Feed on
Posts
Comments

The Wash Post-Op anti-White propaganda blitz by Jonathon Morgan.

The debunking.

Will the Post-Op issue a retraction?

Not holding breath…

8 Responses to “This Washington Post-Op Analysis Charting “Radicalization” of the Alt-Right Was Thoroughly Debunked (but will anyone care?)”

    • mendo says:

      Instead, please use the term “googums”. Thank you.

      Liked by 2 people

    • How many true Whites have a black ‘friend’? And if they use this term ‘niggums’ (which I’ve never heard and seems retarded, possibly shitthatdidn’thappen), then they’re goons who don’t understand that they’re probably the kind of White person that blacks mock the most. Coworkers to the extent that blacks hold jobs and/or acquaintances is usually the depth of White/black friendship. ymmv.

      Like

      • Doug Huffman says:

        A friend is someone one is better for knowing than not. Only a C***servative has many friends.

        Like

      • JironGhrad says:

        @ Col Hogan, I’ve known a few. All of them were active or former military and all integrated, all (with one exception) were of clearly-mixed white heritage.

        Like

  1. […] This Washington Post-Op Analysis Charting “Radicalization” of the Alt-Right Was Thoroughly Debun… […]

    Like

  2. Random Guy says:

    This is one of the things I hate about the liberals and SJW types and I’m somewhat on the liberal side myself, especially for this place, is the hypocrisy and the total unwillingness to admit when they are wrong or apologize to someone whose life they very well could have ruined or effective did even if it turns out they were wrong.

    That and their unwillingness to either research something or to twist the truth until it suits their needs. As bad the hardcore right racists in their own way as that.

    But at least the hardcore right racists actually have “something” backing them and their views up, the left not so much.

    Like

Leave a Reply