Feed on
Posts
Comments

A great comment from Rotten, on how Whites from different American regions have responded to the forced desegregation of their nation.

Heartiste has talked about ‘Good Schools’ and other hidden taxes on whites, like the above examples of regulations and HOAs.

He’s also commented on how these taxes drive down “affordable family formation” by significantly raising the costs to have kids.

All of this relates to how boomers handled desegregation.

The California/Western approach was Racial Covenants, but the govt outlawed this (example: two future presidents lived in all white Compton, CA in 1947, blocks away from the beach and 6 miles from downtown or 5 miles to the port, but, by 1987, Compton is the most famous ghetto in America.)

The Sothern Approach was to live in the same neighborhood but have segregated facilities (similar to today’s Northern Ireland). This was struck down by courts (famous example, Selma AL was turned from a prosperous nice working city into an impoverished hellhole).

The Northern & Midwest Example was for whites to live in and sell to their own ethnic groups informally and extralegally. A city might have a little Italy and a little Germany and a little Poland. And some of this approach survives today in places like Madison, WI. But, The government mostly crushed this with school bussing, part of the Johnson and Nixon administration’s attempt to crush the power of ethnic whites within the Democrat party. (White people fled bussing, their ethnic neighborhoods didn’t re form, and midwestern cities like Detroit, or more recently Milwaukee, became shitholes).

The last legal was to discriminate was to the Puritan method (found almost exclusively in cities founded by former Puritans). Simply make everything so expensive that the diversity can’t come. To this day, San Francisco, Boston, Portland, Seattle, are all relatively peaceful and prosperous. It’s the only currently legal way to prevent diversity. But this costly model isn’t affordable or sustainable. White fertility is such places nears zero.

And cities everywhere are now trying to copy the Puritan approach, which is making the bigger problem (low white fertility due to high costs and the destruction of the white lower and middle classes) even worse. Moreover, those whites who are able to buy their way out of diversity by paying hidden taxes coalition with the Democrat party to preserve their way of life from all of the diversity that free enterprise will inflict on them. And this coalition prevents any honest discussion of race in America.

Western Whites – Racial Covenants
Southern Whites – Jim Crow
Midlands Whites – Ethnic nepotism
Puritan Whites – Discriminatory pricing

Jim Crow has received the brunt of GoodWhite Fake Moralizing, but all four approaches are designed to help Whites avoid the same end: racially mixed District 9 neighborhoods and all the crime, dreariness, annoyances, and ugliness that entails.

On the moral ledger, Puritan Whites are NO MORE MORAL than the BadWhites they have spent the past sixty-odd years demonizing for social status points and virtue sniveling accolades. The only difference is that Puritan Whites have tackled the problem obliquely instead of directly, through price and zoning controls, allowing them the necessary plausible deniability when confronted on their covert race realism.

Another civil war is all but assured as long as the regional Whites see fit to posture and deny reality for the pleasure of beating each other up for a warm glow of sanctimony; the system just cannot accommodate another sixty years of this race denial bullshit. The money or the patience will run out, and then the score settling begins.

57 Responses to “The Four Regional Approaches Whites Take To Racial Desegregation”

  1. Publius says:

    They the Jew cannot and will never stop is beyond discussion now.

    Trump, therefore, is getting what he deserves by not being Hitler and being part cuck.

    (The Don Jr thing)

    After working tirelessly to help him win the election, I offered my (substantial) services to Trump in a heartfelt letter. No response.

    We have the country we have “earned” (by fighting for nothing).

    FUCK THIS JEW EARTH.

    Like

    • Publius says:

      That.

      Like

    • Lichthof says:

      Trump has done a lot though…by himself he has changed the culture of this country and nationalism..race war is now discussed in the open. Trump is smashing the (((msm))) control of the narrative.
      I’m hearing comments even from shitlibs I would not have heard 2 years ago.
      I’d give most politicians a zero…id give Trump a 5 or 6…yeah he could have been a 10…could still be…but he could also pave the way for a brighter whiter future.

      [CH: events are moving at a rapid clip, but going from 0 to 10 is asking too much even from a god emperor.]

      Like

      • Publius says:

        (((They))) are relentless with (((their))) anti-goyim bullshit. And they won’t stop.

        He should have called up the unorganized militia on day one, as I and 30 million others advised.

        (((They))) have killed 30 million white babies.

        Are there any men in the military with any real power?

        Unlike (((Sarah clueless Silverjew)))’s jew cluelessness, we know the military “coup” would be pro-Trump , i.e., pro heritage white babies.

        Like

      • Publius says:

        By the way the current Don Jr thing is just over the top at an extreme level.

        Don Jr is son of candidate. Not candidate. He can root for his dad to win

        His crime according to THE JEW is possibly wanting to get information that would help his dad win.

        Jew not even bothering to formulate a narrative, let alone a logical one.

        The real story ( if any) is Obsma sanctioning Russia as sour grapes as a lame duck WHEN THEY KNOW THST WE KNOW THAT WHITE CHRISTISN RUSSIA IS NOT OUR ENEMY AND BOLCHEVIKS WERE JEWS.

        3 words.

        Like

      • wolfie65 says:

        I guess I’m still hoping that Trump was only the first step, and that more, bolder steps will be taken in the right directions.
        However, I also feel that politics, politicians, parties and elections may have overstayed their welcome – if ever they were welcome to begin with.

        Like

      • Marc says:

        10? Nigel says we’re takin it to 11 baby!

        Like

    • E says:

      Did these services include making fertilizer bombs?

      Like

  2. Robert What? says:

    Believe me. Having lived in Manhattan for many years, there is nobody more racist than well to do, virtue signalling, liberal Jews. They will do anything and everything to keep the vibrants out of their buildings while championing government policies to force the vibrants into your communities.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. jvo17 says:

    The converse of “Puritan Whites – Discriminatory pricing” is the “ghetto discount” you can get in NEastern cities by purchasing real estate in iffy neighborhoods.

    Like

    • Nads says:

      Same thing in large midwestern cities. If you want to be an urban pioneer, find out where they gays are living. They are the first ones back into neighborhoods. Next comes the SWPL crowd, and finally well-off families.

      Like

    • Publius says:

      This is my last comment, CH.

      Sorry to have polluted your blog for so long. Posting only from a phone, I cannot fully explain my thoughts properly. Too much work trying to keep up with all the (((bullshit))).

      I’ll be here reading but not commenting.

      Keep up the fight, goys.

      #dagoyimknow

      Liked by 1 person

  4. brocamel says:

    CH: Anglin said he mailed you a letter inquiring whether you’d like to guest post on DS and that you didn’t respond. Any possibility you’d take him up on it?

    [CH: my apologies, i miss a lot of emails. (and i’m wary of replying to emails that i suspect may be phishing operations) but sure, i’d guest post on DS. what does he want me to write about?]

    Like

  5. […] A great comment from Rotten, on how Whites from different American regions have responded to the forced desegregation of their nation. Heartiste has talked about ‘Good Schools’ and other hidden taxes continue […]

    Like

  6. jeangray07 says:

    We recently moved from a diverse, rapidly degrading suburban neighborhood that was just a tad over half white to a city even further out that is literally all white. The most common responses we get when we tell friends about our move is “oh yeah, I hear it’s nice there”, “they have great schools”, “my mom lives there and she loves it”, and my personal favorite “beautiful town, but it’s really white, isn’t it?” The last one is usually said like it’s a detriment, with a snarky little grin like they think they’re being edgy.

    We just reply with “yep”.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      When they give that last comment, tell them it’s horrible, it’s scary, and you just barely manage to make it by. Should keep them in line and avoid such areas.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Greg Eliot says:

      One can never be too rich… or too thin… or too WHITE!

      Like

    • Nads says:

      Tell them that if you want Ethiopian food, you can get it to go, until it gets dark…..

      Like

    • Ironsides says:

      Brings up something that happened at a trade show many years ago, when my parents had their own small business.

      Some chap with what I now know as cuck physiognomy came in, placed an order, then stopped to chat with me and my father. He was talking about the town he lived in, and he started saying something along the lines of,

      “The one problem that town is it’s too white. Totally boring, you know? Just white people, white people, white people.[Note: he was a white guy. Not (((white))), either.] I’ve been trying to talk some of my African-American friends into moving there, you know, finding housing for them and scouting jobs and stuff. They need more interesting people there…”

      My dad, who has never had much patience for subtlety, looked at him for a second, picked up the purchase order, tore it into pieces, and threw the pieces into the trash, then stared coldly and unblinkingly at the guy, who goggled for a few seconds before moving uncertainly off with a stunned look on his face.

      That, as Michael Corleone said, is a true story. And illustrates why I have a lot of respect for my old man.

      Like

  7. mendo says:

    San Fran has a horrible homeless problem, though. The streets smell like urine and they even had to contract with some German company to make and use urine-resistant paint.

    Like

  8. I, for one, continually resent that I had to overpay at least $60,000 – basically an entire year’s worth of net income at the time – for a home in an all-white neighborhood.

    And then there’s the periodic reminder in the form of the inflated property tax bill, which is about 50% greater than it should be…

    Like

  9. Haven M. says:

    the problem with discriminatory pricing is it it’s a burden on the whites too, eh? I mean, you get divorce raped or lose that high end job and next thing you know, your son has to go be eminem to survive in public school in the bad part of town and your daughter gets corn row weave and tatoos.

    Like

  10. tteclod says:

    I’ll make some small clarifications regarding Rotten’s summary.

    1. Asian ethnics maintain “Northern and Midwestern White” approach that Rotten describes. Muslims follow the same pattern. A smart politician in Trump’s circle should create the government regulation and lawfare framework to break that ethnic solidarity. It would do the nation good.

    2. Whites in the rural South follow an informal discrimination process. Put simply, we don’t transact business with Blacks. This is accomplished many ways, the best of which is by providing poor service to black customers, i.e.: previously competent businesses suddenly become incompetent.
    So that you don’t think I’m just blowing smoke up your ass, this is the explanation my great-grandfather gave me when I was a child visiting his farm in Texas. His father served in Florida Infantry. Many years later, my grandmother said to me (in a context I’ve forgotten), “We don’t trouble them, and they don’t trouble us.” Ten years after the city pool at the county seat integrated, the city pool was replaced, then inexplicably cracked, and then closed due to exorbitant cost for repairs. If you carefully read Southern news reports, you’ll find instances like this in public and private business everywhere. It’d make Ayn Rand proud.

    3. The Puritan discrimination approach is used all across America, and isn’t necessarily the wrong approach if properly managed. The difficulty with the approach is not that it increases costs – that’s good – it’s that it doesn’t sufficiently impact minorities AND it’s applied mostly by Puritan-descended folks who are trying to discriminate against other whites who aren’t sufficiently well bred. Yet another flaw is that some minorities, such as Jews and northeast Asians, can hack the system to gain admittance. The best application of the Puritan method is universal professional and trade licensure paired with strict enforcement and heavy fines for non-compliance. Poor (& stupid) whites can generally manage a single trade’s licensure. Foreigners, illegal aliens, and criminality-prone ethnicities are unable to comply, and thereby fail.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      I like #2 and the story that goes with it.

      Like

    • Major7 says:

      I don’t know if it’s a Southern thing or just a local thing, but our paper gets away with reporting black crime by listing their full name. Can’t tell you how many times I’ll read a name on the blotter like “John Desharznez Williams” or “Michael Boostrix Berry.” If they left out the middle name, you might think he was white. Granted, most of the names are google first, middle and last, but for the mostly ordinary (that is, white sounding) names, it’s good of them to clear up any confusion for us.

      Like

      • Nads says:

        If the crime involves using heroin, the perp is almost always white. Almost without exception, all other crimes around here are by the ethnic crowd. You don’t need to see a mugshot or read a middle name. There is a commentor on our local paper who attaches a mugshot and rap sheet from the prosecutor’s office on every criminal the paper doesn’t include a perp’s picture.

        Like

      • Major7 says:

        Good for him.

        Around here, you never hear about heroin. Meth is the white drug. Used to be a problem, but not so much anymore. Weed is bi-racial, but you rarely read about whites getting caught with it. All other crime is colored.

        Like

    • Greg Eliot says:

      1. Asian ethnics maintain “Northern and Midwestern White” approach that Rotten describes. Muslims follow the same pattern. A smart politician in Trump’s circle should create the government regulation and lawfare framework to break that ethnic solidarity. It would do the nation good.

      Pass all the laws you want, negroes only want to live near Whites, and Whites don’t want to insinuate themselves into Asian or Muslim neighborhoods.

      Laws of that kind only worked because shitskins WANTED to be near Whites… and Whites were too affluent, hence scared, to buck the law.

      Like

    • wolfie65 says:

      The f@tal flaw in the Puritan approach is precisely what tteclod mentions.
      They try to eliminate the Alien by making the air lock impenetrable for anyone EXCEPT THE MOST PARASITIC ALIEN.
      Which makes the ‘Puritan’ approach not a Whites-only approach at all, but rather a money-only approach.
      The Politically Correct Country Club.

      Meanwhile, millions of worthy – but poor – Whites have to battle it out day by day with ever more vibrant diversity outside their unhallowed gates…..

      Puritans can go get f_ck3d.

      Like

      • Major7 says:

        The money only approach does work (at least in the short term), in that if there are any black folks rich enough to afford their neighborhoods, they’re always among the talented tenth. Smart, educated, and they hate blacks too. The white folks then get to feel good about themselves, because LOOK WE HAVE BLACK FRIENDS/NEIGHBORS/CO-WORKERS etc., and they don’t/won’t realize that these blacks aren’t representative of most blacks.

        And don’t forget about regression to the mean.

        I see this same thing in Christian circles too. For example, a young pastor goes to seminary, and a few of his professors are black, he meets there a few black pastors and some of their congregation, and ends up thinking he knows black people and they’re great folks, RACISM BAD, and he never questions whether the people he met are representative of the whole.

        Like

      • vfm#7634 says:

        Puritanism is a defective philosophy built around the premise that if you’re wealthy, God has blessed you. It is pretty much asking to be taken over by sharper, more aggressive, more unscrupulous money-grubbers, whoever they are. Plus, unlike the original Puritans, Jews and Asians have nothing against cheating.

        Like

    • vfm#7634 says:

      “2. Whites in the rural South follow an informal discrimination process. Put simply, we don’t transact business with Blacks. This is accomplished many ways, the best of which is by providing poor service to black customers, i.e.: previously competent businesses suddenly become incompetent.”

      I understand that Latin people such as Mexicans and Italians do the same thing.

      Like

  11. Haven M. says:

    This discrim pricing thing reminds me of what PJ Rourke mused about 20 years ago before the great invasions. He noted that South Africa was openly racist while other countries were like this:

    1. USA with indians (i think) “we’re not racist, we’d let them live with us but … oops we killed them all”

    2. French with their Algeirs “we’re not racist but oops none of them can afford to live here”

    and so on.

    of course, now, France and everyone else has decided to end pricing by just subsidizing their invaders.

    Like

  12. Nads says:

    Portland inflated their real estate prices by severely limiting new development in the county, and now the collar counties. It was a sweet deal if you were there when it happened. You end up with houses like my relatives. Built 70-80 years ago, maybe 1200-1500 square feet, on city lots that sell for $400-$500k, in less than stellar neighborhoods.

    And they still effed it up.

    Like

  13. Nads says:

    For giggles, check out St. Clair County, illinois:

    http://www.city-data.com/county/St._Clair_County-IL.html

    Guess which part of the county has the tax base? And what part is a non-functioning cesspool?

    Like

  14. Diversity Heretic says:

    A good post but I don’t think that the Boomers are as much to blame as people think. (Since I am a Boomer, perhaps I’m being defensive.) But the “civil rights laws” and the desegreagation efforts were mostly the doing of the “Greatest Generation “(sic). The oldest Boomer was 19 in 1965 and a lot of Boomer s only became influential in public policy in the 1980s, after a great deal of the damage was done. As Sailer has pointed out on his blog, a lot of the later Boomers are the victims of the White Death.

    Like

    • oink says:

      if you dig, it goes all the way back to the Re-Formation (hi, heretix!)

      and the papist follies that preceded them (some bring up Indulgences, hi Herr Greg! for one I’m more fixated on the righteousness of baal-roasting/lemeleking one’s opponents)

      but if we won’t go that far back, 4sure, the current poz virulency is clearly rooted in illuminism and French Rebellion

      Like

  15. Carlos Danger says:

    Jim Crow is most cost effective.

    Like

  16. oink says:

    Apropos of nothing, MLK stands for Moloch.

    the more you know

    Like

  17. Carlos Danger says:

    http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-07-11/meanwhile-venezuela-real-mad-max-emerges

    This article has a wild video of a gang of thugs on motorbikes taking out a sugar truck with Molotov cocktails and looting it. Straight out of Mad Max.

    Like

  18. Exurban says:

    I spent a couple weeks last winter in Gulf Coast Florida. Between Fort Myers and Naples, the population is quite white and I swear a majority of them live in gated communities. It seems like new development is mainly more gated communities. So, this would seem to be a mixture of the Puritan price-em-out technique and the HOA drive-them-off-with-rules-they-won’t-like strategy. Many of these places are somewhat affordable, since clearly most white people can afford to live in them. There are a lot of retired people to be sure, and many people are former midwesterners. Hardly anybody seems to be from NY or NJ, in sharp contrast to the Florida east coast. It seemed like 90%+ of the population were white Americans and everybody spoke English. A surprise for sure, as previously I had only seem Miami and Jacksonville.

    Like

Leave a Reply