvy. I’m a lifter too but ‘pumping up’ and overeating just to swell up is for guys in projection mode at best, faggots at worst.

      Liked by 1 person

      • mendo says:

        That’s a friggin’ great analogy.

        Like

      • Publius says:

        Never met a ripped huge dude without a GF who was at least pretty dang hot.

        Like

      • Cracker says:

        all the big puffy bodybuilders i’ve ever seen have had girls who are too muscular and tan with big fake tits and bleach blonde hair. most of them nowadays are instragram whores with tats all over too.

        that’s not hot in my opinion.

        Liked by 3 people

      • Cracker says:

        rarely are you ever going to see classy feminine hot girls with muscleheads

        Like

      • ML says:

        Many other animals “puff up” attempting to intimidate others or defend themselves. With men it becomes a “lifestyle”, for two reasons: to compete with men of other races who constitute a threat, and for a rapidly diminishing resource – white women. The problem is that they’re generally not worth competing for, that our society is literally crumbling around us. And that’s what makes it so absurd, even if the meatheads can kick your ass.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Bad women is caused by a lack of male leadership

        Like

  17. vaguely human slav says:

    Still amused…these bitches are all like “chaps don’t measure up, better bring in the somalis…”

    Like

    • kaminsky says:

      Watch how quickly Anglo men would ‘measure up’ if you brought in about 10 million young Eastern European, Asian, and Latin hotties to threaten the easy pickings that fat Anglo women currently have access to. All of a sudden decent, lean software programmer Steve is out of reach for Fat Ass McKayla. It would change everything

      Liked by 3 people

      • SteveRogers42 says:

        Wonder if ol’ dusty-muff Merkel would be all “open borders” if Europe was being immivaded by millions of unaccompanied 18-25 yoa women from Thailand and the Philippines.

        Like

      • Mistral says:

        And *BOOM!* goes the dynamite!

        It never ONCE occurs to these skanks that maybe they miscalculated by wasting their prime-time years working in cubicle jobs, and trying to act like men, or the caricature of men that they think is reality, and now that their uteruses are dried-up raisins, mourning the babies they never had, they have to place blame somewhere and it *couldn’t possibly* be on them.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Johnny Redux says:

      Those old “sassy” women are free to take a sexcation in Africa or the Caribbean, and get all the syphilitic semen their mothy muffs can handle. Plenty of “good” men in those locations will to overlook their fat, wrinkles, and sassiness, for a few Euros per day.

      Like

  18. Libertardian says:

    One of these articles seems to come out every year or so, either in Femail (UK) or some Aussie rag (just a coincidence these places rank at the top for feminist lunacy). Often it’s an ad for some dating service thinly disguised as a story. In any case I see nothing is being learned. It’s those damn betas who just don’t measure up, right, right. Zzzz

    Liked by 1 person

    • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

      “or some Aussie rag (just a coincidence these places rank at the top for feminist lunacy).”

      As an Aussie; I can confirm that Australia is a strong favourite for gold medals in the Feminist Lunacy Olympics.

      Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        Mr.Mustard – Why is it that the Aussies you meet in Europe are usually really cool, but the Aussies you meet in the States have huge chips on their shoulders ?

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Only the ones you meet in Cali. Women dig the accent and it gives them a leg up.

        Like

      • Random Guy says:

        You ever notice that female Aussie’s lose the accent almost as quickly as they can?

        Like

      • Mr Meaner says:

        Can confirm that American women love the Aussie accent on men.

        I’ve noticed it doesn’t work for Aussie women though.

        The accent is inherently masculine.

        Like

      • Democritus says:

        There were a surprising amount of Australian exchange students back in college. They seemed like decent, easy-going and good-natured fellows, always ready with and for a beer – maybe a little TOO ready a little too early in the day for us Middle-Class-Middle-American boys. But they always got their business done and you got a sense that you could trust them.

        The girls seemed a little more pissier, a little more hung-over. The guys did seem inclined to date American women.

        More power to them.

        Like

      • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

        “Mr.Mustard – Why is it that the Aussies you meet in Europe are usually really cool, but the Aussies you meet in the States have huge chips on their shoulders ?”

        Aussies grow up on a diet of American tv, movies etc. and as a result when they come over, they probably develop some sort of inferiority complex.

        Also, Australia traditionally has been a country with a social safety net.
        Aussies are inherently at odds with the American “look after oneself”, go- getter, liberty and freedom attitude.

        Aussies probably go to the US thinking that they are somehow “better” but soon realise that the reality is different.

        True competition, other than on the sporting field is foreign to most Aussies.
        We have become a feminised, potically correct society of sheeple.

        Like

      • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

        “Also, feminism is worse in Australia. In the US, race (especially black) trumps gender, so retarded feminism has to fight for air time.”

        When the likes of Clementine Ford (Australian feminist writer, broadcaster and public speaker) have public forums to pour forth their stupid shit; you know things are seriously messed up.

        Like

    • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

      “The girls seemed a little more pissier, a little more hung-over. The guys did seem inclined to date American women.”

      Compared to Australian women, most American women I have met are sweethearts.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I must agree. They have become like rattle snakes,

        Like

      • Mr Meaner says:

        My fellow Aussie Mustard is on the money.

        American women leave Australian women for dead.

        American men would have a renewed appreciation for their women (if that was possible) if they ever dealt with Aussie women.

        Also, feminism is worse in Australia. In the US, race (especially black) trumps gender, so retarded feminism has to fight for air time.

        No such problem in Australia.

        Liked by 1 person

  19. ‘Men need to open their eyes to the amazing women in their own age bracket.’

    No, we don’t.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Just Saying says:

      I’m in my mid-50’s and while I’ll bed a mid-30;s woman, if they are older than 25 that’s too old for any relationship for a simple reason, they start to get baby-rabies – no thanks.

      I haven’t been with a woman older than 40 since my mid-teens, for a very simple reason – they just don’t hold a candle to 20-year-olds… Not my fault that they don’t turn me on. I am as God made me, and I’ve always accepted that. I see no reason to change now.

      Like

      • kaminsky says:

        “they just don’t hold a candle to 20-year-olds”

        …amen.

        Not just on the surface either. It’s the smell, the tiny details, the skin of their necks, everything.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        dating older women (over 30) may be easy because there’s so many and they’re so willing, but it WILL depress a guy. literally.

        you’ll start to think like them. they’ll wear you down with “when are you going to mature?”, “why can’t you just c-o-n-n-e-c-t with me?”, “you work too much…”, etc. etc.

        being around that negativity is like eating the wrong foods. bad news. stay away.

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Old men die early because of old women.

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        @Just Saying: That is called being normal. There is a reason that Nature, God, whatever you want to call it, has women go through menopause starting in their late 30s to early 40s…it’s because they are not sexual beings at that point, and not meant to be. By that age, they should be raising children for their husband, who should be 20 years older than them and starting (but not necessarily always) to lose interest in constant sex by then, too.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

        A number of my buddies got married relatively early (25, 26) to girlz their own age and now, into their mid-30s they are stuck banging a wife also in their mid-30s. It’s pitiable for them, when I think of just how vastly superior it is to romance a 22 year old compared to a 35 year old, even the “hot” 35 year olds can’t compare.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Old men die early because of old women.

        Women outlive men because they don’t have wives. 😉

        There is a reason that Nature, God, whatever you want to call it, has women go through menopause starting in their late 30s to early 40s…it’s because they are not sexual beings at that point, and not meant to be. By that age, they should be raising children for their husband, who should be 20 years older than them and starting (but not necessarily always) to lose interest in constant sex by then, too.

        That’s a fair point… although I’d bump that menopause thing up to late forties, and the age separation down about five years, given this modernity of ours. 😉

        Liked by 2 people

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I’d be divorced with that small of an age spread. 15 years minimum. 20 is best.

        Like

      • mendo says:

        15 years minimum. 20 is best.

        I’ll 2nd that!

        Like

      • bolg says:

        “… dating older women (over 30) may be easy because there’s so many and they’re so willing, but it WILL depress a guy. literally….”

        “dating” a single woman over 30 is suicide by baggage.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        @bolg: “suicide by baggage”

        that’s a bloody sharp shiv right there.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        thanks pj

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Women need to expand their vocabulary for adjectives beyond “amazing”.

      Everything and everyone is “amazing”… and everything they do “empowers” them.

      Liked by 4 people

      • Captain Obvious says:

        GE, nobody reads anymore.

        We’re raising legions of kids now who are functionally illiterate [even after they’ve gotten their bachelors degrees].

        Liked by 1 person

      • JironGhrad says:

        This always amuses me. Those “education level quizzes” that keep popping up as ads… I refused to give into credentialism (sometimes to my fiscal detriment, I’m sure) but those damn quizzes are convinced I have a masters or PHD.

        Like

      • Cracker says:

        yeah, the loss of language is pretty sad

        i’m a sucker for well written dialogue or at least some good verbal skills that involve more than middle school level chatter about television chores or some other mundane topic.

        being able to string together a good sentence with a good vocabulary is something people used to value. sad that it’s become a rarity

        Like

      • Les Saunders, Protestant says:

        I’ve noticed with revulsion this trend as well, Greg. It is a reflection of the depths of their intellectual penury.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        They’re not very bright and get their culture from TV. What do you expect?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        true

        and some of them will be the main caregivers/teachers of children. imagine how much that will stunt the intellect of the kids.

        half the time they will be plugged into social media, television, movies, or some other electronic device. the rest of the time will be spent with a dumb vacuous mom who can’t offer anything as far as intellectual stimulation or growth. even if the dad is involved, he’ll most likely spend a lot less time than she will with the kids. she will be the kids main influence.

        all the more reason to get a girl who is smart to raise your kids. unfortunately, most of the smart girls get sucked into the college/career track so they aren’t the ones having babies.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        i remember the time when the adjective de jour was lovely. it was, well, nice.

        better than amazing, it’s male counterpart awesome and xir cousin fabulous.

        Like

    • Exurban says:

      The word “amazing” has been totally ruined. It’s now a flashing red light light warning you that you’re in crazy bullshitland.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        The other go-to word they’ve ruined is “fabulous”, which they WILL sometimes use in lieu of “amazing” to describe things eminently believable and ordinary.

        Liked by 1 person

    • wolfie65 says:

      First off, I move the word ‘amazing’ be stricken from the dictionary.
      Women ruined that, too, by MASSIVE overuse.

      Second, women in my age bracket who might actually deserve anything even close to that label come around maybe once a year, and even then, there are, at any given time, at least dozens, if not hundreds of 20-somethings who deserve it more.
      If you add the fact that my interests, activities and lifestyle resemble that of a high sch00l or college student more than they resemble anything else, what would I do with a middle-aged soccer m0m with mortgages, early arthritis and lubrication issues ?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        If you add the fact that my interests, activities and lifestyle resemble that of a high sch00l or college student more than they resemble anything else, what would I do with a middle-aged soccer m0m with mortgages, early arthritis and lubrication issues ?

        High school boy, indeed!

        Any grown man knows that you keep a can of WD-40 around the house for them pesky lubrication issues.

        Like

    • Libertardian says:

      They ought to hold accountable the fruitbats who told them it was a good idea to fuck and chuck until 40 and then pull the ripcord and bail out with a beta chump. But feminazism, like communism and multikultism, is unfalsifiable; better to blame the ever-handy patriarchy and, like Boxer in Animal Farm, promise “I will screeech louder Comrade!”

      Like

    • Mistral says:

      LOL. I’m too busy plunging my cock into 21 year old snatch to notice the very un-amazing women my own age.

      Like

    • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

      I find elephants amazing.
      Doesn’t mean I want to take one home to meet my parents.

      Like

  20. Random Guy says:

    Not only do these women not get it.

    They are often way over-rating their own personal SMV.

    It isn’t that good men aren’t out there, it’s that they aren’t willing to go out with them because they feel like they could do better and they often are that “bad”, the men I mean, they just aren’t on the level the women would like.

    Reminds me of an article talking about Monica Belluci in James Bond, where she mentioned not MB but the women in the article, about how she was hoping one that it might help her other actress friend in her fifties get more dates.

    Checked out the women she was referring to and it was like. Lady she ain’t no Monica Belluci.

    It also would have been interesting to see how this plays out with lesbian women.

    Like

    • xxxxxxxxxxxx says:

      Monica Bellucil despite her grace and beauty, was left by her husband Vincent Cassel. What hope for oridinary middle aged women.

      Like

      • Random Guy says:

        Well; she has been getting chunkier lately.

        That’s why you never let yourself get fat.

        No matter what your bitter lady friends say keep it together.

        Like

  21. OldDog says:

    “Domineering men aren’t master seducers; they’re usually romantically insecure and their self-doubt impels them to try to ham-fistedly control women’s fluid flirtations and feral sexuality, instead of smoothly guide women to a heightened state of arousal”

    It’s hard to overemphasize the importance of understanding this. In talking with women over the years, if one thing stood out that repelled women, this would be it. On the other hand, a man who understands, as Mr Speed Seduction, Ross Jeffries put forward, that capturing and leading a woman’s imagination to give her the emotional experiences she’s really looking for, is the key skill that’s the most important thing to have, is the guy who will have women’s enduring interest. In fact, that’s an “opener” question that I’ve often asked women: what would rather have: a man to buy you a present or man that will take your imagination to a place that it’s never been?

    The women that respond with the latter are the ones you want.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Marc says:

      Poon Commandment No. IX ftw

      Like

    • oink says:

      cool story bro

      Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      Good point.
      The fantasy that ‘dominance’ is, in itself, an arousal factor falls into much the same category as the wish to return to the (very repressive) `1950s, the ‘shut up, men are talking, go make me a sammich’ type thing, the baseless insults hurled at anyone who doesn’t agree with the 100% – it’s insecurity.
      They feel they have to keep everything in a d3@th grip at all times or it will slip away.,
      Not realizing that all they’re really accomplishing is alienating people, k1ll1ng what they (allegedly) hold dear and producing the exact counterreactions they are trying so very hard to prevent.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        the baseless insults hurled at anyone who doesn’t agree with the 100% – it’s insecurity.

        Baseless?

        Got news for ya, wolfenberg… sometimes the insults hurled your way are well-merited.

        And said insults stem, not from the hurlers’ alleged “insecurity”, rather, from shills like you who can’t escape from the Synathedral’s Alinsky shaming script shiboleths, such as “very repressive 1950’s” (bullshit… it was a time of unprecedented freedom, especially from feminist and sjw claptrap, let alone shitskin effrontery) and the shithouse psychology gambit (“he made me feel bad, I didn’t deserve it, I’m awesome, ergo there’s something wrong with him… he’s ‘insecure’)

        Go dance around a maypole with goat horns on yo’ haid, alt-R ally. (((shkain’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        JIDF Demoralization Troll

        Like

  22. Anonymous says:

    Bitches come runnin’…

    Like

  23. kaminsky says:

    All those stuffed HR cubicles and advanced degree classrooms while the squat racks stand empty. They’ve got it all wrong.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Johnny Redux says:

    “Sassy” = Is nothing more than a fancy way of saying she’s a f*cking b*tch.

    Liked by 2 people

  25. cortesar says:

    Reminder: People like this actually exist. pic.twitter.com/IXPWrf5wdg

    — Justin Ian ❌ (@Emp_JustinIan) August 1, 2017

    Like

  26. Reb says:

    Just realized that I have been overgaming women. Been too dominant too fast? The accumulation over a lifetime of alpha male traits has left scoring top pussy for me almost trivial at this point. Current target is a 21 year old blond nine or ten, take your pick. She volunteered her number in less than thirty seconds.

    My theory is that men have become so overburdened with the globalist feminist law and order that to be simply a man is to become an extreme rebel, an outlaw. This is rare. Women love it. Rebel at every opportunity and you will achieve it.

    Like

  27. Captain Obvious says:

    SJWs Melt Down over Bruce Willis’ ‘Death Wish’ Trailer: ‘Alt-Right,’ ‘Racist,’ ‘Nakedly Fascist’ http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3574401/posts

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Before I even watched the trailer I guessed:

        a) White redneck types killed his wife and raped his daughter.

        b) Sympathetic negros, front and center… bonus points for children victims that will be avenged..

        c) Most of his targets will be creepy White guys… maybe ONE token n1gger and the odd spic or two.

        d) His own family might have a little mix to it.

        The daughter appears to have a little mix, if mine eye did not deceive me… leastwise, she didn’t look like an Aryan of bluest eye, as per both parents.

        Liked by 1 person

      • mendo says:

        This film was directed by (((Eli Roth))) after all.

        Like

      • Diversity Heretic says:

        Watched the trailer–don’t think I’ll bother with the movie. The original Death Wish with Charles Bronson in the 1970s was quite good.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        How else would it have gotten green-lighted?

        Like

      • The Philosopher Redux says:

        Did you know the original deathwise was a real alt right movie. Same as taxi driver.

        Travis Bickle was alt right before Tyler Durden.

        Like

      • Mistral says:

        >The daughter appears to have a little mix, if mine eye did not deceive me… leastwise, she didn’t look like an Aryan of bluest eye, as per both parents.

        Somehow Elizabeth Shue and Bruce Willis produced Camila Morrone, who is Argentinean. Don’t get me wrong 9/10 would totally bang, but still.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Ah, I see mine eye did not fail me… at first I wrote Hispanic mix, but toned it back because it could have been any number of (ahem) more swarthy ethic groups.

        Well, if’n you’re gonna mix with Hispanic, you could do worse than Argentina. 😉

        At least they didn’t make the daughter an adopted negress or Oriental. Surprised (((they))) missed THAT opportunity.

        Liked by 1 person

    • Ironsides says:

      Ironic, considering that he appears to be mostly killing white guys in it.

      Like

      • Random Guy says:

        That’s the thing with SJW’s, it’s never enough.

        It’s also why you can’t ever apologize or back down it’s just blood in the water.

        Similar to interacting with women I suppose.

        Like

    • Nads says:

      Bruce Willis is good, but charles Bronson in the original will be hard to top.

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Refresh my memory… was there a similar “RAY-CISS!” outcry over movies like, say, Django Unchained, Inglorious Basterds, or other antiWhite revenge porn?

      I didn’t think so.

      Like

      • Ironsides says:

        Gloating admiration would be nearer the mark, IIRC, though I don’t pay a lot of attention to movie (((critics))) a lot of the time.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I think they are inventing criticism to generate discussion and give it street cred with it’s target audience. This is Hollywood afterall.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Point remains, Danger, (((they))) didn’t attempt to garner any such “street cred” with the aforementioned Tarantino dreck… which was overtly far more racist… just not the (((wrong kind))), I suppose.

        Like

      • Ironsides says:

        They’re just trying to cash in on the Alt-Right. Which means they consider us big enough to be worth baiting into buying tickets with a few random howls.

        If things went far enough right, (((they))) would go down trying to sell us jackboots. It’s like a caricature.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        If (((they))) truly wanted to cash in on the Alt-R, (((they))) would be more accurate in their racial representation of villains and make Kersey’s kills proportionate to actual FBI crime stats.

        Then the shrieks of the shrikes might have some merit… ’cause stats be racist, amirite? 😉

        Like

    • The Philosopher Redux says:

      Still good though. Most people can read between the lines when the radio host talks about ‘crime in chicago’.

      Did you know the original deathwise was a real alt right movie. Same as taxi driver.

      Travis Bickle was alt right before Tyler Durden.

      Like

  28. cortesar says:

    Suburbs of Rome
    Italians are fed up but where is El Duce

    Like

  29. Off topic but here goes…

    I predict that in 10-15 years time, “Sugar Daddy” type websites will be as popular as regular online dating websites.

    It is the natural evolution from where we are now….

    Liked by 1 person

    • Cracker says:

      sad to think that’s the direction things are going but you’re probably right

      Like

    • SteveRogers42 says:

      Unless (((they))) are able to categorize it as “human trafficking”.

      http://projects.seattletimes.com/2017/eastside-prostitution-bust/

      Like

    • ML says:

      Already exists. Check out “extra lunch money”. Prepare to be totally demoralized, no Jews needed.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Ironsides says:

      “Extra Lunch Money.” And to think I just ran into some fool quacking about the Alt-Right “disrespects” women “as much as our enemies.”

      What the hell is there to respect?

      Liked by 2 people

      • Cracker says:

        yep, there have always been paid whores but there was at least a stigma around it so they were the minority of women. now they are quickly becoming the majority because they get positive feedback and attention for it. pretty gross actually.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        they actually like jesus said loving everyone
        and its progressive because they are equal opportunity anyone can fuck em

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        And to think I just ran into some fool quacking about the Alt-Right “disrespects” women “as much as our enemies.”

        What the hell is there to respect?

        Point taken…

        But after awhile the vicious cycle of “They suck!” on both sides just spirals us all downward.

        Somewhere, somebody has to break the cycle… maybe drop a little bit of pride and rancor, think about the good things first, rather than lasering in on only the bad..

        Maybe this is the core message that Christ was trying to tell us.

        Of course, it takes a super-human effort much of the time… as as one of the favorite yeggs ’round chere once wrote, most of us are all-too-human.

        The interwebs don’t help… they’re an amplifier of the worst aspects of the human condition. Like some supermarket tabloid on steroids, and nary a library in town for counterbalance.

        Go with God, fellows… and steel. 😉

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        I get pissed at my two bitches out of jealousy sometimes cause I can’t own the pussy totally but they do make a bunch of other dudes lives a little happier when not with me he he he

        Liked by 1 person

  30. blowme1 says:

    “Younger men are drawn to older women as much as older men are drawn to younger women.”

    From the article.

    I almost just lost a lung from laughing after reading that line.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Mean Mr. Mustard says:

      Young men are drawn to older women like young wolves are drawn to elderly hooved prey.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Revenge of the Scyth says:

      The idea of a milf is titillating

      But most post-wall women aren’t Demi Moore or Sofia Vergara.

      Liked by 2 people

      • wolfie65 says:

        There is a very small percentage, maybe 1-3%, of women in their 40s or 50s who still look good, especially when dolled up to the 9s,in a dimly lit bar and after the young guy’s had a few.
        Since all women, regardless of age, are drawn to men under 30 (the younger, the better) like the proverbial moths to the flame, he doesn’t even have to work for it, which will seem like a nice change after the millions upon millions of hoops the young hotties he actually WANTS made him jump through.
        If he’s lucky, her genes are good enough that he doesn’t wake up in the morning, looks over and d13s from shock.

        Like

      • oink says:

        The “milf” and its “hot azn chick” sibling ((concepts)) are risible on their face

        like a decade before any red pill I mocked at a Brazilian dude blabbering about hot azn chks (“Dude, you’re … BRAZILIAN!”)

        Like

      • ML says:

        You guys are such prudes. Like none of you would throw one into a lusty 45 year old if you had nothing else to do.

        Kinda reminds me of ex-girlfriends who act extra anti-Nazi after dating me. I would NEVER.

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Look at Demi or Sofia up close and, without the makeup and photo-shopped imaging, they are not attractive, guaran-damn-teed. 20 years ago, yes. Now…it is all smoke and mirrors.

        Like

      • Kaminsky says:

        I knew someone who saw Pamela Anderson live in person at a café in the morning somewhere and said she looked just awful, and this was about 10-12 years ago.

        Also, “hot Asian chick” is a very real thing. Go clubbing in China. Lean bodies, tits, ass everywhere. All very fun. Don’t recommend marriage though.

        Like

    • modsquad says:

      When I was 14 I was drawn to 20 year old women.
      When I was 20 I was drawn to 20 year old women.
      When I was 30 I was drawn to 20 year old women.
      When I was 40 I was drawn to 20 year old women.
      Et cetera.

      Liked by 1 person

      • itsme says:

        heh

        a few years ago i went on a cruise. most of the passengers were retirees. most of the female crew looked to be in their 20’s – many were decent looking and some were legit hotties (eastern european).

        nearly all the old farts would shamelessly flirt with them, often well in earshot of their old shrivelled wives.

        female beauty and youth are recognized by men of all ages. old men especially since women in their age bracket contrast so starkly against the young fillies.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Mistral says:

        >When I was 40 I was drawn to 20 year old women.

        I will be 50 in a few weeks and yeah, 20 year old women. And you and I are not alone:

        http://www.businessinsider.com/dataclysm-shows-men-are-attracted-to-women-in-their-20s-2014-10

        Whoever tells women that they can whore it up and work some shit job in a cubicle, drink like fish – so common that it’s called getting “White Girl Wasted” – and go ride a mile of cock and then “Mr. Big” is going to bend his knee and beg them to marry him is NOT doing them a service.

        Out in the World of Men, suddenly what MEN want matters, and it’s not 52 y.o. tranny-grannies.

        Women have paid a high price for feminism. They got everything they thought they wanted and they’re still not happy.

        Like

      • Democritus says:

        The Litany of Truth.

        Like

      • Kaminsky says:

        The saddest looking man (American) I’ve ever seen was on the beach in Rio with his 50 year old whale. Teen and twenty something Brazilian girls in thongs all around. His wife sat next to him shaped like a white Hershey’s kiss. Her ass just spread out over the sand like a massive jellyfish. The old guys in the manosphere who crow about how they’ve kept their wives in line for 30 plus years are just not getting it. It’s all about 25 and under. If you have to pay for it as you get into your fifties, so be it.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Sentient says:

        Sounds like you pay for it Kam…

        Like

      • Kaminsky says:

        Sentient,

        I’ll say it once and you can take it or leave it. You’re the most blue pill guy in the manosphere. You just aren’t getting it at all. You’ve mistaken your ‘hand’ over your ancient, optionless wife (who is no longer even in the SMP) for being a redpill all-star. You’re not. You pedestalized and you’re going down as yet more fodder for the FI. You served the FI. Better to just admit it. You try to steer young guys down the same road just to lessen the sting of regret that is just under the surface with you. Admit that your life was devoured by the FI and MAN UP!

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Well (((Kaminsky))), if you ain’t m-a-r-r-i-e-d yourself you shouldn’t talk on the subject.

        Yeah, the world knows a 40-something and 50-something woman isn’t 25, thank you for bringing that to our attention.

        But a good woman that WAS indeed a 7 or better in her twenties, who gave you fine sons, stuck by your side for decades, and kept herself fit and desirable… helped by the psychological boost of “good w-i-f-e goggles” in the h-u-s-b-a-n-d’s eye, with fond memories over the years…

        Hell, man… life is still pretty damn good… and whatever man disses all that and flies the freak flag high for poosey-uber-alles, well…

        Not my kind of man… just hop on the boat to Africa right now, if that’s the kind of country you want.

        Give me 10K families like the one I described, and I’ll start Western Civilization over from the ground floor.

        You cynical fucks who have no w-i-f-e… no children… no property… nothing besides your dick… have got to just STFU when you’re talking to men with greater experience in life, and far more accomplishment.

        You fairy.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        Kam is angry his shilling ass was called out at TRM and he fled…

        Kam like I said over there… Don’t get married if you don’t have hand in a relationship. Nothing BP about that and not encouraging guys to get married.

        Hell I’m encouraging a lot of you simps to just keep jerking it to porn amd not reproduce at all… The risk is too great for US…

        Like

  31. Carlos Danger says:

    Like

  32. I’m not a game denialist. But not everybody can acquire game just like becoming a pro athlete or rocket scientist is out of reach for most people.

    Like

    • Ironsides says:

      True, but a lot of guys are probably perfectly happy with going from frequent failure to modest success, and don’t need a notch count in the hundreds. Just like being trim, healthier, and more active is a good result from an improved exercise regimen, without becoming a world-class athlete.

      “Minor alpha” or “beta with enough alpha characteristics for decent success with women” is a lot better than “flat-out beta,” just like “in-shape and healthy” beats “overweight, ailing slob.”

      Liked by 2 people

    • oink says:

      “I’m not a game denialist But”

      so you are

      Liked by 1 person

      • oink says:

        what other gems you have for betas reading these here comments?

        maybe that weightlifting does not increase self-confidence?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Keyboard Warrior says:

        Not at all. I’m just saying that things have to be seen in perspective and guys have to be realistic. Working on your Game will improve your life just like training your vertical will make you jump higher. But some people just benefit more from training than others.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        “… But some people just benefit more from training than others.”

        yes, some people will start bedding 9s instead of 5s.

        other people will start bedding 5s instead of their right hand.

        what’s bad about it?

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Usually with comments starting with, “I’m . . ., but . . . .”, everything before the “but” is a lie. More accurately, everything before the “but” is totally opposite what the person really believes. Folks on all parts of the political spectrum use it. “I’m all for free speech, but . . . .” (No, you’re really not). “I don’t have anything against Muslims, but . . . .” (Yeah, be honest for once in your cucky life, and say you hate the bastards), “I’m not in favor of illegal immigration, but . . . .” (Yeah, we you want to give the parasites citizenship, asshole), etc.

        Liked by 1 person

      • mendo says:

        @JR, Dennis Miller had a bit about that regarding Obummer. Gay Mullatto would always to the “I….but” bit and Miller said he knew that everything before but was hogwash and everything after was even more hogwash.

        Once you figure out these fuckers speech patterns, which seriously is like some repetitive program, you know how to evaluate the person as being totally shallow.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        an established speech pattern according to nlp science – “but” negates everything said previously, “and” amplifies it.

        which one would be received more favorably by an offshore prospect:

        1. you’re very tan, m’lady, but your pussy smells.
        2. you’re very tan, m’lady, and your pussy smells!

        Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      Realistically, ‘Game’ is a way for guys who have no looks, little if any social skills and still care way too much to fake the confidence it takes to hit on women, perhaps even some attractive ones.
      Which doesn’t mean they’re gonna score the winning touchdown – the 6’4 star QB will likely do that – but you definitely cannot win if you don’t even play.
      ‘Game’ is sort of like those ‘inspirational’ tapes.
      Useless in and of themselves, but if they inspire you to get off the couch and go running, you’ll eventually feel better.

      Like

      • Fagnavox says:

        Here he goes again

        Like

      • driveallnight says:

        This is why mom didn’t like you

        Like

      • The Philosopher Redux says:

        I think game works. I can be in situations where Ill remember what to do next. Or what question to ask. I think chateau maybe is a bit guilty of saying its to do with certain behaviours, lines or even an attitude.

        Its much more important to understand the theory of how a girl thinks and why she would think something or how she would react.

        For example, I know from game kino always works better than talking. Even if youre charismatic, I know kino always wins if you can do it.

        I take your point that people are learning to care what girls think too much, but thats already the situation. At least now they have control over it. After a few nothces, the anxiety disappears.

        Like

      • Mistral says:

        > ‘Game’ is a way for guys who have no looks, little if any social skills and still care way too much to fake the confidence it takes to hit on women, perhaps even some attractive ones.

        No, game is “Force Multiplier” for guys to maximize what they have to offer within the dating marketplace. Joe Neckbeard who spends his time on a gaming console, eating Cheetos and jacking off isn’t going to go out and score with women just by reading a PUA manual. But if he gets off his ass, cleans up his diet, works out, etc., *AND* he understands and internalized Game principles, he’s going to do better than he would otherwise. Maybe he will never do as well as a man who is a “genetic celebrity”, but he can become the best version of himself he can be, and maximize his own success, whatever that might be.

        Liked by 1 person

      • mendo says:

        he can become the best version of himself he can be

        ^This!

        Liked by 4 people

      • Sentient says:

        How the fu k do you know what game is? You clearly don’t have any.

        Like

      • Sentient says:

        For those who want to know what Game is and why it works:

        Game is the Female Language of Seduction. It is a verbal and physical form of communication. Guys that have early success with girls develop and understanding of this langauge, to differing degrees. The guys are called Naturals… Just like if you grew up in a German speaking home you would come to know some German…

        Try to speak with a native German speaker when you know none of the language. But German can be learned, to varying degrees depending ypon your will and intellect. And Game can be learned the same way and to the dame differing degree.

        The Chateau is one of the Rosetta Stones…

        And Wolfie is a closeted homo with no Game.

        Like

    • skorzecin150 says:

      Concern troll. No point to your post at all.

      EVERY man will gain from game, but, as with EVERYTHING in life, YMMV.

      Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        Agreed, Skorzecin. Game can ONLY make a man better with women, even if it is by small degrees. It certainly cannot make a pathetic loser a sex object, wanted by all women, and the envy of every man. So, there certainly is no harm, and only good to be gained, by learning basic game tactics. In fact, game skills work in other situations too, not just in male-female dynamics. Game makes you truly look at yourself, and forces you to at least try and turn yourself into a better person, and not just a shadow of what this POZ’d society creates of many men by constant blast of radioactive leftist, feminist dogma. Many of us look back at our thoughts and mannerisms when we were younger (even it is only a few years ago for many), and shake our heads at how clueless we were about certain things.

        Liked by 1 person

  33. […] digs up a bunch of scientific papers from the 80s, (back when men were men, and women were real women, and science was real fucking science), which […]

    Like

  34. Nads says:

    Forget about the personalities for a minute. I just love the photo. I mean, what healthy man wouldn’t want to get involved with a dried up spinster who still isn’t attractive after a professional makeup session, flattering outfits and spanx to hide their midsections, and a soft focus lense on the camera with angled poses.

    Imagine what they look like in real life. I take that back. Don’t try and imagine it.

    Like

  35. Passer by says:

    These women are really stupid and they do not understand how the world works. Why would men go for 45 – 50 year old infertile women with God knows how many hidden health and other issues?

    Men are programmed to like and be turned on by highly fertile women (which means healthy, young 20 – 29 year olds in good shape that have no psychological/addiction issues and have high quality bodies, as the quality of those bodies is very important for child rearing).

    Female intelligence and earnings (but not male intelligence and earnings) are negatively correlated with fertility, and there is an instinct that causes men to be indifferent to such women, as those women are not good for reproduction, no matter what other qualities they may have. Such women are with the highest probability to remain childless.

    Men have a very strong detector which makes them to “not particularly like” 45 – 50 year old women no matter how smart or solvent they are, because they are not fertile. This is built in in men and there is no getting away from that.

    It does not matter how “smart” or “solvent” you are if you are infertile, you still look disgusting to men. These stupid women do not understand that men do not choose women the way women choose men.

    The quality of the body and the young age turns on men, this is how it is programmed by nature, as those two strongly correlate with female fertility. Everything else is secondary in a woman. Do not delude yourself.

    Women are ok with older men because they are still fertile, but this is not how it works for men.

    Like

  36. Shark says:

    CH;

    Sorry, but your analysis is a FAILURE of over-extrapolation.
    Note that the subjects tested were all college undergrads (enrolled in into psych courses, at that!). That’s not a representative sample of anything but – – at most – – flaky women/men in their late teens and early twenties….which, if that’s your dating demographic, is a fairly representative sample, perhaps. But not for anything beyond that cohort.

    Experiment 1
    Method
    Subjects. Subjects were 46 women and 42 men enrolled in an introductory
    psychology course at a western state university.

    Experiment 2
    Method
    Subjects Subjects were 86 women and 82 men enrolled in introductory
    psychology at a western state university.

    Experiment 3
    Method
    Experiment 3 was identical to Experiment 2, with two exceptions.
    First, subjects (107 women and 96 men enrolled in introductory psychology
    at a western state university) were exposed to descriptions of
    same-sex as well as opposite-sex target persons.

    Experiment 4
    Method
    Subjects. Subjects were 114 women and 104 men enrolled in undergraduate
    psychology classes.

    [CH: while studies are hard to come by that would add weight your contention that WEIRDO social science studies cannot be extrapolated to general womanhood, i have written posts basically agreeing with your presupposition that as women age — and thus as women’s mate choice options dwindle — their willingness to settle for a boring non-asshole beta increases. also, what evidence do you have that the female study subjects in this experimental research were “flaky”. Rhetorical. You have none.]

    Like

  37. Someone says:

    The article is 10 years old, so you can only imagine how much they have aged since then. At best, they would made a nice f__k buddy for a younger guy assuming they had any charm. I’m guessing though they have become more demanding as they age.

    Like

  38. Dude says:

    Those broads on the cover look like crossdressers. I thought it was a bunch of dudes at first.

    Like

  39. Greg Eliot says:

    Judging by the beta thirst in meat world that I’ve seen, I’m sure even these broads get their share of male attention…

    … it just AIN’T the kind of males they want…

    … and can no longer even HOPE to interest.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      That’s probably what incites them more. That the men that do approach aren’t their dreamboat man and it only lets them know that they’ll never find him.

      Even though I’m sure there are some good beta chaps, but none of them are “cultured”, which I guess in girlspeak means never burning coal.

      WTF does “cultured” mean when women use it in the context of those old hags, or even in general?

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        “Cultured” in femspeak can mean anything from the most interesting man in the world fantasy to a guy who at least won’t fart or belch in their presence.

        Like

      • The Philosopher Redux says:

        Cultured means being familiar with liberal/jewish symbols like certain tv shows, political talking points and certain jew promoted figures like de grasse tyson or the like. I’m not kidding.

        Liked by 1 person

      • plumpjack says:

        I have a neighbor who is an in-shape-ish, melted-butterfaced, 51yo polyamorous cat lady. the string of hapless betas who come through to, basically, fix a few things around the house in exchange for sex and company, never ceases to amaze.

        these are guys, who, in my father’s generation, would have been respected members of the community and have more than a few grandchildren. but they were born too soon to know the true nature of women, too late to lock down a good woman, and probably too late to change course. they’re in that SMV no man’s land where they’re still following the rules of the old, one-man-one-woman social contract, paying old-time premium prices (their skill, time, and labor) for an overpriced, overused, overshared product.

        I feel sorry for these guys, but helping them would be difficult. besides the fact that I avoid my energetic black hole cat lady neighbor like my life depends on it (because it does), these guys are so unbelievably supplicating that it’s hard to imagine how to wake them out of it. they’re rule-followers, and they may as well be drugged. like an addict, they haven’t even admitted to themselves yet how powerless they are in the new sexual marketplace.

        if I had the time I might be able to help a few of these guys, but as ttclod said on a previous thread, there isn’t time to save them all. better to invest in your own family, and the young.

        that said, if I ever bump into one of these guys away from the cat lady black hole and they ask me for help, I’ll help them by sending them to realtalk sites like this one. but they will have to demonstrate some willingness to help themselves, as all grown men should.

        along these lines, the thought occurred to me that treating beta behavior as an addiction might be a useful tactic to reach the legions of blind, blue pill addicts in our ailment-obsessed society. maybe a twelve step program to go from from blue pill to red pill….

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        I have a neighbor who is an in-shape-ish, melted-butterfaced, 51yo polyamorous cat lady. the string of hapless betas who come through to, basically, fix a few things around the house in exchange for sex and company, never ceases to amaze.

        Yup… that’s what I’ve been trying to tell these yeggs… the beta thirst out there makes the lost-in-the-desert scene of Lawrence of Arabia look like Waterworld.

        And this is why we lose and will keep losing… until resources become scarce, and local immediate protection becomes necessity.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “the beta thirst out there makes the lost-in-the-desert scene of Lawrence of Arabia look like Waterworld”

        heh!

        thirsty beta meets sexually-receptive-catlady at 1:30:

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “they’re rule-followers”

        This was one of the glaring weaknesses of the White Race which the Frankfurt School identified very early on and has been manipulating for well over a century now.

        If certain Whites are hard-wired to follow rules, then the (((Rules-Makers))) will determine the entirety of those Whites’ behavior.

        So all the Frankfurt School had to do was seize control of the Rules-Making institutions.

        It’s also why it’s so metaphysically important to the Frankfurt School quash the internet and put and end to all of this Crimethink which we maul-righters are publicizing.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        to quash

        Like

      • The Philosopher Redux says:

        Most white men on the aspy spectrum are germanic or actual germans. In europe theres an old stereotype that german men have no sense of humour/socially clueless.

        I think youll find med, celtic and slavic men are a lot less rule following. But obviously their countries are poorer as a result.

        Scottish men live side by side with english germanics in the same country (empire) and are about 1/3 as rich.

        Where do you think trump gets his fire from? His scottish mother or germanic father?

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        TPR, about 18 months ago, we were talking a great deal about how the formulaic programmable rules-abiding midwestern Lutherans were all dutifully voting for Lyin’ Ted, because Lyin’ Ted was simply regurgitating the rules which the Lutherans had been taught to obey.

        Whereas The Emperor G0d King was speaking Common Sense, which appealed to the Scots & Scots-Irish [of the South].

        tl;dr == Deductivism [obey The Narrative at all costs] -vs- Empiricism [wake up and pay attention to WTFE M0ther Nature is screaming at you]

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        From what I’ve read of Trump’s mother, I’m sure he got his passion and his Common Sense from her, whereas I am equally certain that he got his materialism & his fastidiousness [& probably at least part of his IQ] from his father.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bolg says:

        lol.

        http://sofiaglobe.com/2017/02/09/serbian-publication-donald-j-trump-is-from-the-bulgarian-stara-planina-2/

        even if not a bulgar, one thing is for sure, TGE doesn’t follow rules, he makes them.

        although Trun’s population does consist of scandinavian pows from the 4th crusade.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        Captain Obvious
        “they’re rule-followers”
        This was one of the glaring weaknesses of the White Race which the Frankfurt School identified very early on and has been manipulating for well over a century now.”””””””’

        well some of the whites anyway
        lifes kind of a joke in that respect

        Like

      • Vagina dominator says:

        @ The Philosopher Redux

        “Most white men on the aspy spectrum are germanic or actual germans. In europe theres an old stereotype that german men have no sense of humour/socially clueless. ”

        You may know the financial site “Wolf Street” by wolf richter, a German I believe,living in San Francisco (and m*rried to a Japanese) He used to have a lot of trouble with people “joking” on his site and him not understanding it was joking. He’d admonish people for thd foolish things they’d said. Then they’d have to say “just joking”. It was embarrassing.

        He doesn’t do that now. He has clearly got someone to read the comments first now and red-line attempts at humor. He then chimes in with a “Ho ho, that’s a good one” comment, which is almost as inappropriate.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Germans are indeed more aspy. My Irish insolence has always annoyed them to no end because I won’t cut my nose off to spite my face for the sake of maintaining process discipline.

        Like

    • Vagina dominator says:

      @ The Philosopher Redux

      “Most white men on the aspy spectrum are germanic or actual germans. In europe theres an old stereotype that german men have no sense of humour/socially clueless. ”

      You may know the financial site “Wolf Street” by wolf richter, a German I believe, living in San Francisco (and married to a Japanese) He used to have a lot of trouble with peple “joking” on his site and him not understanding it was joking. He’d admonish people for thd foolish things they’d said. Then they’d have to say “just joking”. It was embarrassing.

      He doesn’t do that now. He has clearly got someone to read the comments first now and red-line attempts at humor.He then chimes in with a “Ho ho,that’s a good one” comment, which is almost as inappropriate.

      Like

    • skorzecin150 says:

      @PJ, I prefer this version of LoA:

      Like

  40. On thing they wont study is the effect of violent behaviour on a woman’s attraction. I bet if they had two men fight, the winner would increase in attractiveness versus the loser, even if the loser was good looking and the winner looked like Kurt Eichenwald.

    But if the loser had a higher social standing to begin with, she would overlook the loss. She will ‘reframe’ the loss as ‘a bad day at the office’ type argument.

    The result would confirm the natural conclusion from this study – dominance.

    But up until the 20th century, dominance wasn’t about gladhandling bros and selfies with high status guys. It was half physical. You really needed to look like could hurt someone.

    Many R selected black, arab and some white or latino women only go for guys that look like they can at least physically harm someone and not care.

    Liked by 1 person

    • The Philosopher Redux says:

      The real lesson is hit the gym, boost Test, do contact sport or learn how to defend yourself.

      Women want men. Being a man is hard to fake. Men don’t have an equivalent of make up.

      Many men won’t feel comfortbale saying the things chateau says because they are not physiologically or psychologically men. So they can’t think like that. That has to be fixed first.

      People that have mental health or other intrinsic issues need to sort those out even before the hard work.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “contact sport”

        Another angle [for arousing the gina tinglezzzezes] is to take them on sh00ting dates. It’s easier for dudes with access to rural areas, but even in urban areas, you can go on a date to an indoor sh00ting r@nge, and rent some p!stols & rev0lvers and whatnot.

        Getting the chick around both you and controlled g*np0wder expl0si0ns will quickly throw her hindbrain into Life -vs- Death mode, which, in turn, will moiston the vag into friggin Lake Superior.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “Another angle [for arousing the gina tinglezzzezes] is to take them on sh00ting dates.”

        where do you think the first guy who ever shot a high-speed projectile out of a long tube got the idea?

        Liked by 1 person

      • oink says:

        if you ever find yourself mixed with a “let u and him fight” skank (aka drama whore):
        Run! … don’t walk

        OTOH if, once the tempers get hot, your partner is:

        “oink: we’re leaving! Now!”
        maybe she’s a keeper

        my 2 cents

        Like

      • Johnny Redux says:

        I will add that nothing builds some good, solid basic confidence like being able to beat the hell out of a heavy bag for a good 15 minutes. You may not know the strength of your jaw to take a blow, but you will have confidence that, if need be, your fists are nice weapons always ‘at hand’.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        I could have physically beat my hands and arms to shattered pulp

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        oink
        if you ever find yourself mixed with a “let u and him fight” skank (aka drama whore):
        Run! … don’t walk
        OTOH if, once the tempers get hot, your partner is:
        “oink: we’re leaving! Now!”
        maybe she’s a keeper
        my 2 cents”””””””

        yea I was seeing white light over the chick in jail
        which still in control
        but yea her positive attitude and calmness was a good thing

        Like

    • SteveRogers42 says:

      Check out these guys:

      Like

    • Reb says:

      That’s me

      Like

  41. Vincent says:

    “maybe that weightlifting does not increase self-confidence?”

    WTF? And if this website is so bad, WYF are you doing here?

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Not that oink needs my defending, but I think he was merely making a wry comment to the poster who began with “I’m not a game denialist, but”.

      oink, like several of the yeggs ’round chere, is an acquired taste. 😉

      Like

      • Vincent says:

        As long as he keeps it kosher.

        Like

      • oink says:

        kan’t help u with da kosher, but …
        u could help yourself with some work on yer reading comprehension
        .
        otoh, 4 what it’s worth
        .
        My path to Christ and to the redpill was luminated by two zhyds (Nicolae Steinhardt and Moldbug respectively)
        .
        So I ain’t gonna piss on ((them)) indiscriminately anytime soon, no matter how arduous and disgusting the exploits of ((tribemembers)) in MSM or here at the Chateau.
        .
        Albeit on occasion the likes of Mo-“I fap to goydeath porn”-heL do provide a glimpse of the “oh, that’s why”

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        He makes this terrific bacon and lobster bisque… swears it’s kosher, I don’t know HOW he does it.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        duck, anabaptists incoming

        Like

  42. arminius says:

    Funny, saw the pic and thought, “Well Laura isn’t too bad.” Then looked around the image and realized that she’s the youngest, by a significant margin.

    Like

  43. Rman says:

    Hey CH, I believe this is related. Was listening to Jordan Peterson’s Biblical Series Part III and I stumbled upon this:

    “Unless the big rat lets the little rat win 30% of the time, the little rat will not invite him to play.”

    Maybe this also applies to man/woman dominance play during courtship and relationships. Calibrate so as to apply vulnerability game 30% of the time in order to keep her playing.

    Like

  44. Days of Broken Arrows says:

    Olympic gymnast Aly Reisman just posted a pic of her kissing her dog on the mouth. This represents the left’s move into pushing bestiality after foisting gay marriage and transsexuals upon us. Sounds like a joke, but I’m not kidding.

    Like

  45. The Philosopher Redux says:

    Yeah cardio is bad for the bunnies. I think cardio is great if youre really out of shape and need to burn the fat quick with a good diet.

    But if you are average, you should be lifting.

    I notice omegas/’losers’ love cardio machines usually. The rowing machine will always be occupied by an aspergers guy hahaha.

    Like

    • The Philosopher Redux says:

      You can tell aspergers very quickly by dress sense, even in the gym. Even poor people, like blacks, can dress. Because blacks have social intelligence. The only people that dress as bad as aspergers people are people with mental illnesses or drug addictions.

      Like

    • oink says:

      You should weightlift ESPECIALLY when you’re overweight

      Like

    • Revenge of the Scyth says:

      Actually, lifting is better for overweight men.

      The excess fat means they’re always in a caloric surplus. Fat boys can shed weight and pack on muscle simultaneously.

      Like

  46. As a man who just turned forty-four I find myself getting increasingly repulsed at the wrinkled hags my age demanding I pay top dollar for their used gashes and shaming me for my love of young, tight meat.

    Like

  47. The Philosopher Redux says:

    On the spectrum between aspergers and schizophrenia, lies most white people. Most blacks to the right. Most east asians to the left. People on the right are impossible to brainwash. If you notice, most blacks are less SJW than most whites. Blacks are unbrainwashable. But they can believe in ghost stories and religions…..just not orders, rules, social norms and authority figures.

    Because of their latent schizophrenia.

    Like

  48. Lichthof says:

    One time I was out for drinks a few years back with work and a dindus we hired (who was soon fired for his shit work) was talking smack about some girl he was banging.
    I just blurted in a drink fuelled buzz that fingering a woman was like pulling back a cabbage leaf.

    I totally forgot the HB 8 white respectable upper class girl in our office was sitting beside me.
    I was crestfallen as I was very blue pill then that I made the comment but looking back now , that comment actually ramped up her attraction for me.
    I was clueless at the time.

    Like

  49. Vincent says:

    ROFL today, oink…

    Like

  50. Carlos Danger says:

    Liked by 1 person

    • oink says:

      yes, all blame the scapegoats (foul animals, they are!)
      be a good cuck. hate on those middle management ((types)),

      that’s why Massa pays them, that’s part of the job description, to take the heat from the fieldni**ers (us, that is)

      let’s never, ever, touch upon the disaster of re-formation; or the triumph of “liberteegalitefraternite OU LA MORT” Hell-on-Earth. if we are to ever discuss them, is only about the ((tribal)) involvement in them, never our OWN eye-beams.

      P.S.
      not once did you bring up the Veneration of Virgin Mary or of the Saints; or defended the Catholic practice on this.

      some catholic!.

      Like

      • oink says:

        Unitarian universalism? Jesus Christ-less “Curchianity”?!? what is that?
        .
        pay no attention to the man behind the courtain sheeple!
        .
        pay attention to those who are paid to distract you!

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Can you JIDF goat-phuckers please get your d@mned story straight?

        Like

      • Revenge of the Scyth says:

        oink > 1D jewzdiddit Captain Obvious

        Like

      • oink says:

        sorry Cap’n that re-formation is not giving the expected results

        But

        This here humptydumpty has bigger problems than the ((particulars)) of its middle management

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        0>>>> inconsequential jew

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I love the smell of bacon in the morning! Oink, this is where your vaunted 115 IQ lie breaks down. Jews don’t produce intellectuals of this caliber, they only pretend to. This guy can’t get a teaching job and he is probably the brightest liberal arts professor in the US and is a world class scholar. Camille Paglia is a child in comparison but all the credit goes to her ilk.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I’m especially looking forward to seeing you impaled on the Mall. I hope to hear you babble that crap all the way until the pale breaks through your mouth and then- wait for it… a sudden miraculous silence! I think it will create a standing ovation, Such a theatrical ending. Satan will be proud!

        Like

      • oink says:

        O, hai! Cathcuck,

        Is it something I said? :duckface:

        PS I thought y’all ubermensch were more into lemeleking (aka whole burnt offering) yer opponents to Baal during “Renaissance”

        Impaling was more of ours, Eastern untermenschen, specialty

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Oink, you were doing okay for awhile, but I see now you’re back on that odd jews-take-their-orders-from-the-goy-elite bandwagon.

        So tell us some names of these Protestant puppet-masters, and which particular (((puppets))) and agitprop outlets they control.

        Because I gotta be honest here… Protestants (and Catholics) are open targets in the comedic and political realms of EVERY major form of media in meat world..

        The only place you’re allowed to realtalk about them (((frontrunners))) and still keep your job is when you do it anonymously in the echo chambers and far corners of Cyberia.

        Sounds like some real 4D chess them Puritans are playin’, amirite?

        Like

      • oink says:

        “some real 4D chess”

        No, just some good ole fashion tribal cohesion

        basically what Bolg said

        The “every f*king time,” but with anabaptists (like the 10% legacy admissions at Ivvies.)

        Like

  51. Rocky says:

    I drive a lot. Looking for Red Pill Audiobooks. Suggestions?

    Like

  52. Outis says:

    In other news, water is wet.

    Like

    • ML says:

      When I first got on the net, that was my handle.

      Like

      • Outis says:

        I know. And you were a real cunt with it on VNN. Kind of like the cunts in here you now pretend to be morally superior to.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Oh that was tasty bait. Please tell me your hook goes deeper though.

        Like

      • Outis says:

        How’s Janice?

        Like

      • ML says:

        Public info. But what is it you want?

        Like

      • Outis says:

        I hope she’s healthy. I really mean that.

        And I hope you’re healthy too, apart from EDS, that is.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Oh, I told everyone here about that myself. Several times I think. I even posted a picture — zero comment. Welp, if that’s all you came for, cheers to my fan from the VNN days! NO JEWS JUST RIGHT!

        Like

      • Outis says:

        I meant what I said. I’m not your enemy. Why are you here anyway? You said you couldn’t stand this shit anymore. Trying to fill that Joe-shaped vacuum? I’m always there when you’re ready to stop sulking about harsh truths.

        Like

      • ML says:

        I have no need or desire to speak to you. And that doesn’t necessarily imply a low opinion; but dribbling bits of personal info (that I’ve already made known, because who cares?) in an attempt to embarrass me certainly suggests that one may be necessary.

        I will instead dredge up some goodwill toward men and convince myself that that isn’t what you were trying to do.

        The only harsh truth that matters is that I’ve actually had two friends like you in my life: a shared worldview, almost a private language, as if we were the last two men on earth with our eyes open, marooned together in modernity.

        The problem in both cases was that my friend was basically a sexually frustrated prick with occasional delusions of grandeur who thought it acceptable to lash out at me periodically for one reason or another. Sometimes my fault, usually not. What’s it matter? I don’t do that to friends, and in my loneliness I was too forgiving. No more.

        It didn’t help that in both cases, my friend enjoyed a better standard of living than I ever did. When there’s a class divide, unless one is able and willing to reach down to lift the other up, it might as well be two different species, in my opinion.

        Now I would kindly ask that you don’t force any further airing of former friends’ dirty laundry. How I amuse myself online really isn’t your business, nor giving out my personal info, for that matter. Just leave me the fuck alone.

        Like

      • Outis says:

        Hey, I didn’t plan this. I wrote a comment and you responded to it. It’s on you.

        That’s always been your problem: thin skin and thick skull, incapable of recognizing that you also lash out at others for one reason or another. But you think you’re so morally superior… Everyone else here can see it too. You know that saying that if you run into an asshole in the morning…? Everyone’s an asshole but you, that must be it.

        Believe me, I could do much worse if I really cared enough. I’m just amused that this happened and it bothered you this much. Goodbye, old friend.

        Like

      • Revenge of the Scyth says:

        Speaking of VNN, Alex Linder is the only reason to be on gab.ai

        Like

      • ML says:

        Great. Another place where you can be called a Jew for anything.

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      You two got a confession to make or something?

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Go figger… yet both of these bozos say the men of the chateau are the cunts.

        If I didn’t know better, I’d say this was the script to one of them thar daytime soaps.

        Scratch a shill and you invariably come up with some psycho-drama.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

  53. cortesar says:

    Like

  54. cortesar says:

    This is happening in Venezuela right now. If the #DeepState succeeds in ousting @realDonaldTrump, expect the same. pic.twitter.com/HC7wBOc0ys

    — Julian Assange 🔹 (@JuliannAssange) August 4, 2017

    Like

  55. ML says:

    Michelle Carter sentenced to fifteen fucking months …. and granted a stay.

    Is this really the time for even tongue in cheek paean to “pussy”?

    Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      so her probation is be a good girl and if she tells another dude to get back in truck and die she will maybe have to do 15 months?

      Like

    • Revenge of the Scyth says:

      The fact that she even got prison time only reinforces the insane belief that women are moral agents.

      Like

  56. cortesar says:

    This just happened to one of my friends pic.twitter.com/u3hMMgELX9

    — Kathy Zhu (@PoliticalKathy) August 4, 2017

    Like

  57. Random Guy says:

    If I had to give any advice to these women it would be this:

    1.) Jane your not in near as a good shape as you think you are, hit the gym, hit the squats or at least do thirty minutes of kettlebell swings twice a week

    2.) Find these guys who are “more than a little over weight”; tell them that if they are willing to get the weight off and get in shape your will actually consider dating them.

    Maybe even tell them you’ll get involved in going to the gym and helping them have motivation to actually exercise.

    Cook their meals for them or go to their houses and make meals prepared ahead of time so they will start eating healthier.

    Think of these men as a project and just be brutally honest with them right from the gate.

    But at the same time; give them at most “3 strikes and your Out” if they fail to commit to doing better.

    3.) Be prepared for the possibility that after you turn them around they’ll dump you and go out with someone else younger and better looking.

    Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      3.) Be prepared for the possibility that after you turn them around they’ll dump you and go out with someone else younger and better looking.””””””””

      every fucking time

      Liked by 2 people

      • Random Guy says:

        Quite possibly but after having someone actually help them out, dedicate time to them and improve their lives that much.

        They might feel some form of attachment to them, if the lady is taking care of all their needs and they aren’t so confident in their ability to maintain their new self without them.

        Especially if this woman is the best they’ve ever got and they were naturally supplicating beta-males on top of that.

        On the other hand; if they don’t have kids and still want to breed than yeah it’s almost a given they’ll drop her for someone younger who can still pop out strong and healthy kids.

        Like

  58. cortesar says:

    Remembering the Cronulla Riots of 2005

    Like

  59. Fox News’ Eric Bolling sent pictures of male genitalia to at least three female colleagues http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3574673/posts

    Like

  60. gunslingergregi says:

    text game?
    me wyd
    chick working
    me come over when done i’m alone building traps and shit
    chick haha traps for what?!
    me u lol home alone style
    chick lmao!!

    Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      chick really will come halfway to the serial killer
      he he he
      kidding
      well its actually true

      Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        chicks might just be actually harder than dudes on the zfg
        we just aint really exlplored that area very much

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        its my chickbuddy said she only loved two dudes her husband and someone else made a point of saying she never told last boyfriend she loved him
        even though dude all suicidal and shit without her
        oneitis and wanting to die over a chick that don’t love you dam
        I told her go see him she did
        I like the dude lol
        but yea she pretty big girl now

        Like

      • ML says:

        That in nearly all species more females than males pass on their genes is in fact the primordial ZFG.

        Like

    • Revenge of the Scyth says:

      My traps are retardedly overdeveloped and make my delts look small in comparison.

      Like

  61. unh says:

    Sassy equals gassy.

    Like

    • Kaminsky says:

      It actually does. “Sassy” girls are overcompensating for being fat. They’re fat due to excess sugar intake which causes gassiness.

      Like

  62. cortesar says:

    For the first time in its 380 years of operation, Harvard University will have an incoming freshman class where the majority of students are minorities
    and this including skypes

    https://www.dailystormer.com/harvard-incoming-class-is-a-majority-nonwhite-for-the-first-time-in-the-schools-380-year-history/

    Like

  63. cortesar says:

    New Skype killer 6.02 with additional features of removing neocohens
    Some may say that enhancement is redundant but when you start removing viruses it is always better to make sure that no parasite is left behind

    Liked by 1 person

    • skorzecin150 says:

      And these are the people (((Congress))) wants to sanction. Even back in the day, I respected the Russian Bear, hated (((communism))) of course, but I never had any trouble seeing the Russians as people. With all the positives and negatives that implies.

      And who doesn’t love kompot, amirite?

      Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Well, last week some (ahem) inside source assured us that, with the Awan arrest, the Paki pismire would start singing like a speckled grouse and all sorts of formal arrests and indictments of DNC bigwigs would be handed down by “Wed at the latest”… he even mentioned Mueller would play ball and get a pardon himself, ’cause he was somehow involved in it all.

      This week, the Russian investigation fake-news-that-just-won’t-die has amped up to the point where, no DNC or other gummint swamp rats were seen sporting orange, rather…

      Mueller convenes grand JURIES (not just one, mind you) and has started issuing subpoenas.

      Somebody put me wise… what part of “winning” did I miss? 😡

      Fuck alt-R “inside sources”, fuck /pol/chan/, and fuck this ghey earth.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Stop embarrassing yourself. It’s painful to watch.

        Liked by 1 person

      • streetsweeper says:

        “blackpilling is emotional incontinence”

        try these, Greg “All I Care About is the Fourteen Words!” Eliot:

        Liked by 1 person

      • streetsweeper says:

        Liked by 1 person

      • streetsweeper says:

        they come in a few sizes. I’m guessing you want XXL. bulk prices are available.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Danger/dweebstreep, you’re the one embarrassing yourself..

        Or maybe you can enlighten us all why subpoenas are being issued and grand juries are being convened for everyone BUT the swamp rats? Where were your ZH and InfoWars links predicting THESE subpoenas? All I kept hearing was how this Russian bullshit was already discredited and the likes of (((CNN))) were “destroyed”.

        WTF happened? Why are OUR people getting hauled before a grand jury?

        Or you can just keep posting more lying links and videos from sources that obviously don’t know their ass from a hole in the ground…

        …. much like yourself.

        Like

      • streetsweeper says:

        Greg “I’m not a blackpiller!” Eliot says:

        “Danger/dweebstreep, you’re the one embarrassing yourself..

        WTF happened? Why are OUR people getting hauled before a grand jury?”

        there are a number of ways you, as a supposedly grown man, could answer those questions.

        you could, for example:
        – post an alternative source that explains things from a different point of view, which you deem more credible.
        – encourage patience and forbearance in difficult times, when we’re outnumbered and seemingly outgunned
        – remain silent

        instead you choose to attack and discredit the messenger, who is supposedly one of your allies.

        tell us how you’re not embarrassing yourself by taking the lowest possible position: disheartened, vilifying, non-contributing, disloyal critic?

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Apparently you come from a world where a man can report and promise anything, and when it doesn’t happen, just say “oh well”?

        The only types I know who don’t want accountability for their words are women and shitskins… which are you?

        As far as “blackpilling” goes, we’ve had this discussion before.

        Holding people accountable for their promises and calling them on it when they lie outright or talk out their ass and don’t deliver isn’t blackpilling.

        Blackpilling is when one automatically assumes the most cynical position or naysays as kneejerk reaction, in the effort to demoralize.

        The people making these false reports, promising us that the swamp is going to get drained, and even putting a timeframe on it, which never materializes, are the blackpillers, distraction squid-inkers, and agitprop shills.

        Learn to use the language properly, and stop making me call you stupid.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Every time I try to correct your misuse of the term “blackpilling”, I get sent to mod, go figger.

        The world I come from, when people tell you something is going to happen, and then not only does it NOT happen, but the exact opposite occurs, is a world of accountability.

        The liars and bullshitters get pilloried… not the ones calling them out on it.

        Apparently in your world, a person can lie outright or talk out his ass without repercussion or having to back up when he claims.

        Women, children, and shitskins don’t like being held accountable… indeed, when taken to task, they squawk like they’re the victim and the other guy is at fault.

        Keep telling on yourself, fool.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        He’s not me. But I got a chuckle out of this barrage all the same.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Here’s your answer. The US attorney on the Awan case is your gal’s brother- Steven Wasserman. I think you will find this to be a consistent pattern explaining why there is so little forward progress. You could have come up with this too. That’s how its done over at Vox and it is something I like about that site.

        Like

      • Revenge of the Scyth says:

        Greg Eliot and sock accounts or Captain Obvious’ insistence that 70% of the internet is on the JIDF payroll..

        I don’t know which delusion is sadder.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Greg Eliot and sock accounts or Captain Obvious’ insistence that 70% of the internet is on the JIDF payroll..

        I don’t know which delusion is sadder.

        Riiiiiiiiiight… ain’t no sock puppies ’round chere, keep moving, nothing to see.

        Asshole, half of the ones that have been outed already admitted to it. And the timing and style patterns of the ones who haven’t admitted it are becoming quite obvious.

        (((shakin’ mah haid)))

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Here’s your answer. The US attorney on the Awan case is your gal’s brother- Steven Wasserman. I think you will find this to be a consistent pattern explaining why there is so little forward progress. You could have come up with this too. That’s how its done over at Vox and it is something I like about that site.

        Oh, fer cryin’ out LOUD!

        Could you be any more disingenuous?

        First of all, all your alt-R fake news echo chambers and youtubers are lying outright that he’s been assigned to the case. No such thing has occurred.

        Hannity, at least a somewhat credible source, explains that, yes, this Wasserman guy is a US attorney in DC, and he works in the violent crime and narcotics trafficking… and COULD be assigned… note COULD… because on the website there’s a mention that that division SOMETIMES handles short-term bank and credit card fraud.

        So, in the usual style of fake news, some speculation about what COULD happen is now fact, eh? Trying to say it’s already happened is a blatant lie.

        Wanna bet right now that this COULD turns into NO WAY?

        Second, where was all this information on the original articles and youtube videos that claimed “ALL arrests and formal indictments” were going to be handed down last week? Typical fake news patterns… when one thing blows up in your face, quickly switch over to the next chapter of conspiracy theory and squid ink.

        Last, what does this have to do with the other major point of Mueller, who was supposedly dead in the water,, now convening grand juries (plural) and handing out subpoenas like lottery tickets? According to all this “news” sources of the alt-R, the Russian investigation was supposed to be defunct and everyone involved, up to and including (((CNN))) discredited and “destroyed”.

        Grand juries and subpoenas are some serious doings… I thought ours was the side that was supposed to be doing the convening and subpoenaing… on everything from pizzagate to Hillary to Awan to etc., etc., etc.

        Don’t mistake my calling out all these lies as somehow being happy about it… I’m aggravated to no end that the real miscreants have held sway for so long, and now with Trump in office, justice was supposed to start happening.

        But all I get is the equivalent of lies and fake news from the people that are supposed to be our allies.

        So FUCK you and your own squid inking and disingenuous spreading of mis- and disinformation, Danger.

        We don’t need your kind.

        Like

  64. Just came across this subreddit, applicable to the post: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskWomenOver30/comments/6rcm2n/for_those_of_you_that_are_ready_to_settle_down/

    Single but of course they’re the complete package and no men meet their standards. Feel free to bask in chronic hamstering.

    Like

    • ML says:

      ” AptCasaNova30 – 35 • 1d
      I’m mostly just ok on my own and busy with my career. I honestly can’t see where dating, let alone a relationship, would fit into my life right now.

      Unless a relationship adds to my life and makes it better, I don’t see the point.

      I’m almost 35 and am rather done with dancing around the truth, ”

      Now at this point, I had hope that this one was about to look herself in the face and admit that she is simply useless to men, but

      ” being too accommodating and cajoling men into committment.

      I don’t want the bare minimum from a guy who expects me to do all the emotional labour and throw him a party because he did the dishes.

      My friends are quite fulfilling and I have my own hobbies and enjoy my own company. Unless you knock my socks off, I’m going to pass.”

      Like

      • The Tempestuous Man says:

        “And now I’m rapidly approaching 50, and the number of single men my age, +-5 or so years, who are single, stable, and who would make a good partner is beginning to approach zero. (Don’t forget chemistry and being attracted to him.) It kind of sucks but I just didn’t get mental/emotional shit together in time to have many choices. And I will not settle for someone who treats me like shit because I don’t have to.

        Most of the time, I’m cool with this, but sometimes being chronically single can be super tedious.”

        This was one of my favourites. The Wall is now undeniable, but yet will still not settle. Because, you know, it’s not like the guy will be settling with a 50 year old shriveled faggot of bones.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        the sad part is that none of them would have been happy if they’d settled for someone they didn’t really want either.

        none of us want to be stuck with someone we aren’t into. i’ve done that and it sucks.

        some are okay with having someone they don’t really like just so they aren’t alone but a lot people would rather be alone than do that. i’m one of them so i can kind of understand why they’d rather be alone than settle with someone that doesn’t do it for them.

        the big problem is that so many women are not attracted to any men enough to settle down with them young. part of it is that most men are pussified and unattractive to them, the other part is that girls are being raised to be unattractive to quality men.

        Like

      • Libertardian says:

        “Unless you knock my socks off, I’m going to pass.”

        This is the female equivalent of Melvin posting “I’m going to kick your ass,” in both cases when they’re face to face with Chad it’s another story.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      WGTOW?

      When everyone is going their own way, some are bound to bump into each other, amirite?

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      TTM, that subreddit reads like a 100% JIDF propaganda campaign. [And there are some obvious jewesses on there, recommending jew filth like “Shel Silverstein”].

      Do you suppose the Frankfurt School has so badly poisoned the minds of single White shiksa females that all SWSFs now babble away like JIDF trolls?

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Maybe even I’m too naive.

        If 100% of all (((J00livison & J00tube))) commercials now urge Shiksas to procreate with sub-humans, then why wouldn’t (((they))) also devote JIDF resources to encouraging Shiksas to stop br33ding and instead to embrace their futures as barren old cat-lady spinsters?

        Like

      • The Tempestuous Man says:

        They’re certainly inundated with the propaganda CO. It’s amazing how these womyn have hit the Wall, some well past it, and yet take no responsibility for why they’re cat owning spinsters. It’s all ‘men are children’, ‘they don’t text enough’ (hilarious), ‘im too intimidating’ etc etc.

        But of course, they’re happy and complete and wouldn’t want it any other way.

        (also see the one who was tired of constantly having to disclose she has hsv… just wow).

        Liked by 1 person

  65. Corvo says:

    “Unite the Right” rally on August 12th in Charlottesville, VA. We need a strong showing. Be there if you can!

    https://www.dailystormer.com/charlottesville-2-0-be-there-or-be-square/

    Would be extra lolzolzy to see a CH banner proudly flying in the shitlord legions.

    Like

  66. Corvo says:

    “Unite the Right” rally on August 12th in Charlottesville, VA. We need a strong showing. Be there if you can!

    Like

  67. Lichthof says:

    Faggot brown ‘British’ reporter visits Montana..

    “You don’t look British”

    Like

    • A comically smug mudblood British colonial trawling the American überbackwater for juicy televisable quotes from the resident rurrral hicks.

      Perfect. Just perfect.

      God, this is the best thing I’ve watched in the last month.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Send more please. Soon you will be hanging by your neck and we will be throwing trash at it.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Welcome to South Park mentality world, brought you by (((those folks))) who don’t control the airwaves.

        Like

      • King George III says:

        Carlos, there will never be a People’s Uprising. Why? Simple.

        First there was the American Revolution. A Merchant-Aristocrat-Alliance Uprising.

        Then there was Shay’s Rebellion. An Unpaid-Soldier’s Uprising. Put down like a dog. By George Washington himself, no less.

        The mass-immigration of German Catholics into the formerly American states of America. No People’s Uprising.

        Civil War. No People’s Uprising.

        The mass-immigration of Irishniggers into the formerly Germanic states of America. No People’s Uprising.

        The mass-immigration of Italians into the formerly Celtic-Germanic states of America. No People’s Uprising.

        The mass-immigration of Poles into the formerly Western states of America.

        The mass-immigration of Jews into the formerly European states of America.

        The Great Migration, viz., why there are Africans colonies in every major “American” city. No People’s Uprising.

        Then Civil Rights. No People’s Uprising.

        Then Ethnic Cleansing and ruination of Detroit. No People’s Uprising. Well, except for the rioting, rampaging niggers. Depending on your definition of people.

        Reagan. No People’s Uprising. Lulled them back to sleep, though.

        Since the year the Soviet Union fell, 60 million mestizos crossed the border to live on welfare and crime. No People’s Uprising.

        Obama literally, literally flying planeloads of Somalians into Minnesota. No People’s Uprising.

        Merkel importing 10 million fighting-age Moslem males into Germany. No People’s Uprising.

        The streets of Paris looking like this. No People’s Uprising.

        Are you noticing a pattern here?

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        If what you say is true. you wouldn’t be here.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        It’s not as rosy in Europe as you claim either. It’s a police state of the sort you dream of implementing here in the US. Pride goeth before the fall.

        Like

      • PA says:

        Talk of peasant uprisings misses the point. NonWhites are the “peasants” today, except unlike traditionally-understood peasants, they are uprooted, identity-incoherent, and artificially sustained.

        Donald Trump is merchant-elite. The AltRight is the intellectual elite and perhaps the most sophisticated propagandists in history. A coup has already happened. Now it’s a power struggle between an entrenched and an ascendant elite. The former exhibits signs of mental illness and the latter is strengthened by the free flow of information.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Selective reading of history, German King George never spoke English and he lost and died a blind and crazy old fool. You went back and brushed up on your responses to me from last time and overlooked all that? You must be on the bottom half of that 115 IQ average. BTW, what muscle do you plan on using? You keep avoiding that question.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “unlike traditionally-understood peasants, they are uprooted, identity-incoherent, and artificially sustained.”

        exactly. peasant uprising. lol. what incentive would they have for laying their lives on the line when it’s not their blood in the soil? they are the most watered down sort of colonists.

        now, the large, poz-infected, white diaspora consisting of TheCunt-voting fags, dykes, numales, spinsters and feminists? now that’s a guerilla force to be reckoned with. i expect to see them rolling down the mall in tanks and storming Congress armed with tactical dildos and butt plugs any day now.

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “ascendant elite”

        there has never in history been a better-armed, and more well-informed ascendancy.

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I have nightmares of being chased by giant purple seguaros with those twirling things

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        the latest armor piercing incendiary dildos can devastate an entire battalion in minutes:

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Oh my God! That’s was their leader!

        Like

      • King George III says:

        “BTW, what muscle do you plan on using? You keep avoiding that question.”

        Wow, you truly have no idea who you’re talking to.

        You.

        If you ever get up your fat, lazy, tattooed Republicuck ass.

        Until then, I’ll just mock you for your mouthbreathing stupidity and delusions of popular revolt.

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      OK. Find out the hard way.

      Like

  68. plumpjack says:

    “Almost one month after it was disclosed that former President Obama’s National Security Adviser Susan Rice was unmasking members of President Trump’s team and other Americans, Trump’s own national security adviser, H.R. McMaster, sent an official letter giving her unfettered and continuing access to classified information and waiving her “need-to-know” requirement on anything she viewed or received during her tenure, Circa has confirmed.”

    https://www.dailystormer.com/scandal-neocon-psychopath-mcmaster-gave-national-security-clearance-to-susan-rice-wat-traitor/

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      interesting physiognomy on this guy:

      Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      H.R. McMaster, sent an official letter giving her unfettered and continuing access to classified information and waiving her “need-to-know” requirement on anything she viewed or received during her tenure, Circa has confirmed.””””””””

      well that’s not actually true according letter from him that is posted at the link
      so
      he said

      ”””””””I hereby waive the requirement that you must have a “need-to-know” to access any classified information contained in items you “originated, reviewed, signed, or reviewed while serving” as national security advisor.””””

      WHILE SERVING IS the big part of that it makes all the diference
      so not on need to know for current items

      Like

    • gunslingergregi says:

      “Almost one month after it was disclosed that former President Obama’s National Security Adviser Susan Rice was unmasking members of President Trump’s team and other Americans,””””””

      where is the link on that

      Like

  69. gunslingergregi says:

    or maybe her paper was shit lol

    Like

  70. gunslingergregi says:

    Mustafa Javed Ali or that dude didn’t want chick presenting it because sexism
    so many scenerios

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Gunslinger, I think PJ has the right approach – glance at the phsyiognomy and then trust your INSTINCTUAL gut reaction to it.

      My gut reaction is that (((Sheldon Adelson))) [and/or (((Steve Wynn))) and/or (((the Pritzkers)))] was funnelling him all the best underaged Brazilian Cabana Boyzzzezes through a D.C. intermediary like Comet Ping Pong Pizza.

      Like

      • The Philosopher says:

        AESTHETICS DONT LIE.

        Ive been saying that for years.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        well break out the lie detector tests

        Like

      • The Philosopher says:

        And the philosophical implication is that aestetics is the only basis in morality.

        What looks evila nd debauched is caused by evil.

        You see yourselves most brainwashed liberals look deformed or ‘weird’. Its not a coincidence.

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        You’re describing Biological Calvinism – our hindbrains evolved to sense outer physical beauty [or hideousness] as a strong predictor of inner spiritual beauty [or hideousness].

        Like

      • Corporal Hicks says:

        Tips for white guys:

        1. Lift.
        2. Stop eating toxic nuclear waste.
        3. Eat less (you should “go hungry” most of the time). Raises T significantly. That being said, avoid low-carb diets, which lower T.
        4. Spend more time outside. The digital invasion and Iphag addiction are killing T.
        5. More time on the motorcycle, which = survival training. Also helps with #4.
        6. Don’t be a Beta straight-fag and worry too much about the world’s problems. You and your white buddies are the solution.
        7. Don’t drink tap water – full of estrogen.
        8. Don’t take pharma meds – will sterilize you and give you man-boobs. NOT kidding.
        9. Avoid vaccines. ALL of them. Eskimo depopulation plan. Makes your kids autistic or aspy. Gives the elderly Alzheimers.
        10. Ditch all the old rules. The race war is all but undeclared at this point.

        Wake up whitey

        Liked by 1 person

      • Revenge of the Scyth says:

        ^Lifting isn’t enough.

        Learn how to scrap.

        Also – throw speed work into your lifting routine.

        Like

      • Revenge of the Scyth says:

        vagina dominator posted some pretty good fight tip vids.

        Like

      • Lichthof says:

        Watch ‘Hi#tler’s Children” and see how they were brought up.
        Hunting, fishing, machinery and encouraged to fight even amongst themselves. Encouraged to become father’s as young a 16.
        Fearless.
        Even the 12 year olds became the parents at home. They were that strong.
        Strength: physical..mental and your soul.

        The enemy and women will look for chinks in or armor.

        A warrior society carrying on our fine tradition (read Who We Are by William Pierce and watch ‘300’)

        Like

      • Lichthof says:

        #3 is good. Germans fought in the East on rye bread and coffee.

        What we eat today in volume is a disgrace and you are encouraged to eat and be indulgent to boost the food industry. The greatest sales myth is getting young women to “eat six small meals a day” to “speed up your metabolism and lose weight” as your food bills go through the roof.
        So much and probably the main part of the liberal urban lifestyle is eating out and diversity (in food… not people – heck no we live in our white over priced safe spaces)
        90% of restaurant food is crap. Laced with bad fats, sugar, salt cooked by fat third worlders. The meat in these places is not genuine meat.
        I know a HB 8.5 Moldovan girl and 8.5 American white girl.
        Diet, small portions etc is the Moldovan’s girl #1 hobby/passion/ reason in life.
        She knows if she gains any weight her power will go down.
        She eats small portions and really healthy foods – grilled chicken salads etc.
        The American girl has been told to ‘you go girl’ an she eas whatever she wants- usually burger and fries. A once nice figure and expanded out and she is not getting it back. Very sad.

        I also find that when women are getting alpha cock they stay in great shape and their anxiety is low. Most other women use bad food to stress eat.

        Liked by 1 person

      • ML says:

        The breakdown will cause a third testicle to sprout in all but the truly hopeless

        Like

      • Revenge of the Scyth says:

        Phil is my favorite live performer.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        the ugly will be good cause they have to be

        Like

      • ML says:

        With guitar – Kurt
        Without guitar – Phil

        But Phil was incredible. Check out the version of Fucking Hostile recorded in Hollywood, ’92.

        To have been a few years older back then, man.

        Like

      • ML says:

        Hate the pot aesthetic, but great song, and that album is a masterpiece. I played it at this kitchen I worked in, even the lesbo waitresses were hooked by that solo in “Stone The Crow”.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        u know the ugly been through some shit
        they can take that to become stronger or weaker

        Like

      • Vagina domina says:

        “vagina dominator posted some pretty good fight tip vids.”

        @ revenge of the scyth

        I am currently working on a new video, an introduction to basic concepts of self defense fighting, guards/coverage, and how to hit at very close quarters.

        If you wished to create a self defense curriculum however – one that required no more than 2 hours a week for one year, i.e., 100 hours – in my opinion it would need to cover the following.

        1.Understanding the roles of preemption, reaction and counterattack in self defense. How to safely close to Very Close Quarters (VCQ) from various distances and positions, especially disadvantageous positions. VCQ means the distances at which we are almost body-on-body and/or our front foot has passed the front foot of the opponent.

        2. Fighting at VCQ: strategy, tactics, techniques, coordinations, and especially footwork and hipwork. Turning the body above and below the waist both independently and together to produce power and evasive movement. How to hit with all surfaces of the hand or fist, and the forearm and elbow. Hitting and moving forehand and backhand, clockwise and counterclockwise.

        3. Preventing opponents capturing our head or waist.

        4. Tripping and throwing and unbalancing the opponent in ways that make the opponent fall – preferably heavily – but do not involve us in in going to ground.

        5. Strategies, tactics and behaviors in situations of multi-person violence – brawls, riots, two-on-ones.

        And that is it. The basics. But it is plenty. Add stuff like particular techniques and responses to techniques that you think are important and need to be drilled.

        Like

      • Vagina domina says:

        On “learning to scrap”

        I can’t get my longer post on this through so I’ll just say one thing:

        Be realistic about your reaction times. You *cannot* get your hands up “in time”. An opponent can cross two meters and hit you in the head before your hands can even twitch. Know that. It is the most important thing to know.

        In fighting, Actor beats Reactor. Always. So always be moving. Never pause or hesitate.

        Boxing guards cannot protect your head. They are not designed to. (I won’t go into it now).

        Learn to fight from a cover guard. Be aggressive.

        I will discuss all of this further in a later video. Couple of months away.

        Like

      • Big-Al says:

        @Lichtof

        Urban lifestyle of eating out all the time is a huge drag on health and finances. Such a waste.

        My wife and I eat at home very well on 50 bucks a week between the two of us…that can be only one or two meals dining out!

        Like

  71. mendo says:

    Wild

    Like

  72. Mr. Roboto says:

    Hi Heartiste,

    I have another interesting finding, social science formally recognizes the Alpha Fucks/Beta Bucks strategy of Women, it is now called “the Madame Bovary Strategy” in referece to the character of Madame Bovary who married a loyal Beta while fucking young Alpha chad on the side. This is problably the very first published reference to the AF/BB in academic literature. Da GBFM was damn rigth!!!

    Book: A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women, 2nd edition
    Autor: Anne Campbell
    Oxford University Press
    Chapter 6 p. 188

    “Men with masculine facial features are rated by women as high in strength and dominance but they are also rated as lower on warmth, emotionality, honesty, and cooperativeness (Perrett et al., 1998). Most significantly, they are rated as less likely to be good parents. It seems that too much dominance may make a man attractive as a short-term mate but raises the specter that his very good looks may make him an unreliable long-term partner.

    An intriguing spate of recent studies has found that women are attracted to these dominant male faces only at a certain point in their menstrual cycle—the follicular phase when they are most fertile (Thornhill & Gangestad, 2008). Why should this be? Some studies find that this cycle effect is exaggerated when women are specifically asked about short-term mating or when they are in a steady relationship. This suggests that women specifically seek good genes rather than good fathers at this time. In short, women find these masculine men attractive as lovers but correctly, if unconsciously, recognize that they are unlikely to stay around. Women already in long-term relationships may be employing a deceptive reproductive tactic colloquially known as the Madame Bovary strategy: find a reliable providing man, then furtively seek a better genetic partner on the side and deceive the male provider into raising it as their own.”

    Like

  73. cortesar says:

    20 + years ago

    Liked by 1 person

  74. Carlos Danger says:

    http://vho.org/aaargh/fran/livres10/WALENDYsolje.pdf

    Link to long Barnes review article on Russia and the Jews by Solzhenitsyn. Very detailed about 70 pages. Good primer on what happened there so it doesn’t happen to us,

    Like

    • oink says:

      What do U know about what happened “there,” cathcuck?!?

      “some” Catholic!

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        Sorry if you’re embarrassed by your ethnic proclivities to violence and deceit. You should be. I supported Serbia once I saw what went on. But in the end it was just another ZOG destabilization operation using the US for muscle. So get off your high horse now that you’re smoked out. You hebes have the most blood on your hands of anyone and it will all be paid back in spades. Satan has lied to you, no matter how rich he makes Papa Rothschild.

        Like

    • Carlos Danger says:

      You’re a lame ass troll. What’s the matter? Too close to home?

      Like

      • oink says:

        “Too close to home”

        But yes cretin; shouldn’t it be so.

        Shouldn’t I know the repeated assrapings done by the US of POZ with the help of idiot cucks like you? Iirc, You personally assisted in the destruction of Pravoslavnic Serbia for a fistful of fiat shekels.

        The untermensch know

        You, not so much

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        I was there so kiss my ass.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      A solid two links about one of the giants of our time… first order of business in a White homeland for some fine arts types would be a full translation of 200 Years Together

      Like

  75. Heinrich says:

    “Must armed citizens enforce the law and end the tyranny of their elected representatives?”

    http://non-intervention.com/

    Like

  76. Heinrich says:

    “There also is a pending, 1st Amendment-killing, bipartisan bill in Congress that bans Americans from economically boycotting Israel or even advocating that action. If it becomes law, it will penalize those who ignore the law’s elimination of free speech with a “minimum civil penalty of $250,000 and a maximum criminal penalty of $1 million and 20 years in prison”

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/senate-bill/720
    http://gothamist.com/2017/07/19/schumer_gillibrand_co-sponsor_senat.php

    Like

  77. Mieszko I says:

    Gentlemen: The future is almost here. I present …………………..

    http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/634713/sex-robots-on-sale-sergi-santos-orgasm-video-synthea-amatus

    Like

  78. Libertardian says:

    Kristol increasingly divorced from reality, seems to be headed for a Hugo Schwyzer (sp? who cares) meltdown

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/05/top-mcmaster-ally-bill-kristol-plotting-primary-oust-trump-must-take-one-shot-removing-potus/

    Like

    • The Philosopher Redux says:

      Kristol is the fucking pits. If he was in an arab country saying ‘we need to replace all arabs’, he would have been executed. Only because whites are high empathy is he able to say that in public. Hes a complete cretin. I would attack him if I saw him.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Lichthof says:

      Kristol is scum. Thus war monger would not last ten minutes in a trench. Happy to send army kids off to die while his own 3 kids cosy up in their private schools

      Like

      • oink says:

        Sending the troops to battle is not within the purview of middle management

        But u knew that

        Lick my Habsburg popish anus, you God Damned BND plant!

        Liked by 1 person

  79. gunslingergregi says:

    just watched school for scoundrels
    about game class
    it was hilarious
    even talked about the lion

    Liked by 1 person

  80. cortesar says:

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      A very poignant movie about White character and nobility, and the changing of that guard, as it were.

      The look on Abrams face as Liddel runs the 200M is worth the price of admission. He knows, in his heart, that he wasn’t the better man.

      Like

      • mendo says:

        I just saw it recently. Enjoyed it more than I thought I would.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        To this day I wonder if it were just happenstance or behind-the-scenes machinations that they scheduled the 100M (qualifer or main race, I forget) on a Sunday to purposefully upend Liddel because they knew he could beat Abrahms and that he wouldn’t run on Sunday due to religious conviction, thereby making Abrahm’s chances at gold (and Jew pride) all the better.

        Like

  81. Alexander says:

    https://qz.com/499618/the-us-marines-tested-all-male-squads-against-mixed-gender-ones-and-the-men-came-out-ahead/

    Studies show that more dominant marines i.e. males outperform females.

    Like

  82. gunslingergregi says:

    dang told 4 chicks in my life I loved them not with any of em
    fuck

    Like

  83. Captain Obvious says:

    REVEALED: Anthony Scaramucci ‘shopped for a $9 million Manhattan co-op apartment with Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle’ before his wife filed for divorce (and he was turned down). http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3574964/posts

    Like

  84. Captain Obvious says:

    Anthony Scaramucci ‘shopped for a $9 million Manhattan co-op apartment with Fox News host Kimberly Guilfoyle’ before his w!fe filed for d!vorce… http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3574964/posts

    Like

  85. Captain Obvious says:

    Da Mooch + Kimberly Guilfoyle == D!VORCE R@PE http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3574964/posts

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        O’Reilly dippin’ it in da ladies. Ailes dippin’ it in da ladies. House N!gger Charles Payne dippin’ it in da mudsharks. Eric Bolling sexting da d!ck pics. Da Mooch dippin’ it in Kimberly Guilfoyle.

        It’s a friggin’ 24×7 0rgy at Fox Newz.

        Like

  86. Little League removes softball team from World Series over social media post http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3574979/posts

    Like

  87. Sir Poundsalot says:

    Off Topic, Need Advice from the Chateau faithful:

    Her: 24, decent face but beautiful, thin hourglass body. Fun and pleasant personality, always smiling.

    Me: Late 20’s, modestly good-looking, in shape, usually tight game.

    Month into fling, two bj’s so far. Went to bang her after night of drinking and very short on sleep two separate times, had trouble being hard enough. This rattled me since it’s never happened before. She turns me on plenty, that’s not an issue. Usually pretty horny dude lol. But now I’m putting pressure on things and developing a mental block about it. I don’t think it’ll happen again but it’s screwing with my head. She’s made it clear she’s still mine for the taking, but I’m a little anxious now.

    Should I try taking zinc or vitamin D supplements? Take some libido supplement from Wgreens? Just get more sleep and try to relax? all of the above?

    [CH: sleep regenerates T and lowers coprtisol (relaxing capillaries). so if you’re short on sleep, fix that problem first. Also, do you lift? try a massive squat session the day before seeing her.]

    Like

    • Sir Poundsalot says:

      Thanks for the advice CH, I’m a big fan.

      I’m into weightlifting, cycling and hiking. I was doing full body workouts 3 days per week and cycling the other days for a couple months. During that time I was horny all the fackin time. I thought it was the cycling but after reading a little it was probably the lifting more. I need to get back to that and sleeping more.

      Like

  88. The Philosopher Redux says:

    Speaking of yellen, the jews have had fed chairs I think since even before they were allowed into academia in the 60s (to fantastic and absolutely great for society results which we I totally wish we could have done earlier)

    http://forward.com/culture/325447/the-man-behind-the-fed/

    The author of this explanation of the feds creation is probably jewish. It makes sense though. I’m actually not as sold on conspiracy of a secret monetary cabal counterfeiting money for power, sex and land. It doesn’t hold up to my other knowledge.

    I’m more inclined to think 9-11 was mossad or the paedo blackmail rings though. But of course the fed is controlled by jews more overtly now with Goldman Sachs emerging in the 90s under their busboy, Bill Clinton.

    Rubin is among the most powerful men in the world.

    Like

  89. Lichthof says:

    This Google anti diversity memo…seems to be annoying alot of people lol

    Like

    • cortesar says:

      Googlers,

      I’m Danielle, Google’s brand new VP of Diversity, Integrity & Governance. I started just a couple of weeks ago, and I had hoped to take another week or so to get the lay of the land before introducing myself to you all. But given the heated debate we’ve seen over the past few days, I feel compelled to say a few words.

      Many of you have read an internal document shared by someone in our engineering organization, expressing views on the natural abilities and characteristics of different genders, as well as whether one can speak freely of these things at Google. And like many of you, I found that it advanced incorrect assumptions about gender. I’m not going to link to it here as it’s not a viewpoint that I or this company endorses, promotes or encourages

      Like

      • cortesar says:

        “expressing views on the natural abilities and characteristics of different genders”
        ——————————————————————————

        I am sure you are wandering what this diversity cunt officer looks like

        https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSKbpSvGCmfg3STWIdAgrT18hSOFPoZMxqWAf6ryhhBxTA2AUAhHw

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        apparently shr had been enforcing diversity for 3 years in Intel previously
        Just another illuminating view

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        as you all know I am writing a book entitled

        Voyage au bout de la nuit or My cunt is a chief diversity officer

        just looking at that profile I have sketched 4 new chapters in a matter of minutes

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        I have so far struggled trying to write an uber alpha male character for my book
        His soul purpose would be attracting cunts to buy the book instead of the new version of 6 speed dildo aka Agony and Ecstasy 6tm
        My head would start spinning thinking of all shekels this transaction could potentially bring me

        Not any more

        Like

      • oink says:

        Nice company you have here, Jews

        Pity should your disrespectful attitude toward POZ-dogmas result in your losing it.

        Signed: Massa Crackie

        The untermensch know

        Like

      • mendo says:

        She looks like a witch. I mean straight up exactly like a witch.

        Also that (((Matt Siegel))) is a candidate for most punchable shitlib face. He oversized glasses look comical.

        All these (((fuckers))) are scared.

        Da Goyim Know and are tired of (((their) shite!

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        If you interview at Google, be prepared to talk about “your experience with diversity”. FOR THE ENTIRE INTERVIEW.#GoogleManifesto pic.twitter.com/EItVd3FCd9

        — Supreme Dark Lord (@voxday) August 7, 2017

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        Like

      • mendo says:

        I think I saw that earlier either on DS or gab. What a load of bull.

        So much for demonstrating you know about algorithms and data structures. Just repeat the SJW manifesto and you’re a shoe-in.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        James Damore we salute you

        In a Time of Universal Deceit — Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act
        George Orwell

        James Damore is the Google engineer who wrote the meritocracy/accept diversity of ideas memo. He’s being strung up. pic.twitter.com/1rVsW3Jddm

        — Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) August 7, 2017

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        google managers

        pay particular attention to the senior individual Colm Buckley

        p.s
        I do not know where CH is but this deserves a separate thread
        It has some ingredients of gamer gate and its potential to further destroy the the holy cathedral of lies

        Like

    • Moses says:

      That brave Google engineer will be swarmed and destroyed by SJWs.

      They do not see the irony of calling for his termination for crimethink while at the same time their official diversity statement reads Google is committed to making “all employees feel safe regardless of gender, ethnicity, political beliefs…”

      I read the memo. The man bends over backwards to say how he’s committed to diversity, but disagrees with the methods. Yet the fake news headlines all read “Anti-Diversity Memo….”

      And the surpreme irony — Google’s and SJW’s reaction to the memo proves the points of the memo.

      There is no reasoning with these people. War is coming.

      Like

  90. Caramba says:

    Im telling you guys-women are crazy and anti civilisational:

    Like

  91. GE, Liddell won the gold in the 400 m, not the 200 m (where he won the bronze). His WR time in the 400 m also stood for 12 years, until it was beaten by another Brit, Godrey Brown, at the Berlin 1936 games.

    Those darn Scots. Can’t keep ’em down. God ran with him that day in Paris, 1924.

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      You’re right, my mistake, it was the 400M.

      Like

    • PA says:

      I ran 400m and 800m in high school. The 400 is the hardest track event – it’s too short to pace yourself (you run a full sprint start to finish) and too long to not notice the anaerobic process.

      Like

      • mendo says:

        I had read somewhere that the 400 is the ultimate test of endurance, strength and stamina for exactly the reasons you mentioned.

        You have to literally be firing on all cylinders for that event.

        Like

  92. Thought you’d appreciate this, Heartiste: “What will Democrats do next time they win the presidency?”

    https://nationalistperspective.wordpress.com/2017/08/06/what-will-democrats-do-next-time-they-win-the-presidency/

    Like

  93. Dude says:

    Science and all that.

    https://evolution-institute.org/article/on-common-criticisms-of-evolutionary-psychology/#_edn45

    My only quarrel with the article is he claims that, “it is a mistake to pit post-modernism and social constructivism against evolutionary psychology as though they are in an intellectual death match that only one side can win.” Actually, they are; one is science, the other is horseshit. No points for figuring out which is which.

    Like

  94. Mean Mr. Mustard says:

    Like

  95. Sorry if this has been mentioned, I have no time to read the 534 comments above

    A male employee from Google ( who may be a CH reader?) has published an ” anti-diversty” 10 page memo in which he says, among other things that women are biologically different than men and that is why they are not as good as men are at certain things.

    Are men finally waking up? Is there hope?

    http://gizmodo.com/exclusive-heres-the-full-10-page-anti-diversity-screed-1797564320?rev=1501965015200&utm_campaign=socialflow_gizmodo_twitter&utm_source=gizmodo_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow

    Like

    • mendo says:

      I’d bet dollars to donuts the man that wrote that is a CH reader. He was making too much sense.

      It’s a good read and hopefully, the man that wrote that is not alone in his sentiment at both google and other tech companies.

      Like

    • oink says:

      no such luck

      we will give it back to the last shekel

      it will not be pretty

      Liked by 1 person

    • oink says:

      nice company you have ((Sergey Mikhaylovitch))

      pity it should suffer due to normie deviationism.

      – Massa

      P.S.
      the untermensch know

      Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        now its the jews know ahh sheottt

        Like

      • Anonymous says:

        no ((they)) don’t.
        .
        even the most bright of ((them)), see Moldbug, will not name the ((Massa))
        .
        anyway, aren’t you supposed to be saving-the-ho that Massa was about to snuff out, (to your impotent, beaten puppy, wailing)?

        Like

    • martin says:

      I mentioned on here once before that the tech industry and the left are almost 1 for 1. the tech industry’s demands are the same as the left’s and the tech businesses have vast power and are given a free pass. Consider Google starting the arab spring and then pressing for immigration to europe in 2015 all whilst evading taxes and the media letting them go over it. If we take down tech powers, we take down the left. an internal rebellion would greatly change things i believe, in the west, if a minority of men in tech rebelled.

      Like

  96. gunslingergregi says:

    bitch in jail out of her commissary already so its like just cause change of conditions she fiending for candy instead of drugs but I guess the fiending part ain’t gonna change.
    what the fuck is life
    kind of a sick joke

    Like

  97. Captain Obvious says:

    Monday, Aug 7, 2017: Rush Limbaugh effectively talking about “The Illuminati” in the first hour today.

    15 years ago, Rush would have been carted off by the men in the white jackets.

    Today, Truth Speak began moving mainstream.

    #DaGoyimKnow

    Like

    • Heinrich says:

      Just right now I finished a clip about the Illuminati. It is worth to listen to the narrator’s voice. The spoken information is correct. There are several versions circulating in the web. The spoken word is the same, but the video information is altered.

      As far as I can judge this version is unaltered:

      Like

      • Heinrich says:

        There is a mental disruption at 29.32,video-time. It is misinformation. Just pay attention to the audio. It is from 1967.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        luciferians believe that the being they worship is the good version of this being and do not believe the being they call Lucifer has any of the negative attributes that the bible describes”””””’

        are you fucking kidding me

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        after watching my dad I been thinking the devil is the good guy not the God dude

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        you got to be tortured on earth but don’t worry its gonna be gravy in the afterlife even though you can’t even comprehend what the fuck great will be cause you never had it

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        guess why god for the plebes to follow and devil for the elite
        slave vs free
        its makes complete sense

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        no wonder shit fucked up most people worship the bad version that is also bad

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        makes sense too hard to get to heavan when people worshipping the evil version of god
        crazy shit
        got to worship the devil who is actually good to go heaven

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        most men lead lives of quiet desperation”””

        jee I wonder why

        Like

  98. Heinrich says:

    Several months ago Carlos said that it is vital for Trump to bypass the (((MSM))). Real News Broadcast with Kayleigh McEnany has been launched.

    https://www.infowars.com/trump-launches-real-news-broadcast-fake-media-goes-nuts/

    Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      Is this going to be on actual TV or just in Cyberia? I looked at a couple of articles but couldn’t find any solid info on what channels are going to carry it.

      Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        My guess is cyberia. I think the basic idea is good. It would be better with Trump documentaries detailing problems and solutions from our perspective to give the normies some comfort. He could have cabinet officials from key agencies give presentations, debates, etc.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Alas, Cyberia tends to be echo chambers preaching to the choir…

        Meanwhile, (((MSM))) broadcasts 24/7 into every home, hotel, and airport… all neener-neenering Cyberian Trump Network as propaganda, go figger.

        Trump will get more mileage from his tweets.

        This isn’t winning… it’s not even a draw. 😦

        Like

      • streetsweeper says:

        Greg “I know a winning strategy when I see one!”, “Where I come from everyone tells only the exact truth!” Eliot says:

        “This isn’t winning… it’s not even a draw. 😦”

        Like

      • Wrong Side of History says:

        lol

        Like

      • Wrong Side of History says:

        I respect the steppe battle tactics of streetsweeper.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Of course you do… you’re the same ilk of sock puppy dweeb, and birdbrains of a feather flock together.

        You, no-bones, saucyqueer, dweebstreep, etc. all sit around in your cubicle circle-jerks, only taking a break to high-five each other on who’s the most douche-chill inducing.

        Like

    • cortesar says:

      “:actual TV”

      What the hell is “actual TV” is that the electric Jew that you are talking about?
      Jesus f*ucking Christ is that baby boomer that speaks from unconscious depths of yours?
      We know that you goys are not particularly versed in techmology
      but still your rejection of “Cyberia” leaves one in the utter sate of disbelief
      In this time and age when every normal thinking being reject these MSM factories of lies you want to establish them as supreme source of the truth?
      What is wrong with you?

      Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        Actual TV is what everyone has in their homes and what gets broadcast 24/7 in every hotel lobby, corporate break room, and airport, if you haven’t noticed.

        It’/s not a rejection of Cyberia to note that the scales of dissemination are still heavily weighted to traditional media.

        Just because WE’RE aware of things like the chateau, breitbart, etc., the majority of people that still need red-pilling are not watching anything beyond Fox News and perhaps a Hannity-type here and there.

        If you think otherwise, you’re more out-of-touch than you imagine your straw man boomers to be.

        Like

      • Greg Eliot says:

        It’s one thing to have the (((usual suspect))) shills and stooges snark from the sidelines…

        … but when our own alleged alt-R allies can’t admit when crumbs aren’t feasts, and call it “winning” when grand juries don’t get convened against anyone but our side, well…

        Not to mention letting the stooge snarkers run wild here without coming more to the fore to help bounce the place.

        Like

      • cortesar says:

        You do not expect (((actual TV))) to propagate our ideas or come anywhere close the truth, do you?
        Cyberia is all that we have and it will remain so for a long time
        The name of the game here is the destruction of (((actual TV))) and not discreditation of Cyberia which your enemy keep doing
        What part of that simple equation you do not understand?

        Like

      • streetsweeper says:

        Greg “cyberia is an echo chamber! I get my news the old-fashioned way: from the TEEVEE!” Eliot says:

        “Actual TV is what everyone has in their homes and what gets broadcast 24/7 in every hotel lobby, corporate break room, and airport, if you haven’t noticed.”

        sure, Greg. here’s your average family at home in 2017:

        Like

  99. gunslingergregi says:

    Like

  100. Random Guy says:

    Here’s another study for you:

    Middle Aged Fathers children are more socially capable in the long run than the children with Younger Fathers.

    https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/fathers-age-effects-kids-social-skills/

    Like

    • Random Guy says:

      What’s interesting about it is they took into factors like social and environment and it appears to be purely genetic.

      Like

Leave a Reply