Where pretty lies perish.
May 23rd, 2017 by CH
Story. It won’t be long before genes linked to race differences in behavior and intelligence are identified.
Are equalist shitlibs feeling like this:
or more like this?:
Bonus shitlib cogdis BTFO: Our common chimp ancestor may have been from Europe rather than from Africa.
"H1B abusers"
This rhetoric is damning of Trump's real intentions. The crisis facing us isn't the problem of "abusers" of the system. The crisis is the system ITSELF.
We should be going after the H1B program in its entirety, not just the abusers of it.
Same with immivasion. We should be deporting all of them, not just the "violent criminals".
The System must be repealed.
The Tyler Robinson conspiracy theories remind me that Occam's Razor has taken a beating over the last decade.
Robinson's father turned him in, and I doubt the decision to rat out his own son was a difficult moral quandary for him, knowing that his degenerate son was fucking a dude in his cosplay foxhole.
It must have felt like excising a demon from the family, and restoring the reputation of his good name.
"Here's where Cameron goes berserk."
"Aaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh (my dick)!"
Here's hoping the faggot troonfucker freakazoid gets the firing squad. They have that execution option available in Utah.
I've made this point as well. If there is an issue that can unite left-wing and right-wing White, it is opposition to Orwellian surveillance.
The other issue is environmentalism, but it has to be couched in terms acceptable to right-wing Whites, eg despoliation of the land by filthy invaders and overcrowding, while framing it as invasive species pushing out the native species from their habitats.
In time, I believe that right and left Whites will unite against Zionism and rapacious wall street capitalism, but for that to happen leftoid Whites will need to unlatch from the secular jewish agitprop teat and rightoid Whites will need to unlatch from the bootstraps foxnews teat.
It is in both Whites' and jews' interests for the two races to be separated, but jews will never agree to it because their sociobiologically evolved resource extractive programming requires a host to realize net gains for jewry.
Whites are the race LEAST likely to "go crazy all of a sudden", so when it seems that way to jews, it means Whites have suffered jewish subversion long enough and have decided to stop tolerating it.
U.S. District Judge Lynn Adelman fined her $5,000, describing the case as a situation where an otherwise good person, upset by immigration policies in this country, made a bad decision in the moment.
It's a jew. Again.
Like it or not, America must lose this war of aggression against Iran, for White Americans to win the war of a genuine homeland.
The weimarican empire must meet defeat after defeat, failure upon failure. Globohomo must not be allowed a single moment of self-congratulation.
It is for this reason that I fear Trump and Israel, implicitly understanding the wider implications of this war, may turn to nukes if Iran gets the upper hand.
Yup, 1945-1970 America was 90% White, and that period coincided with what is known as "the Great Compression". Economic policies in the wake of the New Deal established a regime of rising single-earner wages, declining inequality, increasing happiness, and a decreasing income and wealth gap between the ownership class and the labor class.
1970 was the inflection point when all that began to unravel, and then accelerate under Reaganism.
What are the odds Vox will retract their article?
https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/5/18/15655638/charles-murray-race-iq-sam-harris-science-free-speech
LikeLike
Zero. After all, Vox is one of many “little Pravda’s” charged with spreading the Cathedral party line. That said I did find the article about Harris’ inteview with Murray interesting and am now going to actually listen to it even though I gave up wasting time on things like podcasts years ago. I realize that before I comment I should probably listen to the podcast but I’m going to go ahead and make the assumption that Murray is not a complete idiot and that thus there are a lot of strawmen in the Vox piece. The article is also valuable in elucidating some of the ways the Poz maintains its scientific orthodoxies in the face of a rising tide of hatefacts. So they start off with:
Heritability is not unique to IQ; in fact, virtually all differences among individual human beings are somewhat heritable. Pairs of identical twins are more likely to be similar not only in height and weight and skin color compared with fraternal twins, but also in their marital status, their political views, and TV-watching habits.
This point is even restated later…
To say that intelligence is heritable means that, in general, people who are more similar genetically are also more similar in their IQ. Identical twins, who share all their DNA, have more similar IQs than fraternal twins or siblings, who only share half. Half-siblings’ IQs are even less similar than that; cousins, still less.
They also place the following as a fact supported by current science though they put it at the bottom of their list of accepted knowledge:
4) Discoveries about genetic ancestry have validated commonly used racial groupings.
Of course now it’s time to invoke the fuzzy “social constructs” of folk race wisdom to blunt the impact of these things.
Our lay concept of race is a social construct that has been laid on top of these vastly more complex biological realities. That is not to say that socially defined race is meaningless or useless. (Modern genomics can do a good job of determining where in Central Europe or Western Africa your ancestors resided.)
Good, this is part of the strategy – admit that your opponent has a point and concede the parts of the truth that have become obvious so as to seem reasonable and open minded. Then, however, we unleash the strawman army:
The new DNA-based science has also led to an ironic discovery: Virtually none of the complex human qualities that have been shown to be heritable are associated with a single determinative gene! There are no “genes for” IQ in any but the very weakest sense.
Is this really what Murray believes? that we are looking for or have found some one “gene for IQ”? Again, I haven’t listened to the podcast but this is part of where I give Murray the benefit of the doubt that he is not an imbecile.
It can also help to befuddle the reader about the very nature of science:
Murray makes a rhetorical move that is commonly deployed by people supporting his point of view: They stake out the claim that at least some of the difference between racial groups is genetic, and challenge us to defend the claim that none, absolutely zero, of it is. They know that science is not designed for proving absolute negatives, but we will go this far: There is currently no reason at all to think that any significant portion of the IQ differences among socially defined racial groups is genetic in origin.
Yeah, Science Bitches!
Except that actually, science is about disproving the null hypothesis, which in this case is that there is NO genetic difference between “socially defined racial groups”. This last bit is also a little sleight of hand as we substitute the less reliable social races for the much better delineated ones you can define using gene groups. As I showed above the authors themselves even admit that:
Modern genomics can do a good job of determining where in Central Europe or Western Africa your ancestors resided.
and now a minstrel show with more strawmen:
However, a willingness to speak casually about modern racial groupings as simplifications of the ancient and turbulent history of human ancestry should not deceive us into conjuring back into existence 19th-century notions of race — Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid, and all that.
So again, we’re asked to imagine Murray as one of those 19th century cartoonists drawing exaggerated pictures of Negroes with giant lips and Chinamen whose eyes are squinted closed. Really? I would agree that if this is what Murray believes then he’s not worth considering. The fact that the authors (academics) took the time to refute him though suggests that his real position is a bit different. How many articles in Physics Today are devoted to refuting flat earthers?
There’s also some other liberal chicanery on display such as just carrying the discussion off on useless tangents. You see this in the discussion of the Flynn Effect and that poverty lowers IQ. Neither of these effects is surprising (both likely due to better nutrition, fewer brain damaging childhood diseases and just more practice taking IQ tests in the case of Flynn) and neither addresses evidence that controls for these things still showing a “racial” effect.
The authors last section is actually entitled “A common fallacy: Murray is disliked by liberals (and especially college students); therefore he must be right on the facts”. I found this a bit curious and even funny – “a common fallacy”? Amongst whom? Certainly not media, college kids, or (dishonest mainstream) academics. It’s almost like the authors know in their hearts that liberals are so often wrong about more or less everything that it’s a good heuristic if you want to be correct (if not popular) to assume that the truth is pretty much the opposite of what they believe on any topic!
The 52 genes that CH references are most assuredly not “social constructs” though and it will be interesting and probably, for devoted Pozmen and Pozwomen terrifying, to discover how this gene cluster relates to the ones that define ancestry (and are at the root of our folk wisdom about “races”)
LikeLike
So I fucked up my blockquotes and it looks like there’s no edit button. Can the mods fix this a bit? Thanks.
LikeLike
Genes link to intelligence – science.
Genes linked to racial differences – thought crime.
Because? – Just shut up.
LikeLiked by 2 people
What the hell is going on in the Jewish power structure that this made it to publication in the mainstream?
“Bonus shitlib cogdis BTFO: Our common chimp ancestor may have been from Europe rather than from Africa.”
Next thing you know they will be talking about this:
solutrean hypothesis
and the misplaced early bronze age artifacts.
LikeLike
— What the hell is going on in the Jewish power structure that this made it to publication in the mainstream?
And last week, BBC aired a three-part miniseries on Rotherdam that by accounts I read, pulled no punches on race.
[CH: hm, if this is a trend, it could be evidence that the western ruling elite are getting nervous about overthrow.]
LikeLiked by 1 person
Jez letting a little steam out of the kettle…
LikeLike
I lean toward “getting nervous.” It’s counter-Machiavellian to validate the oppressed party’s grievances on a taboo subject.
LikeLike
PA – all due respect — but not so much with the BBC production:
http://www.europeancivilwar.com/bbc-scum-sink-to-new-low/
The girls were “victims of misogyny” and Islam is never mentioned as a factor contributing to the abuse. The Beeb admitted soft-pedaling the truth so that patriotic organizations like the EDL wouldn’t get any traction out of it. Ironic, since the Beeb covered it up while it was happening, and the EDL and BNP were some of the few organizations trying to get action taken.
LikeLiked by 1 person
(((They))) sense the changing winds of power. (((They))) have always tried to ingratiate themselves with whoever (((they))) thought was about to seize the reins.
LikeLike
Bonus shitlib cogdis BTFO: Our common chimp ancestor may have been from Europe rather than from Africa.
This should cause some people to go ape shit. I like, I like!
LikeLike
Our culture doesn’t even value intelligence. And “behavior genes” will just be another excuse for muds to escape accountability.
LikeLike
“And “behavior genes” will just be another excuse for muds to escape accountability.”
This is brutally true about America. This culture doesn’t give a fuck about an individual’s intelligence. Americans worship J. Timberlake, not I. Newton.
LikeLike
Our common ancestor may be from Europe.
Their common ancestor may be from elsewhere.
LikeLiked by 1 person
In that article the Narrative Enforcers fell over themselves to assert how the genetic effect is “minuscule” and how “intelligence is profoundly shaped by the environment”.
In the real science of biology, there is no quarter for the Hivemind’s most valuable (for their agenda) illusions, and every day, the evidence mounts against them.
One glorious day all people will look at blank slatism the way we look at alchemy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
See: The Bell Curve, by Charles Murray and the critics response.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know, I first read it years ago.
Gay Mulatto himself pronounced it “racist” so in their minds that was their green light to not have to think about or debate the BC findings again.
LikeLike
‘the genetic effect is “minuscule”’
In a similar vein, there’s always the switcheroo from “valuing diversity” to “our genes are only like 0.0002% different!” when the subject of race comes up. One gene is enough to make a difference.
LikeLike
[…] 52 Genes Linked To Human Intelligence […]
LikeLike
Reading the article about the older European ancestor, could the first white humans have simply evolved first? Our racial cousins are simply a few thousand or million years behind. Colonialism starts to make a lot more sense with guiding European benevolence lifting up those races trying to catch up.
Also helps explain why Euro states are needed. The primitive hatred of the more evolved makes sense as a survival strategy. We must protect ourselves by separation at the national level.
LikeLike
I’ve often wondered if the whites are the oldest subspecies, explaining why they’re capable of so much that the others just aren’t. And yes, we need to use borders to protect ourselves from underdeveloped hordes; they may not be able to help being primitive ape-men, but that doesn’t mean we need to put our necks on the chopping block for the “crime” of additional evolution, either.
LikeLike
I always thought the chest-pounding of shitskins over the Out O’ Africa stuff was just so much folderol, especially the “we wuz first” false pride..
Because when you really think about it, if’n they truly “wuz first”, that should have given them a leg-up on this whole evolution thing, amirite?
Yet even a one-eyed man could tell that, as a race, they were a whole lot less developed in diverse beauty and intelligence.
I think when looking objectively at the races of the world, it makes sense to imagine that the various evolution paths of each were diverse enough and long enough ago to make any question of who was first immaterial.
I’m hoping Whites don’t now play into their frame and act like being first is some sort of significant bragging right.
Hell, if there was no such thing as a blue-eyed blonde or green-eyed redhead until 10000 B.C., what does it mean? We’re here now, and are the Gold Standard of both beauty and brains.
LikeLiked by 1 person
‘various evolution paths ‘
What the FUCK?!? When did you give up Christianity and adopt the false religion of Darwinism?!?!
LikeLike
You’re showing your ignorance again, jones.
Who says that continuous development and improvement of a self-sustaining ecosystem, replete with flora and fauna, can’t be part of God’s Creation?
If anything, a system that, once created, can continue to evolve of its own accord would be MORE in line of what a true God could plan and implement… second only to Free Will as the ne plus ultra of creativity..
LikeLike
I should note that when I speak of evolution, I mean development WITHIN KIND, so to speak.
How one cares to define the boundaries of KIND, I leave that to wiser haids than mine.
LikeLike
LikeLike
To go along with the video, no one can actually make an argument for evolution: only compare it to other religions.
Which is to say – no one can make an argument for evolution. If it’s science, you can make an argument for it. Note – you can make an argument for religion.
I’m learning about the Frankfurt School, lol, and it strikes me that with evolution, it’s very similar. It’s not actually a thing, so it’s better not to fall into the frame of actually arguing against it. Just dismiss it and focus on honing dismissals.
LikeLike
‘If anything, a system that, once created, can continue to evolve of its own accord would be MORE in line of what a true God could plan and implement…’
God, if the word God means ANYTHING, should be able to make the Perfect World with a snap of his fingers.
No delays. No evolution. No millions of years waiting for the “plan” to take shape.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Best_of_all_possible_worlds
LikeLike
Why is a world with evolution imperfect?
Just think of it as performance art rather than a static painting.
LikeLike
Even Biblical God took 7 days just to make the earth.
Human history didn’t just “automatically” happen either, took a little bit so don’t know where your going with this.
LikeLike
God, if the word God means ANYTHING, should be able to make the Perfect World with a snap of his fingers.
No delays. No evolution. No millions of years waiting for the “plan” to take shape.
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
We’ve been over this territory many times in the past… Man’s definition of what words like “perfect”, “omnipotent”, and “omniscient” SHOULD mean, in relation to God’s characteristics, are not even in the same realm as what the One True God actually entails, and the rules of the various microcosms He Himself set forth.
Free will alone tells us these things, and what may start out as perfect can be corrupted by the perfect being himself. This is the power and majesty and danger and true cause of interest of such a creation as Free Will.
But you, as a mere man, are going to say “Well, then this isn’t PERFECT, so there!” with a neener-neener?
(((shakin’ mah haid)))
The fellow who mentioned watching a drama unfold rather than merely staring at a static painting made a fine analogy… humans themselves would be bored by the latter, and God made creation for His enjoyment and interest.
It’s statements like that of our jonesy that give true meaning to the Scripture:
Isaiah 55:9
“As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.
LikeLike
‘Free will alone tells us these things, and what may start out as perfect can be corrupted by the perfect being himself. This is the power and majesty and danger and true cause of interest of such a creation as Free Will.’
Here’s word for that (casuistry) -the use of clever but unsound reasoning, especially in relation to moral questions; sophistry.
synonyms: sophistry, specious reasoning, speciousness, sophism, equivocation
blah blah blah
Yep. As for Isaiah 55:9 “As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.”
I am prepared to admit the Creator’s ways and thoughts are higher than mine (assuming there is a Creator). No quarrel about that.
OK. ‘Just think of it as performance art rather than a static painting.’ Maybe. Sure why not. The whole of history might be one great act of performance art. Fair enough.
LikeLike
John Hawks ain’t havin’ none of it. Just another fuckin monkey, he opines.
http://www.johnhawks.net/weblog/fossils/miocene/graecopithecus/graecopithecus-fuss-2017.html
LikeLike
Regarding the new Out-of-Europe (and not Africa) hypothesis, I had the following conversation with a friend.
Me: Yay! Now they won´t be able to tell give us the you-can´t-exclude-Africans because-we-all-come-from-Africa line so as to force us to accept mass migration.
He: Well, they will now say Africans have a right of return (to Europe).
So true. So sad.
LikeLike
I’ve been thinking about this for some time, and I’m no longer convinced that “Intelligence” is the marker that leads to progress, but rather a completely separate marker: “I want to see you succeed”.
Most of mankind does not possess this marker. “I want to see you fail” is common, as is “I want to have what you have”. But selfless help-you-out-ism is unheard of throughout most of our species.
Why do I think Intelligence is not the true marker of success? Because I’ve met too many very smart people who wouldn’t lift a finger to help another person. Anecdotal evidence, obviously, but I’ve known people who would rather fail themselves than accidentally allow someone else to succeed by their efforts. These people were not “badwhites”.
There’s something special in working as a group to achieve success. Every voice may contain wisdom, provided every voice wishes to see ultimate success for the group. If the group is comprised of people who need to see their neighbors fail, that they may by comparison FEEL successful, then those voices can’t be trusted to be helpful.
I’ve read numerous studies that state matter-of-factly that jews and asians are more intelligent than white people, yet I wouldn’t want to live in ANY of the nations dominated by them. Because their nations suck. They’re awful places full of awful people.
I’m thinking altruism is the marker (I could be wrong), but really the marker should be “not-a-sociopath”.
You don’t need the smartest people on earth to create a good society, you only need all members to want, at a genetic level, their own neighbors to succeed. Then they’ll help without the need for compulsion.
True success will be that, plus guardedness against outsiders. I don’t know what to call that combination.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well there are two ways to win a footrace. One is to train, eat right, work on mental focus, and then run knowing your competition probably did so too. The other is to bring a gun to the race and shoot all the other runners in the foot. Now sporting events have judges and in this case, police to prevent that kind of thing. Evolution doesn’t know the difference and doesn’t give a fuck. All it sees is the winner. The (((Tribe))) combines slightly better than 100 average IQ (the white N. American norm) with a strong willingness to sabotage non-tribesmen. Owing to the fact that they have become specialized as parasites (with a large symbiotic role though) in many other societies this is, overall, devastatingly disruptive. Asians are less interested in sabotaging outsiders than in building walls to keep them out. The Chinese, after all built the first “Trumpenmauer” in history thousands of years ago. Owing to the fact that Asian societies even today, including the Big One I just mentioned, remain isolationist and xenophobic, I would say this is another factor in favor of China and its satellites becoming dominant and the West continuing its decay into a third-world-ized shithole.
In the movie “Looper” Young Joe wants to learn a second language and chooses French. When he meets Abe the mob boss from 2077 or so, Abe tells him this is stupid and to learn Mandarin. Prophecy perhaps?
LikeLike