Feed on
Posts
Comments

I’m convinced Jordan Peterson, perhaps Canada’s only shitlord worthy of the appellation, is a long-time reader of the Chateau. Watch this video of him discussing the reality of female hypergamy (a topic covered extensively at this blog) and its influence on the dating market and you’ll see why I think that he’s been a guest at the Chateau under a pseudonym.

1:26 — “human females engage in hypergamy…women mate across and up dominance hierarchies, men mate across and down”

1:49 — “the socioeconomic status of a woman determines almost zero of her attractiveness [to] a man, whereas the socioeconomic status of a man is a major determinant of his attractiveness to a woman”

“and it isn’t his wealth [that’s attractive to women]… it’s his capacity to generate and be productive and to share”

Welcome to the Chateau, Jordan. I’m sure you’ve enjoyed your stay here.

Game is learned charisma. Another way to look at it: Game is male hypergamy, allowing men to date “across and up” in the instinctual manner that women date. The art of charisma and social dominance is essentially a flip of the evolutionary script, in which the savvy man pulls the same biomechanical levers that the average woman pulls to satisfy her urge to date up or at minimum to date across.

A good metric for determining whether your Game is Tight is to keep a mental tally of the quality of women you bed compared to your pre-Game dating life. If the number of times you dumpster dive is decreasing and the number of times you successfully grab the HBrass ring is increasing from what you used to pull in your beta days, then Game has been your friend in fitness maximization.

PS Here’s Jordan on “the shackles of marriage”:

I laughed at this because it’s a backhanded and cynical defense of marriage. JP is saying that the benefit of the marriage shackle is that you’re forced to surrender the illusion of romantic idealism for the low expectations of a humdrum honesty. Hence, the popularity of Fifty Shades of Bullwhip with married women.

12 Responses to “Jordan Peterson On Female Hypergamy”

  1. l82dagame says:

    My favorite time in CH history was when someone close up to Trump was obviously here, CH said if Trump proposed cutting off all Muslim immigration that his poll numbers would jump, then Trump did exactly that. It’s understandable that Trump can’t echo CH anymore, just like Roger Stone, but those were some good, exciting times. Besides a largely ignored Washington Post article, no other media connected Trump to CH.

    Like

    • mendo says:

      In some ways, I do miss the campaign for those reasons you mentioned.

      There was great energy at his speeches and I’d always be eager to listen in on them even though many were the same, he’d always bring up something new to them.

      His twitter was shivvier–of course, he wasn’t the president yet–and watching (((them))) lose their shit over each word was beautiful.

      Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      This Time Magazine cover & the associated article were plagiarized straight from a poast of mine chez Le Chateau:

      Like

    • Do you know which WaPo article? I can only find one mention in a 2014 piece about Elliot Rodger and the manosphere.

      Like

  2. 007 says:

    I remember that and i think the moment Trump became “The One” was when he said he wants to stop muslim immigration. From there onwards, noting and nobody could stop him. People threw their lot with him.

    Like

  3. Flip says:

    Trump started to rise and Jeb! started to fall when they disagreed on immigration.

    Like

  4. mendo says:

    Could he be ‘Canadian Friend’ perhaps?

    Like

  5. George says:

    Jordan Peterson on Canada and free speech: http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/civil-rights/301661-this-canadian-prof-defied-sjw-on-gender-pronouns-and-has-a

    Coming to a theater near you….

    Like

  6. Villea says:

    ” Another way to look at it: Game is male hypergamy, allowing men to date ‘across and up’ in the instinctual manner that women date.”

    Absolutely disagree. Game is the way you move up in the dominance hierarchy so you can be level with the women you date. “The game” is not a game between man and women, it is purely a game between men.

    If you are in environment where you have 100 professional sports millionaires (not the nerdy kind, think one hundred Tom Bradys) with you, there is no game that will save you. If you are in an environment with 100 nerds, you need very little game to get the top girl. Because the game is not trying to look better to the women. The game is to be better than all the other men.

    Now you might think that using “game techniques” you are duping women. No, to do something better is actually to move up the male hierarchy. Hence, you do not have male hypergamy, what you have is a male moving up the hierarchy.

    Like

    • Captain Obvious says:

      The game” is a game between YOU and HER HAMSTER [her hindbrain].

      Her Hamster [her hindbrain] was created by the L0rd G0d Almighty [or maybe by Lucifer, if the LGA went fishing that afternoon] to sniff out the very slightest hint of weakness in you.

      Game teaches you how to confuse her hamster, get it off balance, anger it, humor it, frustrate it, assault it, massage it, orgasm it, brutalize it, stroke it, walk away from it.

      Her Hamster wants to see a little mean & nasty & cheat & thief & brute & stone cold k!ller in you, and Game teaches you how to fake it til you make it.

      ‘Cause NICE GUYS ALWAYS FINISH LAST, and her Hamster can sniff “Nice” on you from a mile away.

      Like

  7. driveallnight says:

    Jourdan’s come a long way since being fined $100 by pleasureman

    Like

  8. jabowery says:

    Culture is artificial selection. Race is the result. What does our culture select for? Well, I’ll tell you one thing for damn sure — it’s selecting _against_ the very things its economy demands. The bidding war for young women between the economy and the family is a de facto sterilization program targeting the fertile years of women.

    Like

Leave a Reply