Feed on
Posts
Comments

Recently, the Audacious Epigone highlighted a poll which found that, among women age 18-29 (the single White woman years), the most common preferred term of self-identification is “feminist”.

I was reminded of that poll and the data showing single White women voted overwhelmingly for thecunt (and for Gay Mulatto), single women are more xenophilic than are men,  and single White women are for open borders trash world globohomoism, when I watched this Jordan Peterson video and read the following excellent commentary from a CH reader. Note that I have already commented on the same Peterson speech, but the reader who forwarded the video, including his commentary, fleshed out my thoughts more exhaustively.

******

This series is amazingly good. Very long lectures, but saturated with good ideas.

This third lecture is the most recent one I have listened, and they just keep getting better.

You must listen carefully to 2:33:00 to the end, last question at the end of the lecture, about 8 minutes.

Peterson says that the SJW “equality-above-all-else philosophy” is predicated on personality factors associated with women, “agreeableness and high negative emotion” but even controlling for those, SJWs are more likely to be female. He then tries to explain this.

The relative evolutionary roles of women versus men, is men produce and women distribute, and insist on fairness. This was shaped the evolutionary background of human beings.

He talks about the role of women political power, which has never happened before, He notes correctly how their demand for equality runs up against the reality of differential productivity.

The SJW phenomenon is associated with the rise of women to political power. “We don’t know what a truly female political philosophy would be like.” He then correctly notes simply saying everyone gets the same thing, which is not a sophisticated philosophy. He evades saying this is all the “philosophy” they ever will generates. But there is no reason to think it will ever be anything else.

Peterson then quotes someone — he can’t remember who — and a Google search does not turn it up: “Men test ideas and women test men.”

“We don’t know to what extent women test men sheerly by provocation. It’s a lot.” “I’m going to go after you and see where your weak spots are.” Bingo. He recognizes the that women shit test men. He then says that in this movement, and using shame, “there is a tremendous amount of provocation.” He is recognizing that PC, SJW behavior is a shit test.

As I have noted before, feminism, from the beginning was civilizational-scale shit test that women, at some level, wanted men to overcome. They wanted a firm hand, and instead they got: “Whatever will make you happy, honey” The men of our civilization failed this colossal shit test. And that was when our civilization started to fall apart.

This is amazing enough. But it gets better.

Back to Peterson.

He next says “I shouldn’t say this.” Then he says: “I don’t believe this but I am trying to figure it out.” Ha, right! As a Freudian psychoanalyst, Peterson himself would know this is a major tell. He knows it is risky to say it, he decides to say it, but then he tries to introduce some not-very-plausible deniability. He talks about 50 Shades of Gray and says it is “comical” that at the very moment of strident demands for equality this bestseller shows that the subconscious female mind desires for dominance.

Calling this “comical” is a way of downplaying its significance. It is not comical. Another Freudian tell. It is rudimentary that people claim to be joking when they are saying what they really think but are afraid to admit it. The gigantic fact of the bestsellerdom of 50 Shades is not funny. It is evidence. It is damning, irrefutable evidence of what women really want versus what they say they want. Peterson does not use the phrase “revealed versus disclosed preferences.” But that is exactly what it is.

He then says that something else he is trying to puzzle out, and he agains says “it’s not like I believe this” — again implausibly. He refers to the “crazy alliance” between the Feminists and the Radical Islamists “that I just do not get.” But he does get it. He pretends to take Feminism at face value, that it is about the rights of women, the safety of women, the wellbeing of women, which it has never been. He says “Why they aren’t protesting non-stop about Saudi Arabia is completely beyond me.” But, it is not beyond him, as his next comments prove. He then says, agains distancing himself “this may be the Freudian in me.” He then tells the truth couched as a question: “Is there an attraction that is there attraction that is emerging among the female radicals for that totalitarian male dominance that they’ve chased out of the West.” Again the distancing: “I mean, that’s a Hell of a thing to think.” It is even more of a Hell of a thing to live with as your country and your civilization is committing suicide because your females are so desperate for an unapologetic dicking that they are desperate to import the Muslim bitch-hand. Peterson then says he can see “no rational reason” for the alliance between radical females and Islam. Correct. There is an irrational reason. Or is it actually rational for a woman to want what evolution drives her to want. He

He raises and rejects the simple notion that the female radicals are attracted by radical Islam primarily because it is the enemy of the west.

Peterson then restates his main point more strongly. “I’m not going to shake my suspicion about this unconscious balancing. Because the demand for egalitarianism and the eradication of masculinity accelerates there is going to be a longing in the unconscious for the opposite of that, the more you scream for equality the more your unconscious is going to admire dominance.” Pause, as if he realizes he has gone very far. Then in an aw-shucks tone: “Well, that’s how you think if you are psycho-analytically minded.” Which has already repeatedly said he is. So in the end he admits, by logical indirection, but nonetheless clearly, that this is what he thinks.

This is an amazing performance. You can see struggling to puke out the truth, against his will and better judgment. But he does manage at last to puke it out. Dr. Peterson is courageous man. But even he does not want to say some things out loud, and at least initially hedges when he does so. But he is a realist and a truth-teller first. But getting there is not easy. We can see him clawing his way toward the truth, and speaking the truth. We can see that struggle in real time in this video.

Peterson is a mighty slayer of pretty lies. He is nothing less than a hero for what he is doing, and saying out loud.

******

Single White women don’t want to be appeased.

They don’t want to be indulged.

They don’t want to be catered to, coddled, or placated.

They don’t want their tears dried or their complaints addressed.

They don’t want men to listen to their words.

They want men to watch what they do and respond with the requisite dignified and dominant masculinity.

They want to submit to a man, and to a society, worthy of their submission.

Now of course single White women will never tell you this, or admit these 100% truefact desires to even themselves…but they feel these urges, and their hindbrains demand this from them and from the men they shit test.

Single White women individually shit test men and collectively shit test men through the male achievement of civilized society. Our shared single White woman problem is a civilization-scale shit test, and as the reader wrote, the men of the West have been, and continue, spectacularly failing this single White women shit test.

Modren Western man fails this shit test so badly that he is fairly likened to the incel beta orbiter who is always on call to provide a shoulder to cry on while his oneitis fucks dirt world ingrates who beat her silly and crap in his yard.

That is how badly, how powerfully, single White women yearn for the pimp hand. Their yearning for the ministrations of dominant men beckons them to sacrifice their homelands for the thrill of the tingle. A tingle which has been lost to them as their men have grown soft and weak under the yoke of decadence and decades of weaponized anti-White male propaganda.

It’s time the White men of the West learned Game and brought their women to heel. The alternative is civilizational death.

Game can save nations.

126 Responses to “Single White Women Are A Civilization-Scale Shit Test”

  1. Ripp says:

    The abundance of white, single, childless, post wall Gen X women is sad.

    Good for cats and small dog rescues though…

    Liked by 2 people

    • mendo says:

      No kidding. I was just thinking about that the other day.

      Like

    • So aggravating when a girl (or in many cases these days, a guy) says “here let me show you our family!” But when they hold up the pic, it’s just them… their spouse, and a pet or two.

      You don’t have a family without kids, nice try though.

      Liked by 3 people

      • wolfie65 says:

        Well, you do.
        Pets are as much part of the family as flesh-and-blood human kin.
        And a planet of cats and dogs would be a damn sight better than the stinking sh1t pile we have now.
        However – White people are THE ONLY ONES WHO THINK THIS WAY.
        And if they’re the ones not having (human) ch1ldr3n, the fate of non-humans in a world dominated by F_ckslam, the Middle F-ck and F_ckfrica is going to be halal kebab or torture and s12v3ry.
        Until some Aliens finally arrive, decide that this little rock isn’t worth their time and blast it to smithereens from space.

        Liked by 1 person

      • vfm#7634 says:

        “Sorry sugart!ts, but “fur-babies” are NOT HU-WHYTE BABEEZ.”

        Liked by 2 people

      • elmertjones says:

        Where my wife comes from they eat dogs.

        Like

      • bolg says:

        elmert, not something to brag about though

        Like

      • bolg says:

        “… However – White people are THE ONLY ONES WHO THINK THIS WAY….”

        wolfie, White people think that way about niggers, what’s the surprise?

        no offence to dogs, btw

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “no offence to dogs, btw”

        LOL’ed.

        Like

    • Considering most rescues are likely the result of women getting a pet for the feels then not wanting the responsibility of taking care of it later, or also of the feels of not neutering (neutering a dog so barbaric! Islamic fgm so empowering!), it’s a nicely closed circle.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        yeah, and girls who are obsessed with animals are not usually good mothers anyway.

        i know some here would say that they would be good mothers if they had children instead of pets but i’ve met too many women who prove that to be wrong.

        whether it’s cats, dogs, horses, etc. there are a lot of women who have kids and a man but still focus too much attention on animals.

        too much focus on pets, animal rights causes, volunteering at the humane society, being vegan or vegetarian etc. all signs that they are better at relating to animals and probably care more about them than humans. that’s not wifey/mother material in my book. anyone who puts animals or other races/cultures before their own kind is bad news.

        Like

      • too much focus on pets, animal rights causes, volunteering at the humane society, being vegan or vegetarian etc. all signs that they are better at relating to animals and probably care more about them than humans.

        My ex was a vegetarian veterinarian and she paid more attention to her damn dogs than me. Ultimately, I broke up with her over it.

        https://therationalmale.com/2012/04/07/that-damn-dog/

        Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        there are a lot of them like that now

        even if they claim they love you and the kids more than the pets, they don’t act like it. they treat the animals as equals or even better than humans most of the time

        letting the animals in the bed with them, sharing their food and letting them lick all over their faces. snuggling with them all the time.

        they are giving attention to animals that should be reserved for the humans in their life. something very wrong and unhealthy about that

        Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        a lot of women are raising their daughters to be the same way too. sad

        Like

      • plumpjack says:

        “a lot of women are raising their daughters to be the same way too. sad”

        yes. and this is where the spike in sexual “trauma” among our own kind comes from. permissive single moms who enable, passively or intentionally, degenerate behavior by their daughters, and/or allow them to be exposed to feral males in a way where the odds of NOT being molested at a young age are low.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bolg says:

        “…letting the animals in the bed with them, sharing their food and letting them lick all over their faces. snuggling with them all the time….”

        then they push it in your face. “fido can lick his own balls for me and you won’t even to do the dishes????”

        Liked by 1 person

      • Cracker says:

        yep
        they love all the attention and unconditional they get from animals with no requirement that they do anything to earn it.

        they can be as fat mannish slobby selfish or bitchy as they want and fido will still love them.

        then they resent all the people in their lives for not wanting to kiss their defective asses and treat them like queens. messed up

        Liked by 2 people

      • Doktor Jeep says:

        I have been with the “kind of women” who rescue pets.
        Stay the fuck away from them if you know what’s good for you. Mark my words.
        *fades back into the shadows…

        Liked by 1 person

      • Oleaginous Outrager says:

        “yeah, and girls who are obsessed with animals are not usually good mothers anyway.”

        It’s a small sample, but one now 40+ woman I know always posts pictures of her cats, who she speaks of like they’re people, and rarely mentions her son, who has never lived with her and who she handed of to her parents shortly after birth “because she could handle the responsibility so young” (really she just wanted to move to LA and live her care-free single life).

        Of course, not matter how much these fools may pamper their “furbabies”. most animals take care of themselves, so it’s not even close to the same thing.

        Liked by 1 person

      • bolg says:

        “….unconditional they get from animals with no requirement that they do anything to earn it.

        they can be as fat mannish slobby selfish or bitchy as they want and fido will still love them…”

        that’s the definition of how an animal (or a child) loves mommy. unconditionally. there is a reason for anymal lovery and single mommery and it’s the same one – with an animal she gets the good feelz and it’s out of the way pretty soon (different lifespan). with a child at 45 she gets the good feelz and she won’t have to see the trainwreck (different lifespans).

        Like

      • bolg says:

        mod helvette. zis is unnice.

        Like

    • Doktor Jeep says:

      And as a GenX’er who foolishly followed what the boomers told me (do everything “right” and everything right will come by you) it’s fun watching all these women my age who would not give me the time of day 25 years ago end up exactly like we predicted they will end up.

      Like

  2. It’s happening. Slowly at first, but gathering momentum. Follow the King Chad’s lead!

    Like

  3. Ironsides says:

    Powerful stuff, and all quite true.

    Like

  4. […] Single White Women Are A Civilization-Scale Shit Test […]

    Like

  5. jamzw says:

    Peterson is a gift that keeps on giving. His three hours with Joe Rogan blew Rogan out of the water onto dry land, and he couldn’t thank Peterson enough.

    Liked by 2 people

  6. Damn Crackers says:

    Biggest shit test since Theodora said she’d only wear purple at the Nika riots.

    Like

  7. CalvinDecline says:

    Watch more Jordan Petersen if you aren’t already.

    He brilliantly and articulately gives thorough refutations to all this SJW horse sh!t. Arm yourselves men.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. stanislav says:

    Women are the sole cause of man’s misery, all this nationalism is meaningless if not for men here appeasing white women’s pussy . We should embrace artificial wombs and sex dolls instead of women, culling of every women is needed or relegating them to domestic farming. Bring back female Sex slavery and chattel house brothels

    [CH: reductio ad absurdum troll level 99]

    Like

  9. honeycomb says:

    Other than a collapse of our First World USofA .. you will not bring Th Wimminz of Uhmerica to heel.

    Not. Going. To. Happen.

    ..
    ..

    And, how do I know .. because we have to many weak men.

    Like

  10. wolfie65 says:

    There’s nothing mysterious about the alliance between feminists and Afroasia.
    Afroasia have seen the White Man as their arch enemy no. 1 since time immemorial – thousands of years, maybe it even goes back beyond ice ages, to the Neanderthals, Homo Sapiens, etc.
    Feminists have been (((instructed))) to see the White Man as their no. 1 arch enemy also, but only for the past 100 years or so.
    Similar applies to Greens, environmentalists, animal rights activists, children’s rights activists, gay rights activists, and a whole bunch of other -ists.
    All of them should recognize Afroasia as their eternal arch enemy no.1, but they don’t, transferring their undy1ng H@tr3d onto White Men instead.
    Because (((propaganda)))

    Like

    • plumpjack says:

      “Feminists have been (((instructed))) to see the White Man as their no. 1 arch enemy also, but only for the past 100 years or so.”

      women’s sexual liberation is what turned white men and women against each other. cheaters, sluts, and selfish women used to be ostracized and were often found stone cold in a ditch.. now they’re “celebrated”, and white men can legally only hate them for being so vile.

      feeling the judgement, women shrink from the white man’s disapproval. they want us to love them more than anything in the world, but we can’t, because they’re vile traitors to their people, sharing their precious wombs indiscriminately and for no good reason than immediate gratification.

      yet we don’t mind using them for scratching posts. being used them discarded is what fills them with hatred, but it was their behavior that started it. so we end up hating each other, and the cycle won’t be broken until we have a generation of women come up who aren’t whores.

      Liked by 1 person

  11. plumpjack says:

    I’m thinking the immediate future of civilization is going to involve more pimp hand than game. at least until we raise a new generation of women who’s hamsters haven’t already been rotted from the inside out by the poz.

    and any beta male enablers are going to be feeling the sting of the pimp hand also. again, at least until Generation Zyklon is fully in power.

    Like

  12. Native Balkaner says:

    Isn’t feminism more of a Beta Bait than a Shit Test ? Like “Honey please give me the right to vote. You will be such a good boy if you do that , and I will love you sooo much” Western male fails the Beta Bait , gets qualified as beta.

    [CH: it’s a fine line separating beta bait from shit test, but technically yeah you could reasonably argue that feminism is more like beta bait. i see it as encompassing both female forms of sexual market mate selection algorithms, given that feminism is as caustic and provocative as it is cajoling and whiny.]

    Like

    • Native Balkaner says:

      [CH: it’s a fine line separating beta bait from shit test, but technically yeah you could reasonably argue that feminism is more like beta bait. i see it as encompassing both female forms of sexual market mate selection algorithms, given that feminism is as caustic and provocative as it is cajoling and whiny.]
      I really like it how seriously you take the technicalities CH. Truly professional. Keep up with the good work.

      [CH: i run a tight ship here.]

      Like

  13. Passer by says:

    For more on this topic check this out:

    “The problem with Feminism. Why Feminisation leads to Third-Worldization.”

    http://diversitymachtfrei.blogspot.bg/2016/05/the-problem-with-feminism-why.html

    an article explaining how, and why feminism destroys itself and any feminised country.

    Like

  14. SW says:

    So to translate: given their voting proclivities and power, under every (future) burkha shall be found a sated whyte feminist happily getting slapped around…

    Who would have thought that 50 shades was an instruction manual? CH probably.

    The West is waking up however. Trump is only the forerunner of what comes next. Dark times are coming for sure but there’s hope at the end, if men of the West learn to stop fearing their women.

    BTW, long time reader, first time commenter.

    Like

  15. Passer by says:

    Also some additional stuff for CH

    College Women Are More Politically Liberal Than Ever, Research Finds

    https://www.glamour.com/story/college-women-more-politically-liberal-2017-research-finds

    Like

  16. Wilson says:

    I don’t know if men really failed, feminists (Communist/Jews) popped up around the Civil War, WWI, and the Vietnam War, and got laws pushed through while men were laid up or laid underground. The whole appeal of progressivism is that infection and decay tends to spread quickly and irreversibly so MAGA has always been a monumental task

    Like

    • Major7 says:

      Women in 1920: “Thanks for giving us the vote, fellas, now you can’t drink!”

      What a great start, girls. Prohibition was so monumentally stupid, that is was actually repealed by the Federal Government. They don’t repeal anything, ever. But they repealed that turd. Should have repealed the vote, while they were at it, but FDR was a Democrat.

      Like

  17. martin says:

    would really help if we got rid of the harassment laws first. btw, I have noticed that non westerners were exempted from harassment laws.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Increasingly, courts everywhere are finding the R@pefugees to be innocent of R@pe, simply because the courts find that R@pefugees gonna R@pe, so it wouldn’t be fair to hold them to the same standards as human males [i.e. White Men].

      Like

    • bolg says:

      the “cultural idiosyncrasy” defense applies only to muds

      Like

  18. john smith says:

    CH once again is spot on. But, here is the problem explained by Sandman in today’s (7/18/17) video. At 5:10 he explains everything about MGTOW and gynocentrism is one sentence.

    “But society makes it so that men can’t stand up to women in ways we once did without going to jail.”

    I’ve had a woman throw me in jail, as have millions of other men.

    The bind is that men are damned if they do and damned if they don’t. Yes, it is a gigantic shit that cannot be passed on even a medium term basis. If you put her in her place she will love you for it until she no longer loves you for it and then has you jailed while she monkey branches.

    To save our civilization men must put women in their place, but by doing so an individual man will be jailed and bankrupted. We can’t save civilization from the inside of a jail cell.

    What the hell are we supposed to do? Heads, civilization crumbles, tails, you go to jail.

    To quote Julius Caesar, “The die is cast”. Putting the genie of innate female sexuality unleashed (Spengler and Unwin) back in the bottle isn’t going to happen. No amount of “game” will keep you out of jail if that is where she wants you.

    My plan is this: I’m a millionaire. I’m going to buy between 50 and 200 acres in a remote yet arable location with structures. The land can be sub-divided so single family homes can be built. Everything will be owned by a trust that specifically excludes females from being beneficiaries (a trust cannot discriminate by race, ethnicity, etc., but it can discriminate by gender, at least in my state anyway).

    The trust will pass down through male direct (meaning DNA) descendant beneficiaries. The trust even goes so far as to define “male”. It makes allowances for a wife “NAWALT” if a male beneficiary dies. If she divorces him, the trust will have her thrown off the dirt. She can’t use the false DV charge to steal the house.

    Bottom line: Put everything you own in what is known as a Revocable Trust for your benefit while you are alive. The trust is a legal third party that she cannot get her hands on. The trust becomes IRREVOCABLE upon your death.

    I will go there, make a drink, kick back, and enjoy the show. My male family members will always have a place to go when it comes their turn to be shit on by society.

    MGTOW from here on out. It is the only sane decision.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Captain Obvious says:

      Like

    • That’s why ya don’t get mad and hit a bitch you get their permission and they will always give permission pretty much so two consenting adults. Of course take it to extreme and get their permission to kill them whenever you feel justified so if you ever have to go before God you cool.

      Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        And there, gentlemen, you have it in a nutshell.

        We can all go home now.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        it can get a little freaky when they know they a whore and cant stop and want to stop and start really asking u to off em cause they don’t want to live like that but don’t know another way

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        “they don’t want to live like that but don’t know another way”

        Then man up and put them in THE OTHER WAY. The Family Way.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        suggest belt on ass though these two broke boned in hand been hurting for last 16 days fuckkkkkkkkkkkkkk

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        yea will see cap chicks pretty much do get preggers after they get out jail

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        she asked me why I never told her to get off drugs shit that something she has to say so she said it and doing it so yea a difference see what happens I wreckin
        another savage in my collection of souls lol

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        jidf gonna rent us a little love nest somewhere for when she get out?
        he he he

        Like

      • Reb says:

        Broke bones calcify though

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        so harder than it was?

        Like

      • Captain Obvious says:

        Judging from the amount of resources that (((they))) have to throw au Chateau, I’d guess that purchasing you the honeymoon suite at the top of the (((Hyatt))) wouldn’t even make a dent in their budget.

        Like

    • Ironsides says:

      This is kind of the point I was trying to make with Pyongyang on the Potomac above, though yours is much more detailed (and interesting) than mine.

      It’s essentially impossible for individual men to save civilization by pimp-handing the ladies, because the action is hollow and has nothing to back it up. The situation cannot be reversed until men once again possess more societal and cultural power than women, including either the backing of the law, or the Custom of the Posse Unrestrained, to back them up.

      Plenty of individual men can pull off families still, sure. But the Single White Female is a fixture of the modern nation, the electoral shock troops of the (((tribe))), while both continue to hold power and white men continue to be powerless.

      Until white males are once again in possession of actual power, more than the women have, we will continue to occupy the role of the popular movie gladiator — possibly popular for a time, but ultimately subject to murder (figurative, usually) as soon as we’re too inconvenient to the power structure.

      Telling ordinary men, even alphas, to just man up and order their women around when the women hold all the coercive power will work in individual instances, but cannot work society-wide. It’s like buying a car without money or building a house without materials; power has to come first, and after that the patriarchy can be re-established.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Corvo says:

        Be successful. Control your woman. Have many sons. Get into positions of power/influence. Help only your fellow like-minded White men. Infiltrate, subvert and destroy anti-White structures from the inside. Fight smart and never stop fighting.

        Liked by 1 person

  19. CH, you didn’t make the updated ADL hate list. Gotta step it up.

    What’s inoculating Jewish and Asian men against this phenomenon? I’d consider both groups to have weaker game. Their governments are more nationalist but not really Autocratic, like Russia (who is also holding out okay).

    Why aren’t Israeli girls twerking to Palestinian music, or bringing Muhammed home for Passover Seder?

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      1) As tribalists, they’re immune to The Poz. [The Poz can only infect people with an innate penchant for Universal Principles, i.e. Whites.]

      2) As members of The Tribe which created The Poz, they’re in on the joke.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Oleaginous Outrager says:

      “Xenophobia” is a highly cherished trait among Asians, even a social norm, and quite often directed against other Asians (ask the average Vietnamese how they feel about the Chinese, for example).

      Israeli girls are strongly inculcated with the “Us against the entire Muslim world” attitude from birth. Of course, some probably do sample the halal offerings, but the societal and familial disapproval is still very strong in Israel.

      American Jews, on the other hand, don’t have the societal inhibitions, so they’re a bit looser with their genitals (not there’s a lot of clamor for most of ’em). Of course, Jews all tend towards insularity in a way that most whites left behind long ago, so they tend to not get subsumed by the hideous hordes.

      Like

  20. Ang Aamer says:

    I have noticed a trend late teens Early Twenties women vs the 23 plus crowd.
    And I have come to believe it’s a seeking of male dominance difference.

    There is a point in an initial conversation when a libtard dog whistle statement is made. The actual statement is irrelevant. It could be man-made global warming (note the man part). Or it could be X endeavor needs to be “Sustainable”. Or it might even be the mentioning of “rape culture” as an urgent problem.

    Now I see younger men all taking two paths on this dog whistle. They either slavishly bootlick the libtard dog whistle statement with fawning “oh yeah that’s so much a big deal” girly laugh. Or they take a neutral approach and either don’t engage on the subject or temporize and indicate they don’t think it’s a big deal.

    A curious thing I’ve noticed. The 22 and younger types don’t seem to keen on those answers. If a girl is out of college she pretty much thinks the neutral or bootlick are the only correct responses.

    Meanwhile if “I” or some other man pretty much blow up the libtard dog whistle with yep the earth is burning up right now Gonna be hot this winter! Game of Thrones is going to change the theme to Mild Autumn is Coming!

    I now see a completely different response. While the 23+ types will roll their eyes and act like they just met a neanderthal. The young ones will engage like you just said the most fascinating thing they have ever heard. These ladies WANT different information. They DESIRE to hear different words and viewpoints.

    Why? I don’t know really but I am starting to think that Trump’s election had a far more earthquake like effect than we thought. I mean Hildabeest had TV shows named for her, had books and movies all with Women leads and Women as presidents! There were marches of pink hats arranged.

    Hillary’s coronation was ORDAINED by the God of Diversity Herself! And yet she lost and lost badly.

    I think despite years of liberal indoctrination some young ladies are ready to hear the wisdom of men.

    Like

  21. Ya dingus says:

    Women will fight verbal insults with apoplectic hysteria. Women will fight verbal authoritarian behavior endlessly.

    Women will stand quiet and tolerate actual physical violence-the ultimate, worst, Civilization destroying behavior- no hysteria, no anger, their brains cannot respond to dominant physical behavior and will bow down to evil men if their good men cannot control them.

    Like

    • Reb says:

      So the choices are then virtue signal and die or pimp and live.

      Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        naa I cant even pick up a real white chick just play captain save a ho with the dregs normal whites be fine

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        well maybe could of had the 17 when she turned 18 but she got preggers lol
        guess waited too long plus the fuck was I gonna do with her long term I got to go at some point or die somethin got to pop

        Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      It’s called fear.
      They will bow down to Jamaal or Abdullah – because they’re gonna get their head ripped off (literally) if they don’t.
      They will fight Hans or Jack tooth and nail, because the worst thing that might happen to them is a slap in the face – for which Hans or Jack will then go to j@1l.

      That’s also why keyboard warriors as well as most of the ‘Alt-Right’ will savagely engage Antifa (who are mostly White and relatively harmless), but not the 17 machete-wielding Senegalese approaching them on the streets of Hamburg, Marseille or Minneapolis.

      Like

      • Ya dingus says:

        Women and most liberals have an anger scale of 1-8… 1-8 involves verbal aggression and at most slapping someone. 9 is are physical fights/rape, 10 is gunshots.
        The only whites that can confront the 9-10 spectrum destroyers of worlds from the third world etc. are right wing males; usually religious working class. Western civilization is quickly losing these soldiers for peace or making them social pariahs for using level 10 to turn everyone civil. The police can’t even do it due to social media now.

        Liked by 1 person

    • rpg says:

      Cue video of Toronto feminist getting her naked boobs groped by African homless guy. Not one shriek. Exhibit A.

      Like

  22. mendo says:

    Just got this message from our HR office:

    When it comes to saving for retirement, everyone’s situation is different–especially for women. In fact, there are several factors that can make it harder for women to save enough and have enough for retirement

    Gee, I wonder what women are doing that they never save enough. . .

    Like

  23. Winter says:

    To be honest we’re screwed. Feminist horse shit has sunk so deep into the minds of most men that they think even answering the silly bitches back is hating women. I’ve thought for ages that when it gets truly disastrous and large parts of the west are obviously falling to turd world control the silly bitches who voted to bring them in will just turn to the nearest men and blame them. Or just look at you with an absolutely clear “do something” look. They’ll just 100% leave it to us to pull all of the fat out of the fire. there will be none of the “we can do anything men can do only better” crap, they’ll be assigning roles to white men like there’s no tomorrow.

    To be honest I am bitter and long since utterly sick of it. I just want to watch as they get their full just desserts. But I expect lots of other men will jump to it for them, or at least try to.

    I guess other men around the world watching the collapse of the west will make sure their women never ever get to trash everything in their country. Western women will have ended equality BS world wide for the next century or two.

    Liked by 1 person

  24. Rick says:

    Regarding 50 shades-is it popular because the male character is good looking and dominant, rich and dominant or good looking, rich and dominant? Perhaps some women want the rich lifestyle and will go along with everything else to live that lifestyle.

    Women can take their fat tattoo ridden social media obsessed selves along with their drama and suffer. Let them cry bitch and moan all they want-I could not care less

    Liked by 1 person

    • wolfie65 says:

      Tall, good-looking, (reasonably) young and rich.
      Dominant is nice as a window dressing, but not essential.

      [CH: wrong again cubwolf. see: bill gates, mark faceborgzorg, or really any conventionally attractive beta male who puts his foot in his mouth every time he has to talk to a hottie.]

      Like

  25. hermmklklj says:

    You/Peterson lay the stress on “dominance”, it’s these days’ trend…

    But deep truthful psychology would dig a bit deeper.

    The problem is that they can’t stand freedom, liberty, beyond a certain point.

    Because having no limits… also means having no compass. No direction, in all the senses of the word “direction”. And it’s something normal minds, specially — but not limited to! — female minds, cannot stand.

    Like

  26. Mistral says:

    >They want to submit to a man, and to a society, worthy of their submission.

    As an older man, I cannot shout this from the rooftops to young guys enough.

    The postmodernists have poisoned society (Peterson has some excellent videos on how evil and bankrupt they are). That’s not just for us, but it’s also true for white women who *WANT* to love and serve a man. The good news for Chateau readers is, we know that the more we swing our big dicks, and behave like entitled jerkboys, the more pussy we reap.

    There are PLENTY of young, supple white women who WANT to be subject to a Man’s leadership. They long for it, but they’re afraid to ASK for it, so they hope you GET it.

    How then to proceed? I tell women I am interested in having around that, if they want to hop on the Mistral train, they can expect to spend most of their time with me, naked, and they’re going to get fucked a lot, i.e. whenever I feel like it. Also, they can expect to do some light housework and cooking (assuming they have the talent for it). Sure some get pissed, but plenty of them practically LEAP into my arms, and bed.

    The Men who built Civilization, the Men who ruled the world, the Men who landed on the Moon, simply have to REMEMBER who they are:

    Like

  27. Trumpette says:

    Jordan Peterson, Camille Paglia, Christine Hoff Sommers, all allies regardless of political inclinations.

    Like

  28. Moses says:

    “That is how badly, how powerfully, single White women yearn for the pimp hand.”

    Read Iceberg Slim’s autobiography “Pimp: The Story of My Life.” You will understand in spades after that how women yearn to submit. An incredible story.

    Like

  29. Doubter says:

    Wow….CH….your masterpiece. In one post you tie evo psych, game theory and social history into the most simple, distilled truth. It is all one, this problem we face.

    Game can save nations indeed….

    Like

  30. James K says:

    The relative evolutionary roles of women versus men, is men produce and women distribute, and insist on fairness.

    “We don’t know what a truly female political philosophy would be like.” He then correctly notes simply saying everyone gets the same thing, which is not a sophisticated philosophy.

    As noted in the article, it is single women who are the problem. Married women are extremely competitive with each other, and one of the battlegrounds is material success. They might want Somali immigrants to be housed, but they are damned if it will be in the district where they and their husband have sweated to buy or rent a place.

    Like

  31. Late to the post, but two quick points:

    1. Super Alpha Frank Sinatra went beta on Ava Gardner. She dumped him. He responded by turning into a snarling, nasty man for the rest of his life.

    2. In Casio Royale, James Bond goes total beta on the girl at movie end, tells her he will resign as 007 so they can travel the world, how much he loves her, etc. The girl dies before she can dump Bond, but it’s classic CH when the camera shows the disappointment in her face while Bond is puking his guts onto her.

    Apparently, when an Alpha meets “the one” he loses it. Better to stick with sluts to maintain his frame.

    Like

    • Cracker says:

      no

      it’s true that it’s harder to maintain frame with someone you’re really into so you do have to be aware of that and do the hard work it takes to keep things in line.

      but that is still a hell of a lot better than settling for sluts.

      Liked by 1 person

    • oink says:

      the failed siren song of baby boomer ‘freelove”

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply