Feed on
Posts
Comments

Flooziognomy Is Real

Slut eye is real.

It really is easy to identify a slut by her appearance and mannerisms.

Yes, Vaginia, ¡SCIENCE! confirms the wisdom of the womanizers: You can tell long before she’s tapped your bank account if a woman is commitment-worthy, or courtesan-dirty.

What your face says about your mating preferences

Three-quarters of people can tell your mating preferences just from looking at your face. […]

Men who have large noses, square jaws and small eyes, are apparently telling the world they prefer short-term relationships, research finds.

Women with larger lips and wide eyes are sending the same short-term relationship signal — whether they like it or not.

I.e., more neotonously feminine women (the eternal ingenue).

The conclusions come from a study in which people were shown faces and asked to guess their attitudes to:

  • Short-term relationships,
  • one-night stands,
  • and sex without love.

Incredibly, 72% accurately identified the sexual attitudes of men and women just from photos of their faces.

Women who enjoy those three romantic options are more likely to be sluts than women who prefer long-term committed relationships. So what this study has revealed is that men can tell by a woman’s face if she’s inclined to ride the cock carousel on repeat and then spend her post-roadie whore years a raving neocon Russophobe, or if her lifetime cock notches can still be counted on one hand.

The study doesn’t mention it, but it’s a good bet more men than women prefer STRs, ONSs, and NSA sex, although I’ve no doubt our Fifty Shades of Faceborgian modwomen are catching up to their porn-satiated mansupials. Nevertheless, knowledge is power, especially knowledge of the sexual market, and it’s in every man’s interest (even the sniveling manlets’) to know if the women he wants to meat will go all the way right away or if they’re worth slow-cooking to a mushy suburban bliss.

54 Responses to “Flooziognomy Is Real”

  1. nads says:

    “women he wants to meat will go all the way right away or if they’re worth slow-cooking to a mushy suburban bliss.”

    Never heard it called that, but it fits. Usually it is the women with the desire for meat…

    Like

  2. mendo says:

    spend her post-roadie whore years a raving neocon Russophobe

    Lovely surgical shiv to everyone’s favorite paranoid whore.

    Like

  3. […] Flooziognomy Is Real […]

    Like

    • Sean Fielding says:

      From Michael Kimmel’s Wiki entry: born in Brooklyn, self-identified male feminist, wife named Edelman, teaches in greater NYC. So 99.99% chance he’s (((tribe))).

      Every fuckin’ time.

      Of course the director of the “Center for the Study of Men and Masculinities” has to be a male feminist Skype. Of course his interview with The Gayardian and his Skypey book focus on ‘neo-Nazis’ while ignoring the tens of millions of ordinary White American men who love Trump.

      These people have brought every pogrom in history upon themselves.

      Liked by 2 people

    • Days of Broken Arrows says:

      Why do these people focus on the so-called “anger” of white men, when the real anger is being done by blacks who are shooting each other at insanely high rates in Baltimore and Chicago?

      You’d think a GOOD writer would know the written word counts for a lot less than what happens in real life. So, no matter how “angry” white men appear online, what ultimately matters more to the fabric of society is the massive body counts left by black men.

      What does this idiot think — that all the shooting is being done out of mercy, not anger? When people look back at out society, they’re going to wonder why writers focused on these things the way they did: “Blacks are killing each other like it’s a war zone, but let’s scold those white guys for their blogs!!”

      [CH: anti-whites often deliberately misinterpret justified white anger as irrational rage.]

      Like

      • Days of Broken Arrows says:

        Another comment stuck in moderation. This is really getting on my nerves.

        Like

      • gunslingergregi says:

        good question might be where are the white people
        100’s and 100’s of thousands of people disapear
        and
        crickets

        Like

      • Carlos Danger says:

        If white’s aren’t around they won’t wonder at anything.

        Like

      • Random Guy says:

        Always been that way; only something like 1/20 Trans sorts killed are white and the rest are all basically hispanic and black.

        Clearly Black People and Hispanics have far greater hostility and are a much greater threat to gays than whites are. But you never hear about it directed at them.

        Recent stuff is going on about “increased hate crimes” by white people but don’t deal with schools entire Asian population of students refusing to go in or 85% of San Fran’s crimes being black on Asian? Hispanic neighborhoods doing their own protests about being tired of being victimized by black people?

        Never seems to come up all that much in the main stream media does it?

        Like

  4. Publius X Maul says:

    Every fucking time.

    https://www.thetrace.org/2017/02/constitutional-carry-gun-rights-absolutists/

    This (((guy))) pretends to be a gun guy. Subversive.

    Like

    • Oleaginous Outrager says:

      “Like President Trump and his top advisor, Stephen Bannon, constitutional-carry activists are unconcerned by any wider distress their agenda may cause. Like the new White House, they see the trampling of existing norms as the removal of obstacles.”

      Absolutely goddamn right, Adam Whinestein, you feeble-minded, gutless pile of shit. Your feelings, and that of your waste of space friends, amount to exactly dick in the scheme of things, so fuck off to the nearest corner and cry your little eyes out, ’cause we have not a solitary fuck to give.

      Like

  5. Publius X Maul says:

    Why the fuck does Sheppard Smith have a show on Fox?

    Unbelievably huge faggot enemy of the people.

    He should slice lengthwise.

    W Bush too.

    Fuck off, traitor.

    Liked by 1 person

    • TLM says:

      Went to HS with a chick whose eyes were way too far apart just like Shepard Smith’s. Makes for an extra creepy looking fag.

      Like

  6. Haven M. says:

    big lips and far apart eyes? hmmmm.

    Like

  7. says:

    I hold out hope that Miss Mensch can be saved from Gehenna.

    Like

  8. “Women with larger lips and wide eyes are sending the same short-term relationship signal — whether they like it or not”.

    The first time I ever saw Angelina Jolie I thought, “That’s a slut. A good looking slut, but, nonetheless. Her subsequent dating experiences over the years proved this to be true. Her psycho relation with Billy Bob Thornton, her lesbian affair, her sexcapades with most of the male cast in Alexander, etc. Sure, she looks like she could suck the chrome off a trailer hitch. However, she is the type of woman that would not have aged well if she didn’t have millions to get every part of her body replaced, paid trainers, and surgeons for liposuction and every possible surgery to her face. And if she hadn’t sold her soul to Lucifer.

    Like

    • Alfonso says:

      She has not aged well. Even make up cannot hide it.

      Liked by 1 person

      • nads says:

        See Hackers from 1995. She was 20 years old – demure and hot. She now has that ridden hard and put up wet look.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Random Guy says:

        Should have stayed with her Tomb-Raider era physique instead of trying to do slim and skinny. Harder to pull off as you age.

        Like

    • tomjones says:

      If she had her father in her life, she might have been a traditional woman. But I doubt it. The more and more I about it, it seems to me that all of us are destined to follow our DNA. DNA is Fate.

      In other words, our genes determine everything -our one-night stands (or not), faithful monogamy (or not), our careers (or no career), our politics, our mannerisms, who we find attractive, who we find obnoxious, who we find clever, etc.

      Like

    • SteveRogers42 says:

      Exactly. World-class looks on a world-class tramp.

      Like

    • CarpeOro says:

      I present exhibit A. Known as the premier sex symbol during her day, fits the descriptors to a T. Also, she didn’t just hit the wall, she drove the fastest car she could find smack into it. Exhibit A? Bridget Bardot. Wide eyes, big lips, and bat sh*t crazy.

      Like

    • I used to like her too but I agree with the others. She has not aged well. That darkness in her soul is finally shining through. Just like it does for all the evil ones. Right CO?

      Like

  9. says:

    They carry on like sons of Adam when they should be sons of God.

    Liked by 1 person

  10. tteclod says:

    “…it’s a good bet more men than women prefer STRs, ONSs, and NSA sex…”

    No.

    The jealousy any woman exhibits is not mate-guarding. It’s resource defense.

    Can a short term sexual relationship get her the sperm she wants to complement the beta cuck she’s hooked? ONS? NSA? Then any of those, or ALL of those, is fine by her.

    Don’t convince yourself otherwise.

    [CH: well, most studies have in fact found a sex-based difference in the preference for short-term lovestuff, and that in general men are more open to flings and ONSs than are women.]

    Like

  11. cortesar says:

    Like

    • nads says:

      We had a woman at work absolutely destroy her new convertible on a parking island curb. She was cutting across the parking lot early one morning and hit it going 20 MPH. Sheared the oil pan, broke the engine mounts, dented the hood from the inside and ruined the steering front suspension. She was looking in the mirror at her make up…

      Like

  12. The Judge says:

    Worth noting that even the eternal ingenue, with her coquettish demeanor, fuckme face, and secretly insatiable need for cock, has her 5 minutes of alpha, and she will drop everything for him, even years later. I’ve seen it.

    Liked by 2 people

  13. Russian says:

    So, Nikolai Valuev has a super promiscuous face, and yet he’s with the same woman for 20 years. Helps she didn’t get fat.

    Like

  14. Ponce du Lion says:

    @CH Questions: more neotenous girls are more attractive girls. So more attractive women are sluttier? Wasn’t it the other way the last time we talked about it?

    Like

  15. Jack says:

    You seem to be implying more feminine appearing women are sluttier…I though it was more masculine women…

    Like

    • Random Guy says:

      Yeah; doesn’t seem like I would say the Eternal Ingenue is an apt description here.

      Especially since “big lips and wide eyes” probably goes to Hispanics, Africans and Polynesian women as a descriptor before White Women.

      Like

Leave a Reply