European natives are grappling with the issue of free speech. Reader Cortesar writes,
“European Framework National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance” [is] a model law which defines the limits of tolerance”
It is safe to say that Orwell is turning in [his] grave overwhelmed by jealousy. How in the hell he could not come up with such a brilliant concept as “a framework for promotion of tolerance which defines the limit of tolerance”
——————————————————————————————————
“We need practical solutions and so we have prioritised the adoption of the European Framework National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance.”This Model Law, drafted by leading European experts and legislators, and supported by the EJC, defines the limits of tolerance, which is the demand for security. This is intended to be a pan-European law that for the first time deals with not only the general commitment to tolerance, but defines the values that needs preserving and the limitation of tolerance towards
minority groups who risk the security of other minorities and of their host countries.
——————————————————————————————————-
Behold the universally beneficial uses of high IQ.
It comes down to this: Free speech, small government, community trust, and, among other virtues, a public sphere blessedly unpolluted by leftoid newspeak, are incompatible with a massive, multiracial, legalistic conglomerate of spineless cowards, pacified matrix pods, and malicious parasites. America and the EU will have to break apart if they are to survive united.
UPDATE
Related: Commenter Flip notices the belching of the Hivemind Hatemachine:
I went to one of the Ivy League colleges and flip through the alumni magazine, and every page is dripping with hostility to straight, white, Gentile males.
That’s the alpha and omega of 21st century America right there. Underneath all the stürm und drang it’s just white hot hatred for flyover straight white gentile men. Time to throw a wrench in the machine.
[…] Forked-Tongue Leftoid Poopytalk […]
ALL THE SINGLE LADIES… LIVE IN COPENHAGEN… In the Greater Copenhagen area, there are now 10,000 more single women between the ages of 18-48 than single men in the same age group… http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3267323/posts
Big cities are where wombs go to shrivel and die.
C, that’s correct, but consider that it’s also INTENTIONAL. H: “white hot hatred for flyover straight white gentile men” is consistent with walling off the men in the provinces and luring their young & fertile women into the [walled] imperial cities with the promise of bright & shiny trinkets [cf child molesters luring children into cargo vans with the promise of halloween candy]. When women are physically removed from their men, either they grow old and barren and become cat ladies, or else they become mudsharks and fornicate with the close-proximity nogs [whose presence in the walled imperial cities is paid for by the taxes levied on the white men working in the provinces] and those mudshark race-traitoresses give birth to mystery-meat abominations.
I live in the Netherlands, me and my brother are going to Roskilde not too long from now, … which is in Denmark. SCORE !!!
The single women all live in Copenhagen (and other cities) for a very simple reason:
80% of women are fucking 20% of men.
The vast majority of women go off in search of socially connected, wealthy alphas. Those men live in cities.
When women arrive in cities, their lifestyle consists of “working until marriage” — although marriage is unlikely to come for many. Why? Because even though these women have average looks, it isn’t hard to get a weekly helping of alpha cock. And because young women’s biological imperative is not, as is commonly held, to pair-bond but instead to be a sperm-receptacle for high-value men — These women will remain single throughout their 20’s.
They will spread their legs repeatedly for the men they will never end up with, and they will constantly lament that “the good ones always get away”. Once they turn 30, those complaints turn to “Where have all the good guys gone” — despite the fact that they never really had the “good guys” except for a few hours at a time.
So yeah… there are loads of single women in Copenhagen.
You don’t want them.
They’re awful.
Timely: http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/12/media/univision-fires-rodner-figueroa-michelle-obama/index.html
Free speech and small government will inevitably lead to all sorts of newspeak, not just the leftoid sort. If you want to ban leftist speech
[CH: where did i say i wanted to ban leftoid speech? i just want to mock it without threat of expulsion or, worse, getting shot like ferguson cops by the brainless henchmen of the left.]
entirely you would have to ban free speech and have an authoritarian government to enforce a leftism ban. You really are no better than the leftists who want to ban pro-White and pro-male speech.
YKW
What a lovely bunch.
America and the EU will have to break apart if they are to survive united.
Break apart from each other? Or each will have to break itself apart?
Both, I assume.
The eurozone is in a slow-motion crackup right now, although whether this will sink the entire EU yet is an open question.
The USA is unlikely to break up at all, unless its economy continues to head into the crapper, which would then create the right conditions, as Ukraine has recently shown.
[…] Forked-Tongue Leftoid Poopytalk […]
“The forum takes place just over two weeks after the attacks on Charlie Hebdo and the Hyper Cacher supermarket which left 17 dead and on the same day as the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn came in third place in the Greek general election.”
Nice framing, there. The dead in France have nothing to do with the fact that this group encourages mass immigration into Europe (where Middle Easterners don’t belong) in the first place. It’s because Greeks in Greece are asserting their right not to be swamped by the very same people European YKW campaigned to have stuck in France. All this noise as the YKWs call for unity amongst their own kind. There’s a reason people dislike YKWs.
“For the first time, a high-level and official pan-European forum discussed practical ways to combat the rise of Antisemitism, racism and religious radicalism in Europe.”
Maybe if YKWs actually treated other groups the way they wish for their group to be treated (instead of resorting to the typical double standards), people would not hate them so much. The “hate” doesn’t come from some mystical vacuum.
Women must be protected from their stupid decisions to give naked photos to men whom they should know, because of the hookup/non-marriage culture women created after being “liberated” by feminism, will eventually not be their boyfriend/lover/husband, after she dumps him, potentially breaking his heart. Or it could be some guy she’s known on tinder for 30 minutes, as many of them are doing now.
http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/12/technology/twitter-revenge-porn/index.html
This story only barely mentions the EJC, not even spelling out what it means. This censorhip has been heavily pushed for (“prioritized”) by Moshe Kantor, president of the European Jewish Congress. Because of “the successes of extremist parties in Europe”, i.e. those who want Europeans to remain the majority. The EJC includes many influential members.
Jewish organizations in Europe have always pushed for mass immigration as their number one issue. Then neocons in the U.S. pretend that “rising Muslim anti-Semitism” is a problem – they’re always the victims, right? But as one of the leading profiles said, Arab youth in the second generation are “integrated” (turn to the Black hiphop culture) and are no threat.
Even if they kill a handful of the Tribe, that’s just beneficial. Why? Because it can be used to silence Europeans. The EJC’s push for this censoring law is not only motivated by “extremist parties”, but also by “recent atrocities in Paris, Brussels and Toulouse.”
So they push for Arabs and Africans to enter Europe. A handful of Arabs and Africans attack a handful of Tribe members because of their role in taking the last 22 percent of Palestinian land. This is then exploited to censor Europeans.
The Tribe is in high positions in media everywhere in Europe – Britain, Sweden, Poland, you name it. And they always push for the same thing: expanding the EU to poor countries so they can move to the West, fighting Israel’s critics in the Middle East, and above all, mass immigration of non-Whites.
When the FPÖ joined the government in Austria, Israel immediately pulled out its embassy and worked with EU leftists to isolate Austria, and intimidate corporations into cutting investment there. While the big media, as if on cue, started attacking Austria and supporting the isolation effort. This was a bare-faced attack on a European nation for one single reason, that they wanted to limit immigration somewhat. Never forget either that or the many other examples.
We all know this. How do we get the rest of the mainstream world to understand it?
We all flood the realm of politics would be a suggestion.
But only eloquent well spoken people well versed in the crimson arts.
Meanwhile, of course, Israel has racialist laws. Dirty Christians are forbidden from marrying the Chosen Ones. When Greek Orthodox priests march through Golgotha every year, Jews line up to shout their hatred at the priests and spit at them, taking extra care to spit at the large wooden cross they carry. There is no mass immigration to Israel, which they push for in Western countries – one standard for them, another standard for the rest of us. Now they have even started with DNA tests to see if Jewish immigrants from Russia are true members of the race – if not, they can’t enter.
What would happen if a White nation used DNA tests to ensure only Whites could immigrate from another country, stopping Jewish immigrants with this test? You know what would happen. It would be on the front page of every newspaper. The Lobby in Washington would scream bloody murder, and the paid Washington stooges would attack.
Jewish hardons for open borders is explained fully here. If you can’t read the whole thing, check out page 11 for the main idea. BTW I got my twitter account deleted for posting this document. Be careful who you show it to.
http://www.prometheism.net/library/CultureOfCritique.pdf
That twitter deleted you (while having “#blacklivesmatter”) literally painted on its physical walls in its offices proves what I’ve been saying. Ferguson in December really took any previous cover that had been hanging on over YKW media. lzolzozlozlozlzolzozlzo
Yet still no talk of a real revolution to take back our fourth estate, at least, let alone the government itself.
The neocons are the real concern.
Promotion of tolerance to limit tolerance? Isn’t this like trying to divide by zero?
just MoT speak for surrender documents.
They’re basically saying that they want to outlaw anyone who they themselves don’t tolerate, and promote those they do want to tolerate.
Ergo, whites = No Go non whites = Ok
War is coming.
A bit OT but Madonna has revealed that she has been raped.
Not recently, I assume?
Mind you there are some sick bastards Over Here.
Delayed rape claims are the new “leaked” sex tapes.
Well, it’s nice to see she’s kept a level head on her shoulders and maintained her virtue, through it all.
Duh.
what color was he?
what color was he?
thwack? That you?
The Ministry of Truth heartily endorses this example of enlightened progressiveness.
democracy doesn’t work if one party despises its citizenry…and you have modern travel technology in which, without much effort, you import about 10% of your population in less than a decade.
EU has always been anti-democracy. It’s just sad that the USA got this disease too. And as someone noted, the 3rd world invasion followed blue state pathways since their welfare laws were super lenient.
Indeed, the American Founding Fathers were all firmly against democracy.
Democracy is a hypocrisy.
Leftoids keep telling us how great imported turd world junk DNA and multicult are. At the same time they talk about tolerance. But tolearance is the ability to accept, experience, or survive something harmful or unpleasant. If those things are so great, why is tolerance needed? Banging a 10 has no need for tolerance, it’s a great joy. Getting violated from behind by a huge inmate, now that calls for tons of tolerance.
To a leftoid, tolerance is a virtue best found in others.
This biggest misconception of free speech is that it you can say anything you want with no accountability or responsible. The low IQ abuse that misconception and the high IQ take advantage of it. Freedom of speech protects you from the government not your neighbor. Calling someone a racial epithet might get you fired from your job but the government cannot prosecute or convict you in anyway.That’s why I don’t understand why people who say things online or in public then become shocked when people don’t like what they say or they get fired, or banished from a group. I don’t mind a racist person because they are honest and comfortable with who they are and are not influenced by others on their racial views be it good or bad, but a stupid cowardly person who apologizes profusely and insincerely and blames everyone but himself is no less cowardly than the spineless cowards you speak of.
How refreshing would it have been if one of the SAE frat guys said “You know what you got me I am racist” instead of “I am sorry, I didn’t mean it, I was drinking” Parent’s say “We never taught our son to do that” I believe whites can regain patriarchy and social dominance if they develop some moxy and not cower to those who wish to undermine and chastise them. It seems as if whites gave up the fight and are ok with SWPL, money, and the illusion of dominance. I don’t blame them though, life is too short worry about things you can’t control or have power over? Why lose your job and social standing over a word? It is not worth it in today’s society. Is it honorable? maybe. Is it impractical? Absolutely
I think the white conscience has developed to the point that genocide, war, slavery, etc is morally abhorrent but 200 years ago, it was their said birth right. Reason can no longer be used to justify anything that remotely harms people. The shaming and guilt tripping about race just makes whites resentful, angry, but also excessively altruistic and deferring.
You can’t expel someone from a public university for saying something that you don’t like. It was a public university and is thus a constitutional free speech issue. What the president did was extremely stupid. And if the expelled decide to litigate, it will cost the university tons (and rightfully so) and likely the president his job (good riddance).
I agree with you, if in fact there rights were violated. I don’t think SAE practices discriminatory recruiting then again I don’t know what is said behind closed doors, so I can’t say it is a racist frat or if the frat is tolerant or sympathetic to racism, before being exposed of course. It is almost common sense though, a white fraternity will do or say things non whites will not agree with and that is OK, it is just unwise to do that around people who are not part of the frat knowing the ways of current society. One thing is the “hostile educational environment” could be used because of the black populace and it being hostile since a racial slur was used in a racist context with anti black sentiment. If it were an all white college this would not happen because there would be no one there to create a hostile environment for. This gives ammo to those who do not support integration, diversity or the civil rights act and an example of why the races should be separated, that is a bit extreme since the chance of that happening is almost nil but Affirmative action is a conversation that could be had. Who they are letting into colleges based on things other than merit and that is with any race. No racial bias just fair competition,
Public University.
I’m sure the founding fathers would love that.
This sounds dangerously like lib-speak. Especially the first 5 sentences of your 1st paragraph.
And it’s worse given the Left’s propaganda that the worst thing any human could be is a racist, -which you seemed to have absorbed whole-hog.
It’s not a big hop from there to make it illegal to disagree with or criticise any newly-protected class of the PC fascists.
And from there, off to the new leftist concentration-camps reserved for dissidents, just like Papa Stalin & Uncle Vlad teaching.
The idea you think it’s okay for someone to lose their job over speaking their mind (after the liberal ykw media has socially-pressured the whole group into their agenda) makes you not much better than the garden-variety shrieking Janeane-Garofalo-grade SJW.
The sad part is lefties, and ykws are perfectly-fine with [their own brand of ] racism & prejudice. -One guess who it’s now hypocritically-Ok to discriminate against…
I hope by Lib you mean Libertarian 😉
Personally i don’t care about racism or who is racist as long as it is not directed at me in a disrespectful or hurtful way. I have accepted that people can be racist, even from my own race, just as whites have accepted people can be racist to them.
I was a bit superficial though so let me explain. I do not agree with people losing their job for expressing their mind but if the company/organization has a no racism policy and your views are deemed racist you can be fired. In my opinion that doesn’t mean they should or deserve to be but management has to support the company because if not what good is management? That’s just irresponsible. When you take a job you sign a contract agreeing you accept the company’s rules and policy, if you break them, you can be fired. Not to pontificate but people have to grow up and take personal responsibility and be cognizant of what they are saying when they represent things other than themselves. If a guy is dumb enough to violate company policy than he deserves to be fired, if he is smart and avoids suspicion he deserves the job. You can either start your own business or work for someone who tolerates your views. If the CEO or company owner, says no racism, sexual harassment, etc than just don’t do it. His company his rules.
I don’t think SAE practices discriminatory recruiting then again I don’t know what is said behind closed doors, so I can’t say it is a racist frat or if the frat is tolerant or sympathetic to racism, before being exposed of course. It is almost common sense though, a white fraternity will do or say things non whites will not agree with and that is OK, it is just unwise to do that around people who are not part of the frat knowing the ways of current society.
You have to admit that the kids were pretty stupid to do that outside of the frat house and around outsiders. The guy who filmed the video is not a frat brother no doubt about it. I just think that if they are in fact racist, like they are psychologically aware of and accept of their views that they should admit that and be who they are. The video is out, it’s done. But if they were just having fun and really have no ill will or sentiment to any race or persons of any race then they must be truly sorry and just made a terrible mistake, a gross error in judgement. One must accept the consequences, no matter how unjust or unfair. At the end of the day everyone has to make their own bed.
I concur with Ronin’s message.
“minority groups who risk the security of other minorities”
Translation: anybody who threatens Jews.
I will admit, Jews cause problems for ALL races and ethnicities. Jews are all about control at any cost and they don’t listen to anyone.
They’ll listen to Hitler!
Hence the term “stiff-necked”.
On a note of irony:
… and the limitation of tolerance towards
minority groups who risk the security of other minorities and of their host countries.
I find this deliciously ironic… in short, be tolerant, except towards those MINORITY groups who risk the security of OTHER minorities and of their host country.
If I were a YKW, I’d be careful swinging that two-edged sword. lzlzozlzozlzozlzozlzozlozlozol
Also BBC Chiefs canning Clarkson from his job on TopGear as part of a liberal fascist witch-hunt using his recent tiff as a proxy.
BBC chief Danny COHEN, to be specific.
Nah Clarkson’s got a whiff of carrion off the Beeb’s rotting corpse, and this is just a continuation of the prog’s noble tradition of self-promotion by brouhaha. I bet the (eminently punchable) producer-wallah will jump ship with him to Murdoch’s deathstar, or whoever’s the highest bidder.
Beeb is doomed. Now demanding that all the world should be taxed regardless of whether they even look/listen to their totalitarian cathedral shite or not.
Some kind of broadband/computer tax, rolled up in council charges like the garbage hauling or schools, but going exclusively to their private concern, cutting out any competitors. Yes, they are quite mental. So?
Seriously, it’s worse than Crapita demanding money with menaces on the Beeb’s behalf, monthly, for a TV “Licence” (I have never owned a TV, stopped even watching some time after the Moon landings lol).
Nobody with half an ounce of sense is going to pay. Poll Tax MK II. Watch this space, we do a good riot.
“Never before, has Europe’s intellectual elite joined with the continent’s senior political leadership and top-legal experts within the same conference to genuinely address the very real threats faced by al Europe’s citizens.
Now we must transfer these important words into real action.” Kantor said
——————————————————————————————————
“Continent senior political leadership” just wonder who that might be?
But the real point is this:
“Now we must transfer these important words into real action.” Kantor said”
What this Orwellian language means is the attack on blogs and web sites like this one and ultimately the censorship.
Anybody who for a moment believes that “Continent senior political leadership”
will allow their 60 years long work of suppressing the descent and thought policing crumble into pieces is highly delusional.
What is really laughable here is the language, but even that is not entirely knew
As St-Just,a famous Jacobin once said
“Pas de liberté pour les ennemis de la liberté !”
History of all leftard movements is nothing else but an attempt to imprison,
imprison free thought, imprison free enterprise and finally imprison freedom itself
all of these under the disguise of big meaningless words
That is why the attempt to censor and suppress is called
“a framework for promotion of tolerance ”
One of Europe problem amongst many is the lack of lamp posts on its streets, so let us develop “a framework for promotion of building lamp posts,one for each member of Continent senior political leadership “
Just another Cohencidence
The jewish takeover of France is impressive.
They are everywhere, everyone can see it, though it is forbidden by law to say so.
The awaiting moderation takeover of this forum is likewise ironclad.
lol
Heh here in the UK they even have their own police force: http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2015/01/11/24936FBE00000578-0-image-a-58_1420939394735.jpg
It’s normally illegal to impersonate a police officer / vehicle, but they’re Jewish, so it’s ok apparently. (Even has a fucking light bar on the top to look similar to a police car)
Preposterous, equally repugnant as muslims declaring sharia zones.
Europe needs a purge so badly.
These same vermin exist in Brooklyn NY. Hasid Cops. Repugnant cancer.
Leftoids always say that anti-male sexism and anti-white racism don’t exist because white males are in charge.
To that I say: does this mean that anti-Semitism doesn’t exist?
To learn who control a society you only need to ask who you are not allowed to criticize.
Naggers don’t control society.
[…] Source: Heartiste […]
CNN news this evening was speculating that Putin was gravely ill. Turns out he was in Switzerland to witness the birth of his child out of a pussy he busted that is half his age.
Alpha.
Hate speech is speech jews hate.
Anti-Semitism is a disease. You catch it from Jews.
Welcome to the Department of Redundancy Department.
Nincompoops.
What is the best way to temper a women’s hypergamy in a LTR/marriage?
Sex or by not giving a shit? I think it is by having an attitude of not giving a shit. That is what has worked for me at least.
[CH: sex AND not giving a shit. play that hamster like a fiddle.]
Another thing you could do is select ruthlessly for a woman who doesn’t want as much alpha as other women do. Most women prefer alpha men. That being said, each individual woman prefers it to a different degree. It is possible to find one of those rare straight women who really does prefer beta men, or one who doesn’t have a preference. Even if you can’t find such a woman, it might be more feasible to find a woman who only has a slight preference for alphaness. That way you don’t have to keep putting up an act for the rest of your life.
If you are one of the top 15% most alpha men, your life is already set.
SC, how can the top 15% be set if they have to be “putting up an act for the rest of their life” for a high maintenance women?
Don’t women who like beta’s have a low desire for sex?
@Putin, what I meant to say is that about 15% of (White American) men are naturally alpha so they don’t have to put up an act. The other 85% of White American men can either put up an act, or ruthlessly select for a woman who prefers betas, has no preference, or has only a slight preference for alphas.
“15% of (White American) men are naturally alpha so they don’t have to put up an act.”
Got it. Would agree.
“[CH: sex AND not giving a shit. play that hamster like a fiddle.]”
THIS. Your woman needs orgasms. Either she can get them from her husband, or she’ll end up getting them from the likes of YaReally. Rub that clit [gently, not too rough] while you’re fucking her, and make her cum and cum and cum. Then ignore her for the rest of the day when you aren’t fucking her.
“Your woman needs orgasms.”
I owned a lot of women back when I was single without giving them the big O or even getting to third.
But for the sake of argument are orgasms from a magic wand just as good or do they have to be manual?
Putin, the magic wand (vibrator, I assume) question … it varies. I have seen all kinds of variation when it comes to women and orgasms.
A general observation on this subject: it seems that women who have orgasm easily are usually those who love sex. Those who treat sex as something that can be nice but that they can do without have a harder time getting orgasms – one girl I met had never had one.
Does the easy orgasm come from a love of sex, or does the love of sex come from an easy orgasm? I don’t know. How much of it is physical and how much is psychological? You could ask the same about men with erection problems. Probably both are factors, it varies from person to person.
I have also met girls who really loved sex but who still had difficulty having an orgasm when having sex. (They could get an orgasm when using their hands or a vibrator though. Because they knew exactly how and when to apply pressure. Much like it is easier for a man to come through masturbation than for a woman to make him come with her hand.) So again, it varies.
I have met a few girls who could come through regular intercourse without stimulation of the clitoris. That’s the best kind. Like one girl said, she is aware of how lucky she is.
I have even met two girls who could come VERY easily from sex, after just a few minutes, and after they had come they didn’t want any more sex because they were so sensitive. That was not fun. That’s when you need handcuffs.
“I have also met girls who really loved sex but who still had difficulty having an orgasm when having sex.” Yes, one of my thoughts. Thanks for the info Arb.
Derb writes in the twitted Taki article: “It seems to me the pace of hysteria has been picking up since the start of this decade.”
I noticed that too. The first time I saw such a leftoid Kulturkampf blitz was in the early 90s. That all calmed down, but their legal and victories were not rolled back. The last American decade, the 80s and the sense that the country and future care ours, was dead.
This could be another such ratchet moment, where things calm down again except that you’ll regularly now see trannies thrust into public space.
Or this could be a runaway diesel engine that doesn’t stop and the RPMs rise until the whole thing explodes. I’m wondering if LBF is right, and war in some form is imminent. Those of us who lived under 70s eastern European communism recall that time in some ways as halcyon days of human dignity and freedom of thought, in comparison to today’s West. I do, for one. See Srdja Trifkovic on YouTube, he does too.
There is an edge to recent writings of CH and Sailer that wasnt there earlier. I bring them up because both have had renown for their particular lightness when writing about heavier matters. Both now show flashes of anger. It’s like we sense that the enemy elite is starting to no longer trying hard to keep its smiley mask on.
> “This could be another such ratchet moment”
The weird thing right now is Obama & Valerie Jarrett going scorched earth on Hillary. Not sure how that’s gonna play out. It looked like they wanted Fauxahontas for a while, but now this ex-Governor of Maryland is getting a lot of play.
Those of us who lived under 70s eastern European communism recall that time in some ways as halcyon days of human dignity and freedom of thought, in comparison to today’s West.
That is a very sobering thought.
As a wise man wrote way back in the 1990s, no king of old had as much power over the average man’s life as the democratic governments of today. A farmer in the Middle Ages could go his entire life without seeing a government agent.
As mass immigration increases, always going in only one direction, so too will suppression of dissent increase. It has to, especially when people have access to the internet and can see the statistics, read about the crimes and the costs and what the future will be like. The internet is a problem and so suppression of opinion must increase, and to support suppression there must be hysteria.
I always thought that Orwell’s 1984 exaggerated. It had people believing “Oceania was at war with Eurasia. Oceania had always been at war with Eurasia.” And then switch from that to “always at was with Eastasia”, and back, and people would believe any version. I thought, surely people will not believe something so blatantly untrue. But today we have people saying “there are no races”, even though if you deny brain differences anyone can see that there are physical differences, the bones and muscles and so on, and all physicians know there are differences in the reaction to medicines, susceptibility to diseases and ailments, etc.
So even if you don’t believe in the mental, the physical is far more than enough to be called “different races”. If there were no races it would be random whether a child was born White, Asian, Black etc, no matter if the parents were Whites, Asians, Blacks, right? So there are races.
But no. There are people who truly believe that “there are no races”. Despite what their eyes are telling them. It’s like believing it’s snowing when it’s summer, or that sea and land are the same, or that two plus two is five if the government says so.
I have actually met leftists who say that two plus two is five if the government says so, because the government is democratically elected, so everything it decides is the will of the people. They even said, when I asked them, that there is no objective, physical reality aside from what people think. What this comes from I suppose is, first, the cynical leftist talk about “there is no truth, only people’s opinions”, and second, the belief that whatever the government says words mean, they should mean – then their dim minds take that to mean that all of reality is what the government says. Because they WANT to believe that. Because their side is in control. To say that it is limited in any way would be disloyal.
In other words – the current hysteria can go on without any limit. Like Mao’s Cultural Revolution. Yes, people were poorer and less literate then. But people are more in contact with the media on a daily basis now.
Brilliant comparison with the “there are no races” canard (while believeing it is possibly to discriminate on the basis of race – something that doesn’t exist!)
The only point they have is that it is sometimes hard to determine who is or isn’t white. Have you seen Assad’s wife? What race do Berbers belong to? They sure as hell aren’t darkies.
“A farmer in the Middle Ages could go his entire life without seeing a government agent.”
but heaven help him if he didn’t rendez-vous to the Landlord’s factor or agent every Quarter-Day with the rent. In the ditch with all his family, if he was lucky (torture, the guarantor of rents :¬) ).
And the Landlord would then interface with the Monarch re taxes.
So much more convenient and hygienic. A posh chap on a horse with a sackful of silver, instead of an endless train of stinky mumbling fuckwits handing over chickens and cheeses of doubtful integrity (and having a fortnight off productive work, just to trek to the Boss’s Castle). They didn’t have freezers back then.
“Have you seen Assad’s wife?”
Assad’s wife is British. There was a big puff piece on her in Vanity Fair just before Syria exploded.
“In other words – the current hysteria can go on without any limit.”
Well,
“If those days had not been cut short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the elect those days will be shortened.”
But you don’t put much faith in them Christ following fools and their blabber.
oink
The people who truly follow Christ – and take the time to understand the Bible – really DO know what’s going on. They have the full view, the whole picture.
OT – Beta of the year.
http://www.visiontimes.com/2015/03/13/omg-what-this-student-did-after-being-rejected-by-a-girl-is-crazy.html
The irony here is that literally a billion other Chinese girls look just like “the one” this dude couldn’t live without.
Why jump from a building at school, at daytime? If he really wanted to commit suicide he would do it in private. Now they rushed him to the hospital.
That’s not beta, that’s some omega-level shit right there.
Re: America breaking up: We were never one nation to begin with except in a technical sense, if you believe Colin Woodard’s thesis in “American Nations.” What you have, or had, were multiple regions who had very different histories and ways of getting on in the world. Yankees of the Northeast set about working tirelessly, often brutally to crush all the other regions and impose upon them their hegemony and their values (Universalism, Equality, Democracy, Industrial Capitalism, etc.) These very Jewy Puritans passed the torch naturally to their great heroes, the Jews.
Take a look at this map of “SuperZips” where richest and most “educated,” i.e. most brainwashed and on board with the agenda, people live: http://www.businessinsider.com/map-americas-super-elite-live-in-these-zip-codes-2013-12
Those clumps in the Northeast and West Coast run America and everyone else is just along for the ride.
[…] The consequences of relativism. Related: An EU framework for the promotion of tolerance which defines the limits of tolerance. […]
I consider myself a liberal, although I lean right on some key issues. Despite my liberal tendencies, I almost always agree with the brilliant thoughts found on conservative blogs like and free northerner. Always a pleasure to absorb such a vastly different perspective than the mainstream.